OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Sacramento Preservation Commission Meeting - December 16, 2020

Preservation CommissionWednesday, December 16, 2020
BodySacramento, California
SessionPreservation Commission
DateWednesday, December 16, 2020
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
1:23

One of the commission members has chucked into the meeting queue so far.

1:28

Just kind of odd.

1:30

Only one.

4:01

So bear with us a bit longer.

4:03

Might be another couple minutes or so.

5:47

We're still waiting for our chair and for a couple more members of the commission continue bearing with us for a bit longer.

7:32

We're waiting for maybe one more commissioner to join us.

7:37

Commissioner Bowls expected to join the meeting.

10:02

Chair Whitelum, I'm going to ask whether you think we should start the meeting without Commissioner Bowns.

10:08

I know that there are a couple items where we're gonna be close and having the required quorum to take an action, so I've been I've been waiting a bit.

10:21

Can we wait a few moments longer, a few minutes longer?

10:24

Sure.

10:24

Are we did she um did she indicate she was going to be here?

10:29

Yes, I received uh an affirmative response.

10:34

Okay, yeah, I we can wait a few more minutes.

10:37

Um the others of you who are waiting, just bear with us.

10:42

Uh we have kind of an un unexpected uh delay here.

10:45

We want to make sure that we have the necessary quorum to conduct our business.

10:51

So continue waiting.

10:54

And I I think hopefully in another few minutes we'll be able to start the meeting.

10:59

Okay.

15:00

Well it looks like she's just signed on.

15:04

Okay, I don't see her in the queue yet.

15:17

Carson, she actually shows up as a participant now.

15:33

Yes, I see her now.

15:34

Thank you very much.

15:36

Okay, we will start the meeting in thirty seconds to allow for the recordation of the meeting.

15:43

We can have that 30-second pause.

16:22

Okay.

16:23

Are we on, Carson?

16:26

We are on, yes.

16:28

Okay, then I'm going to call this meeting of the president of the uh December sixteenth, twenty twenty meeting of the preservation commission to order.

16:38

And um we are in response to the governor's executive order and the resolution declaring existence of a local emergency relating to COVID.

16:49

Um we're holding this meeting as a teleconference meeting.

16:52

A dedicated phone line has been established for public participation during the meeting related to specific agenda item or matters not on the agenda.

17:03

So members of the public are encouraged to submit their public comments via e-comment through the city's official website.

17:11

And when we get to the public hearing items, there will also be a telephone number um that I'll announce um that they can dial in.

17:22

And so I guess with that I will proceed.

17:29

And so let's proceed with roll call, Carson.

17:33

Commission members says I call your names.

17:36

Um be sure to unmute yourselves so that we can hear your actual uh voiced uh assent.

17:44

Commissioner Bounce.

18:42

But we do not hear you at all.

18:58

I hear something.

19:00

We hear some background noise, but we do not hear your voice yet.

19:08

Okay.

19:09

Uh let's we see you now, Commissioner Bounce.

19:15

But we cannot hear you.

19:22

Cannot hear you at all.

19:24

And you are unmuted here on my uh my screen.

19:29

So I don't believe the problem is here with us.

19:34

So at any rate.

19:36

So we will we will go forward in the roll call.

19:39

Uh Commissioner Carter, if you would unmute yourself.

19:42

I'm here.

19:43

Thank you, sir.

19:45

Commissioner Miller.

19:46

Here.

19:48

Commissioner Miller Cruz.

19:50

Here.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████53%
Procedural█████████11%
Community Engagement██████7%
Public Hearing████5%
Architecture████5%
Public Comments████5%
Land Use Planning███4%
COVID-19 Response██2%
Preservation Commission██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Sacramento Preservation Commission Meeting - December 16, 2020

The Sacramento Preservation Commission held a regular meeting on December 16, 2020, starting at 5:43 p.m. (delayed from the scheduled 5:30 p.m. start due to a quorum issue) and adjourning at 8:00 p.m. The meeting was conducted via teleconference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Commissioners present: Chair Jacqueline Whitelam, Vice Chair Alice Valania, Caru Bowns (audio issues initially), William Carter, Ryan Miller, Christine Miller-Cruiess. Commissioner David Lemon was excused. The commission considered a consent calendar, three public hearings (landmark designation, rooftop sign, and a third-party appeal), and a discussion calendar item.

Consent Calendar

  • Item 1 – Approval of November 18, 2020 Minutes: Motion by Commissioner Miller, seconded by Commissioner Valania. Passed unanimously (6-0).
  • Item 2 – Approval of 2021 Meeting Calendar: Motion by Commissioner Carter, seconded by Commissioner Miller. Passed unanimously (6-0).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comments were received on the consent calendar or on any of the public hearing items (Items 3, 4, 5). No callers dialed in for those items.
  • For Item 5 (Third-Party Appeal), the appellant's representative, Catherine Strait, argued that the proposed 1928 21st Street apartment project violates the Secretary of the Interior Standards (especially Standards 1 and 9) and the Poverty Ridge Historic District Plan. She claimed the building's setbacks, massing, and two-facade design are incompatible with the district, and that the project would obscure adjacent contributing resources. She also raised concerns about parking, trash service, and inadequate notice to neighbors. The appellant, Michael West, owns the adjacent property at 1922 21st Street.
  • The applicant's architect, Mike Malinowski, and owner Mike Gile responded that they had conducted neighborhood outreach and made design changes based on feedback, and that the appellant declined to meet. They asserted the project is compatible and compliant with standards.

