OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Sacramento, California/Other
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Sacramento Law and Legislation Committee Meeting: October 20, 2026

Other — Tuesday, October 20, 2026
BodySacramento, California
SessionOther
DateTuesday, October 20, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 44:07

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:20

Please call the roll.

0:27

Welcome to the October 20th Lawn Legislation Committee.

0:30

If you would please call the role established corn.

Speaker 2

0:32

Thank you, Councilmember Dickinson.

0:34

Councilmember Jennings

Speaker 1

0:36

and

Speaker 2

0:36

Chair Pleckibon.

Speaker 1

0:37

If you're able, please rise and join me in the land acknowledgement and pledge of allegiance.

Unassigned speaker

0:43

To

Speaker 1

0:43

the original people of this land, the Nissanon people, Southern Maidu, Valley and Plains, Miwok, Patwinwintu peoples, and the people of the Walton Rancheria, Sacramento's only federally recognized tribe.

0:53

May we acknowledge and honor the Native people who came before us and still walk beside us today on these ancestral lands by choosing to gather together today in the active practice of acknowledgment and appreciation for Sacramento's indigenous peoples' history, contribution, and lives.

Unassigned speaker

1:08

Thank

Speaker 1

1:08

you.

1:08

And now pledge.

1:10

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands.

1:16

One nation under God, indivisible of liberty and justice for all.

1:22

Thank you.

1:25

Next we have the consent.

1:30

Any public comment?

Speaker 2

1:32

Do you have one speaker on the consent calendar, Rob Youngren?

Unassigned speaker

1:46

Good morning, Council members and committee members.

Robbie Epgren · Speaker 3Inferred

1:48

My name is Robbie Epgren.

1:50

I am a uh e-bike program manager for Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates.

1:54

I sit on the county's bicycle advisory committee.

1:57

I'm a uh league certified instructor through the League of American Cyclists, and I have worked uh for the last three years on e-bikes, helping people who haven't ridden in 10, 20, 30 years get on a bike for the first time.

2:10

Uh e-bikes have made getting around by active transportation a possibility uh that they didn't think was available to

Unassigned speaker

2:20

them.

Unassigned speaker

2:23

Uh

Robbie Epgren · Speaker 3Inferred

2:23

clean, reliable, cost-effective transportation is what we need more of in the city of Sacramento.

2:28

Uh the county coroner is still tracking uh deaths by car as a public health crisis.

2:35

We need more safe uh more safety on our roads and less restriction of legal e-bike use.

2:43

I have full agreement that emoto's are a problem.

2:46

We have creative uh policy recommendations to make

Unassigned speaker

2:49

to

Robbie Epgren · Speaker 3Inferred

2:49

help get emotos off the street.

2:52

But uh this last year we've shot down about 10 bills at the California state legislature, uh, all looking to make radical changes to the three-class system, uh, like we saw in New Jersey, ended up uh with you know no e-bikes being able to be sold in New Jersey.

3:08

Uh but we did get 1167 through uh bleaks here, which is the only bill that sought to uh change how we dealt with emoto's uh that goes into effect in January.

3:20

So uh AB11 or 2346 from Wilson had a lot of age restrictions that we've uh led to uh protectural policing issues.

3:30

Uh we got those provisions removed from it, and there's a long list of bills that never made it to the floor.

3:35

So we encourage you to reach out to your local subject matter experts and uh wish you luck and crafting uh sensible policy.

3:43

Thank you.

Speaker 1

3:44

We have two more items before we get to e-bikes.

3:45

I just didn't want to break your flow.

3:47

Um, we'll hold those comments for the the next item.

Unassigned speaker

3:49

I

Speaker 1

3:49

have a motion to have a second for consent.

3:52

Motion and second, all in favor, please say aye.

3:54

Aye.

3:54

Any opposed or abstain?

3:55

Thank goodness, otherwise it wouldn't pass.

3:57

Uh next item is the ordinance amending various provisions of the title 17

Unassigned speaker

4:01

with a

Speaker 1

4:02

second of city code relating to registered housing plans.

Unassigned speaker

4:04

And

Speaker 1

4:04

there's a record number.

4:05

Bruce, take it away.

Speaker 4

4:10

Thank you.

4:11

Bruce Monica and Urban Design Manager.

4:14

Um the interest of a more predictable design review planning is proposing to add to streamline Sacramento a process where the owner of a building design, the copyright owner, could ask for that design to be registered with the city of Sacramento.

4:32

Um, the idea that this would could either be used for new design or existing designs.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Bicycle Safety████████████████████████████████████36%
Urban Design████████████████████████████28%
Public Safety███████████████15%
Public Comments██████████10%
Planning and Zoning███████7%
Procedural████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Sacramento Law and Legislation Committee Meeting: October 20, 2026

The Law and Legislation Committee of the Sacramento City Council met on Tuesday, October 20, 2026, at 11:00 AM. The committee, chaired by Councilmember Caity Maple (District 5) and including Vice Chair Phil Pluckebaum (District 4), Roger Dickinson (District 2), and Rick Jennings (District 7), considered consent items, an ordinance on registered house plans, and a councilmember proposal on regulating e-bikes and similar devices.

Consent Calendar

  • The committee unanimously approved the September 22, 2026 meeting minutes, the Law and Legislation Log, and the Legislative Advocacy Correspondence. A single speaker, Rob Youngren (Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates), provided public comment on the consent calendar relating to e-bikes, but the committee deferred his specific comments to the relevant discussion item later in the meeting.

