San Jose City Council Meeting: Budget Message, SB 79, and Child Care Report (March 17, 2026)
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
All right, good afternoon, everyone.
I would like to call to order this meeting of the San Jose City Council for the afternoon of March 17th.
Tony, would you please call the roll?
Come?
Campos.
Present.
Tordillos.
Here.
Owen.
Ortiz.
Present.
Mulcakey.
Here.
Duan.
Here.
Kendallas.
Here.
Casey.
Foley.
Mayhem.
Here.
You have a quorum.
Great.
Thank you.
Now, if you're able, please stand and join us in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Pledge allegiance to the flag.
Thank you.
Today's invocation will be provided by David Mulvahill, Chief of Operations of the Nouveau Hospitality Group and downtown Stakeholder.
And Councilmember Tordillos will tell us more.
Thank you, Mayor.
Good afternoon, everyone, and happy St.
Patrick's Day.
Today we're especially lucky to have someone with true Irish roots joining us to deliver our invocation.
David Mulvahill moved to the Bay Area from Ireland in 2001 and now proudly calls downtown San Jose home.
Originally from the countryside of Tillamore.
Sorry if I'm butchering the pronunciation there.
Ireland, David often says that while San Jose is a big city, the warmth and hospitality of our downtown businesses and residents give it that same small town feeling he grew up with.
Many of you know David from O'Flaherty's Irish pub, where he began bartending over 15 years ago before becoming a partner in the business nine years ago.
Since then he has played a major role in shaping our downtown food and nightlife scene as a founder and partner of Nouveau Hospitality.
Through ventures like Five Points, Dr.
Funk, Hello Good Burger, Playback Coffee in the Press Room.
David has helped to make downtown San Jose a vibrant and welcoming place for both our residents and our visitors.
Thank you.
So that was my first introduction to the Bay Area.
And um this is the story of quite a few Irish emigrants that we don't hear about.
So you know, I started out on a construction site, not knowing what I was doing, bounced around from job to job.
I was an undocumented worker for 10 years.
So sometimes it takes a lot longer to get to the American dream than you think, but I feel like it builds your character.
I might as well give you a job.
So I started bartending and really found that um I loved uh people and working with people, uh, meeting new people, and I just felt a great sense of relief that um I'd actually found purpose in life.
And um I kept going with that.
Um I actually started doing yoga at the time.
Uh, when you're an undocumented worker, you know, you can have to start having some mental health issues when you're missing funerals, uh weddings, and missing your loved ones.
So I found uh yoga was a really good outlet for me.
And uh I don't know whether Rio Flathardy got wind of that or not, but um he offered to make me manager of a Flattery's Irish pub.
And at the time, you know, it was um you had to go away and be a yoga instructor.
You had to go away for three months.
And um I uh remember calling my mom in Ireland.
I said, hey, um what should I do here?
And she said, you can be a yoga instructor anytime you want.
And uh so I said, okay, Raya, let's do it.
And then of course, Ray got sick, and I was left uh looking after the bar with the help of the whole Flarity family, but they had their own career, so I felt like I was drawn to the wolves and not much experience in managing anything.
Uh I was barely figuring out how to manage myself at the time.
But anyway, we got it, we got it up and running.
We we figured it out and kept with it, and then you know, became a partner and then offered um, you know, you know, I got a group of investors together.
We did five points, and then we did um uh COVID hit, so I decided what the hell um I'm on a roll here, let's do Dr.
Funks and uh Hella Good Burger.
And um, kind of in the middle of that, I always talk back to about whether I should have been a yoga instructor or not.
And I was drinking quite heavily at the time, and I always said to myself, your health is your walt.
I said, What are you doing?
Like you you're you're being the stereotypical Irish bar owner drinking every night.
So five years ago, uh I decided to stop drinking, and then um that's kind of where I feel like I became really, really happy in hospitality and definitely found my way around 2013 as well.
I left out, I eventually got my green card and uh eventually got my citizenship, which uh I'm very honored to have.
But uh throughout the whole journey, a lot of people don't understand uh the emigrant story, especially um that's just a typical Irish emigrant story.
And there's obviously, I think San Jose is made up of 40 percent of the population is from outside of the country, and whether they're from Europe, Latin America, or Asia.
I think um uh most people have worked really hard to get them into position, to get themselves into position to be successful.
And um, through through everything, I feel like it builds character.
But the most important thing in San Jose is I never ever felt like an outsider.
Uh San Jose people, whether it's uh, you know, the people the customers coming into the bar, our local politicians, people working with City Hall, PD.
I mean, it's just such a such a great community.
Like, not once that I feel I felt like a celebrity, like you know, here, you know, you're walking around non-documented worker, meant to be keeping your head down, and people coming into the pub to say hello to you, or you know, it just it's just a phenomenal community, and we're so lucky uh to have the community we have, and uh I'm just honored to be part of it.
And this is one of the biggest honors of my life to be actually asked to speak here today in front of you guys.
So thank you.
I appreciate it.
Thank you, David.
That was beautifully said.
Loved hearing your story, your reflection today.
Great inspiration to start our meeting.
Thank you, Councilmember Tordillas for setting that up.
And we will move into our ceremonial items.
I believe we just have one today, Council members Condelas and uh Vicemor Foley, please join me at the podium.
We will recognize and proclaim March 21st as World Down Syndrome Day.
Thanks, I'm trusting.
All right, good afternoon, everyone, and happy St.
Patrick's Day.
Um, today, um, along with Vice Mayor uh Pam Foley and the City Council.
I'm uh proud to recognize March 21st as World Down Syndrome Day here in the city of San Jose.
Um this day is observed to advocate for the rights of individuals with down syndrome, a condition where a child is born with an extra 21st chromosome.
That is why uh the recognition falls on the 21st of March to signify the triplication of the 21st chromosome.
You may also notice many of us are wearing uh mismatched colorful socks.
I gotta point to my socks, you see.
Uh, as part of the Lots of Socks campaign, uh a symbol of the uniqueness of the individuals with Down syndrome, and it is meant to spark conversations about awareness, acceptance, and most importantly, inclusion.
Um in District 8, we have meaningful opportunities to celebrate and support.
We are fortunate to have the annual Baria Buddy Walk at Lake Cunningham Park alongside uh San Andres Regional Center, uh, who are also joined uh by today uh as well as many other partners.
I'd like to uh quickly highlight the work of uh the San Andres Regional Center, a community-based nonprofit.
And that's why I've invited Vice Mayor Pampoli, who uh does the annual disability uh awareness day here at City Hall.
Um, the regional center plays an important role in ensuring that individuals with uh development developmental disabilities have access to these services, resources, and support they need to live full and meaningful lives as members of our community.
As uh one of California's uh regional centers, it works to provide diagnostic services, infant education, specialized daycare, community living arrangements, and and much more.
Uh, thank you for all the work that you all do.
Uh, we are fortunate to count on support of some of these great great advocates, and uh now I have the honor of inviting you Lisa as Askernuga and Yakelin Campos, uh Councilmember Foley Stokaya to say a few words before the mayor presents the proclamation.
Come on up.
Um thank you.
Uh two sexy menela and cousin members.
Good afternoon.
My name is Julisa Ares Kurinada.
I am the first Sumba instructor who has Down syndrome.
We celebrate celebrate inclination, love, and diversity on syndrome, a wonder.
I am person who believe in opportunities, thank you, you guys when very one is included, very one shy.
Yes, my thank you.
Hi everyone.
My name is Jacqueline Campos, and I am the mother of Itzamaya Nunez.
And yes, she had an extra chromosome 21, and thank God she's very healthy.
And thank you, council members and mayor, for having the recognition of um acknowledgement of these uh individuals.
They all they also have a dreams and they have a purpose on life.
And I am so grateful, mainly for the mainstreaming and full inclusion in our community because they live in the community, they need to be inclusive in their community.
Um I face a little challenges when she started kindergarten.
Um it wasn't too common for a little kid with down syndrome to be in a regular mainstreaming class.
But when I explain them, they live in this community, they need to get to know their neighbors, they need to know to get everyone here.
So and thank you for the full inclusion.
My daughter went uh full included all the time.
Um I make her rights valid, and I thank all the parents that struggle to make these happen for us to enjoy and have this.
But I always told the teachers don't get discouraged, just keep focusing, and she will get social skills behavior, and a lot of stuff that you would it's priceless for me.
And thank God my daughter is very well behaving.
She has really good manners because of all this.
And I was at the hospital the sick the next day I gave birth to her.
I was getting in touch with San Andreas the next day.
Within seven days we're home, the social worker came and everyone, everything started.
So thank you for the services and recognition of these individuals that are just pure love.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Thank you for the new great.
Fantastic.
You guys both like to hold this?
Well, this is going to take a picture of the phone.
Let's take a photo.
One, two, three.
One, two, three.
Awesome.
Thank you.
We've got to thank you guys for coming to the city hall.
Thank you.
All right.
We are moving on to orders of the day.
I'm not aware of any requests to change the agenda.
Do we have any?
Don't see any.
Okay.
We'll go on to the closed session report.
It's council met in closed session this morning to go over the items that were listed on the agenda.
With the exception of section B, um, the conference with the labor negotiators, items one, two, three, four, and five, and six, seven.
We're all taken off calendar, we're not heard.
There's nothing else to report at this time.
Thank you, Susanna.
All right.
Next is the consent calendar.
Are there any items council would like to pull from consent?
Okay.
Seeing none.
Do we have a motion to approve the consent calendar?
No vote approval.
Second.
Great.
Thank you.
Tony, do we have public comment on consent?
I have no cards for this item.
All right, let's vote.
Motion passes unanimously with Cohen absent.
Okay.
Thank you.
We are on to, and I'm sorry, Councilman Wilkehew, was that on consent?
Did I miss you?
I have your hand up.
Oh, sorry.
No, no, it's okay.
Okay.
Um, moving on to report of the city manager.
Uh thank you, Mayor.
I do not have a report today.
Okay.
Thank you.
Moving right along.
We're on to item 3.4 child care policy opportunities status report.
We have a staff presentation.
So we'll jump into that when staff is ready.
Good afternoon.
I'm Emily Lamp, Director of the Office of Administration Policy and Intergovernmental Relations, and we're here to present to you on child care.
Before we dive in, I'll briefly review what brings us here today.
On September 30th of last year, we came to you with our proposed focused area framework.
At that meeting, there were discussions of potentially adding a problem area related to child care to one of our focus areas.
In response, staff offered that changes to focus area scope are best accomplished through the budget process, but indicated that it would be possible to bring forward a high-level policy re overview on child care to NSE to provide context on the issue.
The City Council directed staff to return with a report to NSE in February of 2026.
Staff delivered that report at the February 12th, 2026 NSE meeting.
The committee then voted to cross-reference the report to City Council for March 17th, which brings us here today.
I'll note that during the NSC committee discussion, there were requests to conduct some additional research and bring it to this meeting.
So with that, I'll turn it over to Peter Hamilton on our team to go through the presentation, including the additional research in response to the committee's request.
Good afternoon.
Peter Hamilton, assistant to the city manager in the city manager's office.
So this report is really just a very high-level overview.
So it doesn't go into great depth, but the point is just to provide some context on the child care issue.
To that end, we did a very brief survey of other what other jurisdictions in the United States are doing.
And this is the kind of the information we presented to the committee.
California in this school year implementing a universal transitional kindergarten program for four-year-olds.
San Francisco in 2018 passed a local tax measure that provides almost 200 million a year for child care programs and allowing subsidy subsidized child care up to 150% of area median income for San Francisco residents.
New Mexico announced last year that they were intending to implement fully subsidized child care for all residents, primarily relying on oil and gas tax revenue to the tune of uh several hundred million dollars.
An interesting program in Michigan where the state employers and employees each uh can share one third of child care costs.
Uh but to be eligible, an employee has to have an uh participating employer and has to meet certain income thresholds.
So when we presented this to the committee, uh there were questions, you know, like a little bit more context about what other local jurisdictions are doing on the issue of child care.
So did a little bit more research on that uh for this presentation.
This is looking at large cities in California, other than uh San Jose and San Francisco.
Uh so Los Angeles uh during the pandemic initiated a licensed child care program where they planned for 10 licensed child care centers, uh, but it was funded with one-time money, which is now uh exhausted and they're transitioning those to other operators.
Uh San Diego established an Office of Child and Youth Success to implement their child and youth strategic plan.
One of the goals in that plan is to identify funding sources for child care subsidies, but I don't believe San Francisco San Diego is actually done that yet.
It's more a policy goal.
Uh Sacramento operates a number of workforce development programs for child care workers in Long Beach collaborated with a number of other agencies to form a nonprofit in 2017 that provides resources to both families and child care providers.
So note here that these these peer cities we don't see like a large local funding measure like we saw in San Francisco.
There are some smaller cities in California that have done local funding.
Santa Cruz in 2021 devoted about 20% of their cannabis tax to early care and education activities.
Oakland in 2018 2018 passed a local parcel tax.
Um but in this next slide really tried to get at that issue nationwide.
Where do we see other local jurisdictions, whether a city or county generating local revenue?
So we have a real mix here.
Uh voters in Seattle passed a measure in 2018 based on property tax, Multanoma County in 2020, an income tax.
Uh, and then the rest of the cities are could kind of combined jurisdictions like San Francisco, um, also uh Denver, New York, and Philadelphia also in various ways providing uh local funding uh for subsidized child care.
Uh so that's just a little little extra context for the committee questions.
So uh the next part here is just looking at what are kind of some typical child, what categories of activity for local agencies on the issue of child care and what is San Jose doing currently.
Uh so one um one area that many cities participate in is provision of child care at city facilities.
And this is a list of programs run through our Parks Recreation and Neighborhood Service Department that currently meet some child care needs, uh, notably San Jose Recreation Preschool for three to five-year-olds, it's three hours a day, four days a week, and uh last year served about 211 participants.
And the rest of them are you know after school or meeting, you know, providing child care for breaks in the school calendar.
So important to note here this is not licensed child care.
There's a kind of exception in state law for public agencies that provide recreational programs that do not have to be licensed under state law to provide child care, uh, but they are operate under certain restrictions, such as limited hours per week.
Um providing licensed child care would be um come with substantially substantial obligations, particularly for facilities as described in the staff report and uh would require some some investment to bring uh facilities up to uh state licensing criteria if the city wanted to do licensed child care.
Uh uh subsidies.
Uh the San Jose currently provides uh a little over a million dollars in subsidies for its various recreation programs that serve a child care need.
Um, this San Francisco provides, you know, as I mentioned, really very substantial subsidies.
So this is a kind of an area where you know the effort can vary really considerably based on uh based on available resources.
Uh funding for co-location and affordable housing is part of the 2223 budget.
The council allocated $900,000 to help fund child care facilities in ground floor retail space with city funded affordable housing developments.
Uh to date, one project has been completed and additional funding uh remains for additional projects.
Uh the zoning code regulates where child care facilities can be located.
Currently, daycare centers are allowed in most zoning districts with a special use permit, uh, which is approved at a planning director's hearing and appealable to the planning commission.
Um currently um uh child care centers co-located with schools or religious assembly uses are exempt uh from needing an SUP as our daycare homes.
Uh important to note that assembly bill 752 now requires us to exempt uh child care facilities co-located with multiple um multifamily housing.
So planning staff is currently working to bring forward the zoning code amendment to comply with that that new state law.
Uh training in business development.
So this is um training for providers or helping uh individuals who own businesses uh be successful at operating a child care business.
So the library operates the family uh friends, families, and neighbors network program, which helps individuals such as grandparents, neighbors, babysitters who provide child care and provides uh training and support for them.
Important to note that that uh program is slated to end uh at the end of this fiscal year.
And then the boost program, which is a grant of uh slightly over a million dollars uh out of CG CDBG funds administered by the housing department to a nonprofit called Upwards to provide business development support to um uh owners of family child care uh homes uh and served, I believe 211 uh businesses last year.
Uh the children use services master plan has an intersection with child care.
So implementation of the uh demonstration sites, the no wrong door uh approach to those sites aims to connect um residents who may need child care support with the services that may be available to them.
And it's also an opportunity for coordination in 2026.
PRNS staff convened an internal working group uh to um align um you know staff across the city with the um no wrong door approach and provide training uh to that end and also just a brief note of other agencies in the county that are working on these issues.
Office of children and families policy is an office at the county that's currently working on a um child care blueprint to um examine how um vulnerable populations and intersect with county services can have their child care uh needs met more effectively.
Uh the Santa Clara County Office of Education, which um helps connect families who need child care with available services and also provide uh training and support for child care providers and similarly uh first five, which is piloted uh number of programs that provide uh support for child care providers.
Uh and that's the end of our presentation.
Great.
Thank you for the report.
We appreciate it.
Tony, do we have public comment?
Um, yes, I have several cards.
Are we at one minute or two?
Start at one minute today given the high volume of comments expected, and then if we have to, we'll we'll take it down to 45 seconds later.
But let's stay at a minute for now.
Thank you.
Um, when I call your name, um please you can come down in no particular order.
First person, the microphone, just approach the microphone and start speaking.
The others line up behind.
I have Veronica.
I have Veronica, um, it looks like Alicia Zamudio, Alydia, and Amelda come on down.
And I will say that they all of these people put children and youth services master plan, but they may be talking about it for the budget message.
I'm gonna call all of the names.
If this is not the item you wanted to talk on, that's fine, we'll move on.
We'll call you again for 3.4.3.
Alma, Maria, Brenda, and Destiny.
Okay, I'm gonna assume you guys all want to speak on 3.3, and we'll call you back then.
Thank you back to council.
Okay, yeah, I'm seeing some heads nod, so I think that's right.
Okay, great.
Excellent.
Okay, coming back to the council.
We have a number of hands.
Let's see.
Oh, we have a couple.
We'll go to Councilmember Compos.
Thank you, Mayor.
I want to begin by thanking staff.
Uh, thank you to Peter Hamilton, Emily Lamb, and Angel Rios for this report and presentation.
I also want to highlight the work of so many staff across the many city departments that provide valuable services and support for families and children in our community.
This includes direct services provided by PRNS staff who support the San Jose Recreational Preschool, the recreation of city kids or rock after school program, Camp San Jose, and similar programs that allow parents and guardians to work knowing that their children are safe and nurtured.
This also includes the San Jose Public Library staff who support the extremely successful friends, family, and neighbors, neighbors, or FFN network program, in addition to operating library programming.
The return on investment of this program is very high since FFNs provide low-cost and accessible child care to parents and guardians who otherwise would not be able to contribute to our economy, finish their education, or secure credentialing.
However, the report also reveals the indirect and important work provided by other city departments to improve child care access in our community.
Because too often we forget that child care providers are also small business operators.
Currently, the city of San Jose has around 500 to a thousand family child care home providers.
Only 10% of those family child care home providers in our city are uh enrolled at maximum capacity.
If you all didn't know how our child care operators are paid, it's by attendance, not enrollment.
So first they need to have fully enrolled um businesses so that they can have that maximum uh income.
And what we're seeing in San Jose is that they only have 10% of what is needed to really make a living in our city.
On average, our family child care home providers are earning 38,000 a year.
That means over 66% of our providers are struggling to make basic to meet basic needs, such as food, housing, and health care.
The city of San Jose also has a 39% capacity gap for families who need access to child care.
What this means is that one in three families with a child care voucher have no place to access child care in our city.
These are parents who could otherwise participate in the workforce.
Planning, building, and code enforcement staff assist these small businesses who must comply with local regulations in our zoning ordinance and in council policy 614 guidelines for child daycare.
Critically, state laws override our land use regulations governing child care operators and require regular updates to our codes.
PBCE staff also work on environmental review that child care operators are subject to.
Regular updates can reduce the regulatory burden experienced by these small businesses.
Housing department and library staff collaborated to administer a grant program that brought child care co-located with affordable housing to our community.
Department of Staff, uh Department of Finance staff carefully enforce Senate Bill 234 that ensures businesses operating a family child care home are not improperly paying business fees and business taxes.
And this memo and presentation elevate work that often is taken for granted and sometimes invisible to us.
What I hope to convey is that the city plays a major role in child care.
We are the land use authority that determines where and how child care can operate.
We impose and collect taxes and fees that affect the economic viability of child care as a business when margins are razor thin.
And we even provide direct services and recognition of the reality that child care is often neither affordable nor accessible.
Child care is crucial for San Jose's economic infrastructure and provides a stable foundation for San Jose to thrive as a business friendly city.
Because when families lack access to affordable child care, working parents are forced to arrive late to work or leave early.
They forego promotions, they postpone the pursuit of higher education or work training programs, and sometimes they leave the workforce altogether.
I know we have many parents on this council and on this day is today, and I'd like to you to reflect on what kind of support you and your family received when you were raising your young children that allowed you to be where you are today.
I appreciate my colleagues on the neighborhood services and education committee for cross-referencing this item for the full city council to review, and I move to accept the report, and I look forward to continuing the discussion during the budget message approval later today.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Let's go to Councilmember Casey.
Thank you, Mayor.
I want to thank Councilmember Campos for her passion in this area and continue to push this topic.
It can really hit you in the pocket book and make things difficult.
My concern, and I think we should do everything we can as a city to encourage the marketplace and pull whatever levels we can in order to create a robust child care market.
I'm concerned though with Mission Creep.
And we showed San Francisco as an example and the idea that at some point we're gonna use some taxing mechanism as a funding mechanism to pursue an opportunity to create child care from the city perspective.
And we live in a regional workforce area.
The problem I have is if we do find a funding mechanism, and I don't need to go into that, I'm not a big tax guy, but putting that aside for a second, just a practical matter.
If San Jose provides child care, child care, we have most of our workers are working in Santa Clara, Sunnyville, and these different areas.
So effectively, we're gonna be subsidizing other companies in other cities, their workforce through child care mechanisms that we fund.
And it's only going to exacerbate the job to housing imbalance that we have here today.
So I'm not sure how we would practically if we did, and this is again assuming hypothetically we're gonna move toward the mission creep is gonna happen, we're gonna move towards creating a funding mechanism and providing child care as a city.
This is a regional problem, and it's a regional problem that should be addressed on a county, state, and federal level.
So I would just caution us.
Uh, my concern would be in terms of practical application of this.
We're gonna provide daycare effectively for companies that are outside of San Jose and subsidize their workforce's child care, and that's that's just a concern of mine uh moving down the line.
But I I appreciate your passion, and I do think it's a serious concern, and one that we should be addressing, but we should be creating a marketplace here in San Jose, pulling all the levers we can to really support folks that are in this industry.
Thank you.
All right, thank you.
Appreciate the dialogue.
Let's go to Councilmember Kameh next.
Thank you.
Um, I'd like to also thank Councilmember Campos uh for bringing this forward.
Uh, you know, this is uh this is a topic that is not just gonna be for today or tomorrow or the next year.
I think this is something that we as a community really need to uh take in.
Uh many of us who have been in education know of the declining enrollment and the shift, even though it was good to be able to introduce TK in our system, it pulled all of the really good child care workers who were able to make more money, and it was a good thing to be able to make more money, but it's harder from zero to four uh to be able to have the the uh the uh workforce to be able to do um the uh important work of when they're really, really young.
And of course, the ratio to to um uh to each teacher is is um is different when you have the younger ages.
So I think that um you know we we should keep this in mind.
We know that uh you know, a couple of years ago uh there were studies done that uh really emphasized that child care was now the number one issue for many workers and companies, that it was no longer health care, but child care that was really taking over.
And um I think that we should keep that in mind.
I know that we're in a very difficult budget crunch right now, but I think that that that is something that, in terms of trying to even attract talent to our workforce.
I will say that when I was at the uh Valley Water, um, we actually provided, we had a facility where we provided affordable child care for our employees.
It wasn't free, but it was very reduced in terms of what it would uh charge for uh child care, and it was right there next to Valley Waters headquarters.
Uh it was something that everyone thought, oh, you can't do it, you can't do it.
Yes, you can do it.
And it was a tremendous benefits for those moms and dads who worked at Valley Water right there on Almadone Expressway.
So I think that uh even if it's uh small steps, I think that it also is a great way to provide uh tremendous amenity to uh working families.
So um I think that um in the future we should keep this in mind as something that um we're not looking for mission creep or anything like that, uh, but I think that there are many who are very interested in what can be done, especially when you look at how expensive child care is becoming.
So thank you, Councilmember Campos.
Thank you, Council.
Let's go to Council Tordillos.
Thank you.
I wanted to start by also just expressing my thanks to Councilmember Campos for her leadership here.
I was struck uh by one of the comments from Councilmember Casey about you know any local, locally driven child care policy does have the potential to kind of disproportionately benefit employers outside of the city.
I think that that is definitely true.
Uh but I would note that the families that are struggling with child care costs are largely people who are living in our communities here in San Jose.
So I think it's about finding that balance.
And to uh Councilmember Kamei's points, I think if we are able to have some movement here and helping to support our working families with child care costs, that could actually make San Jose a more attractive place for new companies to set up shop and generate those jobs that we want to see locally.
Uh but to Councilmember Casey's point, I do think that this is a regional problem.
I think as we move forward would make sense to see if this is something that makes more sense to do as a city or as a county, uh, given that we know that the impacts extend far beyond San Jose.
So thank you.
Thanks, Council.
We'll go to Councilmember Ortiz.
Thank you, Mayor.
Um, I want to thank my colleagues for their comments.
Thank you, Councilmember uh Campos for elevating this very important cause.
Um, when I was on the Santa Clara County Board of Education representing uh San Jose, also uh back then it also represents my trustee represents District 7 and it would be downtown.
Um I saw just how important it was to invest in early childhood education and how by supporting youth we're really meeting um a variety of goals and not just education, but um by investing in youth you're supporting public safety by investing in youth you are um supporting a uh a future competent workforce to go uh uh generate a a strong uh economy.
Um not to mention how we saw during COVID-19 um the disproportionate impact uh to women in the workforce, uh a lack of child care uh caused for our our community.
I could also you know see my colleagues' perspectives on um on this being a regional issue, um and I think we could have an approach of yes and yes, it's a regional issue, yes, the county um needs to play a leadership role, but the city can support as well.
Um and so I I look forward to this conversation and um I I support um the contents of of the report.
Thank you.
Thanks, Councilmember uh Councilmember Campos.
I just want to appreciate all my colleagues for their their comments, um, their interest in this topic.
Um really appreciate Councilmember Kameh uh bringing up the affordability component because we can't have this conversation and not talk about affordability when child care is the second highest expense in a family's budget.
And we should also not forget that even though they can't vote, children are still our constituents.
And so the idea that the responsibility is for the county or the state only, uh, as Councilmember Ortiz said, this is not an either uh or conversation, this is an and.
How can the city be a stronger partner to our children, our youth, the the partners and the agencies that serve them because we do not operate in silos as government agencies, we complement one another, we work together.
And the U.S.
Chamber of Com Commerce uh foundation has always seen child care as a two-generation workforce issue, essential to support the workforce of today and vital to develop our workforce of tomorrow.
So given that we have so many uh council members who were school board uh trustees before this, you should understand that third grade uh reading level milestone is a huge marker and indicator for future success.
And when children have access to child care and early learning experience, it not only supports their parents, but it supports them, our children, in being prepared for kindergarten on day one.
And if they are not ready on day one, it is a sprint to catch up to that third grade uh reading level milestone, and that's why as a city it we should be even more inclined to make sure that we are setting up not just our current but our future workforce for success.
And so I I'd just like to again thank my colleagues for their interest and their comments on this topic.
Thanks, Councilmember.
Councilmember Duane.
Thank you, Mayor.
Thank you, Council Councilmember Compose for putting this to attention of another community.
I appreciate um Councilmember Casey point of it's a regional problem.
But I would believe this.
We can be the leader in this region.
We can start and then we can adjust, but if we don't do anything, we're still exactly where we started.
We never start.
And so I think it's extremely important that the preschool allow our children to be on point when they go to K1 through eight.
In order to create the intelligence that we need right here in the what you call the capital of Silicon Valley.
And being a parent of three kids, trust me, I I understand the struggle of finding child care, getting affordable child care.
And then having your child in a place where you feel safe.
They feel safe.
You feel safe.
Therefore, the family unit can come together at night as one.
And I think it's important that we start now, not later.
And um, I will be supporting.
Thank you.
Thanks, Councilmember.
I'll just add my thanks to Councilmember Campos for uh her strong advocacy for a uh service that uh certainly foundational.
Appreciate all my colleagues' comments.
Uh good to hear the diversity of viewpoints and the um respectful dialogue.
Uh certainly is uh the case that accessible, affordable, high-quality child care is foundational for healthy families and a healthy economy.
I think we'll have a lot of discussion over the coming years about the city's role in supporting that ecosystem and doing what we can to make sure that it is available, that child care that is accessible, affordable, and high quality is available to families here because we know how important it is.
Uh challenging, of course, in this budget environment and with all the other core services that the city uh is relied upon uh to provide, but an important conversation, and one that I know we're going to continue.
So thank you.
Tony, let's vote on the motion to accept the staff report motion passes unanimous unanimously with all present.
Great, thank you.
Okay.
We are on to land use.
A couple of items.
We will start with item 10 point two, which um is the amendment to Title 20 to add Senate Bill 79 Industrial Ordinance, and then we have item 10.3 analysis on Senate Bill 79, Assembly Bill 130, and historic resources and policy recommendations.
So we will have a joint presentation on items 10.2 and 10.3, and we will hear them at the same time, including the public comment on both items, but we will vote on the items separately.
And we do have a staff presentation.
So, Chris, when you and the team are ready, go ahead and jump in.
Thank you, Mayor.
Uh Chris Burton, director of planning building code enforcement.
I'm joined today by Meneer Sand here, the deputy director for planning, Jared Ferguson, Principal Planet and uh Citywide Planning Team and Dana Peak, our historic preservation officer.
Um so yes, as you mentioned, we'll be giving you a joint presentation on items 10.2 and 10.3, um, which are related to the city's implementation on Senate Bill 79.
We've been busy since we saw you last earlier in the year, uh, working a way to establish the local framework uh that will exempt qualifying industrial hubs uh throughout the city to preserve our key employment lands while remaining compliant with state law.
And then 10.3 uh provides the requested follow-up analysis on how SB 79, when used in conjunction with Assembly Bill 130, affects the city's historic resources and provides some recommendations that we believe uh will help provide clarity uh around those issues.
Um and so with that, I'm gonna hand it to Jared to lead off the presentation.
All right.
Thanks, Chris.
Jared Ferguson, uh principal planner.
Um first, just a quick background.
I I know we um spent a lot of time talking about SB 79 in January, but just as a refresher, um so Senate Bill 79 was signed on October 10th, um, takes effect July 1st of this year.
Um it streamlines housing development and makes housing an allowed use on any site currently zoned for residential mixed use or commercial within one half mile of qualifying transit stops.
It also sets maximum heights and densities that this that a city can't preclude a development from achieving.
And I'll go through um what those qualifying transit stops are in a minute.
So, first, just a recap from our January 27th City Council meeting.
The city council direction from that meeting first was one to designate qualifying industrial areas identified in the general plan as employment areas as industrial employment hubs and exempting residential or not sorry, non-residential sites within those areas from the provisions of SB 79.
To return in the future with an ordinance exempting sites with no walking path less than one mile from the location of the TOD stops after further analysis.
Additionally, to come back with future action to add minimum densities in the downtown core and to explore minimum densities in other growth areas based on further analysis.
And then lastly, to return with analysis on the adequacy of CEQA to protect historic resources under SB 79, given the new CEQA exemption created under AB 130 last year.
So we're here today, as Chris mentioned, to talk to you about one and four within that direction here.
So getting back into the recap and background of SB 79, uh it creates two tiers of transit-oriented development stops that qualify under the uh SB 79.
The first tier, tier one, is applicable in San Jose to our electrified Caltrain stations, our current BART stations, and our future BART stations.
So we have 10 total uh tier one stations in or adjacent to San Jose that can be classified as tier one.
And then tier two stations are all of our light rail stations, both uh planned and current stations, as well as bus rapid transit with dedicated lanes.
So we have a total of 46 in or adjacent to San Jose and Tier 2.
Um this is our our draft map to the right there, um denoting the two tiers of stations.
Um the purple is the tier one stations, and then the blue, the light blue are the tier two stations.
So as I mentioned, um SB 79 creates standards, both height and density, um, that this that the city can't preclude a development from achieving.
Um, and it sets those standards within each tier, and then there are three layers to those tiers.
So the highest density is afforded to those parcels adjacent to directly adjacent to the TOD stop, so within 200 feet of the pedestrian access point, um, and then uh density decreases as you get into the quarter mile radius and then decreases again as you're into the half mile radius.
