OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Law and Legislation Committee Meeting Summary - August 17, 2021

Law and Legislation CommitteeTuesday, August 17, 2021
BodySacramento, California
SessionLaw and Legislation Committee
DateTuesday, August 17, 2021
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:25

Okay, let's go ahead and call the meeting.

0:27

This meeting of the law and legislation committee to order.

0:30

Madam Clerk, please call the role to establish the quorum.

0:34

Councilmember Gatta.

0:36

Here.

0:37

Council Member Valenzuela.

0:40

Here, Vice Mayor Harris or Vice Chair Harris.

0:43

Here?

0:44

And Chair Shaneer.

0:46

Here.

0:48

Thank you, Madam Clerk.

0:49

Appreciate that.

0:51

All right, let's go ahead and get started.

0:54

We have a consent calendar with the log and correspondence.

1:00

Any questions, comments on either of those two?

1:03

Move consent.

1:04

Sure.

1:05

Okay.

1:05

A motion.

1:07

I'll second that.

1:08

And a second.

1:10

Go ahead, please call the roll.

1:12

It appears that we don't have anyone with their hands raised to make public comments on the consent calendar.

1:17

So council member Geta.

1:19

All right.

1:20

Councilmember Valenzuela.

1:22

Yes.

1:22

Vice Chair Harris.

1:24

I.

1:25

And Chair Shaneer.

1:26

And I.

1:27

Great.

1:28

Okay, let's go ahead to item three.

1:33

This is an ordinance around drive-through restaurants.

1:36

Mr.

1:36

Norman, you'll be presenting as him.

1:39

Yes, thank you.

1:40

And good afternoon, Chair and Council members.

1:41

My name is Garrett Norman, associate planner.

1:44

The item before you is an ordinance that would allow for a city council call-up provision for drive-through restaurant conditional use permits.

1:51

The proposed amendment would allow the council member for which district the project is located in, and the mayor the ability to call up any drive-through conditional use permit application.

2:02

When staff presented this ordinance to the Planning Design Commission on June 24th, the ordinance was drafted to follow the same call-up procedures as cannabis CEPs.

2:11

Since that hearing, staff has modified the ordinance to eliminate the ability for any other council member to call up the project if the original requester withdraws their request.

2:23

Staff believes drive-throughs are district-specific issues, and this change will provide more certainty in the development review process for applicants.

2:30

All other components of the call-up provision will remain the same, which includes a notification to the mayor and council member after the decision is made, which then starts a 15-day period for the project to be called up for council.

2:44

This ordinance has been drafted at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Ashby and is tentatively scheduled for hearing before the city council in September.

2:52

Staff is recommending the commission or the committee pass a motion to forward a recommendation of approval to the city council.

2:59

Thank you.

3:01

Great.

3:12

But particularly for Councilmember Valenzuela, I think a little bit of context on the call-up going back beyond before cannabis did that.

3:28

Thank you, uh, Chair Shaneira Tom Pace, Director of Community Development.

3:33

A number of years ago, the city uh and I don't remember exactly when it was, but the city created a council call-up process.

3:42

Um that uh was basically another option beyond uh community member filing an appeal to take a decision that would otherwise stop at the planning and design commission or at the zoning administrator level to the city council for a council review.

4:04

After that was in place for many years, um, it was abolished as part of the development process uh streamlining effort that was undertaken oh about seven, eight years ago.

4:18

And we heard from developers in uh in the community who had expressed concerns about the call-up process, adding additional uncertainty to the development review process and also concerned that it was sometimes uh perhaps being abused by the council members who would uh threaten to call up an item even before a decision had been made on the item if uh the developer didn't agree to modify a project in a way that was satisfactory to that particular council member.

4:51

So at the time that uh the development process improvements were going through, the city council agreed to remove the call-up uh provisions, and the city ceased to have a call-up process.

5:03

And then uh a few years later, as the cannabis ordinances were being updated to reflect uh changes in state legislation around uh the legalized cannabis industry, um, the council determined to add call-up provision just specifically for uh cannabis conditional use permits.

5:25

And uh, and so until today, uh that's the only type of activity I should say uh until a few weeks ago.

5:32

That was the only type of activity that could be uh called up.

