Mon, Nov 10, 2025·San Francisco, California·Public Utilities Commission

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Meeting Summary (2025-11-10)

Discussion Breakdown

Engineering And Infrastructure47%
Personnel Matters40%
Procedural9%
Community Engagement4%

Summary

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Meeting (2025-11-10)

The Commission met with a quorum (President Arce, Commissioners Stacey and Thurlow present; Vice President Leverone absent; Commissioner Jamdar arrived during the meeting). The meeting included approval of prior minutes, extensive public comment focused on allegations of retaliation/corruption involving specific SFPUC employees, and multiple wastewater capital contract actions primarily driven by PG&E wholesale distribution tariff compliance and schedule/cost contingency needs. Commissioners also discussed receiving communications, including interest in a future hearing on the multi-enterprise climate program update.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the Consent Calendar (six items) on a 4-0 vote (Leverone absent).
  • Commissioner Stacey asked clarifying questions about:
    • Item 6C (construction staff augmentation services contract extension/increase) and its relationship to Item 9 (Anvil Builders time extension).
    • Item 6F (described as an interim improvement)—staff explained it extends pump and concrete structure life for ~15 years while a future booster station replacement is developed under the long-term capital plan.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Francisco Da Costa (Environmental Justice Advocacy): Alleged “corruption” and improper actions against employee Joe King; urged the matter be taken to civil service and reviewed.
  • Joyce Uleo: Said the matter reflects retaliation/corruption and unfair treatment; expressed the position that Joe King was targeted after raising safety/overtime/discrimination concerns; requested fair treatment.
  • Melanie Ulite Sophie: Spoke in support of Joseph King and Conrad Valencia King; expressed the position that they were treated with bias/retaliation and sought “justice” and restoration of fairness.
  • Sonia King (wife/mother): Requested investigation and accountability; described emotional/health/financial impacts on the family; urged the Commission to “make things right.”
  • Krishna Cerratos (on behalf of Adolfo Padilla/Badilla): Alleged entrenched corruption, nepotism, favoritism, and discrimination; stated protocols for dismissal/layoff were not followed.
  • Alexandra: Expressed support for Adolfo and the King family; alleged abuse of power and loss of “lawful rights”; urged restoration/fairness.
  • Adolfo Padilla: Alleged unequal power structures and lack of transparency/accountability; expressed the position that raising concerns leads to retaliation; criticized management culture.
  • Sweetie Tagata (SALT Organization): Expressed solidarity with Joe and Conrad King and Adolfo; urged the Commission to “look into” alleged wrongful terminations; referenced Pacific Islander marginalization (including a statement that Pacific Islanders make up “73% of people that they live in low-income housing”).
  • Mr. Miao: Read from Romans 13 and urged the Commission to “do the right thing.”
  • Steve Zeltzer (United Front Committee for a Labor Party): Alleged a “racist frame-up,” lack of union and Commission accountability, and demanded an investigation and reinstatement.
  • Remote callers:
    • Peter Drekmeier (Policy Director, Yosemite Rivers Alliance): Supported prior speakers’ corruption concerns; urged Commission leadership and requested a workshop on the Tuolumne River Voluntary Agreement, including analysis of whether SFPUC can meet Bay-Delta Plan flow requirements without risking water supply.
    • Shannon Hezitake: Offered character testimony in support of Joe King.
    • Mary London: Offered character testimony in support of Joe King and Conrad King; requested investigation and said they are seeking their jobs back.
  • Consent Calendar public comment: Francisco Da Costa praised a staff project manager’s work ethic and again alleged corruption/managerial harm to workers.