So, as we covered in that January 27th meeting, there are a number of ways in which cities can exempt either parcels or areas from the provisions of SB 79.
One of those is the industrial employment hub exclusion.
So this is a very specific uh exclusion, um, one that the city advocated for, including um, so that it was able to exempt its key employment areas.
Um so this applies to uh areas of at least 250 acres uh that are contiguous employment lands that were defined in a general plan prior to January 1st, 2025.
And then all parcels within those areas must be primarily dedicated to industrial sites.
Or industrial use, sorry.
Uh in San Jose, we have five of those areas.
So North San Jose, Berriessa International Business Park, Lundy Milpedis Bart, East Gish, Mayberry, Monterey Business Corridor, Old Edenville, and Old Edenville Transit Employment Center.
So these are all employment lands areas that were dedicated that were dedicated in our original or designated, excuse me, in our original general plan in 2011.
So meeting all meeting that standard in terms of time.
So all of these areas exceed well exceed the 250 acres and all have substantial amounts of land designated to industrial uses in the general plan.
So with the lowest being 70%, but most well above that.
So kind of going through the areas in more detail, we've created these detailed maps.
So this map contains the first three hubs that were designating.
The first North San Jose, the largest.
You'll note here as well on this map, we've noted which sites have residential overlays or have an underlying designation that allow for residential uses.
So those sites are not going to be exempt from SB 79, but all other sites within the employment area, employment, sorry, industrial employment hub would be excluded from the provisions of SB 79.
So this map shows the three areas, North San Jose, Berriessa Industrial Business Park, Lundy Melpedispart, to the Northeast, and then to the southeast East Gish Mayberry.
And the circles there are showing you the half-mile buffers from the stations.
So moving south, the next area is our Monterey Business Corridor.
This has several parcels adjacent to the Tamian station area.
You can see the buffers there.
And then our last hub, the old Edenville, Old Edenville Transit Employment Center, adjacent to the Santa Teresa Light Rail and Cottle Light Rail Station.
So just going through the timeline for our ordinance.
So we're here before you today for the first hearing on this ordinance.
We'll come back next week on the 24th for a second reading.
Immediately following that, we'll submit the ordinance to the Department of Housing and Community Development, HCD, for their review.
And then the ordinance would take effect 30 days following that second reading, so on April 23rd 2026.
And then that's before the July 1st effective date of SB 79.
And I'll pass it to Dana to continue the presentation.
Good afternoon.
As part of the SB 79 discussion on January 27th, the council also directed staff to provide additional analysis on whether the city could adequately rely on California Environmental Quality Act to protect historic resources under SB 79, given the new ministerial process and CECA exemption for housing development under AB 130.
Staff started the work by doing GIS analysis to understand where identified historic resources are in relation to the transportation development or TOD areas.
There are 56 transit stations that are impacted by the provisions of SB 79.
Staff identified approximately 17 TOD areas that contain designated storic resources listed in the historic resources inventory.
The highest concentration is within six TOD stop areas within and adjacent to downtown.
The figure on the slide illustrates the concentration of historic resources around St.
James and St.
Santa Clara TOD areas that include the Hensley, St.
James Park, and downtown commercial historic districts.
These smaller scale historic resources will face significant development pressure because SB 79 specifies maximum heights and densities within a half mile of these transit stops.
Staff analyze the interface of SB 79 with AB 130, another state housing law.
AB 130 exempts most residential projects in urban areas from environmental review under CEQA if the project meets certain criteria, like consistency with the general plan, land use designation, and or zoning, minimum density requirements, specific site size, location requirements, and criteria related to environmentally sensitive sites.
Projects that meet SB 79 criteria would be considered consistent with the general plan and zoning for the purposes of AB 130, and both state laws could be used.
So, how would historic resources be treated under AB 130 using SB 79?
First, AB 130 cannot be used to demolish a historic resource listed on the historic resources inventory.
By demolish, it would mean removal of more than 50% of exterior walls with no distinction about historic features or facade elements.
So a project proposing to demolish a historic property would proceed through secret review.
With existing definition of demolition, more than 50% of exterior walls, AB 130 would not require SQL review for projects that involve demolition of 50% or less of exterior walls and significant alterations of historic resources.
If a property is not a designated landmark or located in a city landmark historic district, no historic preservation permit would be required, and there would be no other historic dis no other historic review without CECWA.
One example is the former YMCA building.
Oh, located in the downtown commercial district, listed on the National Register of Historic Places that would not be subject to review under AB 130 if significant alterations were proposed.
The other implication under AB 130 is that significant properties that are not listed in the historic resources inventory could be demolished because AB 130 provisions only include properties placed on a national, state or local historic register.
One example of this is the Sakaiwe Farmhouse, which was identified as part of the environmental review analysis for the Seely Avenue project.
This would not have occurred under AB 130, which could have exempted such a project from CEQA review.
Based on this analysis, staff has provided some options for city council consideration.
The first is to direct staff to draft a definition for demolition in the San Jose Municipal Code that would provide a narrower definition for historic resources.
This would address the otherwise wide latitude provided under AB 130 for the alteration of historic resources without actually demolishing them.
The definition could more specifically address demolition in the context of historic resources to require SEQA review for alterations to significant historic fabric.
An additional option is also to direct staff to prepare an ordinance to temporarily delay the implementation of SB 79 for historic resources to allow staff time to plan for state mandated density by developing a TOD alternative plan.
Developing an alternative plan would need resource allocation, including inclusion in the budget and potentially redistributing staff work plan priorities.
The alternative plan would not permanently exempt out historic resources, but growth could be steered away from historic properties or development standards could be adjusted around them.
The density would remain the same, but could be redistributed to still meet SB 79 statutory housing targets.
Staff also recommends continuing with the identification, evaluation, and designated designation of historic properties so that we can proactively plan for their incorporation into the city's growth and development.
And this option would also require budget allocation.
So that includes staff presentation.
We're available for questions.
Great.
Thank you.
Tony, let's go to public comment first.
Yeah, I have three cards for this item.
Brent, Triana, and Roland come on down, Mayor Council.
I'm wondering if you go back up to slide number 10.
Um, because what I want to do is to show you what a general plan looked like prior to December 2013.
Okay.
You have Highway 85, the basic cut district two in half.
The bottom half is where the VTA Light Real is where I live.
I used to be the president of neighborhood association.
Initially, the entire 32 VTA acres was only for residential.
In December 2013, this council, your predecessors, swapped the zoning with the other side of the freeway to basically turn the ISTAP also to residential.
That generated in excess of a hundred million dollars of revenues that were used to basically finance a via stadium.
And I'm asking you that you don't make the same mistake again.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good evening, everyone.
My name is Tronic Crichton, senior planner with the VTA.
Speaking on behalf of VTA with highlights of the letter that we provided on March 9th, that should be in your packets.
First VTA staff is very thankful for having been able to meet with City of San Jose staff over the past few months regarding FPS 79 and then other things such as the city's general plan for you review.
And we were recently able to meet with staff from the mayor's office.
So very thankful for that.
With that, VTA strongly encourages the city council to direct staff to work with VTA to analyze residential capacity at the VTA owned Thoronian Fanatic sites in the EIR for the general plan four-year review.
Regarding non-VTA owned land within the half mile radius of the Barrieth and Melpedith BART stations, as applicable, VTA strongly encourages adopting policies that intensify industrial and commercial densities within these areas.
These could also be pursued through the general plan four-year review, and we'll complement the substantial transit investment in these in these areas.
We look forward to working with the city moving forward.
Thank you.
Back to council.
All right, coming back to the council.
We'll start with Councilor Cohen.
All right, thank you.
Umor, I think we might have a couple more public comments.
Is that correct?
I have cars submitted for tip 10.3, and the other person for 10.2 didn't line up.
Are we doing 10-2 and 10-3 public comment combined?
We are doing 10-2 and 10-3 combined.
So let's pause for a minute.
Do we have others who wanted to speak on 10-2 or 10-3?
I have Mike and Mary just submitted cards.
Okay.
We'll give Mike and Mary, you said.
Yes.
Mike and Mary a moment to come down.
We're taking 10-2 and 10-3 together.
This is the last call.
I submitted a card earlier.
Okay, come on down.
Go ahead, Ben.
Thank you, uh Ben Leach Preservation Action Council.
Thank you to the mayor.
Thank you for staff for this uh very comprehensive um analysis of impacts to historic resources.
I want to highlight, I think a very good idea that came from uh Councilmember Mulcahy's memo.
Uh um recognizing that even among HRI properties, there are established concentrations in historic districts and conservation areas that would be um not very staff intensive to um temporarily exclude for the purposes of um watching how this rollout would impact historic resources citywide.
Uh historic districts are council designated areas that have long been prioritized for consistency of form and mass, and um that is a uh a reasonable approach.
Um we also strongly agree with continuing to invest in more preservation planning and updating the historic resources inventory, and I think stronger TOD alternative plans can come from better analysis, but for right thank you that's your time.
Next speaker.
All right, I I'm Jimmy Kogura representing uh San Jose's Japan Town.
I just want to say thank you for taking this into consideration.
Uh Japantown's definitely one of the bright spots I feel of San Jose, and we're facing a lot of different blight in the neighborhood, and it's been a lot of generations.
I've grown up around this.
I can see the financial burden for a lot of people trying to make investments here.
And you know, it's one of those things that I'm hoping the council with the wording takes it wisely and carefully.
Um I can see some ways it can maybe go a little bit too far, but I think this is the the right step.
So thank you for having this in consideration.
Have a nice day.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good afternoon.
Hi, I'm ready.
My name is Brent Van Brocklin, and I'm a TOD project manager at VTA.
I'd like to focus my comments on the Santa Teresa and Ceroni sites together.
These represent over 60 developable acres and are the two largest sites in VTA's TOD portfolio.
VCA is fully supportive of the city's desire to maintain these areas as important employment hubs, and is we are willing to commit to preserving significant space for industrial and commercial uses.
However, we believe these sites can and should accommodate mixed use development that includes housing alongside jobs.
I also want to note that the city is currently utilizing both of these sites for housing related solutions, including EIH at Syroni and safe parking program at Santa Teresa, which underscores both the feasibility of housing and the need within our community.
Given the scale and importance of these sites, we respectfully ask that council direct staff to continue working with the VTA to identify a path forward that allows for mixed use developments at these two sites.
We also encourage the city to incorporate mixed use solutions in these areas as a part of the upcoming general.
Thank you, that's your time.
Next speaker.
So I still don't know how this shit works, but I'm waiting for a call from the guy that um controls the CB California State License Board.
I'm gonna give him my card.
Do you have a card for open forum?
Huh?
Um your card is for open forum, which is not what this topic is, your Jose?
Yeah.
Yeah, so um the open forum for topics that are not on the agenda comes at the end of the meeting.
At the end of the meeting?
Yeah.
Okay.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon.
My name is Mary Ang.
I represent opportunities for change.
And I heard about this meeting 15 minutes ago.
And hence you know that I'm uh not fully prepared.
But I am here to be the voice of about a hundred men who've been part of our opportunities for change, 501c3 transitional reentry housing.
These hundred men are roughly 52% Hispanic from East LA, East LA and East San Jose.
45% black, three percent indigenous or Caucasian.
They live one block south of Valley Medical.
We provide um uh an effective support program, not because of me, but because of my two founders, and we're thrilled to be a coalition with set with San Jose here.
Uh producing productive men.
Something like 60 percent have gotten uh have um gotten promotions in the earned income jobs we give them, and we are in support of ADU-based.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Hello, Mike Sodegren Preservation Action Council.
Um first of all, I want to thank staff and uh council member Mulcahy and Council Motor Tordios who all weighed in on this particular issue.
Um anybody that's looked at at SB 79 knows that there's gonna be legal challenges, nonetheless from Los Angeles.
So we'll see if it actually starts on July 1st.
But we do think it's appropriate that the city has set its sights on getting that in so we don't have something like builder's remedy to deal with again.
Um we do so uh we encourage you not to leave an option on the table to do a temporary delay.
I would point out that the word temporary is really quite long because it's um one year past the next housing element, which by my math would be years from now.
So I would encourage you to take the recommendation that you have from staff and from your liaison with the historic landmarks commission and um move forward the memo from Councilmember Kehi.
Thank you.
Thank you, back to council.
All right, thank you.
Coming back to the council, I think I was going to Councilor Cohen first.
Thank you, Mayor, and thanks to staff for bringing this forward.
I'm I'm just going to address item 10.2.
We're we're gonna handle the motion separately.
Um thank you for uh the work to quickly bring back the um policy to help us exempt important industrial lands, a lot of which are in District 4 in North San Jose, and I appreciate um that effort.
And so um, but I just want to ask a question back to the VTA concern about Cerone.
If we can put the map back on the screen, I just want first want to find out are those circles, those circles are pretty accurate on your map in terms of what lands fall in.
It looks to me like the VTA Cerroni site is actually just outside the half mile radius.
Is that correct?
Back a couple slides, I think.
Back.
No, no, it's I'm sorry, forward.
Right there.
Yeah.
So is that that CIC land on the top is just outside the circle.
That's the VTA Cerone site.
Is that correct?
It's covered, so as long as any part of the parcels touching, then the whole parcels are.
Oh, so it's so yeah.
So because the tiny corner.
Okay, I just wanted to understand that a little bit better.
Okay.
Um, but but having said that, you know, we we're very supportive of mixed-use development in North San Jose and and considering um repurposing land for some housing and end industrial uses.
That Bay Point area where VTA Cerony is located is has a lot of housing going up, and it is appropriate to consider further housing there.
I I think that conversation should happen outside of this discussion today and and be something that we're looking at in our general plan and also just um as proposals come forward from VTA, um, just as we did at River Oaks, where we put a housing overlay there to so that they could convert what was industrial landed at River Oaks property to housing.
We should be considering the same thing up at Cerone, presumably also at Santa Teresa, although I'm not gonna uh speak on that one since it's about as far away from my district as you can get.
Um but um so I I just want to just ask uh Chris I I want to see if we have a commitment that you'll be working with VTA during the general plan process to uh uh understand what they want their long-term use of that property to be.
Yeah, absolutely.
We uh, you know, we got to have very early to start the conversations with VTA just in more broadly around impacts of SB 79, and those two sites came up relatively quickly in that conversation.
Um we've you know certainly committed to continue that conversation.
As you say, there's a great opportunity to have a really strategic look at both of those sites through the general plan process and ensure that we're maximizing those opportunities.
Okay, thank you for that.
So I will um move approval of the staff recommendation.
Thanks, Councilmember.
We'll go to Councilmember Mulkey.
Sorry.
Okay.
Was that true for you as well, Councilmember Trudias?
Okay.
So we will vote now then on item 10.2, and then we'll come back to continue the conversation about 10.3.
Tony.
Motion passes unanimously.
Okay, thank you.
Let me give colleagues a moment to put up their hands for item 10.3.
Does anybody want to kick us off?
Councilmember Mulcahy.
Thank you, Mayor.
Um, thanks to those of you who came out to testify and submitted letters to us on this item.
And as the one who raised the concerns over impacts of SB 79 on historic resources, appreciate the conversation today.
Appreciate the memo from my colleagues as well.
I don't think anybody on the Dais wants to pass policy with known unintended consequences in how the city responds to SB 79, such as limiting much needed development and or demolishing properties in our historic neighborhoods, but we do need to pick a path.
I want to say a big thank you to our planning staff.
Um so many curve balls have been sent your way, SB 79, AB 130, and all the SBs and ABs that have been coming your way.
They're complex pieces of legislation with deadlines that you've got to perform at.
So thank you so much for your effort um to get us on the road to implementing these policy directions.
So as we've discussed over the past several months, SB 79 significantly expands ministerial approvals for housing development near transit.
While AB 130 limits the applicability of CECWA, naturally that raises concerns about how these changes affect neighborhoods across San Jose, including many of our historic resource neighborhoods, not just how it might impact downtown.
Staff's analysis has shown us that many of San Jose's transit-oriented development areas contain some of the highest concentrations of historic resources in the city.
And as I noted in my January 27th memorandum, we can't rely solely on CEQA to protect those resources moving forward.
AB 130 means the city may have even fewer opportunities to evaluate impacts to historic resources through the EIR process.
We have traditionally relied on.
Because of this, it becomes even more important that we clarify our local standards, including the establishment of clear definitions, such as what constitutes demolition of a historic resource, so that the city retains consistent tools to address potential impacts as projects move forward.
I again want to acknowledge the memo from my colleagues, Councilmembers Kameh, Campos, Tordillos, and Cohen.
However, I want to clarify a few areas because I believe my memorandum was either misunderstood or perhaps taken out of context.
Their memo asks staff to conduct additional study of historic resources, framed in contrast to my proposal.
In fact, in practice, as we just heard from staff, that request would likely require significantly more staff resources while producing less immediate policy guidance.
By contrast, my memorandum asks staff to return by December 2026 with a delayed effectuation ordinance focused specifically on historic districts and conservation areas consistent with SB 79.
These areas are already known by us, identified and mapped.
They represent cohesive neighborhood scale and historic environments rather than individual buildings.
Historic districts and conservation areas differ from individual historic structures.
Their significance comes from the collective character of the neighborhood, the relationship between homes, streets, and public spaces that together create an intact historic context.
When redevelopment occurs incrementally without coordinated planning, that character can gradually erode over time, even if buildings are replaced one at a time.
Many of these districts are also located near existing or planned transit corridors, which means they could experience increased redevelopment pressure under SB 79's state mandated density provisions.
For that reason, the request in my memorandum is intentionally narrow and practical to focus on historic districts and conservation areas that the city has already identified, and to name a few Scheley, Guadalupe, Washington, Hensley, Willowglen, and possibly Palmhaven, if that's determined in the map to be within the zone of impact.
The approach in my memorandum would likely require less work from staff than the alternative proposed in the other memorandum.
The proposal directs staff to conduct a new historic resources survey across pre-World War II areas of the city.
That would involve reassessing and cataloging thousands of properties and updating inventories that have not been comprehensively reviewed in decades.
I think 2004, as you heard earlier.
By contrast, my proposal focuses on areas that the city has already identified and studied, allowing staff to develop a targeted ordinance rather than undertaking a citywide survey effort.
In district district six, I'll cite one specific example that would be impacted by SB 79, the Sheley Subdivision off the Alameda and Stockton.
Much of that neighborhood still resembles the homes built there in the late 1800s, many designed by Theodore Lenzen.
It is a cohesive historic environment, and like many historic districts across San Jose, its significance comes from the neighborhood as a whole.
As Ben Leach, executive director of PAC SJ pointed out in his letter and at the Dais, this issue does not affect the downtown core in quite the way the other memorandum suggests.
Many downtown areas are already zoned for densities that meet or exceed what SB 79 would allow.
My concern is primarily about historic neighborhoods outside of downtown, where redevelopment pressure could fundamentally alter neighborhoods that have remained intact for generations.
D6 has been a leader in building housing, particularly affordable.
I'm proud that our district demonstrates that housing can be built in many forms, from single family to high density development along major growth corridors.
Planning for housing and preserving historic neighborhoods are not and should not be considered as mutually exclusive goals.
The approach outlined in my memorandum is intended to strike a balanced path forward, one that recognizes the urgency of building more homes, while also ensuring that we do not unintentionally erode some of San Jose's most historically significant neighborhoods.
Finally, I think it's important to acknowledge that the policy landscape around these laws is still evolving.
We initially analyzed SB 79 in isolation as we later discovered with AB 130, that was not the full picture.
There will likely be additional state legislation or lawsuits that may change the context of our decisions.
Given that uncertainty, asking staff to return this December with a targeted ordinance delaying effectuation in historic districts and conservation areas is a measured and responsible step.
It allows us to continue moving forward with housing production while ensuring that the city retains clear planning tools to protect the historic neighborhoods that help divine San Jose's character and history.
With that, I motion to approve my memorandum on 10.3, which would approve staff recommendations and then also ask that staff to come back to council with a delayed effectuation ordinance by December 26 for our historic districts and conservation areas.
All right.
Thanks, Councilmember.
We'll go to Councilmember Tordios.
Thank you, Mayor, and thank you, staff for all of the research and analysis that has gone into even getting us to this point in our SB 79 implementation discussions.
And thank you also to the other members of our Brown Act and uh Councilmember Mulcahy for the thoughtful consideration of how SB 79 interacts with historic preservation.
I do want to acknowledge that the desire to protect our historic properties in San Jose is a valid goal.
The city is rich in history, and I'm proud to represent one of the districts that has the highest concentration of historic resources, many of which date back more than a century.
I also live in a historic home in a city landmark district, so I believe I have some understanding of both the nature of these neighborhoods and also their potential for supporting new infill development.
As a council, I believe we have a responsibility to drive progress towards our city's housing goals while balancing that against sometimes competing goals like historic preservation.
I think staff's uh proposal to come back with a narrower definition of demolition for historic properties under AB 130 strikes that balance well.
And I do have some concerns that going any further than that, including any sort of form of delayed effectuation, uh, has the potential to backfire and create unintended consequences that will hamstring the city in meeting our housing goals.
I think it's important to note that parts of the city that would be most impacted by such a delayed effectuation policy are the exact same parts of the city that we've previously identified as good candidates for new infill development.
Uh places that are close to our downtown core, places that are near transit and jobs, uh, neighborhoods that are walkable, well connected, and close to existing resources.
Moreover, as the council member representing some of the highest concentrations of historic communities in the city, I want to highlight that district three would be disproportionately impacted by any delayed effectuation ordinance that is targeting historic districts.
As the staff report notes, of these six transit-oriented development areas that have a high concentration of historic resources, all six of them touch district three, and five of the six are either entirely or very nearly entirely within the bounds of my district.
You know, new laws coming down from the state, as well as our own long-term planning work like the general plan.
And I want to note that during last week's presentation of the City Council focus area status report, staff actually noted that the downtown ministerial approval ordinance was delayed until Q2 of next fiscal year, in large part due to reprioritization of staff resources for state policy work, including SB 79 implementation.
So the additional staff time required to complete the delayed effectuation ordinance would risk further delaying other critical PBCE work, not just the downtown ministerial ordinance, but uh recommendations coming out of the four-year general plan task force review.
And I do not believe that pursuing a short-term delayed effectuation ordinance that's going to make it harder for us to meet our housing goals is the best use of that limited PBCE staff capacity.
Moreover, I do want to clarify that the ordinance would not actually help with all of the challenges that were called out in the staff presentation, uh, notably the uh potential impacts to unlisted eligible structures.
To the extent that those structures have not been identified, they are not within the bounds of existing historic districts.
Delaying effectuation within historic districts is not going to help protect those resources.
Whereas the direction that our memo includes to have a workload analysis for an updated historic resources survey has the potential to actually identify those resources which are not currently on the uh inventory and get them into a protected status where they will be eligible to have that higher threshold of environmental review and consideration prior to any significant alteration or demolition.
I also want to clarify that the recommendation in my memo with council members uh Kamehkohen and Campos is not to conduct a full uh you know resource uh update through this budget cycle, but to perform the workload analysis that we can be informed about how to balance those competing resource uh initiatives within PBCE and obviously our uh constrained budget at the moment.
Uh when it comes to our kind of broader approach to housing in San Jose, I'm very grateful for the work that this council has done in recent months and in recent years to promote housing production, but I think it's important that we look at all of that work in the context of our actual performance on housing.
And I think when we do that, we can see that we are still falling very far short of our housing goals.
In 2025, the city permitted 2,269 units, which comes out to just about one-third of our state mandated uh arena target of 7,775 units per year.
I'll also note that other cities have managed to integrate infill development into existing historic districts, like the Midtown District in Sacramento, a city that I'll note has built three times as many homes per capita as San Jose has in the past five years.
So for me, it's difficult to see how exempting some of our most centrally located and well connected neighborhoods from infill development for the next six years is actually going to help us earnestly move forward with our housing goals.
And since there was the discussion of staff resources, I think it's important to note that any delayed effectuation ordinance will only take uh these properties off the table until 2032 in order to protect uh our historic districts and any properties in those districts beyond that date would require staff to come back with a transit oriented development alternative plan, which looks to shift around density within the existing TOD areas.
And that becomes very complicated in the context of historic districts, because many of the historic districts in and around downtown take up a significant portion of the TOD areas.
And uh state law currently limits us to exempting 10% of the land within those TOD areas as part of any sort of TOD alternative plan.
Uh so I really struggle to see the longer term approach here to protecting wholesale districts, and I think that pursuing those TOD alternative plans would itself be a very significant burden on our city staff.
Finally, I I think it's important uh to note that any action that temporarily exempts large swaths of downtown and central San Jose from the impacts of SB 79 does raise in my mind questions of fairness for the rest of our city.
Uh and if we take developments off the table in many of these centrally located and resource rich neighborhoods, it will mean that more demand for SB 79 style info projects is going to be pushed out into our more suburban parts of the city uh into less well connected uh transit oriented development areas in places like D8, D9, and D10.
And so, with all of that said, understanding that there are different perspectives on this dais, I want to thank again everyone for the collaboration and all of the conversation.
And I would like to move uh make a substitute motion for approval of the memo written by myself and council members Cohen, Campos, and Kameh, which would approve the staff recommendation to update the definition of demolition, to provide those stronger guardrails for AB 130, and would also uh direct staff to prepare a workload analysis so that we can make an informed uh decision about any sort of future facing investment into a new historic resources survey.
Thanks, council member.
Thank you both for your comments.
I'm just pausing a moment to see if we have further discussion.
Otherwise, we'll move to a vote.
Okay, seeing none, Tony, let's vote on the motion, the substitute motion.
Motion passes 10 to 1.
With Mulkey voting no.
Okay.
So that's item 10.3.
Thank you all.
Okay.
Welcome everyone.
It's great to see a full chamber.
We're now moving on to our final agendized item.
Also, our most significant item of the day, maybe the year, item 3.3.
This is the approval of the fiscal year 2026-2027, mayor's March budget message.
I have some opening comments.
We'll also have staff in the box available to answer questions.
There's no staff presentation, as this is my annual March budget message, but I do, I will give slightly longer remarks than usual.
Before I do that, though, let me just um thank everybody for being here.
It's always great to have a full chamber.
I know we have a lot of folks here to advocate for important services and needs in the community, uh, presumably representing many different perspectives and experiences in our community, and that's something we should celebrate.
That's what a healthy democracy looks like.
When we get to public comment, I'll share a little more, and or our clerk can if I forget, on just how we can all participate fully and respectfully and make this a productive process.
Let me start though with some opening comments.
And I want to start with uh gratitude.
Uh, starting with my budget Brown Act, I want to thank Vice Mayor Pam Foley and recognize that this is her eighth and final budget cycle on this council.
So, Vice Mayor, thank you.
Thank you for your years of service and always being a voice of uh of reason and bringing all you that you do to bring people together and move us forward.
Also I want to thank uh council members Kamei Cohen and Tordillos, who were also in my budget Brown Act this year.
What that means is we're limited by law and how many colleagues we can we can speak to as we're putting forward legislation, but being able to have colleagues to discuss trade-offs with, hear feedback, incorporate you know their best ideas is really important, and um my budget Brown Act certainly made the March budget message stronger.
So just want to thank them for their engagement.
Also want to thank my team who put in countless hours, uh including through the entire weekend.
Um thank you to Stephen Keynes, who's my our chief innovation officer and budget director in the mayor's office, Keith Hertzberg, budget innovation advisor, Alejandra Lenis Chantres, acting chief policy officer in my office, of course, my chief of staff, Sarah Sarate, and the entire policy team and mayor's office for all of the work you did to get us to this point.
Uh I know it's been many, many hours over the last couple of months collaborating with city staff and and colleagues and listening to community members.
I want to thank our city manager, Jennifer McGuire, Deputy City Manager Lee Wilcox for their partnership and being really steady hands through the initial planning for what will be a difficult fiscal year, a year in which we are closing a significant deficit.
So I want to recognize that City Manager McGuire took proactive action early to do everything possible to lessen the impact on our workforce and our residents as we head into leaner years.
We know our economy is cyclical, therefore our revenue is cyclical.
Unfortunately, our costs don't tend to be so cyclical.
They tend to just kind of keep going up every year, uh, though we do our best to manage those responsibly.
And then the city manager's budget office, led by Jim Shannon, supported by Bonnie Young, Claudia Chang, and many other members of the budget office who provide real expertise and guidance, and also we're available nights and weekends to my team and uh and me, and I really appreciate that.
And then all council colleagues who um are participating fully in the process, number of thoughtful memos and a lot of good engagement.
So I'm looking forward to the conversation.
Um, my actual opening remarks um, good afternoon, council colleagues.
I would like to introduce item 3.3, my March budget message for fiscal year 26-27.
As required by our city charter, this message provides initial policy direction to guide the city manager in preparing the proposed budget that will come before us for deliberation in May.
As a council, it's important that we strike a balance between providing clear and direct guidance and also ensuring that the city manager has ample space to find creative ways of resolving our projected deficit.
It's vital that we all acknowledge this year that we are facing a $56 million shortfall.
And once resolved, we are still projecting a further $28 million shortfall.
And as I've mentioned, uh, while we do overall have a six billion dollar budget, so I want to put that in perspective, and our general fund is quite a bit smaller, about one and a half billion.
This is still a very meaningful number, and it's driven by the fact that our revenues are slowing down.
Our property and sales tax revenue growth is slowing, just as we continue to have rising costs in terms of labor and other service core services we've committed to.
So today, with a vote on this message, we will set the framework for how we align our resources, our available resources, with the priorities our residents have consistently told us matter most.
Safer neighborhoods, cleaner public spaces, more housing that people can afford, a stronger local economy, and responsible stewardship of limited taxpayer dollars.
Over the past few years, this council has worked hard to sharpen our focus around these priorities, and we're seeing progress.
But we're also facing real constraints, fiscal pressures, rising costs, and growing service demand.
So the goal of this year's budget direction is simple.
Stay focused on what works, protect services utilized by residents and vulnerable communities, invest in results, resist the desire to add new unsustainable programs, and make disciplined decisions that protect the city's long-term financial health.
I think it's important to note that public trust has significantly strengthened in recent years as we have focused on these core community needs.
In fact, trust in City Hall and our annual community survey is up 40, nearly 40 percent in the last four years.
I think it's important that we take heed of that progress, the feedback from residents, and ensure that the FY, the fiscal year 2627 March message continues to build upon this momentum, which has been driven by focus.
So I want to take a moment to outline our areas of focus in a little more detail for all of you who did not make it through the 40 page budget message.
First, we must continue to make our neighborhoods safer and cleaner.
Public safety is the foundation of a thriving city.
Our police department is doing remarkable work with a lean workforce, protecting a city of more than one million residents with fewer than 1,000 street ready officers.
We need to continue to support them with the tools, technology, and staffing strategies that allow them to be effective and efficient.
At the same time, we know that safety is about more than enforcement alone.
It also means investing in prevention, particularly programs that serve young people and connect them with education, mentorship, and job opportunities.
These investments help reduce crime before it starts and strengthen the long-term well-being of our community.
Clean and well-maintained neighborhoods are also essential to residents' sense of safety and pride.
Over the last year, our teams have removed tens of millions of pounds of trash from encampments, creeks, and public spaces, expanded beautification efforts, increased enforcement against graffiti, chronic blight, and illegal dumping.
This work matters.
It improves, we've seen an 18% reduction in graffiti on public land.
It improves quality of life and helps restore confidence that City Hall is responsive to residents' concerns.
Next, we must continue making progress on reducing unsheltered homelessness, which consistently ranks as our constituents' number one priority every year.
In 2019, going back about six years now, San Jose had one of the highest rates of per capita unsheltered homelessness in the country.
Nearly 85% of our homeless neighbors were living outside.
And we had hardly anywhere to refer these individuals to come indoors.
Since then, we have invested in new and expanded interim housing and shelter, deep collaboration across our city departments and with our nonprofit, nonprofit, and philanthropic partners to deliver meaningful results.
Today the city operates over 2,000 shelter placements across interim housing, safe parking, and safe sleeping, including 1,000 new placements opened since the start of 2025.
Over the same time, unsheltered homelessness has dropped dramatically.
By the last count, we had reduced unsheltered homelessness by well over 20%.
With the that that was before the 1,000 new placements.
We think with our next count will be over a third, maybe closer to a 40% reduction.
And we will have reached a point where a majority of our homeless neighbors are living indoors, not outdoors on our streets and in our public spaces.
Last year, this new interim housing system served 2,135 people coming out of encampments, of which 70% remain indoors with access to supportive services.
Of those who exited, roughly 30% secured permanent affordable housing, 30% transitioned to another sheltered destination, 8% entered institutional settings, and 7% secured unsubsidized permanent housing.