5:36

And then uh a few weeks ago we had an item on um drive-thru restaurants.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Cannabis Regulation█████████████████████████████████████████████59%
Land Use Planning████████████████████26%
Public Comments██████8%
Procedural█████7%
Summary of Proceedings

Law and Legislation Committee Meeting Summary - August 17, 2021

The Law and Legislation Committee met on Tuesday, August 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. via teleconference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The meeting was called to order with members present, and the committee considered two consent items and two discussion items. The meeting adjourned after committee comments and public comment.

Consent Calendar

  • Item 1: Law and Legislation Log (File ID: 2021-00198) – Approved by a single motion.
  • Item 2: Legislative Advocacy Correspondence (File ID: 2021-00263) – Received and filed as part of the consent calendar.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • A public comment on Item 03 was received from a caller named John. The transcript does not capture the content of his comment.
  • No public comments on matters not on the agenda were received.

Discussion Items

  • Item 3: Ordinance Amending Section 17.228 of the Sacramento City Code Related to Drive-Through Restaurants (M21-003) – The committee reviewed a resolution determining the ordinance is exempt from CEQA and the proposed ordinance adding a City Council call-up provision for drive-through restaurants. The committee discussed the item and passed a motion forwarding the resolution and ordinance to the City Council for consideration.
  • Item 4: Land Use Cannabis Study for District 2 and Ordinance Amending Sections 17.228.900 and 17.228.920 Relating to Conditional Use Permits for Cannabis Production and Cannabis Dispensaries (M21-005) – The committee reviewed a resolution finding the ordinance exempt from CEQA and an ordinance amending cannabis regulations in District 2 (area bounded by Highway 160, Arden Way, Natomas East Main Drainage Canal, and the city limits). The committee discussed the item and passed a motion forwarding the resolution and ordinance to the City Council for consideration.

Key Outcomes

  • The consent calendar (Items 1 and 2) was approved unanimously.
  • The committee voted to forward both Item 3 (drive-through restaurant ordinance) and Item 4 (cannabis regulations in District 2) to the full City Council with recommendations for approval.
  • The next meeting was scheduled to start at 2:10 p.m. (as stated by the chair during adjournment).

Note: The available transcript is incomplete and does not include detailed discussion or vote tallies; outcomes are inferred from the agenda recommendations and the committee's actions as recorded in the meeting segments.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, let's go ahead and call the meeting. This meeting of the law and legislation committee to order. Madam Clerk, please call the role to establish the quorum. Councilmember Gatta. Here. Council Member Valenzuela. Here, Vice Mayor Harris or Vice Chair Harris. Here? And Chair Shaneer. Here. Thank you, Madam Clerk. Appreciate that. All right, let's go ahead and get started. We have a consent calendar with the log and correspondence. Any questions, comments on either of those two? Move consent. Sure. Okay. A motion. I'll second that. And a second. Go ahead, please call the roll. It appears that we don't have anyone with their hands raised to make public comments on the consent calendar. So council member Geta. All right. Councilmember Valenzuela. Yes. Vice Chair Harris. I. And Chair Shaneer. And I. Great. Okay, let's go ahead to item three. This is an ordinance around drive-through restaurants. Mr. Norman, you'll be presenting as him. Yes, thank you. And good afternoon, Chair and Council members. My name is Garrett Norman, associate planner. The item before you is an ordinance that would allow for a city council call-up provision for drive-through restaurant conditional use permits. The proposed amendment would allow the council member for which district the project is located in, and the mayor the ability to call up any drive-through conditional use permit application. When staff presented this ordinance to the Planning Design Commission on June 24th, the ordinance was drafted to follow the same call-up procedures as cannabis CEPs. Since that hearing, staff has modified the ordinance to eliminate the ability for any other council member to call up the project if the original requester withdraws their request. Staff believes drive-throughs are district-specific issues, and this change will provide more certainty in the development review process for applicants. All other components of the call-up provision will remain the same, which includes a notification to the mayor and council member after the decision is made, which then starts a 15-day period for the project to be called up for council. This ordinance has been drafted at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Ashby and is tentatively scheduled for hearing before the city council in September. Staff is recommending the commission or the committee pass a motion to forward a recommendation of approval to the city council. Thank you. Great. But particularly for Councilmember Valenzuela, I think a little bit of context on the call-up going back beyond before cannabis did that.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com