OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Jose NSE Committee Meeting – December 11, 2025

City CouncilThursday, December 11, 2025
BodySan Jose, California
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, December 11, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:37:36
Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Hello, everyone.

0:12

I'm Council Member Peter Ortiz.

0:13

I'm chair of the NSE Committee, and we're going to go ahead and get started.

0:18

Before we begin, I want to remind the committee members and members of the public to follow

0:23

our code of conduct at meetings.

0:24

This includes only commenting on the specific agenda items before us and addressing the entire body, not us as individuals.

0:34

Public speakers will not engage in conversations with the chair, council members, or staff.

0:40

All members of the committee, staff, and the public are expected to refrain from abusive language,

0:46

failure to comply with the code of conduct, which will disturb, disrupt, or impede the orderly conduct will result in the removal of the committee.

0:54

from the meeting this meeting of the neighborhood services and education

0:58

committee will now come to order can the clerk please call the roll

1:02

here

1:06

here and chair Ortiz here you have a quorum great thank you so much and then we are going

1:17

to go to item one from the consent calendar and I'm actually going to request the pulling

1:24

of item one senior commission and parks and recreation commission annual reports

1:28

and work plans just for a quick question to staff if I could get a second

1:33

awesome thank you so much so if staff member can please come down hello Andrea

1:43

afternoon awesome thank you so much for for being here Andrea wanted to ask and

1:49

we got some emails and some concerns in regards to the work plan the PRNS work

1:56

plan seems like a commissioner is concerned about it and so wanted to see

2:02

if you you had the opportunity to address some of those concerns thank you

2:06

for the question chair and to the NSC committee members the Parks and Rec

2:11

Commission follows the guidance from both council policy 0-4 as well as the

2:17

use of the city clerk's template which is used for the development of all the

2:22

boards and commissions work plans we go through a process where in the past and

2:28

I have checked in with other Commission staff usually it's developed by staff

2:35

and then it's taken to Commission for final adoption and it's usually

2:39

discussed over one meeting this last year PRNS decided to have three

2:46

different conversations one to prepare the Commission for the items to be

2:51

just that they would want to bring forward we had that discussion on

2:56

January 27th and then again on May 7th we had an input session where we wanted

3:01

to hear from commissioners on what their priority items would be for the

3:04

following year as well as sharing with them what the committee's priority

3:09

items were going to also be for the coming year because as you know most of

3:14

our commission items first our work plan is developed with your priorities and so we layer

3:20

that into our work plan and then we see what space and capacity we have to bring further items so we

3:27

received the commission priorities in may and then we brought back a staff recommended work plan on

3:33

august 20th and that work plan was passed nine to one with one seat vacant okay so that's good for

3:41

to know and I mainly ask this just for the record and so there's it's mainly

3:45

been one individual who's making these claims it's not something that we're

3:49

hearing from other individuals to my understanding yes that is the one person

3:54

who voted against the work plan okay all right well thank you so much

3:58

Andrea I really really appreciate it thank you for it's I don't know if any

4:02

of my colleagues have any other questions no great I'll entertain a

4:05

motion oh do you have questions okay I thought you moved it chair but if not I

4:12

don't mind moving approval of the consent calendar all right thank you so

4:18

much if we could please call the vote

4:23

I'll take a verbal vote compost Candela's Cohen Juan yes Ortiz yes that

4:33

Motion passes unanimously great and my apologies. Do we have any public comment on that item?

4:39

No public comment. Okay, thank you so much now. I'll pass it off to staff to introduce the next item. Thank you

4:51

Council members I'm Lee Wilcox

4:53

assistant city manager

4:55

and current executive sponsor for our council focus area reducing unsheltered homelessness and

5:00

Joining me this afternoon is Eric Sullivan, our Housing Director, and John Cicerelli, our Director of Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Services.

5:10

We are extremely excited and pleased to share our status report for this focus area with you today.

