OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Antonio Audit Committee Meeting - September 2, 2025

Council CommitteesTuesday, September 2, 2025
BodySan Antonio, Texas
SessionCouncil Committees
DateTuesday, September 2, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 33:44

Transcript — Verbatim
0:07

All right.

0:08

The time is now 101 p.m.

0:11

on September 2nd, 2025, and the meeting of the audit committee is now called to order.

0:16

Madam Clerk, can you call the roll?

0:18

Councilmember Mesa Gonzalez.

0:21

Councilmember White.

0:23

Citizen Member Tino.

0:24

Present.

0:25

Chair Via Cron.

0:27

Here.

0:27

Chair, we have quorum.

0:29

Thank you.

0:30

First item on the agenda is approval of the minutes.

0:33

Are there any corrections to the minutes?

0:36

So long ago.

0:38

Can I get a motion and a second to approve the minutes?

0:43

I got a motion and a second.

0:46

All in favor say aye.

0:48

Aye.

0:48

All opposed say no.

0:51

Motion carries.

0:53

Madam Clerk, are there any members of the public signed up to speak?

0:57

We have no members of the public signed up to speak.

1:00

All right, great.

1:01

There are four final internal audit reports on the consent agenda agenda.

1:07

Do any members wish to pull an item on consent for discussion?

1:12

Yes, uh Chair, I'd like to pull item three.

1:14

All right, item three.

1:16

Any others?

1:18

Okay, so we will approve uh motion for which the remainder of the remainder of the consent agenda, except that except item three.

1:31

Do I have a motion?

1:33

Motion made.

1:35

I have a motion and a second.

1:36

All in favor say aye.

1:38

Aye.

1:39

All right.

1:40

So we'll start with the individual item.

1:42

Item number three.

1:43

Uh did you want to just ask some questions?

1:46

Okay.

1:48

Thank you, Chair.

1:49

Uh this is the Greater SATX audit.

1:53

And um I have some, I think significant concerns.

1:59

Uh, you know, the first line here in the summary is that EDD's service agreement with Greater SATX is appropriately monitored.

2:07

Um, but then if you read further into the audit uh into the audit, I'm not sure how that statement can really uh be made because uh it says here that our ED, our economic development department cannot sufficiently validate greater SATX performance metrics because Greater SATX does not provide sufficient support documentation for validation.

2:35

And so my concern here is we are giving a significant amount of funding to Greater SATX.

2:46

I believe in the mission of Greater SATX, it does a lot of good things, but we need to make sure that just like with every organization that we give money to that we are getting uh the bang for our buck, if you will.

3:01

And so I don't know who's here to to perhaps answer questions on what we are going to do uh differently moving forward.

3:09

And in I guess my first specific area where I guess the or that that we need to address is that it looks like one of the reasons we're saying we don't have the appropriate documentation uh chair is that these uh these businesses that Greater SATX is is is counting as wins, these these deals a lot of them are what they're they're calling non-incentive businesses, and these folks don't have I guess documentation requirements that they have to give us, and so we can't really determine you know if if our service agreement is is being um if we're getting I guess what we've bargained for.

3:56

So what are we doing there?

3:58

Uh and thank you for that.

3:59

Um Brenda, is anyone from Greater SATX here today?

4:05

Um yes, uh one of their team members just walked in the door, ma'am.

4:10

Okay.

4:11

Um I am because we have a new uh board uh committee member.

4:19

I am thinking that if we had a motion to take this up next month that we we could have them that we could have you present um next month, and then that way more of the greater team, because I know they just went through a leadership change too, so I don't want to put them in a position where they can't, and then that way uh Trisha can kind of uh get some more information on this also and um get briefed by you, buddy, if you haven't uh briefed Trisha yet, if you could brief her on this issue.

4:53

Can I get a motion to move this to uh next audit committee meeting?

4:57

Yeah, motion made.

4:59

I've got a motion.