Discussion Items

  • Item 3 – Minutes (Oct. 28, 2025): Approved 4-0 (Leverone absent).
  • Item 5 – General Manager report: No report.
  • Item 7 – Southeast Water Pollution Control Plant Power Feed & Primary Switchgear Upgrades (Contract WW-662R, Blocka Construction)
    • Approved +$1.5M cost contingency and +360 calendar days duration contingency.
    • Staff stated the need was driven by new PG&E regulatory/tariff requirements (including an “interrupter mechanism” and revised studies/relay settings and retesting).
    • Commissioners asked for clarification on the PG&E requirement; staff emphasized it was new/unanticipated.
  • Item 8 – Oceanside WPCP Digester Gas Utilization Upgrades (Contract WW-639, Monterey Mechanical)
    • Approved +$8M cost contingency and +638 calendar days duration contingency to cover PG&E services/engineering and additional electrical infrastructure for PG&E wholesale distribution tariff compliance.
    • Staff described Oceanside producing ~400,000 cubic feet of biogas per day, and stated PG&E natural gas costs at Oceanside are ~$40,000 per month.
    • The Commission noted a resolution edit correcting the “third whereas” paragraph’s statement of original contract duration; staff clarified the requested action remained +638 days, with total duration reflected in the resolution.
  • Item 9 – Westside Reliability Improvements (Contract WW-645R, Anvil Builders)
    • Approved +602 calendar days duration contingency.
    • Staff reported project ~65% complete, with remaining work including knife gate structure/mechanical equipment, electrical equipment installation, underground utility work, and landscaping; noted public art installations were completed.
  • Item 10 – North Shore Pump Station Wet Weather Improvements (Contract WW-685R, Western Water Constructors)
    • Accepted completed work, approved Modification No. 19 adding +249 calendar days, and authorized final payment.
    • Staff stated the project met a Commission level-of-service objective for reliability and redundancy at a 150 MGD wet weather facility.
  • Item 11 – Communications
    • Commissioner Stacey praised the annual multi-enterprise climate program update and requested a future hearing/presentation to discuss progress and improvements.
    • Commissioner Jamdar echoed interest, citing specific interest in SB 1221 and CAP updates.
    • President Arce stated he found compelling a PUC Citizens Advisory Committee letter opposing some streamlining task force recommendations and opposing term limits for that body (citing expertise and institutional knowledge).
  • Item 12 – Items initiated by commissioners (discussion only)
    • Commissioner Stacey reiterated the request for a hearing on the climate program update (anticipated after the turn of the year).

Key Outcomes

  • Minutes approved (Item 3): 4-0 (Leverone absent).
  • Consent Calendar approved (Item 6): 4-0 (Leverone absent).
  • Contract WW-662R (Item 7): Approved +$1.5M and +360 days; 4-0.
  • Contract WW-639 (Item 8): Approved +$8M and +638 days; approved the corrected resolution language; 4-0.
  • Contract WW-645R (Item 9): Approved +602 days; 4-0.
  • Contract WW-685R (Item 10): Accepted work, approved +249 days (Mod. 19), and authorized final payment; 4-0.
  • Future agenda direction: Commissioners requested a future hearing/presentation on the multi-enterprise climate program update (timing discussed as after year-end).
  • Adjournment: 2:36 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

Meeting of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission will come to order. Ms. Lanier, can we please have roll call? President Arce. Here. Vice President Leverone. Absent. Commissioner Jamdar. Absent. Commissioner Stacey. Here. Commissioner Thurlow. Here. You have a quorum. Thank you, Ms. Lanier. Before calling the first item, I'd like to announce that the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission acknowledges that it owns and are stewards of the unceded lands located within the ethnohistoric territory of the Moekmaalone tribe and other familial descendants of the historic federally recognized Mission San Jose Verona Band of Alamina County. The SFPC also recognizes that every citizen residing within the Greater Bay Area has and continues to benefit from the use and occupation of the Moequa Loney tribe's aboriginal lands since before and after the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission's founding in 1932. It is vitally important that we not only recognize the history of the tribal lands on which we reside, but also we acknowledge and honor the fact that the Moekma Loney people have established a working partnership with the SFPUC and are productive and flourishing members within the many greater San Francisco Bay Area communities today. Item three, approval of the minutes of October 28th, 2025. Colleagues, are there any corrections to the minutes of October 28th? Ms. Lanier, can we open public comment? Remote callers, please raise your hand if you wish to provide comment on item three. Are there any members of the public present who wish to comment on this item? Item three. This item is for the minutes. The what? The minutes. The minutes. Yes. The minutes of our October 28th meeting. Thank you. Are there any public comment speakers for the item, which is approval of the minutes of October 28th? Do we have anyone appearing remotely, Ms. Lanier? Moderator, do we have any people with their hand raised? There is no of all callers for the title. Thank you. Ms. Lanier, can we please reflect that Commissioner Avni Jamdar has arrived? And can I also get a motion to approve the minutes of October 28th? Move to approve. Sir Second. Seconded. Second by Commissioner Jamdar. Can we have a roll call, Ms. Lanier? President Arcee. Aye.