OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Sacramento County, California/Boards and Commissions
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Sacramento Transportation Authority Board Meeting - September 14, 2026

Boards and Commissions — Monday, September 14, 2026
BodySacramento County, California
SessionBoards and Commissions
DateMonday, September 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 50:26

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:01

And call to order the Sacramento Transportation Authority for September 10th.

0:05

Will you please call the roll?

0:07

Yes, Chair.

0:08

Director Bulhan.

0:09

I'm here.

0:10

Director Desmond.

0:12

Guerra Dickinson.

0:15

Hume.

0:15

Here.

0:16

Kennedy.

0:17

Here.

0:18

Pluckybom.

0:20

Middleton.

0:21

Here.

0:22

Pull the potty.

0:23

Here.

0:24

Rodriguez.

0:25

Here.

0:26

Avdis.

0:28

Seeing Alan?

0:30

Here.

0:30

Speace.

0:31

Present Telamontis.

0:34

Vane.

0:36

And Chair Rethel.

0:37

Here.

0:38

And with those members present, we do have a quorum.

0:40

Thank you.

0:41

If you'll please stand with me for the Pledge of Allegiance.

0:47

Pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.

0:54

Foundation.

0:56

Invisible.

1:02

And will you please read the announcements?

1:05

Yes, Chair.

1:07

This meeting of the Sacramental Transportation Authority is live and recorded with closed captioning.

1:12

It is cable cast on Metro Cable 14, the local the local government affairs channel on Comcast and Direct TV Uverse Cable Systems.

1:19

It is also live streamed at MetroLive 14 Live.sackCounty.gov.

1:24

Today's meeting replays Friday, September 18th at 2 p.m.

1:28

on Metro Cable Channel 14.

1:30

Once posted, the recording of this meeting can be viewed on demand at YouTube.com forward slash Metro Cable 14.

1:37

To make an in-person public comment, please complete a speaker request form and hand it to the clerk.

1:42

The chairperson will call your name when it's your turn to make a comment.

1:45

You may also send written comments by email to board clerk at SACCounty.gov.

1:50

Your comment will be routed to the board and filed in the record.

1:56

All right, that takes us to comments from the public that are not on the agenda.

2:00

Do we have any comments this afternoon?

2:02

We do, Chair.

2:03

We have one public comment.

2:08

And then Chair of if the record can reflect that I made it on time for the clerk.

2:13

Thank you so much for coming with this.

2:14

I mean on time is relative.

2:20

Floor is there.

2:21

Good afternoon, Mr.

2:22

Chair, Vice Chair, Committee members.

2:24

My name is Joshua Arce, and I'm the executive director of the California Alliance for Jobs.

2:29

I came by to say hi, to thank you, and to introduce or reintroduce our coalition to you.

2:35

We are a labor and business coalition.

2:38

We are two of the biggest construction unions in Northern California, the Northern California Labors and Operating Engineers, local three collectively representing 70,000 working women and men, and then in the business side of our coalition, the associated general contractors and united contractors who together represent 2,000 construction industry employers.

2:59

We're based right here in San Francisco.

3:01

We're helping build the state's infrastructure from Fresno all the way north to the Oregon border.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Transportation Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Public Transit██████████████████████████29%
Public Comment██████████████15%
Procedural█████6%
Summary of Proceedings

Sacramento Transportation Authority Board Meeting - September 14, 2026

(The transcript references a meeting date of September 10, 2026; the provided date for this summary is September 14, 2026.)

The Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA) board met to consider several transportation funding and planning items, including a feasibility study for the Green Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), an SB1 grant application for the Grant Line Road Safety Improvement Project, and the introduction of an annual awards program. Board members also received reports on regional prioritization and subcommittee activities. All votes were unanimous.

Consent Calendar

  • The consent items were approved by unanimous vote with no public comments or requests to pull items.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Joshua Arce, Executive Director of the California Alliance for Jobs (a labor and business coalition representing 70,000 workers and 2,000 employers), introduced his organization and expressed general support for the STA's work. He later commented on two agenda items:
    • On the Green Line BRT/Light Rail study, he reported that a June 2026 poll of Sacramento city residents found nearly 70% favorable opinion of light rail to the airport, with only 18% unfavorable. He urged keeping light rail as an option while advancing BRT.
    • On the Grant Line Road project, he shared poll results showing 82% support among county residents outside the city, with only 8% opposed. He further stated that two-thirds of respondents would support a revenue measure to help fund the Southeast Connector.

Discussion Items

  • Item 5: Green Line Bus Rapid Transit Feasibility Study – Kevin Schroeder (Senior Planner, SAC RT) presented a study funded by $200,000 from STA and $500,000 from a Caltrans grant. The Green Line (also called the DNA line) is an 11.2-mile planned light-rail corridor from downtown Sacramento to the airport, with 14 stations and 7.5 miles of dedicated right-of-way (irrevocable offers of dedication, IODs). Many IODs expire in 2029. The study will examine implementing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) as an incremental step that does not preclude future light rail. Four initial BRT packages cost about $300 million; more expensive packages (5-7) could achieve 80-96% rollover to eventual light rail. The SAC RT board is expected to consider a locally preferred alternative in 2027.

