OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Sacramento Preservation Commission Meeting - May 18, 2016

Preservation CommissionWednesday, May 18, 2016
BodySacramento, California
SessionPreservation Commission
DateWednesday, May 18, 2016
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:21

Good evening, everyone.

0:22

I call the um Wednesday, May 18th Preservation Commission meeting to order.

0:29

Um with that, uh we'll do roll call.

0:33

Commissioner Moffat.

0:35

Here.

0:35

Commissioner Marshak.

0:37

Here.

0:37

Commissioner Bounds.

0:38

Here.

0:39

Commissioner Fuller?

0:40

Here.

0:40

Commissioner Huck?

0:41

Here.

0:41

Commissioner Piner.

0:42

Here.

0:43

Commissioner Whitelamb.

0:44

Here.

0:45

All present.

0:46

Have a quorum.

0:48

Excellent.

0:49

And before we continue on to the meeting, I would like to introduce.

0:55

There she is.

0:56

I couldn't find her.

0:58

We are very pleased.

1:00

I'm very pleased to be able to introduce our new planning director for the City of Sacramento, Kate Gillespie.

1:08

And she's got a good, she's a planner, but she's got a real good preservation background as well.

1:13

So Kate, why don't you say a few words?

1:16

Thank you.

1:17

Well, I just want to tell you I'm delighted to be here.

1:21

We have such stellar staff, and I've really been impressed by the caliber of city staff available to you.

1:31

I did want to let you know that I'm available to meet with any of you on an individual basis.

1:38

So please feel free to email me or call me and I'll make myself available for coffee or meeting after work.

1:47

So please feel free.

1:50

I'm looking forward to working with all of you.

1:52

And Kate came from most recently from New Orleans, but she's done a lot of work in the Bay Area.

1:58

So she's coming from the one flood prone levy down to another.

2:07

Excellent.

2:08

Thank you.

2:09

Thank you.

2:14

All right.

2:15

So that's great.

2:18

Well, uh before we move on, I'll just uh make some uh housekeeping items here.

2:23

The copy of tonight's agenda is available at the back of the room outside the door for you those of you who are interested.

2:31

Um so in hearing an item on the the agenda tonight, um we will um move through it according to the agenda.

2:40

We've had a little bit of a change uh in which we'll be taking things out of order.

2:46

Um uh under public hearing, we'll be switching items two and three.

2:52

So we'll be high hearing item three and then item two.

2:57

There are no other uh changes to the agenda this evening.

3:01

Um there are speaker slips in the back of the room for any uh uh members in the audience that wish to talk about any items on the agenda.

3:13

Um so we'll go through the hearing items.

3:16

Um they'll be initiated by a brief discussion by the staff presentation, followed by uh uh questions of the commission of the staff.

3:24

After that, uh we'll have the opportunity to hear from the applicant if they choose to make a presentation.

3:31

Um that in turn will be followed by questions of the applicant by the commission, and then finally, if there's any members of the audience that wish to speak on a particular um agenda item, um they'll be called and uh able to address the the commission.

3:50

Um the members of the audience are also able to address the commission items that are not on the agenda.

3:57

Um that is listed as item seven, public comments, items not on the agenda.

4:04

So again, if you uh wish to uh address the commission in that regard, uh fill out a speaker slip in the back of the room um and bring it up to the uh clerk here on the left-hand side of the room to you.

4:19

Um there will be a two-minute limit to public comments.

4:23

And um just a reminder that we ask you to turn off your cell phones, paging devices, things like that that uh might make noise and uh disrupt your fellow uh meeting attendees.

4:34

So um with that we'll proceed on to the agenda.

4:38

Items back to the order of the agenda.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation████████████████████20%
Architecture█████████████13%
Urban Design██████████10%
Architectural Review████████8%
Procedural██████6%
Preservation Commission██████6%
Public Engagement██████6%
Public Works█████5%
Community Engagement█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Sacramento Preservation Commission Meeting - May 18, 2016

The Sacramento Preservation Commission met on Wednesday, May 18, 2016, at 5:31 p.m. in the Council Chambers of New City Hall, 915 I Street. All seven commissioners were present. The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m. The agenda included a consent calendar, two public hearings, three staff report items, and public comments both on and off the agenda.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes (April 13, 2016): Passed unanimously (7:0:0) on a motion by Commissioner Whitelam, seconded by Commissioner Huck.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 2 – 629 J Food Hall: No public testimony received.
  • Item 3 – Matsui Alley Barn/Garage Nomination: William Burg spoke in support of nomination, citing the barn’s history as a workplace for plasterer Mannix and its rarity as a surviving accessory structure. Property owner’s attorney, Michael Cook, argued against listing, stating the barn is not unique, that similar structures exist in the neighborhood, and that demolition would allow a carriage house to reactivate the alley and provide parking.
  • Item 5 – Discretionary Project Noticing: Three speakers addressed deficiencies in the current noticing system:
    • William Burg noted that mailed notices often arrive too late for community organizations, and that developers frequently fail to conduct meaningful outreach.
    • Margaret Buss, a 26-year resident of Boulevard Park, emphasized that neighborhood associations are voluntary and cannot substitute for city notification to property owners.
    • Deborah Condon urged that property owners within 500 feet be notified by mail early in the process, not just at the 10-day legal notice stage.
  • Item 7 – Public Comments (Matters Not on the Agenda): Six speakers addressed the future of the City Cemetery gardens, particularly the rose garden. They requested transparency, inclusion of volunteer garden coordinators and external experts (e.g., old-rose specialist Greg Lowry), and creation of a Cemetery Treatment Plan or Cultural Landscape Plan before forming a Technical Advisory Committee.

