San Diego Rules Committee Meeting - April 22, 2026
San Diego Rules Committee Meeting - April 22, 2026
The Rules Committee met on April 22, 2026, to consider consent agenda items and two discussion items: a proposed ballot measure on large portfolio home ownership speculation tax and a resolution affirming the city's commitment to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Non-agenda public comments were also heard.
Consent Calendar
- Approved the committee minutes of March 18, 2026.
- Approved amendments to the San Diego Municipal Code regarding San Diego Unified School District Board of Education district primary elections. (Both items passed unanimously via voice vote.)
Public Comments & Testimony
- Non-agenda: Paul Krueger suggested a study process on middle management issues and criticized proposed cuts to the Neil Good Day Center. Blair Beekman echoed concerns about budget cuts and urged careful approach. Madison highlighted federal hemp policy changes. Francine Maxwell called for better communication and transparency regarding the liability fund. Judy Strang emphasized the value of prevention funding for youth services.
- On item 3: Paul Krueger warned of unintended consequences, such as portfolio owners splitting units to avoid the tax, and noted that rental housing is not inherently bad. Stephanie Ben Voodoo (Building Industry Association) thanked the sponsor for transparency, expressed support for exploring solutions, but cautioned against stymieing development and unintended consequences.
- On item 4: Serena Pelka (Climate Action Campaign), Masada Dizenhouse (San Diego 350), Lisa Ross (Sierra Club), Blair Beekman, and Andrew Meyer (San Diego Bird Alliance) all spoke in support of the resolution, emphasizing the importance of local climate action and scientific integrity.
Discussion Items
- Item 3: Large Portfolio Home Ownership Speculation Tax. Council President Pro Tem Kent Lee presented a ballot measure aimed at curbing corporate ownership of single-family homes, condos, and duplexes/triplexes/fourplexes held as rentals by owners of 10 or more units. The goal is to preserve homeownership opportunities and generate revenue. Discussion included concerns about enforcement, avoiding taxes on newly built housing, preventing rent increases, and the timing of the ballot measure. Councilmembers expressed support for further study and stakeholder engagement, with flexibility on the November 2026 ballot deadline.
- Item 4: Resolution Affirming Commitment to Limit Greenhouse Gas Emissions. On Earth Day, Council President LaCava introduced a resolution reaffirming the city's climate action plan goals in response to the Trump administration's rescission of the EPA's 2009 endangerment finding. The resolution does not create new costs or programs but reaffirms existing commitments. Speakers noted that the rescission could lead to a 10% increase in GHG emissions over 30 years.
Key Outcomes
- Consent agenda passed unanimously.
- Item 3: Motion to refer the ballot measure proposal to the City Attorney, Independent Budget Analyst, and other departments for legal analysis and further development, and to report back to the Rules Committee. Passed unanimously.
- Item 4: Resolution affirming the city's commitment to limit greenhouse gas emissions passed unanimously.
Meeting Transcript
All right, good morning. I will call the rules committee of Wednesday, April 22nd, 2026 to order and call the roll. Vice Chair, Council President Pro Tam Flee. Here. Councilmember Campion. Here. Councilmember Moreno. Present. Councilmember Elo Rivera. I understand he's going to be a little bit late. And I am present. Also attending the meeting today, Jillian Andalina with the Office of the Independent Budget Analyst, Kathy Simon with the Office of the City Attorney. Matt Yeagan with the office of the mayor of Mayor Todd Gloria. And Abby Reuters, committee consultant. Sarah, please continue with public comment instructions. Thank you, Council President. If you're in person, please complete a speaker slip located at the entrance of the committee room and place it on the top of the box indicated at the table at the front of the room. Please do so in a timely manner to ensure proper meeting management. In-person testimony will conclude before virtual testimony begins, and members of the public can also join the webinar by computer, tablet, or smartphone by accessing the link which is listed online in the preamble language of the agenda on the city's webpage. If you need to participate by telephone, you may dial 1669-2545252, inputting webinar ID 160 439-9420 pound. This information is also available on the agenda and it will appear on the screen during the public comment period for each agenda item. Please note that if you're watching via City TV 24 or online, there may be a delay, and please participate via the audio on your phone and mute your TV or computer when it is your turn to speak. If you wish to speak to a particular item, please wait for that item to be called. Then raise your hand to speak by type tapping the raise your hand icon if you're a Zoom user or by tapping star nine on your cell phone or landline. If you raise your hand during a non-comment period, your hand will be lowered. Chair. All right. Thank you, Sarah, for reviewing those instructions for the benefit of the public. The quorum is now present. We will start by taking up non-agenda public comment. The council members respect and appreciate the public's input and are fully committed to protecting every participant's free speech rights at council and committee meetings. Sarah, please proceed with non-agenda public comment. Thank you, Chair. Per Rule 2.7. Non-agenda public comment is an opportunity for members of the public to comment on items that are not on the agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of this committee, and each speaker will have two minutes. Again, if you need to participate by telephone, you may dial 1669-2545252, being sure to input webinar ID 16049-9420 pound. We've received one speaker slip here in the committee room, so we will begin in-person testimony with Paul Kruger. You will have two minutes. Thank you for your testimony. I'll begin the five-minute timer for all those in the virtual queue to indicate if they wish to provide non-agenda public comment at this time. As a reminder, each speaker will have two minutes. And we will begin with Blair Beekman. Please unmute and provide your comment at this time. All right, thank you, Blair Beekman. Thanks a lot for the words of Paul Kruger. Really nice to hear. Um, to create a study process on the middle management issues uh is a really good idea. And somewhat long term, and I think fits in nicely to what I'm trying to describe is that we don't have to be on this dead set course of uh reducing the the San Diego budget deficit in a short amount of time. I think we can take some time to do it, and if we're clear on that with each other, that allows us a little breathing room. And um to also mention, you know, he Paul mentioned that you know, why wasn't the mayor coordinating with wealthy donors for when art funding is gonna be cut?
openpublica.com