Our strategy now must shift from system expansion to system optimization, strengthening collaboration with other agencies, particularly the county, to ensure clients are accessing services and support needed to move toward permanent housing and self-sufficiency.
At the same time, we must continue restoring heavily impacted public spaces, particularly along waterways and key commercial corridors, while ensuring that outreach and referral systems are working together more effectively.
The direction in this budget message asks the city manager to continue refining those efforts, measure outcomes carefully, and prioritize approaches that deliver the greatest impact for the resources we invest.
Third, we must build more housing.
Housing affordability remains one of the top concerns for residents across San Jose.
Nearly half of renters and homeowners in our city are spending more than 30% of their income on housing.
If we want a city where working families can stay, where young people can build a future, and where seniors can age in place, we must increase housing supply and remove unnecessary barriers to building.
This budget message calls for continued work to streamline approvals, increase transparency around development fees, and ensure that projects that meet our zoning and planning rules can move forward without unnecessarily unnecessary delay and cost.
It also asks staff to explore ways to reduce costs for affordable housing and create new pathways to home ownership for first-time buyers.
Fourth, we must strengthen our economy by revitalizing downtown and our key business districts.
Downtown San Jose is beginning to regain momentum as a destination for culture, dining, entertainment, and innovation.
Events earlier this year have already brought hundreds of thousands of visitors into the city's core, filling our hotels and supporting small businesses.
Councilmember Ortiz brought forward an innovative proposal titled The East Side Revitalization Plan, which aims to leverage philanthropic dollars to support businesses and organizations on the East Side and support their long-term health.
That is included in this message.
But we know there is more work to do.
This budget direction includes evaluating programs that support business activity, exploring strategic infrastructure investments, and continuing efforts to attract employers and visitors.
We also want to maintain our three business outreach roles that provide valuable services to our business improvement districts and to our large employers.
And finally, we must maintain strong fiscal discipline.
San Jose has been recognized for responsible financial management, and we must continue that tradition.
The reality is that we are operating in a constrained fiscal environment.
Revenues are not keeping pace with all of the needs and expectations placed on our city government.
That means we must make careful choices.
We should prioritize investments that produce measurable results, address deferred infrastructure needs, and leverage technology or partnerships to deliver services more efficiently.
It also means avoiding ongoing commitments without reliable funding sources.
Balancing our budget is required by law, but good stewardship goes beyond balancing the books.
It means ensuring that every dollar we spend advances the priorities of our residents and protects the long-term stability of our city.
In response to my March budget message this year, the members of the council authored four memos, which included 30, I'm sorry, 63 unique pieces of direction.
We're in an unusual year with a large deficit, and we are introducing an abnormal, I'd say actually unprecedented amount of direction via responsive memos.
My team in the mayor's office wanted to ensure these items each received an independent evaluation.
And we worked through the weekend.
Again, I want to say a huge thank you to my team for uh dropping everything over the entire weekend to work tirelessly to produce the reconciliation memo you have in your agenda.
Thank you to the city manager's office for making themselves available to answer our questions and help us understand the various resource and staff limitations so we could make clear in this reconciliation memo what can be done with the resources available or through existing work plans and where trade-offs need to be made if certain items advance.
Their responses to our questions assisted us in developing the document before you today.
This memo includes an appendix that separates each piece of direction by council member author, states whether it should be integrated into the budget message, provides a rationale for this disposition, and also includes additional context or amended language as appropriate.
My sincere hope is that this reconciliation memo will help us traverse the discussion today more effectively and efficiently and in a more informed way.
Regarding the proposal to explore expanding mobile home parks to include residents living in RVs, the reconciliation memo accepts the recommendation from the group memo to strike this item.
We have also taken out the Ellis Act proposal, and we have accepted Councilmember Campos's single author memo proposal with modifications to set clear and reasonable expectations about the next steps needed to convert one brand lane into permanent affordable or supportive housing, which has long been the long-term goal and will take some time to execute, but is a very worthy goal.
So, colleagues, this March budget message is intended to guide the next phase of our work.
It reflects the priorities we have heard from our community and the progress we've made together over the past several years.
Thank you again to the council, our city manager and her team, our city workforce for your partnership in this ongoing process of holding ourselves accountable to deliver the greatest possible impact for our residents.
I'm looking forward to the discussion today and continuing our work together as we prepare the proposed budget in the months ahead.
So with that, uh and before I open up the discussion to my colleagues, we are going to go to public comment.
And as I promised, I would say just a few things on that.
So these bigger items where we're talking about really important trade-offs can elicit a lot of emotion, a lot of feeling, and that's reasonable at the same time.
We have a few hundred people here today who would like to be heard.
Couple of ground rules.
Number one, if you have a sign, please do not hold it up in blood in a way that blocks anyone behind you or around you.
Everybody deserves to be able to fully participate in the meeting.
Along with that concept, we take people's first amendment speech rights very seriously.
At any given moment, there should only be one person speaking.
Who has their time to share their perspective?
No booing, no cheering, no just keep your opinions to yourself as they walk back to their seat.
If you want to show support with your silent jazz hands, that is highly encouraged.
But uh, we need to keep the meeting going.
If you are disrupting the meeting, even booing or cheering, you'll be given a warning, and if it continues, you will be asked to leave the chamber and you will be removed from council chambers so we can maintain an orderly meeting and make sure we hear from folks who have taken a lot of time today to be here to express their speech rights and their opinions.
Tony will be managing public comment.
I think that more or less covers it.
Tony, how many cards, how many speakers do you believe we have?
I have 150.
Okay.
So with 150, we will uh we'll go to 45.
We've been at a minute.
I think we'll go to 45 seconds to try to get out of here at a reasonable time today.
And we'll keep you updated as we get.
We may get additional cards.
Sometimes the way this works is we will get we may get 50 or 100 more over the course of the process.
So we are going to continue.
By the way, you can also reach each of us through the city website at our council office emails, as I hope you all know.
Okay, I'm gonna ask folks to quiet down so Tony can call the first public commenters down to the podium.
Yes, I'm gonna call about five to seven names to start.
The names will also appear in the captioning over here.
Um I will do my best to call the names correctly.
The timer is over on the left.
Um, I want to just add to the whole like jazz hands and cheering.
Um, there are 150 speakers currently, we'll probably have 200 total at least.
That's one of the reasons we don't want you to cheer is that we want the people who are waiting for a really long time to be able to get up here quicker, and so we want to keep it moving, not because we don't want to hear you, but we want to make sure everybody gets to stay here the whole time and say what they want to say.
So that's my piece.
I'm gonna call the first few names.
I have Ed Davis, Anil Babar, Leah Tennisgetter, Yesenia, Yasenia Campos, Julian Lake, and Cecile Madrigan.
Come on down.
And it you don't have to speak in the order that you're called.
Uh good afternoon, council and mayor.
Uh, despite the economic challenges and their projected shortfall in the budget, maintaining core city services and addressing the overall operations of the city are important, and that's why I support the mayor's budget message.
But I'm also here today to address the memo authored by council members campus, Casey, Done, Ortiz, and Candelas in particular.
I appreciate the authors for raising the awareness of the difficulties when it comes to navigating the code enforcement department.
However, the memo calls for penalizing property owners for the difficult their for the difficulties in the system in navigating a complex system, which is wrong.
The mayor's member rightly instead suggests allowing staff to continue their work and addressing those challenges.
And the California Apartment Association is ready to partner to aid in this process.
Thank you.
Perfect.
Thank you.
Before the next speaker, Mayor, did you want to make an announcement?
Okay, thanks.
Uh Tony.
I can do that when we come back.
I did just also I was remiss, I missed my notes here.
Really important for everybody to understand this is the beginning of the process.
We also have budget study sessions.
The city managers proposed much budget in May, and then a June budget message with a full public hearing the day before the actual budget vote in June.
So I just I also want folks to know that while we have we're gonna have a couple hundred speakers and try to move through it officially today.
It is certainly not the last opportunity to weigh in on this message.
We'll have a full public hearing that typically goes four or five hours when we get to June as we get closer to actually voting on next year, next fiscal year's budget.
So just wanted to make sure everybody had that context.
I'm sorry, go ahead.
Thank you.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council members.
My name is Yacenia Campos.
I was born and raised here in San Jose.
I'm a responder with the Rapid Response Network, a Chispana Latina Coalition of Silicon Valley, a commissioner of the Race and Health Disparities Board, and a proud daughter of Mexican immigrants.
This city is my home and my commitment runs deep.
And now my community is targeted and vulnerable.
I don't speak from fear, but from experience.
In October of last year, I was detained by ICE outside the ISAP office in South San Jose while legally observing their detention of members of the community that you represent who were loaded into vans and take it away.
Fear, uncertainty in their eyes.
These are lifelines.
Please do not scale back.
San Jose must remain a place for all families to live in.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor and City Council.
On behalf of the Bay Area Council, which represents almost 400 businesses and organizations around the Bay Area, I want to thank you for this budget and express our strong support for the priorities it outlines for San Jose.
We strongly support the budget's commitment to public safety, uh fighting homelessness and innovation and economic development in the region.
In particular, uh the emphasis on reducing homelessness by expanding and optimizing interim housing, which has achieved significant progress, reducing homelessness by 33% since 2019.
By contrast, the state saw a 13% increase during the same window.
The Barry Council thanks uh the city council and the mayor for this effort, and uh best of luck.
Thank you.
Next speaker, I'd also like to call Eric Nigam Negomir, Jiyang Fan, and Larry Ames.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council members.
Leah Tennisder, President and CEO of our San Jose Chamber of Commerce.
Economic development is really the core driver of city revenue.
Cost control and necessary cuts are immediate actions, but long-term fiscal health is going to depend on growing our economy.
That's going to require more housing delivered faster and at lower cost.
We support streamlining permitting, reducing regulatory barriers, rethinking fees, including deferring until occupancy and moving towards more predictable structures.
A safe and clean and well-managed city is the foundation of our strong economy.
Continued progress on public safety and homelessness directs directly supports residents, businesses, and vibrant business districts.
We have significant opportunity with the sports and entertainment economy, and feel like if we can focus on this full ecosystem, we'll continue to drive revenue.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor Mahan and Council members.
My name is Cecile Medriaga, and I work for Silicon Valley Leadership Group.
And I'm here today both in that capacity and as a longtime San Jose resident of 36 years.
This city is home to me and my family.
And like many many residents, I care deeply about keeping San Jose safe, vibrant, and full of opportunity.
I recognize the difficult budget decisions before you, and I appreciate the responsibility you carry.
The mayor's budget message offers a strong framework, and I respectfully encourage your alignment with that approach.
Thank you for your time and for your service to our city.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.
My name is Orlena Mejia, the president of Lone Bluff Center Neighborhood Association.
I'm here to support the direction outlined in the Mayor's March budget message.
Over the past few years, we've seen real progress in areas residents care about, especially around reducing homelessness, improving public safety, cleaning up neighborhoods, and supporting new housing.
I encourage the council to support this framework and continue working towards a balanced budget that protects essential services while keeping San Jose moving forward.
Thank you for your time and work on behalf of our community.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
I'd also like to call down Larry Whitaker and Elaine Mawid.
Go ahead.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council members.
My name is Ian Fan.
I'm the SVP from Silicon Valley Leadership Group and also runs the Institute for California AI policy.
We support Mayor's budget message because it recognizes the critical importance of continued growth in San Jose's innovation economy.
AI, other emerging technologies and advanced manufacturing are the cornerstones of our local economy and offer immerse future potential.
We must ensure San Jose remains the top choice for the world's most innovative companies.
Mayor Mahan's budget message takes the right approach.
We urge your support and thank you for your time.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Mayor, Council members, thank you for uh be here.
My name is Eric Nagamir, like my colleagues you just heard from.
I work for the Silicon Valley Leadership Group.
We represent over 80 member companies, including global technology leaders, research institutions, and service providers.
We support this budget message because it protects and promotes San Jose's business competitiveness.
Robust housing options, modern infrastructure, and a safe, clean city form the foundation for attracting businesses and workers to San Jose.
We want to recognize the city's hard work in recent years and ask that you continue to prioritize these areas as recommended in the mayor's budget proposal.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Larry Ames, longtime park advocate.
Your challenge is to balance the city budget, but please don't do it at the expense of city parks.
Parks are invitable or vital to making San Jose a livable city.
As we address our housing shortage by building condos and apartments and by filling in existing backyards with ADUs, our city parks will have to serve as the backyards for our new residents.
The city's park maintenance budget was cut after the 2001 dot-com bust.
And then again after the 2008 Great Deep Recession, and then after the pan COVID pandemic, please don't cut it yet again.
On the list of California's 15 largest cities, San Jose comes in dead last in terms of park maintenance funds over and just one-third of the over median average budget.
Please do not cut the budget anymore.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker, Sam Ho and Lynn Vu also come on down.
Good afternoon, Mr.
Mayor, members of the City Council.
Louis Powell, Executive Director, Santa Maria Urban Ministry, uh proudly serving working families and newcomers to our city, as well as people experiencing homelessness since 1983.
We know there's no single solution to homelessness.
And we know that the earlier we intervene and the more broadly we reach, the better the outcome, both fiscally and emotionally for our city and for our families.
When prevention, stabilization, and housing work together, families stay housed, children stay in schools, and we spend less money.
So when government works, it helps working people achieve their full potential in the next speaker.
Madam Baseminer and Council.
My name is Larry Whitaker, and I live in District 9.
I'm here today to speak in support of the mayor's March budget message.
The city should rebid contracts for the interim housing and shelter system so we can reduce the operating costs and make the system more efficient.
As a San Jose resident who cares about ending unsheltered homelessness, I am asking that you vote for the mayor's budget message in full.
Thank you.
Happy St.
Patrick's Day.
Thank you.
I'd like to call Vasundara Tatamedi, Gary Cooper.
Hong Kow and Tin Cao.
Please come on down.
Go ahead.
Thank you.
Hello, my name is Alan Lloyd, president of the VP Community Association in District 2.
We support the entirety of the mayor's budget message.
Public safety is the foundation of everything we want this city to be.
San Jose has earned its reputation as one of the safest big cities in the country.
And that's the result of disciplined leadership and smart use of resources.
As a technologist who uses AI in my everyday work, I can personally vouch for how it creates real efficiency by taking time-consuming tasks off people's lives or plates.
Right now, SJPD officers spend roughly 5,000 hours a month on reports.
AI assisted report writing would reduce that time by up to 65% and put them back in the neighborhoods where they can best serve.
Thank you very much.
Thank you, next speaker.
I'm too short.
Hi, good afternoon.
My name is Lin Wu.
I'm the representative for my uncle, the Kim Hung jury.
It bin Rob.
Everybody knows about it.
And I would like to come here today to say that please have some uh issue with the safety, public safety in San Jose in number one, and number two, it's the homeless.
I still see a lot of homeless.
And when I meet the new people, I invite them to San Jose.
They say, uh no, because your city is still a lot of homeless around, and then it's not safe to come.
So I don't want to hear any word from any stranger from the outside country or everybody say that things about in homeless uh and uh safety in San Jose.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good afternoon, thank you very much, Mayor Maehan, uh, Vice Mayor Foley and Council members, as well as our city leadership.
We uh want to come here to say thank you, thank you for great leadership you guys have been providing over the last years.
Homelessness is less, affordable housing is more.
And uh our small businesses are thriving better.
Uh great GTC uh conference going on, thousands of people in our city, and all these things happening and blight, we are cleaner city.
Thank you.
It's working.
Keep focusing on those five major issues and spend every dime we can to take care of our city because in order for us to have a safe city, we must have all those working together at the same time.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker, Felicia Mute Ho and Agarval Ranu.
Come on down.
Go ahead.
Hi, uh, my name is Hong Kau.
Good afternoon.
Um, mayor and the castle member.
I'm Hong Kow.
I'm retired Shival Junior and also the for six year resident of San Jose.
I'm very proud to be city uh citizen, and uh, we understand you know building housing is uh the key issue for the city.
Uh by building the house, the city can generate the income and also you know we can rezone the crisis of the housing and biding so the city needs to simplify the process also to make sure the certain fee will be applied for the housing development, and I earn up you of the council member to support the mayor message of the budget.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council Member.
I am Deacon Netho from the Diocy of San Jose.
I live in DC City for 47 years.
And today I come here to speak in support of the mayor Mark Budget.
I support Mad Mahan Homelessness.
But stopping homelessness before it start your cost effective measure to keep people off the street.
And of the government to keep more families houses.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Um, I'd also like to call Viru Vupala, Prasad Manjina, and David Burkhart.
Come on down.
Go ahead.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.
My name is Dinka District 2.
I'm here to support um Mayor Budget Message.
We are glad the county is doing its part.
The city should better integrate its interim housing system with the county coordinated entry system.
Show more people can move into permanent housing first.
In full thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.
My name is Ranu Agirwal, and I'm a resident of Waterford Park in District 2.
I'm here today to speak in support of the mayor's March budget message.
And I'm doing so because to me, this budget message represents a sensible, smart and responsive approach to the right mix of priorities in our city.
For me particularly, what is striking in this budget message is that it recognizes recognizes and there is a cognizance of the mutually supportive relationship between the priorities of more housing, effect efficient shelter system, clean neighborhoods, public safety, and economic growth.
To illustrate this point, in my own neighborhood, we were faced with decline in neighborhood cleanliness with litter on the sidewalk and sanitation concerns.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Kaelin Katamori, come on down, Herb Bowen, Melissa Lopez, Vencott Matapati, and Josephine Caruso.
Go ahead.
Hello, my name is Felicia Martinez.
I am a youth fellow with the Young Women's Freedom Center.
I'm here today to strengthen and stand in strong support of building Moxa.
Often our neighborhoods are stigmatized, overlooked, and underestimated.
When resources are taken away from our communities, it's our young people who feel it the most.
Spaces like Moxa essential because they give young people a safe space to grow, to go to grow and feel a sense of belonging.
When young people lack safe spaces and guidance, the response they often receive from society is punishment rather than support.
But what our youth need, our youth don't need more punishment.
They need investment care opportunity to thrive.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Um I don't have people lining up, so I'm gonna call a bunch of new names.
Sal Caruso, Ramesh Khonda, Ram Dota, Vijaya Asouri, Greg Koopman, Margie, Sam Lum, Steve Gann, Mary Wynne, Brian Kurtz.
I see movement.
Go ahead and speak.
I can't I got my time.
You got your time.
Uh good afternoon.
Mayor, council, uh, herbone pushing the San Jose neighborhood cert in our CERC community.
Uh I'm concerned about some cutbacks, but I've got some uh commitments by some of the council members to help our organization build out our neighborhoods.
Uh, we'll be working with the all district group, Greg Peck and that group to start getting more neighborhoods set up and prepared.
So we'll need a little funding, and I'm hoping, Miss McGuire, you can help us maybe get some time or 501c3s can help you with the budget and get through some stuff.
So waiting for that meeting.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker, Lisa Doyle, Veronica Gowie, Alicia Zamud Zamudio, Alydia Venegas, and Amilda Bueno come on down.
Go ahead.
Hello, Mayor and Council.
I'm Steve Cann.
I live in the Cambrian area that borders Almaden near the Guadalupe Creek.
And I can't point to any hard numbers of the number of homeless that used to commute from that creek area off onto uh Blossom Hill, but I I've noticed zero come out of there, so I suspect that the program currently is working and uh the efforts to stop the homeless people from living in those areas.
Uh I'm in support of the mayor's budget, and why there's a shortfall on the horizon.
This seems to be a common sense approach, and uh I hope it passes.
It seems to be fair for all.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hello, Mayor and Council.
My name is Sam, and I'm president of the Hamilton Place Neighborhood Association in District 6.
I'm here today to speak in support of the mayor's March budget message.
My neighbors and I are intimately familiar with the consequences of long wait list to PSH in San Jose and the impact it has on our parks.
We recommend the following four items for consideration in the first draft of the budget.
The city should pilot a community paramedicine program for field treatment.
We recommend inclusion of funding for the SJPD bike and trails patrol.
San Jose should better integrate its interim housing system with the county's coordinated entry system.
Please do not cut the parks and recreations budget.
Vote yes on the mayor's budget message.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hello, my name is Greg Koopman.
I was born and raised in San Jose.
When I was young, I was addicted and homeless and felt helpless until somebody reached out and gave me a chance.
Still, others today can't get work right here in San Jose because they have no address.
Coincidentally, today marks 30 years of me being in my home.
I'm so grateful.
In the past few years, I can see that San Jose is safer and cleaner.
Most of all, I feel better knowing that many of our unhoused mentally ill and addicted citizens are coming indoors as this is becoming San Jose's priority.
Support Mayor Mayhan's March budget message.
This continues the progress that he has put into this wonderful city.
Keep the focus on what's thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Mayor, Council members, good afternoon.
Brian Kurtz, San Jose Downtown Association, and D3 resident.
SJDA submitted a letter providing substantial support for 15 directives in the mayor's message and the subsequent memos.
I thank each of you for the marathon and the work that has gone into this process thus far.
We equally appreciate the more than 25 direct downtown references and the dozen plus other inclusions that will directly support downtown San Jose, from stitching districts to sports entertainment, pressing needs that exist in community safety, behavioral health, each support economic development in our community.
That it has the potential to be.
Thanks to all the workshops and certifications, I've had an early childhood education.
I am here to show my strong support for maintaining the same level of commitment to the children and youth services plan as a child care provider.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
I see firsthand how the no wrong door approach helps connect families in our community.
Thank you for your time, next speaker.
And mayor, uh my name is Margie.
I was a resident at Brandon Lane, and I'm speaking on behalf of all the clients and residents that has been experienced very unprofessionalism there.
Um my proposal is for you guys to pull the funding from that program because it's very unprofessional living there.
I've been called races by the staff, and I have gone over and beyond and end up getting kicked out.
I have never done anything to do drugs or alcohol or anything.
I always helped my fellow residents with food to having gas money to go to work and stuff like that.
Um it's heartbreaking that uh, you know, you live at this place thinking that.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Mayor Mayhan, Council members, good afternoon.
My name is Veronica Goey.
I'm the executive director of Grail Family Services.
I represent the Mayfair Pocaway demonstration site responsible for the implementation of the Children Youth Services Master Plan.
Together, city, county, nonprofit agencies, and the community have invested in this project to ensure that systems work with families, not against them.
We strongly support the joint memo from Councilmember Candelas Car Campos, Ortiz, Duan and Casey.
Prioritizing youth investment is not only a social equity issue, but also a strategic economic and community development decision for the city's future.
Thank you very much.
Thank you, next speaker.
And the person who just passed me know the answer is yes.
Go ahead.
I am a graduate of the ABC Jobs to Grow program of Gray Family Service in the community of Madrid in East San Jose.
I am currently in the process of opening my own business in.
Thanks to my strong support and continued commitment to the city's Master Plan of Services for Children and Youth.
Investing in young families through the Maestro Plan helps strengthen our communities and create opportunities.
My name is Brenda Arenas, community navigator for Gray Family Services and resident of the Mayfair community.
I have worked for over 20 years directly with the community and participants of the Jobs to Grow program through case management, helping them connect with essential resources.
The master plan has had a great impact on the lives of our families.
My community members.
Well, I am a graduate of the ABC Jobs to Grow program of Gray Family Services of the East San Jose community.
I am here to show my strong support and maintain the same level of commitment.
I have the Child Care Services Master Plan.
The proposed half million dollars some represents 50% of the original investment by young families through the Master Plan.
To help and strengthen our community and create opportunities for families in East San Jose.
Thank you very much for your time as a mayor, Vice Mayor, Council members.
I'm my name is Issa Edge Laurie.
I'm president of Safe for San Jose.
I'm also the chair of the CAC for number one Branham, EIH.
We had nearly 100 emails written in to support of Councilmember Campos' memo.
We basically are only gonna have a couple speakers to save time, but I hope you take the time and read those emails that came in.
And I'm here in person to support Councilmember Campos memo as written as permanent housing is expedited if possible.
I know there's some hoops, John.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Mayor Mahan, uh Council members, Milton Cadena here with Catholic Charities, the Senior Services.
As a concerned San Jose resident and community worker, I urge you to find and prioritize some funding for the senior health and wellness services, fully aligning with the recommendations of the senior citizen commission.
It's squarely in our city's best interest to be a senior-friendly community.
This vital program suffer very low cost prevention against isolation, depression, and chronic illnesses that plague our aging population.
The benefits multiply healthier seniors, strengthened family units, enabling caregivers to contribute economically, boosting the local spending and reducing health care burdens.
Please fund and find some funding for health and wellness services in San Jose.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon.
My name is Linda Phillips, and I'm with SourceWise, the nonprofit and area agency on aging to Santa Clara County.
I urge the council to invest in critical preventative health and wellness services for older adults.
Funds currently support our health insurance counseling and advocacy program, providing free unbiased Medicare education and 101 counseling.
Funds pay for a part-time bilingual Spanish speaking counselor.
Today we are seeing an increase in demand for counseling services due to a growing aging population and federal changes to Medical and Medicare redeterminations impacting thousands of older adults who may no longer qualify or will lose financial assistance.
Please continue to ensure that older adults can access the care that they need.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Go ahead.
Tanya Payapelli, Cassandra Mahana, and Amanda Flores come on down.
Go ahead.
Good afternoon, Mary Mahan and Council members.
These programs support seniors, many who are low-income, isolated, or limited English proficient in staying healthy, connected, and independent.
Our programs like Kenco Living Series and the Enhanced Fitness Program are not just classes and services, they're lifelines.
Without them, many seniors will lose access to central care that they can afford elsewhere.
I'll keep this short.
So just please, I please uh ask prioritize older adult health and wellness funding for the upcoming budget.
Thank you very much.
Have a great day.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good afternoon.
Georgia Basile, Directing Attorney of Senior Adults, Legal Assistance or Salah.
We provide free legal services to San Jose residents, 60 or older.
We target clients that are low income or at risk of abuse, housing instability, or loss of independence.
Our funding from this uh grant supports our services at nine senior nutrition sites, including Alma, Camden, Cyprus, Eastside, John 23rd, Mayfair, Roosevelt, South Side, and Willow Glen, and we thank you for that.
We address a range of matters impacting our clients' lives like problems with social security, clients that are facing eviction or displacement, or clients that are victims of elder abuse.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mr.
Mayor, Ms.
Vice Mayor, and all of the councilman.
My name is Bao Chiu.
I am the executive director for Vivo, the Vietnamese front reformism.
I would like to echo all of the speakers before me asking the council to reconsider reinstalling the program for the seniors, the owner adults.
It has been a tremendous uh beneficial uh program for all of us, especially in vivo.
We offer the senior to get come together to get together to come out of isolation to be together, avoid loneliness, and most uh importantly, avoid depression and which may lead to uh suicide.
So I would like the council and to reconsider.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Brenda Bell Brown, Linda Hutchins Knowles, and Yann Trong.
Come on down.
Honorable Mayor and Council members.
My name is Tanya Bayapoli.
I am the CEO of Breathe California, and I commend you on your work in keeping San Jose clean and very welcoming.
But I'm also concerned about the older adult health and wellness program being completely eliminated.
Over the past eight years, we are um we have served over 10,000 senior adults and kept them outside the ER, um, prevented lung diseases through our critical breathing exercise programs, lung health screenings, and even prevented lung cancer, maybe uh by bringing them early to um hospitals.
So I would like you to reconsider and re-evaluate um the funding for the older adult health and thank you.
Next speaker good afternoon, Mayor and Council.
My name is Cassandra Magania, and I'm here representing West Valley Community Services.
San Jose is facing a serious affordability crisis, and our budget must reflect that reality.
Housing stability must be the foundation of our investments if we want to keep our communities intact.
We support the memo from Council members Ortiz, Candelas, Campo, Stoan, and Casey, along with the priorities outlined by the real coalition state framework.
Preventing homelessness must be central to this strategy strategy.
It is more humane and far less expensive than responding after someone loses their home.
That means expanding eviction prevention, strengthening homeless prevention system, and ensuring families can stay housed before we before reaching crisis.
We also support the want to highlight working families, housing and funding for children, youth and family master plan.
Okay, thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hello and good afternoon, Mayor and Council members.
My name is Amanda Flores, and I'm community organizer working with Cassandra at West Valley Community Services, and we all facilitate our lived experience advisory committee.
And we continue to remain concerned that the mayor's budget message continues to center San Jose's homelessness strategy on the emergency interim housing system.
This system has required hundreds of million dollars in capital and operating costs while permanent housing production has not kept pace.
Prioritizing interim housing creates an ongoing budget burden and cannot solve the housing crisis on its own.
The message calls for optimizing current strategies but optimizing approaches that are not producing durable housing outcomes that will not resolve this crisis.
San Jose should focus more on resources, on strategies and on demonstrate.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Brenda Bell Brown, West Valley Community Services.
To make California forum livable for everybody, we ask that we stop using public monies to support unincorporated areas that corporations repay relief funds granted during the pandemic, and that we develop a unique stream of charge and taxation for all offshore concerns, benefiting greatly from California-based interest.
I am also concerned about proposals to reduce interim housing costs through resident fees or shared responsibility models.
Charging fees is particularly disconcerting.
The city should prioritize strategies to help residents stabilize financially and move into permanent housing.
I thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
I'm I'm Wyan Trung of D6 with Mothers Out Front.
Please maintain climate smart's current levels of staffing and funding so that staff can continue to apply for grants, especially for equity.
Heat waves are intensifying faster than science can't predicted.
We need to fund balcony solar and wind turbines to reduce cooling costs for our most vulnerable low-income residents.
Mitigations help reduce cost of living for as our food, medical, and now gas costs continue to rise out of control.
With climate impacts accelerating, we must also accelerate our thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon.
I'm Linda Hutchins Knowles with Mothers Out Front Silicon Valley.
We sent a letter in.
I won't repeat it.
I want to begin by a quote by something one of you said two years ago.
Who said this?
We were the first major city to pledge to be carbon neutral by 2030.
And SJCE is keeping us on track with innovative partnerships that ensure clean and reliable power, generate economic growth, and ensure our low-income neighbors are not left behind.
Who said that?
That was you, Mayor Mahan, in the news release celebrating the five years of SJCE.
We agree with you, Mayor Mahan.
We mothers and allies, as well as the 209 residents who signed the petition submitted to you from Silicon Valley Youth Climate Action.
Unfortunately, our city is no longer on track to reach carbon neutrality by 2030.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Hi, my name is Lisa Doyle.
I'm a resident near one Brandon Lane.
I support Council Member Council Member Campos Memo joining the about 100 community members who also submitted emails supporting the transition of one brand of lane to permanent low-income housing for the 55 and up community.
I speak on half of the neighborhoods surrounding one brand on behalf of the neighborhood surrounding one brand of lane when I say we should sincerely appreciate an expedited change in operator and approval process so our quality of life, public safety, and property values can be restored.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Mayor Man, City Council members, Ed Davis, the chair of uh San Jose Chamber of Commerce.
I was called earlier and ran late, so here I go.
Uh good afternoon.
Uh we're in support of item 3.3 in the mayor's proposed budget.
Downtown is still carrying the weight of job losses in key sections and reduced investment, but we also know that what works keeping the area safe, clean, and welcoming, accelerating housing, adaptive reuse, and supporting the small businesses that anchor the street level activity.
Continued progress on homelessness reduction and the stronger behavior health coordination is essential to restoring confidence of workers, residents, and visitors.
We should protect the services that maintain downtown's clean cleanliness and safety streamlining, permitting to uh bring new housing and retail online faster and priority.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Hi, I'm Jeff Levine, a resident of the Roosevelt Park neighborhood in District 3.
I'm here today to support Mayor Mark Mayor's March budget message.
I acknowledge that the projected budget deficit will require difficult decisions.
However, I urge the council to remain focused on the priorities that affect all residents of San Jose.
My primary concern is community safety.
I encourage the city to pursue a modern effective approaches to support our emergency responders.
This would include piloting a community paramedicine program that will allow paramedics to provide treatment in the field and connect uh individuals to follow-up care, reducing unnecessary uh crowded um emergency room care.
Let's let's keep the focus on what works.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
I'd also like to call Ally Victorine, Domingo Armendez, Lords Alvarez, and Hector Hernandez.
Go ahead.
Good afternoon.
My name is Gabriel Manrique, the community organizer representing Luna and the real coalition.
I'm a resident of district three.
We appreciate elements of the council memoranda that prioritize investment in youth and families, including increased funding for implementation of the children and youth services master plan and continue support for programs such as VES and other youth violence prevention initiative.
Sustaining and expanding this program to remain a priority.
The memorandus recognition of child care affordability is also important.
