Good afternoon, everyone.

Welcome to the March 24th, 2026 regular meeting of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.

Madam Clerk, will you please call the roll?

Thank you, Mr.

President.

Supervisor Chan.

Chan present, Supervisor Chen.

Chen present, Supervisor Dorsey.

Dorsey present, Supervisor Fielder, Fielder not present, Supervisor Mahmoud.

Mahmoud present, Supervisor Mandelman.

Present.

Mandelman present, Supervisor Melgar.

Present.

Melgar present, Supervisor Sauter.

Solder present, Supervisor Cheryl.

Cheryl present, Supervisor Walton.

Walton present, and Supervisor Wong.

Wong present.

Mr.

President, you have a quorum.

Thank you, Madam Clerk.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors acknowledges that we are on the unceded ancestral homeland of the Ramitu Shaloni, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula.

As the indigenous stewards of this land and in accordance with their traditions, the Ramatushaloni have never ceded, lost, nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory.

As guests, we recognize that we benefit from living and working on their traditional homeland.

We wish to pay our respects by acknowledging the ancestors, elders, and relatives of the Ramatushalone community and by affirming their sovereign rights as First Peoples.

Colleagues, will you join me in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance?

Pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, but indivisible with liberty and justice for all behalf of this board.

They record each of our meetings each of our meetings and make the transcripts available to the public online.

Madam Clerk, do you have any communications?

Yes, Mr.

President.

The clerk's office is in receipt of a memo requesting excusal today from today's board meeting from Supervisor Jackie Fielder, number one.

And to those of you who have joined us in the public gallery, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors welcomes you to attend this meeting in person in the board's legislative chamber, room 250 on the second floor in City Hall.

And when you're not able to be here, you can catch the live stream at WWW.sfgovtv.org or watch the proceeding on SFGOVTV's Channel 26.

If you have public comment you'd like to provide in writing, you can send an email to to BOS at sfgov.org or use the postal service if you just address the envelope to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, the number one, Dr.

Carlton B.

Goodlitt Place, City Hall, Room 244, San Francisco, California 94102.

If you need to make a reasonable accommodation for a future meeting under the Americans with Disability Act, or to request language assistance, contact the clerk's office at least two business days in advance by calling 415-554-5184.

Thank you, Mr.

President.

Thank you.

Uh Madam Clerk.

Can I have a motion to excuse Supervisor Fielder, made by Chen, seconded by Dorsey?

Madam Clerk, I think we can take that without objection.

Without objection, Supervisor Fielder is excused.

And then let's go, Madam Clerk, to unfinished business.

Please call item one.

Item one, this is an ordinance to amend the police code to require that individuals who notarize or assist people in completing immigration documents.

Offer a document prepared by the city that identifies free or low-cost immigration legal services providers and consulates, and to authorize the human rights commission to provide assistance to members of the public who wish to file a complaint with a state licensing or enforcement entity against a notary or immigration consultant who allegedly violated legal requirements applicable to those activities.

Can you please call the roll?

On item one, Supervisor Mahmoud.

Mahmoud I, Supervisor Mandelman.

Aye.

Mandelman I, Supervisor Melgar.

Melgar I, Supervisor Sauter.

Saudter I, Supervisor Cheryl.

Cheryl I, Supervisor Walton.

Walton, I, Supervisor Wong.

Wong I, Supervisor Chan.

Chan I, Supervisor Chen, Chen I, and Supervisor Dorsey.

Dorsey, I.

There are 10 ayes.

Without objection, the ordinance is finally passed.

Madam Clerk, please call items two and three together.

Items two and three are two ordinances that amend the planning code and the zoning map for various properties.

Item two amends the planning code and the zoning map to establish the 2245 Post Street Special Use District.

Item 3.

This ordinance readopts the former planning code section and zoning map designations to create the mission in 9th Street Special Use District at 1270 Mission Street.

Located in the area, generally bounded by Mission Street on the South, Lasky Street on the east, assessors parcel block number 3701, lot numbers 22, 23, and 24 on the west, and assessors parcel block number 3701, lot number 66 on the north, to change the height limit on assessor's parcel block number 3701, lot numbers 20 and 21 for projects that comply with the requirements of the SUD from 120X to 200x and to affirm the CEQA determination and to make the appropriate findings for both items.

Let's take these items, same house, same call without objection, the ordinances are finally passed.

Madam Clerk, please call it number four.

Item 4 is an ordinance to amend the public works code to enhance and modify the sidewalk flower stand permit program to affirm the secret determination and to include updating and clarifying the applicable fees to amend the police code to authorize public works to impose assess and collect administrative penalties.

And I think we can take this item, same house, same call without objection, the ordinance is finally passed.

Madam Clerk, please call item number five.

Item five, this is an ordinance to order the conditional vacation of the designation of portions of Christmas Tree Point Road and the Eastern Alignment of Twin Peaks Boulevard as public right of way for roadway and sidewalk purposes, and to order the redesignation of Eastern Twin Peaks Boulevard as public right of way for recreation and park purposes to facilitate the development of the Twin Peaks Promenade Project and to affirm the CEQA determination.

Same house, same call.

Without objection, the ordinance is finally passed.

Madam Clerk, please call it number six.

Item six, this is an ordinance to amend the administrative code to modify the following five downtown activation locations.

The number one, Jesse Alley's downtown activation location, to include the northern side of Mission Street, to exclude the public street portion of Mission Street between Jesse Street East and Jesse Street West, and to make clarifying revisions.

To include Minneset between Shaw Alley and New Montgomery Street.

For the fourth item here, the second street downtown activation location to include Jesse Street between Second Street and New Montgomery Street, and five, the Yurbawena Lane downtown activation location, to include the southern side of Market Street between Yerbabuena Lane and 250 feet northeast of Yerba Buena Lane to exclude the public street portion of Market Street and to affirm the CEQA determination.

Same house, same call.

Without objection, the ordinance is finally passed.

Madam Clerk, please call item number seven.

Item seven.

Supervisor Chan.

Thank you, President Mandelman.

And I first want to thank colleagues for your support and votes to allow a continuance for this item, which then given the uh me the opportunity to ask the questions uh to our police department about the Supreme Court's ruling on um tracking devices as related to the Fourth Amendment and the incident around uh potential misuse and a lec uh misuse of flock um equipment, uh also known as the automated license plate reader, um and I have receive uh answers from the police department and I would like for them to be um presenting you the answer that we have received from based on the letter.

Colleagues, it is our collective responsibility to ensure that the city balances safety and privacy when we're deploying technology.

So when we approve these policies, um we indeed need to make sure the departments can follow through uh with the safeguards necessary to create that balance as it related to the case mentioned in the media where flock equipment was misused by our allegedly by our police department and that I uh thank the police department providing the letter uh responding to that request and answering the question.

So, with that um President Mendelman, I would like to call on the police department to walk us through.

And my apologies.

I don't think the letter provided that by the police department.

I had the uh chance to um put on um legislative uh bio, but I have just sent it to the clerk to for us to do so.

But I just would like for um the police department to walk us through the letter, provide it to my office, and so that we can have that on the record.

Welcome.

Thank you, President Mandelman, Supervisor Chan, Supervisor Chan, thanks for your questions and the opportunity to respond to them.

I'll just, as you requested, walk through the response from the police department on your questions, especially regarding the Fourth Amendment.

In 2012, the Fourth Amendment or the Supreme Court did hold that a GPS tracking device tracking device like Star Chase, which is in question here, is in fact a search, so that's not disputed.

A search generally requires a warrant unless a warrant exception applies.

One such exception that has long been recognized are exigent circumstances where there's an immediate need for officers to protect public safety or apprehend a fleeing suspect.

Accordingly, the police department's electronic location tracking device policy, which is before you today, does limit the use of these electronic location tracking devices to warrants or warrant exceptions, including exigent circumstances.

As you know, the purpose of Star Chase specifically is short-term tracking for contemporaneous apprehension, allowing officers to disengage from vehicle pursuits while maintaining the ability to locate a fleeing vehicle or suspect.

This does reduce the opportunity or chance of uh collision and injuries to either officers, suspects, or members of the public.

Since you asked about flock, the use of the department's automated license plate readers.

Courts have generally held that there's no reasonable expectation of privacy for a license plate on a public roadway, as license plates are meant to be visible to anyone.

As such, the Flock AOPR system does capture images of a vehicle and a license plate in public view.

Again, courts have an analogized the use of these systems to an officer on the street viewing a license plate and vehicle description.

With all that said, the department definitely recognizes that there are civil liberties considerations with the use of these technologies and all surveillance technologies.

So consistent with 19B, both the Flock AOPR technology as well as the electronic location tracking device policy before you today are governed by safeguards that define authorized and prohibited uses.

They restrict access to necessary users, they maintain audit logs of search queries, and they keep data secure.

The policies all go through an oversight process through the Committee on Information Technology and its subcommittee privacy surveillance advisory board.

I can't speak for these committees, but I can tell from going through these processes that they take their oversight responsibilities very seriously and they weigh the benefits to the to public safety against certain civil liberties considerations.

You mentioned an incident that was reported publicly about one member of the police department uh whock system uh in a conflict of interest.

I think it's important to recognize here that the safeguards in place for these technologies are what in fact the department used to investigate the allegation uh of misuse.

That's precisely what they're there for.

And for this matter specifically, it was fully investigated by the department's internal affairs division.

And like I mentioned, the policy issue involved was a conflict of interest.

So to summarize all of that, these technologies, Star Chase, electronic location tracking devices and AOPR are used for limited public safety purposes, subject to the Fourth Amendment or exceptions, including exigent circumstances with policy safeguards and oversight processes to ensure accountability.

Happy to answer any follow-up questions you may have.

Thank you.

Thank you, President Mandelman and colleagues, and thank you so much to the police department.

And I also appreciate the letter.

Supervisor Walton.

Thank you, President Mattelman.

I do want to thank the police department for their due diligence and for all the work that they put into this.

So I want to appreciate the request for the continuance.

I mean, even as we are having this conversation about this technology, we have other municipalities that are actually pausing the usage of this technology because they've had concerns and they have had problems, and in some cases ending their relationship due to privacy concerns, due to data concerns, due to the attacks and the effects that this could have on our immigrant populations.

So from my standpoint, it doesn't make sense to support these devices in our neighborhoods with other cities that use them currently, and they are not trusting this technology.

I think at the very least, we should put a pause on technology like this and learn some more.

Without proper safeguards, this technology be can be misused, and we know it's disproportionately going to affect people of color and erode trust between community and law enforcement.

In addition, one day, this technology might take away some of our police officer jobs, some of our jobs that are available to the police department because of this technology.

Even in cities like Virginia, even in states like Virginia and cities like Norfolk, they're revisiting whether or not to use this technology.

They found that it's tracking people on their way to work, it's tracking people on their way to school, and it's just tracking people going on with their daily business.

And from my standpoint, I think that it is a violation of people's privacy, regardless of how visible a license plate is to everyone.

People are being surveyed when they shouldn't be.

So I I truly feel that safety cannot come at the expense of our fundamental rights.

We cannot accept the trade-off when surveillance erodes, the very freedoms that all of us here are sworn to protect.

So my thoughts on pausing are not about rejecting technology outright, but it is about getting it right.

It's about ensuring we have strict guardrails and input from community moving forward.

And I think our population in San Francisco deserves to feel safe and free, but we have to be able to protect, protect folks, and also honor their private rights.

So I can't support this technology at this time.

And I I wish that we wouldn't move forward with this because of the possible impacts on certain communities.

But if this passes here, which I'm pretty sure it will today, we need to make sure that we are keeping a close eye on how the data is being stored, how it is being used, um, who it's affecting, because this is going to have some negative consequences for sure.

Thank you, President Maddalyn.

Thank you, Chair Walton.

Uh Supervisor Wong.

Colleagues, I want to speak in support of this ordinance approving SFPD surveillance technology policy for electronic location tracking devices.

This is a public safety tool that can help us reduce dangerous car chases and the very harms that come with them.

Crashes, injuries, deaths, and property damage.

The policy is explicit that one of the core purposes of this technology is to provide a vehicle pursuit mitigation option.

So officers can disengage from a high-risk chase while still maintaining location awareness and safely coordinating an apprehension.

It also has value beyond pursuits.

These devices can help SAPD locate suspects, recover stolen vehicles and stolen property, and support theft abatement operations.

That gives law enforcement a more precise and less dangerous way to respond in situations that might otherwise lead to prolonged pursuits or broader risk to the public.

At the same time, I think it is important to acknowledge the privacy and civil liberties concerns that naturally come with any surveillance technology.

That is why the guardrails here matter.

The policy limits use to define lawful scenarios, prohibits use for non-law enforcement purposes, prohibits discriminatory or harassing use, bars use related to enforcing bans on gender affirming or reproductive care, limits access to authorized personnel connected to criminal investigations, requires training, and provides for oversight and discipline if the technology is misused.

So for me, this is about balance.

We should give law enforcement tools that can help prevent dangerous pursuits and improve apprehension of serious offenders, but only with clear restrictions, accountability, and public oversight.

Based on the policy before us, I believe those safeguards are in place, and I will be supporting this item.

Thank you.

Madam Clerk, please call the roll on this item.

On item seven, Supervisor Mahmoud.

Mahmoud I, Supervisor Mandelman.

Aye.

Mandelman, I, Supervisor Melgar.

Melgar, I, Supervisor Sauter.

Sauter I, Supervisor Cheryl.

Aye.

Cheryl I, Supervisor Walton.

Walton, no, Supervisor Wong.

Wong I, Supervisor Chan.