5:16

I'm going to provide a brief snapshot of where we are, more importantly what we're learning, and how we're building long-term infrastructure to sustain the impact that we're making today.

5:28

this work reflects our city's commitment to both execution and adaptation where we're balancing

5:35

the urgency and immediate needs but also our long-term growth growth into system level thinking

5:46

here's a roadmap for today's discussion we'll walk through our implementation process share

5:50

key insights from the last six months that we've learned as a team and highlight where we're

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Homelessness███████████████████████23%
Parks and Recreation██████████████████████22%
Community Engagement████████████████████20%
Animal Services█████████████13%
Municipal Finance████████████12%
Public Safety███████7%
Personnel Matters███3%
Summary of Proceedings

San Jose Neighborhood Services and Education Committee Meeting – December 11, 2025

On December 11, 2025, the Neighborhood Services and Education Committee (NSE) met to discuss five major agenda items, including updates on unsheltered homelessness, neighborhood cleanup, parks funding, park fees, and animal care services. The meeting featured extensive public testimony, particularly on animal shelter operations.

Consent Calendar

  • The committee pulled item 1 (Senior Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission annual reports and work plans) for a brief discussion. Staff confirmed the work plan was approved by a 9-1 vote after three meetings. The consent calendar was then adopted unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Christian Greco (Winchester Orchard Neighborhood Association) showed photos of illegal dumping at Cypress Community Center and urged a city partnership to address the issue using innovative methods. He referenced city policy 0-40.
  • 17 speakers addressed animal care and services, including:
    • Mike Wagner criticized the calculation of the live release rate, alleging TNR cats were counted as return-to-field to inflate numbers.
    • Fatima, a foster volunteer, cited mismanagement and asked the committee to listen to first-hand reports.
    • Kathy (volunteer) requested soundproofing, secure dog walking access, and private volunteer entrances.
    • Ann DeShane noted a lost pet reporting gap and criticized a spay surgery death (cat Betty).
    • Rebecca Davis Matthews demanded a community action committee and financial audit of donations.
    • Anna reported ethics violations by an ACO and lack of disciplinary action.
    • Courtney, former staff, described a dog (Lola) left unattended with IV lines and leash, leading to its death, and blamed systemic failures.
    • Dinah and others advocated for prevention-focused strategies, reopening the TNR request list, and low-cost spay/neuter.
    • Elena Gaffney asked for a public commission and criticized opaque decision-making.
  • Open Forum: Courtney discussed a whistleblower report lack of follow-up. Elena urged adoption of ordinances on illegal breeding and mandatory microchipping. Kristina requested stronger breeding laws.

Discussion Items

1. Reducing Unsheltered Homelessness – Focus Area Status Report

  • Staff (Lee Wilcox, Eric Sullivan, John Cicerelli) presented an update on the council focus area. Key points:
    • Currently 2,150 shelter beds across 22 sites; last site (Cerrone) coming online early 2026.
    • Aim to achieve functional zero by optimizing shelter operations, sustainable funding (CalAIM), and data forecasting.
    • 125 re-encampments occurred in the first three months of the fiscal year, with two-thirds in the first 30 days.
    • Cost reduction efforts include RFP for security ($1.3M savings) and food ($1M projected).
  • Councilmember Campos questioned prevention, 20% cost reduction target (not on track), McKinney‑Vento data integration, and site performance variations.
  • Councilmember Candelas asked about the status of cost reductions and impact of encampment movement on neighborhoods. He urged coordinating with the county on prevention.
  • Vice Chair Dwan expressed concern about HMIS data integration and CalAIM revenue sustainability. Staff acknowledged system complexity and need for county collaboration.
  • Chair Ortiz noted the need for sustainable funding and thanked staff.
  • The committee voted unanimously to accept the report.

