San Antonio Historic Design Review Commission Meeting - January 21, 2026
San Antonio Historic Design Review Commission Meeting - January 21, 2026
The Historic Design Review Commission met on January 21, 2026, starting at 3:01 PM, to handle officer elections, approve a consent agenda, and deliberate on several development proposals. The most substantial item was the Brackenridge Park Phase 2 improvements, which prompted extensive public testimony on tree removal, parking, picnic tables, and cultural significance. The commission also considered a church gate, a commercial sign, a multifamily building, and a residential garage and window screen replacement.
Consent Calendar
- Approved minutes from the December 17, 2025 meeting.
- Approved items 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 with staff stipulations. Items 1, 3, and 5 were pulled for separate discussion.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Brackenridge Park (Item 16): Dozens of public speakers opposed the Phase 2 plan, citing the removal of heritage trees (especially two cypress trees near the pump house), loss of over 22 parking spaces and picnic tables, and the displacement of cultural traditions such as Easter celebrations, lowrider car culture, and family gatherings. Representatives of the Comanche and Apache nations stated the cypress trees are sacred and requested consultation, noting a current 30-day tribal review period. Some speakers supported the project, emphasizing ecological restoration and historical preservation. Voicemails echoed similar concerns about parking, picnic tables, and tree removal.
- 502 New Street (Item 3): Rev. Toby Works, pastor of San Jones Church, explained the need for security gates but faced questions about the ornate design competing with historic stonework.
- 1301 East Commerce (Item 5): The applicant presented alternative digital sign options (A, B, C) and explained their efforts to fit the existing building facade.
- 1255 Crockett Street (Item 17): A voicemail from the King William Neighborhood Association opposed approval until all conceptual stipulations were met.
- 525 Street (Item 18): Property owner Benjamin Anka stated that original wooden window screens were beyond repair (90% damaged) and proposed metal screens with a wood-like finish. He also requested a metal garage structure, citing similar examples in the neighborhood.
Discussion Items
- Election of Officers: The commission re-elected J. Gibbs as Chair and Jeffrey Setzer as Vice Chair by unanimous voice votes.
- Item 16: Brackenridge Park Phase 2 (3700 North Mary Street): The city and design team presented a plan to rehabilitate the northern section of the park, including ecological restoration, removal of asphalt (10% impervious reduction), addition of 88 new trees and 177 understory plants, and relocation of a historic stone kiosk. Commissioners expressed concerns about the loss of picnic tables (over 10% removed) and parking, the protection of two cypress trees (determined to be in Phase 1, not Phase 2), and the impact on cultural uses. After lengthy debate and a failed motion to approve with additions, a successful substitute motion referred the project to the Design Review Committee (DRC) with a site visit to address tree protection, picnic tables, parking, kiosk relocation, and vehicular traffic. The vote was 8-1.
- Item 3: 502 New Street (Church Gate): Commissioners discussed the gate design's complexity and its effect on historic stonework. After a motion to refer to a design committee was made but not voted on, a subsequent motion approved the project under staff stipulations with one point referred to the Design Review Committee (DRC). The motion passed unanimously.
- Item 5: 1301 East Commerce (Signage): Three digital sign options were presented. The commission approved Option B (a smaller vertical sign at 20.5' x 15') with staff stipulations, noting it was the least obtrusive. The vote was 8-1.
- Item 17: 1255 Crockett Street: A two-story multifamily residential project. Staff recommended approval with stipulations including window proportions (changed from square to rectangular) and porch columns. The applicant agreed to submit updated plans. Approved unanimously.
- Item 18: 525 Street: A request for a new metal garage and replacement of window screens with metal screens. Staff recommended denial because metal screens do not match the historic wood character. The commission denied the request, allowing the owner to appeal or submit a revised design that better mimics wood screens. The vote was 6-0 (one commissioner absent).
- Item 19 (Postponed): The last agenda item was postponed without discussion.
Key Outcomes
- Officer elections: J. Gibbs re-elected Chair; Jeffrey Setzer re-elected Vice Chair.
- Consent Calendar: 15 items approved with staff stipulations.
- Brackenridge Park (Item 16): Referred to the Design Review Committee (DRC) for a site visit and further study; no final approval granted.
- 502 New Street (Item 3): Approved with staff stipulations and one detail referred to DRC.
- 1301 East Commerce (Item 5): Approved Option B signage with staff stipulations.
- 1255 Crockett Street (Item 17): Approved with applicant commitment to meet staff stipulations.
- 525 Street (Item 18): Denied; owner may appeal or submit a revised proposal.
Meeting Transcript
Buenas tardes, ya son las tres de la tarde con un minuto y es veintiuno de enero del dos mil veintiséis. Velázquez, presente. Galway, presente. Manzuka. De barra, presente. ¿Club Cervantes? Presente. Hola, Setzer. ¿Tenemos el curso presente? Por favor, los servicios de interpretación. Buenas tardes a todos. Si hay alguien presente que necesite escuchar esta junta en español. Puede pasar a la cabina de la entrada por sus aparatos. Muchas gracias. Buenas tardes a todos. Antes de que comencemos, sí tenemos nuestra elección anual de oficiales. Entonces, la asamblea se abre para nominar a los candidatos. Me gustaría mi nominar a J. Gibbs para presidente. Le segundo. También tenemos una moción. Tenemos alguna otra nominación. Todos a favor del señor Gibbs como presidente para un año más. Digan sí. Sí. ¿Todos en contra, por favor? La moción pasa. Por favor, señor presidente, para vicepresidente. Bueno, nosotros nos gustaría ver las nominaciones para la pos el puesto de vicepresidenta. ¿Hay alguna nominación? Señor presidente. Me gustaría nominar a Jeffrey Setzer para vicepresidente. Jeffrey Fretzer para vicepresidente. Hay alguien que la secunde. ¿Hay alguna otra nominación? No escuchar a nadie. Todos a favor. Digan sí. Sí. ¿En contra? La comisión de revisión de diseño histórico. Yo soy Chairman. Yo soy el presidente presente. Es la función de esta comisión de asesorar al a los departamentos del municipio en cuanto a todas las solicitudes para permisos, propiedades en diseños históricos para puntos importantes y para mejorar todos los diseños y las demoliciones. Si se recomienda la aprobación o de la solicitud o la negación, tiene que ser que aprobarse una penalización de la dirección por un oficial administrativo. Puede seguir de acuerdo con el código de desarrollo. Si alguien aquí presente le gusta hablar a favor o en contra de algún artículo en la agenda del día de hoy, por favor, registre en la hoja de documentario público necesario registrarse si es el dueño o representante para algún proyecto en la agenda. Le van a llamar según el caso. Y los representantes del caso no le darán más de quince minutos para presentar su caso con dos minutos adicionales para responder a comentarios públicos. Los comparecientes se les van a dar dos minutos al máximo. También ellos se tienen que registrar y le pueden ceder su tiempo a la persona de alguien más que se ha registrado y tienen que estar presentes para ceder su tiempo. Después del testimonio de Público, cualquier comisionado puede llamar a cualquier compareciente para que responda cualquier otra pregunta. La procuración por la comisión no toma el lugar de ningún permiso. Los permisos se tienen que obtener para cualquier trabajo, el certificado de apropiación. Debería que tenerlo. Esto lo van a recibir a los 10 días de haber hecho su solicitud.
openpublica.com