OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Planning & Design Commission Meeting – May 26, 2022: Cannabis Dispensary Approval and COVID-19 Teleconferencing Extension

Planning & Design CommissionThursday, May 26, 2022
BodySacramento, California
SessionPlanning & Design Commission
DateThursday, May 26, 2022
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:22

All right, good evening, everyone.

0:24

Welcome to the City of Sacramento's Planning and Design Commission hearing.

0:28

The date is Thursday, May 26, 2022.

0:32

For staff, commissioners, and applicants logged into the meeting, please remember to mute yourselves except when speaking.

0:39

For members of the public tuning in, in addition to submitting e-testimony, you have the option to join the Zoom link from on the meeting agenda.

0:47

Comments submitted either through email or e-comment before 5 p.m.

0:51

today have been received by staff and available to commissioners for review.

0:55

If you would like to leave an e-comment during the hearing, please do.

0:58

Staff will pull up any e-comments posted after 5 p.m.

1:02

And we will take a moment to review.

1:04

Members of the public participating via Zoom, if you would like to speak on an agenda item, please use the Zoom raise your hand feature when that item begins in order to provide public comments.

1:15

The clerk will call on you and allow you to speak.

1:18

You'll have three minutes to address the commission.

1:20

If you go over your allotted time, you will be asked to make your final comments and will then be muted.

1:26

Tonight's agenda also has more detailed instructions to help you use the raise your hand feature.

1:32

If you wish to speak on a subsequent agenda item, you will need to raise your hand again when that next item begins.

1:38

If there are any interruptions to your video stream, please refresh your browser.

1:42

We'll go ahead and move on to tonight's agenda.

1:45

We do not have any changes.

1:55

Commissioner Boyd.

2:00

Here.

2:02

Commissioner Buckley.

2:08

Commissioner Chase, here.

2:11

Commissioner Cobell.

2:13

Here.

2:14

Commissioner Lindsay.

2:16

Here.

2:18

Commissioner Ogilvie.

2:20

Here.

2:21

Commissioner Bluckybaugh.

2:23

Here.

2:25

Commissioner Wallace.

2:26

Here.

2:28

Commissioner Wong Conley.

2:30

Here.

2:31

Commissioner Yi.

2:32

Here.

2:34

Commissioner Young.

2:35

Here.

2:37

I'm sorry.

2:38

I'm not sure if I came through when you asked if I was here, but I was.

2:41

I think I had my mic off.

2:42

Oh, yeah, we got you.

2:44

Thank you.

2:44

Sorry.

2:45

Okay.

2:46

Commissioner Hernandez.

2:48

Here.

2:50

Commissioner Messius Reed.

2:52

Here.

2:53

We have a quorum.

2:55

Okay, thank you, Greg.

2:57

Um, we will move on to the land acknowledgement.

3:00

Please rise for the opening acknowledgments in honor of Sacramento's Indigenous Peoples and Tribal Lands.

3:09

To the original people of this land, the Nissanon people, the Southern Maidu, Valley and Plains Miwok, Patwin Wintun peoples, and the people of the Wilton Rancheria, Sacramento's only federally recognized tribe.

3:22

May we acknowledge and honor the Native people who came before us and still walk beside us today on these ancestral lands by choosing to gather today in the active practice of acknowledgement and appreciation for Sacramento's indigenous people's history, contributions, and lives.

3:41

Thank you.

3:42

We will move on to the consent calendar.

3:45

Commissioners, uh reminder, if you're abstaining from one of the items, we'll mention so during the roll call vote.

3:51

Madam Clerk, do we have any public comments on this item on the consent calendar?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Cannabis Regulation█████████████████████████████████████████████49%
Procedural██████████████████20%
Public Comments███████████12%
Community Engagement██████6%
Public Safety██████6%
Native American History██2%
Legal██2%
Business Regulation██2%
Ad Hoc Committees1%
Summary of Proceedings

Planning & Design Commission Meeting – May 26, 2022

The Sacramento Planning and Design Commission met via teleconference on Thursday, May 26, 2022, at 5:31 p.m. (adjourned 6:49 p.m.) to consider a consent calendar, receive a director's report (none given), and conduct a public hearing on a conditional use permit for a storefront cannabis dispensary at 6233 Mack Road. The commission approved the dispensary and extended teleconferencing due to the COVID-19 emergency.

