San Antonio Planning Commission Meeting - July 9, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
San Antonio Planning Commission Meeting - July 9, 2025
The San Antonio Planning Commission met on July 9, 2025 at 2:00 PM to consider a consent agenda and a contested rezoning request for a funeral home. The meeting began with a roll call and the establishment of a quorum (Commissioners Sánchez, García, Duzuki, Siegel, Profit, Peck; Commissioner López recused himself for agenda item 8). The consent agenda was approved unanimously. The main discussion focused on agenda item 11, a rezoning for a funeral home at 13,900 Melsberger. Public testimony was heard, and the commission ultimately approved the request 6-0.
Consent Calendar
- The consent agenda (comprising items where staff recommended approval without discussion) was moved by Commissioner Profit, seconded by Commissioner García, and passed unanimously (6-0, with Commissioner López recused for item 8).
Public Comments & Testimony
- A voicemail from Christopher Adams (1811 Shoal Run Street, San Antonio, 78232) was read into the record. Adams stated he was the president of the Gardens or Vocalo Homeowners Association, located near the proposed rezoning. He expressed opposition, arguing that the change from a park/open space to a commercial funeral home would reduce quality of life and property values. He requested to be included in further discussions. The voicemail was played for the commission.
- Alan Cazar (12515 Enfield Park, San Antonio) testified in opposition. He stated he and his wife learned of the proposal only that morning. He raised concerns about flooding from Elms Creek, citing FEMA flood hazard zones and personal observations of catastrophic flooding in the area, including a vehicle swept into a tree. He stressed the danger of developing in a floodplain.
- Kim Pettett (2034 Oakline? - address partially given, president of the Oakline Homeowners Association) testified in opposition. She echoed flood concerns and noted that neighboring properties (including a commercial restaurant) had no knowledge of the proposal until the announcement. She argued that heavy traffic on John Moltber and the bridge location would create safety issues. She suggested alternative sites on MacAllister or with Tommy Johnson.
- Tember Recalling (also gave address as 2034? - shared the same address as Pettett) testified not in opposition, but requested that any resolution include an access easement to their 8-acre property, which had been landlocked by the proposed development.
- The applicant, Jeremy Bernell (1914 Melán Street, San Antonio, 78205), spoke in favor. He stated he has owned the property for 15 years, has never experienced flooding, and plans only interior and exterior remodeling (no new buildings) to transform a former gentleman's club into a funeral home. He emphasized limited traffic and small services (75-125 people maximum) and noted that the industry is moving toward cremation. He stated the requested zoning is C2C2D (commercial) and the proposal does not involve large corporate expansion.
Discussion Items
- The main agenda item was a rezoning request (PA 2025 116-05-3) for a funeral home at 13,900 Melsberger, within the vicinity of the international airport. The staff planner (Alexa Retana) presented: 23 notifications were sent, with 2 opposed and no response from the homeowners' association. The area already has commercial uses to the west, and the amendment would not significantly alter traffic patterns. Staff recommended approval.
- Commissioner Duzuki questioned the applicant about the current use of the building and potential changes to parking and impervious cover. The applicant confirmed no new buildings, only beautification, and an increase of a few parking spaces. Commissioner Duzuki noted that current buildings are not in the floodplain, but that development review (e.g., drainage, impervious cover) would still be required during permitting. He also advised the opposing residents to register as a registered neighborhood association to receive future notifications.
- Commissioner Siegel confirmed all questions were answered. No other commissioners had questions. Chair Peck noted that access issues would need to be resolved through a separate subdivision process, not through this rezoning.
Key Outcomes
- Rezoning Approval (Agenda Item 11): The public hearing was closed. Commissioner Siegel moved to approve the applicant's request, seconded by Commissioner Profit. The vote was 6-0 in favor (Commissioners Siegel, Profit, Sánchez, García, Duzuki, Peck all aye; Commissioner López was recused and not present for this item). The motion passed.
- The minutes of the previous meeting were approved as part of the consent agenda.
- The director reported no additional items.
- The meeting adjourned at 2:27 PM.
Meeting Transcript
Muy bien, todos, son las dos de la tarde. Por favor, hoy, nueve de julio de dos mil veinticinco, pasamos lista. Comisionado Sánchez, presente. Comisionada García, presente. Comisionado Duzuki, presente. ¿Comisionado López? ¿Comisón Siegel? Aquí. Comisionado Profit, presente. Presidente Peck. Hay un quórum presente. Por favor, intérprete en español e inglés que pase. Buenas tardes a todos. Las personas que prefieran escuchar esta Junta en español, por favor, pasen a la cabina atrás, a mi lado derecho para que le demos el dispositivo de interpretación. Muchas gracias. Gracias. Hoy tenemos dos tipos de agenda. Una que es una combinación y los casos donde el personal está diciendo que se aprueben y no se necesita que se discuta todos los casos. Van a estar en el registro como algo consentual. Y la siguiente agenda va a ser individual, lo que tengo todo excepto el punto número 11, como una agenda combinada. Muy bien. No hay nadie que haya registrado para comentarios públicos. Y el comisionado López sale para reclusarse por el punto número ocho. Son las dos con dos de la tarde. Y también hay un correo de voz del punto de la agenda ocho. 1345. Mi teléfono 201. El caso SPA 2025-1500 49. Y estoy, nada más tengo preguntas que me gustaría que las tomaran en cuenta en cuanto a la comisión de planeación. La pregunta son en donde podrían el almacén enfrente en donde están los distritos. La pregunta 2, ¿por qué poner un almacenamiento en esta propiedad? Y la pregunta tres es que solamente es para poner un almacenamiento en caso de un desastre y da la geografía. La pregunta cinco es si las instalaciones van a ser accesibles para el público. Si hay la pregunta seis, cuál es el volumen de tráfico o se espera que entre y salga cada día. Y la pregunta siete es si el volumen del tráfico de camiones, cómo sería cada día. Y la pregunta ocho, ¿qué va a pasar con los árboles que están en la propiedad? Los que están hacia la parte de la salida. Pregunta nueve. Si han hecho un análisis de impacto ambiental de las especies que se tienen. Y la pregunta 10, si para el 2025, si van a estar accesibles para todos los contratistas. Y donde se tiene la límites de la propiedad. Y la última pregunta, si se niega, cómo se puede asegurar que para que todas las hogares que están alrededor de la propiedad. Y son todas esas preguntas para la comisión de planeación. Son todas las preguntas. Yo creo que aquí nos están el personal está respondiendo las preguntas a la persona que habló. Si no hay más preguntas de los comisionados, y yo muevo para que se apruebe la agenda de consentimiento. El comisionado Profit y el comisionado García, por favor, pasen lista. Comisionado Profit, sí. Comisionado García, sí. Comisionado Sánchez, sí. Comisionado Duzuki, sí. Comisionada Seagal, sí.
openpublica.com