Wed, Dec 10, 2025·San Jose, California·City Council

San Jose–Santa Clara County Joint Committee Meeting on Youth Master Plan & Health Data (2025-12-10)

Discussion Breakdown

Child Care54%
Community Engagement25%
Public Safety9%
Procedural5%
Parks and Recreation2%
Municipal Finance2%
Transportation Safety1%
Technology and Innovation1%
Homelessness1%

Summary

San Jose–Santa Clara County Joint Committee Meeting on Youth Master Plan & Health Data (2025-12-10)

The City of San José Neighborhood Services & Education Committee and the County of Santa Clara Children, Seniors & Families Committee held a special joint meeting focused on (1) implementation of San José’s Children and Youth Services Master Plan through two neighborhood “demonstration sites,” and (2) findings and implications from the County’s Latino Health Assessment and the Cost of Gun Violence study. Presentations emphasized a “no wrong door” system-of-care model, city–county alignment, evaluation/data integration, and prevention efforts tied to youth well-being, safety, and long-term economic mobility.

Discussion Items

  • Children & Youth Services Master Plan (City) — framework and pilot implementation

    • Angel Rios (City, administration) framed the Master Plan as a long-term, systemic effort to disrupt poverty by expanding access to opportunity, unifying city/county/nonprofit visions, and using community-informed design.
    • Israel Kanhura (City PRNS) presented the Master Plan’s seven priority areas: early learning/child care; health & mental wellness; housing access/security; learning & empowerment; meaningful/sustaining jobs; safe/clean/connected communities; and system transformation. He described two demonstration sites: Mayfair/PoCo Way and Santee/Seven Trees.
    • Funding/structure: City and County each contributed $1 million for the pilots (through Dec. 2026), with partners also leveraging grants/philanthropy. The model tests full coordination in pilot neighborhoods before broader expansion.
  • Demonstration Site: Mayfair/PoCo Way (Cisepuede Collective)

    • Veronica Gowie (Grail Family Services) & Saul Ramos (Somos Mayfair) described a community-centered “no wrong door” approach where families can enter through multiple trusted points but receive coordinated navigation and case management.
    • Pilot scope: aiming to reach 100 families in the first phase; team includes navigators, parent service coordinators, and caseworkers; working with the County to co-locate caseworkers.
    • Data/evaluation: using Salesforce and the City’s referral platform; tracking “warm handoffs,” family-defined goals and feedback, and timeliness of barrier resolution.
    • Facility: planned operations from the Capitol Park Neighborhood Center (city-owned), with anticipated move-in early March; implementation contract start noted as January 2026, with early referrals already being tested for process improvement.
    • Speaker positions: Ramos emphasized youth voice at the center of policy/practice decisions and building leadership/economic pathways.
  • Demonstration Site: Santee/Seven Trees (Catholic Charities / Franklin McKinley Children’s Initiative)

    • Carmina Valdivia (Catholic Charities) presented the initiative’s trauma-informed, neighborhood-focused model and three community-created priority areas: community schools, safe/strong neighborhoods, and economic development.
    • Provided implementation timeline phases (planning/ramp-up; initial implementation; data collection/evaluation; impact sharing; sustainability/continuous improvement; and scaling).
    • Reported highlights including:
      • Seven Trees “Trunk or Treat”: 1,000 attendees (350 adults; 500 youth age 12 and under; 150 teens/young adults).
      • Summer programming: 333 unduplicated adults and 453 unduplicated youth.
      • Community schools services (multiple elementary sites): 19 referrals, 51 wellness center activities, 3 parent engagement sessions, 12 outreach events.
      • Children’s savings/CalKIDS-related figures (as stated): 933 scholarships claimed as of June, increasing to 1,402 by September; “College and My Future” nearly 3,000 students with almost $200,000 on deposit.
      • Noted: “around 80% of children under age three are taking care in an unlicensed facility” (context: importance of supporting family/friend/neighbor care).
      • Survey findings included: 86% would recommend the event; 73% expressed interest in volunteering; 83% would participate in future activities; 83% would report a crime; 84% would go to a family/community center; 79% would ask a neighbor for help.
  • County Services Alignment: Family First Community Pathway / No Wrong Door model (County SSA)

    • Sarah Duffy (County Social Services Agency) explained the county’s “no wrong door” model and the Family First Prevention Services funding framework.
    • Priority populations for prevention services (as stated): families/youth struggling with substance abuse; pregnant/parenting foster youth; homeless youth/families; families struggling with domestic violence.
    • Described steps including intake/assessment, Title IV‑E candidacy determination, prevention plan, case management, service delivery with model fidelity, and safety monitoring/mandated reporter protocols.
  • Latino Health Assessment & Cost of Gun Violence Study (County Public Health)