We support unit to find alternative funding options to sustain the family, friends, and neighbors, caregiver support network, and encourage continued collaboration with the Santa Clara County and community providers to strengthen child care access for working families.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Deb St.
Julian D2 Surge, rapid response.
Budgets show leadership's focus.
The San Jose budget proposal proposal largely reacts to people who end up downstream versus investing in upstream proactive solutions.
The budget focuses on the bottom of the waterfall, where we find people without adequate resources or housing.
San Jose's leaders need to look up.
You need to ask what are some of the things that would keep people from flunging off the waterfall?
And people have been mentioning them in this meeting.
These are preventive top of the waterfall solutions.
These are public safety solutions.
Yeah, look up.
You need to fund programs that keep people from falling over and the RRN that protects our thank you.
Next speaker.
Allie Victorine, president of the D7 leadership group and Seven Trees Neighborhood Association.
We support the mayor's budget message as it aligns with the concerns of the D7 community.
We support sheltering the unhoused and increasing staffing and technology for police and fire departments.
Beautify SJ's anti-graffities illegal dumping and neighborhood engagement programs have helped transform and strengthen our neighborhoods.
They should be fully funded.
While police stop the crime, it was code enforcement is the reason at least two illegal gambling houses, both next to schools, are now well-maintained rental units.
No encampment zones and the monitoring team is the reason families can enjoy the Coyote Creek Trail again.
We support youth intervention programs that prevent crime and gang, but wonder about our park.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker, Alejandra Aguilar, come on down, Sandy Perry and Lori.
Hi, my name is Lourdes Alvarez Halstrup.
I'm a community organizer with Working Partnerships USA.
And I'm here to advocate for an affordability agenda through this year's budget.
Our community is being hit all over, grappling with Steve Costa's housing, child care groceries so much more.
We urge you to support working families housing and innovative collaborative approach to unlock thousands of new affordable homes, build cheaper, faster, and good, well-paying unionized jobs.
If the city commits to exploring working families housing, San Jose will truly lead the way on housing.
Our community can quickly move towards testing a locally controlled system for housing where renters and public have more agency and we have can effectively bring everyone together in the power of organized labor committee developers and local governments to ensure everyone in San Jose has a place to call home.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
And Otokanaboli.
Oh hello, hi, my name is Helte Hernandez.
I'm uh Tony Member from Isaiah San Jose.
I'm here to um to advocate for a lot of unhost hope folks are here in uh San Jose, but having actually uh more affordable housing uh procedure.
That's why I'm here to support the affordable agenda as outline the memo from Council Member Ortiz Campus Casey Duan can let us uh for for preventing homelessness caring for your you for our youth and building homes and preventing layouts and protecting core services.
Also, I'd like to um I'd like to urge to preserve the women and daughters and funding allocated for um from last year for deportations defense legal services, know your rights outreach and response network.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Um afternoon, members of the DIES.
My name is Domingo Armandis.
I am a community organizer for working partnerships USA, and I'm here to ask uh that we um move forward with the apologies that we look over with the working families uh housing initiative in order to um collaborate to approach to unlock uh thousands of new affordable homes for our city.
Uh these will be built cheaper, faster, and with good well-paying unionized jobs.
Um, and if the city commits to exploring working families housing, San Jose would truly lead the way on housing.
Our community can quickly move forward toward testing a locally controlled system for housing where renters and the public have more agency and we can effectively bring together this power of organized labor, community developers, and local governments to ensure everyone is San Jose.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hello, my name is Alejandra.
I'm coming for Give Workers by Nichols USA.
Um, support working families and affordable houses.
Uh, no remove the program for these ladies.
It they're showing their this program, they're working.
They're working right now.
And we need to support single mothers, a lot of single mother that use this kind of program, and they help your families.
Uh necessitamos programmas para mujeres solas con sus hijos familias in general que difficultan cada día más.
They in general make it increasingly difficult to find a home due to high rental costs.
So please help for the opportunities and find a thank you.
Thank you.
Hi, Mayor and Council.
My name is Lori.
I'm a 23-year resident of San Jose, District 6, and a member of Surge, Santa Clara County.
True public safety is built on people thriving.
When everyone in San Jose, no matter who you are or where you from where you're from, has what we need to thrive.
That is what makes our city healthy and safe.
Surge urges our council to incorporate upstream prevention and racial equity into every area of the city's budget.
Permanent supportive housing, investing in homelessness prevention before homelessness starts, including renters' right to counsel, children and youth services, violence prevention and trust non-police crisis response.
This is what you next speaker, Kristen Link, Cindy Bautista and Joanna Bacera come on down.
Speaker Kristen Link, Cindy Bautista, and Joanna Becerra.
Come on down, hola, buenos tards, me nombre, Celia, Patricia.
Years working as a supplier here in the city of San Jose.
I am an active member of the CCP.
I am here to demand that the city council direct the city manager to include child care within the budget priorities.
Well, all the children I've had in my care since the country closed have been referred by the same mothers to whom I've offered my services.
I'm here to urge the state and the state and the city to stop killing daycare.
Daycare is business, killing daycare and a privileging NGO.
We are small business and a stakeholder because you own homes here.
We live here, we pick taxes here, and we work here.
Calling three more names, Jeremy Baroose, Marina Licenosa, and Ms.
Rain Mendoza.
Good afternoon.
I'm Sandy Perry.
I'm with South Bay Community Land Trust, but I'm re speaking for myself today as a resident of District 3.
Uh the mayor's well, I call on the council to reject the mayor's budget as it's originally written.
It puts out a welcome map for Silicon Valley billionaires and dirty data centers and sends a message to all low-income residents and people of color to get out.
Does not even mention the fact that we've been in a displacement crisis in San Jose since the 2008 recession, and that people, low-income people have been forced to move to Modesto, Merced, and Sacramento, which by the way, it's not a good look for someone who's trying to run for governor.
I am a community organizer for friends of Guadalupe.
Thanks to the million dollars invested last year.
It was possible to help many families who were filled with fear and uncertainty, not knowing when they would be separated from their families, leaving them unprotected.
And on behalf of my community, I ask the council to continue investing the million dollars so that we can continue supporting our community with legal services and one million dollars.
It's not just a number, it's a bit of peace of mind, protection, and hope for many families who live in constant fear of going out to work, going out to school, or going out to do their shopping.
Thanks to the mayor for including us in his budget message.
But we hope he fulfills his promise to raise an additional 500,000 on top of the million through philanthropy.
And I would like to make it clear that these are the afternoon.
We are the first line of defense for our immigrant population.
We're there letting them know that we care and that we want to protect them and keep them as part of our community.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good afternoon, Jeremy Bruce with Amigos de Guadalupe Center for Justice and Empowerment.
And we urge the council to preserve the one million dollars for immigration services that was in invested last year and urge the mayor's office to raise an additional 500,000 with philanthropy.
We are encouraged by the mayor's budget message, highlighting reinvestment in these services, but we cannot afford to backtrack.
This funding is not just about legal support, it's about honoring our values, ensuring everyone in San Jose can thrive.
With the one million invested last year, we were able to scale up with departition defense legal services and emergency legal services and dispatch with the rapid response network.
Let's meet the moment with the leadership San Jose is known for.
Thank you.
I'd like to call a few more names.
Felicia M, Cole Cameron, Kimberly Wu, and we Tran.
Come on down.
Go ahead.
Good afternoon, everyone.
My name is Marnelli.
I'm with Lead Filipino overseeing their health equity work, and I live in San Jose District 6.
I'm also representing the real coalition.
We support the March memorandum.
The memo directs the city manager to evaluate strategies to explore increasing the share of measure e-funds for prevention and reinvest interim housing savings into the homelessness prevention system programs.
When residents receive timely support, such as eviction, prevention assistance, or flexible housing help, they are far more likely to remain housed.
When we canvassed across San Jose last year, our Filipina AXO elders and families have expressed how hard it is to pay rent and have resorted to living in multi-generational house households.
Even the cost of living is slowly pushing out families who have lived here for generations to avoid homelessness.
When folks are housed, they resense they retain a sense of dignity, can work in San Jose and contribute to the next speaker.
This of course means stability, protection, and hope.
Because in the end, like I told you before, a government is measured by the way you treat your most vulnerable.
Gandhi said that so let's keep it going.
And also I need District Six and District One to answer the email.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Shake it a little bit.
You're going at it.
I'd hate to be a budget person as I've done in the past.
It's a challenge, and I appreciate you taking it on.
Uh being a part of our various mayor's D9 section.
Um senior instructor research and a veteran.
I don't see a couple of things listed, but I didn't read the 40 pages.
So my question is with housing for veterans.
We have a number of school sites that are having to be vacated, so there's another resource of existing buildings or the site.
Cooper, did they give you the microphone?
Oh, okay.
Good evening.
I'm gonna give right to the point.
I thank you all for doing a good job.
My priority is number one safety.
Number two is get the homeless off the street, you're doing a good job.
In the number three, is think about the veterans, the veterans.
I have a lot of my families in the Air Force and stuff like that.
And I'm concerned about the mental patient out on the street because that's the issue.
So far, I'm very pleased with the job you're doing.
It's not easy, but make the wise decision on the budget to keep the certain things priority.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Next speaker, I'd like to call Ozelle Kirkland, Kathy Cordova, Orlana Mejia, and Sean Passial.
Come on down.
Go ahead.
Hi, I'm Kim with Siren.
We strongly support Rio's truly affordable staying for more to keep families in San Jose.
And we must also protect the need to keep families together in San Jose.
Thus, we also urge the city to heed rapid response networks in IPEN's request to sustain and solidify the one million dollars in ongoing funding for immigration protection services and actualize the mayor's promise of getting the additional $500,000 from philanthropy.
Due to the federal budget cuts and mass deportations that kidnap broad owners of families and the anti-immigrant agenda, restricting work eligibility and sources of income, our immigrant families are facing attacks from the federal government on all fronts.
The state framework is vital, as well as the 1.5 million funding is also vital to keep our families together, and that's how we keep our communities safe.
Thank you.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Council members.
My name is Sweetran, Executive Director of SIREN, and we're part of the steering committee for the Rapid Response Network and for the real coalition.
San Jose did something historic last year, which is to invest a million dollars into immigration services in a time of unprecedented fear.
While we have not seen the dramatic raids in other from other places, that does not mean that ICE is not here.
Our county has seen three times the number of detentions as any other county in the Bay Area.
We are one of the most impacted counties, if not in the state, if not the most.
What this should make clear is that the threat is not gone.
We urge the council to continue the $1 million in immigration services that it allocated last year and secure the additional $500,000 through philanthropy.
We also support the state framework for the real coalition because as much as we fight for you, that's your time.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor Mayhan and Council members.
My name is Kathy Cordova, and I'm here as the co-chair of Real, the nonprofit race equity action leadership coalition.
I have lived in San Jose for more than 50 years and I'm currently a resident of District 6.
The real coalition submitted a letter in response to the mayor's budget message and the March 13th memorandum from Council members Campos, Ortiz, Dawan, Condelis, and Casey.
We appreciate those council members for elevating affordability as a key priority in highlighting issues that align with community concerns, including homelessness prevention and support for families, youth, and older adults.
As the city council begins difficult budget deliberations, we urge you to center decisions on affordability, racial equity, and household stability.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Jennifer Keller, Yula Idomoto, Ray Brampson, Carmen Martinez.
I'm gonna call a few more names until I see movement.
Um Samantha Rojas, Diane Gaskill, and Joe Nieto.
Go ahead.
Mayor and City Council, I'm Osell Kirkland of the Cataldi Park Neighborhood Association.
I support the mayor's budget and the focus on making our homelessness response more efficient, faster, and preventative.
Preserving measure fund E is a smart investment that keeps the families from falling into crisis.
In my own encounters, I've met people who appear able and want to break that cycle.
And this funding is a real opportunity, not just to manage the homelessness, but to end it.
We should prioritize self-sufficiency like job training and other structured pathways out of dependency and the goal long-term resilience, dignity, and independence.
I urge this council to support the mayor's budget in the full and ensure its funding to break the cycle, not sustain it.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Hello, my name is Heula Itamoto, and I'm a resident of District 6 and a longtime early educator.
I'm here today on behalf of the educators who can't be because they're caring for our children as we speak, so parents across San Jose can show up to work.
Child care is a central infrastructure, just like transportation or public services.
It allows families to participate in our economy and it prevents them from falling into being unhoused.
The return on investment is clear.
For every one dollar invested in child care policies, pro-child care policies, returns can be up to $12 when investments are made equitably.
Investing in child care supports working families, strengthens a workforce led by immigrant women of color, and shows our children that San Jose believes in their future.
I'm also a mom, and I'd really love to raise my son here in San Jose, so I would love your help in doing that.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Can I pass?
I'd like to wait until the mayor comes back.
You can go to the back of the line.
Is that okay?
And before you speak, I just want to let you know.
When the council members go in the back, there's audio playing back there, so they can hear you.
Um they can't escape it.
It's it's uh the audio plays everywhere in the back rooms.
I just want people to know just because you don't see people on the dies doesn't mean they're not listening.
Okay, go ahead.
Perfect.
All right, hello, council and mayor.
Uh I just want to let you guys know.
My name is Joe Nieto, and I'm in District 5 with the Plata Royal Neighborhood Association.
And I am here to thank the mayor for putting the uh budget message that keeps the focus on the basic public safety, blight, trying to end a homeless, improving our neighborhoods.
I hope council will stay focused in the city and uh do the most basic responsibilities.
I do realize it's a tough budget, but it's something that we need to do, and let's just try to do the right thing for the people.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hello, City Council.
My name is Cottman, and I'm here representing the real coalition.
Recent discussions in the public safety, finance, and strategic support committee highlighted concerns about the city's enforcement focused approach to homelessness.
Hundreds of enforcement actions have been taken against unhoused residents under the city's code of conduct approach.
Yet this strategy has produced zero documented placements into shelter or housing as a result of police outreach.
At the same time, San Jose continues to face a severe shortage of deeply affordable housing and limited capacity and prevention programs.
Enforcement alone cannot resolve homelessness.
The city should prioritize strategies to address the root drivers of housing instability, including expanding homelessness prevention, increasing deeply affordable housing, and protecting tenants from displacement.
So fewer residents fall into homelessness.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Also, Danny Garza, Stella Slingstad, Michael Bryant, Nigel Hanson, and Bob Brownstein.
Come on down.
Um, my name is SMAT, and I'm representing Defensoras today.
I urge council to protect and fund immigrant defense and community protection services in this budget.
Right now, many patients with unsatisfactory immigrant status are simply avoiding going to their medical appointments.
People are delaying cancer treatment, cancer screenings, primary care visits, and urgent treatment because they are afraid of ice presence or immigration enforcement, particularly in ease and downtown San Jose areas where many health care resources are located.
As a result, some patients are left with delayed care.
In the past few weeks, patients and community members have shared that when neighbors when neighborhoods and streets are secured by community by trusted community-based approaches, not ICE, they feel safer seeking care.
That sense of safety directly impacts whether someone shows up to a clinic or avoids it entirely.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor, Vice Mayor, City Council, Ray Bramson, Chief Operating Officer, Destination Home.
On behalf of Destination Home, I'd like to thank both the mayor and council for their support of the homelessness prevention system.
During times of difficult budget crises, we have to make tough decisions and support initiatives that work for our most vulnerable residents.
Homelessness prevention is fast, effective, and saves our community money and time.
The more we invest, the better we'll see.
As we enter into the community planning process over the next few years to work on ending homelessness for our community, we'll need to invest in all of the above strategies, which can help our community thrive.
I thank you.
I thank the housing department for their excellent work and this collaboration going forward.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hello, I'm Jennifer Kelleher Cloyd.
I'm the executive director of First Five Santa Clara County, and I'm going to ask you to join us and the County of Santa Clara in investing in our children who are our City of San Jose residents.
Our children are not a regional issue.
They are a local San Jose issue.
How can you do that?
First, you can invest as much in the children and youth master plan as the city did in planning it.
We've named child care as one of those priority areas, and we need to deliver on that promise.
Second, we can support the family friend and neighbor program at our local library, which is hugely successful and well attended by our communities who need it.
Third, you can support child care who are our local businesses and can thrive and help other.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Welcome to the afternoon, lads and losses.
My name is Diane Gasco.
I'm a former U.S.
Navy pilot, project manager, and what they called an efficiency expert.
If you want to find out how to do something easily fast and at the least cost, ask somebody from the Navy.
I'm also a member of the City of San Jose Community Emergency Response Team, a pilot for the state of California emergency response team, and a former project manager for a Silvic Silicon Valley nonprofit that builds homes for the elderly.
I'm not here for me.
None of that stuff matters.
Matt, um Mayor Matt and Council, I read through the entire budget.
It's amazing.
I can see how many thousand hours.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Hello, my name is Nigel, president of the Thousand Oaks Neighborhood Association in District 9.
I'm here to speak in support of Mayor Mahan's budget message.
We need to continue supporting growth in the police department as we head into increasing retirements.
If we fall behind on staffing now, we will suffer the consequences in years to come.
And uh lastly, although the city does not directly influence funding for it, I would hope to see support for our public school system to the fullest extent possible.
This, along with pushing affordable housing in San Jose, so that young families can plant the seeds for a strong San Jose.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good afternoon, Honorable Mayor, uh Peter Ortiz, City Council, Angel Reels, Lee Wilcox, John Risto, Olympia.
Uh all of you have contributed to our neighborhood success, and so I'll be brief.
First, uh we Platte Oil support and encourage more funding for San Jose police officers.
Without without them, the East Valley would be lost.
Second, we're looking to also encourage more park funding.
It's really simple.
That's a quality of life issue, and the last thing in three seconds is how'd you get on the daily show?
Thank you, next speaker.
Thank you.
Bob Brownstein, District Three.
I support the memo from Council Members Compost Stone and others because it is a serious effort to correct the major fiscal errors in the mayor's strategy on homelessness.
The mayor's message claims San Jose can achieve functional zero for homelessness at a cost of 225 million one time and 234 million ongoing.
This is massively inaccurate.
These figures are based on a number of homeless people counted in February of 2025, but the city's own data shows an inflow of new homeless persons of about 2400 a year.
The city's prevention programs are nowhere near adequate.
The council members are right to emphasize more prevention.
The mayor is wrong to oppose those actions.
Thank you, next speaker.
Alison Cingalani, Stephen Samuel, David Burroughs, Dave Peterson, and Carl San Miguel come on down.
Good afternoon, Mayor and City Council.
My name is Michael Bryant.
I live in District 10, South San Jose, uh down in between uh Burnell and Cottle.
Uh I agree with uh your proposal and the things that you're planning on doing.
I've seen the great changes uh down in our area between uh where the Lowe's uh store is on Cottle and Costco down on Burnell.
That whole corridor there was tents and encampments and trash, and that's all been changed greatly, and I appreciate the way that's all been done.
With that being said, I'm also a member of CERT, and I'd like to see something done there.
And I also would like to see the parks covered as well.
Best you could do.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
I don't know how you do this.
I'm exhausted.
Mr.
Mayor, Council members, I am a resident of District 9.
During one of your speeches on homelessness, something you said stayed with me.
Mr.
Mayor, you said they deserve to be treated with dignity.
And you're right.
Hearing that shifted how I look at the housing issue.
So far, you've inspired me to get involved in cleaning up the city I was born and raised in.
I love my city, and it's clear you do too.
In fact, I lost an outfit painting one of your walls.
I ask Vice Mayor and Council to vote for the mayor's budget message in full.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hello, everyone.
My name is Stephen Samuel from District 10, where Matt Mahan was our council member.
He served us very well, and I thought it important to acknowledge and commend the governance that we've had.
I'm a great believer in representative government, and in order for that to work, I believe that our representatives have to have honesty, integrity, courage, and kindness.
And our mayor has all of those.
I hope you'll all join me in my support of our great mayor and the proposed budget.
I'm also a great supporter of the idea that in order to reduce crime, we invest in our young people in our community.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Go ahead.
Hi, Dave Peterson.
Uh, District 10.
Uh, thank you, George, for being there, going through all of your stuff and all of you for sitting through this wonderful event.
Wouldn't it be great if it was like this every week?
I just want to point out the small business component of this uh uh budget message.
You need money, you gotta spend the money.
Whole bunch of people want to spend your money.
So you need to create the money, and you're gonna create that money by having small businesses uh start, create, grow, thrive, employ people, and develop a message by which this city can continue to grow.
Without that, the the income from those small businesses, you will not be able to do all of what these folks want to do with your money.
37 years in business in San Jose, not a penny from the city, and I uh am proud of that.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Council, Mayor.
Uh I'm here to support the the March uh budget.
Um there's a lot of good points to the budget, but I'd like to hone in on one, and that's the one that establishes development fee framework to defer payment of all housing impact fees and taxes until a certificate of occupancy, which is the very last item of the construction and new development.
It's important to do this because the developers need as much incentive to start their projects and not to be bogged down with the huge expense of all the the fees that uh are contributed to it.
And I would ask one last thing that you vote for this budget before Matt is forced to move to Sacramento.
Thank you, next speaker.
Um, I just wanted to say I'm getting quite a few duplicate cards.
I still have a lot of speakers left.
If I haven't called you, it's not because you didn't like I I missed you.
Um I'm just still getting through them.
So thank you for your patience.
Go ahead.
Okay.
Good afternoon.
My name is David.
I'm a resident of District 3.
Um I saw in the San Jose spotlight recently that one of our nearby cities had uh did agreed on doing having 42 focus points for this next uh fiscal period.
Um that kind of makes my head explode.
I don't see how anyone can keep track of 42 items.
I want to underline the um sort of the thing I appreciate about the budget here, is trying to keep focus on a small number of things.
I know budgets are tight, and um uh I know that these are long-term efforts, but I hope that as we as we revise the budget and move forward, we really really keep focused on the these focus items.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Mary Ng and Jeremiah Leinberger come on down.
Good afternoon, Alison Singalani, Director of Policy with SV at home.
We're pleased that Ellis Act language has been removed from the message and that the compost memo on conversion of Brandom Lane to permanent affordable housing is included.
We appreciate support for affordable housing via construction tax waivers in the March budget message, but this applies to a limited pool of projects, and additional tools are needed to support AC rehab projects and new construction with project-based vouchers.
We support the inclusion of items 10 through 15 from the five signature memo on proactive code enforcement, including housing element program S3.
We're pleased to see from the five signature memo items supporting PBCE, included supporting their absolutely critical work.
Structural reform alone cannot close the affordability gap, and new funding is needed for the affordable housing production and preservation we need.
We ask each of you to that's your time.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon.
My name is Helen Brock, and I'm a 54-year resident of San Jose.
And I'm here to support the mayor's budget message.
In spite of current budget issues, I urge you to stay laser focused on the very issues of the key issues of importance to San Jose residents.
You have produced measurable results in reducing the number of unsheltered homeless, increasing public safety, and removing some of the impediments to rapid home building.
Please continue making permanent housing more plentiful and affordable to the adult children of your constituents, bringing the unhoused indoors and ensuring the safety of our community by finding other ways to meet your budget challenges.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker, Kaya Huff, come on down.
Maria Carmen Via Lobos and Matthew Fraser.
Go ahead.
Esteemed Mayor and members of the council.
My name is Dimitri from District 3.
I speak in support of Mayor's budget proposal.
The budget process as our democracy overall is an exercise in prioritization.
The top priority should be making our city the best place to live.
And this means we need to stay focused on housing affordability, public safety, and reducing homelessness.
The mayor's framework builds on the process and progress we already made and focuses on practical solutions.
There are difficult trade-offs given our city's uh fiscal situation, but I believe the budget plan strikes the right balance and serves our community best.
I urge the council to support the mayor's March budget message.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good evening.
My name is Vasindra Tarimeti.
Good evening, Mayor and Council.
I'm from D10.
I support Mayor's March budget message, especially its emphasis on breaking the cycle of untreated mental health issues and substance abuse.
Why do we continue to see the same cycle?
Contact release under written to the streets without treatment.
Without treatment programs outlined in the budget, such as aligning judicial and behavioral health system and expanding treatment placements, our neighbors suffer in a cycle that they cannot escape alone.
Also, in the spirit of compassion, I wanted to request for increased funding for spin Utah Services for Animal Shelter, whether it's a person or individual compassion is not is needed in a crisis.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good evening, Mayor.
Good evening, Mayor and City Council.
My name is Jeremiah Lamberger.
I serve as a development and data analysis at the African American Community Service Agency and a current doctoral student.
So I understand how important it is for the city to invest into our youth to gain opportunities and access.
My concern is access and opportunity for our youth.
As the city continues to lead in AI and innovation, I want to ensure that all youth, especially black and brown youth are gaining access to internships, career pathways.
And I urge the city's budget to implement that for our youth and to provide consistent access for our youth to gain paid internships, workforce development, and career exposures throughout the year.
Investment in our black and brown youth is essential as we continue to thank you.
Next speaker, Neil Valenzuela, come on down.
Brianna Hernandez, Julissa M, and Jonathan.
Go ahead.
I'm Mary Yang, and my um goal is to affirm all of you for your courage in these times and your dedication.
And I offer uh two quotes from the last century.
Uh the first one's Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who actually quotes somebody from the 1800s.
Uh, the mark of a society is not how far those who have much can go, but how far those who have little can go.
And on the other end, on the right side, I quote Margaret Thatcher.
The problem with progressives is they eventually run out of other people's money.
So I offer these two as you go through your budget crisis here or with the deficit.
And I had a third one from John F.
Kennedy, but goodbye.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good afternoon.
My name is Kaya Health, policy and advocacy intern with a focus in child care systems and support at the African American Community Service Agency.
I want to highlight the importance of child care.
In San Jose, child care providers, especially small, home-based, and community-rooted providers, are essential to working families.
They are not just caregivers, but they are small business owners and trusted pillars in our community.
Yet many of them are struggling to stay in their businesses due to rising costs and limited access to resources.
I strongly urge you to continue investing in child care support efforts such as Family Friends and Neighbor Support Network and by strengthening partnerships with community-based providers while also taking notes from San Francisco, New York, and New Mexico providing free and subsidized child care.
Please make providers and their sustainability of their business a priority when supporting.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Thanks speaker.
Good evening, leadership.
Thank you for the opportunity to speak.
My name is Matthew Frazier, native of San Jose.
I'm a columnist with Times Media Inc.
in San Jose, and very briefly I wanted to advocate for increased funding where possible for journalistic and creative writing programs across the schools, colleges, and universities, and even the uh creation and expedition of vocational traineeships and so on.
As someone who's been writing since the age of four, I highly uh applaud everything that you've done collectively and would like uh consideration for increased funding for writing, if possible.
Thank you each for your time.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council members.
My name is Brianna Hernandez.
I'm a 12th grader at the Eastside Union District's William C.
Overfell and a core leader at Californians for Justice, CFJ, and the Youth Building Coalition.
At Californians for Justice, we work to advance racial and educational justice within our schools and districts across four cities.
I'm also a part of the Destination College Advising Corps and the Boys and Girls Club of America.
On my school, it's very rare to take risks, and it's even more common to never leave Eastside.
In a low-income area like Eastside, it's not uncommon for a lot of students to have part-time jobs to support their family.
With DCAC support and enrichment programs, I was admitted early decision to UC Berkeley.
But due to budget cuts, a lot of my peers won't have the same resources.
That's why it's crucial we invest in these opportunities to give students like myself the ambition for the same opportunities.
I urge you to invest in our education, to invest in our youth, and to invest in our community.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker, Greg Peralta, Vicky Ramirez, and Dan from D10.
Come on down.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council members.
I'm a 12th grader from Eastide High School Overfell and a core leader at Californians for Justice, AKA CFJ.
Today I want to talk about funding safe places for art, music, cultural expression programs, sports, and physical activities for youth.
Currently, I am wearing a mariachi chato suit.
Growing up, I was part of the Air USD Mariachi program, but we had very limited space with many participants and limited instructors.
Max I can provide children with these resources.
Once my older brother was able to take advantage of it for soccer.
Through Maxa, he built community, learned how to expand his sportmanship and much more.
I was passionate about all the arts I was offered growing up, and the future generations shouldn't be denied their own.
Through CFJ, I learned I could make this possible by advocating for Maxa and joined the Youth Building Peace Coalition to guarantee the youth and their families can be accommodated.
Overall, investing in youth programs will enhance enhance community prosperity in the long run.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good afternoon, everyone.
My name is Neil Valenzuela, a senior at Overfell High School and a leader with California for Justice.
Today I want to talk about why student voice matter.
My personal story, student voice matters so much to me growing up.
My father had to work three jobs.
But during my 10th grade year, he was sent back to Mexico in an instant life change.
This experience opened my eyes.
Many students carry invisible struggles like financial hardship and family separation that most people never see.
We understand these challenges because we live them.
I joined a youth building peace coalition, so students like me can advocate for the support we need to succeed.
Investing in the leadership, investing in the future of youth who sounds like when we uplift students' voices, we help every young person to reach their full potential.
So I urge you to invest in our education in our youth.
Thank you for your time, City Council and members.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
My name is Jonathan, and I am an 11th grade student from Overfell High School and an immigrant and civil rights activist with WCO for the people.
As the son of a hardworking low-income immigrant family, something I have dealt with growing up was lack of resources for our big immigrant community.
As it was very clear from a young age that at any moment my parents could be taken from me.
Thanks to nonprofits like Amigos de Guadalupe, my parents have started to get the legal help they deserve, which was largely kept me at ease.
Additionally, other organizations like the Rapid Response Network are essential to keep our community safe.
This is why I urge the mayor and the city council to preserve the one million dollar fund for legal defense and for the merits furthermore expended by 500,000 through philanthropy.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Um Jean Marie White, come on down.
R.
Consiglio, Oscar QM and Morgan.
Steve leaders.
Oh, sorry.
And one more Moigan Mahades.
Wait, Mahdi Zeday.
Uh, sorry, I practiced that one.
I think I butchered it.
Um, go ahead.
Uh Steamed leaders, I am Dan from D10.
Uh, in the city budget, public safety is number one.
And I think you know that, but you know, we do have the least number of police officers per capita of any large city.
Uh San Jose Fire, they represent our survival, you know.
So keep up with that.
Congrats on helping with the homeless crisis.
It's not over, but it's it's working.
On the other hand, watch out for NGOs.
I mean, they made 24 billion dollars disappear in California, okay?
So I trust the city staff, be careful with the NGOs.
Uh, don't sue any government agencies, and uh, frankly, I worry about funding rapid response network.
Are we gonna get Minneapolis here?
Uh thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good evening, mayor and council member.
My name is Edu Viga Ramirez, and I am a family child care provider in San Jose for 10 years.
Thank you for prioritizing child care in the city budget.
But I need to be very clear.
We are in crisis.
The freezing estate childcare funding is not a small issue.
It is actively forcing providers like me to close our doors while families are still disasperately looking for for daycare.
This is not a supply problem.
This is an access problem.
California promised a mixed delivery system, no a system that pushed family child care providers out of the market.
We were essential workers during COVID 19.
We show up when no no one sells good.
Now we are asking you to protect us.
Invest in subsidy child care in San Jose, because without us, families cannot work in our country.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon.
My name is Greg Peralta.
I'm a resident of District 6, and residents across San Jose, including myself, want to see continued progress through addressing encampments and improving conditions in all of our neighborhoods.
On a personal example, this um I had a friend who visited me last month who used to live here.
She noticed the tremendous improvement.
So I want to say thank you.
It's working.
But at the same time, um, in my district in front of the building I live in, we had a man who was pretty aggressive living there for a month, a month, sorry, a week.
And um, after three visits by the police, he did leave only to return one night and knocking on doors trying to get into homes.
So we still have work left to be done.
I encourage the council to support the mayor's March budget message.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hi, Mayor Mahan and Council members.
My name is Mojgon Mahti Sade.
I'm a community organizer.
I'm here to express my support for Mayor's March budget message.
Uh, one of the priorities that uh residents care about most is uh ending legal dumping and continuing to clean up our neighborhoods so residents can take pride in the places where they live and work.
Illegal dumping is something many of us see regularly, and it can be frustrating when it sits there for weeks before anything is done.
A practical solution is allowing beautify SJ teams to send warning letters sooner, which would help the city respond faster and reducing the timeline from nearly two months to closer than 10 days.
This would help prevent repeat dumping and also save the city time and resources.
As someone who cares deeply about the quality of our neighborhood, a risk.
Thank you that your time.
Next speaker, Dashiel Leeds, Joe Schvenison, Victor Vasquez, and Dan Mount Sear, come on down.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.
My name is Jean-Marie White, and I live in Nagley Park.
I want to talk about public safety and homelessness.
