OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Compliance and Technical Advisory Board Meeting – July 17, 2026

Boards & CommissionsFriday, July 17, 2026
BodySan Antonio, Texas
SessionBoards & Commissions
DateFriday, July 17, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:15:05

Transcript — Verbatim
0:01

Good morning.

0:01

I'd like to call to order the compliance and technical advisory board of the Historic and Design Review Commission meeting for Friday, July 17th, 2026.

0:12

Can I have a roll call, please?

0:15

Davis Garcia.

0:17

Here.

0:18

Bergard.

0:20

Here.

0:21

Spiller.

0:22

Here.

0:23

Fullerton.

0:29

Pollock?

0:30

Here.

0:31

Speeds?

0:32

Here.

0:33

Vasquez?

0:35

And Sepulveda.

0:39

We have a quorum.

0:41

Thank you.

0:42

Translation Services, please.

0:51

Good morning, everyone.

0:52

We want to see a those.

1:06

Thank you.

1:08

The compliance and technical advisory board is an advisory board appointed by the city council.

1:13

I'm Jason Vosquez, vice chair and acting for today.

1:17

Juanita Sibólveda is a chair.

1:19

It is a function of the board to advise the city manager in all relevant city departments concerning certain applications for permits for properties in historic districts and landmarks in considering whether to recommend approval or disapproval of an application for a certificate of appropriateness.

1:35

The board shall be guided by the city's Unified Development Code and design guidelines and standards that have been adopted by the City Council.

1:43

An appeal of a decision by an administrative official can be filed in accordance with the city's Unified Development Code.

1:50

If anyone present wishes to speak in favor or in opposition to any item on today's agenda, please sign up on the public comment sheet.

1:57

It is not necessary to sign up if you are the owner of representative for a project on the agenda.

2:04

You'll be called on as the case is called.

2:06

Case representatives will be given no more than 15 minutes to present their case with an additional two minutes to respond to public comments.

2:14

Speakers for or opposed to a case will be limited to two minutes each.

2:20

Speakers may also sign up to yield their two minutes to another speaker who has signed up.

2:25

Anyone who is yielding their time must be present at the time the speaker is called upon.

2:30

Speakers will be called upon in the order in which they are signed up.

2:33

Following public testimony, any commissioner may call upon any speaker to respond to further questions.

2:40

Approval by the board does not take the place of any type of permit.

2:44

Permits must be obtained for all work.

2:46

Certificates of appropriateness for work approved by the board will be emailed to you within 10 days.

2:53

No work of any type is to be started without obtaining the appropriate city permits after a certificate of appropriateness has been issued by the Office of Historic Preservation.

3:03

At this time, please silence your cell phone.

3:06

Any staff announcements?

3:11

There's also I have any citizens signed up for general comments this morning.

3:17

Thank you.

3:18

Can I have a motion, please, to approve the minutes from the June 26, 2026 meeting?

3:27

So moved.

3:29

I second.

3:30

Can I have a roll call, please?

3:33

Garcia.

3:36

Aye.

3:37

Bergard.

3:38

Aye.

3:39

Spiller.

3:40

Aye.

3:41

Pollock?

3:42

Aye.

3:44

Speeds?

3:47

Vasquez?

3:48

Aye.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████88%
Procedural████7%
Zoning and Land Use██3%
Public Safety1%
Transportation Safety1%
Summary of Proceedings

Compliance and Technical Advisory Board Meeting – July 17, 2026

The Compliance and Technical Advisory Board (CTAB) of the Historic and Design Review Commission met on Friday, July 17, 2026, with Vice Chair Jason Vosquez acting as chair. The board addressed seven agenda items, including window replacements, driveway modifications, and siding repairs. Public testimony was heard from the Monticello Park Neighborhood Association on several items. Key outcomes included approval of window replacement at 515 East Houston Street, postponement of the Fur Drive driveway case, denial of a new driveway at 1914 East Houston Street, and support for staff recommendations on window and siding repairs at other properties.

Discussion Items

515 East Houston Street (Consent Agenda Pulled) The applicant, John Monese of LBJR Commercial Properties, sought approval to replace existing deteriorated windows with in-kind clad windows. The board noted the windows were non-original and in poor condition. The motion to approve carried unanimously.

