Community and Neighborhood Services Committee Meeting, June 24, 2026
Community and Neighborhood Services Committee Meeting, June 24, 2026
The Community and Neighborhood Services Committee convened on June 24, 2026, at 10:00 AM (Pacific). The meeting was chaired by Councilmember Jennifer Campbell. Present were Councilmember Raul Campillo, staff from the Office of the Independent Budget Analyst, City Attorney, and Mayor's office. The committee heard two items: an informational presentation on the Retired Senior Volunteer Patrol (RSVP) program and a discussion item authorizing the application for up to $4 million in Proposition 4 grant funds for the Bear Park development phase two project. Non-agenda public comment was also heard.
Consent Calendar
- The consent agenda consisted of approval of the committee minutes from May 20, 2026. The minutes were approved unanimously by voice vote on a motion by Councilmember Campillo, seconded by Councilmember Henry Foster.
Public Comments & Testimony
Non-Agenda Public Comment (Rule 2.7):
- A speaker identified as Madison expressed opposition to expanding marijuana retail, citing increased youth exposure and health risks.
- Joy Asanyata (phone ending 870) shared concerns about troubled youth and the education system, referencing a recent suicide.
- Blair Beekman commended Council President Von Wilpert for gun control efforts and discussed the strong mayor issue.
- Tony (final speaker) supported campaign contribution reform discussions and expressed concerns about the strong mayor proposal, urging caution.
Consent Agenda Public Comment:
- Blair Beekman requested more open discussion about biometric technology in rec centers and senior centers.
- Joy Asanyata commended the committee for capturing public comments well in the previous minutes.
- Judy Strang noted coordination between the city and county Board of Supervisors on health and human services.
Item 3 – RSVP Program:
- Catherine Douglas expressed strong support for the RSVP program as a force multiplier, encouraging neighborhood watches to use home check services.
- Joy Asanyata (phone ending 870) praised the program and suggested exploring grant funding for fixed-income seniors to participate.
- Blair Beekman asked whether volunteers carry guns (they do not) and inquired about background checks and police communication.
- Tony questioned the extent of policing and surveillance in the city.
Item 2 – Bear Park Grant:
- Phone ending 870 (Joy Asanyata) supported the project and asked about ensuring at least 4% of Prop 4 funds go to disadvantaged communities.
- Blair Beekman referenced the city of Davis's model for surveillance technology accountability and suggested applying similar principles to park tech.
Discussion Items
Item 3 – Retired Senior Volunteer Patrol (RSVP) Program (Information Item):
- Lieutenant Travis Easter from the San Diego Police Department's Community and Youth Services Division presented the RSVP program. Volunteers aged 50+, retired or semi-retired, serve as eyes and ears for the police without carrying weapons or performing enforcement (except limited parking tickets for red zone, disabled parking, and registration). They patrol neighborhoods, perform home checks for vacationers (YANA visits), assist with traffic control, get-it-done app requests, and support detectives. Volunteers undergo a two-week academy and background check. The program is recruiting; contact 619-446-1016. Committee members Campbell and Campillo expressed strong support, noting the program's value as a community partnership.
Item 2 – Authorization to Apply for Bear Park Grant (Discussion Item/Resolution):
- Venus Molina and Manny Reyes (Councilmember Campbell's office) presented the request to authorize application for up to $4 million in San Diego River Conservancy Proposition 4 grant funds for Bear Park development phase two (total cost $18 million). The project includes a dog park, comfort station, athletic fields, and more. Phase one ($22.9 million) is under construction. The city has been invited to apply; a council resolution is required. Sergio Alcalde (IBA) noted that the grant may cover unbudgeted costs or offset existing allocations. The motion to accept staff's recommendation passed unanimously.
Key Outcomes
- Consent agenda minutes approved unanimously.
- Item 3 (RSVP) received as information; no vote taken.
