San Antonio Zoning Commission Meeting Summary – May 19, 2026
San Antonio Zoning Commission Meeting Summary – May 19, 2026
The San Antonio Zoning Commission met on May 19, 2026, at 1:00 PM under Chair John Bustamante. The commission considered a consent agenda, continuance items, and individual hearing requests. Several cases involved public testimony, and multiple continuances were granted to facilitate community outreach or revised plans.
Consent Calendar
- Items 9, 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19 (as amended), 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28 were approved unanimously.
- Item 9: R5 to R5 CD for four dwelling units at 8210 McCullough Avenue. 27 notices mailed, zero in favor/opposed.
- Item 10: R6 to R6 CD for two dwelling units at 10523 Mount Baker Drive. 19 notices mailed, six in favor, zero opposed.
- Item 16: MF-18 to MF-33 (amended to MF-25) at 8210 Pine Brook Drive. 39 notices mailed, zero in favor, nine opposed.
- Item 17: I-1 to C2 at 1711 Citadel Plaza. 15 notices mailed, zero in favor/opposed.
- Item 18: C2 to R4 at 306 Ward Avenue. 37 notices mailed, one in favor, zero opposed (Riverside Neighborhood Association in favor).
- Item 19: C2 CD (theater) to C2 CD (home improvement center) near 24000 block of W Interstate 10. Staff recommended approval with conditions (8-ft fence, 15-ft buffer).
- Item 23: R6 to C2 at 7701 Wood Chase Drive. 12 notices mailed, zero in favor/opposed.
- Item 24: C1 to C2 at 3939 Medical Drive. 11 notices mailed, two in favor, zero opposed.
- Item 25: IDZ1 (3 units) to IDZ1 (NC uses) at 311 E Ashby Place. 39 notices mailed, zero in favor/opposed.
- Item 26: C2 to IDZ2 (C2 uses) at 2625 Broadway. 18 notices mailed, zero in favor/opposed (West Ford Alliance in support).
- Item 27: C1 to IDZ1 (wine boutique) at 935 S Alamo Street. 44 notices mailed, zero in favor, two opposed (concerns with parking/music).
- Item 28: C2S (bingo) to TOD-MX3 at 7142 San Pedro Avenue. 96 notices mailed, zero in favor/opposed; outside 200 ft: four in favor, 13 opposed.
- Public comment was heard on item 10 (no details provided). Motion by Commissioner Huey, second by Commissioner Inojosa; all items approved.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Item 2: No public comment.
- Item 3: No public comment.
- Item 5: No public comment.
- Item 7: No public comment (applicant absent).
- Item 11: Residents Rachel Martinez, Ruby Ramos, and Jaime Ramos spoke in opposition, citing concerns about property maintenance, crime, noise, and density.
- Item 14: No public comment.
- Item 22: Residents Janie Benavides, Adrian Moreto, and Maria Gonzalez spoke in opposition, raising concerns about traffic, noise, lighting, property values, and lack of prior outreach. The applicant’s representative stated they had tried to contact the Misty Oaks neighborhood association since February without response.
Discussion Items
- Item 2 (Stone Oak Parkway): C2 to C2S for a cultural event center (banquet hall, meeting rooms). Applicant Elisa Chan (Asian Resource Center) presented a 4.2-acre site plan with two entrances, tree preservation, and water filtration. Staff recommended approval. Commissioner Duval questioned the circulation plan and the need for the specific use authorization. The motion for approval passed unanimously.
- Item 3 (US 281/Redland): MF-33 to C2 for medical office. Applicant Ashley Fairmon noted the site was previously rezoned from C3 to multifamily (unbuilt). No public comment. Staff recommended approval. Commissioner Duval moved approval; seconded by Commissioner Kellum; passed unanimously.
- Item 5 (New Laredo Highway): Originally C3 request; amended to C2 CD with conditional use for motor vehicle sales (full service). Staff recommended denial, citing incompatibility with residential neighbors and the Kelly/South San Pueblo Community Plan (neighborhood commercial designation). Applicant Carlos Aldava presented 31 letters of support from neighbors. Commissioner Pete Rodriguez moved continuance to June 2 to allow work on a buffer and revised site plan; motion passed.
- Item 7 (Vera Cruz Street): R5 to IDZ3 for four dwelling units. Applicant absent. Chair Bustamante had met with the applicant earlier and discussed an amended site plan. Continuance to June 2 was moved and passed.
