San Francisco Government Audit and Oversight Committee Regular Meeting - July 17, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
San Francisco Government Audit and Oversight Committee Regular Meeting – July 17, 2025
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors Government Audit and Oversight Committee met on Thursday, July 17, 2025, at 18:15 UTC (morning local time). The committee, chaired by Supervisor Jackie Fielder and joined by Vice Chair Janie Sauter and Supervisor Steven Sherrill, considered eleven agenda items including a contested hearing on the fiscal mismanagement of the San Francisco Parks Alliance (SFPA). The meeting lasted several hours, with extensive testimony from former SFPA officials and public comment from dozens of affected community groups.
Consent Calendar
- Item 1 – Resolution retroactively authorizing the Port of San Francisco to accept and expend a $200,000 Parking Management Capital Grant from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for multi-space pay stations (September 30, 2024 – January 29, 2027). Passed unanimously.
- Item 2 – Resolution retroactively authorizing the Director of Health to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the California Department of State Hospitals and California Mental Health Services Authority for state hospital beds, not to exceed $10 million (October 1, 2023 – June 30, 2025). Passed unanimously.
- Item 3 – Resolution authorizing solicitation of donations for cancer screening for SF Fire Department employees – continued to the call of the chair. Passed unanimously.
- Item 4 – Resolution approving the San Francisco Police Department’s 2024 Use of Equipment Policy (AB 481) annual report. Presented by Captain James Ahern; included details on 17 unmanned ground vehicles, 1 MRAP (Bearcat), 150 flashbang grenades, 63 drones, and other equipment. The department seeks to purchase a new Bearcat ($350,000) and 24 additional drones. Passed unanimously.
- Items 5–9 – Resolutions accepting the Sheriff’s Department Oversight Board’s first, second, third, fourth quarter, and annual reports for calendar year 2024. Presented by board president Julie D. Sue. Discussed limitations due to lack of an inspector general since January 2025, reliance on Department of Police Accountability, and food quality improvements in jails. Passed unanimously.
- Item 10 – Resolution designating current city officers (treasurer, controller, city attorney) to accept tobacco settlement funds, updating a 2000 resolution. Passed unanimously.
Public Comments & Testimony
- On Item 4 (Police Equipment): Anna Brady War argued that brandishing weapons constitutes use of force and should be recorded. Aronde Sterling (Bayview Hunter’s Point Coordinating Council) called for better police training and less lethal force. Alan Buradell suggested funding to help students understand compliance with officer commands.
- On Item 11 (Parks Alliance): Dozens of community members and representatives from affected park groups testified. Many reported losing thousands of dollars in restricted funds (e.g., Tompkins Stairway Garden, Tunnel Top Park, A. Philip Randolph Institute, Buena Vista Neighborhood Association, Lakeside Village, Detroit Steps Project). Speakers expressed frustration that former SFPA leaders did not notify them of the financial crisis and that funds were used for operations. The newly formed Community Partner Network (65+ groups) was highlighted as a coalition seeking restitution and a new fiscal sponsor.
Discussion Items
- Item 11 – Hearing on Allegations of Fiscal Mismanagement by the San Francisco Parks Alliance (SFPA):
- Opening Statements: Supervisor Shamann Walton led the hearing, noting that at least $3.8 million intended for community use were misappropriated. He stated that SFPA dissolved and hired Jigsaw Advisors for liquidation. The city attorney and district attorney have launched investigations.
- Testimony of Rick Hutchinson (former SFPA Treasurer, 2020–2025): Hutchinson claimed he first learned of restricted funds being used for unrestricted purposes in June 2024. He said the board immediately locked down funds and hired outside consultants (BTQ, Metis Partners). He stated that restricted funds coming in after June 2024 were preserved, but was unable to name any specific groups compensated. He estimated remaining assets at $600,000–700,000 and believed the organization owed “a couple hundred thousand” to fiscally sponsored groups, but acknowledged the deficit could be larger. He denied personal knowledge of the misuse until June 2024.
- Testimony of Drew Becker (former CEO, 2017–February 2025): Becker stated he was unaware of restricted fund misuse until May–June 2024. He blamed former CFO Justin Probert, who was fired in February 2024. Becker admitted he did not have direct access to bank accounts or the financial system. He said the organization implemented new controls (e.g., finance committee chair signed off on payments over $7,500). He claimed he informed Rec and Park Department on June 27, 2024, but did not disclose the full extent of restricted fund misuse. He said community partners were not notified because the plan was to first inform major donors to secure funding. He resigned in February 2025 after the organization’s financial situation worsened.