5:00

next month and then that way more of the greater team because I know they just went through a leadership change too so I don't want to put them in a position where they can't and then that way uh Trisha can kind of uh get some more information on this also and um get briefed by you buddy if you haven't uh briefed Trisha yet if you could brief her on this issue is it can I get a motion to move this to uh next audit committee meeting yeah motion made I've got a motion do I have a second all right all those in favor say aye aye aye okay so uh item the I the audit item on greater sat will be moved to the next audit committee meeting and buddy you have your directions on uh briefing with our new uh trust uh committee member and hopefully our we'll get a second community representative and they can be briefed also and then greater SATX thank you for coming in today but let your team know we we expect you to be here to answer questions next month all right now we're going on to our individual items that's item six is audit of the finance P Card program can we get a staff presentation hello oh sorry just checking for good afternoon my name is Abigail Esteves I was the audit manager for this project and I'll be presenting the results over the finance P Card program audit overall our objective was to determine if the P Card program was managed in accordance with the department's policies and procedures we determined that finance had adequate controls to provision P Card program participants.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Audit█████████████████████████████████████████████76%
Procedural█████████16%
Homelessness███5%
Procurement and Contracting██3%
Summary of Proceedings

San Antonio Audit Committee Meeting - September 2, 2025

The Audit Committee of the City of San Antonio met on September 2, 2025, at 1:01 PM. The meeting was called to order with a quorum present. The committee approved the minutes from the previous meeting, addressed the consent agenda, and discussed two major audit items: the Greater SATX audit and the Finance P Card program audit. The committee also received a briefing on the proposed 2026 annual audit plan.

Consent Calendar

  • The minutes of the previous meeting were approved unanimously.
  • Four final internal audit reports were on the consent agenda. Item 3 (Greater SATX audit) was pulled for discussion by a committee member. The remaining items were approved by voice vote.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No members of the public signed up to speak.

Discussion Items

Greater SATX Audit (Item 3)

  • A committee member expressed significant concerns about the audit's conclusion that the Economic Development Department's service agreement with Greater SATX is appropriately monitored. The audit noted that the department cannot sufficiently validate Greater SATX performance metrics because Greater SATX does not provide sufficient supporting documentation for validation. The committee member noted that many of the businesses counted as "wins" are non-incentive businesses with no documentation requirements, making it difficult to determine if the city is getting value for its funding.
  • The committee decided to move this item to the next audit committee meeting to allow Greater SATX to present, given their recent leadership change and to allow new committee members to be briefed. A motion to move the item to the next meeting passed by voice vote.

Finance P Card Program Audit (Item 6)

  • Abigail Esteves, audit manager, presented the results. The objective was to determine if the P Card program was managed in accordance with policies and procedures. The audit found that finance had adequate controls for provisioning participants and ensuring accurate payments, but identified opportunities for improvement in policies, transaction monitoring, and card controls.
  • Key findings included: an outdated user guide; 45% of sampled transactions lacked required supporting documentation; 44% of transactions in unapproved transaction reports remained unapproved for three or more months; 1,644 potentially questionable transactions; hundreds of purchases exceeding $3,000 that should have been under contract; 123 cardholders with limits significantly above actual spending; and employees who had separated from the city still had active cards for an average of 99 days (seven cards still active, though no purchases were made on them).
  • Finance agreed with the recommendations and developed corrective action plans with a tentative completion date of June 2025. Finance Director Troy and Deputy Finance Director Ben addressed the committee, explaining that many issues were transitional due to a system conversion from Wells Fargo to Chase. They stated that all 1,644 potentially unallowed transactions were reviewed and no disallowed costs were found, but acknowledged the need for better documentation and controls. A new program guide is being issued, and a strengthened process for terminating card access upon employee separation has been implemented.
  • Committee members, particularly Councilmember White, raised concerns about the adequacy of monitoring given the volume of issues. The committee discussed the need for more frequent audits of this high-risk program.