463 Fur Drive – Ribbon Driveway Replacement The applicant, represented by Sue Ann Pemberton and owner Antonio Petrov, proposed removing a portion of the existing ribbon driveway and replacing it with a concrete slab to address drainage and access issues. The Monticello Park Neighborhood Association, represented by Bianca Maldonado, opposed the proposal, advocating for retention of the ribbon driveway throughout the property. After multiple motions, the board voted to postpone the case to the August 21, 2026 meeting to allow further discussion between the applicant, staff, and the neighborhood.

406 Dallas Street – Window Replacement Applicant Bob Tagle requested approval to replace 11 historic wood windows with fiberglass inserts due to deterioration and noise concerns. Staff recommended repair and retention of existing windows. The board voted to support staff's recommendation, allowing case-by-case evaluation if repair proves infeasible.

1914 East Houston Street – New Driveway Owner Richard Gonzalez sought approval for a 10-foot-wide concrete driveway with curb cuts, citing lack of off-street parking options. Staff recommended denial. The board initially voted down a motion to approve the request (5-4), then approved a motion to support staff's recommendation, denying the driveway.

200 Donaldson Avenue – Siding Replacement Applicant Louis Noriega proposed installing fiber cement siding over existing asbestos tile and wood siding. After clarification that damaged asbestos tiles could be replaced in kind and wood siding repairs could be done administratively, the applicant withdrew the request.

382 Quentin Drive – Window Replacement (Violation Case) Applicant Danielle Hinkst, representing the owner, sought approval for windows already replaced without a certificate of appropriateness. The Monticello Park Neighborhood Association requested retention and restoration of historic wood windows and screens. The board voted to support staff's recommendation and additionally required restoration of the wood screens.

2123 West Magnolia Avenue – Paint Masonry and Replace Windows The applicant's representative requested approval to paint unpainted masonry and replace historic wood windows with vinyl. The neighborhood association opposed both requests. The board voted to deny the request and support staff's recommendation to repair the windows and retain the masonry unpainted.

Key Outcomes

  • 515 East Houston Street: Approved unanimously.
  • 463 Fur Drive: Postponed to August 21, 2026.
  • 406 Dallas Street: Approved with staff recommendation for repair.
  • 1914 East Houston Street: Denied; staff recommendation supported.
  • 200 Donaldson Avenue: Withdrawn by applicant.
  • 382 Quentin Drive: Approved with staff recommendation plus restoration of wood screens.
  • 2123 West Magnolia Avenue: Denied; staff recommendation supported.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning. I'd like to call to order the compliance and technical advisory board of the Historic and Design Review Commission meeting for Friday, July 17th, 2026. Can I have a roll call, please? Davis Garcia. Here. Bergard. Here. Spiller. Here. Fullerton. Pollock? Here. Speeds? Here. Vasquez? And Sepulveda. We have a quorum. Thank you. Translation Services, please. Good morning, everyone. We want to see a those. Thank you. The compliance and technical advisory board is an advisory board appointed by the city council. I'm Jason Vosquez, vice chair and acting for today. Juanita Sibólveda is a chair. It is a function of the board to advise the city manager in all relevant city departments concerning certain applications for permits for properties in historic districts and landmarks in considering whether to recommend approval or disapproval of an application for a certificate of appropriateness. The board shall be guided by the city's Unified Development Code and design guidelines and standards that have been adopted by the City Council. An appeal of a decision by an administrative official can be filed in accordance with the city's Unified Development Code. If anyone present wishes to speak in favor or in opposition to any item on today's agenda, please sign up on the public comment sheet. It is not necessary to sign up if you are the owner of representative for a project on the agenda. You'll be called on as the case is called. Case representatives will be given no more than 15 minutes to present their case with an additional two minutes to respond to public comments. Speakers for or opposed to a case will be limited to two minutes each. Speakers may also sign up to yield their two minutes to another speaker who has signed up. Anyone who is yielding their time must be present at the time the speaker is called upon. Speakers will be called upon in the order in which they are signed up. Following public testimony, any commissioner may call upon any speaker to respond to further questions. Approval by the board does not take the place of any type of permit. Permits must be obtained for all work. Certificates of appropriateness for work approved by the board will be emailed to you within 10 days. No work of any type is to be started without obtaining the appropriate city permits after a certificate of appropriateness has been issued by the Office of Historic Preservation. At this time, please silence your cell phone. Any staff announcements? There's also I have any citizens signed up for general comments this morning. Thank you. Can I have a motion, please, to approve the minutes from the June 26, 2026 meeting? So moved. I second. Can I have a roll call, please? Garcia.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com