Chen I, Supervisor Chen.

Chen I, and Supervisor Dorsey.

Dorsey, I.

There are nine ayes and one no with Supervisor Walton voting no.

The ordinance is finally passed.

Madam Clerk, let's go to new business.

Please call item number eight.

Item eight, this is an ordinance to amend the health and business and tax regulations code to revise the definition of a mobile food facility permit to add definitions for compact mobile food operations, mobile support unit, and permitted auxiliary conveyance permits to reflect recent amendments to the California Retail Food Code and in addition to other requirements to revise existing definitions of various other terms to reflect state law definitions in said code, and to amend the public works code to include a definition for compact mobile food operations and to expand the Department of Public Works Street Vending Authority to include regulation of compact mobile food operations and to require that the department consult with the Department of Public Health and the Fire Department when issuing rules and regulations that regulate street vendors.

Madam Clerk, please call the role on this item.

Mahmoud I, Supervisor Mandelman.

I Mandelman I, Supervisor Melgar.

Melgar I, Supervisor Sauter.

Sauter I, Supervisor Cheryl.

Cheryl I, Supervisor Walton.

Walton, I, Supervisor Wong.

Wong I, Supervisor Chan.

Chan I, Supervisor Chen.

Chen I, and Supervisor Dorsey.

Dorsey, I.

There are 10 ayes.

Without objection, the ordinance is passed on first reading.

Madam Clerk, please call item number nine.

Item nine, this is an ordinance to de-appropriate approximately 34.36 million from permanent premium and comp time salaries, and to appropriate approximately 34.36 million to overtime salaries in the police department to support the department's projected increases in overtime as required per administrative code, Section 3.17 in fiscal year 2025 through 2026.

Colleagues, can we take this item same house, same call without objection, the ordinance is passed on first reading.

Madam Clerk, please call it a number 10.

Item 10, this is a resolution to retroactively authorize animal care and control to accept and expend an approximate 100,000 gift value from the Wilt Living Trust in support of various animal care and control operational needs.

Effective September 30th, 2025.

Let's take this item, same house, same call.

Without objection, the resolution is adopted.

Madam Clerk, please call items 11 and 12 together.

Items 11 and 12 are two resolutions that approve and authorize the Director of Property to execute second amendments to leases of two addresses from KLW Investments LLC.

Item 11 is for approximately 11,000 square feet of office space at 3119, 3125, and 3127 Street to extend the term by four years and six months.

March 31, 2026, for a total term, July 1st, 2015 through September 30th, 2030, and to grant a five-year option to renew the lease at an annual base rent of approximately 410,000 for continuing use by the Human Services Agency.

And item 12.

This item executes the second amendment to a lease of approximately 39,000 square feet of office space at 3120 Mission Street to extend the term by four years and six months.

March 31st, 2026, for a total term from July 1st, 2015 through September 30th, 2030, and to grant a five-year option to renew the lease at an annual base rent of 1.2 million for continuing use by the Human Services Agency.

Let's take these items, same house, same call without objection, the resolutions are adopted.

And with that, Madam Clerk, I think we should go to our 230 special order.

Yes, the special order at 230 is the recognition of commendations for meritorious service to the city and county of San Francisco.

And I believe that first up today is District 6 Supervisor Matt Dorsey.

Thank you, President Mandelman.

Colleagues, today I am proud to recognize an extraordinary leader, mentor, and force in our city, Misha Olivis.

Take your vows.

She has carried that ethos forward in her career for more than 30 years, which I'm guessing was beginning around when she was five or six years old.

And she has dedicated her life to uplifting young people and strengthening the neighborhoods she calls home.

As co-founder of United Players, and its director of community and family engagement, Misha has helped to build something truly special, a beloved and widely respected organization that serves youth, among others, by holding them close through mentorship, academic support, and leadership development.

And for so many of those young people, Misha is not only a leader, she's Auntie Misha.

A steady presence, a source of love, accountability, and belief.

During the pandemic, when so many of our young people were at risk of falling through the cracks, Misha and her team stepped up in extraordinary ways.

Through the SOMA Youth Collaborative with West Bay, they created safe supportive spaces where students could learn, connect, and simply be kids again.

They made sure young people had meals, mentorship, and a place to belong because, as Misha reminds us, you can't learn if you're hungry, and you can't thrive if you don't feel connected.

But what perhaps stands out most prominently is how Misha defines community, not as a concept but as a responsibility.

Her work is rooted in a simple but powerful belief which has long served as UP's motto and whose enduring truth resonates throughout the Somman neighborhood.

It takes the hood to save the hood.

That means that means showing up, not just when it's easy, but especially when it's hard.

It means meeting young people where they are, understanding their experiences, and building the kind of trust that endures.

It means creating a culture where care, connection, and community come first, and where all young people know that they are seen, supported, and valued.

Misha is also a proud mom of two, and as many in the community will tell you, a mother figure to far more than just her own children.

She teaches resilience, she models strength, and she brings a spirit of mindfulness and compassion into everything she does.

Misha O'Livis represents the very best of San Francisco.

She is a leader who doesn't just talk about change, she makes it happen, one young person at a time, one family at a time, one community at a time, and our city is inestimably better for it.

Misha, thank thank you for your decades of service, your unwavering commitment, and for the love you bring to the work that you do for our city every day.

Congratulations on this.

Hold up.

We have we have other supervisors who want to say nice things about you.

So you're gonna have to wait a few moments.

Supervisor Walton.

Trying to make it end.

Nope.

Thank you, President Mendelman.

Uh Misha, I just want to say one that obviously everybody in this room and most certainly me have so much respect for you and your work that you've done in our communities out of respect for uh my other colleagues.

That's the only reason you're not an honoree of mine at any point in time.

Um but the work that you've done, not just in the South of the Market, not just in your community, but entire city is really unmatched.

And we have a lot of children that go from everywhere that go to UP and receive services.

And so I just want to thank you for your continued commitment.

I know it's a lot of work working with our young people, especially these days, but you continue to do it day in and day out.

And as someone who used to work for the Department of Children, Youth and Families, and just know how UP started all the work that you've done, and to see the impact that you are making now is just something that is wonderful to watch.

And so I just want to say congratulations to you.

This is well deserved, and I look forward to, of course, seeing you continue to do all the great work in community.

Thank you.

So it's been amazing to see the program in just a month grow already with the youth violence prevention program that you started uh in the tenderline.

Um seems like there's more and more kids showing up there.

They want a bigger space.

Um so thank you again for continuing to uh make our city safer uh and giving hope to so many children and youth uh throughout San Francisco.

We are in your debt.

Thank you.

Supervisor Melgar.

Um hi, Misha.

Supervisor Dorsey, thank you so much uh for doing the commendation for this wonderful woman.

Uh, in addition to all the great things that my colleagues have already talked about, Misha is a legend in youth development uh here in San Francisco.

And um, you know, this recognition is that she is, of course, in the pantheon of the mamas of the community.

Um, there are literally hundreds of young people, and people who are maybe not so young anymore, um, who would not have succeeded, but for your love, attention, care, thoughtfulness, um, and all of the things that you have done for generations of our youth, uh, the work that you've done around anti-violence, your particular love for the community in the South of Market, uh, and the care that you have provided to the supports that exist for families raising kids here in the city.

So thank you so much.

It has been an honor to watch you and your career all these years, and I'm so happy that we're honoring you.

We could go on for another 20 minutes as we worked our way through each of the supervisors saying nice things about United Players and about your work, but I think we'll let you speak now.

Thank you, because I'm literally crawling out of my skin.

Uh thank you, Supervisor Dorsey.

Thank you, supervisors.

I really wanted to say no uh when Dominica reached out and asked me.

Um, but I took it.

Um it has truly been my honor and pleasure to serve San Francisco to serve its young people.

I am a born and raised city kid.

Um, and so I did that today for those of us who are here who will be here.

Um I have four kids, two grandkids.

Um, and it has been my you know just honor and privilege to be able to serve San Francisco and its young people.

Um I didn't have comments planned because I was crawling out of my skin.

But I wanted to ask my UP Westway family to stand up.

Um I also could not say no because of them.

Um this family is a force.

What we have created is beautiful and magical, and a lot of people who have graced these seats many, many years past, didn't think we could do it, but we have, and we have continued to because all things are possible in community with God, with love.

You know we know that times are hard and only getting harder.

But it is these people that make San Francisco special.

It is these people that keep San Francisco alive.

It is these people that keep San Francisco growing and of course like Sharice Dorsey is amazing and a force and I'm honored to be like in the same recognition with her but thank you thank you thank you.

I don't feel like I work because I give love and I receive love and um you know hard times come and go we bury children.

Sometimes we bury children and we also celebrate their graduations we celebrate their children their marriages their travel and so thank you again Supervisor Dorsey for selecting me even though I was very reluctant and thank you San Francisco.

I freaking love this place I can't imagine being anywhere else okay up next from district seven supervisor Melgar.

Thank you Mr.

President today I am so excited to honor a daughter of District 7 our own Brit Alexandria Benton will you please come up so Britt grew up in Ingleside Terraces she attended preschool at San Francisco State kindergarten in first grade at Commodore Sloat Elementary School which is our you know local elementary school um she attended Lincoln High School and went on to work at Sunset Youth Services.

Britt's journey as someone born and raised uh in District 7 to live in District 7 and work in District 7.

She currently serves of course as we all know as a government affairs coordinator at the California Academy of sciences and I know there's many folks here in the audience from the Academy.

Yay Academy she has worked uh in that capacity to bring access and exploration to our communities and to bridge the world of science with the world of civics throughout her work at the academy Brit has connected communities to learning about the natural world and open communication and resource channels for young people and families to appreciate the natural world and to build the efforts of sustainability conservation she is helping build a new generation of California stewards fighting climate change in a more sustainable future for our planet through twists and turns in her careers Britt has demonstrated unmatched resilience adaptability and a personable character because we all love her and know her to be that person with a smile from the academy she has always entered a room entered a conversation and entered a situation with grace and kindness making her an outstanding public service leader.

Even on the dark days we have uh recently experienced with the passing of Claude the alligator Brit has always maintained that charm that warmth that optimism and unwavering work ethic we are so grateful for Brit's influence and her many contributions to the city and county of San Francisco and I am so honored to commend her at the Board of Supervisors meeting today.

Um, I am at a loss for wires because I didn't know I did all of that, but I bought some of it.

Um, first and foremost, I would like to thank the board and thank you, Supervisor Myrna Melgar for um honoring me.

I was very shocked to hear about this because I said, really?

Oh, who me?

But um, I first and foremost, I do want to thank my village because it, you know, it takes one.

I want to thank my parents for loving me and giving me their all, along with my siblings.

Um, I don't know, wow, I should have had more talking points, but this is a good time to shout out just all of the women in my life from Amy to Leela, my sisters, Dawn, Vicky.

Um, also want to give I Kwan a shout out because he nudged me and said, Hey, you know, you should get into leadership.

Come into this role right quick and see what happens.

And um, this is what happened.

Um, also, just one last thing.

I do want to give a shout out to my mother.

Um, my mother, Nan Benton, she was a forced to be wrecking with.

She was a D5.

Her both my parents were D5 um bar owners.

I'm just gonna say that.

And they just taught me.

I don't know, my mom.

Sh she, if it wasn't out for her, I'm gonna tell you that she taught me the importance of um womanhood, community, um, being who you are and loving the skin that you're in.

She also taught me about integrity and order and love, and most importantly, family and community.

And that's all I have to say.

Thank you, everybody.

Thank you for honoring me.

Thank you, everybody.

Thank you, President Mandelman.

Colleagues, it is my honor to rise today to recognize and celebrate an extraordinary leader, a tireless advocate, and a true champion for our young people.

Sharice Dorsey Smith.

Since 2007, Sharice has dedicated her career to the San Francisco Department of Children, youth, and their families, steadily rising through the ranks with purpose, integrity, and an unwavering commitment to youth development.

Today, as executive director, she brings not only deep institutional knowledge, but a lived passion for ensuring every young person in our city has an opportunity to thrive.

Born and raised in Southern California, Sharice often says she is from the Bay by way of LA.

A reflection of the life she has built here in the Bay Area.

As first in her family to attend college at UC Santa Cruz, and as the eldest of four, she understood early on that caring for and uplifting others was not just a responsibility, but her calling.

She has never looked back.

Throughout her career, from San Francisco School Volunteers to the Urban Services YMCA, and ultimately DCYF.

Sharice has worked to bridge the gap between community and government.

She has led with vision, creating programs like DCYF University to strengthen community-based organizations, expanding opportunities for youth with disabilities through the citywide inclusion collaborative, and overseeing critical investments that directly impact the lives of young people and families across our city.

Her leadership has been especially impactful in times of crisis.

During the COVID 19 pandemic, Sharice led the community hubs initiative, creating safe supporting spaces for students and families when they needed it most.

For this work, she was rightfully recognized with the 2022 San Francisco Good Government Award.

And her impact continues from launching initiatives like the Literacy and Math School Pilot, Summer Together, and the Student Success Fund to successfully leading a historic 115 million dollar investment into community-based organizations.

Sharice has demonstrated what it means to lead with both heart and strategy.

But beyond titles and accomplishments, what truly sets Sharice apart is her unwavering belief in supporting the whole child, meeting young people where they are and ensuring they are surrounded by the resources, care, and opportunities they deserve.

And I'm so happy to say that I'm excited to have worked with you for two plus years at DCYF.

And I knew that you would be in this leadership position even back then.

And even when I left DCYF, you were there to give advice and help me with programmatic expertise, some of which still is being instituted today.

Your work has touched countless lives across San Francisco.