Proposed 2026 Annual Audit Plan (Item 7, Briefing)

  • Buddy Vargas, City Auditor, presented the proposed plan for the 2026 fiscal year. The plan is developed through input from management and council, a high-level risk assessment, and prioritization of audits that add value and address revenue and expenditure challenges due to the city's budget shortfall.
  • The plan includes 32 performance audits, 3 consulting projects, special project requests, follow-up work, and data analysis. Approximately 10 audits have a significant revenue component. New areas include audits related to flooding safety and the new Homeless Services Department. The plan also includes a workforce development audit (Project Quest) and a homeless services and strategies audit.
  • Two audits from the 2025 plan were postponed and rolled over: aviation parking operations and SAP upgrade. Two audits were removed: CCDO parking operations (due to pending RFP) and LGC audit (low risk).
  • The committee discussed the plan, with Councilmember Mesa Gonzalez requesting a column showing the last audit date for each department. Councilmember White thanked the team for the work, emphasizing the importance of oversight during budget deficits.

Key Outcomes

  • Greater SATX Audit (Item 3): Moved to the next audit committee meeting (date not specified) for further discussion with Greater SATX representatives. The city auditor was directed to brief the new committee members on the issue.
  • Finance P Card Program Audit (Item 6): Approved by voice vote. The committee noted the corrective actions and expressed expectation for more frequent follow-up audits.
  • Proposed 2026 Annual Audit Plan (Item 7): The committee voted to send the plan to the October 9, 2025 A Session of City Council for approval. The motion passed by voice vote. The plan will be updated with a matrix showing the last audit date for each department.
  • The meeting adjourned at 1:35 PM.

Meeting Transcript

All right. The time is now 101 p.m. on September 2nd, 2025, and the meeting of the audit committee is now called to order. Madam Clerk, can you call the roll? Councilmember Mesa Gonzalez. Councilmember White. Citizen Member Tino. Present. Chair Via Cron. Here. Chair, we have quorum. Thank you. First item on the agenda is approval of the minutes. Are there any corrections to the minutes? So long ago. Can I get a motion and a second to approve the minutes? I got a motion and a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. All opposed say no. Motion carries. Madam Clerk, are there any members of the public signed up to speak? We have no members of the public signed up to speak. All right, great. There are four final internal audit reports on the consent agenda agenda. Do any members wish to pull an item on consent for discussion? Yes, uh Chair, I'd like to pull item three. All right, item three. Any others? Okay, so we will approve uh motion for which the remainder of the remainder of the consent agenda, except that except item three. Do I have a motion? Motion made. I have a motion and a second. All in favor say aye. Aye. All right. So we'll start with the individual item. Item number three. Uh did you want to just ask some questions? Okay. Thank you, Chair. Uh this is the Greater SATX audit. And um I have some, I think significant concerns. Uh, you know, the first line here in the summary is that EDD's service agreement with Greater SATX is appropriately monitored. Um, but then if you read further into the audit uh into the audit, I'm not sure how that statement can really uh be made because uh it says here that our ED, our economic development department cannot sufficiently validate greater SATX performance metrics because Greater SATX does not provide sufficient support documentation for validation. And so my concern here is we are giving a significant amount of funding to Greater SATX. I believe in the mission of Greater SATX, it does a lot of good things, but we need to make sure that just like with every organization that we give money to that we are getting uh the bang for our buck, if you will. And so I don't know who's here to to perhaps answer questions on what we are going to do uh differently moving forward. And in I guess my first specific area where I guess the or that that we need to address is that it looks like one of the reasons we're saying we don't have the appropriate documentation uh chair is that these uh these businesses that Greater SATX is is is counting as wins, these these deals a lot of them are what they're they're calling non-incentive businesses, and these folks don't have I guess documentation requirements that they have to give us, and so we can't really determine you know if if our service agreement is is being um if we're getting I guess what we've bargained for. So what are we doing there?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com