San José CED Committee Meeting: Housing Balance and Moderate-Income Strategy Reports - May 19, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
San José CED Committee Meeting: Housing Balance and Moderate-Income Strategy Reports - May 19, 2025
The Community and Economic Development Committee (CED) of the City of San José held a special meeting on May 19, 2025, at 1:30 PM. The committee reviewed the work plan, deferring two items to June 16, 2025, and then received and discussed two major reports: the Housing Balance Status Report and the Moderate-Income Housing Strategy Status Report. Both reports were accepted by motion.
Consent Calendar
- No consent calendar items were presented.
Public Comments & Testimony
- No members of the public spoke during the meeting or the Open Forum.
Discussion Items
- Housing Balance Status Report – Presented by Eric Sullivan, Housing Department. The report analyzed San José's multifamily rental housing stock: 37% market rate units, 40% rent-stabilized (Apartment Rent Ordinance), and 23% income-restricted units. Multifamily represents about 17-18% of the city's total 340,000 housing units. Key findings: zero market rate multifamily starts in 2024, but over 2,000 affordable units under construction across 13 projects; preservation of 285 units through indirect means; and 1,194 affordable units (16 developments) could lose affordability restrictions if no action is taken. Councilmember Ortiz questioned preservation strategies; Sullivan described indirect tools such as loan modifications and capping rent increases during refinancing. Councilmember Casey referenced a Mercury News article about Bay Area vacancies; Sullivan noted San Jose has lower vacancy rates (Class A at 6% trending down, Class C at 4% trending down) compared to Oakland, and emphasized the need for increased production across the continuum. Councilmember Kamei raised concerns about aging housing in District 1 and the lack of condo development for entry-level homeownership; Sullivan identified construction defect liability reform as a necessary step to revive condo production.
- Moderate-Income Housing Strategy Status Report – Presented by Eric Sullivan and Jared Ferguson (Planning, Building and Code Enforcement). Middle income is defined as 81-120% of Area Median Income (AMI); for a family of four, 100% AMI is now $195,000/year. The city needs approximately 10,000 additional moderate-income units by 2031. About 59,000 households fall into this category, and 20% are cost-burdened. Challenges include zero market rate starts in 2024, high development costs, limited public subsidies, and high homeownership costs (single-family median over $1.6 million). Proposed strategies include updating the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (IHO), ADU incentives, construction defect liability reform, and regulatory changes to encourage missing middle housing types. Councilmember Mulcahy asked about integration with the General Plan update; staff confirmed cross-departmental collaboration. Chair Foley emphasized the need for zoning flexibility to allow lower-density development (e.g., townhomes, condos) in appropriate areas. Councilmember Kamei supported pilot programs for missing middle housing in areas without high transit.
Key Outcomes
- The committee approved deferral of two agenda items (Cost of Special Events Audit Report and Housing Stabilization and Eviction Prevention Status Report) to the June 16, 2025 CED meeting, pending approval by the Rules & Open Government Committee.
- Motion to accept the Housing Balance Status Report carried unanimously.
- Motion to accept the Moderate-Income Housing Strategy Status Report carried unanimously.
- The meeting adjourned with no further business.
Meeting Transcript
Present here. Here. Great. We need to review the work plan. A couple of items will be postponed till June 16th. We need a motion to do so. I see no one in the audience to make public comment, and I'm assuming that's the case. I see some staff people over here, but no one here. So does anyone care to make a motion to move? Move these items. Great. Thank you. Let's vote on the work plan. Great. Thank you. We have no consent calendar. The first report is a housing balance status report. And I know that Eric Sullivan has both of our reports. So take it away. Okay, great. Thank you. Thank you, Councilmember. Is the housing balance report. So as part of the housing element, we looked at where within the context of the entire housing portfolio, where does it fit our work around multifamily rental housing specifically? And then as I'll talk through at the end here some of the challenges we have and how we're going to be addressing them and getting to broader data to ensure that our housing balance report in fact covers the entire housing portfolio and housing stock within the city. And so I'll go through a couple of quick slides here, then we can open up into presentation as following this is a conversation regarding our middle income strategy as well. So first and foremost here. Oh, that's the second presentation. Can we go back to the first one? Okay. So in this presentation here, we will cover first what is the context of this report. So it's an analysis of our existing multifamily rental housing stock, looking at both our subsidized uh rent subsidized units, which are units that have uh vouchers on it typically in order to subsidize the cost of the rent. Two are income restricted units, which are units that have a cap on the incomes that are eligible to join the unit. So think of it as our low-income housing tax credit units, and then three are market rate units, because as you'll see further on down the slide, to look at the impact of our multifamily rental housing stock, we have to look at all three sides of this to get a comprehensive picture as to the balance of the entire housing stock. And then we looked at sort of location unit types and affordability levels, and we'll go through some analysis of that as well throughout this presentation. And then looking forward, what are some of some particular strategies that we're gonna look to identify in order to improve the entire data outlook we can have in understanding the challenges in this market? Yeah. So first kind of place set as you've seen this uh slide many times before. We're looking at our housing stock within the green arrows. So those where we look at preservation of some of our units at affordability and then looking at the entire affordability scale from PSH units through to home ownership, as within the multifamily rental space. We also looked at some components of homeownership as we attempted to include some of that data, but realizing going through the data analysis, we don't have a sufficient data set on the homeownership side. So it's one of the challenges that we'll look to fill in in terms of a data gap. But this is the segments of the housing criteria that we are looking at as for the purposes of this report. So here's a quick snapshot as to where the rental segment types are. So first, as you'll see, about 37% are just shy of 40% is our market rate multifamily units, then our rent stabilized units or those units subject to the apartment rent ordinance, which the housing department manages about 40% of that overall housing stock. Then the income restricted units, which are units typically tied to low-income housing tax credits that we've produced over the last two decades or more is about 23% of that overall housing stock. And so you can see the bifurcations of how this housing stock is set up. And then within the global housing stock, right? So when we look at the totality of the 340,000 or so units within the city of both single family, multifamily restricted, affordable homeownership, overall, the multifamily segment represents about 17%, almost 18% of that total amount of housing units within the city. So then here's a quick breakdown based on council district, noting our three primary blocks market rate units, uh apartment rent ordinance, therefore uh restricted units, and then our restricted affordable units.
openpublica.com