Your leadership has strengthened our communities, uplifted our families, and created a brighter future for our youth.

So today we say thank you, we honor you, we celebrate you, and cra congratulations on your outstanding service to the city and county of San Francisco and the children and families.

Thank you.

Thank you, President.

Um, and thank you, Supervisor Walton, for uh this really great commendation.

I have had the pleasure of working with Sharice for uh almost two decades really since I was at the Jamestown Community Center, and uh have always appreciated her great strategic mind, uh, but also just her calm emotional uh strength because no matter how bad things get, Sharice always has a plan.

Sharice always has a plan and can break it down and explain it to you in a way that you'll understand it.

So I uh just appreciate you and above all appreciate everything you have done for the young people of our community.

I think that you know, when crises happen, which invariably they do, um, people like you are what saves today, and you have done it over and over again.

So I'm grateful for you.

I am also grateful that you have stepped up into this leadership position.

That was not, you know, a given.

I'm just so glad that you did.

And I'm looking forward to many years of working with you to make sure that um young people and families in our city succeed.

So thank you again, Supervisor Walton, for this, and congratulations, Sharice.

Supervisor Chan.

Thank you, President Mendelman.

Uh, I remember uh as budget committee chair, I remember that it was a very tough time when um now superintendent Maria Sue, but then our DCYF director have to transition uh and suddenly uh Sherie showed up at the budget committee during some serious tough time.

It was just wrapping up DCYF, just wrapping up five-year RFP and going into a budget deficit, and suddenly things landed on her lap.

And I remember the first uh budget committee hearing that Sharice came and presented.

I remember I went back to office and I immediately called Maria Sue and I said, Who is this Cherice Dorsey Smith?

She is awesome.

She cut she came in, no nonsense, she presented the budget, she defended the decisions and making sure that you know, be it the five-year RFP results, uh, be it the appeal uh process as well as student success implementation.

She had answered to every question that I had, and she was firm and she uh was assertive and she know she knew her things.

Um and I and then you know, then subsequently we met again uh at the Free City College Oversights Committee.

I showed up again and asking some really tough questions.

Uh, and Sharice was again there to answer every single one of them, even though they're such a vast majority, like different things, student success, free city, um, or you know, with the RFP uh with DCYF, like the entire um five-year worth of grants.

It's amazing that you know it all, you answer questions at any moment.

Um, that is the kind of leadership city department needs, and that our city deserves, especially our kids and our young people and families.

You're an amazing leader.

I'm so glad that Supervisor Walton honoring you today.

You more than deserving the honor that you're being recognized.

You are truly amazing and truly a great leader.

We thank you for your service.

Okay.

I'm gonna try not to cry.

Ah, all right.

Thank you, Supervisor Walton and all the supervisors for this honor.

I'm deeply humbled and truly grateful.

I want to thank everyone who came out today.

Oh my god, there's so many people.

Um your presence matters, your support matters, and I don't take any of that for granted.

I still blame my child.

Oh my god!

Having a daughter!

Oh my goodness.

Alex, this is all your fault, little girl.

I love you.

Um I know I stand on the shoulders and backs of many who have come before me.

Some who are in this room today, Misha.

Met her way back in my Americor time.

Um tell y'all to know that.

Um for that, I am forever thankful and in constant awe of who you are and what you all do daily without thanks and without recognition.

So I accept this honor on your behalf as well.

Most of you know I'm not someone who seeks the spotlight.

Like I don't even, I'm like, why am I up here?

Um I don't do this work for the recognition.

I didn't start off doing any of this for the recognition.

I do this work because it's necessary and because it needs to be done.

When I first started my career, I never imagined that I would be standing here as the executive director of the Department of Children's Families.

I mean, I joked about it, but I never sat long enough to actually, you know, set my sights on it.

So if you would have told me this is where I would be today, March 24th, 2027, I would have been like, you lie.

So I stand here today, not just honored, but clear in my purpose.

I oversee a department whose tagline says, we want to make San Francisco a great place to grow up.

And that question is, what does that really mean?

For me, it means committing to serving the whole child in its and in their entirety.

Serving the whole child means understanding that a young person's potential cannot be separated from their circumstances.

It means recognizing that the academic success alone is not enough.

A child cannot learn if they are hungry, they cannot focus if they're navigating trauma, they cannot dream if they don't feel safe seeing and valued.

If we truly want to serve children and youth and make sure that they are thriving, it takes more than intention.

It takes commitment, it takes many people, everybody here in this room coming together to ensure that young people have the resources, have the opportunities, the support systems, and any and everything that they need to succeed.

It requires more than words, it requires more than programs, it requires all of us showing up, staying committed, and doing the hard and consistent work no matter what.

Thriving just doesn't happen by chance.

It happens when we are deliberate, when we are intentional, when we set aside all the egos and the drama, and we're really here for children, for youth and for their families.

That I didn't want to be another statistic.

I didn't want to become a part of the narrative so often written for black girls growing up in Compton, California.

I attended a blood school while living in a crypt neighborhood.

If folks know about that, those two colors do not match.

And it is a very dangerous.

But I'm the oldest of three and was raised in a single parent household, just barely getting by.

And now, 33 years later, yes, I'm dating myself.

33 years later, I find myself holding on to the same conviction, but with the deeper responsibility.

But this time, I don't want to be part of a statistic about an adult who has failed a child.

Rita Pearson, a professional educator once said, every child deserves a champion, an adult who will never give up on them, who understands the power of connection, and insists that they become the best that they could possibly be.

So I choose again to serve the whole child to be that champion.

Because when we choose that, when we're fully intentionally and unapologetic, unapologetically, we are not just changing individual lives, we are shaping their future of our communities.

We are building something stronger, more equitable, and more just.

Edward and her exceptional team at Sheridan Elementary School have worked very collaboratively towards continued improvement as a result.

Sheridan has become a safe space for the community, and as so much so that former students now returning to enroll their own children.

It is my great pleasure to honor Dr.

Edwards for decades of services during Women's History Month.

Thank you, Dr.

Edward, for leading with your heart, with love for the Late Wheel and for District 11 for San Francisco and for supporting every student, every student with the foundation that they need to thrive.

Thank you so much.

Thank you, Commissioner Chin.

I was very surprised when I got the phone call that I got this honor, but I accept it because we at Sheridan have been working very hard to help our students, putting students first, making sure that every student has what they need.

So I accept this not just for me, but for my whole Sheridan family and community.

I want to thank my family.

And uh as a long or lifelong resident of Lakeview, uh I'm very excited to have this honor.

Thank you very much.

Next up from District One, Supervisor Chan.

Thank you.

Um President Mendelman, colleagues, today in celebration of Women's History Month, we're honoring leaders of a very critical woman, uh critical leaders of a very critical movement for women.

Um it is the women's housing coalition.

We're honoring the coalition uh because it is and it has been a powerful movement and a powerful network of over 22 organizations and growing uh in different housing and services uh sectors committed to the same vision.

Save housing opportunities for all women in San Francisco.

Every night in San Francisco, there are over 3,000 women sleeping on the streets.

But according to the report, this number is grossly underestimated.

Women experiencing homelessness are undercounted and underserved.

And unfortunately, homelessness in women and children is growing faster than any other population.

They are often victims and survivors of domestic violence, sexual assaults, and trauma, and are often re-victimized while living on the street.

The women's housing coalition breaks the cycle of violence and homelessness through compassionate care and a belief, strong belief that housing is a fundamental right for everyone.

For me in 2020, their work centers and uplift women with dignity and respect, leading to healthier families and communities.

Coalition members cover a wide array of safety net services from shelters to re-entry programs, hotlines, domestic violence, youth and older adult support, human trafficking services, and so much more.

Last year, the coalition has really held all leaders accountable, including all the women supervisors in this chambers and allies to declare that San Francisco as a sanctuary for women seeking housing and to urge city departments to invest our resources and investments for safe shelter, affordable housing, and wraparound services, specifically for women and women identify survivors of domestic abuse, sexual exploitation and violence, human trafficking, and street entrapment and trauma.

But we all know there's so much more work to do, and uh I know the coalition has dedicated to fight this fight until every woman is off the streets living in safe, stable, and secure housing.

And for that, I'm just so grateful to the coalition.

You know, today we have, I know there's so many more leaders uh involving with the coalition, but today we have Rebecca Jackson, um Eve Langston and Sammy uh Rayner here who are actually the coalition co-chairs.

Uh but I know that my colleagues also want to say a few words in honor of your your coal in honor of your leadership and the coalition.

Um but truly uh the coalition has been wonderful, um, but they're badasses.

Uh they really are.

And they hold us accountable.

And I really am just here to bring you back to this chamber.

You've been in this chamber as advocates many, many times and voice your concern and be our leaders.

But I think this is a moment that we get to honor you and say thank you and thank you for your work and that we see you, we recognize your leadership, and that we uh will continue to work with you and do we respect your leadership and uh thank you for holding us accountable.

And Supervisor Melgar.

Thank you, and thank you, Supervisor Chan, for uh recognizing this wonderful organization and uh recognizing Rebecca and Sammy and Eve for the wonderful work that they do every day, holding us accountable.

Uh, this month, as we have unveiled, you know, a women's agenda in our city.

There are uh no more important building blocks in that agenda than housing, then the shelter over people's heads that leads to security and safety and success for themselves and their families.

So uh what you you are doing, God's work.

Thank you so much for um putting together a roadmap to success for women and for all people here in San Francisco.

Uh, we appreciate you as supervisor.

Chances, we see you, we recognize you.

Thank you for everything you do.

Supervisor Chen.

Thank you, President.

I also just want to echo uh the two supervisors, but I am very inspired that the coalition always standing at the intercessions of housing justice and severe center care.

Um, you are a powerful network that it's over 15 organizations, very dedicated to uh simple but profound truth.

Housing is fundamental human rights.

Um the women's housing coal refuse to let the over 30 3,000 women who experience homelessness on uh any given night remain invisible.

Thank you for making sure that their needs uh hurt.

Um thank you also for your tireless advocacy for those escaping domestic violence, tra uh trafficking, and system displacement.

Uh you again, I don't think that's more that's that's any other more word that I I can continue to use to describe you know the uh the braveness, um, the advocacy word, the leadership, the um uh the love, the love.

Um thank you so much and well the floor is yours.

Oh, thank you.

Uh good afternoon, and thank you to the entire board and a special thank you to Supervisor Connie Chan, not just for this recognition, but for your continued support and belief in our work.

We are beyond honored to stand here today representing the San Francisco Women's Housing Coalition.

We just want to take a moment to acknowledge the leadership in this room.

Um who in recent weeks have taken meaningful and very important steps to uplift women in San Francisco that matters.

Being seen matters, being heard matters.

And our hope is that today is not just a recognition, that it's more than a fleeting moment, but part of this larger momentum that we continue moving forward, safety for women together as partners and allies.

Our coalition is a scrappy one.

We're just five or six years old, and we are a group of organizations, yes, but more than that, we are a group of fighters, born out of urgency at a time when the realities and needs facing women and survivors were impossible to continue to ignore.

We came together not because it was easy, but because it was necessary, because what we were seeing in our work demanded something bigger, demands to be seen and heard.

We don't just talk about the issues.

We live them in our daily work as individuals, as organizations, and as a coalition.

We see and we feel when and where systems are falling short.

And we are working hard to break down the barriers that make it harder for women to be safe and access housing.

And at the same time, we see extraordinary resilience.

We see hope.

So cheers to CJCJ Cameo House, Black Women Revolt Against Domestic Violence, San Francisco Safe House, Community Ford, Freedom Ford, the hype center, the Mary Elizabeth Innce 1914.

La Casa de las Madres, homeless prenatal program, the women's building, young women's freedom center, Asian women's shelter, compass, family services, women Inc., the San Francisco Collaborative Against Human Trafficking.

And last but not least, Ms.

Roma Guy, who mentors many of us in our continued fight for women.

This recognition from the city means a great deal.

Though we are young, we are mighty.

In a few short years, we've been able to accomplish many milestones.

We've held a citywide retreat with all department heads identifying the gaps that we see on the ground.

Last year we launched a citywide unhoused women's needs assessment survey, which is currently being analyzed.

We look forward to sharing with each of you and the city department heads the results of that survey through another city retreat and maybe a later hearing.

This isn't just limited to the women of San Francisco.

We are supporting women across the state.

That would give prosecutors the ability to pursue felony charges when a criminal protective order violation indicates a credible and serious threat.

In closing, we accept this honor with so much gratitude.

Thank you for making not only our coalition but women seen in this city.

And the opportunity for us to once again present the urgency and need for our community to do better for women in our community.

And really for us, I think it's about coming back to how are we going to solve homelessness as a community, not just for women, but for everyone, and every single member of this board is aligned on safety.

And that is what our programs and our services represent is bringing that safety into the shelters and the safety net that should be there to catch our community.

So thank you for this opportunity to continue our partnership.

All right.

Next up, District 2, Supervisor Cheryl.

Colleagues, today I am honored to welcome Lynn Davis up to the podium.

Lynn, where are you?

There you are.

In celebration of Women's History Month, it is an absolute honor to commend you, Lynn, for your decades of dedicated service to the Opera Plaza neighborhood and your extraordinary commitment to building community right here in San Francisco, marking this moment as Lynn ends her tenure after more than a decade of leadership as president of the Opera Plaza HOA.

Born in Phoenix, Arizona, Lynn is a Northwestern University graduate who came to San Francisco in 1976, making this city her permanent home, rooting herself here for nearly 50 years, and channeling her energy into the people and the neighborhoods that she loves.

