OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Historic and Design Review Commission Meeting – July 1, 2026

Boards & CommissionsWednesday, July 1, 2026
BodySan Antonio, Texas
SessionBoards & Commissions
DateWednesday, July 1, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:39:29
Transcript — Verbatim
0:01

Historic and design review commission.

0:04

Homer, could we test your microphone?

0:11

Thank you.

0:12

May I have a roll call, please?

0:15

Ma'am and Savino here.

0:17

Velasquez.

0:18

Here.

0:20

Galloway Mazuka.

0:22

Here.

0:23

Givata.

0:25

Here.

0:26

Group.

0:30

Here.

0:32

Javieso.

0:34

Here.

0:35

Holland.

0:37

Davis.

0:40

Here.

0:41

And Fetzer.

0:42

Here.

0:43

We have a quorum.

0:44

May we have translation services, please.

0:53

Good afternoon.

0:55

Buenas tardes at all presentes.

0:57

Y alguno quiere seguir la reunion in su idioma.

1:01

Pase conmigo.

1:02

A mi derecha atrás.

1:03

In la cabina.

1:04

Les damos el dispositivo para que escuchen la Junta in Espanol.

1:07

Gracias.

1:08

Thank you.

1:10

The Historic and Design Review Commission is an advisory board appointed by the City Council.

1:15

I'm acting chair Jeffrey Fetzer.

1:18

It is the function of the Commission to advise the city manager and all relevant city departments concerning all applications for permits for properties in historic districts for landmarks on city property in the river improvement overlay and for demolitions.

1:33

In considering whether to recommend approval or disapproval of an application for a certificate of appropriateness, the commission shall be guided by the city's Unified Development Code and design guidelines and standards that have been adopted by City Council.

1:47

An appeal of a decision by an administrative official can be filed in accordance with the city's unified development code.

1:55

If anyone present wishes to speak in favor or in opposition to any item on today's agenda, please sign up on the public comment sheet.

2:03

It is not necessary to sign up if you are the owner of or representative for a project on the agenda.

2:09

You will be called on as the case is called.

2:12

Case representatives will be given no more than 15 minutes to present their case with an additional two minutes to respond to public comments.

2:20

Speakers for or opposed to a case will be limited to two minutes each.

2:24

Speakers may also sign up to yield their two minutes to another speaker who has signed up.

2:29

Anyone who is yielding their time must be present at the time the speaker is called upon.

2:35

Speakers will be called upon in the order in which they are signed up.

2:39

Following public testimony, any commissioner may call upon any speaker to respond to further questions.

2:46

Approval by the commission does not take the place of any type of permit.

2:50

Permits must be obtained for all work.

2:52

Certificates of appropriateness for work approved by the commission will be emailed to you within 10 days.

2:59

No work of any type is to be started without obtaining the appropriate city permits after a certificate of appropriateness has been issued by the Office of Historic Preservation.

3:09

At this time, please silence your cell phones.

3:12

Good afternoon, everyone.

3:14

Thank you for being here.

3:15

Um I don't have any announcements other than city offices will be closed this Friday, July 3rd for observation of the July 4th holiday.

3:22

So please plan accordingly for permits and whatnot.

3:25

You can contact 311 if you need immediate assistance from city services.

3:46

Thank you for the opportunity to speak.

4:12

Specifically with photos of the overall site and setting.

4:16

When there are changes that are going to occur to a structure, understanding the elements on all sides of that building are crucial to when our architectural review committee meets to review this.

4:27

If we're requiring it for an administrative approval, we should hold them to the same standard for when it comes before you or CTAB.

4:35

And so I'm just asking for that.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████62%
Zoning and Land Use████████████████████27%
Procedural███████9%
Disability Rights2%
Summary of Proceedings

Historic and Design Review Commission Meeting – July 1, 2026

The Historic and Design Review Commission (HDRC) met on July 1, 2026, with a quorum present. Acting Chair Jeffrey Fetzer presided over the meeting, which included approval of consent agenda items, public testimony, and discussion of four individual cases. The Commission granted conceptual approvals for two projects, approved one project as presented, and approved a residential accessibility ramp after deliberation. City offices will be closed on July 3, 2026, for the July 4 holiday.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • A staff member (Casey) requested that applicants provide photographs of all sides of a building for administrative approvals, noting inconsistencies that raise concerns.
  • Bianca Maldonado, representing Montechillo Park Neighborhood Association (MPNA), spoke in support of the project at 1901 Fredericksburg Road (item #4) with an additional stipulation that the fenestration pattern on the Donaldson Avenue elevation be reevaluated to relate to the historic structure.

Consent Calendar

  • Meeting minutes from June 17, 2026, were approved unanimously.
  • Five consent agenda items were presented: 402 Carleton Court (ADA ramp), 218 Adams, 1901 Fredericksburg, and 1103 Cincinnati.
  • Commissioner Savino pulled item #2 (402 Carleton Court) for discussion.
  • Motion to approve items 1, 3, 4, and 5 with staff stipulations carried unanimously.
  • Item #2 (402 Carleton Court): The applicant requested a ramp for a 70-year-old mother who uses a walker. The ramp would be temporary/removable and placed at the front due to an unpaved gravel rear area. Discussion centered on alternative rear placement and front door blocking. The Commission approved the ramp after a vote (7 ayes).

Discussion Items

Item #6: 14 Adams Street (HDRC 2026-162) – Conceptual Approval

  • Applicant: Christian Vasquez, architect; Kyle (co-architect). Requested a certificate of appropriateness for a two-story rear addition and a two-story rear accessory structure.
  • Staff recommended conceptual approval with 11 stipulations, including reuse of historic windows, height reduction, wood columns, standing seam metal roof, and garage door design.
  • The applicant agreed to all stipulations but noted height of the addition (ridge at 25'9") and accessory structure required further exploration.
  • Commissioners raised concerns about overall height, tree preservation, landscaping, and water runoff (flat roof section). A design review committee (DRC) was recommended.
  • Motion for conceptual approval with staff stipulations and a DRC carried unanimously.

