OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Antonio Board of Adjustments Meeting - May 18, 2026

Boards & CommissionsMonday, May 18, 2026
BodySan Antonio, Texas
SessionBoards & Commissions
DateMonday, May 18, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:09:28
Transcript — Verbatim
0:07

So it is one o'clock.

0:08

I hereby call this meeting of the Board of Adjustments into session.

0:11

Can we have the Spanish interpreter come out, please?

0:22

Buenas tardes.

0:28

In espanhol, por favor, a mi derecha in donde está la cabina.

0:32

Acudan para que les podamos dar un dispositivo y continuen ustedes siguiendo la junta.

0:38

Muchas gracias.

0:39

Thank you very much.

0:40

Staff, if you could please call roll.

0:44

Commissioner Reed.

0:46

Commissioner Stevens.

0:47

Present.

0:49

Commissioner Ivanis.

0:51

Commissioner Dean.

0:52

Present.

0:53

Commissioner Cruz.

0:55

Here.

0:55

Commissioner Gomez.

0:57

Commissioner Manna.

0:58

Present.

0:59

Commissioner Bragman.

1:00

Present.

1:01

Commissioner Benavides.

1:03

Present.

1:04

Commissioner Rosina.

1:05

Present.

1:06

Commissioner Bunnyas.

1:07

Present.

1:08

Commissioner Vasquez.

1:09

Present.

1:09

Chair Orion.

1:10

And I'm present.

1:11

That makes ten.

1:12

We have a quorum.

1:13

And if everyone could please rise and join me in the pledge.

1:19

I pledge elimination to the flag of the United States of America.

1:34

Texas one state under God.

1:44

All right.

1:47

So before we proceed with today's cases, I'd like to offer a few words of explanation.

1:51

This board follows an agenda which is available online.

1:54

The cases are listed by a number with the name of the applicant and the street address.

1:57

Following the conclusion of the cases, the board will consider the minutes from the previous meeting, followed by a director's report.

2:03

Lastly, as chair, I'll make announcements such as community calendar events.

2:06

I ask that the board members submit these announcements to me as a chair, and I will read them at the appropriate time in the meeting.

2:11

We are private citizens appointed to this board by the city council.

2:15

This board is supported by members of the city staff, combined in the rules and regulations governing the city zoning codes and other codes and aspects pertaining to this area.

2:23

This is an administrative body and not a court of law.

2:26

We only examine the facts pertaining to the release of it, we do not get involved in disputes or legal claims between parties.

2:32

Specific powers have been granted to us by the Texas legislature and the San Antonio City Council.

2:36

They're clearly defined in Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 35 of the City Code, and other ordinances passed by the City Council.

2:44

We have the authority to hear and decide appeals from a decision or determination by made by an administrative official in the enforcement of Chapter 32 to hear and decide special exceptions allowed under Chapter 35 and authorized variances from the zoning regulations required in Chapter 35.

3:00

We also serve in an advisory and appellate capacity to the director of development services regarding request for variances from regulations within Chapter 28, Article 1, Section 28-5.

3:10

In addition, we have powers to hear cases and other matters authorized by the city council under Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government Code.

3:17

Every decision or recommendation to the board must be based upon findings of fact, and every finding of fact must be supported in the record of the board's proceedings.

3:25

The applicant or his representative will present the petition and they will be questioned by the members of the board.

3:30

Any opposition to the request will be presented in a like manner after everyone has heard the case will be closed and a member of the board will make a motion.

3:37

Each member will be asked to vote on the motion.

3:39

And in order for a motion to carry, requires a concurring vote of 75% of the total board members, whether present or not, which is nine votes.

3:48

The burden of proof and granting the release sought rests with the applicant.

3:56

Appeals from the decision of this board regarding appeals from administrative officials, special exceptions of variances, are made to the district or county court at law based on the record of these proceedings.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████93%
Procedural3%
Public Safety2%
Engineering And Infrastructure1%
Historic Preservation1%
Summary of Proceedings

San Antonio Board of Adjustments Meeting - May 18, 2026

The Board of Adjustments met on May 18, 2026, at 1:00 PM to hear ten cases involving variances and special exceptions. The board, consisting of ten commissioners, granted most requests after deliberation, with one continuance and one item tabled due to applicant absence. Key topics included short-term rental density, fence heights, building setbacks, lot dimensions, and neighborhood conservation district standards.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Diana Snyder (resident near 310 Del Via Alley): Expressed support for development of a vacant, trash-filled lot but voiced concerns about narrow alley access for emergency vehicles and potential fire risk.
  • April Ramirez (neighbor of 3823 South Mittman Street): Raised concerns about unpermitted construction, parking of tractor-trailers in the alley behind a meat market, and safety issues related to blocked visibility and fire risk.

