OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Preservation Commission Meeting - August 15, 2018

Preservation CommissionWednesday, August 15, 2018
BodySacramento, California
SessionPreservation Commission
DateWednesday, August 15, 2018
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
10:53

To let you folks know, we are waiting for another commissioner who is arriving just very shortly.

11:01

Thank you.

11:56

Good evening.

11:58

The August 15th, 2018 meeting of the City of Sacramento's Preservation Commission is called to order.

12:03

Before we start, I'll review our procedures.

12:06

Copies of the agenda for tonight's meeting are on the kiosk just outside the door.

12:10

The commission will refer to each of the items according to the order provided on the agenda.

12:15

And there is a change to the agenda.

12:16

Agenda item number three is being continued to the September fifth meeting of the Commission.

12:21

And note that is an unusual meeting date for us.

12:24

It's earlier in the month than it would normally be.

13:48

Commissioner Miller.

13:50

Commissioner Moffat.

13:52

Commissioner Velania.

13:54

Commissioner Whitlam.

13:56

And Chair Marshak.

13:58

Here.

14:00

Very good.

14:02

First item on the agenda is our consent calendar, and there is a single item under consent, and that is approval of the minutes of the July fifth, twenty eighteen meeting, which are in your agenda packet in draft form.

14:15

And we need a motion to approve.

14:18

Are there any comments on those minutes?

14:21

Corrections.

15:00

Commissioner Vellagna.

15:02

Move we approve the minutes with uh your revision.

15:06

Thank you.

15:07

A second, please.

15:12

Commissioner Bounds.

15:13

I second the motion.

15:14

Thank you.

15:14

Any discussion of the agenda of the uh motion.

15:19

Seeing none, uh, we'll do a voice vote.

15:22

All in favor.

15:24

Aye.

15:24

Aye.

15:25

All opposed.

15:27

Any abstentions?

15:28

Abstain.

15:31

Very good.

15:32

Thank you.

15:36

So the item carries.

15:39

All right.

15:39

Next on our agenda are public comments.

15:42

Matter is not on the agenda, and I have a speaker slip from William Berg.

15:50

Good evening.

15:50

On behalf of the Board of Preservation Sacramento, I'd like to present the commissioners and city staff with the draft nomination that we just completed for the 700 block of K Street Historic District.

16:04

We've been working in conjunction with the property owners for the past few months who initially inquired about how to get uh landmark plaques for all of the buildings on the block, only to discover that three were listed landmarks and the other ones had been evaluated and decided they couldn't be eligible as individual landmarks.

16:23

But under subsequent evaluation and also looking at the other historic contexts of the of that block, they were all except for one building which has lost all of its its um front wall eligible as contributors to a historic district.

16:38

They all share common context geographically.

16:40

It's the the half block of the 700 block of K Street, which is one of a small number of remaining city blocks that retain the character of a historic downtown Sacramento Street during the early 20th century, with uh shared party walls, storefronts on the ground floor, which are often subject to change.

17:01

Uh but when you go above the the ground floor, the architectural character is uh a variety.

17:07

There are many different styles on that block, but all with a very similar rhythm with us uh and and they're all connected by the that context of ground floor retail with typically residential uses above.

17:19

And the restoration and rehab of the property, including the addition of the hardened on the alley, in some ways has actually enhanced the uh historic integrity of the properties by removing later exterior coatings and um non-historic features and restoration of elements like the Frank Carson mural on tower records.

17:39

Uh so with the uh support of DNS development or uh seven, I think the property owner record is the 700 block commercial LP limited partnership.

17:49

Uh, we'd like to submit a hard copy as well as just digital copy of the nomination for consideration in inclusion in the Sacramento Register of Historic and Cultural Resources.

17:59

Thank you.

18:00

Thank you.

18:03

Are there any other members of the public that would like to bring up an agenda item that's not on the agenda?

18:10

Seeing none, we'll close item two and move on to our public hearing items.

18:16

Uh skipping three because that's being continued.

18:19

Item number four, uh 2812 S Street vacant lot with landmark status.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████60%
Public Comments███████9%
Architecture███████9%
Land Use Planning████5%
Planning and Zoning████5%
Urban Design███4%
Public Engagement███4%
Procedural██2%
Parking1%
Summary of Proceedings

Preservation Commission Meeting - August 15, 2018

The Sacramento Preservation Commission held a regular meeting on August 15, 2018, at 5:30 PM in the City Hall Council Chamber. All six commissioners were present. The meeting covered a consent calendar, public comments, two public hearings, a staff report, and the director's report. Notable actions included approval of prior meeting minutes with an amendment, removal of landmark designation for a vacant lot, and a recommendation to deny a six-unit residential project.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes of the July 25, 2018 Meeting: Moved, seconded, and carried (Valania/Bowns; 5:0:1; Moffett abstained) to approve the minutes with an amendment to Item 8. (Note: The action recorded in the minutes refers to approving the June 20, 2018 minutes, but the agenda item cited July 25; the motion as passed amended Item 8.)

