San Diego Rules Committee Meeting - November 1, 2023
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
San Diego Rules Committee Meeting Summary - November 1, 2023
The Rules Committee of the San Diego City Council met on November 1, 2023, to consider an amendment to the master records schedule and receive an informational presentation from the Funds Commission. The meeting began with approval of prior committee actions and included public testimony on both agenda items as well as non-agenda topics.
Committee Actions
- Approval of Prior Committee Actions: Motion by Councilmember Lakava, seconded by Councilmember Lee, passed 3-0 (Councilmembers Montgomery Steppe and Moreno absent).
Public Comments & Testimony
- On Committee Actions: One speaker (name not given) expressed discomfort over a previous meeting's exchange between Mara and Sean, criticizing the postponement and describing the conduct as unprofessional.
- Non-Agenda Public Comment:
- Dan Schmikowski commented on San Diego politics, asserting that all politics goes through Claremont and linking Councilmember Campbell's nomination of Bill Gore to the County Democratic Central Committee's opposition.
- A speaker (original) promoted a vaccine injury support group meeting on November 2, 2023, at Superbloom Coffee and Juice in Mission Bay.
- Blair Beekman discussed the ALPR (Automated License Plate Reader) program, recommending a bare minimum of 10-50 new ALPRs for FY24, a more open public review of the ubiquitous contract, and a timeline for final approval in mid-December to address litigation concerns.
- Joyce Inata (District 3) praised Council President Elo-Rivera for initiating a conversation with a supportive services tenant at the previous council meeting, highlighting the courage of the tenant and the complexity of transitioning from homelessness.
- On Item 1 (Master Records Schedule):
- Joyce Inata supported the amendment and the proposed delay for a full audit, giving five stars and emphasizing transparency and accountability.
- A speaker (original) criticized the retention periods (e.g., 22 months for elections records), arguing that destroying records undermines transparency and that going electronic should not justify time limits.
- Dan Schmikowski criticized the Ethics Commission's credibility, citing a personal experience where he was penalized for a $15.82 campaign misappropriation while a dark money PAC of over $200,000 was not investigated.
- On Item 2 (Funds Commission):
- A speaker (original) criticized the cemetery fund for profiting from death and objected to library fund uses for events like drag queen story hour, alleging indoctrination and sexualization of children.
Discussion Items
- Item 1: Approval of Amended Master Records Schedule
- City Clerk Diana Fuentes presented the proposed amendments, including 14 new record series (e.g., Ethics Commission records, advisory committees), changes to retention periods (e.g., grievance files to close+7 years, civil service commission hearing files to close+7 years), and title clarifications. She also updated the committee on the transition to a records management software, noting the need for a full audit before implementation, which may cause a delay.
- Councilmember Lee moved approval, seconded by Councilmember Lakava. Councilmember Lee asked whether the new record series were previously held by departments; Clerk Fuentes confirmed they were.
- Vote: 3-0 in favor.
- Item 2: Funds Commission Presentation (Informational per Council Policy 000-26)
- City Treasurer Liz Curria introduced the presentation. John Peel (Vice Chair of the Funds Commission) provided an overview of the commission's oversight of seven trust funds, including the Mount Hope Cemetery Perpetuity Fund. Investment advisors Alison Bonnie (Northern Trust) and Jeff Nip (Siegel Marco Advisors) reviewed fund performance.
- Performance: The cemetery fund (66% risk control, 34% risk assets) was up 2.5% year-to-date (net 2.03%) as of Q3 2023, with a 10% one-year return (net 9.7%). The other funds (65% stocks, 35% bonds) returned 5-5.5% year-to-date and 13.5% over one year, with longer-term (10-year) returns of 5.5-6%. The quarterly distributions for several funds are 1.25% of the three-year average market value (5% annually).
- Councilmember Lakava asked about the vacant banker position on the commission, the relevance of the 40-year-old Council Policy 0-26, and whether the fund's investment policy aligns with the city's divestment from oil, gas, and coal. Treasurer Curria agreed to explore divestment and consider policy updates.
- Councilmember Lee asked about distribution models for funds without regular distributions; Treasurer Curria explained that distributions are made upon request from the beneficiary department. For the cemetery fund, income from income-producing securities is distributed monthly per Charter Section 55.