For 36 years, Lynn worked in one of San Francisco's most prestigious law firms, Pillsbury, Madison and Sutro, managing their administrative operations and coordinating the opening of multiple offices.

She also worked for 15 years as a member of United Way, helping to raise millions of dollars from staff and attorneys.

And if that wasn't enough, she helped coordinate the San Francisco Bar Association's Food from the Bar campaign for the San Francisco and Marin County Food Banks.

Since retiring in 2012, Lynn has devoted herself fully to community service, volunteering with Bread and Roses, supporting the Tenderloin Community School, serving in the San Francisco Police Department, Northern Stations Community Police Advisory Board, and becoming NERT certified to serve her neighbors in times of emergency.

And as president of the Opera Plaza HOA Board of Directors, a role she's held since 2014.

Lynn has been a steady, compassionate steward of her community, organizing and leading community meetings with skill and with care.

Lynn is also a member of San Francisco Village, where she focuses on enriching the lives of our seniors through writers' workshops and embodying her lifelong belief that everyone deserves connection, dignity, and a voice.

Everyone, everybody.

Lynn is there for everybody.

When Eric T A K E T, a beloved fixture outside the book sink at Opera Plaza for 30 years, was attacked and hospitalized in 2013.

It was Lynn who stepped forward to help locate his family and sure he was cared for, spending her own time and energy to help a person who had no one else to turn to.

Lynn's effort on Eric's behalf exemplify who she is, someone who sees the humanity in every person in her community and who acts on that recognition with quiet, determined grace.

Lynn embodies the spirit of San Francisco at its best, practical, compassionate, and deeply rooted in a belief that a neighborhood is only as strong as the care its residents give to each other.

It is my understanding that every morning you sit in your great grandfather's mahogany rocking chair and look eastward to see the San Francisco Bay and East Bay Hills.

So from all of us, I wish that you continue to enjoy your mornings and your adventures ahead in your next chapter.

Lynn, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors, thank you for your extraordinary service to Opera Plaza, to San Francisco's elders, and to its most vulnerable residents, and to the vision of a city where no one is invisible and everyone belongs.

Lynn, the floor is yours.

Thank you.

And now I can laugh because all of this was just said.

And maybe I'll say two sentences from this.

The teacher was Angelus Arian.

And within moments, I knew I would study with her during fourfold way courses in 1998 and through 2001.

Her major themes continue to interweave through my life.

One walking the practical path with mystical feet.

I hear that every day.

Walking the practical path with a mystical feet.

Two, both slash and comma and that's a little harder to talk about because sometimes you get stuck and you don't know how to get yourself unstuck.

And so what you do, or what I do, is I think both, slash, and, comma, and the third is vision quests.

And I did those decades ago, and it changed my life.

So then in 1976, I took a three-week job at the corporate law firm that ultimately shortened to Pillsbury.

Three weeks.

Forty years later, I retired.

Don't ask me why.

But I did.

I worked many offices around the United States, and I just relished making both and decisions around complicated administrative blues.

The other thing is I knew I needed to see water, because that's what roots me to this planet Earth.

And even though I was born in Phoenix, Arizona, there wasn't a lot of water, except for the Verde River in Phoenix, Arizona.

But it was time for me to get to San Francisco, so I connected with my older brother, Jack, and his two children, Sarah and Hayden.

And they, my older brother, love his heart, built houseboats on Channel Creek in San Francisco, right off of third.

And I think he built four houseboats because two and a half sunk.

And never again came back up that I remember.

And then I bought my condominium at Opera Plaza in 2008 and joined the board of directors and became Madam Presidente, because there were a lot of Spanish people there.

And at Max's, one of the wonderful people when he saw me always said, Madam Presidente.

Okay, each morning I sit in my grandfather's mahogany rocking chair that came all the way from the East Coast, and I look forward to seeing the San Francisco Bay and the East Bay Hills.

So that is Lynn Louise Davis.

Thank you.

All right.

Next up we have District 3 Supervisor Sauter.

Thank you, President Mandelman.

Colleagues, today I have the honor of welcoming Bree Mann, Executive Director of Fisherman's Wharf Community Benefit District.

Bree, would you please come up and join us?

As we celebrate Women's History Month, I'm so happy that San Francisco has a champion in Brie to shape one of our city's most important spaces, Fisherman's Wharf.

Brie was selected last year as the new executive director of Fisherman's Wharf CBD, a process in which she beat out more than 270 other applicants for the role.

She has 18 years of experience in the public space stewardship and previously served as the executive director of Yerba Buena Gardens Conservancy.

Breed does not have an easy job in representing Fisherman's Wharf.

She must weigh the needs of tourism with the push to attract locals and the balance of a working waterfront with proud roots, with a need to stay modern in a competitive tourism market.

But she approaches this work with dedication, optimism, and a dogged persistence that is getting resulted.

Because of this, under her leadership, there is renewed excitement and momentum throughout all of the wharf.

Restaurants are filling up again.

Foot traffic is picking up, a new public plaza will open later this year.

The Sky Star Ferris Wheel is delighting passengers with breathtaking views.

And Bree has found a reason to celebrate every occasion in the wharf.

Be it the recent Crab Crab Crawl, the peer party summer concert series, or very creative activations for the recent Super Bowl.

She leads an incredible team, and I see a number of them here today.

And she works to empower them each day to do their best work, whether that be cleaning and taking care of public spaces, planning events, boosting the wharf as a tourism attraction.

Longtime merchants, hospitality partners, the fishing industry have all felt heard and supported by Bree in her understanding of the importance of the role the CBD plays in providing a space for collaboration and teamwork across the wharf.

Our city is very lucky to have her as a partner in this work and her team at the CBD, and we know we are in good hands.

Thank you.

Thank you for this very special honor and a very special thank you to Supervisor Sauter for selecting me.

Your leadership is exemplary, and we're very lucky to have you as our supervisor.

And I feel so very blessed to do the work that I do.

And I fervently believe in leading with heart and integrity.

And I'm so proud and tickle pink to be able to work in the city and county of San Francisco, as I think a lot of us in these chambers feel the same.

As a committed partner to the city and county of San Francisco, the Fisherman's Wharf Community Benefit District plays an intrinsic role.

The CBD works hard to provide vital services and support that ensure the wharf remains a positive and welcoming destination for both locals and visitors from afar for generations to come.

I am deeply honored to receive this commendation, especially during Women's History Month.

And I'm also very, very lucky and fortunate to be surrounded by intelligent, capable, and impactful women, and to my team specifically on Cecile, Caitlin, Marlowe, and Josh.

Thank you very much for your work, and I will share this honor with them.

Thank you.

And from District 4, Supervisor Wong.

Hello, may have the American Red Cross come on up.

A visionary humanitarian, a civil war nurse, and a relentless advocate for those in need.

Clara Barton founded the American Red Cross in 1881 and helped shape our nation's commitment to neutral, compassionate relief in times of crisis.

Her legacy continues to inspire millions and remains at the heart of the Red Cross mission.

Here in the Bay Area, the Red Cross continues to lead with the same spirit of compassion and professionalism.

This year is especially meaningful.

It marks the 120th anniversary of the partnership between the Red Cross and the city and county of San Francisco, a partnership that began in the aftermath of the 1906 earthquake and has guided our shared commitment to readiness and recovery ever since.

Every day, often without fanfare, Red Cross volunteers and staff step forward when San Franciscans are facing their most difficult moments.

When there is a fire in the middle of the night, when a family has been displaced, when a patient needs life-saving blood, or when disaster strikes, the Red Cross is there.

They provide shelter, food, and emergency support after disasters.

They maintain a safe and reliable blood supply that saves lives every single day.

They train our neighbors in the CPR, first aid, and emergency preparedness, and they support military members, veterans, and their families with round the clock global services.

Behind all this is a network of volunteers, ordinary people doing extraordinary things for others.

I also want to mention my own office's close connection to the Red Cross.

My staff, uh Jessica served as a AmeriCorps member with the Red Cross.

And I myself, in one of my first jobs out of college, I served for one year as a AmeriCorps Red Cross member of the Bay Area Chapter, where I served as a disaster preparedness specialist, CPR instructor, and during my experiences with the uh National Guard when there was the Tubbs fire, I was deployed to the Santa Rosa Evacuee Shelter and is the largest evacuee shelter during the Tubbs fire and work closely with Red Cross volunteers that were dedicating weeks of their time, volunteering their lives to help support those that were in need and in need of shelter.

Red Cross Month is a reminder that our community is the strongest when we lift one another up.

So today, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I want to thank the American Red Cross of the Bay Area Chapter for their continued service, partnership, and dedication to San Francisco.

It is my honor to present this proclamation recognizing March 2026 as American Red Cross Month.

Joining us today are Board Chair Kenzie Ferguson, Government Relations Manager Ariana Nassiri, and Regional Chief Executive Officer Justin Mueller.

We're grateful for your partnership and leadership.

Good afternoon.

First off, I need to start by expressing my gratitude.

Supervisor Wong, thank you for honoring us and to everyone on the board for having us here today.

You already mentioned 145 years ago, Clara Barton started a legacy, women leading through philanthropic efforts, and that legacy lives on.

And today I'm joined by my board chair, Kenzie Ferguson, and she is going to talk a little bit more about the impact right here in our community.

Thank you, Justin.

And thank you, Supervisor Wong.

It's nice to see you again.

And um just so happens I finally got a chance to live in San Francisco in 2019.

Um lived down on the peninsula and finally got to live in this glorious city.

So as Justin was saying, the American Red Cross is a congressionally chartered nonprofit established in the principle of preventing and alleviating human suffering.

In the past fiscal year, we've responded to over 860 disaster events right here in the Bay Area.

The majority of these were home fires.

We've opened thousands of disaster cases, collected over 150,000 units of blood, and trained close to 100,000 people in first aid, life-saving CPR.

And it really doesn't stop there.

Our volunteers stand with the military families for the moment.

Their loved ones are sworn in to serve this country.

Through deployments, emergencies, and times of crisis, enabling connection when it matters most.

This includes over 8,000 families here in the Bay Area.

Our hearts are with those all around the globe as we remain committed to help in times of international crisis.

We stand alongside Red Cross and Red Crescent societies, whose teams are on the ground at this very moment, responding to humanitarian needs and supporting communities with protection, relief, and essential resources.

And as you all have said, our history of service in San Francisco dates back over a century.

And this city is really defined by resiliency.

Earthquakes, wildfires, home fires, even tsunami warnings, you name it, San Francisco has had to live through it.

And the Red Cross has stood alongside this city through it all.

A beacon of hope and recovery for those experiences and some of the greatest hardships in their lives.

This city that is always progressing, that's what I love about this city.

But that progress is only possible thanks to the strength of the relationships between elected officials and community partners.

The Red Cross is made up by the community and works for the community.

With over 90% of the workforce of the Red Cross is comprised of volunteers.

It's a symbol of hope, a sign of people, the people want to play a direct role in keeping communities safe.

So when when folks walk through those doors on Market Street and roll up their sleeves to donate date to donate blood, they're serving the mission and they're saving lives of people just like me.

And the Red Cross was there.

When local volunteers, many of whom are your constituents, put their lives on pause for weeks to deploy to disaster operations across the country, they serve our mission.

And today, by honoring the Red Cross with this proclamation recognizing one of our historic milestones, you are all serving the mission.

The tradition of March is Red Cross Month as well as Women's History Month.

It began 80 years ago, right here.

Sorry, with President Franklin D.

Roosevelt issued the first National Red Cross Month Proclamation.

Almost a century later, the mission and impact of the Red Cross is more relevant than ever.

We hope that today is not just symbolic, but transformative.

Each of your districts is filled with potential opportunities for donor and volunteer recruitment and engagement, disaster resiliency and preparedness, mobile blood drives, and all around humanitarianism.

Together, let's use today as a catalyst to invigorate the partnership between our teams to enable us to meet the humanitarian needs of all San Franciscans.

Once again, I thank you all for the time.

Supervisor Wong, my former board member.

I thank you for the honor we are here to receive today, and I thank you for our continued partnership.

Colleagues, in honor of Women's History Month, it is my honor to recognize Tatiana Alabosi for nearly a decade of service to the Tenderloin and the children and families who call it home.

Tatiana, why don't you come up to the stage and bring your family and friends on as well?

For almost 10 years, Tatiana has helped make the tenderloin safer for children on their way to and from school.

She has become a trusted presence for families and an important part of the neighborhood's everyday life.

Her presence is felt in deeply personal ways, and throughout the tenderloin people speak about her with real affection and gratitude.

Tatiana's own journey to San Francisco reflects a deep commitment to serving others and is a classic American story.

She's born and raised in Russia, graduated from medical university in 1995, and completed her master's degree in medicine in 1998.

After marrying her husband, Jalal Olababsi, she lived and worked in Yemen for 15 years before moving with her family to San Francisco in 2014.

Like many immigrants who came to the city in search of opportunity and stability, she built a new life here through service to her community.

In 2016, Tatiana began volunteering with the Safe Passage Program at the Tenderloin Community Benefit District.

What began as a volunteer work soon grew into a larger role.

Over time, she took on more responsibility, serving as shift lead in 2017, project coordinator in 2018, assistant manager in 2022, and the manager of the Safe Passage Program starting in 2024.

Throughout that work, she has helped connect schools, families, community organizations, and city agencies in support of student safety.

Her efforts have made a real difference for children navigating difficult street conditions in one of San Francisco's most active neighborhoods.

Community members continually describe Tatiana as someone who shows up with consistency and heart.

And that kind of daily care has made her a beloved part of our neighborhood life.

Her work has been recognized across the city.