A few days ago, my gym coach was walking with his four kids on the Alameda and had to explain open drug activity on the sidewalk.
Around the same time, my neighbor's cat was killed by loose dogs from an encampment along Coyote Creek.
And those dogs have been chasing joggers.
These are real impacts impacts on families.
The city has made progress, reducing unsheltered homelessness, and this shows why continuing that work matters.
Getting people indoors improves safety for everyone.
Council members, please support this budget message in full.
Thank you, next speaker.
Esteem leaders.
The time of reckoning for a balanced budget is here.
Before you cut our services, there needs to be some accountability for some of our unclassified employees who you know are not very good at their jobs.
You know what the audits say.
Um their performance has cost us millions.
Um please stop the bleeding and whoever wins this budget fight, balance the budget.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Um Victor Costa, come on down.
Foo and Fred Brew.
Hello, Mayor and Council.
My name is Dan Mount Sear.
I'm a small residential builder that has been working in San Jose for over 30 years.
I ask you to vote in full for the mayor's March budget.
I have worked on permanent housing and shelters as well as housing for families, individuals, and seniors.
I appreciate the budget's effort to fund and support E, all of the above.
We need every type of housing.
There are two phases of uh every development project.
The first phase is the one where money is going out, and the second phase is the money is where money starts coming in.
And allowing us to pay some of the fees that occupancy makes projects more feasible so that we can actually break ground.
Uh I do appreciate that hard choices need to be made.
Again, please support the mayor's budget in full.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Victor representing Youth Building Peace Coalition.
We have a youth crisis.
We have the highest youth homelessness rates in the country.
Most of our youth that are in juvenile facilities are Latino African American.
Latino residents make up half of the homicide victims, and the suicide rates have sharply increased.
We do recommend a memorandum investing in one million the children and youth master plan.
But most importantly, we also want to call attention to the 10 youth empowerment demands that we email to you, and you can check your inbox right now.
Invest in the youth empowerment fund, invest in building youth centers like MAXA, providing young people services to prevent violence, youth leadership and early learning, dealing with mental health abuse.
There's a list less longer, but I also ask you to agendize these items at 6 p.m.
Thank you, Nick's next speaker.
Hello, my name is Dasha Leeds, District 4 resident and conservation coordinator for the Sierra Club Loma Prieta chapter.
Members of the San Jose Youth Climate Action Team would like to attend today, but they cannot due to the timing of this meeting.
Climate change affects our daily lives, our health.
We suffer here from some of the worst air quality in the nation, and unfortunately, our city is not on track to meet its climate targets.
San Jose's focus areas do not include climate change or the natural environment.
The annual survey doesn't even give us the option to tell you that climate change and the natural environment are important to us.
In critical meetings like today, climate change and nature are a part of your memos or statements.
Please take stronger action, adopt a building electrification reach code, protect our parks funding, protect our immigrants, and consider the risks of data centers.
Thanks for your time.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
I'd also like to call Krista Delatory and Ibrahim Diallo.
Come on down.
Go ahead.
Good evening.
My name is Fred Brew, and I'm a resident of District 10.
I support the mayor's budget recommendations and urge the city to continue the progress it has made in course services and cost management.
Given the current fiscal restraints, the city should pilot AI-assisted report writing to reduce administrative time for police officers and get more value from our existing public safety staffing.
Related to this, I believe the city should embrace practical AI solutions where it is safe and it makes sense in reducing cost.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Um Rebecca Selden and Neil Park McClintic.
Come on down.
Go ahead.
Cool.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.
My name is Victor Costa.
I'm with SIU Local 521 and Childcare Providers United.
I urge that you adopt the affordability agenda memo from Council Members Candela's Compose, Ortiz, Dwone, and Casey.
Our community is already stretched thin.
Families are already facing rising costs for housing, child care, groceries, and gas.
Uh we must prevent homelessness by building affordable homes with good union paying jobs through the working families housing initiative.
We must invest in our kids by doubling funding for the children and youth master plan, supporting subsidized child care, our libraries, and after school programs.
And we must protect essential services and prevent layoffs by creating the community and services stabilization fund.
Austerity measures won't fix San Jose's challenges, nor is that a rev revolution of common sense.
Please adopt this memo and prioritize real affordability.
Thank you, next speaker.
My name is Phil Van, and I'm a resident of District 7.
I urge you to preserve the $1 million in funding allocated last year for deportation, defense legal services, know-year rights outreach, and rapid response network.
I support the mayor's commitment to raise an additional 500k through philanthropy, filantry for this work, but I do not support your sweeps and removing encampments policies.
I have seen police breaking into tents and dragging unhoused neighbors out, beautiful beautiful SJ stealing birth certificates and IDE, be people being ghosted after saying they they want to get into interim housing.
And I also want more restrictions on AI because there are many types of real children doing sexual acts from just spectators and removing jobs, especially in the creative industry.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker, um, Joe Brown, come on down, Antonina and Andrea Munoz.
Go ahead.
Good afternoon, Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Council members.
Housing affordability remains one of the biggest challenges facing San Jose families.
Too many residents are spending an unsustainable share of their income just to stay housed.
The mayor's budget message recognizes the increasing housing supply and removing barriers to develop our key to improve affordability over time.
These are practical steps that move the city in the right direction.
I encourage the council to support the mayor's March budget message.
Thank you very much.
And happy St.
Patrick's Day.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon.
My name is Krista Delatore, and I'm a D6 resident and here on behalf of IFPT Local 21.
We represent over a thousand city employees here from engineers and architects to senior librarians and many more.
We ask you to support the affordability agenda outlined by council members Ortiz, Campos, Casey, Done, and Candelas, which focus on preventing layoffs, protecting core services, addressing homelessness, supporting youth, and building affordable homes under the family's housing plan.
Balancing the budget should not come at the expense of essential services our community relies on.
We support creating a community and services stabilization fund to protect city workers who keep our neighborhoods safe, parks open, and libraries running.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.
My name is Neil Part McClintic, and I'm speaking with Working Partnerships USA.
I'm also a resident of D6 in San Jose.
I would like to thank Council members Candelas, Campos Ortiz, Done, and Casey for their memo and speak in full support of the memo as well, including its asks for supporting children, families, and seniors, preventing cuts to after-school programs and libraries.
We thank the authors for including working families housing, and thank the mayor for including this in his revision as well.
Working families housing represents an innovative third way for us to fund thousands of affordable homes faster, cheaper, and with good dignified jobs by partnering with the labor movement.
Luz Aguilar, Russ Baker, Cesar Palink Harris, and Doris Garcia come on down.
Good evening, Mayor and Council members.
My name is Andrea Munoz, and I am the community resource coordinator for the Children and Youth Services Master Plan at Catholic Charities.
I work directly with some of the most vulnerable families in the Santee and Seven Trees neighborhoods.
The work we are doing through the Children and Youth Services Master Plan is vital in creating spaces where families and youth feel supported, connected, and empowered.
Through this work, we support families facing immense fear and stress, especially in relation to the immigration.
Our youth are absorbing the stress, and it is crucial that we continue to provide opportunities and safe outlets for them to express themselves.
This program ensures equitable access for youth in impacted neighborhoods to access services they would not be able to receive otherwise, such as after-school programs, summer camps, and enrichment activities.
These programs have also been critical in helping families navigate school closures and transitions, ensuring children.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.
My name is Antonina, and I live in Hyde Park in District 3.
First, I want to thank all of you for the accomplishments this last year.
Please continue to follow through and stay focused on expanding safe, dignified interim housing and shelter.
Please consider, please continue focus on our core issues with the city too.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Oh no.
Hello, Mayor and Council.
My name is Russ Baker.
I am a city employee and a city resident.
Been here for many years.
Everyday city workers keep sound as they livable, staffing libraries, maintaining parks, responding to emergencies.
The city navigates a difficult budget.
We support a community and service stabilization fund to phase in any reductions, responsibility, avoiding abrupt layoffs and cuts to essential services or residents depend on.
I spoke here about 15 years ago, and we were in a similar situation to this.
Whole lot of different people sitting up here.
And uh we made some decisions back then that hurt, and that uh we can do better this time.
I'm sure you guys can uh make make me proud.
Thanks.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good evening, Mayor and Council.
My name is Lucia Guilar, and I serve as program coordinator with Catholic Charities under the Children and Youth Services Master Plan, working directly with youth and families in some of San Jose's most impacted neighborhoods.
Well, I appreciate the mayor's proposal to include 500k for the Children and Youth Services Master Plan.
I urge you to support the one million dollar recommendation for implementation.
Current conditions highlight the need for continued investment in youth services, particularly in communities with higher needs.
Through the master plan demonstration sites such as the Franklin McCounty Children's Initiative and Somos Mayfair, along with programs like Best Recreation Camps and Safe Summer, are connecting youth and families to services and opportunities.
From what we are seeing on the ground, Danita's growing, not shrinking.
That is why it is now the time to scale back investments in youth.
It is time to strengthen and expand what we know is already working.
I urge you to support the one thank you, next speaker.
Alina Alma Jacobo, David Noel, and Ofisa Patty, come on down.
Go ahead.
Good afternoon or good evening, Mayor and Council.
My name is Doris Garcia, and I serve as program manager with Catholic charities, working directly with youth and families in some of San Jose's most impacted neighborhoods.
The youth and families we serve face significant daily stress and fear, especially those from immigrant families concerned about immigration enforcement.
Adding to this, school closures have removed crucial safe spaces for support support.
Safe structured environments like rock after school, best, recreation camps, Saturday night lights, and safe summer initiatives are now more vital than ever.
From our on-the-ground perspective, this is a time to strengthen, not decrease our investment in youth.
The children and youth services master plan provides the roadmap.
I respectfully urge the council to support the recommendation to set aside one billion dollars and receive that's your time.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good evening, Mayor and Council members.
Uh, my name is Cesar Palancares, and uh I urge you to adopt the affordability agenda outlined by council members.
Our community needs real solutions to prevent homelessness, support youth, build housing, and protect essential services.
Please support the working families housing initiative to create more affordable mixed income house quickly while creating good jobs.
We must also continue to invest in children and youth master plan, protecting after-school programs and library hours that families depend on.
Finally, protect the city services and work and workers by supporting the stabilization fund to avoid layouts, layoffs and maintain the services our community relies on.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good afternoon, honorable mayor and constituents.
My name is Ibrahim Diallo.
Uh I live in San Jose.
Uh I'm here today to urge you guys to fight uh to stop the homelessness.
The United States is the biggest economy in the wood.
And the state of California, we refer it as the great state of California, where we live, is the fourth economy in the wood.
And many countries like the Scandinavian countries or other countries in the world do not have homelessness.
So if they were able to stop avoid or eradicate homeless homelessness, we should be able to eradicate and stop homelessness.
We can do better.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Yes.
So that's your time.
Your time is up.
Yes.
When each of you were sworn to office, you swore an oath to the U.S.
Constitution, the California Constitution, and on our city constitution, our city charter.
Mayor Mahan, I've heard you speak on the importance of honoring the will of the voters, the mandate, which is Measure I, a direct response to the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 approved by voters in November 2022, requiring the city council to adopt equity values, standards, and assessments and making certain decisions.
This includes the city budget.
This is also unanimously adopted by council.
This isn't an ordinance or a policy.
This is our city constitution.
The mandate applies to council and to staff.
So how will the decisions of today advance racial and social equity or improve or worsen it?
And as you stated, this is the beginning.
I, as well as the rest of San Jose, California.
Go ahead.
Good afternoon, Honorable Mayor and City Council.
I'm Dave Noel, a longtime resident, neighborhood leader, and president of the Orix and Neighborhood Association in District 9.
I urge you to support the mayor's budget priorities and strategies to achieve them.
In the past few years, we've implemented a focus on our residents' highest priorities, supported by metrics and accountability.
It is making a measurable difference in our quality of life and economy.
So please stay the course.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good evening, Mayor and Council members.
My name is Salma Cacobo.
I'm here to advocate for an affordability agenda in which our more vulnerable vulnerable families have access to affordable housing and rent control, medical attention, child care and groceries.
Please remember our more vulnerable families serve us all, either working on the fields, hotels, restaurants, cleaning or gardening services.
Please do trust to their labor.
Also, our young people, the future generations, they need solid education.
It's essential to create free programs where they have easy access to sports recreation or any extra good uh extracurricular activities.
Please help us to create programs where they can be out of the street.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Floor de Leon, Jonathan Borca, Sean Baker.
Come on down.
Go ahead.
Thank you.
Good afternoon.
My name is Zofisa Pati.
I am the IRC lead at Asian Americans for Community Involvement and a member of the real coalition and a resident of DA.
The council memorandum appropriately emphasizes prevention and community investment, including protecting programs such as Project Hope and strengthening youth programming.
However, the mayor's budget message continues to prioritize enforcement-based strategies and expanded surveillance technologies while investing comparatively less in community-based responses.
San Jose and Santa Clara have made important progress in developing alternative crisis response programs such as trust, which connects residents experiencing mental health crises with appropriate care rather than relying solely on police response.
Protecting and expanding programs like trust would improve outcomes.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Council members.
By the way, happy St.
Patty's Day.
One of the most important things San Jose can do to address our affordability crisis is to remove the unnecessary barriers to building homes.
Streamlining approvals and cutting fees will unlock projects that have been stuck in the pipeline and help bring more housing online and faster.
We will continue to see our communities, young families leave San Jose if we don't stop talking about it and start removing the barriers to housing production.
The mayor's budget message continues the work and keeps the city focused on increasing housing production.
I urge the council to support the mayor's March budget message.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hello.
Hello, I'm Day Ogustine, the family child care home provider for 18 years and a constituent of Council Member Domingo Candeles.
I'm here to ask the council to accept the child care policy opportunities status report.
Child care remains one of the biggest economic hurdles family face in our community.
Too often, parents are forced to reduce their work hours or leave the workforce entirely because they cannot find or afford child care.
Our continued the continued lack of access to subsidized child care.
This proportionately impacts families, our colors, and contributes to a cycle where children fall behind early in their education.
Thank you, that's your time.
Next speaker.
Mayor, Vice Mayor, Council members.
Um I'm here to speak in support of the mayor's uh budget message.
Um, and I also want to thank you for the improving unhouse situation in my neighborhood in Berriesa, as well as the uh condos I see going up uh along the light rail corridors on Capitol Avenue and the returning vibrancy in the shopping areas in that same corridor.
You have a very difficult job with the budget.
It's a lot of uh priorities that you're managing with very limited resources, but I ask you to continue us on the path that we've had for the last few years.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
Um, before you start, Ashley Antonich Sarabia, Kylie Clark, and Jean Cook.
Go ahead.
Good evening, everyone.
My name is Flor de Leon.
I am a community member in the side of San San Jose with Somos Mayfair and the Youth Building Peace Coalition.
As you may know, we'll be we we have been working tireless to open up Maxa Community Center.
I am today here to ask you for your support to prioritize funds to revitalizar Maxa Community Center, stand up for our children's or youth.
And it's overdue.
I don't know if you guys know you guys don't know this, but I know a lot of families that had kids that had commit suicides in our neighborhood.
We don't have the space.
We don't have open space for them, and I think if we uh rebuild Mazda, our community sector will provide a safe space safe space for these kids.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Good evening.
My name is Sean Baker from District 5.
Uh, last year you allocated a million dollars for the funding for deportation, defense legal services, know your rights outreach, and the rapid response network.
I really appreciate that.
I'd like you to do it again.
Uh I also support the mayor's commitment to raising an additional 500k in philanthropy.
And finally, I'm asking you to support the real coalition's priorities for housing affordability, homelessness prevention, and support for families, youth, and older adults.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Um, I'd also like to call Mateo Colson and Mike Krause.
Good afternoon, Mayor Mayhan and City Council.
With an impossible 45 seconds, I'll get straight to it.
My name is Jonathan Francisco Borca, and I'm speaking on behalf of the San Jose Public Library Foundation.
We understand this is a difficult budget year with very real trade-offs.
We appreciate the mayor's messaging pointing to a longer-term library funding solution and the co-authored memo by Councilmember Gandalas, Campos Ortiz, Duan and Casey prioritizing library hours and investments.
But these signals only make it more important to protect our libraries now.
Libraries are one of the public services residents rely on daily for learning, technology, job seeking, safety, and connection.
Last year alone, we had more than 3.8 million visitors and serve more than 755,000 cardholders.
Our ask is simple.
Please keep library funding flat and avoid further cuts.
San Jose residents use, need, and deeply value their libraries.
We ask that that budget reform.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor Maehan and members of the council.
My name is Jean Cook.
I am a San Jose resident and technology executive who has spent my career building platforms that create opportunity.
And I'm here to support the mayor's budget priorities.
This technology will reshape how cities operate and people work faster than most of us can imagine.
We need to engage proactively so our workforce can adapt and thrive.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hi, my name's Ashley Antonich Sarabia.
I'm a rapid responder and a resident of District 5.
I'm here today to ask you to preserve the $1 million in funding allocated last year to deport for deportation defense legal services, know your rights outreach, and the rapid response network.
I'm a fourth generation San Josean.
I'm the proud daughter of a Mexican American combat veteran.
As such, I know that San Jose, our great city of San Jose, was built by immigrants, and they're the reason we continue to thrive.
Now, when they're under attack, when our neighbors are under attack, we owe it to them to stand up, fight back, and continue to fund these services to do what we can to save them.
In addition, finally, please support the real coalition letter.
And Matt, thank you so much for raising or committing to raise 500,000.
I've seen what you can raise in one month.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Carlos Marillo, Angela Elsey, Neil Collins, and Brian Porz.
Come on down.
Good afternoon.
I'm Kylie Clark with SVCN and the Real Coalition.
I want to remind you all that affordability pressures in San Jose are not evenly distributed.
Rising housing cost displacement and economic instability disproportionately affect black residents, Latino residents, immigrant communities, and other historically marginalized groups who face decades of housing discrimination and unequal access.
In San Jose, black households experience some of the highest rates of rent burden, displacement risk, and housing instability.
As the city evaluates difficult budget decisions, it should do so consistent with the racial and social equity ordinance and the equity values and standards policy.
These require the city to identify and address policies that exacerbate disparities and to center the needs of communities most impacted by inequity.
Budget decisions should thank you.
That's your time.
Shirley Stager, Matt Hammer, and Ekemi.
Go ahead.
Hello, Mayor and Council.
My name is Mateo Colson, and I am a student at Santa Clara University, and I am also in their student government.
I'm here today to speak in support of the mayor's March budget message.
Despite economic uncertainty and a projected budget shortfall, it's essential that we remain focused on growing the local economy to support jobs and students, especially for young adults and students like me looking for work in a tight job market.
Let's streamline the storefront activation grant program and seek philanthropic partnerships to aid more businesses without straining the city budget.
We should also build on our boom for our local economy with a long-term vision for a downtown sports and entertainment district to attract more private investment, more tourism, and boost our economy.
Vote yes.
Good evening, Mayor and Council.
Uh my name is Mike Krauss, and I'm the president of the Penitencia Neighborhood Association in District 4.
Uh I'm also a member at large with the Barry S Citizen Advisory Committee.
I am also the board of directors for the Barriest Art Festival Foundation.
I say this just to emphasize the fact that I do have my ear to the ground with community.
And I can tell you that I'm here to support the mayor's budget.
Okay.
Um for this year.
But the budget continues to focus on the priority of not only me, but also the community members that I engage with.
Those are the reducing homeless.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor, City Council.
My name is Neil Collins.
I'm the CEO of the Santa Clara County Association of Realtors and a resident of D10.
Uh I'm here tonight to support the mayor's budget message.
Uh specifically his commitment to build more housing by streamlining services, deferring payment of impact fees, and providing more transparency to home builders.
In addition, San Jose has a chance to lead the way once again by creating an ADU home ownership program for first-time home buyers.
So let's continue to do the good work and stay focused on the priority of our residents.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hello, my name is Shirley Steger, and I'm living in District 10.
And recently, our community has been able to participate in some wonderful activities sponsored by the city.
As a volunteer with housing for 25 plus years now, I have I'm excited to witness that many of our homeless are now housed.
Also with a growth in low income housing, yet we still have a lot to do.
With a major city deficit, the mayor's proposed budget with focus on back to basics.
I support safety, fire, police.
And also got your time.
Oh thank you.
Next speaker.
Fernando, I can't read the last name on Fernando, but Fernando, come on down.
Greg Huascar Castro and Irene Zuniga.
Go ahead.
Good afternoon.
I'm a community volunteer in San Jose.
And uh first, I want to support the memo proposed by Council members Ortiz Campos, Casey Duan and uh Candelas, and ask that you um follow through on the affordability agenda.
Um we need to be frugal, yes, but we can't withstand blind cuts.
We need effective creative solutions like the modernization, like the work working families housing initiative and the uh investing in the youth master plan.
Um, second, I want to request that you not only preserve the one million dollar funding allocation to immigration services, um, but also the additional five hundred thousand.
Um, their programs, uh Amigos de Guadalupe are is a national example of protecting our communities and make me proud to live in San Jose San Jose.
So please help them.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Happy uh St.
Patrick's Day to you all.
Mayor, Vice Mayor, City Council members.
I want to speak in support of the mayor's uh budget message.
I appreciate the efforts that have gone into the cleaning up of the city and handling the home homelessness situation over the last year, primarily based on the buzzet message from last year.
I now is not the time to take the uh our sights off of the in goal here.
We have a lot more to do.
As you've heard, we've made progress.
Please continue to do to do it and support the mayor's budget message.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hello, thank you for your strength in continuing to listen to all that we have to share.
Uh Kemi with IPEN and also a volunteer with the Rapid Response Network, and I'm here to share the real coalition's concrete priorities that stabilize households, which are essential for stabilizing our community.
First, expand funding for the homelessness prevention system and related stabilization programs with flexible support to keep families in their homes.
Second, pilot a code enforcement linked right to council program so that tenants facing displacement due to code enforcement actions have access to legal representation.
Third, sustain and strengthen violence prevention and youth programs, including community-based initiatives and such as BEST.
And finally, maintain and expand immigrant.
Thank you.
That's your time.
GFM, Aurelia Sanchez, Citali Martinez, and Ashley Guerrero come on down.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.
My name is Samuel Lopez.
I'm with the Barrier Council Economic Institute.
This budget represents an important step towards addressing several of San Jose's most urgent and interconnected challenges, reducing unsheltered homelessness, increasing housing production, strengthening public safety, and supporting a resilient local economy.
Increasing housing supply is one of the most effective long-term strategies for reducing unsheltered housing, as it makes it easier to deliver new housing, especially options such as the ADUs and interim housing.
The city can help relieve pressure across the entire housing system and create more pathways for residents to move indoors.
At the same time, policies that improve coordination, streamline processes, and reduce unnecessary barriers also contribute directly to public safety.
When communities are stable and more residents have access to housing and when projects can move forward efficiently, we see a stronger, safer neighborhoods overall.
This budget also thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Thank you that your time.
Next speaker.
And I'm here to request that child care be one of your budget priorities to prevent more providers like us from having to close our businesses to working partnerships.
As we all continue to understand what the effects of affordability are, we see those really big impacts and components like housing care and programs for youth services.
Really, we should be looking at how this budget can tackle those issues and in looking at priorities such as working families housing, which is going to help unlock tools to further the feasibility of affordable and mixed income housing that is union built and providing good jobs.
In that, we'd like to express our support for the memo put together by Council Members Candelas, Ortiz, Casey Duan and Campos, and also would like to thank the mayor for incorporating the recommendations around working families housing into his updated memo as well.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good evening, leaders.
GFM communications coordinator at Housing Choices, standing with the Rio Coalition.
At Housing Choices, we support individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities who face even greater barriers to finding and keeping housing.
With billions in federal cuts to Medicaid, we must act intentionally at the local level to support the disability community who rely not only on affordable housing, but also accessibility, cross-disciplinary services, and long-term supports.
This makes investing in homelessness prevention more critical than ever.
Budget is never easy, but please prioritize the three P's of housing.
Older multifamily buildings often provide some of the most affordable options for low-income residents with disabilities.
If these homes are lost due to redevelopment without strong protections, a surge in homelessness is inevitable.
We support Council Member Campos Menmo.
Thank you all for your work.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Hello, my name's Aurelia Santos, and I live in District Three.
I'm here to support the mayor's budget because it's going to this is just as good as it's gonna get.
So what I'm here for is to support the budget, but also to caution people.
Don't spend more than what we have.
Especially me as a senior.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Um Valeria Carlos, Juan Carlos, Audrey, Quiroz, and Sonal Nayar Lee.
Come on down.
All right.
Hi, my name is Ashley Guerrero, and I'm a I'm here with the Youth Building Peace Coalition, and I'm proud to serve as a youth organizer with Jovenus Activos at Somos Mayfair.
Over the last year, I've had the privilege of working with the young people in Hoveness Activos, and I'm here today to urge that you invest in our future, which is our youth.
Young people have been organizing through the Youth Building Peace Coalition, including folks like CFJ, raising the bar, um next door solutions, but without investment in efforts like the Children and Youth Master Plan, programs like best that support Joveness Activos and spaces like the Max Youth Center, we risk leaving them behind.
We support the member by Campos Ortiz Candelas Don and Casey to ensure investment in youth well-being.
So young people in San Jose have safe, supportive places to go.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Vice Mayor and Council members.
Thank you very much for being here.
I'm a resident of San Jose, and I'm really proud to be in San Jose because San Jose is paving the way for uh a lot of our issues, housing affordability, reducing homelessness and safer neighborhoods.
So I strongly urge uh council support mayor's March budgets.
Uh just San Jose itself has 1500 approved ADUs, that's possibly uh 1500 families that can move in there.
So that's a part of uh uh mayor's budget to make uh ADUs homeownership a possibility.
So we support it, we love it, and then we're very proud of San Jose.
I think we're leading the way for a lot of cities, so keep it up.
You guys are doing great, thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.
Um, I'm here with Joveness Activos to advocate for youth.
Youth is our future, and we definitely need to start prioritizing prevention over incarceration.
Um we definitely need to start funding um spaces for them to be safe, for them to grow, to learn, to be the future of this community that we want to see.
Um, and also for housing, once they grow up, it's very hard for them during college to get housing, to be able to afford staying here in their community.
We need to focus on um alternative housing, like housing co-ops, like New York is doing.
So we definitely need to start funding a lot of these things that will definitely make a clear change.
So thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
I'd also like to call I think it's Tashel.
Um I couldn't read the handwriting on Nav hints uh, so I'm not sure if I said the first name correctly.
And Dave Luhan, come on down.
Go ahead.
Hola, my number is Valeria Yesuke.
Um ahead.
Just like my name is Juan Carlos, and I am in seventh grade.
Hello, my name is Juan Carlos, and I am in seventh grade.
I'm here to ask for your support for young people for my family like mine.
I collect bottles to help my parents so they can pay the rent.
And I, and at the same time, I are you there?
I'm alas, Escuela Para Ayudar a Miss.
For everyone.
Next speaker.
This help creates.
Good afternoon, Mayor and City Council members.
My name is Audrey Kiros, and I'm with the Youth Building Peace Coalition.
I'm calling on city leaders to prioritize youth mental health and substance use prevention in the budget.
We need a city youth empowerment fund that invests in youth-led programs, mentorship, counseling, and leadership development.
We must also invest in youth community spaces like the Maxau Youth Center, which are safe spaces where youth can gather, learn, and receive support while staying away from harmful environments.
Finally, the youth master plan must be expanded with long-term funding, not short-term solutions, because our well-being should always be a priority.
This matters to me because I've been able to learn and grow as a leader, building up the courage to come here and ask you prioritize investing in youth centers like Maxa.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hello, Mayor and Council.
My name is Sonal, and I'm a resident of District 2.
I'm here to support the Mayor's budget.
Uh, even with the current budget challenges, it's important that we focus on what the residents care about the most, and that is to keep our communities safe and clean.
Uh illegal dumping is a real issue in many of our neighborhoods, and it's frustrating when it takes weeks for action to be taken.
A simple and practical improvement would be to allow beautified San Jose teams to send warning notices sooner.
Reducing response times from two months to about ten days would help in preventing decent dumping and make our neighborhoods cleaner faster.
Thank you.
Thank you, next speaker.
I'd also like to call my final two cards, you Lalia and Joanne Pascual.
I have now called all 186 cards that were submitted.
If you did not hear your name, this is your opportunity to line up.
Go ahead.
Hello, Mayor and Council members.
I'm Toshal and a resident of District 2.
I'm here to support the direction outlined in Mayor's March budget completely.
The direction to review spending for efficiencies, product services, and look for reasonable new revenue sources is a responsible approach.
Public safety, housing, homelessness solutions, and neighborhood quality of life will ensure limited resources are used where they make the biggest difference.
I encourage the council to support this framework and continue working towards a balanced budget that protects essential services while keeping San Jose moving forward.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Hello, Mayor and Council.
My name is Nahun.
I'm here to support the mayor's message.
Even with economic uncertainty, it's important that we stay focused on the results our residents are asking, especially in regards to unshelter hopelessness.
As we see, that's been proven that reducing it has been solvable, especially with people sleeping outside, has dropped about 10% since Mayor Mahan has been in office with priorities and actions taking charge, along with a thousand new shelter placements last year being made.
Thank you, next speaker.
Good evening, Council.
My name is Dave Luhan.
I'm the founding member and executive secretary of the Monterey Quarter Business Association, the MCBA, and I'm here today to urge the council to support the mayor's budget message as proposed.
We are facing a difficult deficit, but this budget focuses on the basics that every resident and business deserves.
First, public safety.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
So, Mother, here in San Jose, many families are struggling to get ahead.
Many parents cannot work because they do not have access to child care, and this puts them at risk of losing their homes.
That's why I'm here today to ask the city council to direct the city manager to include child care as a priority in the budget.
Gracias.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Access to child care is not a luxury.
It is a necessity so that families can work.
Fatal hit and run on 680 off ramp claims life of 63-year-old San Jose woman.
Woman fatally struck by vehicle while crossing 101 in San Jose.
The driver, a 24-year-old San Jose man, attempted to avoid the collision but struck the pedestrian.
He remained at the scene and cooperated with investigators.
My plea to this council is to put immediate and additional funding into beautify San Jose's partnerships with Caltrans to remove every encampment along every off-ramp above every freeway in San Jose.
We are at a crisis point.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Council members.
My name is Daphne Hernandez.
I'm a youth leader with Joven and Sactivos and with the Youth Building Coalition.
Today we are calling city leaders to prioritize youth mental health and substance use prevention in the budget.
If we had youth centers like Maxa, I would receive the support and resources needed outside of school to help me achieve my dream of becoming an immigration lawyer.
Being first generation, I see the issues facing my community and my own family.
My parents on a small stand where they work countless hours to provide my for my sisters and and me.
The fear of ice is a constant pressure that affects my family, not knowing if something will happen.
Reminds me of the same fear affecting my community and other youth my age.
There are many youth who live on the streets, nowhere to go, and no one to talk to.
How can you thank you?
That's your time.
Next speaker.
I'm sorry, that's your time.
Next speaker.
Stop talking resources from the name is Oscar Queros Mandrano.
I'm a coordinator with Solomon's Mayfair.
We have the same conversation every year.
And uh I take a moment just uh for us to think outside the box.
You come and listen to us every year, you come in and hear communities saying, Oh, we need you to fund this, we need you to fund this.
But at the same time, what are we doing to really reimagine the opportunities in front of us?
If certain campaigns can raise millions of dollars, why can't our city officials raise the same amount of money needed to support our communities?
If tech billionaires are willing to support campaigns, how come they can't support our youth?
How come they can't fund other resources needed in our community?
Instead, we're here um playing catch-up for a long history of disinvestment.
And so I urge you to really think outside the box now that you sit in that position.
Thank you.
Next speaker.
Good afternoon, Council members.
My name is Michelle Ortega, and I'm the youth core the youth program coordinator at Salmos Mayfer.
I urge you to prioritize funding for the youth programming and MAXA in San Jose.
Investing in our youth people youth um is one of the most impactful decisions we can make to strengthen our community, both now and in the future.
Accessible well-funded youth programs and centers provide safe spaces where young people can learn growth and build meaningful meaningful connections.
Without these opportunities, many youth, especially those in underserved neighborhoods, are left without constructive outlets to support our systems.
This lack of access can increase vulnerable vulnerability to substance youth involvement in harmful activities and untreated mental health challenges.
Thank you.
That's your time.
Back to council.
All right.
Coming back to the council.
Thank you to everyone who addressed the council this evening.
That was a great turnout and great range of issues and perspectives.
I think you're speaking at open forum was my recollection.
That's at the end of the meeting.
Sorry, sir.
Okay.