- Testimony of Robert Ogilvie (interim CEO, February–June 2025): Ogilvie took over after Becker’s resignation. He stated that upon joining, he learned of the true financial deficit (approximately $5.4 million owed to partners) and that restricted funds had been used for operations. He prioritized transparency, meeting with Rec and Park and the Port in April–May 2025. He said the board voted to dissolve in late May 2025 to protect remaining restricted funds. At dissolution, the organization had about $1.1 million in cash ($800,000 restricted, $300,000 unrestricted). He estimated directors and officers insurance coverage at “a few million dollars.”
- Testimony of Elaine Forbes (Port Director): Forbes confirmed that the Port had not been informed of the financial crisis until learning through the media. The Port was owed $1.54 million for Crane Cove Park improvements, which the Port had to cover from its own funds.
Key Outcomes
- Item 1 – Forwarded to full board with positive recommendation (3-0).
- Item 2 – Forwarded to full board with positive recommendation (3-0).
- Item 3 – Continued to call of the chair (3-0).
- Item 4 – Forwarded to full board with positive recommendation (3-0).
- Items 5–9 – Forwarded to full board with positive recommendation (3-0).
- Item 10 – Forwarded to full board with positive recommendation (3-0).
- Item 11 – Hearing continued to the call of the chair to allow for further testimony from city departments, Jigsaw Advisors, and other parties. The committee committed to seeking restitution for affected community groups and holding SFPA officials accountable.
- Items 12–26 – Approved as committee reports for full board consideration on July 22, 2025 (3-0).
- Items 27–31 – Approved as committee reports (3-0).
Meeting Transcript
Good morning. This meeting will now come to order. Welcome to the July 17th regular meeting of the government audit and oversight committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. I am Supervisor Jackie Fielder, Chair of the Committee, joined by Vice Chair Janie Sauter and Supervisor Steven Sherrill. Our committee clerk is Monique Creighton. Our thanks to her, as well as thanks to Eugene Labadia of SFGov TVs for staffing this meeting. Madam Clerk, do you have any announcements? Yes. Public comment will be taken on each item on this agenda. When your item of interest comes up in public comment is called, please line up to speak on your right. Alternatively, you may submit public comment in writing in either of the following ways. Email them to the government audit and oversight committee clerk at M O N I U E dot C R A Y T O N at S F G O V dot O R G. You can submit public comment via email. It will be forwarded to the supervisors and also included as part of the official file. You may also send your written comments via U.S. Postal Service Office and City Hall. Number one, Dr. Carlton B. Goodlit Place, Room 244, San Francisco, California 94102. If you have doc if you have documents you would like to be included as part of the file, please submit them to me before the end of the meeting. Please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices to prevent any interruptions to today's proceedings. Finally, items acted upon today are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors agenda of July 29th, 2025, unless otherwise stated. Thank you, Madam Clerk. Please call item one. Item one is a resolution retroactively authorizing the Port of San Francisco to accept and expend a parking management capital grant in the amount of $200,000 from Metropolitan Transportation Commission, a transportation planning, financing, and coordinating agency for the nine county San Francisco Bay Area to fund the acquisition and installation of multi-space pay stations and to authorize the Port Executive Director to enter into amendments or modifications to the agreement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the city and are necessary to effectuate the purposes of the agreement of this resolution from September 30th, 2024 through January 29th, 2027. Thank you. And now we'll hand it over to Mr. Peter Albert, Development Manager of the Port of San Francisco, who will be presenting. Mr. Robert, please go ahead. Thank you. Um Madam Clerk, may we have the slides on the screen. Good morning. Uh Chair Fielder, members of the committee, Peter Albert from the Port of San Francisco. I'm here to ask you to adopt the accept expend resolution before you for the $200,000 grant we got in 2023. And I'll walk really quickly through how we got to this point. One side. Got it. Okay, background on where we are. We have different managers that were on different sites with different management practices. There became some problems with that because of accountability, making sure we're getting great enforcement, tight revenue collection. And what we thought was we would pick the brains of some of the experts who do parking in San Francisco, the SFMTA. They actually manage our parking meters on our that are on the curb and they manage one of our lots. And in talking with them, we saw an opportunity for them to use their services, their their good record of accountability enforcement as a manager of the facilities. And so that would be something that we would reflect in an updated MOU. But what would we have to do in order to work with the MTA would be to use their facility, their parking facilities. These are the pay stations the MTA uses. And the agreement would be that we would pay out of pocket for the pay station, so we hope to put in our lot to increase accountability to get that tighter revenue collection and MTA's enforcement. That's okay that we would pay out of pocket normally. We usually make the money back in the first 18 months.
openpublica.com