OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Government Audit and Oversight Committee Meeting - June 18, 2026

Government Audit and Oversight CommitteeThursday, June 18, 2026
BodySan Francisco, California
SessionGovernment Audit and Oversight Committee
DateThursday, June 18, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:29:27
Transcript — Verbatim
0:09

Good morning.

0:10

This meeting will come to order.

0:11

Welcome to the June 18th, 2026 regular meeting of the government audit and oversight committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.

0:18

I'm Supervisor Steven Sherrill, Chair of the Committee, joined by Vice Chair Bilal Mahmood, and today by Board President Raphael Mandelman.

0:27

Committee clerk is Monique Creighton, our thanks to James Kwana of SFGov TV.

0:33

Madam Clerk, do you have any announcements?

0:36

Yes, public comment will be taken on each item on this agenda.

0:39

When your item of interest comes up and public comment is called, please line up to speak on your right.

0:44

Alternatively, you may submit public comment in writing in either of the following ways.

0:48

Email them to me, the government audit and oversight committee clerk at M O N IQE.

0:54

C-R-A-Y-T-O-N at SFGOV.org.

1:00

If you submit public comment via email will be forwarded to the supervisors and also included as part of the official file.

1:07

You may also send your written comments via U.S.

1:09

Postal Service to our office in City Hall.

1:11

Number one, Dr.

1:12

Carlton, be good lit place, room 244, San Francisco, California, 94102.

1:17

If you have documents you would like to be included as part of the official file, please submit them to me before the end of the meeting.

1:23

Please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices to prevent any interruptions to today's proceedings.

1:29

Finally, items acted upon today are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors Agenda of June 30th, 2026, unless otherwise stated.

1:39

Thank you.

1:40

Madam Clerk, can you please call item number one?

1:42

Yes, item number one is an ordinance submitting the administrative environment, health, labor, and employment park planning, police, public work, subdivision, transportation, and building inspection commission codes to modify numerous reporting requirements and procedures removing obsolete programs and requirements and other code cleanup.

2:02

Thank you, Madam Clerk.

2:05

I think we're represented, we're joined here today by representatives from Supervisor Chen's office and also by Board President Mandelman.

2:14

Welcome.

2:16

Board President Mandelman, you are the lead sponsor on this item.

2:19

The floor is yours.

2:20

Thank you.

2:21

Chair Sherrill and thank you for uh and thank you, Supervisor Mahmoud, Vice Vice Chair Mahmoud, for uh making time on your calendar in a busy month to consider this piece of legislation.

2:35

Although my name is on it and I strongly uh believe in it and support it.

2:40

Um I want to be clear that the credit for this legislation goes to our city attorney and his staff who worked uh diligently to try and um put this together.

2:49

The reason I support this uh legislation, this exercise of trying to find uh reporting requirements that are outdated or uh duplicative or no longer make sense is my observation over the time that I've been on the board of supervisors that it is the natural tendency of legislators to legislate and to add requirements, and that as that happens over time, over years and decades, uh we make it harder and harder and harder uh for government to actually deliver services because people are spending more and more time reporting on the things that government is doing and relatively uh leaving less time to actually do the work of government.

3:31

So having regular uh uh exercises in going through the things that have accreted and figuring out what is uh what is out lasted its useful life is um I think very worthwhile.

3:46

And I think that it is something that this board of supervisors should be encouraging.

3:50

Um there this legislation has been kicking around for a very long time.

3:55

Uh it was introduced by the city attorney uh just about a year ago.

4:01

Um I know they had been working on this, I assume, for many, many months before because I assume a piece of legislation like this is a big chunk of work.

4:10

Um, and uh, you know, part of that last year I think has been uh time well spent, perhaps, in that you know, we took some time to go carefully through each of the changes and figure out if there were um any of these reports that uh maybe should be salvaged.

4:25

We found one.

4:26

Um I know other offices uh have found uh some that they want to try to preserve.

