Preservation Commission Regular Meeting - September 16, 2020
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Preservation Commission Regular Meeting - September 16, 2020
The Sacramento Preservation Commission held a regular meeting on September 16, 2020, from 5:30 p.m. to 9:22 p.m. via teleconference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The commission considered two landmark nominations, a historic cemetery preservation assessment and signage program, a major station area master plan, and a director's comment letter. All votes were unanimous (7-0) on action items, and discussion items were received and filed.
Consent Calendar
- Item 1: Approval of Minutes (June 17, 2020): The commission unanimously approved the minutes of the June 17, 2020 meeting (motion by Valania, second by Miller-Cruiess; 7-0).
Public Comments & Testimony
- Public Comments – Matters Not on the Agenda: No speakers were queued. One caller, Glenn Gennard, was redirected to the public hearing for Item 2.
Discussion Items
-
Item 2: Ordinance Listing 1810 S Street (Nathaniel Colley and Associates Law Office) as a Landmark: Staff presented the nomination, highlighting Nathaniel Colley as Sacramento's first African American attorney and architect James C. Dodd's design. Property owner Glenn Gennard testified in strong support, describing Colley's personal impact. No other public comments. The commission voted unanimously (7-0) to recommend City Council adoption of the ordinance and CEQA exemption.
-
Item 3: Ordinance Listing 3135 D Street (Guisto Family Residence) as a Landmark: Staff presented the nomination for the 1893 Queen Anne home associated with the Guisto family, early asparagus growers. One public comment (Jennifer Holden) was mistakenly directed to Item 4 and later corrected. No opposition. Commissioner Bowns noted grammatical errors in the staff report to be corrected. The commission voted unanimously (7-0) to recommend City Council adoption.
-
Item 4: Historic City Cemetery: Preservation Assessment, 5-Year Plan, and Signage Program: Staff presented the draft technical assessment by conservator Catherine Unsch, focusing on hardscape and monument conditions, and a proposed signage program. Strong public testimony (approximately 15 speakers) from volunteers, rosarians, and community members expressed concerns about the plan's potential to remove the historic rose garden, criticized summer pruning of roses, and alleged neglect of volunteers. Speakers emphasized the garden's cultural and National Register value. Commissioners recommended reevaluating the property as a cultural landscape, engaging a historic landscape architect, and clarifying the city's vision. The item was received and filed without formal action.
-
Item 5: Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan Final Public Draft: Project manager Gregory Taylor presented an update on the area plan, including a new regenerative utility center, open space designs, and phasing. Commissioners offered comments on design consistency, ADA consideration, and specific plan amendments. No public comments were received. The item was received and filed.
-
Item 6: Preservation Director’s Comment Letter to SHPO Regarding Nisei VFW Post 8985 National Register Nomination: The commission received and filed the director's letter submitted to the State Historical Resources Commission.
Key Outcomes
- Items 2 & 3: Unanimous votes (7-0) to forward landmark nominations to the City Council with recommendations for approval.
- Item 4: The commission recommended staff pursue a cultural landscape report, engage a historic landscape architect, and improve communication with volunteers. No formal action was taken.
- Item 5: The commission received the plan and provided comments for consideration before final City Council review in December 2020.
- Director’s Report: Announced that the city received a 2020 Excellence Award from the National Alliance of Preservation Commissions and a forthcoming award from the California Preservation Foundation for its historic district plans. The commission also noted that members serving beyond term limits continue until reappointed.
Meeting Transcript
Yes. I did. Yes. Hello, Testing. Still having an egg. So I have this. Yes, you think that little speaker right there. Yes, there we go. Okay, going. Still haven't been able to do that. Able to hear what I'm saying. That is the background music in Council Chambers. Thank you. And our new world of Zoom. So this is the preservation commission of meeting of September the sixth September the sixteenth, twenty twenty. Um I'm going to hand things over to our chair, Jackie Whitelum, to uh to launch the meeting discussion. Okay. Um, I can be heard, correct? Because I was muted before, but can I be heard? Can you hear me? I can hear you. Right. Okay. Um, so Carson, don't you usually start by doing the roll call? Yes, I usually defer to you to ask me to do so, and then I can do so right now. Uh Commissioner Bones, if you could each uh unmute yourselves as you uh answer I. Commissioner Carter. Commissioner Carter, you are still muted. Thank you, sir. Commissioner Lemon. Hi. Commissioner Miller. Present. Commissioner Miller Cruz. Present. And Commissioner Volania? Present. And Chair Whitelum. Present. Full quorum. Okay. Um we have one item on the consent calendar. It's approval of the preservation commission minutes. Um your minutes from the it's the minutes of the June 17th meeting. That's correct. So does anybody have any comments or can I have a motion to approve them? So I move that we approve the June commission meeting minutes. I'll second it. Okay. Carson, do we do a roll call?
openpublica.com