In 2022, she received the Grassroots Leadership Award from the San Francisco Immigrant Rights Commission for her advocacy on behalf of immigrants and the wider community.

She's also spoken publicly about the safety challenges children face near schools, including the need for improvements on dangerous streets.

An advocacy connected to the Folsom and Howard Streetscape project, she called attention to the fact that children were walking to school alongside fast-moving and aggressive traffic.

She helped make sure those concerns were heard.

And she has paired compassion with advocacy, making sure the experiences of tenderloin children and families are not only acknowledged, acknowledged, but acted on.

At the heart of all this is Tatiana's steady commitment to the well-being of children and families in the tenderloin.

Her work has helped students get to school more safely and has strengthened trust within the community.

As Kate Robinson of the TLCBD said, I've never met anyone more giving, heart-driven community leader in my life.

That sentiment is echoed across the community by those who know Tatiana as a source of kindness, joy, and steadiness, especially during difficult times.

Tatiana, thank you for everything you have done and continue to do for the Tenderloin.

Your dedication has made a lasting difference, and it is an honor to recognize you this woman's history month.

You have shown up for this neighborhood with so much care and love, and your work has left a lasting mark on the tenderloin.

We are so proud to celebrate you and thank you for being such a guiding light every single day on the way to and from work.

Tatiana, can you grab that microphone and speak directly into it, please?

Yes.

Thank you.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you so much for this honor.

I very grateful and I deeply proud to receive this recognition during women history months.

It means to me not only so important not only as woman, it's also important for me as an immigrant, as a mother, and someone who believed deeply in power of community.

My journey here has not been simple.

I was born as Belalse in Russia and grow up and get my full education, and I meet my husband Rasha and me moved together in Yemen, and we live in Yemen for 15 years.

We make our successful career, we grow up our kids.

In 2014, life took us across to country and different culture, and we come to San Francisco and start our new chapter.

Starting COVID in your country, it's not easy.

Like many immigrants, I had to learn a new system, a new language, and found my place again.

But what helped me most was it was community.

People who welcomed us, supported us, and showing kindness for us.

And I started as volunteer, and step by step I get my position.

And I remember I starting on the corner early in the morning, watching family, students, and neighbors passing by.

And I quickly recognize that this work was not only about crossing people.

It was about protect hope.

Support families and showing cute people that their community cares about them.

Over these years.

But this recognition does not belong to me alone.

It belongs to my people, my team, who stand on this corner every day.

Volunteers who working with us, school staff, community partners, and families who believe in creating safe space for children.

Today, during women history months, I also want to recognize this trench of women.

Everywhere.

Women who lit quitly, who support families, who support others of, and who continues to build strong communities even when the work is difficult.

I am proud to stand among so many inspiring women who make a difference every day, often without recognition, but always with heart.

When people care for each other, when we show up for one to other, we can create safety, dignity, and hope, even the most challenged environment.

Thank you for recognition.

I share it with my family, with my team, with my safety stewards, and with my colleague, and with my tenderline community, who inspires me every day.

Thank you for my all health.

And I want to ask you, everyone have mother, have sister, wife, friends, who women, please, buy some small flower for women around you and say thank you, and happy women's months.

Thank you so much, I'm not sure what I'm saying.

With that, Madam Clerk, let's go back to item thirteen.

Item 13, this is a resolution to approve the second amendment to the grant agreement between Lutheran Social Services of Northern California and the Department of Homelessness and Support of Housing for Money Management Services to extend the grant term by 24 months.

June thirtieth, 2026 for a total term of July 1st, 2021 through June 30th, 2028, and to increase the agreement amount by approximately five point two million for a new total of approximately fifteen point two million.

Please call the role on this item.

On item thirteen, Supervisor Mahmood.

Mahmoud, I, Supervisor Mandelman.

Indelman, I, Supervisor Melgar.

Walton I, Supervisor Wong.

Wong I, Supervisor Chan.

Chan I, Supervisor Chin, Chen I, and Supervisor Dorsey.

Dorsey I.

There are 10 ayes.

Without objection, the resolution is adopted.

Madam Clerk, please call it a number 14.

Item 14, this is a resolution to approve a contract number 1334, infrastructure facility project agreement with PRG, Petro Properties LLC for the design, construction, and financing of a bus storage and maintenance facility for the Petro Yard Modernization Project.

Supervisor Chan.

Thank you.

And how we have all these intense debates and trying to push the city forward and meeting the demands of 82,000 units of housing by the state house state housing elements and the state mandates, out of which we know that there should be 56,000 of affordable housing.

And seeing my colleagues, including former supervisors, that really with their Herculine efforts to try to have housing affordable housing at this site for us to come to this conclusion today is rather disappointing.

Not only for me as a budget committee chair that have to approve this and so voted in support of this project as it currently now stands, but also as just uh someone that has been really both working on this but um on and off for for quite some time and as as well as been um hoping to see housing on site um for for quite some time so here we are and um seeing that we should and ought to move this project forward because um not only that it's part of the bond dollar bond bond project that it's upcoming for the voters approval which I support um and that we also see that they are still uh affordable housing project may not be the unit number that we seek uh originally but nonetheless uh it does provide units of affordable housing however because of the significant reduction um and we had this discussion during budget committee last Wednesday um but to ensure that this come out of budget committee in a timely fashion we voted out with recommendation uh with the understanding that I will potentially uh come to you with uh amendments as well as a letter uh updated uh and provided by SFMTA again reiterate the reason of why um from their point of view and from their standpoint this is not financially feasible uh for SFMTA to continue to pursue um and for me is to say well let's make sure that our um and to really urge uh mayor's office of housing and community development to identify funding sources to construct um the much needed housing in the future either be uh part of this project or uh at another site and so with that colleagues I would like to make amendments um to keep the city on track to deliver housing that we need for the community clearly they're non-binding um but I nonetheless I think that this body should make that statement um so that we are consistent from not only what we as a body have approved last year as family zoning plan uh and responding to the state housing mandate um and the amendments that I am proposing today is on page four line five adding the clause whereas in March 2024 the planning commission and board of supervisors each unanimously approve entitlements legislation on file with the clerk of board of supervisors in file number two four zero one three six which is hereby declared to be a part of this resolution as if set forth fully herein for the patrol yard modernization project that allow for the four hundred and sixty five units affordable

Um and the amendments that I am proposing today is on page four, line five, adding the clause, whereas in March 2024, the planning commission and board of supervisors each unanimously approve entitlements legislation on file with the clerk of board of supervisors in file number 240136, which is hereby declared to be a part of this resolution as if set forth fully herein for the patrol yard modernization project that allow for the 465 units affordable housing components with each body citing the widespread and strong public community support for the innovative joint development project.

Then on page 14, line 15 to add further resolve that given the significance reduction of affordable housing units in the patrol yard modernization project after the mid-year engagement process with the community.

The Board of Supervisors urges MOHCD to identify funding sources to construct the infrastructure needed to enable future housing development opportunities as part of the Patrol Yar Modernization Project, and be it further resolved that the Board Supervisor urges SFMTA to identify additional sites and collaborate with MOHCD to deliver 465 units of affordable housing to the community as provided in the entitlement legislation in 2024.

The copies has been distributed and shared with you colleagues, and I hope to have your support.

Thank you.

Does everybody have the amendments that are proposed?

Yes.

Thank you, uh, President Mandelman.

Uh thank you, uh Supervisor Chan for navigating uh this messy situation.

Uh and thank you for your openness to adopting my amendments to your amendments.

I really appreciate the collaboration.

So I um have been you know watching this process for many, many years.

Um, and I have to say that I am really disappointed in the process.

Um, I think the outcome is uh, you know, a result of messiness, you know, and I uh have to say that um, you know, I'm uh your representative to the uh Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

Um that regional board, we have long held to the principle of transit oriented development, transit-oriented communities.

Um, and that means that we maximize a space that's close to uh transit hubs to build housing so people will take public transportation.

Low-income people are less likely to own cars and more likely to take public transportation.

So I am eager to see a plan from our agency that holds to that principle, that has a full inventory of their assets and maximizes their assets towards that.

That being said, you know, this board has also for many years held to the principle of public lands for public use.

Affordable housing is one of those uses, but it is not the only use.

Um, I think where the messiness comes in is that we've sort of blended the lines about who should pay for what and whose responsibility is what.

And promises were made to that community that made the community deeply disappointed after they put in a lot of work and organizing towards something that did not come about, and that is deeply disappointing.

And uh the Metropolitan uh the MT the San Francisco MTA is not the agency responsible for subsidizing affordable housing.

That agency is the mayor's office of housing and community development, and I think there's been a blurring of the responsibilities of that and commitments that were made that shouldn't have been made, frankly, because it made expectations of communities who desperately need housing for something that did not come to fruition.

So I hope that going forward uh we are more intentional, more responsible about our use of resources and what is promised to the community, and above all, not uh taking advantage of the work of the community for stuff that doesn't come through.

Um, thank you again, Supervisor Chan for uh shepherding this through the process and for um coming out the other end and for the language that you're proposing today, which I will be supporting.

Thank you.

Supervisor Chen.

Thank you, Board President.

Um Kali, I'm also deeply believed that uh development on our public lands must be held to a higher standard, and this is why as a city we should be prioritizing this investment in ways that may that not only serve our public infrastructure needs, but also deliver our affordable housing goals.

And I know that uh this modernization project is a long overdue, and I am very much in support of updating the petroleum to better serve the needs of Muni employees and the facilities that need for our transit network.

Um but I am deeply up disappointed in the massive reduction in affordable housing scope for this project.

This is a tremendous policy failure for the agency and our city, and I believe that agency has a duty to problem solve and to develop a plan B to make good on its commitment.

And this is why I also um uh on top of that amendment, I also have introduced a resolution offering additional path forward that will urge the agency to leverage other underutilized public lens in its portfolio to deliver the affordable housing unit that were eliminated.

Um with that, thank you.

Supervisor Walton.

Thank you so much, President Melaminar.

First, just want to thank um all the community that was involved in this process.

A lot of days and a lot of hours to uh even get to a point where we got affordable housing.

If you remember in the beginning, that wasn't the conversation.

Uh and this was also property that at the time was in District 10.

And you know that I am going to do everything I can possibly to make sure that we have affordable housing.

So even from onset, to get the language in the RFP to say at least 50 percent affordable and up to 100 percent was a battle and a fight in itself.

Um partly because again, MTA is not a developer, and there's something that they had to prioritize in terms of making sure that the fleet is taken care of so they can continue to grow and provide quality transit here in the city.

Um but I do you know just want to say that there are times when you get a win, but everybody is not satisfied, and it's not the desired win.

And I look at this at one of those cases.

I can remember in the Super Bowl when the Niners last played Cincinnati, and we were down and before the game, I bet on a blowout, and we won 20 to 16.

Um wasn't the most fun game to watch until the end, but we came out victorious, and this is kind of something like that, because a hundred percent all affordable is a win to me any time.

Um I do want to be clear because I just want to make sure people don't have the impression of all those 400 plus housing was going to be affordable, because that is not the case.

We lost some market rate housing.

We definitely lost some affordable housing, but it was not going to be a hundred percent affordable like we have with these hundred units.

So I can stomach that.

Um I'm I'm actually obviously wish it was more.

We are arbitrary goals set by the state that they just woke up one day and tried to put on us.

Um we have, in my opinion, an arbitrary upzoning plan.

Um and I don't know what's going to be built from that, but I will say that in this case we have a win, but most certainly it's not what everyone desired.

And I think we have to take this win and get some more affordable housing out in our community.

Uh but I definitely uh will support the amendments.

Uh I think it is it says something about the focus and what we need to do and what we want to do on not only public land but just in the future in terms of building.

So making a commitment to look at other sites, making a commitment to look at other resources.

I think it's something that is in line with what the mission should be as a whole if we're going to talk about being a city that tries to meet arbitrary goals.

Thank you, President Manon.

Uh thank you, Supervisor Walton.

Someone from the MTA want to talk with me a little bit.

Mr.

True.

This is the good afternoon, Mr.

President, members of the board.

Judson True, Chief of Staff and Director of External Affairs for the SFMTA here to answer any questions.

Wonder if you could and and I don't love redoing committee hearings at the full board, but I think we're redoing this committee hearing at the full board.

So if we're doing that, I think we need to talk a little bit about the MTA's thinking in changing this project.

And my impression, I mean, Supervisor Chan noted this has been going on for a couple of decades.

Could could you walk uh I think we are all disappointed by this outcome, although I think for different reasons.

But could you talk through what the theory on housing over this uh busyard was, why we need to redo the bus yard, where it got to in terms of the affordability uh commitments and why you are now moving moving away from trying to do housing on top of a podium.

Um, asking for the whole history of the project.

My PowerPoint deck and my talking point, so I'll do my best to cover those items uh succinctly.

Uh I think that the Petro Yard Modernization Project represents a tremendous investment in the future of Muni service in San Francisco.

Uh the yard is uh more than 110 years old.

Uh I think it's 111 now.

We were saying 110 all year last year, now it's 11.

And you know, I think the primary mode of transportation at the time uh was uh you know a horse-drown uh cart of some sort.

So uh the yard is uh seismically unsafe, it's not uh a good place for our uh maintenance staff to maintain the vehicles, uh and about uh about a fifth of our a little more than a fifth of our ridership comes out of the petroleary uh the comes out on buses coming out of the petroleum yard now.

So I think as the agency looked at its its sites, one of the uh opportunities was to start with this site and both get a new bus yard, and then as a as the conversation developed, as Supervisor Walton mentioned, there was also uh through advocacy by him and I'm sure Supervisor Maxwell before him uh with Supervisor Chan in that office to produce housing as part of the project.