Um so we're gonna continue on with the budget, uh, March budget message item.
Uh I gave some opening remarks, so I'll uh turn to colleagues now, and we'll start with Councilmember Condelas.
Um thank you.
Um I wanna I want to start off by thanking uh everybody who came out to speak, especially our youth.
Um you know, especially joven que habló con la collection de los botes, para ir a los papás pagar la renta.
I hear you.
So for my colleagues who read it, uh the young man who came out to speak in Spanish actually said that he goes out and collects cans to to trade in and and help the family pay the rent.
And and so um it uh that's that's uh it gets me emotional because that that's indicative of of the in income inequality that we're seeing, the um all the all the reports that we read, whether it's from uh the the Silicon Valley Pain Index.
Um and so I I hear you and you know uh you know I'm I'm I'm happy that our our youth and and everybody came out to speak on this, and and this is um uh you know a great start, an engaged start to a process that I'm glad the mayor mentioned it is um is just the beginning.
And so I hope to see the young people involved and continue to come out as we um not just you know kick off the March budget message a conversation, but the study sessions, um the the town halls that we all put together so we can hear from you after the budget is a little bit more baked, so we can hear from you.
Um, you know, uh thankfully, you know, in in our city, I'm I'm a proud product of San Jose.
I love San Jose.
Um San Jose raised me, and we in our city have a um a different form of government, a a council manager form of government, a uh uh a government where the mayor leads the budget message, but this is the forum that we as a council get to engage in dialogue um and have an opportunity to revise and change the message as we deem advisable.
This is part of the democratic process, and you know, where in June we come away with a hopefully a highly collaborative final product that reflects our community's priorities.
So I I do want to thank folks who came out.
Um I also want to thank my colleagues uh for their work in the group memo we we put out last week.
Uh it was a sprint from when we uh got the budget message, uh, which was 41 pages.
Um and uh and we we put out something a few days later, and uh obviously it would not be possible without the help of you know Jim Shannon, Lee Wilcox, and members of the city manager's office um that helped us collaborate as we put together a quite frankly a substantial um uh document that was rooted in reality.
And you know, it it reflects priorities that we hear from from our residents.
Uh but you know, I think it was because of that collaboration with the administration, it's it's things that could be absorbed by staff and provides more more more important flexibility to the administration.
Uh and I'm proud that we did that due diligence.
It was tough.
We can you know just put some something on a memo, not run it by the uh city administration's office and and watch it tank, but that's not what we did.
Um and uh you know I'm proud that the goal of our memorandum was to reduce the cost burden on our residents while preventing layoffs to the maximum extent possible while protecting core services in the focus areas.
We heard a lot about that on uh from from people commenting and you know, I I I did appreciate the initial budget message's direction that you know heard our voice pertaining to youth investments, support for small businesses, as well as funding for our immigrant community.
While we know that we're in a difficult fiscal year uh with uh $56 million deficit, um uh you know it's important uh for us to stick up for our policies in areas that are just and aligned with our values and uh and are reflected in our priorities and hope um that when this comes back to us, they're protected uh in and and baked into that to that budget.
But you know, I'm I'm I'm a realist, we understand the trade-offs, uh, but I'm also I'm an optimist and know that uh hopefully um uh the the economic conditions improve, our sales tax uh numbers improve and and property tax values improve, and hopefully we get uh some revenues to hopefully lessen that blunt.
Um I do want to start off with the initial recommendation uh for half half a million dollars uh to advance the children and youth services master plan.
Uh, you know, it's a positive step and something that I've mentioned, and um, you know, I think it signals to our young people that it deserves thoughtful and coordinated investment.
Uh but the reality is our our our Brown Act group didn't think it was enough.
You know, we know our master plan uh is rooted in data, in uh community input and the realities of our of our families, and and you know, it also identifies where certain gaps exist, and that's why you know we called for for more money to that.
recommendation uh for half half a million dollars uh to advance the children and use services master plan uh you know it's a positive step and something that I've mentioned and um you know I think it signals to our young people that it deserves thoughtful and coordinated investment uh but the reality is our our our Brown app group didn't think it was enough you know we know our master plan uh is rooted in data in uh community input and the realities of our of our families and and you know it also identifies where certain gaps exist and that's why you know we called for for more money to that um and I I I guess uh I I I see the mayor's uh uh supplemental memorandum and and I guess I have a question for the administration um on the idea maybe angel um you can speak to this um on the possible source of funding coming coming from opioid settlement funds to to bolster and or see seeing if we can utilize some of those funds to to maybe give the administration some flexibility to come back to us I would curious your thoughts on that.
Yeah well the thing about uh angel real s city manager um think about the opioid settlement funds is that there has to be a direct correlation between prevention and abuse of opioid either use or abuse um we we're definitely open open to exploring that possibility um there may be a little something there I don't think there's gonna be a whole lot there but uh definitely worth exploring thank you angel no I appreciate that thank you angel and this is something that we've all talked about and and uh and and appreciate um that feedback and I I I will you know um as I as I hear from the rest of my colleagues think about how we can uh use this specificity to give give that flexibility to the administration to hopefully bolster um the the amount we're providing for our children use services master plan so thank you angel um you know I I also want to uh bring up uh I I want to note the effort again that the mayor brought forth with the uh collective priorities and revisions to the budget message through his memo uh and I do have a question mayor um memo 2A uh your your directive specifically on the deference language uh for example 13 14 and 15 of our group mag memo appendix page five uh there was a comment it's it's regarding the code enforcement modernization um there was comments that there was concerns on resources um and our direction explicitly cited these considerations as directed as feasible if you could walk me through how this would work um as proposed here by your blue memo if there's language that's conflicting I I I'd like to get a little bit more clarity on that council member can we just remind me which recommendations did you say was it 13 13, 14 and 15 of our group memorandum in the in the explanation it's it's it explicitly says this concept is aligned with ongoing code enforcement modern modernization efforts but resource constraints limits staff staff's ability to take on a separate body of work and so uh we were cognizant of that not to overload the administration's you know um work plan and so we were flexible in our in our language as we directed it to make sure that we gave the administration as much flexibility uh to be able to put forth um uh you know the these proposals as feasible and in consideration of budgetary constraints we explicitly called it out and so curious as to you know um you know what what what what that means if you're if it's I know it says it's not in integrated into your budget message but it's in as part of the it's already part of the work stream so yeah that is one that I did not include in the reconciliation memo because there is ongoing code enforcement modernization work but limited resources and specifically the concept of tenant habit of habitability plans is something that feels overly prescriptive and that staff does uh is unlikely to have the capacity to take on this year so it given the unusual we've never before in the history of March budget messages that I've seen seen the level of additional direction come in through memos uh from council so we did our best to work with staff to understand what would be feasible to evaluate between before between now and the June message but really it's the it's the May proposed budget that needs to come out and then just make trade-offs as best as we could but um the feeling was that we should let staff continue their efforts to modernize code and give them maximum flexibility.
And uh, you know, our ask was feasibility and considerations uh of the budget.
And so, you know, I I think it's worthwhile while it this, you know, you know, I understand the unprecedented nature of you know proposing uh policy during the March Must is clearly within our right as council um to do so.
And and while you know we did put forth a few directives, you know, we uh we had 41 pages, 85 directives that we called out from uh you know from the from the from the memo from your initial budget message.
So we we thought it was important enough to to be able to think creatively while not hindering staff's ability to to bring bring back something and say, hey, it's not feasible, or you know, uh we we're in a budget year, so we're in a budget deficit here.
It's hard to bring that forward.
So I um I'm curious as to why we would have to do that.
Yeah, I mean, look, we can we can certainly add additional concepts.
Here's the cost though.
Because the charter directs the mayor to bring forward this message.
We start often two to three months before and do a very deep dive on trade-offs and look specifically at staff's capacity to evaluate all of the concepts in the message between the adoption of the message in March and the city manager bringing forward a proposed budget in May.
So we're trying to slim it down enough.
We had the issue, as folks will remember, a year or two ago, might have been last year, of having like 60 MBAs, and we got to a point where city staff was spending so much time doing policy research before we got to the June message that we were being directly traded off with actually doing work that we had directed the previous year.
So my attempt, and look, we only had the weekend to put together this reconciliation memo uh and had limited time to really analyze it, but we did our very best to include as much as we could while also keeping the scope manageable based on the actual availability of staff resources for additional policy.
Now that's that's fair, Mayor.
I would I would I would ask that um as part of the consideration for this item specifically, and I'll I'll I'll I'll wait to hear from the rest of my colleagues, but you know, I think it's worth the the research from staff given the issues and you know the idea, you know, we we we we agree we need to focus on strengthening our our uh our code enforcement division and and I think um you know there's a lot of things that we could that we could do as part of uh as part of this item, specifically 1213, 14, and even 15 for that matter, um, that I would um ask for for you know consideration um to to consider.
I'm not saying implement it, but it's worth knowing as as decision as a policymakers what the trade-offs and what the feasibility and what the budget constraints around these items are.
And so, anyways, I'll I'll leave that at uh I'll leave it, I'll leave that there and I'll I'll feel free to offer um you know uh a motion after I hear more of my colleagues, if not uh uh amendments.
Thank you, Mayor.
Thanks, Councilmember.
Yeah, and look when we get to a motion, happy to discuss where we might reintroduce scope.
Assuming the motion includes the March message and the reconciliation memo, that's a conversation we can have with staff.
But I'll just caution colleagues that the more that we add, the more that we tax staff that therefore can't do the things we directed last year because there's very finite staff capacity for management of programs, for communication with council offices, for research for new initiatives.
We just can't, there's a limit to how much scope we can add for just general exploration.
But um happy I'm sure we will have discussions about things that should be in or out here when as we talk about scope.
So let me go to Councilmember Ortiz next.
Thank you, uh Mayor, and uh thank you, Councilmember Condelas for eloquently sharing our our experience in the Brown Act.
Uh I want to thank you, Mayor, for incorporating several of the important recommendations from our our group memo and the March budget message.
Um and I also want to thank my colleagues in that Brown Act.
We we were uh we brought council members with very different perspectives into the same Brown Act, and I'm proud to say we came together with strong recommendations that all of us agreed on, and they were within the uh mayor's priority focus area.
So we really just want to thank my colleagues for their leadership and their their advocacy.
I appreciate the inclusion of direction to explore one-time funding for uh consultant services to develop a focused economic strategy for East San Jose.
Um, this is an important step towards addressing the historic underinvestment in district five.
And also just want to uh re mention that uh we do have a philanthropic partner who has committed to funding half of the funds needed for that consultant.
Uh I also want to thank uh the mayor for including recommendations 37 and 38 as it relates to workforce housing.
Housing affordability remains one of the biggest challenges facing our residents and exploring additional tools in the toolbox that can support production without adding more red tape for new development of housing is critical to solving this crisis.
Additionally, I appreciate the inclusion of direction related to small business safety.
Uh this is especially important for neighborhood commercial corridors, particularly on the east side where many of our immigrant and family-owned businesses operate.
We've all seen in the news recent robberies, targeting of Asipastos and Peter's Bakery in my district.
I know there was a uh business uh that was targeted um along Tully Road and District 8, and then right when we were first joining the council, La Placita uh in District 7 experienced a major mash uh smash and grab at their jewelry stores.
And so it's our responsibility as a council uh to respond to these concerns and and come up with solutions so that people feel safe come into the east side in order to shop at our our stores and visit our restaurants.
I also want to acknowledge that uh recommendation 25 from our group memo was partially integrated, and I appreciate that the amended language directs coordination with VTA and a report back during the EIFD study session in fall 2026.
Giving the um historic underinvestment in New San Jose, I see a TIFF or EIFD as a potential mechanism to bring in focused and concentrated funding, whether that's new housing, new commercial spaces, um, or just uh ways in which to improve our infrastructure.
I'd like to just clarify one point uh if I could.
Our original recommendation referenced SV at home because of their existing work uh and funding that they received from VTA to eval uh evaluate EIFDs across San Jose, including uh the transit-oriented preservation strategies.
Um our intent was to recognize and build on that partnership so that one, we're not you know, footing the whole bill for this study, and two, that we're not recreating the work.
So I just had a quick question for staff.
I don't know if Rosalyn or anybody uh could answer from the administration.
Thank you, Rosalind.
Um, but um, you know, we wanted to be very intentional with the language because I know originally in the March budget message from the mayor, his focus was specifically on downtown San Jose.
And given that Alam Rock has a few um of the transit uh uh stops that are are included uh um in the the growth areas.
I wanted to ask does this ex uh direction that was included in the blue memo from the mayor, does that include Alum Rock or should I be asking for a friendly amendment to include Alam Rock?
Thank you so much, Councilmember Ortiz.
Yes, our understanding is that the contract that VTA has with SV at home is to look at all of the transit-oriented communities actually throughout their entire network.
So that would include those sites along Alum Rock.
So I don't think this existing language needs to be amended.
Yeah, we that was our intention of what we wrote.
The reason we referenced VTA was to be all inclusive of their entire study, including their partners, which includes us via home and the and the geographies you're describing.
All right.
Just wanted to make sure I didn't miss this opportunity to get the the wheels turning from my district.
On page 12 of the city manager's budget request and five-year forecast, it notes that approximately uh 85 million will be retained by the city following the resolution of the state tax dispute and placed into the the budget stabilization reserve.
Given that these are one-time resources, this presents an opportunity for the council to consider whether a small portion could be used to support community priorities while still remaining strong, uh retaining strong reserve levels, which is important to me and I think important to the whole council.
But in particular, these one-time funds could help strengthen investments in areas we've already identified as priorities, including the support the support of the children and youth master plan uh and the stability of our immigrant families.
And so I just had a brief question for staff.
So, first if, and I guess to the city manager uh please, if if the full 85 million is added to the reserve, and I think we hit we had discussed that we would see it before uh uh the end of the budget cycle.
Um, and if we had the needed reserve levels as needed, um, could the could city staff or your office um explore funding uh fully funding the children and youth master plan and the uh already promised $500,000 uh to immigrant defense.
So thank you very much, council member for the question.
And I think the key word that you said is the word explore um because there's gonna be a lot of pressure on those reserve funds, which I think we outlined in the city manager's budget request.
Again, like you said, we need to get our reserves back up.
We have some capital projects that are imminent that we need and some deferred maintenance we need to address as well.
Uh we may want to spread some of our cuts over two years on a one-time basis to ease into some of them again to uh help the transition.
But yes, uh, you know, we always can explore uh that those type of items um and it gives us flexibility to see if it can fit or it can't fit and and look and make our recommendation accordingly.
Um the already, I think in the March budget message with the money that's um been uh that's been already called for some of that would need to come out of those funds already.
Um so um because we don't have an another big pot of one-time funds, but uh we can certainly explore that.
Yes, I I understand we have budget constraints, and you know, I just want to make sure if if the city is seen probably this once-in-a-lifetime allocation of $85 million, if just one million dollars can be allocated uh to defend some of our most vulnerable um populations.
And I appreciate the administration's um willingness to at least explore and and consider that, and I'll be sure to be laser-focused on that discussion as the um the budget conversation moves forward.
Um, and then I just uh in regards to that, I just have a few other uh questions.
Um, first, if if the um if the 85 million does come through, and we do see that, um, and then we have funds to be used for one-time service stabilization.
Could we put aside like maybe 30 million to make sure that we we avoid cuts to services to our residents?
Um I would not recommend that because that would you'd be working with an un uh an unbalanced budget structurally, and that is the worst situation to be in.
We need to structurally balance our budget given we've got a big shortfall looming the next fiscal year, and so we need to balance ongoing uh revenues with ongoing expenses, and so yes, in a very limited way, could we use some money to transition, but given the size of that re given the size of that reserve, the fact that our budget stabilization reserve is only at twelve and a half million, the risks right now that we're facing potentially, which we outlined in the city manager's budget request to our revenue sources, I wouldn't recommend setting aside that money.
Although we will be very conscious, as I said, um, you know, when we were going over our priority setting, you know, it's our goal to be as invisible as possible to the community in the budget cuts that we're gonna put forward to you, although some will be painful.
There's a constituent for everything, we don't we don't provide enough services, obviously, to our community, and I would like to minimize to the very extent possible any impacts to our employees.
So, with those two goals in mind, there will be some limited use of some transitional things that we might need a little bit more time to smooth out those budget proposals to make sure they're feasible.
Um, but that I do not believe there would be funding to set aside anything like that.
We would have zero reserves and we would not have the money to do infrastructure projects that we need to do.
Appreciate your your perspective, and I'll look forward to leaning into that conversation.
I say I got 40 seconds.
Um there hasn't been a motion yet, but I just want to sunlight that I would like to uh include whenever whoever makes the motion that as long as the city maintains the necessary reserve funds uh to please direct the city manager to consider the allocation of funding uh fully funding the children and youth master plan and uh fully funding our already promised $500,000 uh to defend our immigrant community.
Thank you so much.
Thanks, Councilmember.
Just made a note of that.
We will just make a clarification.
When you say fully fund the children and youth master plan, you're saying up to a million dollars.
Okay, just want to make sure that because it could really take a lot more money to do that.
Not the legal vote.
I was gonna put that on the record.
We we did it last year.
Yeah, thank you.
All right, Vice Mayor.
Thank you, Jennifer, actually, for asking that question.
I was wondering about that myself, what that means to fully fund actually anything at this point.
I want to thank all, although most of the people who spoke have now gone off to have dinner, I suppose.
But I do appreciate all that you have been here.
Uh and in particular, the voices of young people.
I spent three days last week working with 96 high school juniors from all over the city, and it's uh encouraging to listen to the dialogue, the input, the way that you think and why you think a certain way, and how you can influence the influence us as your local elected officials.
So I I truly appreciate that you're all here and you're still here.
And and as a mother and uh someone who supports children all my life, I sub certainly support the family youth master plan.
I'm just not sure about the million-dollar expenditures.
This is the last time that I have the opportunity to be part of the Mayor's March budget message.
I come to this with seven years of budget experience and 14 years prior to that with school board budgets.
Those school board budgets were adopted during the Great Recession and during unprecedented financial stress, much worse than what we're facing today.
This has been said previously, but I think it bears repeating.
We are in a very tough budget year with a shortfall larger than I've ever seen.
This is not the time to expand programs.
It's the time to draw back and focus on the city's core mission and priorities.
And we heard from the community what that is.
We've had surveys that shows that public safety and homelessness are among the top one and two.
The reality is that any expansion to a service or program will mean a cut to another existing city service.
It potentially means employee layoffs, residents losing services they currently depend upon, or drawing back on commitments we've made.
Instead, these are situations we should aim to avoid by focusing on preservation rather than expansion.
I appreciate and support the mayor's message because it has focus and is realistic about the financial limitations we face.
The message acknowledges that budgets mean weighing trade-offs and that resources are finite and need to come from somewhere.
I have to say that this is the most unique budget process that I've experienced.
In my seven years on council, while memo memos are always a part of the budget process.
That being said, there's a lot of good proposals and ideas in these council memoranda, and I appreciate my colleagues thinking proactively and creatively about the budget.
However, it's important again to return to the idea of trade-offs.
Expanded programs result in a sacrifice somewhere.
We need to very be very selective about what we choose to prioritize in the budget, since any decision we make will require a trade-off due to our limited resources.
It is not recommended nor prudent to ask staff to explore large service expansions when we know that we couldn't possibly afford to fund them.
To do so would be a dishonest to the public and to st and disingenuous to the city staff doing the work.
It would also be a poor use of staff time to have them analyze a program and service expansions that are unrealistic.
The mayor's March budget message is the first step in the budget process.
There will be future opportunities to refine and amend budget direction in June, actually, May study sessions, June, once we have received the proposed budget from the city manager.
I'd like to thank the mayor and his staff for their work to analyze all of the memoranda submitted and produce a supplemental memo that incorporates many of the proposals from these documents.
I know that the mayor's staff work hard to extend extensively vet every proposal in good faith with the assistance of city staff.
It's critical that the city manager have clear direction that has been fully vetted with the administration and city departments so that she can craft a proposed budget based on our direction.
The appendix attached to the mayor's supplemental memo does a good job of outlining all of the proposals, what is integrated and what isn't.
Obviously, we're in a Brown Act and have discussed including this language.
The omission from the original budget message was largely an oversight, and I appreciate you including it.
Very very important to me and our safety of our community.
The mayor does a good job of explaining in the supplemental why certain items aren't integrated into the budget message.
Oftentimes it comes down to resources and capacity, and that's financial resources and the capacity of our staffs.
As a council, we need to acknowledge that our capacity to do things as an organization is limited, and we cannot expand our city services significantly in the context of a budget shorefall.
This is especially true for services that fall out of our jurisdiction's purview and authority.
The supplemental memo from the mayor strikes a good balance between integrating various proposals from council while also remaining realistic about financial and staffing constraints.
While I support this mayor this message from the mayor, his supplemental, I really want to hear from my colleagues before I pursue a motion or hear what a motion is going to be crafted.
So for now, I'll leave it at that because I'd like to hear what everyone else has to say.
Thanks, Vice Mayor.
Councilmore Kamer.
Thank you so much.
I want to thank the mayor and his team for putting together the budget message as well as the additional supplemental memo.
I know they work throughout the weekend to be able to analyze everything.
And I also want to thank everyone who came today.
Uno de estos días, uno de ustedes, quizás dos, bangastaling esta mesa directiva.
So siempre mantenga fe siempre este involucrado.
Always have faith and always be involved because that's how you get your voices heard.
So I really appreciate you coming out and staying.
It means a lot.
We notice, by the way.
And I'd like to thank also Councilmember Mulcahy, the lone person who really put a lot out there.
So every one of us, I think, really put a lot of time, thought, and energy in this very, very challenging time.
So you know, I think that, you know, I see all of the work that was done.
I also want to thank the staff, because I know that many of us reach out to the to the city staff who are doing all this work to ensure that our memos uh are accurate.
Um, you know, I think this is going to be uh we've already said that it's a tough year.
Uh it's the toughest year I've seen in the last three years of of having budgets uh into my fourth budget now.
Uh, and you know, balance is going to be very hard, very hard.
Uh, but I think that there is a way of finding a pathway uh to do better for our youth, our families, and um our entire San Jose community uh by really safeguarding core essential services uh from the beginning.
I know that it's been a message, uh a March message of focusing, and although we want to do everything, uh we're not going to be able to.
Let's be realistic.
I think that we uh will do our best to do as much as we can with what we have.
Uh I also want to shout out to those who are uh thinking about revenue growth, and so encouraging and in fact investing in economic development development to increase growth is something that I know many of the staff and we are working on to be able to grow the pie.
Uh, that will give us an ability to do a lot more, so I appreciate that.
And um, I too will like to hear from the rest of my colleagues to see where we can move this forward.
So thank you very much.
Thanks, Councilmember.
Appreciate it.
Let me turn now to Councilmember Campos.
Thank you, um, Mayor and colleagues uh for putting together this March budget message.
There are elements I support, including the incorporation of the updated budget principles to guide the city manager as she does the hard work of putting together a balanced budget.
I also really appreciate the support from your office, mayor, for the budget community gathering space that we've put together for members of the community to use while they participate in this public discussion.
I want to thank Councilmembers Ortiz, Duane, Candelas, and Casey who collaborated in good faith to put together recommendations that we felt would address our community's top concerns.
The cost of living has become an increasing challenge for thousands of families across the city, and our joint memo seeks to recognize and elevate this reality in the context of our work on the budget.
And while we don't always agree, I'm thankful for your partnership and your willingness to compromise.
And most importantly, I want to thank the members of the public and everyone in our community who provided input during this process.
I'm grateful for the passion and the patience from Dear 2 residents and other district two neighbors who are hosting the One Brandom Lane Emergency Interim Housing Community.
Very thankful for the partnership and leadership of ESA, the One Brand of Lane Community Advisory Committee that has worked with my office, the mayor's office, city staff and life moves staff, to address concerns and ensure the success of this emergency shelter.
And although we all worked hard, we have come to the shared conclusion that the best next step is to convert this emergency shelter into permanent housing.
So I am grateful for the assistance of our housing department and director Eric Sullivan in putting together the memo to begin this critical work.
Many district two neighborhood leaders have also shared their frustration with the reduction in funding for the very successful beautify SJ grant program.
That is why I'm proud to support a recommendation in our joint memo that restores funding for this program to ensure that more neighborhood associations benefit from that investment and opportunity for community building.
And before I provide comments on the recommendations from our joint memo, I do have a few questions I'd like to ask staff.
First, I'd like to clarify this recommendation is uh on recommendation 29.
It is not a recommendation to allocate or direct the $500,000 from the mayor's budget memo to FFN, but it is asking city staff to provide alternatives and options, for example, looking at philanthropic funding or a nonprofit or partner agency who can administer this program.
So recommendation 29 in the joint memos to quote provide alternative options to sustain the family friends and neighbors FFN Caregiver Support Network.
My question to staff is whether this language is overly prescriptive.
I'll take that one.
I don't think so.
Thank you.
Um second question based on the proposed direction in the amended budget message.
Can staff provide the assurance that the effort to pursue conversion of EIH into permanent housing will prioritize one Branham Lane.
I can answer that.
Yes, it will.
Thank you.
My last question.
Uh, recommendation 2A in the mayor's blue memo reads Should any direction between the mayor's March budget message and these memos be substantially similar, the mayor's March budget scope and wording of direction will take precedents' precedence.
How does staff interpret this and how would you implement the direction if approved by council?
Yeah, I'll try to take that one.
So I think um yeah, I mean, I think to the extent that those just uh restating the message there to the extent that there is significant overlap, um, I think staff would look at the language in the March budget message as the the primary direction, and we would incorporate the um the additional direction in the in the other Brown Act memo as to help support that that direction, and we would be reporting it if it was feasible, and we'd be reporting that as part of our normal council referral process.
Thank you for clarifying that.
Um I appreciate your your responses.
And finally, I want to speak to one recommendation in our joint memo that is very important to me.
Recommendation 28 is to introduce a problem statement in the growing our economy focus area related to accessing affordable child care.
And I appreciate and thank my colleagues for the thoughtful remarks during item 3.4 earlier today.
I want to clarify that I am not proposing a significant and ongoing investment in child care subsidies or programs.
Instead, I want to reiterate that the intent is to create the market conditions that support child care businesses.
For example, in addition to implementing AB 7752 to allow child care centers to be co-located with multifamily housing by right, we must update council policy 614 guidelines for child daycare, which imposes land use regulations governing child care operators.
The last time this council policy was updated was over 20 years ago in 2003.
This policy and other local land use regulations make it harder for child care operators to do business in this city.
A new problem statement allows city staff to think about these regulations and others identifying updates and modifications that make San Jose more friendly for child care businesses.
And as a council that is attentive to the affordability concerns of our business owners and residents, and as a city committed to generating opportunities that help stabilize our budget in the future years, a stronger understanding of how child care breakdowns impact working parents, their employers, and the city's local economy is necessary to explore the depths of this issue.
Similarly, as we discussed item 3.3, the city also provides direct services, including the FFN program, which is an early childhood workforce development program that meets the diverse training and support needs of caregivers who then improve the learning and care environments of our city's children.
These are small business owners and operating, including over 640 caregivers that have worked with over 2,000 children in our city.
These small business owners benefit from training and child development and support through the permitting and licensing processes.
It is a return on investment that is significant and noteworthy because we are the only city, to my knowledge, in the state of California and the nation who has a program like this.
It is hard to think of other programs that for half a million dollars provide tangible and ongoing support to over 600 businesses and 2,000 children that allows parents and the guardians of those kids to go to work or school.
If we are serious about improving the economic future of our city and our families, we cannot undermine the importance of and the urgency to begin exploring child care policy opportunities today.
Adding a problem statement or a priority in the growing our economy focus area related to accessing affordable child care does not mean significant and unsustainable funding for subsidies.
It simply means that staff can think about what is within our control, including land use and zoning regulations and support for small businesses.
Thank you, and I look forward to continuing this dialogue.
Thanks, Councilmember.
So manager, do you want to just comment on how you interpret that last one of adding additional problem statements to the focus areas?
Well, I'm just uh I am in I totally understand as I obviously as a working mother and you know my own issues that I've had with child care as as my kids were young, having three children, I totally uh totally understand it as I think all the mothers and and uh and and the fathers do as well.
Um I am just in general concerned in in a in a totality type of way about adding a lot of new things when I'm gonna have to reduce staff in in this, and I think there will be that any new policy direction in our in our focus areas, which you know I'd like to try to uphold as much as we can there, but they're probably gonna have to be reduced when we bring back an MBA about what are all our goals and and uh and things that we're gonna have to be doing with all the five focus areas given the reduction in some of our staffing abilities and having to downsize the organization and get ready for a potentially another downsizing than the following fiscal year.
I think there would be if we wanted to do that, then we'd have to take some other areas of the growing our economy and back off on them and and have that conversations to add this in.
So I think there's there would just be there would be a uh a switch on what what we were focusing on there because I'm not sure right now, given, you know, and I'm I'm I'm I'm down some staff too that we could add a bunch of new work in here and and uh given the capacity and our budget situation.
Lee, did you want to add in anything on this given your role in and helping to manage the focus areas with me?
Sure.
I mean, I would just say a present, you know, a majority of the council focus areas have four problem statements, and that's sort of the way we set it up.
Um, the growing our economy one, I would say it is more difficult to keep it to four than any other because we're dealing with private market demands, and obviously, council member, to your point, there is a lot of indicators and levers on what the city can or cannot do to advance the economy.
So, you know, we really did, I think, jointly between staff and the council last year kind of re-engage to get back to what is traditionally you know, core economic development work.
So the problem statement is really the four problem statements are really focused around kind of that core work around infrastructure readiness for businesses, business retention and attraction, um, downtown neighborhood development, as well as planning and financing for a variety of EIFDs or other tax tools that move.
So the council can certainly uh ask us to do more.
But if if we were we would be in a position to come forward with actual trade-offs for you guys to discuss for new problem statements because again, to I think to Jennifer's point, it's not just capacity right now, it's capacity of what the organization looks like in July that could be concerning, whether we actually have the leadership to to move various things.
Yeah, and and and to just uh just to bring the point home, and again, I think these are all very good goals and everything.
Uh we we adopted a two-year work plan for economic development that was pretty aggressive, and you know, I'm we were all for it.
So we would just say, well, we're gonna put some of that on hold to fit this in.
We certainly can do that.
Um make no mistake.
Same with code enforcement, the the modernization of code enforcement.
Staff wanted a three-year work plan to be frank, and I said no.
I said we're gonna have a two-year work plan.
So I I forced it faster and more aggressively, and I've even put more resources on that because they're trying to fix the the tires on the bus as we're driving the bus.
And so we can certainly trade out some of that work to do other code enforcement work too.
I mean, there's certainly possibilities of that, and we're certainly open to that, but I just don't want to uh I want to make sure we're not adding on, and then we're not um being successful in moving the needle, which you all expect of us, and we don't want to let you down.
Thank you.
To wrap up my comments, I will just say that um earlier this year when we saw the uh annual city services report, and um what I called out then that I will share again today is the three three out of the top five priorities for our city our general cost of living, housing affordability, and addressing homelessness.
And so if we are engaging in the first conversation of our budget uh process, this is the exact right opportunity as a council to really think about what we can do to recalibrate and focus on what those top priorities of our community are.
I don't believe in the sunken cost fallacy that says just because we have done X, Y, and Z, we have to continue doing that.
This is pretty much half a new council, and again, that's that's what we're here to do as a council.
Uh, listen to the community, take in their top concerns, and look at our uh council budget and realign, refocus, recalibrate if that's what we need to do, because that is what our community is calling on us to do.
Make sure that we are putting their interests at the forefront and the heart and center of our budget.
Thank you.
Thanks, counselor.
Let me go to counselor cohn.
All right, thank you.
Um first I want to thank everyone who came out and spoke today.
And you know, what always gives me great pride and um hope is seeing hearing from so many young people.
We had a large number of youth here today talking about their involvements in the school, their political activism, their interests in the services that we provide, the hardships they're going through, and that I just want to just thank all of you for being here and being part of this discussion because um a lot of what we're talking about are things in my mind, the things that are important to me in this budget are things that really are about the future, your future, about the next generation.
So uh really appreciate that input.
Um want to thank all the groups of foot here who are working on on the um what's important to and talking about what's important to them in the budget, and thank the mayor for inviting me uh to be part of the group that that gave the original framework that started kicked off this conversation.
I will just say the message itself kind of starts from the point of the deficit that we're facing this year, but doesn't really provide any specifics of how we're gonna solve that deficit.
This process kicks off what will be the real work being done by Jim, Jennifer, and Lee to go back and say, well, here's how we're actually gonna balance this budget and what those cuts and trade-offs are gonna be.
