Infrastructure Committee Meeting - March 16, 2018
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Infrastructure Committee Meeting - March 16, 2018
The Infrastructure Committee of the San Diego City Council met on March 16, 2018, to discuss non-agenda public comments, approve a consent agenda, and consider two items: a proposed amendment to streamline minor public works contracting and an update on the IAM San Diego infrastructure asset management system. The meeting was chaired by Councilmember Kirsey, with Councilmembers Alvarez and Zeff present, and Councilmember Ward absent.
Consent Calendar
- Two items on the consent agenda were approved unanimously by a 3-0 vote.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Kathleen Higgins (Government and Labor Representative for MEA) expressed alarm over recruitment and retention of city engineers, citing that senior civil engineers are paid 40.9% below market average and rank 24th out of 24 comparable agencies. She warned that the city is losing talent to the county and private sector, which could delay capital improvement projects and increase reliance on expensive consultants. She noted that the current ratio of in-house to consultant work is about 50/50, whereas 70/30 is preferable.
- Martha Welch spoke about poor road conditions in the city, particularly on Broadway, Turquoise Street, and other areas, and criticized the lack of in-house workers to make repairs.
Discussion Items
- Item 3: Report from Public Works on Changes to Municode Section 22 (Minor Public Works Projects) – Director James Nagelvert and Deputy Director Al Shaney presented a proposal to streamline minor public works contracts under $250,000 by allowing the use of price quotes from certified emerging and small local business enterprises (SLBE/ELB) instead of the full competitive bidding process required for larger projects. The change is intended to reduce the four-month timeline for such repairs. Councilmember Zeff expressed strong support, and Councilmember Alvarez asked about the number of quotes required (three for $100,000–$250,000, five for $100,000–$250,000) and requested data on current SLBE awardees. The committee unanimously approved the staff recommendation (3-0).
- Item 4: Informational Update on IAM San Diego (Infrastructure Asset Management System) – Program Manager Aaron Noel and Project Manager Anne Bowie presented an update on the citywide asset management system, which replaces 28 outdated systems with a single integrated platform. They highlighted key features: automated work management, mobile map-based capabilities, asset management planning, and analytics. The system went live with Release 1 in December 2017 (170 users in IT Wireless and Public Works Facilities) and Release 2 on March 12, 2018 (1,600 users in Public Utilities, Transportation, and Stormwater). Release 3 is scheduled for April 16, 2018, adding asset management planning for 50 users. Phase 2 will roll out to six additional departments (IT Operations, Fire, Library, Police, Environmental Services, and Parks & Rec) between 2019 and 2023. A demonstration showed how work requests (e.g., a streetlight out) can be initiated on a GIS map, grouped into work orders, and dispatched efficiently. Public commenter Renee Smith raised concerns about the timeline for Parks & Rec, noting that facility condition assessments (FCAs) would be outdated by 2023. The committee accepted the information.
Key Outcomes
- Approved the amendment to Municode section 22 for minor public works contracts (motion by Councilmember Zeff, seconded by Councilmember Alvarez; vote 3-0).
- Received the IAM San Diego update and demonstration; staff will continue to provide updates as the rollout progresses.
