San Diego Rules Committee Meeting – June 24, 2026
San Diego Rules Committee Meeting – June 24, 2026
The Rules Committee of the San Diego City Council met on Wednesday, June 24, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. under Chair Joel Lacava (District 1). The meeting included non-agenda public comment, approval of a consent agenda, and two discussion items: a proposed "Follow the Money" ordinance (Item 6) and a ballot measure to strengthen fiscal accountability and oversight (Item 7). The committee voted unanimously to advance Item 6, but the motion on Item 7 failed on a 2-2 vote, with Chair Lacava and Councilmember Campillo voting no.
Consent Calendar
- Items 1–5 were approved unanimously by voice vote. These included: approval of April 22, 2026 committee minutes; a contract award to Pasadena Consulting Group for an electronic filing system; an information guide on community engagement efforts related to SB 707 (Brown Act changes); repeal of municipal code Section 4-2-D4 (bathhouses); and updates to Council Policy 300-04 on annual salary reviews. Public speakers raised concerns about the marginalization of community planning groups in Item 3.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Max Schmidt (homeless individual) testified about alleged auditory harassment by city employees, describing it as "city-sponsored terror." He opposed all consent items.
- Becky Rapp (Rancho Bernardo resident) raised concerns about lack of public notification when marijuana permits change ownership or branding, using the example of Urban Leaf becoming Cake House.
- Madison (mother) urged prioritizing youth health and safety in cannabis-related decisions, citing research on marketing's impact on adolescents.
- Blair Beekman discussed technology reduction (ALPR vendors) and community energy, and later supported Item 6 and praised the consent agenda's community engagement efforts.
- Francine Maxwell criticized the Human Relations Commission for disrespect to a commissioner and urged council courage in enforcing the code of conduct.
- Judy Strang supported the pot delivery registry but called for inter-city cooperation on permitting, and later emphasized the role of planning groups in marijuana permitting oversight.
- Catherine Rhodes complained that her TOT ballot measures (online travel agencies) were not getting a second reading, and later supported Item 6 while alleging lobbying by Intrinsic Communications.
- Victoria Labruzzo (CPC chair) and Kate Collin urged the committee to formally include community planning groups in engagement efforts.
- We Tran (Voices executive director) supported Item 3 but requested adequate funding for outreach, and later supported Item 6 for transparency.
- Paul Kruger criticized community engagement as "box checking" on Item 3, and supported Item 6's transparency measures but noted mailers on Measure A were already clear.
- Simone Fuller, Carmen Penaloza, Viliana (Youth Will), Tristan Beerie, Noah Yiyuk, Nicole Lilly all spoke in support of Item 6, emphasizing transparency for youth voters and mistrust in government.
- Ann Marie Hogan (ALGA) supported Item 7's protections for the city auditor's budget and removal of term limits.
- Crypto Bradley supported Item 7, citing frustration with the mayor's handling of decisions.
Discussion Items
-
Item 6 – Follow the Money Ordinance (Real-Time Disclosure and Lobbyist Contribution Ban) Presented by Rosa Lasquaga (Deputy Chief of Strategic Initiatives, Council District 9). The ordinance proposes seven changes: lowering the expenditure lobbyist reporting threshold from $5,000 to $1,000 per quarter; requiring registration of expenditure lobbyists; 24-hour reporting (instead of quarterly); disclosing true funding sources on Form EC-605; requiring top five funders on public communications; disclosure of AI-generated content; and requiring copies of communications to be filed with the city clerk. It also bans registered lobbyists from making campaign contributions to city elected officials, aligning with county and state rules. Councilmember Campillo suggested lowering the definition of organizational lobbyist from 10 contacts to one paid contact; Councilmember Elo Rivera accepted the amendment. The proposed action was to direct the city attorney to draft an ordinance.
-
Item 7 – Ballot Measure: Fiscal Accountability and Oversight (Charter Amendments) Presented by Angeli Hoyos (Chief of Policy, Council District 6). The proposal includes four components: (1) Minimum funding floors for five independent oversight offices (city auditor, ethics commission, city clerk, commission on police practices, IBA) – phasing in a percentage for auditor only; (2) Removal of term limits for the city auditor; (3) Council authority to propose mid-year budget adjustments; (4) Mandating a chief operating officer (COO) with appointment subject to council confirmation and dismissal requiring council ratification. The IBA raised concerns about fiscal impacts and flexibility. The mayor's office (Matt Yaggyagan) opposed advancing the measure without more vetting, citing structural deficits, lack of Department of Finance input, and bundling of four unrelated changes. Councilmember Campillo criticized the dual accountability of the COO as creating a management disaster. Councilmember Ilo Rivera could not support without prior engagement with recognized employee organizations (REOs). Chair Lacava noted the proposal represents a fundamental governance shift and preferred a longer runway.
Key Outcomes
- Consent Agenda (Items 1–5): Motion by Chair Lacava, seconded by Councilmember Campillo. Passed unanimously by voice vote.