Public Comments & Testimony

  • William Burg (on behalf of Preservation Sacramento) presented a draft nomination for the 700 block of K Street Historic District and submitted it to the commission and staff.

Discussion Items

  • Item 3: PB17-067 I & 23rd Multifamily Development – Continued to the September 5, 2018 meeting.
  • Item 4: M18-015 2812 S Street Vacant Lot with Landmark Status – Staff presented a request to remove landmark designation. The commission held a public hearing and unanimously approved (Whitelam/Valania; 6:0:0) a motion recommending City Council to determine the removal is CEQA-exempt and to pass an ordinance removing the designation.
  • Item 5: P17-046 318 U Street Tentative Map and Site Plan & Design Review – The project proposed subdividing a 0.21-acre parcel into six lots and constructing six attached single-unit dwellings. After staff and applicant presentations and public testimony, a motion to recommend denial (Moffett/Valania; 5:0:1; Whitelam abstained) was carried, as the commission found the project did not meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The motion included a conditional caveat that approval would be acceptable if standards were met, but the recommendation was denial.
  • Item 6: M18-018 Eastern Star Building Hotel Adaptive Reuse (Preliminary Concept) – Staff presented a concept design for adaptive reuse of the 2719 K Street building as a 120-140 room hotel. The commission reviewed and commented on the design. Public comment was heard from Margaret Piner.
  • Item 7: Director’s Report – Received and filed.
  • Item 8: Member Comments – No items were announced.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved minutes of the previous meeting (as amended).
  • Recommended to City Council removal of landmark designation for 2812 S Street vacant lot (unanimous).
  • Recommended denial of the 318 U Street subdivision and development project (5-0-1).
  • Provided comments on the Eastern Star Building adaptive reuse concept.
  • Meeting adjourned at 7:58 PM.

Meeting Transcript

To let you folks know, we are waiting for another commissioner who is arriving just very shortly. Thank you. Good evening. The August 15th, 2018 meeting of the City of Sacramento's Preservation Commission is called to order. Before we start, I'll review our procedures. Copies of the agenda for tonight's meeting are on the kiosk just outside the door. The commission will refer to each of the items according to the order provided on the agenda. And there is a change to the agenda. Agenda item number three is being continued to the September fifth meeting of the Commission. And note that is an unusual meeting date for us. It's earlier in the month than it would normally be. Commissioner Miller. Commissioner Moffat. Commissioner Velania. Commissioner Whitlam. And Chair Marshak. Here. Very good. First item on the agenda is our consent calendar, and there is a single item under consent, and that is approval of the minutes of the July fifth, twenty eighteen meeting, which are in your agenda packet in draft form. And we need a motion to approve. Are there any comments on those minutes? Corrections. Commissioner Vellagna. Move we approve the minutes with uh your revision. Thank you. A second, please. Commissioner Bounds. I second the motion. Thank you. Any discussion of the agenda of the uh motion. Seeing none, uh, we'll do a voice vote. All in favor. Aye. Aye. All opposed. Any abstentions? Abstain. Very good. Thank you. So the item carries. All right. Next on our agenda are public comments. Matter is not on the agenda, and I have a speaker slip from William Berg. Good evening. On behalf of the Board of Preservation Sacramento, I'd like to present the commissioners and city staff with the draft nomination that we just completed for the 700 block of K Street Historic District. We've been working in conjunction with the property owners for the past few months who initially inquired about how to get uh landmark plaques for all of the buildings on the block, only to discover that three were listed landmarks and the other ones had been evaluated and decided they couldn't be eligible as individual landmarks. But under subsequent evaluation and also looking at the other historic contexts of the of that block, they were all except for one building which has lost all of its its um front wall eligible as contributors to a historic district. They all share common context geographically. It's the the half block of the 700 block of K Street, which is one of a small number of remaining city blocks that retain the character of a historic downtown Sacramento Street during the early 20th century, with uh shared party walls, storefronts on the ground floor, which are often subject to change. Uh but when you go above the the ground floor, the architectural character is uh a variety.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com