Discussion Items

  • Item 2 – PB16-016 629 J Food Hall: Staff presented a removable glass stair enclosure on the 7th Street side and a mezzanine on the north end of the banking hall. The applicant (Jeff Stoll, Silver Still Architects) requested flexibility on mezzanine notches, stating that deep recesses per staff’s recommendation would “kill the project” due to business and health-department concerns. Commissioner questions focused on the stair enclosure height, mezzanine structural connections, and bicycle parking. The commission debated whether the project was ready for final approval.
  • Item 3 – M16-055 Nomination of Matsui Alley Barn/Garage: Preservation Director Roberta Deering presented the nomination, citing the barn (built with the house ca. 1900) as a rare surviving horse stable in the Capitol Mansions Historic District, meeting eligibility criteria for a landmark. The property owner’s attorney opposed, arguing it has low utility and is not the best or last example. Commissioners discussed the structure’s integrity and the demolition review process if listed.
  • Item 4 – P15-040 Sacramento Railyards: Staff (Teresa Haenggi) reviewed proposed amendments to the Railyards Specific Plan, Special Planning District, and Design Guidelines to accommodate a soccer stadium and Kaiser hospital. Key elements: creating a transition zone north of the central shops, with building heights of 85 to 100 feet; requiring new buildings to be 20 feet from historic structures; and relocating but retaining the water tower. Commissioners questioned the transfer table preservation, the lack of massing studies, the impact of tall buildings on views of the historic shops, and the appropriate height for Lot 40 near the depot. Public comment was not taken on this item.
  • Item 5 – Report Back on Discretionary Project Noticing: Urban Design Manager Bruce Monighan outlined current early outreach practices (routing lists to neighborhood associations, website project lists) and described a planned computer system for electronic notification. Commissioners supported the automated system and suggested using tools like Nextdoor. The report was received and filed.
  • Item 6 – Director Report: Roberta Deering announced her retirement at the end of August 2016 and that the senior planner preservation position is open. She also noted that Chairman Chad Moffet had been nominated for reappointment, and the Bellevue Apartments were formally listed on the National Register.
  • Item 8 – Member Comments: Commissioner Piner requested a report back on the City Cemetery Technical Advisory Committee. Commissioner Huck highlighted the 40th Anniversary of Preservation in Sacramento (banners, exhibit, May 21 reception) and read a City Council resolution recognizing 40 years of preservation and 50 years of the National Historic Preservation Act. Commissioner Marshak requested 3-minute public comment limits and expressed a preference for review-and-comment meetings before final actions on complex projects.

Key Outcomes

  • Item 2 – 629 J Food Hall: Approved with amended conditions (motion by Whitelam, second by Piner; vote 6:0:1, Commissioner Fuller recused). Conditions included: the mezzanine may extend to the third bay on the north end, with work to continue with staff; the stair enclosure shall be no higher than the base of the columns and made of a non-glass transparent material; the dining area enclosure to apply only to the 7th Street entry; and bicycle parking details to be resolved with staff.
  • Item 3 – Matsui Alley Barn/Garage Nomination: The commission voted unanimously (6:0:1, Commissioner Piner recused) to forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for listing the barn and garage as a Landmark and Contributing Resource in the Capitol Mansions Historic District.
  • Item 4 – Sacramento Railyards: No action taken; the commission provided review and comment for staff and applicant to consider. Commissioners requested further detail on massing, transition zone heights, transfer table protection, and lot 40 height restrictions.
  • Item 5 – Discretionary Project Noticing: Received and filed. The commission supported development of an automated electronic notification system.
  • Item 6 – Director Report: Received and filed.
  • Item 7 – Public Comments: Heard; no action.
  • Item 8 – Member Comments: Commissioner Piner’s request for a report back on the City Cemetery Technical Advisory Committee will be placed on a future agenda.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, everyone. I call the um Wednesday, May 18th Preservation Commission meeting to order. Um with that, uh we'll do roll call. Commissioner Moffat. Here. Commissioner Marshak. Here. Commissioner Bounds. Here. Commissioner Fuller? Here. Commissioner Huck? Here. Commissioner Piner. Here. Commissioner Whitelamb. Here. All present. Have a quorum. Excellent. And before we continue on to the meeting, I would like to introduce. There she is. I couldn't find her. We are very pleased. I'm very pleased to be able to introduce our new planning director for the City of Sacramento, Kate Gillespie. And she's got a good, she's a planner, but she's got a real good preservation background as well. So Kate, why don't you say a few words? Thank you. Well, I just want to tell you I'm delighted to be here. We have such stellar staff, and I've really been impressed by the caliber of city staff available to you. I did want to let you know that I'm available to meet with any of you on an individual basis. So please feel free to email me or call me and I'll make myself available for coffee or meeting after work. So please feel free. I'm looking forward to working with all of you. And Kate came from most recently from New Orleans, but she's done a lot of work in the Bay Area. So she's coming from the one flood prone levy down to another. Excellent. Thank you. Thank you. All right. So that's great. Well, uh before we move on, I'll just uh make some uh housekeeping items here. The copy of tonight's agenda is available at the back of the room outside the door for you those of you who are interested. Um so in hearing an item on the the agenda tonight, um we will um move through it according to the agenda. We've had a little bit of a change uh in which we'll be taking things out of order. Um uh under public hearing, we'll be switching items two and three. So we'll be high hearing item three and then item two. There are no other uh changes to the agenda this evening. Um there are speaker slips in the back of the room for any uh uh members in the audience that wish to talk about any items on the agenda. Um so we'll go through the hearing items.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com