- Council President Elo-Rivera questioned the sufficiency of the Los Peñasquitos Canyon Preserve Fund; Parks and Recreation Director Andy Field indicated that rising costs (e.g., park ranger salaries) may require a supplemental budget request in the tens of thousands of dollars for FY2025.
Key Outcomes
- Approved the committee's prior actions (3-0).
- Approved the amended master records schedule (Item 1) with a 3-0 vote.
- Received the Funds Commission presentation as informational; directed further exploration of policy updates and divestment options.
- Next Rules Committee meeting scheduled for November 16, 2023, at 9:00 a.m.
Meeting Transcript
All right, good morning, everyone. Welcome to the rules committee meeting of November 1st, 2023. Our committee's manager, Ty Birch will go over information and instruction for today's meeting. Thank you very much, Council President. While members of the public are able to attend the meeting in person, this meeting is being televised and live streamed on the city's website, and council administration will continue to make arrangements for the public to comment using the Zoom webinar platform. Additionally, members of the public who wish to provide virtual testimony via callin or internet-based service option must enter the virtual speaking queue within five minutes after the conclusion of in-person public testimony or before the virtual queue is exhausted, whichever occurs first. This will allow for bare meeting management between the two platforms and ensure that the committee is able to manage and conduct safe business. We appreciate the public's cooperation. Council President. Thank you, Ty. We'll now call the rules committee meeting of November 1st, 2023 to order. Ty, if you could please call the role. Vice Chair, Council President Pro Tem Montgomery Stubb, Committee Member Lakava. Present. Also attending today's meeting is Gillian Andelina, Deputy Director of the Independent Budget Analyst Office, Deputy City Attorney Heather Ferber, and Deputy Director of Policy for Mayor Tog Gloria, Matthew Gagan. If you are in person today, please complete a speaker slip located at the entrance of chambers and place in the box indicated the speaker's left turn at the front of the room. Please do so in a timely manner to ensure proper meeting management. In-person testimony will conclude before virtual testimony begins, so members of the public can join the webinar by computer tablet or smartphone by accessing the link which is listed online in the preamble language of the agenda on the city's webpage. Members of the public who wish to provide virtual uh testimony must enter the virtual speaking queue within five minutes after the conclusion of in-person public testimony or before the virtual cue is exhausted, whichever occurs first. If you're watching VSC TV 24 online, there may be a delay, so please participate via the audio on your phone and mute your TV or computer when it's your turn to speak. If you wish to speak on a particular item, please wait for that item to be called and then raise your hand to speak by tapping the raise your hand icon, or if you're a calling participant, star nine on your cell phone or landline. If you raise your hand during a non-comment period, your hand will be lowered. Council President. Yeah, the way that you uh adjourned the meeting uh last time. Um it was a very uncomfortable exchange between uh Mara and Sean. Um so there's obviously a reason you know why there this has been going on in the conflict um you know, uh just was you know really uncomfortable to um be around in really unprofessional of you to to be engaging that way um because it seemed, you know, there was more of a personal um type of feeling that you know was going on about the item that was bringing brought forward because it does have to do with the city attorney. Um, and you know, it shouldn't have been extended because she was saying that she needed to be there in order for this to um you know go forward. So I just find it interesting that it's being postponed like this, and um, you know, there's so much conflict with that. Thank you very much for those comments. And with that, Council President, that does conclude public testimony on the committee actions. All right, thanks, Ty. Do we have a motion to approve the the actions? Uh, all right, we've got a motion from Councilmember Akaba, seconded by Councilmember Lee. Ty, please call the rule. That motion passes three to uh three zero with uh council president pro Tem Montgomery Step and Moreno absent. Thank you, Ty. All right, let's go to non-agenda public comment, please. Thank you very much. Not per rule 2.7, non-agenda public comment is an opportunity for members of the public to come out on items that are not on today's agenda, but within the subject matter jurisdiction of this committee, each speaker will have two minutes. We do not have any individuals in chambers that have submitted non-agenda public comment slips. However, we do have four individuals at this moment that have raised their hand in the virtual queue. So we'll move over to the virtual. I'll begin the five-minute timer, and we will begin our non-agenda public comment with Dan Schmikowski. Dan, you may unmute yourself. You will have two minutes. Good morning, everyone. I like your style, Mr. Birch. You have an oxygen level pushing 100 for sure. I could not do that.
openpublica.com