NewWed, Jun 24, 2026·San Francisco, California·Budget and Appropriations Committee

Recessed Budget and Appropriations Committee Hearing on Mayor's Proposed Budget - June 24, 2026

Discussion Breakdown

Public Comment29%
Community Engagement13%
Affordable Housing12%
Budget and Finance9%
Miscellaneous7%
Immigration Policy7%
Economic Development6%
Public Health4%
Procedural2%
Early Childhood Education2%
Public Education2%
Arts and Culture2%
Labor Relations2%
Homelessness1%
Public Safety1%
Engineering And Infrastructure1%

Summary

Recessed Budget and Appropriations Committee Hearing on Mayor's Proposed Budget - June 24, 2026

The committee convened a public hearing to receive testimony on the mayor's proposed budget for fiscal years 2026–2027 and 2027–2028. Chair Chan announced that the committee had rejected several Budget and Legislative Analyst (BLA) policy recommendations for the SFPUC, Treasurer/Tax Collector, City Administrator, and MOHCD, as agreed with the respective departments. The remainder of the meeting was devoted to public comment, with hundreds of speakers addressing the budget's impact on a wide range of programs and communities.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Youth and workforce development: Multiple speakers, including participants from Chinatown Alleyway Tours (CATS), SF YouthWorks, and Free City College, urged full restoration of MOHCD cuts. Speakers emphasized that CATS provides job readiness, public speaking skills, cultural preservation, and leadership development for low-income youth. SF YouthWorks speakers noted the program places 400 youth annually in paid city internships and that proposed cuts would reduce placements by 80%. Free City College supporters described the program as a lifeline for low-income, first-generation, immigrant, and re-entry students, arguing that cuts undermine access to higher education and economic mobility.
  • Housing and rental subsidies: A large number of speakers from the SRO Family United Collaborative and other tenant organizations requested long-term rental subsidies for families living in single-room occupancy (SRO) units. They argued that short-term subsidies (two- or five-year) force families back into instability, citing a federal study finding 42% of short-term subsidy recipients return to homelessness. Many shared personal stories of overcrowded, unhealthy living conditions and the need for stable, permanent housing to support children's education and health.
  • Immigrant services and legal support: Speakers from Chinese for Affirmative Action (CAA), the Arab Resource and Organizing Center (AROC), the San Francisco Immigrant Legal and Education Network (SFILEN), and others called for maintaining funding for immigrant legal services, rapid response networks, language access, and the Immigrant Parent Voting Collaborative. They highlighted increased ICE enforcement and the need for culturally competent legal representation and know-your-rights education.
  • Workers' rights and domestic workers: Members of the California Domestic Workers Coalition, Workers' Rights Community Collaborative (WRCC), and Chinese Progressive Association urged restoration of funding for wage theft enforcement, labor law co-enforcement, and domestic worker outreach. Speakers noted that these programs are the only in-language, culturally competent services for low-wage immigrant workers, and that cuts would leave workers without recourse against exploitation.
  • Health, harm reduction, and HIV services: Several speakers opposed cuts to harm reduction programs, HIV prevention services, and youth health clinics (Larkin Street Youth Clinic, Cole Street Youth Clinic). They argued that removing harm reduction tools would increase overdoses and infections, and that the city should uphold its commitment to ending HIV and transgender homelessness.
  • Aging, disability, and senior services: Representatives from Senior and Disability Action, the Coalition on Homelessness, and CACE (Coalition of Agencies Serving the Elderly) opposed proposed cuts to senior and disabled programs, calling them a matter of life and death. They noted that the 4.5 million cut to senior services represents a tiny fraction of the city budget but has devastating consequences.
  • Arts and culture: Speakers from the Chinese Culture Center, Chinatown Media and Arts Collaborative (CMAC), and the San Francisco Arts Commission Gallery urged restoration of funding for community festivals, public art, and artist workforce development, arguing that arts are essential to neighborhood vitality and economic recovery.
  • Public safety and legal systems: Multiple speakers supported funding for the Public Defender's Office, the Be the Jury program, and SF Pretrial, while opposing increased police overtime budgets. They argued that true public safety comes from investment in community-based services, not policing.
  • Other community programs: Speakers from Hospitality House, Filipino Community Center, Southeast Asian Development Center, Mission Action, La Raza Community Resource Center, and many other organizations requested restoration of cuts to case management, emergency assistance, workforce development, and culturally specific services, stating that these programs are lifelines for low-income and marginalized residents.

Key Outcomes

  • The committee voted unanimously (5-0) to recess the hearing and carry the undecided items (items 1–3, 18, 23, 24) to the June 25, 2026 meeting. No final decisions on the budget were made; the meeting was solely for public input.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning. Good morning. The meeting will come to order. Welcome to the twenty June 24, 2026. Meeting of the recessed budget and appropriations committee from June 22nd, 2026. I am Supervisor Connie Chan, Chair of the Committee. I'm joined by Vice Chair, Supervisor Matt Dorsey, and Member Supervisor Shamon Walton. Shortly by Supervisors Danny Sauter and President Rafael Mendelman. Our clerk is Brent Haliba. I would like to thank James Kawana from EsseGov TV for broadcasting this meeting. Mr. Clark, do you have any announcement? Thank you, Madam Chair. As uh we are all here to provide public comment. Just a friendly reminder to those in attendance to please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices so the members of this committee can hear your commentary. And should you have any documents to be included as part of the file? This should be submitted to myself, the clerk. And uh while not required to provide public comment, we do invite you to fill out a comment card and leave them in the boxes by the televisions. Um, if you wish for your name to be accurately recorded for the minutes, and alternatively, you may submit public comment in writing in either of the following ways. Email them to myself, the budget and appropriations committee clerk at brengt.jsf.org. If you submit public comment via email, it will be forwarded to the supervisors and also included as part of the official file. You may also send your written comments uh via US Postal Service to our office and city hall at one Dr. Carlton be good at place room 244, San Francisco, California, 94102. And thank you, Madam Chair. That concludes my announcements. Thank you. Could we um just have a minute really quick? Right. Okay, all right. Um thank you, Mr. Clerk. So for everyone, just a reminder that today we will be taking public comment on the city's budget. Actually, Madam Chair, if I may, uh to the staff, can you let the singers outside know that they're interfering with this committee being able to hear the people giving uh commentary today? Thank you much. Hey, all right. Um reminder that today we will be taking public comments on cities budget for the past two weeks. We have had budget presentations for all the departments of this city and have scrutinized their budget and have had discussion about our priorities collectively. Today is the day we hear from members of the public about their reaction to the past two weeks, as well as your priorities uh for our city budget. Policy and procedures for how the day will proceed have been posted on today's agenda, as well as on the board's budget web page. Today, each member of the public will have one minute to provide their public comment. Each person may speak only once, regardless of whether they are part of the multiple groups or speaking on behalf of any group. I also wanted to note that we are providing interpretation for Chinese, Spanish, and Filipino, um, until Tagala, uh until 6 p.m. today. If members of the public are providing their own interpreter, I would like to clarify that the individual who requires interpretation of the comments must be the one speaking. The interpreter is here to interpret the speaker's words, not to speak on their behalf or provide their own comment. The speaker must share their own statements, which then the interpreter will interpret for the benefit of the committee and the public. So can we please now have the interpreters introduce themselves and interpret those instructions? Cada persona would have solamente una vez sin importar si forma parte de varios groups or si habla in nombre de un group or persona. Los services of interpretation stand disponibles hoy astral size of the target. Gracias.