- Item 2 (Bear Park grant authorization) passed unanimously by voice vote, with direction to send the resolution to the full City Council.
Meeting Transcript
Welcome, good afternoon. Welcome to the community and neighborhood services committee meeting of June 24th, 2026. Our committee liaison, Natalie Kessler, will provide information and instruction for the public to participate in today's meeting. Natalie. Thank you, Chair. While members of the public are able to attend the meetings in person, this being this meeting is being televised and live streamed on the city's website, and council administration will continue to make arrangements for the public to comment using the Zoom webinar platform. Members of the public who wish to provide virtual testimony must enter the virtual queue by raising their hand before the virtual queue closes. The queue will close when the last virtual speaker finishes speaking or five minutes after in-person testimony ends, whichever occurs first. This will allow for better meeting management between the two platforms and ensure the committee is able to manage and conduct city business. We appreciate the public's cooperation. Chair? Thank you. I will now call the community and neighborhood services committee meeting of June 24, 2026 to order. And I will now call the role. Councilmember Campillo. And I am here also, Jennifer Campbell, Chair of the Committee. Also present today with us is Sergio Alcade from the Office of the Independent Budget Analyst. Deputy City Attorney Jane Boardman with the Office of the City Attorney. Senior Policy Advisor Chris Ackerman of Vila with the Office of Mayor Gloria, and Lazelle Gloria, our committee consultant, and Natalie Kessler, our committee liaison. And Natalie, please continue with the public comment instructions. I will now go over how the public can offer their public testimony during today's meeting. If you're in person, please complete a speaker slip located at the entrance of the committee room and place it in the tray indicated at the front of the room. Please submit your speaker slip in a timely manner to ensure proper meeting management. In person testimony will conclude before virtual testimony begins. Members of the public can join the webinar by computer, tablet, or smartphone by access accessing the link listed online in the preamble language of the agenda on the city's webpage. To join the Zoom webinar by phone, please dial 16692545252 when prompted, input webinar ID 160429 1678 pound. This information is also available on the agenda and will appear on the screen during the public comment period for each agenda item. Please note that if you're watching via City TV Channel 24 or online, there may be a delay. So please participate via the audio on your phone and mute your TV or computer when it is your turn to speak. If you need to speak on a particular item, wait for that item to be called and then raise your hand to speak by tapping the raise your hand icon, or if you're a call participant, press star nine on your phone. If you raise your hand during a non-comment period, your hand will be lowered. Chair. Thank you. A quorum is now present, and we will be hearing items a little bit out of order today. After the consent agenda, we will hear item three, which is an information item, and then we will hear item two, a discussion item. So the order of items today is one three and two, and we will now take up non-agenda public comment. The council members respect and appreciate the public's input and are fully committed to protecting every participant's free speech rights at council and committee meetings. Natalie, please proceed with non-agenda public comment. For rule 2.7, non agenda public comment is an opportunity for members of the public to comment on items that are not on the agenda, but within the subject matter jurisdiction of the committee. Each speaker will have two minutes, and we have not received any speaker slips from any individuals in the committee room, but we do have four hands raised in the virtual queue for non-agenda public comment, and I've started the five-minute timer. We will begin with Madison. Please unmute and provide your comments. Expanding marijuana retail moves us in the opposite direction. More retail locations means greater visibility, greater normalization, and greater exposure for children and teens who live, learn, and play in these neighborhoods. Research consistently shows that young people's perception of risk declines as marijuana becomes more visible and normalized in their community. At the same time, today's marijuana products contain much higher levels of THC than in previous decades, and are associated with increased risks of cannabis use disorder, mental health problems, psychosis, and cognitive impacts on developing brains. As parents, we work hard to teach our children healthy behaviors. We should not be making it easier for them to view marijuana as just another everyday consumer product. Neighborhoods should be centered around families, schools, parks, libraries, small businesses, and places that strengthen community connections. San Diego already has marijuana retailers operating throughout the city.
openpublica.com