Consent Calendar

  • Item 1 – Approval of Minutes (May 12, 2022): Passed 12–0 (Commissioner Macias Reed and Wallace abstained; Commissioner Buckley absent).
  • Item 2 – Teleconferencing Meetings During COVID-19 (30-Day Finding): Passed under the same motion, allowing continued remote meetings per California Government Code §54953(e).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Daphne (resident, District 5): Requested removal of the director's report and item 4 from the agenda, citing lack of proper noticing (less than 72 hours) and concern that the dispensary would be approved prematurely. She later stated the Parkway Neighborhood Association was not notified.
  • Victor Pacito: Supported applicant Robert Jackson, citing his community work with youth and faith-based organizations.
  • Jay Jackson: Supported the project; described applicant as an upstanding business owner with moral principles.
  • Tracy Brooks (Deputy Sheriff, retired): Supported the dispensary, noting robust security discussions with the applicant and a belief it would not negatively impact the community.
  • Leland Washington (Deputy District Attorney): Supported the applicant, emphasizing his integrity and mentorship.
  • John Bishai (retired law enforcement): Supported the applicant, citing high moral character.

Discussion Items

  • Item 4 – 6233 Mack Road Storefront Cannabis Dispensary (P21-044): Staff presented the project: a 2,889-square-foot tenant space in a 64,690-square-foot retail building on 7.6 acres (C-2 zone). The dispensary is within 300 feet of residential zoning and 600 feet of five tobacco retailers and one faith congregation. Staff recommended approval. Commissioners disclosed meetings with the applicant consistent with the staff report.
  • Key discussion points:
    • Commissioner Boyd questioned the extent of community outreach; applicant stated meetings with Mac Road Partnership, Meadow View, and Valley High associations, though Boyd (board member of Meadow View) did not recall a presentation.
    • Commissioner Yee raised concerns about the chain-link fence for product transfer (condition B32) versus staff's decorative tubular steel requirement; staff noted police department approval but said clarification may be needed.
    • Commissioner Yee also inquired about delivery hours and noise impact on adjacent residences; applicant confirmed deliveries occur only during daylight hours, with security present.
    • Commissioner Chase confirmed no smoking on premises under current code.
    • Commissioner Covill expressed support, noting improved security and reduced loitering.
  • Commissioner Pluckebaum also mentioned a city council subcommittee (PMPE) meeting on May 24 that recommended changes to commission rules, potentially affecting ad hoc committees.

Key Outcomes

  • Item 4 – Approval (12–0): Motion by Commissioner Pluckebaum, second by Commissioner Chase. The commission approved:
    • Item A: Environmental Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 – Existing Facilities).
    • Item B: Conditional Use Permit for a storefront cannabis dispensary (with delivery).
    • Conditions of approval include a security plan, operating hours 7 a.m. to 9 p.m., and an enclosed loading area.
  • Appeal process: Any party may appeal the decision within 10 days; filing fee is $750.
  • Consent Calendar approved as noted.
  • Director's Report – none given.

Meeting Transcript

All right, good evening, everyone. Welcome to the City of Sacramento's Planning and Design Commission hearing. The date is Thursday, May 26, 2022. For staff, commissioners, and applicants logged into the meeting, please remember to mute yourselves except when speaking. For members of the public tuning in, in addition to submitting e-testimony, you have the option to join the Zoom link from on the meeting agenda. Comments submitted either through email or e-comment before 5 p.m. today have been received by staff and available to commissioners for review. If you would like to leave an e-comment during the hearing, please do. Staff will pull up any e-comments posted after 5 p.m. And we will take a moment to review. Members of the public participating via Zoom, if you would like to speak on an agenda item, please use the Zoom raise your hand feature when that item begins in order to provide public comments. The clerk will call on you and allow you to speak. You'll have three minutes to address the commission. If you go over your allotted time, you will be asked to make your final comments and will then be muted. Tonight's agenda also has more detailed instructions to help you use the raise your hand feature. If you wish to speak on a subsequent agenda item, you will need to raise your hand again when that next item begins. If there are any interruptions to your video stream, please refresh your browser. We'll go ahead and move on to tonight's agenda. We do not have any changes. Commissioner Boyd. Here. Commissioner Buckley. Commissioner Chase, here. Commissioner Cobell. Here. Commissioner Lindsay. Here. Commissioner Ogilvie. Here. Commissioner Bluckybaugh. Here. Commissioner Wallace. Here. Commissioner Wong Conley. Here. Commissioner Yi. Here. Commissioner Young. Here. I'm sorry. I'm not sure if I came through when you asked if I was here, but I was. I think I had my mic off. Oh, yeah, we got you. Thank you. Sorry. Okay. Commissioner Hernandez. Here. Commissioner Messius Reed. Here.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com