Item #7: 1037 Dawson (HDRC 2026-158) – Conceptual Approval

  • Applicant: Nicole Sostra (in person) and Caesar Sostray (virtual). Requested a certificate of appropriateness for new single-family construction on a vacant lot in the Dignity Hill Historic District.
  • Staff did not recommend approval and listed nine stipulations, including setbacks, width reduction, massing/roof form, foundation height, and landscaping.
  • The applicant provided an updated plan addressing many stipulations but maintained the proposed width due to lot size. Staff suggested potentially reducing the front setback to allow a narrower structure.
  • Discussion focused on window proportions, porch massing, and driveway width. Commissioner Velasquez expressed concern about the front door orientation but deferred to DRC.
  • Motion for conceptual approval with staff stipulations and a DRC carried unanimously.

Item #8: 7303 Old Corpus Christi Road (HDRC 2026-163) – Conceptual Approval

  • Applicant: Tyler Schlinke and Clay Schlinke (developers). Requested a certificate of appropriateness for 21 two-story multi-family structures in the River Improvement Overlay (RIO) District.
  • Staff recommended approval with 10 stipulations, including sidewalk, curb cut width (max 25 feet), landscaping, mechanical screening, primary orientation of easternmost structures toward Old Corpus Christi Road, and design variations.
  • The applicant stated many stipulations were already met or in progress but noted the curb cut was already built at 34 feet as approved by the city. Staff clarified they would work with development services on classification.
  • Commissioners discussed design variations (roof forms, siding, colors), front door orientation (side vs. front), and consistency with urban pattern. Commissioner Velasquez opposed side-entry doors for all units, arguing they undermine street safety and pattern. The applicant offered a mix of front and side entries.
  • Motion for conceptual approval with staff stipulations and a DRC carried unanimously (Commissioner Velasquez did not vote in opposition; roll call showed all ayes).

Item #9: 145 Terrain Boulevard (HDRC 2026-159) – Approval as Presented

  • Applicant: Heather Keenan (consultant) for clients Stephanie and Jacob Abrami. Requested a certificate of appropriateness to enlarge a rear window opening (two existing windows into one picture window) and replace a non-historic window on the west facade with a casement window.
  • Staff did not recommend approval, citing historic window profile guidelines. However, staff noted the windows were on a non-original rear addition and the products met material standards.
  • The applicant argued the new windows would be more historically appropriate than existing vinyl windows and are not visible from the street.
  • Discussion centered on whether opening modifications were acceptable. Some commissioners supported the upgrade given the non-historic nature of the addition.
  • Motion to approve as presented passed (6 ayes, 2 nays: Commissioners Savino and Fetzer voted nay).

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Agenda (items 1, 3, 4, 5): Approved with staff stipulations. Item #2 (402 Carleton Court ramp) approved after separate vote.
  • Item #6 (14 Adams Street): Conceptual approval with staff stipulations and a DRC scheduled for the following Tuesday.
  • Item #7 (1037 Dawson): Conceptual approval with staff stipulations and a DRC scheduled for the following Tuesday.
  • Item #8 (7303 Old Corpus Christi Road): Conceptual approval with staff stipulations and a DRC scheduled for the following Tuesday.
  • Item #9 (145 Terrain Boulevard): Approved as presented (6-2).
  • All decisions are advisory to the city manager; certificates of appropriateness will be issued within 10 days.

Meeting Transcript

Historic and design review commission. Homer, could we test your microphone? Thank you. May I have a roll call, please? Ma'am and Savino here. Velasquez. Here. Galloway Mazuka. Here. Givata. Here. Group. Here. Javieso. Here. Holland. Davis. Here. And Fetzer. Here. We have a quorum. May we have translation services, please. Good afternoon. Buenas tardes at all presentes. Y alguno quiere seguir la reunion in su idioma. Pase conmigo. A mi derecha atrás. In la cabina. Les damos el dispositivo para que escuchen la Junta in Espanol. Gracias. Thank you. The Historic and Design Review Commission is an advisory board appointed by the City Council. I'm acting chair Jeffrey Fetzer. It is the function of the Commission to advise the city manager and all relevant city departments concerning all applications for permits for properties in historic districts for landmarks on city property in the river improvement overlay and for demolitions. In considering whether to recommend approval or disapproval of an application for a certificate of appropriateness, the commission shall be guided by the city's Unified Development Code and design guidelines and standards that have been adopted by City Council. An appeal of a decision by an administrative official can be filed in accordance with the city's unified development code. If anyone present wishes to speak in favor or in opposition to any item on today's agenda, please sign up on the public comment sheet. It is not necessary to sign up if you are the owner of or representative for a project on the agenda. You will be called on as the case is called. Case representatives will be given no more than 15 minutes to present their case with an additional two minutes to respond to public comments. Speakers for or opposed to a case will be limited to two minutes each. Speakers may also sign up to yield their two minutes to another speaker who has signed up. Anyone who is yielding their time must be present at the time the speaker is called upon. Speakers will be called upon in the order in which they are signed up. Following public testimony, any commissioner may call upon any speaker to respond to further questions. Approval by the commission does not take the place of any type of permit. Permits must be obtained for all work. Certificates of appropriateness for work approved by the commission will be emailed to you within 10 days. No work of any type is to be started without obtaining the appropriate city permits after a certificate of appropriateness has been issued by the Office of Historic Preservation. At this time, please silence your cell phones.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com