4:31

I believe that uh Supervisor Chen has uh some amendments.

4:34

I have uh, you know, amendments, a few amendments as well.

4:38

Um, but on balance, and the reason I wanted to insist that this board consider this, discuss it in a committee, and ideally forward this to the full board, is I think when people take on this kind of work, we we want to encourage that and uh more of this, please.

4:55

Um the city attorney's office reviewed, I think it's something more than 500 of these reports.

5:01

Um, most of these reports will stick around even after this legislation.

5:05

I think it's 336 or some number, something like that.

5:08

Uh those reports will continue to be required and delivered, and perhaps someone will review will read them or find them useful at some point.

5:15

Um, but uh uh the if the board acts on legislation reasonably in the form of what's been introduced uh north of a hundred of these reporting requirements will go away.

5:27

And I think that will be a positive thing uh for the city and county of San Francisco.

5:33

So the amendments that I have have been circulated, just to quickly run through what uh isn't in my amendments.

5:43

Um, we did uh determine that we thought it made sense to keep the Department of Human Resources reporting requirements about filed sexual harassment claims, and so uh on pages 238 to 240.

5:57

Uh the restoration of that reporting requirement is what's in there.

6:01

Um page 34, um, there's an update to a reference of uh what uh what body receives a report because uh the um the interagency planning and implementation committee uh is one of the bodies that was eliminated in the committee streamlining ordinance.

6:20

So we have streamlining overlapping with streamlining.

6:23

Um pages 25 and then 198 through 99.

6:27

We have some cross-reference corrections on page 348.

6:31

Uh we have an update to the ordinance's effective date on page uh 349.

6:38

Um, uh there's a new section 15 explaining that the amendments incorporate changes from two ordinances the board previously passed that are shown as existing code text, um, and then there's some corrections to the long title and list of sections on the first page.

6:53

That's what's in my amendments, um, which I hope this by uh I hope uh the members of the committee will make before forwarding this to the full board.

7:03

Um I believe there is a presentation from the city attorney's office.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural███████████████████████████27%
Audit And Compliance███████████████████19%
Personnel Matters█████████████████17%
Corrections And Reentry███████████████15%
Police Oversight██████6%
Budget and Finance██████6%
Economic Development█████5%
Public Safety████4%
Procurement1%
Summary of Proceedings

Government Audit and Oversight Committee Meeting - June 18, 2026

The Government Audit and Oversight Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors met on June 18, 2026, at approximately 11:15 AM PDT. The meeting was chaired by Supervisor Steven Sherrill, with Vice Chair Bilal Mahmood and Board President Raphael Mandelman present. The committee considered five agenda items, including a large code cleanup ordinance, an update to the Fair Chance Ordinance, an annual police equipment report, a downtown benefit district ballot resolution, and a hearing on city vacancies. Additionally, four settlement items were approved en bloc.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 2 (Fair Chance Ordinance): Carla Gomez Artiaga, co-director of the Transgender District, registered support for the ordinance, noting that one in three transgender individuals face employment discrimination and the importance of protecting against criminalization for health care and expression.
  • Item 4 (Downtown Community Benefit District): Robbie Silver, executive director of the Downtown SF Partnership, spoke in support, highlighting that the petition drive garnered 43% support (exceeding the required 30%) and that the Port Commission had unanimously approved participation. He encouraged forwarding the resolution to the full board.
  • No public comment was offered on Items 1, 3, 5, or 6-9.