So with that vision, as that vision developed, there are two aspects of the housing.

One was a typical infill affordable housing development on the 17th and Bryant frontage of the project, which we now estimate with most CD could generate about 100 units.

That project is in process now, and although it is you know awaits the approval of this project agreement to to sort of go to the next steps.

The other more visionary aspect of the of the project was to put uh allow for a four-story building that would then be strong enough for housing to go on top of what's called the podium of the project.

And I think that that really cuts two different ways.

On the one hand, you could say that we and we said often as an agency that we would be among the first uh busyards in North America and or in the United States to have housing above the bus yard, and said that in a visionary positive way, but I think it also ended up also in the situation while wow, we would be the first to have housing above a busyard, and maybe there's a challenge with with doing that.

So as the project's design developed, uh it came to this board uh for uh approval of the essentially a term sheet for the project agreement in late 2024, and there were two main scenarios.

One was to have uh a podium that could hold 365 units and multiple projects above the bus yard.

The other was if that never came to fruition uh for us to be able to park our paratransit fleet there.

Uh it would be a quite an expensive parking lot for our paratransit fleet, but that was a vision.

And the way the financing was structured is that the MTA would would sort of pay for the podium up front and then be funded uh for that investment in the podium by any eventual affording affordable affordable or workforce housing uh developments.

As Supervisor Walton said, and this might be a friendly amendment to the to the language, it would was workforce and affordable housing.

So about the project agreement, you know, the earlier versions of it had half of each.

Uh so I will also just emphasize and this, you know, that MOCD uh did not have the podium housing in their in its pipeline, and and but it did have the Bryant Street housing in the pipeline.

So I think what we did as an agent.

There was no funding for this.

There was no funding uh for housing above the podium.

It was a future, it was it was a future uh possibility.

Uh so I think we as an agency are have learned important lessons from this project, and we share the disappointment that members of this board uh expressed today and in committee.

We would much rather have brought a project to you that enabled the housing, uh, even if it was unlikely to come to fruition any time soon uh because of just that vision and how much need there is in the community.

We know uh we understand the displacement that's happened in this community and the need for housing.

Uh so I'm gonna try to wrap up quickly.

So in 2025, uh after that uh approval at the board, we went out to the contractor community with our development partner, uh Petrero Neighborhood Collective, which is largely plenary um the company plenary, and we saw it basically costing for the project.

And we had estimated the project at about 560 million, and the estimated cost came back uh almost 30 percent higher than that, over 700 million.

And we were faced with a decision as an agency, not podium or no podium, but really can we afford this project and allow it to move forward at all given the constraints on our budget, which I don't think I need to tell anyone in this room about.

Uh thank you for for all of your support on that front.

And uh so we had we essentially then went into a value engineering exercise to see where we could save uh money to make the project affordable, and the biggest chunk was about 70 million dollars for removing the podium.

It's not just a stronger building, it's also a deeper basement potential future egress lobby spaces for the housing.

So there's a lot of design aspects to that.

And so we do regret not going out to the community and talking to this board more at that time about the costing uh challenge of the project, but we were really in can we were in an intense negotiation with our private partner and we were trying to figure out whether we could make the project work or not.

So fast forward to last fall when we did come back to you know the community and many stakeholders including this board and describe the situation where we were in where we needed to remove the podium to make the project feasible.

We believe again that this project is a historic investment in the future of Muni and we thank the members of this board for their support of the ECER bond in June at this body.

So that really left us where we are now and you know we're for for all the disappointment we are incredibly excited about about the Muni uh facility and getting going on that we have vacated the facility and uh look forward to starting construction as soon as possible.

I think I tried to provide a quick uh narrative there but if I didn't answer any of your questions, President Mandelman or that any of the other uh supervisors well I think just say again one more time why this project is important without the housing this project is we can't run Muni service without maintaining the vehicles and we have to have modern functional yards to maintain the vehicles.

Petrero Yard is functionally obsolete and it's un it's not a good place for our our maintenance staff or others to work and so we need a new bus yard to run Muni service.

And MTA has been trying to make this project work for at least 10, but probably more like 15 or 20 years.

Yeah we say eight years but I think that that's a probably a starting point that doesn't take into account all the work that went in into the effort before that but it's been a dedicated effort and many of the of the both SFMTA staff and our partners are here in the commun are here in the room today because this is such an important milestone for the project.

Now adding 70 million dollars of cost to a project you know makes the afford there's I think a a line that is worth saying is affordable housing is not affordable to construct.

It's affordable affordable for the people who will live in it but it is equally expensive to build the podium adds makes this housing inherently harder to build much harder to build and the choice to make to not use any market rate housing in that project was not the MTAs.

I can't speak specifically to those conversations I wasn't at the MTA at the time but I think it was a conversation with you know both both community and members of this board and and those decisions you know were made and we we went forward and implementing them as best we could.

And we were certainly a part of those conversations I do not want to suggest we were not and to I mean if I have $70 million to build affordable housing building a podium is maybe not the best way to use that especially when I haven't figured out how to pay for the actual affordable housing that's going to get built but when I've talked about this with you and the director the gap here if we were to slow this down to try to save some future for housing on that on that property is not $70 million, right?

It is much, much more than that.

That is correct President Mandelman uh at this point and I do want to first just thank members of the board from what we've heard today there is not you know we are not hearing that that interest in in in stopping the project at this point we would have to if the podium was going to go back into the project we would have to go back much earlier in the design process and because the podium design did not advance as far as the design without a podium and we would have to uh go back and do that engineering work and we would also have to rebid uh redo about 60 bids for the both the the general contractor and all the subs who are prepared to get going on the project and so I think everyone here is knows that whenever you do bids uh at one point in the past and in the future they are never uh less expensive so we don't know exactly what it would be but we know it would be significantly uh more than 70 million and and our perspective is that it would lar largely kill the project but again we want to very much thank this body for appearing you know willing to move forward and supportive of the larger project despite the shared disappointment I see Supervisor Cheryl on the queue uh thank you President Middleman um I just want to make sure I understand this correctly the 70 million dollars to build the the the podium right that just makes it possible to consider building the affordable housing is that right through the chair to through the president to Supervisor Sheryl that is correct supervisor.

And then that almost strikes me as like a land acquisition cost, like a proxy for land acquisition costs.

Is that about right?

That's fair.

Is that fair to look at that way?

So at $70 million divided by 365 potential units, that's a land acquisition cost about $191,000 per unit.

What what is most CD target for their site acquisition costs on a per unit basis?

Would Most C D ever consider spending this much money per unit on site acquisition?

Through the chair to Supervisor Sheryl, MOCD is is here and I would defer to them on their how they look at land acquisition if you're interested in answering.

But my general sense for the I'd love to understand that, please.

Can someone from O C D come on it?

Good afternoon, Robert Backa, I'm the joint development director at uh Most C D.

Um so with acquisitions at 191 per unit, um, it would make any housing project um extremely difficult to finance.

Um I would have to go back and kind of look at our portfolio.

I mean, most of the sites that we acquire are through land dedications.

Occasionally, you know, we had a multi-site acquisition NOFA um a couple years ago where we actually funded acquisition of the five sites, so I could go back and get data from that, but I'm pretty certain that we have not spent 191 per unit just for land cost.

Is it safe to say that you've never spent anything close to 191,000 per unit for site equitable?

I mean, I would prefer to to confirm that and go back and uh and research that, but it would be very hard to make a project viable at that cost.

So from is it fair to say that if the MTA could come up with $70 million to essentially do a site acquisition cost for affordable housing, we might want to buy something else that's cheaper.

There's probably better value out there and just and even if there was $70 million to build the podium, um we think it would be very difficult, extremely difficult to actually fund kind of a traditional light tech project, but also the workforce housing, which the Supervisor Walton had mentioned is unsubsidized housing.

And so we think that even with the podium building with all the complex complexities of the design, the construction, the coordination with with construction, we think that it would be extremely difficult to build any housing up there even with the podium pay for.

From what I'm hearing is that if we can find $70 million, we're probably better off spending it on affordable housing elsewhere.

Like spending it to build this podium might actually reduce the amount of affordable housing we can build in San Francisco.

I'm not sure I feel comfortable urging the MTA to come up with a way to build this podium.

I would be okay.

I'd be okay urging us to do the future housing developments elsewhere.

Um I just and and and Supervisor Jane, if I'm misunderstanding, I'm okay with urging them to find up find funding to do something elsewhere.

Uh I'm not sure I'm comfortable urging them to do it here because of just that cost component might reduce the number of affordable housing units we can generate overall.

And I want to and if I'm misunderstanding the proposed amendment, I'm happy to be educated on that.

Supervisor Melgar.

Thank you, President.

I just want to point out a couple things, and that is the resolution that we're voting on is for the um new project that they have come up with.

A hundred units of affordable housing and modernization for the yard.

That is what went to the budget committee.

That's what we're voting on today.

Further, the amendments that uh our colleague Supervisor Chan has put in front of us.

What it says is the Board of Supervisors urges MOHCD, not MTA, MOCD to identify funding sources to construct the infrastructure needed to enable future housing development opportunities as part of the Petrero modernization yard.

It doesn't say in the modernization yard, or does it say uh the podium specifically?

So I think it's open enough to reassure the community that we're taking this whole promise that was made to the community seriously in that we will urge MOH TD to attempt to do this.

And so I don't think it puts any specific responsibility on this project that it cannot sustain, nor are we doing anything to uh you know uh ensure that they are you know uh money having it spending having to spend money on this very well-needed emergency project, because it is a life and safety issue at this point that they uh shouldn't be doing.

Nor does it um nor does it uh imply a delay in the project at all either.

I'm not sure, you know, where that was because I I don't I don't see a delay in this project as the language is supposed.

Thank you.

Supervisor Sherrill.

Um that all sounds great.

I I think I basically agree with everything you just said.

The um the wording that threw me off a little bit was the the and I have two different copies of things.

So again, forgive me if I'm wrong here.

There was an as provided in the entitlement legislation.

So if I'm looking at the wrong thing here.

I am.

Great.

Thank you.

Excellent.

Okay.

So I think as long as further resolved, yeah, the this as provided in the entitlement legislation, as long as we're not urging the MTA to build the podium, which I think might restrict the amount of affordable housing we could actually build in the city overall.

As long as we are maximizing the number of housing units we can build in the city overall, and we're not slowing down this project, I'm okay.

But I think we need to be really careful that we don't encourage the MDA to spend staff time doing something that is simply impossible, which I think would further mislead the community who definitely feels let down here and reasonably so.

My I guess last somewhat cranky thought on this.

Um, this board asks our city departments to do impossible things, and they are able to rise to the occasion and somehow deliver.

And sometimes we ask them to do impossible things, and we get extraordinary delay and more and more costs for projects.

And in my view, that is what has happened here, and that is the disappointment that I have.

So I, for my own vote, just for me.

I am not inclined at this point to tell either of these two is the two agencies, which I think have done their very, very best to give them more direction on uh on this particular project.

I would think they need to get uh the the rail yard or the bus yard done, and I think we need to do everything we can to find uh funding for affordable housing, but I trust that MOCD is going to be a strong partner in that.

Madam Clerk, could you please call the roll on the amendment on the proposed amendment?

On the amendment, Supervisor Mahmoud.

Mahmoud I, Supervisor Mandelman.

No.

Mandelman, no, Supervisor Melgar.

Aye.

Melgar, I, Supervisor Sauter.

Soder I, Supervisor Cheryl.

Cheryl I, Supervisor Walton.

Walton I, Supervisor Wong.

Wong I, Supervisor Chan.

Chan I, Supervisor Chin.

Chen I, and Supervisor Dorsey.

Dorsey, I.

There are nine ayes and one no with Supervisor Mandelman voting no.

And the resolution is adopted.

Mr.

President, that was that's the amendment.

That was on the amended item, please call the roll.

On item 14 as amended, Supervisor Mahmood.

Mahmoud I, Supervisor Mandelman.

I Mandelman, I, Supervisor Melgar.

Aye.

Melgar, I, Supervisor Sauter.

Sotter, I, Supervisor Cheryl.

Cheryl I, Supervisor Walton.

Walton, I, Supervisor Wong.

Wong I, Supervisor Chen.

Chen I, Supervisor Chen.

Chen I, and Supervisor Dorsey.

Dorsey I.

There are 10 ayes.

And now, uh, without objection, the resolution is adopted.

Madam Clerk, please call item 15.

Item 15, this is a resolution to approve port commission lease number L 1737 8 with Dylan Tours, a LLC for approximately 1,500 square feet on the ground floor of a two-story building located at 490 Jefferson Street for a five-year term to commence on May 1st, 2026 through April 30th, 2031, for an initial annual base rent of 72,000 with 3 percent annual increases and one five-year option to renew.

I think we can take this item, same house, same call without objection.

The resolution is adopted.

Madam Clerk, please call item 16.

Item 16, this is a motion to establish priorities for the Board of Supervisors Budget and Appropriations Committee and the process to guide the board's deliberations on the city budget for fiscal years 2026 through 27 and 2027 through 2028.

Same house, same call, without objection.

The motion is approved.

Madam Clerk, please call item 17.

Item 17.

This is a resolution to add the commemorative street name, Ed Decker Way on Oak Street between Van Ness Avenue and Franklin Street in recognition of Ed Decker's retirement from the new Conservatory Theater Center and in celebration of his founding of the organization 45 years ago.

Same house, same call, without objection, the resolution is adopted.

Madam Clerk, please call item 18.