Um I know that uh Vice Mayor Foley talked about this at the last time we had the priorities session.
I haven't recently told this, you know, we commiserated with her about our time on the school board during the last recession.
So in 2008, I ran for the school, I would just give tell this story a lot.
I ran for the school board in 2006 to increase funding and support for counseling and mental health services for students.
And in 2008 and nine, during the recession, we laid off our counselors.
It was one of the hardest things I ever went through because it was it was a goal to increase an important service that we know benefits our children, that we know makes their lives better, that we know gives them an opportunity to be successful.
And we had no choice but to downsize.
Now, you know, years have gone by and we've grown, we you know, I was there to grow it back and re-add services, but it was painful, and we might be up against some painful decisions again in this year's budget.
So I just come from that perspective of of the things that have been fighting for as a council member for six years now, and I know that some of them are at risk.
And until I see what's at risk, it's really hard for me to say what other things we should add to the budget.
That's kind of where I am right now.
Not that all the things being suggested aren't important, but there are going to be things that we're going to cut that are important.
And so I I just kind of want to remind people this is the beginning of the process, this isn't the end of the process.
And when we get to May and we actually have the specific proposals, we will then be able to say, okay, now we know what we can have what we can use as trade-offs for adding other things into the budget.
And typically we things that are in the budget in May get taken out, things that are being proposed by others get added in.
But it but I'm just worried about over specifying too early in the process.
And you know, a couple years ago, we those of us who were here, and I know almost half the council wasn't even here two years ago when we um went through a very complicated budget discussion.
I remember two very passionate groups of people, two brown act groups coming into that meeting in June, not knowing what the outcome was going to be.
We were in our groups going, how are we going to get what we want in this budget?
And we sort of live on the dais in June, created a compromise and added things and made some trade-offs and made some some did some horse trading right then.
And I suspect that that'll happen again this year, but I feel like it's early for that to happen.
I just want to throw that out there.
We have time, we have three more months to do that horse trading.
So just wanted to mention that.
I do want to um call out you know things I'm looking at as important things that are actually at risk in the budget this year.
We've talked about libraries in the past.
I continue to harp on that.
We've we've built up a library service that's really important.
I want to specifically thank our library staff because while we talk about um youth and certain youth and children's services, the library does a lot of that work, a library department, and in fact, I'm really excited without adding to our budget.
Right now, the library department is um building out the first early literacy center in our city over on Eastside in uh the Toyon area, and it's really exciting.
We were doing that without without them asking for more money.
But if we start calling back in libraries, those kind of services could be at risk, and and I don't want to lose lose that momentum.
Obviously, we know the importance of our parks.
We all talk about our under maintenance at our parks.
Cuts to our parks will make that problem worse.
Well, we're all I know every single one of us hears from our residents about bathrooms that aren't in good repair and park fields that aren't usable, and we want to make sure that those don't lose attention.
Very few people on the council talk about climate and environment, but we are we are fighting in this city.
We are we are proud of our ranking as this as the greenest city in the United States, greenest large city in the United States, but that's only because of commitments that we've made to meet some goals by 2030.
And there are proposed cuts in the climate budget in the climate smart budget this year that could put that progress at risk and help and make it hardest for us to achieve our goals.
These are all things that are important to our families, to our community, and I'm concerned about.
And until I see what's coming back and what's being proposed to cut, it's hard for me to think about what the trade-offs are going to be because I know we're all going to be up here saying, hey, I don't want that cut, I don't want that cut.
I want to, I want I want to, and if I'm going to add something, I'm gonna have to think of another cut to make.
So I just that's sort of the context I'm coming from as we move forward.
I do want to thank the other um the other Brown Act group also for for re-elevating the um working families housing project that's being discussed.
I you know, I had some great meetings with working partnerships over the last year about what they're thinking, what they're doing, and I do think it's a great opportunity for us to be partnering with that and moving that forward.
Um, so I'm really I'm grateful that was re-elevated so it could be added, and I know that the mayor's reconciliation memo put put that into the budget process.
Um so that's my perspective.
I know that we're all kind of wondering what kind of motion we're gonna craft together of all these memos today.
The context I have is that the memo, the the motion today has to be clean enough for them for the um administration to be able to bring forward a budget, um, but that if this isn't the end of the process, and that a lot of the things that are in these other memos will still be discussed, and usually it's discussed through an MBA process where MBAs are written where we get the trade-offs.
If we add this extra piece in, for example, if we um include an item on um, you know, child care providers and therefore staff will have to stop doing something else.
We get a document that tells us what that trade-off will be, so we can make uh an informed decision when we're putting the budget together in June.
So I I don't expect this to be the end of any of these items on any of these memos, except that um it's a great it actually is really kind of nice to daylight them early so we can kind of see what everybody's priorities are.
So I'll that those are my comments on this process.
I want to thank everybody for their input because I think it's it's helpful in moving this process forward.
Thanks, Councilmember.
Appreciate you emphasizing the difficult trade-offs ahead and highlighting some of the things you're hoping that we protect.
Um, and I share those concerns.
Let me go to Councilmember Tordios.
Thank you, Mayor.
I want to start by just again thanking the members of the public who came out and who wrote letters and who spoke today, uh, as well as all of the members of our Brown Act, uh the mayor, the vice mayor, and council members Kameh and Cohen for all of the close collaboration getting to this point in the process.
Uh also uh very appreciative of the thoughtful recommendations from the other uh budget Brown Act as well as from Council Member Mulcahy's memo.
Uh, I think that this budget message, particularly after incorporating some of the recommendations from the other memos, uh, strikes a good balance of forward thinking policy with kind of zeroing in on the direct reforms that are responsive to residents' needs in our districts.
I wanted to call out that I'm particularly happy with a lot of the work that's gone into the building more housing section of the budget.
I think there's a lot of good work there from uh carrying forward the fee deferral work that I know Councilmember Ortiz led on in the rules committee uh previously, as well as the continued focus on expanding ministerial approvals, uh implementing that permit shot clock so that applicants have more uh reliable timelines when it comes to securing entitlements, as well as the continued uh commitment to studying the ways that we might be able to bring down the cost of building new housing, uh including with building code reform.
Uh, it was just last week I was talking to an affordable housing developer who was saying that there were San Jose specific building code elements that were adding over a million dollars to the construction costs of a uh affordable housing project in district three.
So I think good to continue that work stream to see how we can bring down those costs.
And as others have said, I also want to elevate the fact that uh the brown other Brown Act uh included the references to the working uh partnerships, working families housing program.
Uh, I'm glad to see that continued exploration.
This is one of the first briefings I took after I was sworn into office, and I think that the combination of you know setting up a revolving loan fund with looking at things like credit enhancement to bring down the cost of financing.
Good to see more innovative thinking as we look for ways that we're gonna build affordable housing more effectively in the future.
Uh, there were a couple other things that I wanted to call out in particular.
I'm glad to see the city taking its first concrete steps towards uh exploring an enhanced infrastructure financing district in the downtown core.
I've said before that San Jose is the only big city in California that doesn't already have one of these districts in their downtown.
Uh and I'm hopeful that as we navigate difficult budget years ahead where we just don't have much discretionary money available, uh, that something like an EIFD might be a unique way to generate some one-time funding to then turn around and invest in building housing and building infrastructure to support economic revitalization and affordability for our residents.
Uh also appreciative uh that the previous rules memo that we had around modernizing uh historic preservation uh has made its way into the budget.
Uh, we heard from a member from the Japan town community who highlighted kind of the lose-lose situation that a lot of property owners and residents are facing currently, uh, where you know you're surrounded by blighted and vacant properties, and there's this cost prohibitive amount of regulation to actually refurbishing uh or getting adaptive reuse into some of these uh properties.
So excited to see that moving forward.
And then finally, wanted to just uh uh note my appreciation for the provisions in the other Brown Act's memo around code enforcement.
Uh I know you know we are all frustrated with the ever-growing backlog of code enforcement uh cases and the difficulty in getting these prioritized.
Uh, one thing that I wanted to elevate as we look towards a uh future MBA in this area is just the ways that uh targeted code enforcement can be part of a larger economic development strategy.
Uh you know, I've talked to many business owners and would-be entrepreneurs downtown who said that they don't want to take over one of our vacant storefronts because they don't want to be surrounded by vacant storefronts.
I've talked to property owners who say that the lack of code enforcement in their neighborhoods is making it harder for them to do business.
It's driving down rent prices and uh making it again just difficult to survive in downtown.
And I've talked to developers who again don't want to invest in our downtown if they don't have guarantees about how the city is gonna actually uh address some of the quality of life concerns on the ground with things like blight.
Uh so as we move forward, hopefully this MBA can uh take a very intentional look at the way that code enforcement and blight remediation can be part of uh economic development strategy.
Uh so all that said, as others have noted, uh, it's gonna be a tough year, a lot of trade-offs to be had.
Uh, but you know, we're at the early stages of this process, so look forward to the continued collaboration.
Thanks, Councilmember.
Councilmember Duan.
Thank you, Mayor.
First of all, I want to start by thanking you know, our Brown Act and the Mayor and his Brown Act and our staff have worked way over time to to get all the answers that we needed and putting this whole budget message together.
I also want to acknowledge um the removal of the language that related to Ellis acts and the exploration of RVs in mobile home communities.
That was the definitely a right decision.
It reflect the strong concern raised by our mobile home community, and same as the mobile home um owners as well.
That said, I'm I'm a little bit disappointed in the emergency medical response program was not incorporated into the March budget message.
Public safety is a core service, and our fire department should never be treated as a secondary uh priority.
Having oversight on you know the narcotics that could prevent death and expensive lawsuits.
For example, my uh chief of staff, his daughter had a grandma's seizure with previous time the medication work at this last incident.
We're not sure it was saline or is it the diazepam that did not work?
It could have killed her.
And I think those are important things that lives is at risk when we don't have those oversight.
Our city staff is doing a fantastic job in addressing homelessness, have gone above and beyond what we are chartered to do.
Because our partner are not performing, you know, their fair share.
Just like when I'm going to a fire that I I have partners, and and our city is going to a fire right now doing dealing with our homelessness, and yet where is our partners?
That that those are the questions that I've asked.
Recommendation number 40 is my group memo is straightforward is direct the city to identify and quantify when city resources are being used to cover homeless services that fall under other jurisdiction, pursue cost recovery and improve coordination.
Um please.
I want to read directly from the city manager presentation to council office.
Quote the City of San Jose manage housing policy, comma, land use, comma, and program implementation, period.
Santa Clara County oversees health care, comma, key social services, comma, affordable housing units, and regional initiative to end homelessness, and is responsible for care for those with serious mental illness.
Especially in the year where we are facing 60 million dollars shortfall.
Because if we do not measure it, we cannot manage it.
And if we do not manage it, we continue asking San Jose taxpayer to subsidize the responsibilities that belong elsewhere.
This need to stop.
So I ask, how does the city manager office plan to transparently track our expenditure and ensure that city tax revenue is not being used to cover responsibility that belong to other jurisdiction?
Just help me understand you know why as a city we would not want to fully track financial expenditure tied to homelessness.
So I think I think I should correct um that statement.
The city absolutely measures what we are spending money on on a very regular basis that informs not only operations and the data we get on how we continue those operations, but ultimately recommend new changes to policy, new programmatic work.
So the city is constantly measuring our own funding and expenditures and how we track any given day.
The communication back to your office and where the city manager's office felt that it wasn't pertinent was the the original language of that was around our city charter and the county's city charter.
And we felt um, you know, our charter is it defines governance authority.
It's it's not a catalog of city services.
In fact, only about 35 percent of what the city does is actually covered in the city charter.
And I've not had the time to look at the counties, uh, but I would imagine it's similar.
It's a constitution for government.
And so I think it's a very um subjective exercise for staff to pick things that we're doing that we think should be a county responsibility, and then track what they're not spending.
Um we we spend an awful lot of time with our own budget and our own funds, um, you know, at a programmatic level and making sure we're achieving performance to do that for another organization and what we feel they should be spending on would be an incredibly staff intensive um and as I said before, uh highly kind of political exercise.
Quite frankly, and you know, I would just say I think the administration feels very strongly what we decide to work on is really the council's choice.
Um that is a value statement that you guys budget every single Tuesday.
I certainly get the you know, your analogy of running into a fire council member.
I would say a great deal of city staff probably feels that we're running into all sorts of fires, but especially the team that works on homelessness, and that we would like more partnership from the county, a lot more partnership from the state that's failed to address an issue, and the federal government wants to come along great as well.
I think it's far more important that the staff capacity to address what you're trying to get to is housed in the next conversation in the next phase with the county on the community plan and homelessness.
Say we're we're at the end of our current plan, and I would just say, having been involved in the last one, we decided to approve that right at the very end very quickly right before the pandemic started.
And so it's a very aspirational plan.
But as we've said to all of you, what never took place after that was a very detailed work plan of who does what, and we left that conversation with the county.
Okay, you guys focus on prevention, we'll focus on emergency and term solutions.
The next phase does need to be able to address at a much more detailed level who is focused on what, who has the expertise to achieve those initiatives and those outcomes that you guys direct.
And so that is that is where we would like to put staff capacity and not like a budget exercise of what we think they should be doing, because it would be very difficult and subjective.
Well, Lee, you you make a good point there.
You know, working with the county is different than paying for the service they should be providing.
Tracking expenses expenses or exactly what recommendation 40 is about and should be welcomed by our city's staff and council.
Making sure our residents are not paying for the service that should be shared and funded by other.
As we begin to engage the county around the next community plan and to end homelessness, I would like to have that direct discussion with the county.
We will also need to, with the county, push for state to provide more funding, as this is a statewide issues.
To my colleagues, our city is now performing homelessness-related services that extend beyond what our tax structure was designed to support.
While other jurisdictions remain responsible for key portion of that work, continue to spend in these areas without tracking or cost sharing contribute directly to the financial challenges that we are facing today.
This is why I continue to push for fiscal responsibility.
With that, I make a motion to approve the mayor supplemental memo and amend to include the recommendation 40 from the group memo.
And get a second, thank you.
Yeah, my my motion is to for the mayor's supplemental memo and to amend to including recommendation 40 from the group memo.
Unless there's any other uh friendly amendments that you like to make.
First of all, I think I heard a second.
Is that right?
I have Candela seconds.
Okay, Candel is seconded.
And the 40 is 40 A, B, and C, is that right?
There are three components, which is the uh memorandum of understanding.
The one that I just have on this is we do have a new partnership with the county that involves cost sharing, the county taking over a couple of VIHs.
We've kind of worked out an entire partnership with the county.
So I want to make sure ideally this would be integrated.
I'd also just note, depending on how this is interpreted, the amount of staff work on this could be substantial, which is part of why we did not integrate it.
So I think we need to have a better sense of scoping based on how it's how it's written here.
You know, other people's shares.
Do you need more clarity?
I'll also note as you think on that.
On 58 C, we felt was um perhaps redundant given that we do have an agreement with UP and we currently have a pretty good, we we've actually really improved our relationship with Union Pacific and have collaborated quite a bit on cleanups.
They've been bringing in ROC, cleaning trestles.
We have an existing agreement, so I want to better understand what we what 58C was getting at if we were to include that.
I'm sorry, 40 C.
Councilmember.
Well, I I think it's important it says prioritize negotiating an extension of the MOU with Union Pacific.
That was something that was uh more specific to my district.
So I'm happy to comment on that.
What was the question?
Um I guess given that we have an existing operate, we have an aggressive existing agreement with them.
I wasn't sure what the extension was.
It was a little vague.
We currently access land once every 30 days.
I wasn't sure specifically, this seemed very expansive.
So the uh MOU is expiring in 2030, and the goal of this language is to ensure that we are um you know preparing as early as possible for that.
I just suggest in a year where we're gonna have to cut staff and cut nearly 60 million dollars that we maybe just pause on that given that we're we've been doing more and more with UP and have four years to figure it out.
But I don't think it's it's kind of a minor point.
I don't I don't think it's a hill anybody needs to die on.
Um on the so on the first two from council member Duan's motion 40A and B.
If those were to be included, do we know how much staff work we're talking about here?
Or do you guys have clarifying questions?
I I definitely think we would need some clarity from the council member.
You know, on 40A, our existing dashboard and financial tracking systems.
I think we've got a very good handle of how we spend our money.
You know, Eric and his team, but also beautify SJ and um you know how this issue hits other departments where our work around the council focus area right now involves other jurisdictions where MOUs are important, whether it be Valley Water, or we've we've done huge agreements this year with Valley Water to open an EIH at Cherry, another huge one in with VTA for Serone.
Um those type of whether it's a lease agreement or MOU.
Um, I think we're constantly exploring.
I would say in some ways, trying to figure out who pays for what seems out of sequence given where we're at, since we're at the end of the community plan homelessness, and Eric and his team is as well as others in the city manager's office are working with the county, you know, in the short term, I would agree with the mayor, the the new framework where we're gonna have some real cost savings, but ultimately there's more than just us, the county, and including destination home in this conversation around the community plan, and it certainly seems like us starting there as an organization of what we need and what we want to achieve with those other partners, and then figuring out who starts to pay for what seems to be um that needs to happen before we go start doing this.
Yeah, I mean, I think the challenge with it, I'll just put a slightly finer point on, and then we can I do want to get in other voices and we can come back to further clarifying questions with the motion on the floor.
But um when it says identify the responsible jurisdiction where feasible for tracked expenditures, including whether financial responsibility rests with the city, county, state, federal government, or an external entity.
I think the challenge we face is part of the reason we have the problem we have with homelessness is it's not clearly defined, and there's not like a clear legal agreement on who does what.
It's been an ever evolving thing.
The federal government did a lot in the area of public housing many years ago and then pulled back different in different places, different jurisdictions play different roles.
We have leaned in to build a lot of shelter, which I will note is is at least currently within the cost of measure E, which was passed to address homelessness and housing concerns.
But um, there isn't like a clear legal definition of which of those four levels of government are are financially responsible for any one service.
It's kind of an ongoing negotiation, how well we use the bully pulpit, what happens in elections.
I mean, it's just there's not like something we can refer.
We could spend endless hours negotiating and not get any closer to defining those things with Congress, for example, or or HUD or whoever it might be.
So I think there's some limitations to what we can really define there.
I I I hear you, and and you make a great point, is it's not defined, and that is why we're trying to achieve, because when it isn't defined, we don't know who paying for what, how much it costs.
And I think we we have to start from here from within our city first.
Then we can partnership with our county, obviously.
And then we don't have to go state and federal.
I I just want to see from our city.
How do we analyze what is going in, what's going out, and then we can work with our partnership over in county to see that as well.
And it should be shared because we are sharing the same amount of unsheltered residents.
We're sharing the same burden, and we sharing the same financial responsibility as well.
Maybe I can offer a suggestion, uh, mayor and council member.
Uh one of the things that we're working on right now with the county is a possible um either joint board and city council meeting in August or September, or have the county come over here and present with Eric and I, and then the following week, Eric and I would go present to their board.
The intent of that is primarily focused on the community plan and homelessness, but maybe as a good starting point for that conversation and context for the board of supervisors, but also for the city council, we should do a bit of an intro of what the current what the city is currently spending on this body of work and what the county is also spending on that body of work.
So everyone has that context as we start the next conversation around the community plan.
Is that helpful?
Yes and a no.
You know, again, when it's not defined too much, uh the cost costing too much to take away from our ability to fund core services like police and fire department, right?
Staff I I believe the the amount of saving comparing to the staff time is negligible.
And and you know, we we spoke to many different um department directors who believe this would help us as a city as a whole.
The direction from here is to the CMO is that they can work with staff to achieve the goal.
The council direction is to address the cost, both sharing and recovery.
That that's what my point is.
Okay.
Um we may we may come back to this point.
We do have a motion, so I appreciate the motion from council member Duan.
Why don't we Councilmember Ortiz?
Did you put your hand down or did you want to speak?
I had my hand raised.
Um I just whatever, I don't know what's gonna happen next in regard.
I don't really necessarily fully understand what's currently on the table either, to be honest with you.
Um all I'm gonna say is that uh wanna rephrase uh my statement earlier.
I'm open to as long as there is an MBA or staff analysis conducted on our ability to utilize these settlement funds for uh uh immigrant defense and the children and youth master plan.
Um I will vote for whatever is the final um the final motion.
Thank you so much.
Okay.
Uh councilmember Condelis.
Uh thank you, Mayor.
I no, I appreciate everybody's feedback.
Um, you know, uh first of all, I want to quickly touch on the uh number 40.
Um, Lee, I appreciate the creative thinking around trying to figure out um how we get at the heart of what we're asking for, which is you know, expenditures, uh not just like holistic expenditure account, what it of what our partners are are expending and what we're expending uh to provide these these uh these services.
What of what our partners are are expending and what we're expending uh to provide these these uh these services um you know I I think um if if if we can somehow integrate 40 A and B as part of our joint city county effort or upcoming meeting um and then report back via information memorandum on on the on how that conversation goes uh in order for us to be able to respond to and actually have something to be able to bring to rules or or bring bring forth after that meeting happens is that something the administration would be open to if so I will offer that as a friendly amendment to to try to uh you know make make the intent of 40 work so are you asking what I offered around the joint meeting that correct in the form of an info memo correct that that is fine absolutely let me ask the maker of the motion if that is acceptable okay and you're the second second yeah and I I accept oh he seconded it oh sorry I thought it was you second it okay and and you know I guess the next the next the next part I would offer is um you know I I I mentioned it is is the uh direction to the administration to exploit explore the you exploit explore the use of opioid settlement funds to fund aspects of the children and youth services master plan master plan that meet eligibility requirements to increase the overall amount uh beyond five hundred thousand uh that is hopefully uh uh a friendly amendment that we could insert as part of the the mayor's recommendation I think that's you know one of the clarity items that I got from staff to make that work so I think you did get that clarity I do want to ask a follow-up though just as a point of information which is we had recommended opioid settlement funds for the uh paramedicine service and so are those now are we giving conflicting direction or do we need to identify priorization of those two it's a question for the administration I I think with that direction I I would think that we have um enough to explore the use of those items wonderful but what is your interpretation of the priorization of the two I I think we need a prioritization Jim sorry to correct you but I mean that I'm not trying to but I I do think we do because we are looking at those opioid funds as we speak for the community paramedicine program.
When it was presented to me when we were initially looking at budget proposals I did not feel that the the pilot was long enough to actually make an evaluation to determine if that can be it should be continued in the ongoing year so we're gonna we're gonna need to use a substantial portion of those community paramedicine programs.
So there might be some left to do that but I guess what I think to understand the relative priority between the two that would be helpful.
Well I just but I do think we need to understand the relative priority so depending on how we fit this puzzle piece together we we understand where the council sitting on those two items thank you jennifer and you know I appreciate that and you know for you know I I think the spirit of collaboration to try to get the best outcome for for our community whether it's you know the community paramo medicine program I think we can give that priority I I'd be open to giving that priority um as long as there is a you know there is also an a lot analysis uh and there's consideration given that this is a budget a state budget earmark uh request currently um uh through the the state and then um in addition to that we also have um the um the opportunity to to be able to fund some some aspect of the children use services plan depending on the children children use services master plan depending on how much money this community paramedicine model actually turns out to be I'm okay with with it with including that as part of the motion uh however I think there is uh I think there's gonna be an MBA forthcoming on the use of the budget stabilization fund uh and I I would ask that right correct or what's the the that fund the the budget stabilization fund um will be the recommendate the recommended allocation of the budget stabilization report fund will be incorporated in my proposed um budget that comes out on May 1 and that'll be up for discussion during the study session everything but it'll all be incorporated in there and you can say yeah you agree with it you don't agree with it you want to change something out but it all it'll just it won't be a separate MBA it'll be actually incorporated into the budget balancing strategy.
Yeah, I think that we can consider it again how the whole puzzle fits together.
I you know, we I would give our good faith effort to consider if there's more we could fund there beyond what was initially stated in the original mayor's march budget message with not with giving flexibility, maybe it's a little bit more, maybe it's a lot more, maybe it's nothing more than what we've got, and we would you would see, and then there would be those clear trade-offs where you where you would come back and amend my proposed budget uh and trade something else out.
But I would just appreciate the flexibility.
I appreciated the word that council member Ortizia telling, you know, if there was a direction for me to explore funding those up at higher levels, uh I think we would certainly do that as well.
Again, explore everything else that we've been directed to, and I like the flexibility because I've got to look at that feasibility and and because if if if if there was a trade-off on library hours, for example, I'm not sure that I would be making that recommendation to you and trying to preserve that core service.
So I just haven't put the whole, we haven't put the whole puzzle together in it, you know.
There is gonna be some negative outcomes with this budget, and I just um I I just would appreciate that flexibility.
Right, and and I think the intent of uh of the direction is to have that, even if it's a consideration for us to be able to know and and to be able to say this is important enough, you know, it's a it's a values decision.
It's a it's something that we as council members all care about, but we have to you know know that we're we have a fifty fifty-six million dollar deficit.
So we we understand that.
And so I I would hope that we have an opportunity to actually weigh and and uh and consider prioritizing if it's if it's children and youth services or the rapid response network, which you know me personally, you know how I feel about it.
Uh that's a conversation that we have.
And obviously, this is just the beginning of the process, but my hope is that that's that could be included.
And that's fair.
Thank you.
Uh council member, before you continue, I think you have at least two friendly amendments there.
I just want to get them on the record and confirm with the maker of the motion.
So one amendment was to analyze the use of opioid fund settlement funds for supplemental funding for the children youth master plan with the proposed the paramedicine program in the March budget message, uh taking precedence, but both being evaluated.
Correct.
And then the second there was to the info have asked the city manager to explore using the um which fund was the stabilization.
Stabilization fund for two potential sources as I heard it.
It was the FFN and the No, no.
It was the Children Use Service Master Plan and the Rapid Response.
And the Rapid Response.
Oh, it's rapid response.
Got it.
I got you, Mayor.
It's all good.
Or I got coffee, man.
I'm rapid response, R R N.
Sorry.
Okay.
Okay.
No, and let me just check with the maker of the motion.
Is that I accept.
Okay.
Um and I accept too.
Um okay.
So and then don't and then I also want to include the the first item that I started out with on 40 uh AB A and B that seeks that that clarification from the administration.
I think the administration has what they need to be able to run with it.
Um okay, so um I I expressed 12, 13, and 14 that as part of as part of our our uh our group memorandum.
I I would ask that that be in inserted as a friendly amendment, uh, given the exploratory nature and the the financial feasibility, flexibility that we provided the administration.
Except all right.
Did you just repeat which one that was?
Uh 12, 13, and 14.
Uh the exploration of additional modernization to code enforcement, uh, exploring policy options and a pilot enforcement outreach program as part of the analysis.
Um then the last uh thing that I I heard from my colleagues is um um pertaining to uh council member compos's priorities is the uh evaluation and the introduction of a new problem statement in the growing economy growing our economy focus area.
Uh uh a question for the administration is when what when will be the next opportunity for the council to weigh in on the focus areas and or problem statements?
Sure.
So um we highlighted this last week when we did the council focus area update.
Um unlike this past year, which was the first time we had done it this way this year, we're already working on what next year's dashboards, problem statements and kind of outcomes are.
So we'll be bringing those forward not after the budget, but as part of this year's budget.
So those will be released as part of a manager's manager's budget addendum, which our goal is to get those out you know, as part of the study session, so that you guys can ask questions and and really dive into some of that.
So that'll be in front of you and the council will vote on it in June.
So if if the council is unhappy with that work, they have the the ability to change it through the June message and June vote.
Great.
Okay, thank you.
Thank you, Leland.
And then the second is I would offer on 29 uh to provide direct.
I I think the way it's worded in our in our in our memorandum was a um uh like a direction to do alternatives, but would the administration be open to exploring alternative options to sustaining the FFN uh caregiver support network recognizing the FFN's uh not only parents and guardians to work uh but also themselves in small business.
Would staff be open to that exploration language for maximum flexibility.
Yeah, I think that we can explore options.
I think we already are Angel, uh, we already exploring options for other people to provide that services, which is consistent with what we said last year when we did it a year.
That's one of the reasons we made it a year two cut was knowing that we may not be able to support that of the general fund, it might be up in somebody else's wheelhouse to support that program.
So that is something that we are exploring as we speak um for that one.
Um so in general, and in general, um Jim and Lee with all with the addendums that are being discussed, you know, um the ones I guess I'm I'm I'm the exploring the funding on on your one and two is not that's that is not concerning to me because you've given us flexibility.
The the 12, 13, and 14 uh related to code enforcement would be new work that we would have to balance within the existing uh uh code enforcement work plan.
And so I am a little concerned about that without us getting through that all the modernization efforts that we're trying to do.
I mean, certainly we can again explore if there's things we can add if we're I'm trying to accelerate that work faster, but putting out a whole nother MBA because we've already got like 25, 20 to 30 MBAs right now, that's a lot of analysis and it's a huge lift.
So I am a little, I'm just gonna put on the record I'm a little bit concerned about that and would prefer for us to have more flexibility without doing an MBA and trying to figure out if there's ways we can uh get through some more of our modernization efforts, see where we end up at the end of this year, and then and then work on that.
Um and then the um I with the with with respect to the adding more problem statements to the focus areas uh I think that is again gonna be have to be a trade-off of of the entire economic uh development work plan and do we continue on with that because we we made a constant a concerted effort to narrow the scope of that work plan to make it actionable and to be able to deliver on with some pretty uh challenging goals in there, adding something else that I think we need to take something out of there, which again we can do, but that will take a little bit of time, and I don't know if we would be able to complete that analysis in time for the the May.
So I'm I'm looking to you to you and uh to say if we if we think we could make that trade-off uh choice so the council understands what that would look, and then they can make that and then they can select which option they would like to go to to be able to put that out in an MBA in May.
I just want I'm given all the work we're trying to do to actually balance the budget right now, and that's it's it's there's a lot of other work that needs to be had.
So we so we need to do an MBA on the council focus areas um and the recommended problem statements, outcomes and and dashboards and metrics.
Um so the council will council will have the ability to change one of those problem statements at that point if you would like to swap something out.
But I would we would definitely be saying you need to swap something out for that.
We wouldn't have the ability to absorb a fit.
So the council would have that will, Jennifer, I think, through that process.
Yeah.
Um so I guess I I would prefer for us if I know this um you may not uh prefer this recommendation from me, but I'd prefer us to continue along along so you can see what our work plan looks like on the on the growing our economy focus area since we're knee deep in it now, and what we're what our goals are going to be, and we're evaluating what we've accomplished this year.
And then if if we want to if if you find some of that to be not as important, then we get direction of that point to swap that out.
We may need to come back later and then have some you know deep thinking on what the goals are and the problem statement, and we that might trail into the new year, like we did this last year when we got to we got the the building more housing and growing our economy um uh focus areas which are new, and as you know, we it we worked very, very hard, uh, but we it took us a couple of few months to actually be thoughtful about where we wanted to go with that.
what we've accomplished this year and then if if we want to if if you find some of that to be not as important then we get direction of that point to swap that out we may need to come back later and then have some you know deep thinking on what the goals are and the problem statement and we that might trail into the new year like we did this last year when we got to we got the the building more housing and growing our economy um uh focus areas which are new and as you know we it we worked very very hard uh but we it took us a couple of few months to actually be thoughtful about where we wanted to go with that so I'm just worried about getting something meaningful to you in the short time frame so no I appreciate that so that's what that's what I'm and but you know I yeah I I I'm a little disheartened specifically not just on this obviously there's trade-offs that we have to make when we have these difficult conversations on what's important and and you know if we're saying that um when the we we do have an ad a budget addendum coming so we can discuss this and see what's going to be traded off I don't I don't understand why we wouldn't be able to have that have this as a consideration for when we for when we'd have the have this conversation and so I'm feeling and you know that that pause on on that point you know 1213 and 14 I work directly with the city manager's office to come up with language that would help us and now I'm hearing that it's an issue and so that is really really upsetting because you know we took the time to engage the administration to see what could work.
And and all and and and I just I'm a I'm a little disheartened to say to hear that as part of that you have you know there's concerns from the administration on on on whether these policy options or these alternatives to you know um uh uh strengthening code compliance is an issue now on the dais at the 11th hour yeah so on the first one I guess what I on the on the first one I just you know we can put something high level together I just don't want the expectation that it necessarily would be fully baked about all the sub goals you know how we have a lot of deep thought on on how each of our goals we have all the different problem statements and the deep goals I think we can I would want the flexibility to have more thinking time we can give you our initial thoughts on it but I would want to be able to have uh some more time with that um say you decided to go with that um to be able to refine it because again what's it's in short order I think that would be fair um as far as the code enforcement is concerned I I think what uh I don't I wasn't part of those conversations so I apologize with you know the feedback to the opposite to the to the to that Brown Act but I think you know I think what we're looking for is flexibility to fit that in with the modernization project but I wasn't part of those conversations and so Jim I was definitely and Lee can you clarify?