Discussion Items

  • Item 1: Reporting Requirements Cleanup Ordinance – President Mandelman presented the ordinance, originally drafted by the City Attorney’s office, which eliminates over 100 outdated or duplicative reporting requirements from numerous municipal codes. Andrea Bruss (City Attorney’s office) summarized five categories of changes: deletion of obsolete programs, one-time reports, outdated requirements, modifications (e.g., frequency changes), and minor cleanup. Charlie Sciamas (Supervisor Chen’s office) raised concerns about eliminating land use and housing reports, but noted collaborative amendments were crafted. Clerk of the Board Angela Calvio cautioned against combining 195 changes into a 357-page document, arguing it hinders public review. She announced a future policy requiring such omnibus legislation to be broken into digestible companion ordinances. Mandelman defended the batching approach as necessary to encourage code cleanup. The committee accepted amendments from Mandelman (e.g., keeping sexual harassment reporting) and Sherrill (restoring three planning department reports: jobs-housing fit, short-term rentals, and housing inventory). The ordinance was forwarded to the full board with a positive recommendation. Vote: 2-0.

  • Item 2: Fair Chance Ordinance Amendments – Vice Chair Mahmood introduced legislation to prevent employers and affordable housing providers from using out-of-state convictions for conduct lawful in California (abortion-related care, gender-affirming care, drag performances) in hiring or housing decisions. The amendments also strengthen penalties and due process. Director Mowgli Tibeno (Human Rights Commission) and Mahmood spoke in support, noting the ordinance responds to rising criminalization in other states and that San Francisco has seen an influx of people fleeing anti-LGBTQ+ laws. Over 400,000 transgender Americans have relocated since the 2024 election. The committee forwarded the ordinance to the full board with a positive recommendation. Vote: 2-0.

  • Item 3: SFPD Equipment Policy Annual Report (AB 481) – Carl Nasida and Captain Matt Mason presented the 2025 annual report detailing use of military-style equipment including throwbots, MRAPs, command vehicles, drones, and less-lethal munitions. Drone deployments totaled 1,122 times. Costs ranged from $1,445 for throwbots to $562,513 for drones (funded by donations). One officer-involved shooting involved a fully automatic rifle and is under investigation. No public complaints were reported. The committee forwarded the resolution to the full board with a positive recommendation. Vote: 2-0.

  • Item 4: Downtown Community Benefit District Renewal/Expansion Ballot – Jackie Hazelwood (OEWD) presented a resolution authorizing the mayor to cast affirmative ballots on behalf of the city for 16 parcels (total assessment $63,985, or 0.58% of the district). The district renewal includes the Embarcadero Plaza park area. The committee forwarded the resolution to the full board with a positive recommendation. Vote: 2-0.

  • Item 5: Vacancy, Recruitment, and Retention Hearing (AB 2561) – Gigi Whitley (DHR) presented the annual report showing a citywide vacancy rate of 4.3% (1,484 vacant FTEs) as of May 1, 2026, down from a pandemic high of 14.2%. She noted a 2.1% rate for on-budget positions. Chair Sherrill and Vice Chair Mahmood expressed confusion about the presentation of vacancy data with attrition applied, particularly regarding the Police Department’s 480 unfilled sworn officer positions being reported as 258.9 after attrition. Sherrill questioned the report’s usefulness for policy and public communication. Whitley committed to presenting data both ways in future reports. The committee voted to continue the hearing to the July 2, 2026 meeting for further clarification. Vote: 2-0.

  • Items 6-9: Settlement Resolutions and Ordinances – These four items (unlitigated claims and lawsuits) were grouped. No public comment. The committee forwarded all to the full board with a positive recommendation. Vote: 2-0.

Key Outcomes

  • Item 1: Approved amendments and forwarded ordinance to full board (2-0).
  • Item 2: Forwarded ordinance to full board with positive recommendation (2-0).
  • Item 3: Forwarded resolution to full board with positive recommendation (2-0).
  • Item 4: Forwarded resolution to full board with positive recommendation (2-0).
  • Item 5: Hearing continued to July 2, 2026 meeting (2-0). City departments directed to provide clearer vacancy data.
  • Items 6-9: Forwarded to full board en bloc with positive recommendation (2-0).

