Sacramento County Planning Commission Meeting - May 16, 2024: Approval of Cold Storage Truck Parking and FirstNet Wireless Facility
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Sacramento County Planning Commission Meeting - May 16, 2024
The Sacramento County Planning Commission convened on May 16, 2024 (note: the meeting transcript identifies the date as May 6, 2024; the provided timestamp is used per instruction). The commission considered two agenda items: a development plan review for a cold storage truck parking expansion and a use permit/special development permit for a public safety wireless communication facility. Both items were approved unanimously with conditions.
Item 1: Development Plan Review – U.S. Cold Storage at Southgate Industrial Park (3100 52nd Avenue)
- Presentation: Planner David Oriero presented the proposal to add 26 new semi-truck parking stalls (net increase of 18 after removing 8 existing stalls), site landscaping, and a stormwater quality basin accessory to an existing 145,002-square-foot cold storage building. The project is within the 52nd Avenue Neighborhood Preservation Area (NPA) which requires a finding that the development not create adverse noise, visual, air quality, health, or safety impacts on adjoining residential uses. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared under CEQA, concluding less-than-significant impacts with mitigation.
- Discussion: Commissioner Borja expressed concern that the environmental analysis did not adequately address potential increases in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and local pollution, given the net increase in truck stalls and the site’s location in a disadvantaged community (CalEPA SB 743). Staff and the environmental coordinator explained that the project is in a VMT-efficient area and does not expand building square footage, so no additional VMT analysis was warranted; air quality and greenhouse gas emissions were modeled separately and found below thresholds. Commissioner Conklin asked about light pollution and noise—staff noted no lighting is proposed at this time, and any future lights must comply with zoning code requirements; no loading/unloading is planned in the southern area.
- Applicant comments: Forrest Cheney of LBA Realty stated that the additional parking is overflow truck storage for a future tenant and that the project will improve marketability of the vacant cold storage building. He confirmed agreement with all conditions of approval.
- Public comment: None.
- Outcome: Motion to approve staff recommendation (including adequacy of CEQA analysis, adoption of MMRP, and approval of development plan review) was made by Commissioner Borja and seconded. The motion carried unanimously (Commissioners Borja, Conklin, Corona Salvagnano, and Rathel voting yes). The approval is subject to findings and conditions including a no-idling requirement.
Item 2: Use Permit, Special Development Permit, and Design Review – FirstNet/ATT Public Safety Wireless Communication Facility (6901 7th Street, Rio Linda Elverta)
- Presentation: Planner Austin Chan presented the proposal for a 75-foot monopole tower (plus 5 feet for lightning rod) with equipment enclosure, seeking a use permit, special development permit (height, setback deviations), and design review. The project is intended to enhance emergency services for first responders via AT&T’s FirstNet dedicated public safety broadband network. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared, with less-than-significant impacts after mitigation.
- Discussion: Commissioner Conklin inquired about existing code violations on the property (one open case for electrical work without a permit and a change of use). Staff confirmed the property owner is working to remedy the violations. The applicant, Mike McLaughlin (Western Fire Chiefs), clarified that most historical violations were with previous owners; the current owner is addressing the open case. Commissioner Conklin initially struggled with approving a special permit given the violations but accepted that they are being resolved. Commissioner Conklin also asked about alternative tower locations (e.g., on the defunct grain silos); applicant explained structural and engineering challenges. The tower was moved away from the northern property line per staff guidance. The design review committee found the project in substantial compliance with design guidelines. The monopole design was chosen over a stealth “mono-eucalyptus” tree to better match the industrial context.
- Public comment: None.
- Outcome: Motion to approve staff recommendation (including adequacy of CEQA, approval of use permit, special development permit, and design review) was made and seconded. The motion carried unanimously (Commissioners Borja, Conklin, Corona Salvagnano, and Rathel voting yes). Approval is subject to findings and conditions including mitigation measures for construction emissions and cultural resources.
Key Outcomes
- Item 1 (Development Plan Review for U.S. Cold Storage) approved unanimously with conditions.
- Item 2 (Use Permit / Special Development Permit / Design Review for FirstNet wireless facility) approved unanimously with conditions.
- No consent calendar items, public comments, or additional scheduling items beyond noting future meeting absences.