    • Dr. Sarah Redman (County Public Health Officer/Director) summarized key findings and recommendations, emphasizing place-based disparities (particularly East San José and South County) and the need to dismantle systemic barriers.
    • Youth and equity indicators highlighted included:
      • Latinos are 34% of children and youth under age 25 countywide.
      • Disability/IEP data: the assessment cited less than 4% of Latino children experiencing disabilities (census-based), while later data showed 10% and in one case as high as 17% of Latino youth have an IEP.
      • 37% of Latino high school students reported feeling depressed in the past 12 months (stated as more than any other breakout group and more than county overall).
      • Latino children represented 70% of juvenile justice cases.
      • East San José had lower reported adult feelings of safety and “almost double the density of tobacco retailers” and a “huge increase in alcohol retailers” compared to other areas.
    • Gun violence cost findings included:
      • Total estimated cost: “almost $1.2 billion” for Santa Clara County; “over a billion dollars” for San José.
      • Cost per capita: “almost double” for a San José resident compared to the county overall.
    • Recommendations emphasized community-centered, youth-focused, place-based prevention and interagency collaboration.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Carla Torres (NAACP and La Raza Roundtable) expressed support for youth programs and services, urged using the Latino Health Assessment as a “driving force,” and stated a position against further criminalizing youth, emphasizing disruption of the school-to-prison pipeline.
  • Lillian Koenig (substitute teacher, resident) raised concerns about school closures and transportation barriers increasing absenteeism and affecting cultural/community cohesion; noted free transit proposals did not materialize due to funding.
  • Laura Buzzo (former city employee; master plan lead writer) stated that both the Master Plan and Latino Health Assessment show persistent disparities; expressed a position supporting system transformation (breaking silos/policy barriers) and continued centering of youth voice, especially amid federal rhetoric/policies affecting immigrant and low-income communities.
  • Neha Pradeep Kumar (Vice Chair, San José Youth Commission, D2) emphasized youth experience behind the data; cited Youth Commission survey results where violence/safety ranked #1 concern, followed by poverty/housing/homelessness; urged centering youth voice in implementation.
  • Blair Beekman (public speaker) urged tech accountability and transparent public participation in data/surveillance decisions; linked this to community safety and youth trust.
  • Lori Ketcher (SURJ/SURGE) expressed support for the memos and raised concern that vehicle towing/registration enforcement policies may further harm unsheltered families and effectively criminalize poverty.
  • Jennifer Kelleher-Cloyde (Executive Director, First 5 Santa Clara County) stated support for the plans and urged increased implementation investment; noted First 5 as a long-term funder of family resource centers and expressed concern about declining Proposition 10 tobacco-tax revenue.
  • John Horner (Board President, Morgan Hill USD) emphasized schools as key partners for scale; shared district context (over 40% free/reduced lunch, over 40% Latino, over 11% IEP) and urged scaling youth diversion.
  • Maria Fuentes (San José–Evergreen Community College District Board) expressed opposition to the school-to-prison pipeline and urged deeper cross-institution coordination and referrals into education pathways.
  • Adam Ibarra (Tenacious Group Executive Director) supported the Master Plan and urged maintaining rigorous educational standards; raised concern that many students lack internet at home.
  • Olivia Navarro (Somos Mayfair) expressed support for the City–County collaboration and using Latino Health Assessment data to guide neighborhood investments; underscored that intentional youth investment changes trajectories.
  • Gabby Chavez-Lopez (Latina Coalition of Silicon Valley) supported the Latino Health Assessment and youth/family focus; emphasized centering parents/caretakers, especially mothers, and family economic stability.

Key Outcomes

  • County committee action (CSFC): Supervisor Sylvia Arenas moved a memo/directive including (as summarized in-meeting) expanding/prioritizing pilot locations aligned with the Master Plan and Latino Health Assessment; identifying gaps; bimonthly verbal reports; follow-up meetings; CSFC reporting; and a Latino Health Assessment Action Plan project list by jurisdiction.

    • Vote (County CSFC): Young: Yes; Arenas: Yes (motion passed).
    • Friendly amendment discussion: Supervisor Betty Young emphasized aligning city/county outcomes, including shared evaluation/data outcomes.
  • City committee action (NSE Committee): Councilmember Pamela Campos moved approval of her memo with amendments to:

    • hold annual joint City–County committee meetings (NSE + CSFC), and
    • include aligned outcomes in Q1 related to data/evaluation.
    • Vote (City NSE): Campos: Yes; Candelas: Yes; Cohen: Yes; Duan: Yes; Ortiz: Yes (motion passed 5–0).
  • Implementation direction affirmed: City staff stated support for annual joint sessions; continued city-manager oversight for alignment across departments; ongoing city–county coordination meetings; pursuit of data-sharing solutions; and exploration of CalAIM/Medi-Cal eligibility infrastructure (city participation in the CalAIM coalition noted by PRNS).

Meeting Transcript

All right. Hello, everyone. Welcome. Before we begin, I want to remind the committee members and members of the public to follow our code of conduct at meetings. This includes only commenting on the specific agenda item and addressing the entire body. Public speakers will not engage in a conversation with the chair, council members, or staff. All members of the committee, staff, and the public are expected to refrain from abusive language. Failure to comply with the code of conduct, which will disturb, disrupt, or impede the orderly conduct of this meeting, will result in removal from the meeting. Please note that members of the public can comment on agendized items, but given that this is a special meeting, there will be no open forum. This joint meeting in the Neighborhood Services and Education Committee and the County of Santa Clara Children's Seniors and Families Committee will now come to order. Can the clerk please call the roll? Campos? Present. Candelas? Here. Cohen? Here. Vice Chair Duan? Here. And Chair Ortiz? Present. You have a quorum for the city. Thank you so much. Now I'm going to pass it to my colleague, Silvia Vrenes, from the county. Wonderful. Well, good morning everyone. I'm Sylvia Rines, Chair of CSFC on the county side, and so I'm gonna ask our clerk to please call roles so that we can meet quorum. Vice Chairperson Young? Here. And Chairperson Rines. And I'm here too. Thank you, you have a quorum. We need it. Great, thank you so much. Coordination between the City of San Jose and the County of Santa Clara on the City of San Jose Children and Youth Master Plan. And the County of Santa Clara County's Latino health assessment and gun violence prevention efforts are very important to the discussion. It impacts all of us together. I'm really grateful to have the opportunity to work with my colleagues from the county. You know, at the end of the day, we all serve our residents here at the city of San Jose. We have shared constituency. Most of our residents don't differentiate between whether the services are coming from the city or the county, and so I just really want to value this opportunity. I think that by investing in our youth, focusing our concentrations on both our children and our adolescents go a long way. And really, for every dollar that we invest in the youth, we get twice the amount of productivity