Meeting Transcript

Good morning. This meeting will come to order. Welcome to the June 18th, 2026 regular meeting of the government audit and oversight committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. I'm Supervisor Steven Sherrill, Chair of the Committee, joined by Vice Chair Bilal Mahmood, and today by Board President Raphael Mandelman. Committee clerk is Monique Creighton, our thanks to James Kwana of SFGov TV. Madam Clerk, do you have any announcements? Yes, public comment will be taken on each item on this agenda. When your item of interest comes up and public comment is called, please line up to speak on your right. Alternatively, you may submit public comment in writing in either of the following ways. Email them to me, the government audit and oversight committee clerk at M O N IQE. C-R-A-Y-T-O-N at SFGOV.org. If you submit public comment via email will be forwarded to the supervisors and also included as part of the official file. You may also send your written comments via U.S. Postal Service to our office in City Hall. Number one, Dr. Carlton, be good lit place, room 244, San Francisco, California, 94102. If you have documents you would like to be included as part of the official file, please submit them to me before the end of the meeting. Please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices to prevent any interruptions to today's proceedings. Finally, items acted upon today are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors Agenda of June 30th, 2026, unless otherwise stated. Thank you. Madam Clerk, can you please call item number one? Yes, item number one is an ordinance submitting the administrative environment, health, labor, and employment park planning, police, public work, subdivision, transportation, and building inspection commission codes to modify numerous reporting requirements and procedures removing obsolete programs and requirements and other code cleanup. Thank you, Madam Clerk. I think we're represented, we're joined here today by representatives from Supervisor Chen's office and also by Board President Mandelman. Welcome. Board President Mandelman, you are the lead sponsor on this item. The floor is yours. Thank you. Chair Sherrill and thank you for uh and thank you, Supervisor Mahmoud, Vice Vice Chair Mahmoud, for uh making time on your calendar in a busy month to consider this piece of legislation. Although my name is on it and I strongly uh believe in it and support it. Um I want to be clear that the credit for this legislation goes to our city attorney and his staff who worked uh diligently to try and um put this together. The reason I support this uh legislation, this exercise of trying to find uh reporting requirements that are outdated or uh duplicative or no longer make sense is my observation over the time that I've been on the board of supervisors that it is the natural tendency of legislators to legislate and to add requirements, and that as that happens over time, over years and decades, uh we make it harder and harder and harder uh for government to actually deliver services because people are spending more and more time reporting on the things that government is doing and relatively uh leaving less time to actually do the work of government. So having regular uh uh exercises in going through the things that have accreted and figuring out what is uh what is out lasted its useful life is um I think very worthwhile. And I think that it is something that this board of supervisors should be encouraging. Um there this legislation has been kicking around for a very long time. Uh it was introduced by the city attorney uh just about a year ago. Um I know they had been working on this, I assume, for many, many months before because I assume a piece of legislation like this is a big chunk of work. Um, and uh, you know, part of that last year I think has been uh time well spent, perhaps, in that you know, we took some time to go carefully through each of the changes and figure out if there were um any of these reports that uh maybe should be salvaged. We found one. Um I know other offices uh have found uh some that they want to try to preserve. I believe that uh Supervisor Chen has uh some amendments. I have uh, you know, amendments, a few amendments as well. Um, but on balance, and the reason I wanted to insist that this board consider this, discuss it in a committee, and ideally forward this to the full board, is I think when people take on this kind of work, we we want to encourage that and uh more of this, please. Um the city attorney's office reviewed, I think it's something more than 500 of these reports. Um, most of these reports will stick around even after this legislation. I think it's 336 or some number, something like that. Uh those reports will continue to be required and delivered, and perhaps someone will review will read them or find them useful at some point. Um, but uh uh the if the board acts on legislation reasonably in the form of what's been introduced uh north of a hundred of these reporting requirements will go away. And I think that will be a positive thing uh for the city and county of San Francisco. So the amendments that I have have been circulated, just to quickly run through what uh isn't in my amendments.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com