    • Board discussion: Director Talamantes expressed strong support for light rail but welcomed BRT as an interim step to protect IODs and improve transit. Director Kennedy favored BRT as more cost-effective and flexible, noting light rail is a 150-year-old technology. Director C. Allen (also SAC RT chair) emphasized a balanced approach given funding constraints. Director Busey noted the connection to the SAC 5 managed lanes project, which would improve BRT travel time reliability.
    • Vote: Unanimous approval to authorize the executive director to execute the allocation and expenditure contract.
  • Item 6: SB1 Cycle 5 Local Partnership Program – Grant Line Road Safety Improvement Project – Derek Minima (Capitol Southeast Connector JPA) presented a request for $25 million in state competitive grant funds for a complete reconstruction of Grant Line Road (a two-lane farm road on the eastern edge of the county, serving Rancho Cordova and unincorporated areas). The project includes a center median, shoulders, lighting, a Class I bike trail, and will address head-on collisions and run-off-road crashes. The project already has a $25 million federal grant (RAISE), which will serve as the required 1:1 match. Design is at 90%, right-of-way acquisition is active, and construction could begin in 2027 if awarded. Measure A has allocated $4.9 million plus additional mitigation funds for this project.

    • Board discussion: Director Pulapati shared a personal story of a severe accident on Grant Line Road and stressed safety. Directors Single, Rodriguez, and Hume all voiced strong support, noting the project’s regional importance and safety benefits. Director Busey added that the project aligns with Measure A guiding principles of leveraging outside funds.
    • Vote: Unanimous approval to nominate the project for the SB1 grant.
  • Item 7: Introduction of Annual Awards Program – STA staff proposed a “Measure A Transportation Awards Program” with five categories: Measure A Leveraging Award, Partnership Award, Transportation Leadership Award (elected officials), Transportation Championship Award (staff), and Community Recognition Award. The Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) would recommend winners; current STA board members are ineligible. The timeline calls for nominations in late September, ITOC review in October, and awards in November alongside the annual audit. Board members expressed general support, and staff took silence as concurrence.

  • Item 8: Executive Director’s Report – Director Busey reported:

    • Four community listening sessions on transportation priorities were completed in June–August 2026; results will come to the board.
    • SACOG’s SB1 regional project prioritization effort ranked STA’s US 50 Multimodal Corridor Connections project as the #1 priority for the Solutions for Congested Corridors program, and the Placer Sacramento Gateway project as #2. For the Trade Corridor Enhancement Program, STA’s project was also #1.
    • Two federal grant applications were submitted: one for the Harvest Quarter Improvement Partnership (Twin Cities Road) and one for the Stockton Boulevard Safety and Transit Enhancement Project (Stockton BRT). Decisions expected November–December 2026.
    • STA will be a co‑applicant (with no financial contribution) on a Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant with SACOG to advance vehicle miles traveled (VMT) mitigation strategy and potentially fund transit and active transportation.
  • Item 9: Comments and Reports from Authority Members –

    • CARTA report: Director Talamantes noted that the Yolo 80 managed lanes are expected to open in late 2026 with a free introductory period.
    • Transportation Funding Subcommittee: The chair invited new members to express interest; existing members include Yara, Gera, Dickinson, Cerna, Desmond, and possibly others.
    • STA Role in Region Subcommittee: Director Hume reported that they are taking a “wait and see” approach regarding VMT banks and regional transportation funding decisions; a September–October update meeting is planned.

Key Outcomes

  • Green Line BRT Study: Unanimously approved; contract authorized. The study will proceed, preserving IODs and considering BRT without precluding light rail.
  • SB1 Grant Nomination for Grant Line Road: Unanimously approved; project will compete statewide for $25 million.
  • Annual Awards Program: Concept approved with implementation details (categories, ITOC review, November ceremony) to proceed.
  • No action taken on closed session items; nothing to report.

(Meeting adjourned after closed session.)

Meeting Transcript

And call to order the Sacramento Transportation Authority for September 10th. Will you please call the roll? Yes, Chair. Director Bulhan. I'm here. Director Desmond. Guerra Dickinson. Hume. Here. Kennedy. Here. Pluckybom. Middleton. Here. Pull the potty. Here. Rodriguez. Here. Avdis. Seeing Alan? Here. Speace. Present Telamontis. Vane. And Chair Rethel. Here. And with those members present, we do have a quorum. Thank you. If you'll please stand with me for the Pledge of Allegiance. Pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. Foundation. Invisible. And will you please read the announcements? Yes, Chair. This meeting of the Sacramental Transportation Authority is live and recorded with closed captioning. It is cable cast on Metro Cable 14, the local the local government affairs channel on Comcast and Direct TV Uverse Cable Systems. It is also live streamed at MetroLive 14 Live.sackCounty.gov. Today's meeting replays Friday, September 18th at 2 p.m. on Metro Cable Channel 14. Once posted, the recording of this meeting can be viewed on demand at YouTube.com forward slash Metro Cable 14. To make an in-person public comment, please complete a speaker request form and hand it to the clerk. The chairperson will call your name when it's your turn to make a comment. You may also send written comments by email to board clerk at SACCounty.gov. Your comment will be routed to the board and filed in the record. All right, that takes us to comments from the public that are not on the agenda. Do we have any comments this afternoon? We do, Chair. We have one public comment. And then Chair of if the record can reflect that I made it on time for the clerk. Thank you so much for coming with this.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com