Discussion Items

  • Item 1 (BOA-26-1030079) – 247 Princeton: Applicant Elvis Trevino requested a special exception to allow an additional type 2 short-term rental on a block face where density would increase from 6.6% to 13.3% (exceeding the 12.5% limit). Trevino presented support from neighbors and the Uptown Neighborhood Association president. Staff recommended denial.
  • Item 2 (BOA-26-1030055) – 539 Calumet Place: Applicant Justin Diggs requested a one-foot fence height special exception (4-foot solid front yard fence) and a five-foot driveway clear vision variance (10-foot clear vision area). Staff recommended denial for fence height but approval for clear vision. The applicant explained the fence replaced a chain-link fence and provided neighbor support.
  • Item 3 (BOA-26-1030??) – 607 Mackelvane Street: Applicant not present; the case was tabled and later continued to June 1, 2026.
  • Item 4 (BOA-26-1030249) – 214 North Sars of Mora Street: Applicant sought variances for a 5-foot rear setback (from required 30), 5-foot landscape buffer (from 15), and use of corrugated metal fence. The property had an unpermitted metal structure used as a tire shop. Staff recommended denial. The applicant amended the request to include a cap on the corrugated metal, and the motion was approved with a 40-foot length limitation for the structure.
  • Item 5 (BOA-26-1030081) – 9102 Broxton Drive: Applicant Philip Baltazar requested variances for an accessory structure encroaching into side and rear setbacks. Staff recommended denial for side setback (fire and water runoff concerns) and approval for rear setback. The board granted a continuance to June 15, 2026, to allow the applicant to consult with CPS and neighbors.
  • Item 6 (BOA-26-1030083) – 234 Myers Boulevard: Applicant Rosalinda Valdez requested a variance to allow 75% impervious cover in the front yard (from 50% maximum) due to an unpermitted concrete driveway. Staff recommended denial. The board granted a 10% variance to allow 60% impervious cover.
  • Item 7 (BOA-26-1030084) – 262 Fulton Avenue: Applicant David Vogel (architect) requested six variances from NCD2 standards, including reduced setbacks, elimination of 18-inch eave requirement, 45-foot gable length, metal siding accents, and side-yard ADU placement. Staff recommended denial. The applicant presented a redesigned plan with neighborhood association support. The board granted all variances.
  • Item 8 (BOA-26-1030085) – 310 Del Via Alley: Applicant Zach Duquevis requested variances for lot access via alley, reduced rear setback (16 feet vs. 20), reduced lot size (2,100 sq. ft. vs. 4,000), and reduced lot width (26 ft. vs. 35). Staff recommended denial due to fire access concerns (narrow alley, insufficient hose lay distance). The applicant offered to meet the 20-foot setback. The board granted all variances.
  • Item 9 (BOA-26-1030086) – 3823 South Mittman Street: Applicant requested variances for a 1-foot 6-inch side setback (from 5) and a 5-foot 3-inch rear setback (from 20). Staff recommended denial for side setback but approval for rear setback. The board amended the motion to require a 3-foot side setback and a 13-foot 3-inch rear setback (accounting for alley credit), then approved.
  • Item 10 (BOA-26-1030087) – 15919 Purple Sage Road: Applicant Victor Nohosa requested a half-story variance to allow a three-story home (max 2.5 stories) on a lot with significant elevation drop. Staff recommended approval. The board granted the variance as designed.

Key Outcomes

  • Item 1: Motion to grant the special exception passed 9-0-1 (Commissioner Dean abstained). The block face density will be 13.3%.
  • Item 2 (Fence height): Motion to grant the special exception passed 9-1 (Commissioner Dean opposed). Clear vision variance: Motion to grant passed 9-1 (Commissioner Dean opposed).
  • Item 3: Continued to June 1, 2026.
  • Item 4: Motion to grant variances (including 5-foot rear setback, 5-foot landscape buffer behind 40-foot structure, and corrugated metal fence with cap) passed 10-0.
  • Item 5: Continued to June 15, 2026.
  • Item 6: Motion to grant a 10% variance (60% impervious cover) passed 10-0.
  • Item 7: Motion to grant all six variances passed 10-0.
  • Item 8: Motion to grant all four variances passed 10-0.
  • Item 9: Motion to grant amended variances (3-foot side setback, 13-foot 3-inch rear setback) passed 10-0.
  • Item 10: Motion to grant the half-story variance passed 10-0.
  • Minutes: Approved unanimously.
  • Director's Report: Staff reported a new SharePoint system for public responses is being finalized. No update on board vacancies; two positions remain open.

Meeting Transcript

So it is one o'clock. I hereby call this meeting of the Board of Adjustments into session. Can we have the Spanish interpreter come out, please? Buenas tardes. In espanhol, por favor, a mi derecha in donde está la cabina. Acudan para que les podamos dar un dispositivo y continuen ustedes siguiendo la junta. Muchas gracias. Thank you very much. Staff, if you could please call roll. Commissioner Reed. Commissioner Stevens. Present. Commissioner Ivanis. Commissioner Dean. Present. Commissioner Cruz. Here. Commissioner Gomez. Commissioner Manna. Present. Commissioner Bragman. Present. Commissioner Benavides. Present. Commissioner Rosina. Present. Commissioner Bunnyas. Present. Commissioner Vasquez. Present. Chair Orion. And I'm present. That makes ten. We have a quorum. And if everyone could please rise and join me in the pledge. I pledge elimination to the flag of the United States of America. Texas one state under God. All right. So before we proceed with today's cases, I'd like to offer a few words of explanation. This board follows an agenda which is available online. The cases are listed by a number with the name of the applicant and the street address. Following the conclusion of the cases, the board will consider the minutes from the previous meeting, followed by a director's report. Lastly, as chair, I'll make announcements such as community calendar events. I ask that the board members submit these announcements to me as a chair, and I will read them at the appropriate time in the meeting. We are private citizens appointed to this board by the city council. This board is supported by members of the city staff, combined in the rules and regulations governing the city zoning codes and other codes and aspects pertaining to this area. This is an administrative body and not a court of law. We only examine the facts pertaining to the release of it, we do not get involved in disputes or legal claims between parties. Specific powers have been granted to us by the Texas legislature and the San Antonio City Council. They're clearly defined in Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 35 of the City Code, and other ordinances passed by the City Council.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com