The meeting adjourned at 6:27 p.m.
Meeting Transcript
Good evening, everybody. We're gonna go ahead and call to order the county planning commission for May 6th, 2024. If you'll please call the roll. Yes, Commissioner Spoha. Here. Conklin. Here. Corona Salvignano. Here. Devlin and Raithel. Here. And we do have our quorum. If you all please stand with me for the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. And to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. And if you'll please make the announcements for this evening. The county fosters public engagement during the meeting and encourages public participation, civility, and use of courteous language. The commission does not condone the use of profanity, vulgar language, gestures, or other inappropriate behavior, including personal attacks or threats directed towards any meeting participant. Seating may be limited and available on a first come first served basis. To make an in-person public comment, please complete and submit a speaker request form and hand it to the clerk. And each individual will be invited to the podium to make a comment. Members of the public may feel free to send a written comment, which is distributed to commission members and filed in the record. Contact information is optional and should include the meeting date and agenda or off agenda item number to be sent as follows. Email a comment to board clerk at SatCounty.gov or mail a comment to 700H Street, suite 2450, Sacramento, California, 95814. And that brings us to our contested portion of the agenda. If you'll please call item number one. Yes, and your item number one this evening is for a development plan review. It's located at 3100 52nd Avenue at the south uh corner of the intersection of 52nd Avenue and Connector Street in the Southgate Industrial Park of the South Sacramento community. And the environmental document is the mitigated negative declaration. Okay, good evening, Commissioners. I'm David Oriero's associate planner. The planner assigned to the U.S. Cold Storage at Southgate Industrial Park Project, which is a proposal for 26 new semi-truck parking stalls, site landscaping and stormwater quality, and a stormwater quality basin accessory to an existing 145,002 square foot cold storage building. The site is located at 3100 52nd Avenue at the intersection of Connector Street and 52nd Avenue within the 52nd Avenue Neighborhood Preservation Area of the South Sacramento community. The subject parcel is currently developed once again with a 145,000 square foot cold storage building with eight truck parking stalls, 20 loading dock stalls, and 50 standard auto stalls, and two accessible auto stalls. The southern 250 feet of the parcel is currently undeveloped and is the area in which the project is proposed. Within the proposed or within the project are 12 non-native trees, the majority of which are located along the southern property line boundary. So here we have the uh zoning map showing the M1 or Light Industrial Zoning District, along with the 52nd Avenue MPA or neighborhood preservation area ordinance, which the southern 250 feet of the subject property is located within. Surrounding land uses include processing and warehousing to the north, a mobile home community within the city of Sacramento to the south, which is really um the reasoning for the 52nd Avenue uh NPA, a truck terminal to the east, and train tracks for the Western Pacific Railroad within the city of Sacramento to the west. So some site history on November 30th, 1978. A variance was granted to reduce the required front yard setback to 14 feet eight inches to construct a pup a pump house. The pump house does remain on site today. So the entitlement associated with this project is a development plan review, which is to allow for 26 new truck parking stalls pursuant to the 52nd Avenue Neighborhood Preservation Area Ordinance. A little background on the 52nd Avenue and Neighborhood Preservation Area Ordinance. It was adopted by the Board of Supervisors in December of 1978 and applies to the property within 250 feet of the industrial residential interface along the southern boundary of the properties along the south side of 52nd Avenue. It was created recognizing that the industrial and residential zoned property are juxtaposed in a manner which would not provide the necessary buffering provided by standard zoning regulations. Recognizing this juxtaposition, it prescribes specific development standards for the area, including a 75 foot landscape area between the industrial and residential interface planted with trees space 30 feet on center, capable of reaching 30 feet in height at maturity, a eight-foot tall solid wall at the interface, and a maximum height of 40 feet. I would also note that the 40 foot height limit is not applicable to this project as it is only limited to flat work, including the parking, landscaping, and water quality basin. So the MPA also requires a development plan review for any development within its boundaries, with the required finding that the for approval that the development not create adverse noise, visual, air quality, health, or safety impacts on adjoining residential uses. An initial study was prepared pursuant to CEQA, which analyzed impacts to a variety of a variety of topics, including air quality, hydrology and water quality, aesthetics, noise, and hazards and hazardous materials.
openpublica.com