Yeah let me let me certainly start so I think when we were looking at that um narrative some of the feedback that we gave is this section is probably not going to be accomplished with the resources that we have given that we're going to reduce the the the budget perhaps there's a way to limit that or focus it or have a limited amount of direction and so I don't think that was taken.
The other alternative that was suggested is that there is a reengineering going on in the code enforcement and you know there could be some prioritization that the council could give to try to see fit some of that in but that's still would be a prioritization.
So it's not that we can't do any of these things is that they don't come without a cost or a trade-off just like most of the things that are in both the March budget message and the other brown act memo.
Okay and and I I figured as much and that's what we would try to do say we either you could give us direction to try to fit it in and we with understanding that this is a priority are you with for you like you've given us other direction to explore and you've given us the flexibility or if it's an absolute you know it has to happen now and everything since given our ability will not be able to add more resources you'd say swap what you think is the least other uh other items that you're working on the the least priority of that and fit this in uh no matter what so I think that's the the difference in the direction that I think we would like to understand.
Okay um all right so I mean I I I I mean the language states you know it's it's a um it's incorporating elements to the code enforcement reengineering efforts as feasible and in consideration of budgetary constraints and then we go on to say for example in 12 and explore add additional modernization to code enforcement focused on improving case resolution time sign uh case resolution timelines and strengthening accountability for chronically noncompliant proper I I mean I I can go verbatim and all these but but the intent of that is not to hinder the administration's ability to provide us as policymakers with uh with a robust analysis is to give us those policy considerations that we've heard and and that we want to see what that would look like.
If it's not feasible it's not feasible but I I think to not even have that conversation and and to because we're mindful that this is just the first step.
I get it.
I know that 14 actually asked for grants, so that would be additional resources.
Um so 13 is really a policy option, um, and 12 is sort of more of a sort of a program uh modification, but 14 actually is seeking additional funding.
That provides grants for partnerships, right?
So I don't think that would fit within the re-engineering probably.
Okay, so yeah, obviously that has a uh and again it's a budgetary constraint, is it not, Jim?
Yeah.
Correct.
And so that's that's the analysis that I think is important for us to have.
While it may not be well, while it may require a quarter million dollars, a million dollars, three million dollars, a hundred thousand, I don't know.
And and that that is that is something that I'm I'm tasking the administration to come back and say, you know, here's what we can, here's what this would look like if if the council chose to move forward on this re-engineering effort.
And and and what I'm hearing is No?
Is that what what I'm hearing is no?
I I think what you might be hearing is that that's or maybe we're maybe could we're tired and we're like saying the same thing, we're not saying the same thing.
I mean, I I think as someone who was looking at the memo, I I think it comes down to the level of effort you want staff to engage in to figure out how much the different initiatives cost.
So, of course, we can do the work to figure out how much would all of these items cost.
I think the lens that we are approaching it with is that we are going to reduce resources within the organization.
So when council wants us to cost out something or figure out how we can do something, um I think we just want council to prioritize that work and know that it may come um at the expense of of other things, or that even if you ask for an MBM, this to be more more specific, that that request is worth the effort that staff will put forth to give you those informations and that trade-offs.
Yeah, and that's fair.
Thank you, Jim.
Counselor, I'm trying to let you finish this point, but we are at about 22 minutes on your turn.
So I want to have a minute.
This is new to me.
I've never been past a lot.
In four years.
You've got uh okay.
So um all right, so if if staff is if staff can work within within the the frame, the frame that we've provided, and it's not overly prescriptive, or unless I'm hearing otherwise.
I think I think if you're not directing an M an MBA, I think what we would probably come back with is during the conversation of the budget study sessions, we could talk about what the current work work plan is as part of the code enforcement work and um you know have some you know initial discussion about what those items are.
Um and uh because the resources that we had for that re-engineering weren't substantial to begin with.
So a lot of that was leveraging existing staff resources to do that work.
Got it.
Okay, thank you.
Um, and then uh I'll let Councilmember Combo speak to the two items as as presented by um by uh given the information presented by the uh city manager.
Thanks, Councilmember.
Okay.
Continuing, we still have a few hands.
I'm sure there will be more.
Let's go now, let's go back around to Vice Mayor.
Shoot, I knew we were gonna make a lot of cuts this year, but I didn't think it would take us this long to get through the March budget message, which is more of a guiding document to set the tone for the numbers that are going to come back to us later.
Uh frankly, I appreciate your passion, council member, and the passion of all of the council members up here regarding the budget.
But frankly, this is uh document that is in my mind whirling out of control, where the budget is the mayor's message is direct city manager to do this, direct city manager to investigate that, and then Jim and the team and the city manager come back with numbers.
Here we're assigning all of this work that takes time away from them doing the budget work, and we still don't know the dollars that are attached to them.
We still don't know the other things that are that are going to be cut because of these other considerations.
That's gonna come to us in May.
In May, we're going to see the document, the budget document that says this is how much money we have, this is where we're spending it, and that's where we all say, oh my God, you're a you're taking the money away from one of my pet projects, the libraries.
How can I, what's the trade-off in the budget?
Where is there money in that budget that I can fund the library still?
We're asking the city manager to do that work right now.
We're asking her and her team to go off and do all this investigation, all of these feasibility studies, all of these things that may be very valid and uh important for us to do at some point.
But we need a budget first.
We need to know what we're going to cut to cut.
We have contract negotiations with our uh many of our bargaining units right now.
They need to know what's going to be cut.
We are not at that point yet.
May we're going to be closer to it, and June for sure will be at it, but we are not at that point.
So I feel like, you know, I've been through a lot of these.
I've said this before, but usually the sausage making occurs in June.
Doesn't occur in March.
We're trying to make sausage, and we don't know the price of the meat that we're using to make sausage, and that's a problem.
A weird analogy, but it's the only thing I could come up with.
Therefore, I move a substitute motion, and that is to approve the mayor's uh but uh March message, which includes his addendum and uh all the other motion his it includes his appendix.
And I so move.
I was second.
Okay.
Thank you, Vice Mayor.
Second, Councilman Kove.
We have substitute on the floor, which is the reconciliation memo, which includes the March message and the memo from Councilmember Foley.
Of course, the reconciliation memo includes a number of recommendations from the other memos.
Let's continue and uh see where we are.
Council Recampos.
Thank you.
I know it's uh late evening, and I appreciate the conversation for my colleagues so far and want to um make sure that we are starting the budget conversation on the foundation that is really rooted in what our community is asking for us.
And so I I want to continue the comments that Councilmember Candelas laid out and hope that the uh substitute motion will include the recommendations 20 uh 8 from the joint uh memo of the BA that I'm a part of.
Um in the mayor's blue memo blue memo, um we see that this budget message has to stay grounded in what the city can responsibly take on in a difficult fiscal year.
Updates to the zoning ordinance and to council priorities uh to council policies are routine, but they can also be very impactful, and that's why the mayor's budget message and our five signature memos speak to the importance of adequately funding and staffing PBCE to make sure that the city can adjust our local land use regulations to facilitate housing production and economic growth.
But economic growth is more than just data centers, it includes all businesses and it includes the ability of San Jose residents to work in the local and regional economy.
We already have examples of highly effective and highly cost-effective programs that serve small child care businesses who in turn support families throughout the city.
Introducing a problem statement in the growing our economy focus area does not require substantial ongoing funding, staff capacity, and potentially capital investment.
All it means is reviewing local regulations that make it hard for these businesses to serve and thrive in our community.
And I also want to discuss trade-offs.
Let's be reminded that in the existing increasing community safety focus area, there is an action item associated with proposition 36.
So I will ask staff a question.
Is the city of San Jose responsible for the funding, implementation, or administration of proposition 36?
The funding of proposition 36.
No, that is a shared county and uh justice system endeavor.
There's shared responsibility and the way things are implemented with our police force, but we do not fund proposition 36 per se, no.
Thank you, Lee.
I appreciate you clarifying that.
So let us not pretend that the existing focus areas are entirely the responsibility of the city.
Because 10 years ago, when the city operated zero shelters, if you were to propose building a shelter network of over 2,000 beds without sufficient and stable source of funding, you would have been left out of the room.
You would have been told that's the responsibility of the county.
But today we have constructed a shelter network with over 2,000 beds and doing so without a sufficient and stable source of funding.
And as a consequence, we are cutting core general fund services to pay for this shelter network.
And so I ask you all to imagine a world in which we had invested those hundreds of millions of dollars in families and children or in small businesses.
We as council are architects of the future of this community.
And so I appreciate the colleagues from the comments from my colleagues, but this is the moment in time where we set the foundation for our values as a city and how we as a city want to create a budget that addresses those needs.
As much as is written in these memos.
And I think that we're gonna soon see in terms of the realization that not only can we not do what's in the memos, we're gonna have to do some deep cuts.
Yes.
And I think that as we start learning a little bit more about what exactly needs to be done to close that deficit, it's not going to be uh easy.
So as we start thinking about all of these additional things that we would like to have, um I would suggest thinking about what is it that you're gonna take off the table.
Because if you haven't gone through a budget where you've had to do really deep cuts, I think my colleagues have talked a little bit about what had to be done during um the uh the deficits at in schools, and it was not easy at all.
And so I think that we're facing one of those challenging years that even maintaining what we currently have is not going to be that easy.
Um we would like to have all the revenue to do all of the things that we'd like to do.
Yes, child care is important, yes.
Uh you know, all of these things are important.
Uh, but I also think that we've got to think about how do we either spread it out or time it so that we understand that if we don't do it at this moment, um at some point we can do it.
Um the city has had over a billion dollars of deferred maintenance.
So when we talk about one-time monies, um, some of that one-time money is gonna have to go to things that have been waiting around for 10 years, 15 years, 20 years, uh, you know, of deferred maintenance that that we need to close the gap on because you do get to a point where it's gonna break and it's gonna be even worse.
So um I just I just want to caution my my colleagues that um this is the beginning, but I would say be prepared for even deeper cuts because um if we choose to go in a one direction, uh then we're gonna have to take something else off the table.
Thanks, council member.
Let me go to councilmember Mulcahy.
Okay, thank you, Mr.
Mayor.
Um I just want to recognize everybody for um you know, sort of being out of the Brown Act and sort of getting to sort of read the words on the page, but then hear what you have to say about um what you're sort of standing up for.
I really appreciate the conversation tonight, and many of you are not here anymore, but for those of you that are representing all the voices we heard, thank you for taking the time.
So, Mayor, thank you for the original budget message, and I appreciated the opportunity to sort of talk to your staff and and uh and the rest of the administration.
But I want to recognize the effort in the reconciliation memo.
Um, and I wanted to take a few minutes to sort of walk through because I don't get to talk to you or others to kind of talk where some of the things that were in my memo that I think were um you know they're sort of new topics.
Nobody's talked about it here today.
The the central thing I want to emphasize today is the need for San Jose to continue to shift from a reactive city to a proactive one.
Too often our council offices and our departments are responding to issues after they've escalated, only after a resident files a complaint for a trip and fall.
Um the opportunity is there to get ahead of issues and resolve them before they grow into larger challenges or legal settlements.
That is where the one-team approach becomes so important.
Across our city, we already have staff in the field every day in parks, public works, code enforcement, the airport.
By empowering them with the tools and expectations to report what they see, and by strengthening systems like SJ 311, we can create a real-time feedback loop that allows us to act earlier and more strategically.
This mindset shows up across our recommendations in our memo, from improving park maintenance and expanding successful pilots like the municipal rose garden to strengthening coordination along Creek corridors and to ensuring our business districts are safe, vibrant, and well managed.
It also applies to how we think about the larger citywide assets.
And I appreciate the mayor's inclusion of an attention to SJC, where we have an opportunity to be far more proactive in how we attract new airline service, coordinate with regional partners, and think strategically about the use of its surrounding land.
At the same time, as we look ahead to more events in 2026 and the 250th anniversary of San Jose in 27, we need to continue leveraging the airport as a gateway to showcase our city and drive economic activity.
As we've seen so far with SJ 26, these are exactly the kinds of opportunities where a proactive coordinated approach can have an outsized impact.
So just to talk about some of the specifics and item two in your addenda sort of refers to SJ 311 common tools.
I want to briefly touch on the response in in that memo.
And first I appreciate the acknowledgement that these are worthwhile ideas and that some work is already underway through the city manager's performance and customer service work plan.
I want to note that much of our section was to push forward on commitments made in last year's 2025 MMBM.
I want to emphasize that our intent here is not to be overly prescriptive or interfere with operational decisions, but rather to reinforce the importance of continuing to move in this direction.
From our perspective, this is about outcomes, improving transparency, usability, and responsiveness to tools for residents, while also fostering a one-team culture where city staff are empowered and encouraged to identify and report issues themselves.
So just I think Lee Wilcox, Assistant City Manager, I think you're you have SJ 311 under your purview.
Is that accurate?
Yes, the transition of that is a well, I would say that is a big part of the customer experience work plan and the driving organizational performance right now, yes.
So as I mentioned, a lot of our memo is referring back to the 2025 work plan.
So when will we get a clearer sense of the timeline and milestones for the current SJ 311 improvements, particularly when we might revisit expanding categories?
So you'll get a part of that.
We're going to come forward in early May, the administration will with an update on the customer experience work plan, kind of what's been done, kind of the strategies around kind of the culture shift, some of the technology where the 311 is housed, but also some of the training for the workforce and some best practices work we've done across other cities and how that's modeled and staffed.
Part of that um update will include 311.
Um but I do want to say one of the things that I think we're slowing down implementation of some of those new buttons or services so that we make sure the service delivery, you know, behind it is actually ready to absorb that work, and that's really kind of based off some of the lessons learned around vehicle concerns we had this last year in the addition to that item.
So I appreciate that, but in some of the things that we mentioned in our memo, not that they will be included in the work plan, but I know in conversation they have been contemplated in the prior work plan.
So you know, not a work plan to how when you're gonna include them, but at least there's that they're still on the table.
Oh, they're absolutely still on the table, yes.
Okay.
So my memo also suggests that we consolidate existing reporting tools into SJ311.
We just sort of talked about that, like park concerns, which you can call or email right now.
But if you go to 311, there's nowhere on there that tells you that we have a an out, you know, outside of SJ 311.
Here's the number to call, here's the email to send to for park concerns.
So you know, the same thing for code enforcement as a separate place to go for that.
Um so assuming uh you know my uh memo gets trimmed by what we approve today.
Can you speak to whether it's possible to at least simply add hyperlinks for 311 users or the relevant information on the welcome page or on the splash page so that people understand that there are resources available to them, such as park concerns, such as code enforcement, because it doesn't give that direction on today.
Sure.
Um in short, yes.
I think what you will see in May is us on the customer experience back plan, kind of even backing up and using that as a portal, not just to be able to report something through the app, but a way for us to communicate more strategically with residents.
Um, you know, can and we're going through the mapping exercise now of figuring out what those doors are because someone should be able to just go to one website or one app and we should have all of that synced together.
So while they might not be able to report on park concerns right away through the app, we will have information of where to go or to call you know the call center where they can report such things.
So that is a big body of work that we are trying to achieve, yes.
So to the point of trying to empower city employees to be proactive, you know, with a with using 311, for example.
When I started here in January of last year, I couldn't use my city email to sign up for 311.
That now has been changed.
Khalid and I met this week and we've affirmed that that's the case.
Has management considered any internal adoption of SJ311 to encourage all staff that they use it, and if not, do you see opportunities to pilot or phase in broader employee use moving forward?
There has been conversation.
I think a lot of the work right now is primarily focused on getting the app right with the integration of the CRM so that the that is a priority for our group so that city employees that are engaging with residents, your office or any other employee can kind of see that customer or you know that residence experience all in one place.
So that is more of a priority.
On some of these other issues, we have quicker reporting tools for staff as well.
Um we've even talked, you know, in Khaled's given examples of like pavement maintenance.
Like where we don't ask employees to use SJ311.
There's other reporting methods for some of that.
So it's it's a conversation, but we're trying to figure out what the most efficient way is on the staff side, if it is if it is that for some things, but there's also other methods that could be a bit quicker.
I mean, I just think you know, to talk about one team, if there's anything that's one team, it's getting everybody in the you know, kind of swing of see something, say something, report it so that we can fix it before it's a problem.
So yeah, I just want to add in, yes.
So that is where we want to get to.
And there has been a communication gap on where we are with our customer experience transformation.
That's why I've asked Lee that's bring something to council so you can have a much better understanding of where the work plans going and what's in the parking lot that we're going to uh eventually address.
But that is the idea because I want the internal customer service of our employees, and that's why you know very shortly here.
We're gonna have our day of service to own our service delivery system in a deeper way, but we're we're building towards that, and so your points are very well taken, and we do uh want to be more of a proactive uh service delivery system rather than reactive.
And that's why we're doing our code enforcement transformation, and I've got many different things as we've discussed earlier on our service delivery optimization sheet, and we've got some some that are year two, and we're putting things in the parking lot, and those are also being integrated into uh and uh into the whole customer experience transformation.
So they're trying to optimize the service, and how do we get it back into the the customer experience?
So super exciting work and uh agree with uh where you want to go, and I should I believe the council all wants to go based on all my conversations over the last few years and when I became city manager.
So more to come, but you'll you'll see that, and if there's other things that we should be putting into that parking lot as we're building out the system, we're gonna be more than open to put that on the list, and we will figure out how to build that in through the transformation effort.
Mayor, I'm gonna respectfully ignore the red light since I've only got the mic one time and we've had colleagues talk for 25 minutes on one.
So I want to uh appreciate the administration's feedback on our request regarding expanding the municipal rose garden pilot program.
I do want to highlight that this pilot was originally funded through a budget document last year and has shown strong measurable success.
Our intent in including it here is to signal that this is the type of program that should be considered for ongoing funding rather than continuing as a one-time or piecemeal effort.
More broadly, it can serve as a model for how targeted visible staffing models can improve conditions in our parks while reducing strain on other city resources.
I wanted to see if uh John Cicerelli is still here.
Thank you, John.
I'll ask the question while you're walking down if that's okay.
Um can you speak to the effectiveness of the municipal rose garden pilot, particularly in terms of improvements in park conditions and overall user experience?
Sure.
Thanks for the question.
John Cesoli, director of parks recreation able to services.
Just for clarification, the pilot is um using two um part-time unbenefit employees, a uh park ranger assistant and uh rec leader.
Um it's about a 41,000 dollar pilot, so it it's for the the two big times of the year at the Rose Garden, which is really now until June.
Um, and then also last year we did it the first three months, which was basically from uh August to October.
So those so we've had those three months of data.
And in those three months, what we were able to see is by the end of that on weekends, we were no longer really experiencing unpermitted vendors.
And that is because through those through those two people, we were A, able to get some people to sign up and get the right permit.
Um it's a particular issue with professional photographers.
We get things like uh weddings, um, all kinds of events and vendors um that aren't following the rules.
Um, and so the other thing we're noticing is that the park isn't as difficult to clean up uh because typically the permitted vendors, you know, they're signing agreement saying you're supposed to clean up after yourself, we can hold them accountable for that.
Um so they clean up after themselves.
Um so I think that user experience is much improved, also because all of these unpermitted things, there are many of the users that don't like that either, right?
And complain about it, um, which is part of why we got there.
So I think both those things are happening.
We're we've seen the unpermitted vendors go way down, and we've seen the cleanliness of the park go up.
Great.
Thank you, John.
Appreciate it.
Um and lastly, Mayor, um, I need a clarification on this one.
This was noted in the mayor's justification columns as exist in the mayor's March budget message.
This is on um item five park restroom maintenance.
Um we scraped through the MMBM and didn't find any specific reference to park restroom maintenance.
If the recommendation is being integrated uh and on the chart, and it isn't actually in the MMBM.
Will you accept that the language in my memo will supersede?
And I can read what it says in our memo.
Yeah, your direction is evaluate opportunities to improve park restroom conditions through uh what do you have more consistent maintenance standards, robust oversight, and management of third-party vendors and targeted improvements for our well-loved spaces.
It's been a while since we wrote the March, the actual message.
Hold on.
Yeah, I've spent a lot of time in all of them.
I mean, we did a word search, you know, with maintenance, etc.
And I didn't find anything in it.
And what I was looking at is I know, yeah, sorry to interrupt you.
That sounds good.
I mean, I appreciate the spirit of where we're going with it.
I don't have a particular problem with it.
We're just trying to minimize any additional staff overhead given that we're already oversubscribed and sadly going to be likely reducing our capacity here.
But Jim, do you want to share on Wolkehi memo rec number five?
Park restroom maintenance.
I think when we discussed it, we felt it was aligned with existing direction, but it might not have been in the March message, it might have been prior council direction.
It might have been prior council direction.
Right.
I think yeah, thank you.
I think that was you know in line with um sort of the current um work plan and our approach to the restrooms and what the city manager's priorities are also.
So I think those are all in line with um trying to make those improvements where it's feasible.
And we often have uh capital investments target to restrooms also, so it felt like really in line with the work that we're already doing.
And then we did have a small section and other ongoing work that referenced evaluating the um efficacy of third-party contracts, basically auditing third-party contracts, which you reference third-party vendors.
To be fair, I I think if the intention of this recommendation is to yield any big change other than what staff is already doing, I think we need to identify a pay for or a trade-off, basically, given that we're just in this context of knowing that what's looming is actually cutting nearly 60 million.
No disagree, no disagreement here.
The reality is we've already discovered two situations where third-party crown contracts were not being managed, and the bathrooms, for example, were a disaster.
And when they started managing the contractor, things got better.
So let me ask this.
In in the call out in the original March budget message to evaluate third-party contracts, and when we send dollars out the door to a contractor, whether nonprofit, for profit, there is we we had some discussion about how do we know if the work's getting done.
There's one thing about reporting coming back to us, but as you know, I'm very worried about what actually is happening out in the field, which I think is what Councilman Mulcahy's referencing, specific to the restrooms uh in the parks.
Jim, does that direction that we included or or Lee or Jennifer in the message, the original message, will that be inclusive of looking at these contracts?
Yes, thank you for that reminder.
Yeah, the evaluation of third-party vendors.
I think that is where that alignment came from.
Okay.
And that will include looking at our vendors who are third-party vendors doing maintenance of bathrooms in the parks.
Yeah, as part of other work, yes.
Yes.
I think that was the rationale for someone.
In the spirit of that, I'll I'll be I'll be good.
But I just want to point out that it wasn't until we had the part timers on the weekend with these with the ranger and the rec leader that it was known that the bathrooms weren't getting cleaned, right?
So it's sort of a it's sort of a package deal where we recognize that.
So yeah, and we're we will definitely include that.
I mean, we're trying to at this point not to shut down the restrooms.
Uh there's been proposals to actually close restrooms, which I will not support, and I don't think anybody will support that.
But these are the terrible trade-offs that we're trying to do to about to balance this this level of a shortfall.
So as long as we're, you know, trying to get more efficient, trying to optimize our existing service delivery and not cut um in that area.
That is our goal here.
So I think that uh uh and try to improve again uh be more efficient and effective with our resources.
That is absolutely a goal in this area and many other areas all throughout the city.
And I'll just finish by saying that you know the the spirit of the memo was not about doing more for the sake of doing more.
It's about doing better with what we already have and build on the tools and talents we have available at City Hall.
Thank you.
Yeah, it's great.
That's great.
And I share the um not that you use the word frustration, but the desire to see the 311 app be more robust, more specific.
I think we've, as we brought it in house, learned it's gonna take some time and there's some sequencing to be done to be able to add the level of functionality that I'd certainly love to see there, and I think I think our community would as well.
Um okay, thank you, council member.
Let's turn now, hopefully, for a final comment from council member Cohen.
All right.
Just one thing.
I just wanted I thank thanks for all the conversation discussion.
Just one thing I think was lost in the substitute motion that I think is important to have in there, and that is the uh idea of exploring the use of opioid settlement funds for the children youth services master plan, making sure also for though that the field paramedicine program takes precedence for those funds.
So I will ask for that as a friendly amendment to add to the motion on the floor.
Yes, that's a friendly amendment.
And the second okay, okay.
And then I'll just wrap up by saying I'm still still um hurt um smarting from last year when we cut the two drop-in evening and weekend um programs for youth in our two community centers in my district.
So we're gonna be doing similar things this year.
So I just want to we we made cuts already last year that are bad for our youth and for our community, and we're about to do more.
And I'm you know, we're none of this is gonna be easy, and I just was reminded of that as we were talking about parks, but wanted to bring that up.
And I just was reminded of that as we were talking about parks, but wanted to bring that up.
Thank you.
Good re good reminder, and um it's gonna be a a difficult uh but critical process in the months ahead.
And I know we're gonna work together to make the cuts that we have to make, uh, have a little impact on our residents, particularly children, seniors, those who most rely on us for essential services, and our our workforce who deliver the services.
So thank you all.
I think this is a great start.
Appreciate the substitute motion from Vice Mayor, seconded by Council Kameh.
Tony, let's vote.
It sort of times out when it's been a long time.
Motion passes eight to three with Duane Candeles and Campos voting no.
Okay.
Tony, do we have any cards?
I think the gentleman who was here has left.
Yeah.
I'm I'm gonna say his name in case he's hitting Jose.
But I I think Jose is gone.
Yeah.
Okay.
Thank you all very much.
We're adjourned.
Have a great evening.
San Jose City Council Meeting: Budget Message, SB 79, and Child Care Report (March 17, 2026)
The San Jose City Council met on March 17, 2026, in a lengthy afternoon and evening session to address several major items, including a status report on child care policy, implementation of Senate Bill 79 (industrial ordinance and historic resources), and the approval of the Mayor's March Budget Message for fiscal year 2026-2027. The meeting began with ceremonial items and a unanimous consent calendar. A significant portion was dedicated to public comment on the budget, with 186 speakers registered. The council voted 8-3 to approve the Mayor's budget message as amended, and also approved the SB 79 industrial ordinance and a substitute motion on historic resources.
Consent Calendar
- All consent calendar items were approved unanimously without discussion or pull.
Public Comments & Testimony
- On Child Care (Item 3.4): No public comment was taken; speakers were redirected to the budget item (3.3).
- On Land Use (Items 10.2 and 10.3): Speakers included Brent Triana (neighborhood association), Tronic Crichton (VTA senior planner), Ben Leach (Preservation Action Council), Jimmy Kogura (Japantown representative), Brent Van Brocklin (VTA TOD project manager), Mary Ang (Opportunities for Change), and Mike Sodergren (Preservation Action Council). They expressed support for protecting historic resources and asked the council to consider mixed-use development on VTA sites while maintaining employment hubs.
- On the Budget Message (Item 3.3): Over 150 speakers addressed the council, many representing community organizations, neighborhood associations, and advocacy groups. Key themes included support for public safety, homelessness reduction, housing production, youth investment, child care, senior services, immigrant defense funding, and prevention programs. Multiple speakers supported the mayor's budget priorities, while others called for increased funding for the Children and Youth Services Master Plan, the Family Friends and Neighbors (FFN) program, and the rapid response network. The public comment period lasted from approximately 10:15 AM to late afternoon, with each speaker limited to 45 seconds.
Discussion Items
- Child Care Policy Opportunities Status Report (Item 3.4): Staff presented an overview of city efforts, including a brief survey of other jurisdictions (San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Oakland, Seattle, etc.) and current San Jose programs (Recreation Preschool, FFN network, boost program, co-location in affordable housing). Councilmember Campos moved to accept the report, noting the importance of child care for workforce participation. Councilmember Casey expressed concern about "mission creep" and regional funding, while Councilmembers Kamei, Tordillos, Ortiz, and Duane supported the report and emphasized child care's role in economic development and family stability. The motion passed unanimously.
- SB 79 Implementation (Items 10.2 and 10.3): Staff presented jointly on the amendment to Title 20 (Industrial Employment Hub Exclusion) and analysis of SB 79/AB 130 impacts on historic resources. For Item 10.2, the council voted to designate five industrial employment hubs (North San Jose, Berryessa, Lundy-Milpitas, East Gish-Mayberry, Monterey Business Corridor, Old Edenvale) to exempt qualifying industrial lands from SB 79's residential streamlining. The ordinance will take effect April 23, 2026, before SB 79's July 1 implementation. For Item 10.3, staff discussed risks to historic resources under the combined laws. Councilmember Mulcahy proposed a delayed effectuation ordinance for historic districts and conservation areas. Councilmember Tordillos offered a substitute motion (with Cohen, Campos, Kameh) to adopt staff recommendations (narrower definition of demolition) and direct a workload analysis for a future historic resources survey. The substitute motion passed 10-1, with Mulcahy voting no.
- FY 2026-2027 Mayor's March Budget Message (Item 3.3): Mayor Mahan presented the budget message, outlining a $56 million shortfall for the coming year and a projected additional $28 million deficit. Priorities include public safety, homelessness reduction (2,000 shelter placements, 1,000 new since early 2025, unsheltered homelessness down over 20%), housing production, economic revitalization, and fiscal discipline. He acknowledged 63 unique pieces of direction from council memos and issued a reconciliation memo incorporating several items. Councilmembers Condelas, Ortiz, Campos, Cohen, Kamei, Tordillos, Duane, and Mulcahy debated amendments. Vice Mayor Foley made a substitute motion to approve the mayor's budget message and reconciliation memo, which was seconded by Councilmember Kamei. Friendly amendments from Councilmember Condelas (including analysis of opioid settlement funds for the Children and Youth Master Plan and exploring code enforcement modernization) and Councilmember Cohen (exploring opioid settlement funds for the Children and Youth Master Plan with paramedicine precedence) were accepted. The motion passed 8-3, with Councilmembers Duan, Condelas, and Campos voting no.
Key Outcomes
- Consent Calendar: Unanimously approved.
- Child Care Report: Accepted unanimously; staff directed to continue work.
- SB 79 Industrial Ordinance (10.2): Passed unanimously; will be submitted to HCD and take effect April 23, 2026.
- Historic Resources and SB 79 (10.3): Substitute motion passed 10-1, adopting staff recommendations (narrower demolition definition for historic resources) and directing a workload analysis for a future historic resources survey. A delayed effectuation ordinance was not approved.
- Budget Message (3.3): Approved 8-3, including the mayor's original message and reconciliation memo. The city manager will prepare the proposed budget for May study sessions, with a final vote in June.
Meeting Transcript
All right, good afternoon, everyone. I would like to call to order this meeting of the San Jose City Council for the afternoon of March 17th. Tony, would you please call the roll? Come? Campos. Present. Tordillos. Here. Owen. Ortiz. Present. Mulcakey. Here. Duan. Here. Kendallas. Here. Casey. Foley. Mayhem. Here. You have a quorum. Great. Thank you. Now, if you're able, please stand and join us in the Pledge of Allegiance. Pledge allegiance to the flag. Thank you. Today's invocation will be provided by David Mulvahill, Chief of Operations of the Nouveau Hospitality Group and downtown Stakeholder. And Councilmember Tordillos will tell us more. Thank you, Mayor. Good afternoon, everyone, and happy St. Patrick's Day. Today we're especially lucky to have someone with true Irish roots joining us to deliver our invocation. David Mulvahill moved to the Bay Area from Ireland in 2001 and now proudly calls downtown San Jose home. Originally from the countryside of Tillamore. Sorry if I'm butchering the pronunciation there. Ireland, David often says that while San Jose is a big city, the warmth and hospitality of our downtown businesses and residents give it that same small town feeling he grew up with. Many of you know David from O'Flaherty's Irish pub, where he began bartending over 15 years ago before becoming a partner in the business nine years ago. Since then he has played a major role in shaping our downtown food and nightlife scene as a founder and partner of Nouveau Hospitality. Through ventures like Five Points, Dr. Funk, Hello Good Burger, Playback Coffee in the Press Room. David has helped to make downtown San Jose a vibrant and welcoming place for both our residents and our visitors. Thank you. So that was my first introduction to the Bay Area. And um this is the story of quite a few Irish emigrants that we don't hear about. So you know, I started out on a construction site, not knowing what I was doing, bounced around from job to job. I was an undocumented worker for 10 years. So sometimes it takes a lot longer to get to the American dream than you think, but I feel like it builds your character. I might as well give you a job. So I started bartending and really found that um I loved uh people and working with people, uh, meeting new people, and I just felt a great sense of relief that um I'd actually found purpose in life.
openpublica.com