Item 18, ordinance to amend the administrative code to require the Department of Public Works to perform evaluations and report periodically on mechanical street sweeping operations to include submittal of written performance reports to the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor to amend the health code to revise and clarify outdated terms concerning refuse receptacle requirements and to affirm the sequel determination.

Same house, same call, without objection.

The ordinance is passed on first reading.

Madam Clerk, please call item 19.

Item 19, motion to appoint Gail Renee Rosborough, term ending March 1st, 2027, and Carla Cuevas, term ending March 1st, 2029, to the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board.

Same house, same call, without objection.

The motion is approved.

Madam Clerk, let's go to our committee reports.

Please call items 20 through 37 together.

Items 20 through 37 were considered by the land use and transportation committee at a regular meeting on Monday, March 23rd.

The Chair requested that the committee send the following items as committee reports.

Items 20 through 37 are 18 resolutions considered by the Land Use and Transportation Committee at a regular meeting, which initiate landmark designations under Article 10 of the Planning Code.

For item 20 for the Century Club of California, located at 1355 Franklin Street.

For item 21, the religious school for the Congregation Emanuel L Grabhorn Press Building, located at 1335 through 1337 Sutter Street.

For item 22, the Inverness Garage, located at 1565 Bush Street.

For Item 23, the Allen Weaver Durant Smith Auto Showroom, located at 1625 Van Ness Avenue.

For Item 24, the first Church of Christ Scientists, located at 1700 Franklin Street.

For Item 25, the Golden Gate Spiritualist Church, located at 1901 Franklin Street.

For Item 26, the Pacific State's Telephone and Telegraph Company for the National Urban League, located at 2015 Steiner Street.

For Item 27, for Mr.

Cudworth's house, located at 2032 through 2040 Union Street.

Item 28, the Upper Fillmore storefronts located at 2035 through 2047 Fillmore Street.

For Item 29, for the Lincoln Grill, located at 2049 through 2051 Fillmore Street.

For Item 30, the first AME Zion Church, located at 2155 through 2159 Golden Gate Avenue.

For Item 31, for the International Institute, located at 2209 Van Ness Avenue.

For Item 32, the Presidio Theater, located at 2336 through 2346 Chestnut Street.

For Item 32 33, the Arthur Castle Home, located at 2402 Steiner Street.

Item 34 for the Hannibal Lodge number one, located at 2804 Bush Street.

For item 35 for the Bridge Theater, located at 3008 Geary Boulevard.

For item 36 for the Vogue, located at 3290 Sacramento Street.

And for Item 37, for Mills Diner, located at 3355 Geary Boulevard.

And colleagues, I think we can take these items.

Same house, same call, without objection.

The resolutions are adopted.

And with that, Madam Clerk, let's go to roll call.

First up to introduce new business is Supervisor Machmud.

Colleagues, today I am introducing a resolution in support of Senate Bill 1292 introduced by Senator Richardson from Southern California.

Curb Space Downtown in our commercial corridors is at a premium, and the demand is growing as parcel delivery, food delivery, and ride share continues to grow.

However, management of this curb demand is severely lacking.

A study in Los Angeles showed that nearly half of all loading activity was noncompliant, with many of those deliveries and drop-offs happening in travel lanes and across crosswalks.

Double parking and illegal stopping creates congested streets for drivers, slower trips for transit riders, and unsafe situations for pedestrians and cyclists.

Passenger and commercial loading zones are intended to make space at the curb for deliveries and drop-offs, but without round-the-clock enforcement, these spaces are subject to misuse.

By allowing the use of modern technology like stationary cameras and sensors, SB 1292 will enable San Francisco to tackle the issue of double parking head on by making our curb policies effective.

SB 1292 also allows for automation of access fees to loading zones, which would allow for commercial fleets, including autonomous vehicle companies to pay their fair share at high value curb space.

What's more is that the revenue that would come from enhanced curb management would also help keep Muni running.

This is legislation that will allow SFMTA to implement common sense policies that will make our streets safer, reduce congestion, and support our transit system.

Thank you, Supervisor Mochmood.

Supervisor Mandelman.

Thank you, Madam Clerk.

I got a few things today.

First, I am introducing an ordinance to allow the SFPUC to connect new electric customers more efficiently, improving the PUC's ability to serve its customers and support the city's electrification goals.

Under existing law, the SFPUC can contract with developers who are party to a development agreement with the city to install electric infrastructure that would otherwise fall on the PUC to build.

This ordinance would extend that authority to allow the PUC to contract with other customers similarly interested in developing and using P SFPUC electric infrastructure, providing the provide the cost is no greater than what the city would otherwise pay, and further provided that these parties meet city workforce and labor standards.

This change would allow the PUC to take advantage of potential efficiencies, lowering costs, speeding connection, and improving service.

Importantly, this legislation would mandate that any such arrangement be memorialized in agreement with the contracting customer that, as I said, ensures compliance with the city's standard non-discrimination language, prevailing wages, local hire, and first source hiring.

I want to thank Jeremy Spitz and his colleagues at the SFPUC for their work on the legislation, as well as my legislative aide, uh Renil B.Joy.

I am also today introducing legislation to raise the threshold for Board of Supervisors approval of grants, that is, accept and expense from 100,000 to a million dollars, or the federal single audit threshold, whichever is higher.

Grants represent between 18 and 23% of our annual city revenues, meaning our departments are managing significant grant portfolios.

But the current process to get these grants approved by the board eats up substantial set staff time for what are almost always routine approvals.

In 2024, the federal government raised its threshold for grants subject to federal audit from $750,000 to a million dollars.

San Francisco's current $100,000 threshold for board approval was set in 2012 and has not been adjusted since.

After a department successfully competes for and wins a grant, staff has to prepare the file, present the budget and finance committee, and obtain approval from the full board of supervisors.

This process, which can take weeks or months, requires significant staff time from grant managers, departmental budget staff, and board staff, and in practice, the board approves these resolutions routinely.

The complexity and timeline of this process can actually discourage departments from pursuing grants that would benefit San Franciscans.

When staff resources are limited, the administrative burden of board approval becomes a real factor in deciding whether to apply for funding.

I want to be clear about what this legislation does and does not do.

This is not about eliminating oversight, it's about right sizing it and ensuring our financial controls remain robust.

When I introduced this drafting request, I also asked the controller's office to evaluate how we could maintain strong financial controls for grants that fall below the threshold for board review.

I specifically requested recommendations for protocols and procedures that would preserve the controllers' important tracking and auditing functions.

The controller's response confirms that this increase is implementable, consistent with maintaining strong fiscal controls.

The controller's office has already begun to work on solutions, including developing a centralized workflow system to track all grant packages from submission through final approval.

Importantly, departments will still be required to submit complete grant packages to the controller's office.

The controller will still review these packages for compliance with grant standards, grantor regulations, and federal requirements, and the controller will submit uh an annual report of any grants uh that fell below the threshold for Board of Supervisors approval.

This legislation would produce tangible benefits for San Francisco.

Departments will be able to accept and begin expending grant funds more quickly, accelerating delivery of services to residents, departmental staff, controller staff, and controller staff will spend less time on routine approvals and can focus on higher value work, including enhanced monitoring of larger, more complex grants.

By reducing administrative burden, we make it more attractive for departments to pursue grant opportunities that benefit our residents.

I want to thank uh Supervisor Dorsey for his early co-sponsorship.

I also want to thank the city controller Greg Wagner and his staff for their thoughtful engagement and time on the legislation.

I want to thank Sarah Crowley and the City Attorney's Office, and I want to thank my legislative aide, Melanie Matthewson all for their work on this legislation.

Um lastly, colleagues, today I'm calling for a hearing to discuss the ongoing labor negotiations between SCIU, USWW, and various aviation service contractors at San Francisco International Airport.

The master agreement, as I think a number of you know, expired last April, and negotiations have been ongoing since then.

Workers have now been operating under an expired contract for nearly a year.

And although multi-employer contracts can take time, it has been too long for these workers.

The ongoing negotiations involve a group of contractors operating under a master agreement that includes G2, Menzies, Prime Flight, Unify, ABM, and Compass Flick.

These companies provide essential services to the airlines, and these workers clean our planes, assist passengers with disabilities, handle baggage, and keep our airport running every single day.

They are essential to the success of SFO.

SFO is an airport in one of the in one of the wealthiest regions in the world, serving millions of travelers each year's each year.

As members of the Board of Supervisors, we represent constituents who take great pride in our airport.

But we cannot take pride in airport in an airport where workers do not have the dignity and security of a fair contract.

Over the past year, uh many of us have visited SFO and spoken directly with these workers.

I've met individuals who are working multiple jobs just to make ends meet.

Contractors, airlines, airport leadership, and the union share responsibility for ensuring these negotiations move forward in good faith.

SFO has long been a leader in setting high standards for airport workers, and I know it is important to all of us that SFO continue to lead in this area.

The rest I submit.

Thank you, Mr.

President.

Supervisor Melgar.

Submit.

Thank you.

Supervisor Sauter.

Thank you.

Um colleagues, today I'm introducing resolutions to initiate 15 new historic landmarks in District 3 across Chinatown, North Beach, Knob Hill, and Union Square.

These new Article 10 historic landmark designations will bring well-deserved recognition and protection to iconic buildings across our neighborhoods, including the California Masonic Memorial Temple, Vasubio Cafe, Great China Theater, and Trans America Pyramid.

Through these landmarks, we will celebrate historic LGBTQ entertainment spaces, important Italian American heritage spaces, and iconic Chinatown buildings.

Each designation tells a story of the integrity of the building and architecture, but more importantly, how the activities inside the walls shaped help help shape the San Francisco we know today.

And if you'll excuse me, I want to give a few highlights of some of these buildings and their history.

Of our 15, a few to highlight.

First, the Chinese Telephone Exchange Building on Washington Street in Chinatown.

The exchange operated Chinatown's own telephone service, which began in 1887.

Employees handled more than 13,000 calls a day in English and five Chinese dialects.

A San Francisco examiner article from 1901 detailed the skill and memory the operators needed to work at the exchange.

That article quotes the work of the exchange would drive an American operator insane.

For an addition to the 255 numbers on the exchange, there are at least 125 telephones, which are either in Chinese lodging houses or in clubs.

The operatives have nearly 1,500 names to remember, together with their owner's place of residence.

For example, Wu Qi rings his telephone and says he wants to talk to Chung He Kin.

He gives no number, for Chung lives in some big tenement and has no telephone number.

It is the duty of the telephone operator to remember all of these names, and it is claimed he does so without effort.

Next, we have Mona's Candlelight on Broadway in North Beach.

Opened in 1934 with a tagline of where girls will be boys.

Mona's is considered by many to be the first openly lesbian nightclub in the United States.

It is just steps away from another proposed landmark, Finoccio's Club, which opened in the 1920s, starting as a prohibition era speakeasy, and would go on to become home to some of the first drag performances in the United States, inviting visitors with pamphlets reading the most interesting women are not women at all.

Next, we have the Maybeck Building on Stockton in North Beach, designed by the same architect who brought us the Palace of Fine Arts.

The Maybeck Building was built for use in 1907 as the new home of Tel High Neighborhood Center.

Tel High is San Francisco's first settlement house, a center that has advanced education, health care, and progressive causes through its 132-year history while taking care of our youth and seniors every day.

The Singchon building was a cornerstone in fighting this removal, and stand instead rebuilding Chinatown and embracing tourism as a part of this recovery.

We also have the Italian Athletic Club on Stockton Street in North Beach, a building that has truly become the heartbeat of our city's Italian American community.

Steps away from Washington Square Park, it serves as a model for 1930s Art Deco design in San Francisco.

In District 3, we're showing that we can both celebrate history and embrace today's pressing needs of more housing, better infrastructure, and economic development.

A few months ago, I helped break ground on the largest housing project in District 3 in over 20 years that will welcome families for the next generation.

And today I'm introducing these 15 new landmark designations for iconic sites in our neighborhoods.

Preservation and progress don't need to be in conflict, and in fact, District 3 proves every day that they can thrive alongside one another.

I want to thank Michelle Andrews in my office for her leadership on this effort and the planning department's dedicated team, particularly Shannon Ferguson, Alex Westhoff, and Rich Sucre.

And the rest I submit.

Thank you.

Excuse me, Sautter.

Supervisor Cheryl.

Thank you.

Uh colleagues.

Today I'm introducing an Upper Fillmore Entertainment Zone.

This entertainment zone, stretching along Fillmore between Sutter to Jackson will help activate our neighborhood, support our restaurants and bars, and perhaps most importantly, be ready in time for the Fillmore Jazz Festival this upcoming summer.

The Upper Fillmore Corridor is on the rise with many new restaurant entrepreneurs filling vacancies, the impending restoration of the Clay Theater as a neighborhood cornerstone for arts and community and more.

I look forward to thoughtfully implementing this entertainment zone to build on this momentum and enhance this vibrant merchant street.

I'm very grateful for the partnership with the Fillmore Merchants Association, especially Tim Ome and Patty Mangan, and with Supervisor Mahmood, whose district also shares this Fillmore Corridor as well.

Colleagues, thank you, and the rest I submit.

Thank you, Supervisor Sherrill.

Supervisor Walton.

Thank you so much, Madam Clerk.

Colleagues, today I want to honor the life and legacy of Jose de Jesus Garcia.

Born in Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, Mr.

Garcia was one of 15 children and learned the value of hard work early on.

At just 11 years old, with the sixth grade education, he left school to help support his family.

In the late 1970s, he made the courageous decision to come to the United States alone in pursuit of the American dream.