Discussion Items

Ordinance Amending Title 17: Registered House Plans (File ID 2026-01826)

  • Proposal: Planning staff presented an ordinance to allow copyright owners of building designs to register their plans with the Planning Director, bypassing a public hearing before the Planning and Design Commission for the architectural design review. The design would still be subject to site-specific reviews, building codes, and all applicable entitlements under existing code. The goal is to speed up approvals for reused designs, including manufactured homes and tiny homes.
  • Deliberation: Vice Chair Pluckebaum and Councilmember Jennings questioned the scope of allowable design modifications, the role of public notice at the site level, and how site-specific decisions would trigger higher levels of review. Staff clarified that the plan registration is purely for the architectural design, and site-level entitlements will follow standard code procedures, potentially requiring commission or council review.
  • Outcome: The committee voted unanimously to forward the ordinance to the City Council for consideration.

Councilmember Proposal: Regulation of E-Bikes, E-Scooters, E-motos, and Plug-in Electric Two-wheelers (File ID 2026-01811)

  • Proposal: The committee was asked to direct staff to begin work on a proposal to regulate and enforce rules for electric bicycles, scooters, mopeds (e-motos), and similar two-wheeled devices. Chair Maple expanded the scope to include electric one-wheel vehicles.
  • Public Testimony: Nine members of the public provided comments.
    • Annette Emery (age 75, e-bike rider) expressed strong support for regulation, suggesting age limits (no children under 16), school-based safety courses, and a ban on e-motos on parkways.
    • Melody Struckman expressed opposition to using staff time on this, arguing that car drivers pose a greater threat than e-bike riders.
    • Martina Thomas (UC Davis Health, avid cyclist who was recently hit by a car) expressed support for stronger enforcement of illegal devices but stressed the need for infrastructure improvements (protected bike lanes), helmet programs, and safety education.
    • Joshua Hutchinson (District 5, daily cyclist) urged the committee to focus on illegal e-motos rather than placing restrictions on legal e-bike use.
    • Donald Gibson (Active Transportation Commission Vice Chair, District 3) expressed support for using staff time but urged a narrow focus on the worst behaviors (illegal e-motos).
    • Sherry Martinez (District 2) expressed opposition, calling the proposal unnecessary and arguing it targets vulnerable groups without addressing enforcement of existing laws.
    • Tim Sullivan was listed as a speaker, but his specific comments were not included in the provided transcript.
    • Nicholas Clark (pedestrian, driver, regular cyclist) expressed support for regulation, highlighting dangerous e-bike speeds on sidewalks.
  • Committee Deliberation: Councilmember Dickinson was open to forwarding the item to Council but stressed the need to understand state preemption and to take a multidisciplinary approach. He moved to direct staff to commence work and forward the item to the full City Council (Option 2). Councilmember Jennings seconded, stressing the importance of education over penalties. Chair Maple supported the motion, framing the discussion around the "three E's": Education, Engineering, and Enforcement.
  • Outcome: The motion passed unanimously.

Public Comments - Matters Not on the Agenda

  • Justin McClanahan (District 5, Peace and Freedom Party, National Lawyers Guild) spoke about alleged city malfeasance regarding sanctuary city policies and cooperation with ICE.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Calendar: Approved unanimously.
  • Ordinance on Registered House Plans: Forwarded to City Council for consideration.
  • Regulation of E-Bikes & E-motos: Staff directed to commence work on the proposal and forward it to the full City Council for consideration without further committee review.

Meeting Transcript

Please call the roll. Welcome to the October 20th Lawn Legislation Committee. If you would please call the role established corn. Thank you, Councilmember Dickinson. Councilmember Jennings and Chair Pleckibon. If you're able, please rise and join me in the land acknowledgement and pledge of allegiance. To the original people of this land, the Nissanon people, Southern Maidu, Valley and Plains, Miwok, Patwinwintu peoples, and the people of the Walton Rancheria, Sacramento's only federally recognized tribe. May we acknowledge and honor the Native people who came before us and still walk beside us today on these ancestral lands by choosing to gather together today in the active practice of acknowledgment and appreciation for Sacramento's indigenous peoples' history, contribution, and lives. Thank you. And now pledge. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible of liberty and justice for all. Thank you. Next we have the consent. Any public comment? Do you have one speaker on the consent calendar, Rob Youngren? Good morning, Council members and committee members. My name is Robbie Epgren. I am a uh e-bike program manager for Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates. I sit on the county's bicycle advisory committee. I'm a uh league certified instructor through the League of American Cyclists, and I have worked uh for the last three years on e-bikes, helping people who haven't ridden in 10, 20, 30 years get on a bike for the first time. Uh e-bikes have made getting around by active transportation a possibility uh that they didn't think was available to them. Uh clean, reliable, cost-effective transportation is what we need more of in the city of Sacramento. Uh the county coroner is still tracking uh deaths by car as a public health crisis. We need more safe uh more safety on our roads and less restriction of legal e-bike use. I have full agreement that emoto's are a problem. We have creative uh policy recommendations to make to help get emotos off the street. But uh this last year we've shot down about 10 bills at the California state legislature, uh, all looking to make radical changes to the three-class system, uh, like we saw in New Jersey, ended up uh with you know no e-bikes being able to be sold in New Jersey. Uh but we did get 1167 through uh bleaks here, which is the only bill that sought to uh change how we dealt with emoto's uh that goes into effect in January. So uh AB11 or 2346 from Wilson had a lot of age restrictions that we've uh led to uh protectural policing issues. Uh we got those provisions removed from it, and there's a long list of bills that never made it to the floor. So we encourage you to reach out to your local subject matter experts and uh wish you luck and crafting uh sensible policy. Thank you. We have two more items before we get to e-bikes. I just didn't want to break your flow. Um, we'll hold those comments for the the next item. I have a motion to have a second for consent. Motion and second, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed or abstain? Thank goodness, otherwise it wouldn't pass.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com