The Audit Committee of the City of San Antonio met on September 2, 2025, at 1:01 PM. The meeting was called to order with a quorum present. The committee approved the minutes from the previous meeting, addressed the consent agenda, and discussed two major audit items: the Greater SATX audit and the Finance P Card program audit. The committee also received a briefing on the proposed 2026 annual audit plan.
All right. The time is now 101 p.m. on September 2nd, 2025, and the meeting of the audit committee is now called to order. Madam Clerk, can you call the roll? Councilmember Mesa Gonzalez. Councilmember White. Citizen Member Tino. Present. Chair Via Cron. Here. Chair, we have quorum. Thank you. First item on the agenda is approval of the minutes. Are there any corrections to the minutes? So long ago. Can I get a motion and a second to approve the minutes? I got a motion and a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. All opposed say no. Motion carries. Madam Clerk, are there any members of the public signed up to speak? We have no members of the public signed up to speak. All right, great. There are four final internal audit reports on the consent agenda agenda. Do any members wish to pull an item on consent for discussion? Yes, uh Chair, I'd like to pull item three. All right, item three. Any others? Okay, so we will approve uh motion for which the remainder of the remainder of the consent agenda, except that except item three. Do I have a motion? Motion made. I have a motion and a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. All right. So we'll start with the individual item. Item number three. Uh did you want to just ask some questions? Okay. Thank you, Chair. Uh this is the Greater SATX audit. And um I have some, I think significant concerns. Uh, you know, the first line here in the summary is that EDD's service agreement with Greater SATX is appropriately monitored. Um, but then if you read further into the audit uh into the audit, I'm not sure how that statement can really uh be made because uh it says here that our ED, our economic development department cannot sufficiently validate greater SATX performance metrics because Greater SATX does not provide sufficient support documentation for validation. And so my concern here is we are giving a significant amount of funding to Greater SATX. I believe in the mission of Greater SATX, it does a lot of good things, but we need to make sure that just like with every organization that we give money to that we are getting uh the bang for our buck, if you will. And so I don't know who's here to to perhaps answer questions on what we are going to do uh differently moving forward. And in I guess my first specific area where I guess the or that that we need to address is that it looks like one of the reasons we're saying we don't have the appropriate documentation uh chair is that these uh these businesses that Greater SATX is is is counting as wins, these these deals a lot of them are what they're they're calling non-incentive businesses, and these folks don't have I guess documentation requirements that they have to give us, and so we can't really determine you know if if our service agreement is is being um if we're getting I guess what we've bargained for. So what are we doing there?