2. Cleaning Up Our Neighborhoods – Focus Area Status Report

  • Staff (Angel Rios, Rachel Roberts, John Cicerelli, Deputy Chief Sanchez, Valerie Osmond) reported:
    • 48% of residents rated their neighborhood as clean/very clean (up from 33% in Q1 2024).
    • Code enforcement cases increased; a new Chronic Offender Resolution and Enforcement (CORE) pilot begins January 2026.
    • Graffiti enforcement: 2 officers assigned to gang graffiti resulted in 33 arrests; graffiti removals declined for the first time.
    • Illegal dumping: Over 5,000 tons collected in FY24-25. Coordinated strategy with cameras yielded 73 referrals, 18 warnings, 17 citations.
    • Community education reached 2,800 youth; junk pickup participation up 66%.
  • Councilmember Campos highlighted multifamily outreach and jurisdictional challenges with Caltrans/Union Pacific.
  • Councilmember Candelas emphasized education and enforcement; noted a 66% increase in junk pickup.
  • Vice Chair Dwan suggested using savings from enforcement to fund more code enforcement.
  • Chair Ortiz praised the CORE pilot and asked about pilot selection criteria and scalability.
  • The committee voted unanimously to accept the report.

3. Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Community Impact Report

  • Staff (John Cicerelli, Amanda Rodriguez) updated on park maintenance funding:
    • San Jose ranks last among 15 largest California cities in park maintenance spending ($37/resident).
    • Polling showed 75% of voters support more funding; 54% support a two‑cent parcel tax concept; 21% undecided.
    • Exploring a sugar‑sweetened beverage tax (SSB) estimated to raise $27M/year.
    • Master plan to redistribute park fees equitably (District 6 generated $55M, District 3 $88M, others $1-7M over 10 years).
  • Councilmember Candelas praised volunteer hours (130,000 hours worth $5.2M) and raised concerns about regressive taxes. He asked staff to consider corporate taxes.
  • Vice Chair Dwan supported equity and urged proactive corporate partnerships.
  • Councilmember Cohen asked about the parcel tax polling (average lot 6,000 sq ft: 1¢ = $60/year). He supported leveraging undecided voters.
  • Chair Ortiz emphasized disparities (District 5 generated only $1.9M) and expressed excitement for equitable master plan.
  • The committee voted unanimously to accept the report.

4. Park Impact Ordinance and Parkland Dedication Ordinance – Annual Report

  • Raymond Costantino presented the five‑year CIP ($423M for 180 projects). FY24-25 park fees collected $9.8M (including interest). CNC tax revenue was $39M (down from $64.5M in 2021).
  • Chair Ortiz asked about deferring impact fees. Staff responded that they currently defer on a case‑by‑case basis but warned of delays in building parks.
  • The committee voted unanimously to accept the report.

5. Animal Care and Services Annual Report

  • Staff (Matt Lesh, Kiska Icard, Dr. Cather, new Deputy Director Monica Wiley) reported:
    • 4,600 animals adopted, 3,000 fostered, 1,141 strays reunited. 43% dog redemption rate.
    • Live release rate: 89% overall (95% dogs, 86% cats, 94% small animals).
    • Average daily animal count dropped from 822 to 408 over the past year due to capacity management.
    • TNR surgeries: 6,990 last year; now offering owned‑pet spay/neuter (dogs Wednesdays, cats Thursdays).
    • Audit: 24 of 36 recommendations submitted; target to submit all by Dec. 31, 2025; next audit report March 2026.
    • Staff described euthanasia criteria and tools (FAS scale, behavior assessments) and confirmed they do not euthanize for space.
  • Councilmember Campos asked about funding allocation ($17.5M annual budget), audit timeline, and community engagement. Monica Wiley noted top priorities: training, protocols, community collaboration.
  • Councilmember Candelas asked about the community action committee; Matt Lesh clarified it evolved into focus groups for specific audit recommendations. He also asked about TNR capacity; staff explained current three days of TNR plus owned cat/dog days and noted they do more TNR than comparable shelters.
  • Councilmember Cohen asked about contract reimbursement from other cities (Milpitas contract renewal in spring 2026) and welcomed Monica Wiley.
  • Vice Chair Dwan urged focusing on progress and allowing new director time. He emphasized mental health challenges for staff.
  • Chair Ortiz asked about dogs placed on “final,” staff described criteria and collaborative decision-making. He also asked about resource‑based euthanasia; staff confirmed no space‑based euthanasia. He raised backlog in TNR list and asked about reopening. Staff noted capacity management and dedicated staff for communication.
  • Chair Ortiz requested a supplemental direction for a financial breakdown in the next annual report; staff agreed.
  • The committee accepted the report unanimously.