Discussion Items

  • Item 3 – Ordinance Listing Nisei VFW Hall Post 8985 (1515 4th Street) as a Landmark: Staff presented the building's history as a restaurant built by African American entrepreneur Felix Flowers, later acquired by Japanese American veterans (Nisei) in 1955 for a VFW post. The Preservation Director noted it is one of the few remaining pre-redevelopment buildings associated with Sacramento's Japanese American community. No opposition. Commission unanimously recommended City Council approve the landmark designation (6-0).
  • Item 4 – Forty Acres (Oak Park) Placemaking Roof-top Sign (3428-3436 3rd Avenue): Staff described a 30-foot-wide by 11-foot-tall yellow neon sign on the historic Lewis Building, set back 10 feet from the parapet. The sign is part of the 40 Acres complex, revitalized by St. Hope Development. Conditions included limited illumination hours and 3,800 Kelvin color temperature. Commissioners Miller and Miller-Cruiess recused themselves (Miller – professional conflict; Miller-Cruiess – neighbor relation). The commission approved the recommendation to the Planning and Design Commission (5-0-2).
  • Item 5 – Third Party Appeal: 1928 21st Street Apartments (Poverty Ridge Historic District): This was an appeal of the Preservation Director's approval of a six-unit, three-story apartment building on a 0.07-acre corner lot. Staff argued the project complies with the Secretary of the Interior Standards and the Housing Accountability Act. The appellant opposed, citing incompatible setbacks, massing, and two facades. Commissioner Miller recused (firm worked with architect); Chair Whitelam recused (was hearing officer). Commissioner Bowns, Valania, and Carter expressed support. The commission voted to approve the project and deny the appeal (5-0-1, with Miller recused). A corrigendum to update the flood finding to the 2020 resolution was included.
  • Item 6 – Discussion Calendar: The Los Angeles African American Heritage Initiative Proposal: Preservation Director Carson Anderson reported on a December 1, 2020 online forum he attended. The initiative aims to increase recognition of African American heritage in Los Angeles, addressing low representation (only 2% of city monuments reference African American history). Topics included alternatives to formal landmarking, design integrity challenges, and community engagement. The commission reviewed and commented; a written synopsis is expected.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Calendar: Approved minutes and 2021 meeting calendar (both 6-0).
  • Item 3: Unanimous recommendation to City Council to adopt an ordinance listing the Nisei VFW Hall as a local landmark (6-0).
  • Item 4: Recommended approval of the Forty Acres rooftop sign to the Planning and Design Commission (5-0-2, with two recusals).
  • Item 5: Approved the project and denied the third-party appeal (5-0-1). The project will proceed with a corrected flood finding.
  • Item 6: Reviewed and commented on the Los Angeles African American Heritage Initiative; future discussion expected.
  • Director's Report: Noted COVID-19 impacts on city operations, updates on the General Plan update (including a revised land use map to be presented to City Council on January 5, 2021, and a Preservation Commission discussion on January 20, 2021), and upcoming nominations for Thomas Jefferson School and North Sacramento School.
  • Commissioner Comments: Chair Whitelam reported on a chairs/vice-chairs meeting that resulted in recommendations to the City Council regarding board and commission rules and procedures.

Meeting Transcript

One of the commission members has chucked into the meeting queue so far. Just kind of odd. Only one. So bear with us a bit longer. Might be another couple minutes or so. We're still waiting for our chair and for a couple more members of the commission continue bearing with us for a bit longer. We're waiting for maybe one more commissioner to join us. Commissioner Bowls expected to join the meeting. Chair Whitelum, I'm going to ask whether you think we should start the meeting without Commissioner Bowns. I know that there are a couple items where we're gonna be close and having the required quorum to take an action, so I've been I've been waiting a bit. Can we wait a few moments longer, a few minutes longer? Sure. Are we did she um did she indicate she was going to be here? Yes, I received uh an affirmative response. Okay, yeah, I we can wait a few more minutes. Um the others of you who are waiting, just bear with us. Uh we have kind of an un unexpected uh delay here. We want to make sure that we have the necessary quorum to conduct our business. So continue waiting. And I I think hopefully in another few minutes we'll be able to start the meeting. Okay. Well it looks like she's just signed on. Okay, I don't see her in the queue yet. Carson, she actually shows up as a participant now. Yes, I see her now. Thank you very much. Okay, we will start the meeting in thirty seconds to allow for the recordation of the meeting. We can have that 30-second pause. Okay. Are we on, Carson? We are on, yes. Okay, then I'm going to call this meeting of the president of the uh December sixteenth, twenty twenty meeting of the preservation commission to order. And um we are in response to the governor's executive order and the resolution declaring existence of a local emergency relating to COVID. Um we're holding this meeting as a teleconference meeting. A dedicated phone line has been established for public participation during the meeting related to specific agenda item or matters not on the agenda. So members of the public are encouraged to submit their public comments via e-comment through the city's official website. And when we get to the public hearing items, there will also be a telephone number um that I'll announce um that they can dial in. And so I guess with that I will proceed. And so let's proceed with roll call, Carson. Commission members says I call your names. Um be sure to unmute yourselves so that we can hear your actual uh voiced uh assent. Commissioner Bounce. But we do not hear you at all. I hear something. We hear some background noise, but we do not hear your voice yet. Okay. Uh let's we see you now, Commissioner Bounce. But we cannot hear you. Cannot hear you at all. And you are unmuted here on my uh my screen.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com