- Item 11 (Petaluma Boulevard): R4 to MF-18 for six units (three duplexes). Applicant’s representative Elizabeth Russell requested a 30-day continuance (to June 16) to meet with the neighborhood again after receiving opposition letters. Staff recommended denial with alternate R4 CD for four units. Public comment opposed. Commissioner Inojosa moved continuance to June 16; passed.
- Item 14 (Glenwood Court): R4 to R4 CD for four single-family homes. Applicant Patrick Christensen represented his client (Craig Henry, who lives next door). Staff recommended denial with alternate of three units. Community outreach (Riverside Neighborhood Association) supported the request. Commissioner Inojosa moved approval; seconded by Pete Rodriguez; passed.
- Item 22 (Heath Road): C1 to C2NA for an indoor pickleball facility. Applicant Ashley Fairmon noted C1 limits building size to 5,000 sq ft per building (15,000 aggregate); C2 would allow larger structures for the proposed 12 courts. Staff recommended denial. Public opposition centered on traffic, noise, lighting, and uncertainty about future uses under C2. Commissioner Huey moved continuance to June 16 to facilitate a community meeting with District 6 staff; seconded by Commissioner Pana; passed.
Key Outcomes
- Consent Calendar Items (9, 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28): Approved unanimously.
- Continuances to June 2, 2026: Items 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 (administrative), Item 5 (New Laredo Hwy) and Item 7 (Vera Cruz St).
- Continuances to June 16, 2026: Items 11 (Petaluma Blvd) and 22 (Heath Road).
- Approved Rezonings: Items 2 (C2 to C2S, Stone Oak Parkway) and 3 (MF-33 to C2, US 281/Redland) passed unanimously. Item 14 (R4 to R4 CD with four units, Glenwood Court) passed unanimously.
- Minutes: The May 5, 2026 zoning commission minutes were approved with one abstention (Commissioner Sipes).
- Chair’s Note: For item 4 (continued), Chair Bustamante directed that no new enforcement actions be taken in the interim to avoid inequitable treatment.
Meeting adjourned at 3:38 PM.
Meeting Transcript
All right. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. If we could please have our Spanish interpretation services statement. Good afternoon. Gracias. All right, thank you so much. My name is John Bustamante, and I am the chair of the zoning commission of the City of San Antonio, as well as the district five zoning commissioner. The time is one o'clock, and I hereby call this regularly noticed meeting of the City of San Antonio Zoning Commission in the session. I like to do roll call by allowing the zoning commissioners to introduce themselves, starting with the commissioner on my far left. Thank you, Chair. My name is Rob Sipes. I represent District 7. Good afternoon. My name is John Kelly. I represent District 8. Danny Kellum, District 1. John Witsett, District 10. Moses Juvell, District 9. Can the Wee District 6? George Inojosa, District 3. ADP Rodriguez, District 4. Mojgan Panda, Mayor's appointee. Staff, is a quorum present? Yes, the quorum is present. Alright, thank you so much. Would everyone please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance? It stands one nation under God. All right. Prior to beginning our hearing, I would like staff to review our meeting format for the benefit of those in the audience. Staff, if you would. Before I begin, please turn your phones on vibrate or turn them off. The zoning commission is an 11-member body appointed by the city council to make recommendations on zoning cases. Upon receiving a recommendation from the commission, you will have six months from the date of the commission's recommendation to forward your case to City Council. If you have any questions regarding this procedure, please contact your case manager. Staff will begin each case with a short presentation of the request. Part of the presentation includes a map that shows the area to be considered for rezoning and property within 200 feet of that subject property. Check marks will indicate those property owners in favor of the request, and an X will indicate those property owners in opposition. Following this presentation, and any questions by the commission, the applicant will present their request. For those who have signed in to speak for or against the proposed rezoning, you will be called in the order that you signed up to speak. Those in support in opposition will be allowed a maximum of three minutes per speaker, and you are not obligated to utilize the maximum time limitation. You will be informed that the three minutes are up. For those who would like to give their time to a speaker, that speaker will be allowed a maximum of two people giving their time for a total of nine minutes. Those giving up their time must be present and signed in to speak and to announce that when the speaker is going up to the podium that you are yielding your time. The applicant will then be given an opportunity for rebuttal, limited to one speaker with a three-minute time limit, along with an opportunity to address commissioner questions. Thank you, Chair. Thank you. All right. Yes, we have two items one and twenty, and they are withdrawn. Okay. Ladies and gentlemen, if you are here for items one and twenty on Wild Eagle Road and Babcock Road on the one hand, and East Houston Street on the other, those items will not be heard today.
openpublica.com