Wed, Oct 1, 2025·San Jose, California·City Council

Rules Committee Reviews Investment Divestment and Immigrant Support Plan - October 1, 2025

Discussion Breakdown

Municipal Finance34%
Community Engagement29%
Public Safety21%
Procedural16%

Summary

Rules Committee Meeting - October 1, 2025

The Rules and Open Government Committee convened to review the agenda for the upcoming City Council meeting and take action on two major proposals concerning the city's investment policy and a coordinated plan to support the immigrant community in response to increased federal enforcement activity.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the consent calendar for the October 7th City Council meeting, which included a master service agreement for citywide planning consulting services.

Public Comments & Testimony

On Investment Policy Item:

  • Jeremy Bruce (Amigos de Guadalupe), Shannon Zang (Silicon Valley Council of Nonprofits), Lucilla (Working Partnerships USA), Anzi Schaefer (San Jose Against War), Lawrence, Akemi Flynn (IPEN), Mr. Mendoza Guadalupe, and Kimberly Wu (SIREN) all urged the committee to direct staff to analyze divesting from corporations that contract with or profit from ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement).
  • Speakers expressed that divestment aligns with the city's values, protects immigrant families, and that reinvested funds should support community programs for education, housing, and healthcare.

On Immigrant Support Plan Item:

  • The same group of speakers, plus Ms. Rain (Amigos de Guadalupe), strongly supported the memo directing the city to create a comprehensive action plan with Santa Clara County.
  • Positions included calls for protecting data privacy (specifically regarding automatic license plate readers), ensuring safety at large public events like the Super Bowl, and expanding employer education to prevent workplace immigration arrests.

Discussion Items

  • Councilmember Duane questioned if there was a regular process to evaluate the city's investment strategy against social responsibility policies. Finance Director Maria Obert explained the existing social responsibility clause in the investment policy.
  • Councilmember Candelas thanked Councilmember Ortiz and the public for their advocacy on the investment item.
  • Councilmember Ortiz and Candelas introduced the memo on the immigrant support plan, explaining it aimed to fill gaps in community preparedness, coordinate with the county, address data privacy concerns, and ensure safety at major public gatherings.
  • Vice Mayor Foley and others acknowledged the existing work by city staff and the need for better public communication and coordination.

Key Outcomes

  • Investment Policy Analysis: The committee voted 4-0 to direct city staff to report on the trade-offs of divesting from corporations that contract with ICE and reinvesting in community programs.
  • Immigrant Support Plan: The committee voted 4-0 to direct the City Manager's office to partner with Santa Clara County to prepare a comprehensive plan of action to support the immigrant community.

Meeting Transcript

Today's meeting of the rules and open government committee to order, and we'll start with roll call, please. Candelas. Here. Duan. Foley here. Can we absent? Cohen. Here. We have a quorum. Thank you. The first item is our second review of the agenda for next Tuesday, October 7th council meeting. It's a 9 30 closed session and 1 30 regular session. The consent calendar starts on page five and continues on pages six, seven, and eight. Oh, sorry. Um section three. We have just one item that's not recommended for deferral, which is item 3.4, a um master service agreement for consulting services for citywide planning activities. And that's it. There's an ad sheet as well, and we'll go to public comment if there is any. No public comment. All right, back to the committee. Move for approval with the ad sheet. Okay. I have questions. Oh, I'd say I didn't notice the I didn't notice your. I didn't notice that I, I mean, officially I had my hand raised. I know. I don't normally do. I normally just say, hey, I want to say something. That's why I was sitting. I know, I know. Um Lee, uh I'm curious. There's not a lot on this agenda. There's several close uh um consent items, but has there ever been a opportunity for us to cancel a city council meeting and put everything on to the next council meeting? I mean, it's this agenda is gonna, I'm not gonna jinx it and say when I think the meeting will end, but there's not a lot here because a couple of the items were pulled, and the one that isn't consent isn't probably a controversial item. So is there anything here that's time sensitive? There are a few consent items and then the planning services is something that would be good, would be good to be heard this week. If we had a meeting the following week, we could possibly defer a week, but we actually don't have a meeting on the 14th. So our goal is to have you out early, which is something that used to happen quite regularly. Um around some of these smaller agendas. Okay, well, I will just say getting out early depends on the council to commit to that as well. Uh, but I I appreciate that response. Thank you. We'll second the motion. All right, we had a motion, now a second, and let's vote. All right, motion carries four zero. And we do not have a meeting meeting on the 14th, so we don't have to review that agenda, and we're gonna move on to our consent calendar where we have four items. Any public comment? No public comment. Okay, back to the committee for consent. All right, let's vote on consent.