Key Outcomes

  • All five agenda items were accepted unanimously by the committee.
  • Staff directed to include a detailed financial breakdown in the next Animal Care annual report to clarify resource allocation.
  • Staff to continue developing a community engagement framework for the animal shelter, as requested by the chair.
  • The next audit update on animal services will be presented to the full City Council in March 2026.
  • The committee will receive a status report on the CORE pilot for code enforcement at the April 2026 NSE meeting.

Meeting Transcript

Hello, everyone. I'm Council Member Peter Ortiz. I'm chair of the NSE Committee, and we're going to go ahead and get started. Before we begin, I want to remind the committee members and members of the public to follow our code of conduct at meetings. This includes only commenting on the specific agenda items before us and addressing the entire body, not us as individuals. Public speakers will not engage in conversations with the chair, council members, or staff. All members of the committee, staff, and the public are expected to refrain from abusive language, failure to comply with the code of conduct, which will disturb, disrupt, or impede the orderly conduct will result in the removal of the committee. from the meeting this meeting of the neighborhood services and education committee will now come to order can the clerk please call the roll here here and chair Ortiz here you have a quorum great thank you so much and then we are going to go to item one from the consent calendar and I'm actually going to request the pulling of item one senior commission and parks and recreation commission annual reports and work plans just for a quick question to staff if I could get a second awesome thank you so much so if staff member can please come down hello Andrea afternoon awesome thank you so much for for being here Andrea wanted to ask and we got some emails and some concerns in regards to the work plan the PRNS work plan seems like a commissioner is concerned about it and so wanted to see if you you had the opportunity to address some of those concerns thank you for the question chair and to the NSC committee members the Parks and Rec Commission follows the guidance from both council policy 0-4 as well as the use of the city clerk's template which is used for the development of all the boards and commissions work plans we go through a process where in the past and I have checked in with other Commission staff usually it's developed by staff and then it's taken to Commission for final adoption and it's usually discussed over one meeting this last year PRNS decided to have three different conversations one to prepare the Commission for the items to be just that they would want to bring forward we had that discussion on January 27th and then again on May 7th we had an input session where we wanted to hear from commissioners on what their priority items would be for the following year as well as sharing with them what the committee's priority items were going to also be for the coming year because as you know most of our commission items first our work plan is developed with your priorities and so we layer that into our work plan and then we see what space and capacity we have to bring further items so we received the commission priorities in may and then we brought back a staff recommended work plan on august 20th and that work plan was passed nine to one with one seat vacant okay so that's good for to know and I mainly ask this just for the record and so there's it's mainly been one individual who's making these claims it's not something that we're hearing from other individuals to my understanding yes that is the one person who voted against the work plan okay all right well thank you so much Andrea I really really appreciate it thank you for it's I don't know if any of my colleagues have any other questions no great I'll entertain a motion oh do you have questions okay I thought you moved it chair but if not I don't mind moving approval of the consent calendar all right thank you so much if we could please call the vote I'll take a verbal vote compost Candela's Cohen Juan yes Ortiz yes that Motion passes unanimously great and my apologies. Do we have any public comment on that item? No public comment. Okay, thank you so much now. I'll pass it off to staff to introduce the next item. Thank you

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com