- Item 6 (Follow the Money Ordinance): Motion by Councilmember Elo Rivera, seconded by Chair Lacava. Passed unanimously by voice vote. The city attorney will draft an ordinance incorporating the amendment to lower the lobbying contact threshold.
- Item 7 (Fiscal Accountability Ballot Measure): Motion by Council President Pro Tem Lee, seconded by Councilmember Moreno. The recorded vote was: Lee (yes), Moreno (yes), Campillo (no), Lacava (no). Motion failed 2-2. No further action was taken. The committee adjourned until August 26, 2026.
Meeting Transcript
All right, good morning. And welcome to the Rules Committee meeting of June twenty-fourth, twenty twenty-six. I'm Joel Cava, Council Member for District One, Chair of the Committee. Our committees liaison Sarah Jordan will go over instructions for today's meeting. Sarah, Chair Lakava. Well, members of the public are able to attend the meeting in person. This meeting is being televised and live streamed on the city's website, and council administration will continue to make arrangements for the public to comment using the Zoom webinar platform. Members of the public who wish to provide virtual testimony must enter the virtual queue by raising their hand before the virtual queue closes. The queue will close after the last virtual speaker finishes speaking, or five minutes after in-person testimony ends, whichever occurs first. This will allow for better meeting management between the two platforms and ensure the committee is able to manage and conduct city business. We appreciate the public's cooperation. Chair Lacaba. All right, thank you, Sarah. I will now call the Rules Committee meeting of Wednesday, June 24th, 2026 to order and call the role. Vice Chair, Council President Pro Tem Kent Lee, Councilmember Raoul Campillo, Council Member Vivian Moreno, and Councilmember Sean Elo Rivera. I am present. Also attending the meeting today is Jillian Andalina with the office of the independent budget analyst. Kathy Steinman with the office of the city attorney, Matt Yeah, with the office of Mayor Tag Loria, and Abby Reuters committee consultant. With that, Sarah, please continue with public comment instructions. Thank you, Chair. If you are in person, please complete a speaker slip located at the entrance of the committee room and place it on the top of the box indicated at the table at the front of the room. Please do so in a timely manner to ensure proper meeting management in-person testimony will conclude before virtual testimony begins, and members of the public can also join the webinar by computer, tablet, or smartphone by accessing the link which is listed online in the preamble language of the agenda on the city's webpage. If you need to participate by telephone, you may do so by dialing one six six nine two five four five two five two inputting webinar ID 160-439-9420 pound. This information is also available on the agenda and it will appear on the screen during the public comment period for each agenda item. Please note that if you are watching via City TV twenty-four or online, there may be delay. Please participate via the audio on your phone and mute your TV or your computer when it is your turn to speak. If you wish to speak to a particular item, please wait for that item to be called and then raise your hand to speak by tapping the raise your hand icon if you're a Zoom participant, or if you're calling participant by pressing star nine on your phone. If you raise your hand during a non-comment period, your hand will be lowered. Chair. Alright, thank you, Sarah, for reviewing those instructions. For the benefit of the public, a quorum is now present. We will now take up not agenda public comment. The council members respect and appreciate the public's input and are fully committed to protecting every participant's free speech rights at council and committee meetings. Sarah, please proceed with non-agenda public comment. Is an opportunity for members of the public to comment on items that are not on the agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of this committee, and each speaker will have two minutes as a reminder. If you need to participate by telephone, you may dial 1669-2545252, inputting webinar ID 160439-9420 pound. We've received one speaker slip here in the committee room, so we will begin with in-person testimony. Max Schmidt, please approach the lecture and you will have two minutes. Hi, I've been homeless in San Diego, Los Angeles, and a few months in Phoenix for um exactly a year and six months, and during that time I've been followed around by people who um make weird noises that will um this is um that that weird noises that torture me. For example, they will make um squishing noises or clapping noises that um will make my genitalia uh feel like it's going to ejaculate when completely not erect. I think the internet calls this um sensitizing someone to noises and then torturing them. Um they will also make noises that make my um testicles tingle as if I'm stricken completely with fear. Um, and these people follow me around um downtown San Diego everywhere I go, so I can never get any peace. I can never get um any freedom. And they also um at the risk, the reason they do this type of torture is because it's makes you sound mentally ill when you talk about it. So at the risk of sounding mentally ill, the people who follow me around for the past year and a half torturing me, even in the homeless shelter. Uh um, I'm not gonna at the risk of sounding mentally ill, they also speak random bizarre um gibberish that um is the equivalent to being forced to wear wear headphones nonstop throughout the day that um constantly say bizarre, weird gibberish, and while that's happening, make squishy and clapping noises that um torture physically torture you. And I just wanted to say that I'm being mentally and physically tortured everywhere I go, and that every human deserves um freedom. Every human deserves respect. And for this to be happening in America is disgusting.
openpublica.com