- The next Infrastructure Committee meeting is scheduled for April 25, 2018.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon, everybody. Thank you for joining us for today's meeting of the infrastructure committee. Today is uh March 15th, 2018, odds of March, and today is the true start of March madness for everybody following. I think our Aztecs are getting ready to play here in a couple hours, so our goal is to be done before then. Let the record reflect that we have Councilmembers Alvarez and Zaff here today, Councilmember Ward will not be joining us. We also have our city attorney representative, Tina Ray, our IBA representative Jillian Cassie, our mayoral representative empty chair, and our infrastructure committee consultant for the last time, Lee Friedman. Unfortunately, we are losing Lee. However, he will be moving four chairs down. He will be in his new role starting when Monday? Starting Monday as uh infrastructure policy manager uh for Mayor Faulkner. So I just want to thank Lee for all of his hard work uh uh dedication since this committee's been around and since uh since he's been working in my office since the beginning. So uh we appreciate all that and and his dedication to uh to infrastructure and all his hard work, and of course he'll still be here helping us out in uh a different capacity. So uh with that said, uh, I'd like to thank everybody who's here in person or watching on City TV. We'll start as always with non-agenda public comment. And I believe we have three members of the public who would like to speak. We will start with Kathleen Higgins, who has time suited to her uh by Michael Zucett for a total of four minutes. Great, good afternoon. I think this is the first time that I've spoken to this committee, but I watch I watch from home on the TV there. Uh Kathleen Higgins, I am the governmental and labor representative for MEA. And I wanted to come down and speak on a very serious matter, sound an alarm for you all. I happen to have watched the meeting a couple of weeks ago, the very animated meeting about the discussion of cost overruns or the cost of CIP projects, and you wonder what the heck am I doing down here? Well, one of my jobs at MEA is to monitor what contracts, what work is being performed by consultants as is as it relates to city employees. So this morning we had a very uh good meeting. Today we have what is called an Article 73, and what that does is MEA trying to be the good partner we are. We basically are allowing the city at this point in time to contract out city work in public works to consultants so that your CIP projects can get done. We're doing that in good faith that one day things will turn around, but right now we've got a booming economy and we have a problem, and here's the problem. We have our engineering series classifications, as well as our land surveyor series. If you were to look at the vacancies and the problems with the recruitment and retention with these types of classifications, we are a feeding ground right now for both the public and the private sector. They are coming over and they're taking our best and brightest. And right now, we're wanting to sound that alarm because something will be discussed, I believe, in closed session next week related to SSAs that MEA is moving forward, specific to recruitment and retention. But one example of a senior civil engineer right now, when the city did their own salary survey a few years ago, um the senior civil classification came in 40.9% below average in in their salary, which means our senior civil engineers are 24th out of 24th as compared to other agencies and cities. They are very low paid positions right now, and so it only makes sense when the economy is booming that they'll leave and take take their job with them with that with that job that comes that expertise. So I want to make it very clear that MEA, that is my role to come down and tell you before it gets too bad. When you talk about going from $500 million of project works this year, and now you're talking about going to 1.1 million dollars, billion dollars, pardon me, in projects. They want to get it done for the citizens, but you have to understand if you don't have that expertise in-house, then you're going to see delays in these projects. And right now I try to I I try to work with a ratio of 70, 30, 70 percent in-house staff, because quite frankly, city employees right now are a lot cheaper than consultants. So you want to use your in-house staff. So a 70-30 is kind of the norm. Nagelboard or anybody else right now the numbers I have is about 5050. So you're paying a whole bunch more for consultants. And you say well yeah Kathleen that's why you're here for the union. No, we want you to be alarmed about your recruitment and retention in these specialized classifications. And I want to just put for the record here to prove I've got resignation forms this past year from some of our best and brightest and for the record I'd like to submit these and if you'd like to look at them and see why they're leaving they're leaving they're demoting to go to the county and getting a $30,000 pay raise. I know you can't pay that I know you can't do that. But you have such great employees and we we want to stop this trend that we are experiencing right now. We want to build all those beautiful libraries and parks but again I'm sounding an alarm to you that you've got a real significant problem. Thank you. Thank you Ms. Higgins I certainly appreciate those uh remarks and and share those concerns and appreciate your uh your advocacy and look forward to having a meaningful discussion about that topic uh on a future agenda next up is Martha Welch come forward you have two minutes I I see these roads all the time poor condition and I don't think it's fixed that Broadway is really up it's torn up and leaving and tenth all to all kind and I see it everywhere I go in the city. Turquo has one but um Lord he said we get we we be fixed.
openpublica.com