In San Francisco, he met the love of his life, Malia de la Cruz Garcia, and ESL classes at City College's mission campus.

Together with very limited resources, they built a life grounded in love, resilience, and determination, enduring even the hardship of renting a closet as their living space.

Through it all, Mr.

Garcia reassured his wife that their circumstances would not define their future.

He built his life through hard work and sacrifice, spending 22 years as a baker in San Rafael before later working at the St.

Regis Hotel, where he was known for his humility, generosity, and strong work ethic.

A proud naturalized U.S.

citizen, he remained dedicated to his community throughout his life.

In the early 1990s, Mr.

and Ms.

Garcia purchased a home in San Francisco's Visitation Valley, creating stability and opportunity for generations.

Their daughters, Sophia and Veronica, became first generation San Francisco natives who graduated from San Francisco State University and built meaningful careers while their four granddaughters continue to pursue their dreams in art and education.

In May of 2023, Mr.

Garcia was diagnosed with stage four gastric cancer.

Even then, he continued working through chemotherapy until retiring in March of 2024.

Guided by his deep Catholic faith, he remained strong and hopeful.

On March 16th, 2026, Jose de Jesus Garcia passed away at home, surrounded by love after fighting with strength and dignity until his final breath.

His legacy of faith, sacrifice, and love lives on through the family and community he helped build.

May he rest in eternal peace, reunited with the love of his life.

The rest I submit.

Thank you, Supervisor Walton.

Supervisor Wong.

Submit, thank you.

Supervisor Chan.

Thank you, Madam Clerk.

Colleagues, today I'm introducing a resolution to condemn the actions of the Trump administration's immigration and customs enforcement agents, ICE at our airport on Sunday evening and throughout.

We have all by now seen the violence and aggressive arrest by eyes of a woman who was with a young child at SFO.

All while bystanders took video and requested to see identification and yet still they were ignored.

Once again, we need to all understand that San Francisco is a sanctuary city, and as such, we do not, we do not, absolutely not, aid or support any immigration action by the Federal Agency in our city or on our city properties.

And thanks to Supervisor Bala Mamu, we now also have ice-free zone throughout San Francisco.

So we must once again remind our law enforcement, urging them to comply to our centuries city policy and to stand together with our immigration community.

Lastly, we are urging the United States Congress to reject any funding for ICE and instead pass the funding for the Transportation Security Administration, TSA, so they can do their jobs and get ICE out of our airports.

I want to thank Supervisor Bala Mammu, Jackie Filder, Shaman Walton, and Shyen Chen for your early co-sponsorship.

And colleagues, I look forward to having your support as well.

And the rest I submit.

Thank you, Supervisor Chan.

Supervisor Chen will submit.

Thank you.

Supervisor Dorsey.

Submit, thank you.

Mr.

President, seeing no names on the roster, that concludes the introduction of new business.

Let's go to public comment.

At this time, those of you who are still remaining in the chamber, line up on your right hand side of the chamber.

You may speak to uh items 40 through 46, the adoption without committee reference or other general matters that are not on the agenda but within the board subject matter jurisdiction.

We are setting the timer for two minutes.

We welcome our first speaker.

Come on up.

Welcome.

Quick question is it public comment, public comment, or just for those items?

This is general public comment.

Okay, cool, cool.

This week, a two-year-old child overdosed and died on fentanyl.

San Francisco.

This is not the first child who's died from fentanyl in our city, and unfortunately, it probably won't be the last.

Walking around downtown San Francisco today.

I see outside of our schools and playgrounds, our conference areas, our main corridors, just everywhere you look are the signs of the decline of Western civilization.

Fent all is a form of chemical warfare on the American people.

Comes from China, crossed the southern border into our community, big cities, and small towns.

I believe they're some of the best people in the world.

Unfortunately, there are fentanyl dealers here in our community, transnational narco-terrorists who are exploiting and taking advantage of our sanctuary city.

5,000 people of all races and religions have died from fentanyl in San Francisco between the years 2019, 2026, including many of my family and friends.

Corrupt far left Democrats such as yourselves have enabled chaos and lawlessness for financial gain via Fental through corrupt nonprofits, corrupt organizations, NGOs that benefit from the suffering of the less fortunate on the streets.

We are on the 20th year anniversary of Gavin Newsom's tenure plan to solve homelessness.

Billions of dollars had been spent only for the situation to get worse.

My apartments have been broken in several times.

I've had to fight off burglars while my girl's screaming buddy murder.

So uh Nick Shirley's coming to town next week, and uh you guys will all be under the magnifying glass.

Thank you for your comments.

Thank you.

Welcome to our next speaker.

Let's recap March and headlines.

March 5th, ousted DHS chief, no praises Lori, says he works very well with feds.

He probably doesn't want me to talk about it a lot.

We have great conversations and talk quite often.

March 6th, Bay Area mom and her two kids deported to Columbia three days after ISERS and SF, same family, deaf child, deaf California child deported without hearing aids.

Also, March 6th, Lurie's bodyguards injured during tenderloin scuffle.

The mayor was unhurt after two suspects are arrested in the tenderloin.

Also March 6.

Video shows Mayor Laurie Security shows demand to ground before fight.

March 10th, what was the sin?

asked Rep Eric Swalell decrying the deportation of six-year-old Joseph Rodriguez at a news conference outside of Hayward City Hall, March 11th.

SF judge releases man violently assaulted by Mayor Lurie Security in street fight.

The judge says Mr.

Phillips was the one who was assaulted.

March 16th, SF homeless man who brawled with Laurie Security, uh jailed again.

He's being accused of living on the sidewalk because he has no other place to go.

March 18th, deported six-year-old deaf boy could die in Colombia without medic medical attention.

His attorney says, March 19th, he's really struggling.

Advocates voice concern about deported six-year-old deaf boy.

March 23rd, ICE agent seen terrorizing woman and child at SFO.

Let's go back in time.

May 9th, 2023.

San Francisco Supervisors passed resolution resolution urging release of video in Banco Brown killing.

In 2026, could you even imagine passing a resolution urging DA Jenkins to drop the charges against Mr.

Phillips, a homeless black man just like Banco Brown?

Or a resolution urging the return of little Joseph and his family so Joseph doesn't die.

And a resolution urging the mayor to actually condemn ISIS violence against us.

I can't.

Not in this fascist serving board as a whole.

It shouldn't it be controversial to want to save a brown deaf kid's life and a homeless black man from jail and to protect us from ISIS violence.

Should be our red line.

Don't sell your soul for the sake of peace and parades and parties.

Thank you for your comments.

Welcome to our next speaker.

Hi, my name is Richard Johnson, and I'm a co-founder of HV Safe.

I want to address the role of D5 Supervisor Mahmud in what now is unfolding on Hayes Street, specifically the effort to permanently close it based on what began as a COVID era temporary program.

Recent public records show this did not originate as a neutral agency process.

It was initiated and driven from the supervisor's office, including directing the use of Octavia funds, coordinating across agencies, and planning the study before the public had any awareness of it.

At the same time, the public has been told this is simply a neutral public life study.

It is not, and that raises a serious concern, concern about overreach.

This is a transportation decision, one that should sit with SFMTA and follow a clear public process.

Instead, that effort now extends to the use of transportation funds originally intended for Octavia improvements toward a plan to permanently close a neighborhood business corridor.

That should give everyone pause because at no point was there any open discussion about reopening Hayes Street, nor was there any mean meaningful community level process to establish a mandate for a permanent closure.

California law is clear that street closures are tied to safety, access, and necessity, not preference.

What is happening here moves in the opposite direction.

It sets a dangerous precedent where a single office can direct transportation policy, redirect restricted funds, and reshut reshape a public street without a clear mandate or a transparent decision.com.

We have a thorough history and we do our due diligence of looking at the process and to hear it is a process that's at fault.

Thank you for your comments.

Welcome to our next speaker.

But I really don't have much to say today.

But I would like to suggest as a rules change that since Mondays are always uh uh seen to fall on a government holiday uh and the committee meetings at the Board of Supervisors can't meet on Mondays, and so the supervisors can't really do business on Tuesdays.

Uh so the supervisors essentially have two days off.

Uh the second day, perhaps they could have all of their commemoratives and their award meeting.

I mean, it this is turning into like uh uh the Hollywood rewards.

Anyway, that's only a suggestion, and I wanted to keep uh off top.

Thank you.

Thank you for your comments.

Welcome to our final speaker.

Well, well, a Duffy, I uh live nearby.

I had a couple of speakers that I guess were in engaging in a little bit of hyperbole there.

One of them that said your board was uh ultra fascist, and then the other one said was ultra-left wing.

Well, I'm pretty sure you're not ultra-left wing, and you know, probably not fascist either.

Uh they both made good points outside of the hyperbole part.

I I think you have to hang around for a while and see how the city works, and you start to find out that it's a kind of a complicated situation.

Thank you for your comments.

All right, Mr.

President.

All right.

Uh public comment is now closed.

Madam Clerk, please let's go to our for adoption without committee reference agenda.

Please call items 40 through 46.

Items 40 through 46 were introduced for adoption without committee reference.

A unanimous vote is required for adoption of a resolution on first reading today.

Any member may require a resolution on first reading to go to committee.

Supervisor Walton.

Okay.

Anyone else?

Uh all right.

Madam Clerk, could you call the role on the balance of the items?

On items 40, 41, 42, 45, and 46.

Supervisor Machmood.

Machmoon I, Supervisor Mandelman.

I.

Mendelman, I, Supervisor Melgar.

Melgar, I, Supervisor Sauter.

Soder, I, Supervisor Cheryl.

Cheryl I, Supervisor Walton.

Walton, I, Supervisor Wong.

Wang I, Supervisor Chen.

Chen, I, Supervisor Chen.

Chen I, and Supervisor Dorsey.

Dorsey I.

There are 10 ayes.

Without objection, the resolutions are adopted.

Madam Clerk, could you please call item 43?

Item 43.

This is a resolution to recognize March 2026 as endometriosis awareness month in the city and county, San Francisco.

Supervisor Walton.

Thank you, Mr.

President.

Colleagues, this resolution declares March as endometriosis awareness month here in San Francisco, and is personal to my office.

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition with tissue similar to the lining of the uterus, grows outside of it.

Throughout the body, it can cause incapacitating pain, infertility, organ damage, kidney failure, increased risk of cardiovascular disease, and certain cancers, and immune dysfunction.

It is not just bad or painful periods.

It is a systemic disease that can affect every part of a person's life for their entire life with no known cure.

It affects one in ten people, approximately 200 million worldwide, and 15 million in the United States alone.

It is one of the leading causes of school absences in teenagers, but despite how widespread this condition is, it receives a fraction of the federal research funding compared to other diseases.

People with endometriosis wait an average of six to ten years for a diagnosis, and some go 20 to 40 years without one.

They are dismissed by doctors, told it is just period pain, cycled through treatments that do not work or cause them serious harm, and left to navigate a medical system that was not built to take on their pain seriously.

That is especially true for black women and people of colour.

Black women are only about half as likely to be diagnosed with endometriosis as white women because of long-standing biases and medicine that consistently that consistently underestimate pain in black patients.

For black women with endo, the diagnostic delay is longer, the dismissal is sharper, and the consequences of delay care are more severe.

This is personal to my office, as we have stated in the past.

She went undiagnosed for years despite reaching out to multiple doctors and advocating for herself at every turn.

Her story is not an exception.

It is exactly what millions of people experience.

And it is why awareness and education matter so much.

Shout out to Congresswoman Nakema Williams of Georgia, who has introduced H.R.

6682, the endometriosis care act that will expand treatment and resource.

Thank you, colleagues, Supervisor Melgar, Fielder Chen, and Mandelman for your co-sponsorship.

And I want to thank my legislative aide, Natalie G for bringing awareness to this issue.

And I think we can take that item, same house, same call without objection.

The resolution is adopted.

Item 44 resolution to recognize the week of March 29th through April 5th, 2026 as community-based Doula Week in the City and County of San Francisco.

Supervisor Walton.

Thank you, Mr.

President.

Colleagues, today we are declaring March 29th to April 5th as Community Doula Week in San Francisco as part of a national effort.

Community-based doors provide continuous culturally grounded support to birthing people through one of the most physically and emotionally demanding experiences of their lives.

What makes community doolas distinct is that they share lived experience with the people they serve.

That commonality matters.

Research consistently shows it improves outcomes, particularly for black and brown mothers who face the steepest disparities in maternal health.

Here in San Francisco, those disparities are real.

Black mothers in our city experience significantly higher rates of pregnancy related complications and mortality than other races.

Community doolas are one of the most effective evidence-based tools we have to close that gap because they work alongside doctors, midwives, and nurses, providing informational and emotional support throughout labor, delivery, and the transition to parenthood.

They meet families where they are, help navigate a system that was not always built for them, and stay engaged well after birth.

As you know, the mayor, early childhood educators, Department of Status of Women, Department of Public Health, Supervisor Melgar, myself have all come together to make this a priority.

Thank you to my colleagues, Supervisor Melgar, Fielder, Chan, Cheryl, and Mandelman for your co-sponsorship and to Sister Webb for bringing this issue to our office.

Thank you.

And let's take this item, same house, same call without objection.

The resolution is adopted.

And Madam Clerk, do we have any imperative agenda items?

I have none to report.

Okay.

Um could you please read the in memoriams?

Today's meeting will be adjourned in memory of the following beloved individual on behalf of Supervisor Walton for the late Mr.

Jose de Jesús Garcia.

And I think that brings us to the end of our end of our agenda, colleagues.

Madam Clerk, do we have any further business before us today?

That concludes our business for today.

Then we are adjourned.