San Jose Study Session on Deferred Maintenance and Infrastructure Backlog, April 13, 2026
San Jose Study Session on Deferred Maintenance and Infrastructure Backlog, April 13, 2026
The San Jose City Council held a study session on April 13, 2026, to review the Deferred Maintenance and Infrastructure Backlog (DMIB) report. The session, chaired by the Vice Mayor, featured presentations from Public Works Director Matt and Budget Director Jim Shannon, highlighting a $2.6 billion one-time backlog and $259 million annual ongoing need to prevent further deterioration. Councilmembers discussed funding challenges, equitable prioritization, and potential strategies including new revenue sources, asset sales, and public-private partnerships.
Consent Calendar
No consent calendar items were discussed.
Public Comments & Testimony
No members of the public spoke during the session.
Presentation Overview
- Deferred Maintenance and Infrastructure Backlog (DMIB): The current report identifies $2.6 billion in one-time unfunded needs and $259 million annually to maintain assets at current conditions. Key categories: storm sewer ($900M, up from ~$100M due to completed master plan), parks ($650M), city facilities ($570.9M), transportation ($500M), and cultural facilities ($20M).
- Why Backlog Grows: Underfunding preventive maintenance is often a short-term trade-off to preserve services, but leads to higher costs when assets fail. Many funding sources are dedicated but difficult to increase (e.g., construction taxes, Transient Occupancy Tax) or rely on the limited general fund.
- Critical Projects: City Hall water intrusion ($45M), elevator modernization (31 of 70 elevators, ~$800k–$1M each), HVAC upgrades, backup generators, EV charging infrastructure, and storm outfall repairs (400 outfalls).
Council Discussion and Questions
- Councilmember Ortiz asked about equitable distribution of backlog across districts and whether new parks add to maintenance burden. Staff acknowledged no district-level breakdown currently but committed to improving reporting. Parks Director John Cisrelli confirmed new parks increase future capital rehabilitation needs; day-to-day maintenance is funded through operating budgets.
- Councilmember Mulcahy questioned the city’s real estate portfolio strategy, suggesting selling underutilized assets or using public-private partnerships to offload capital obligations. Staff noted ongoing property sales but no active review for this specific purpose. Councilmember requested adding asset evaluation to the strategy list.
- Councilmember Tordillos expressed concern that new downtown sports and entertainment investments could exacerbate the maintenance backlog and supported reviewing ownership of cultural facilities.
- Councilmember Duana asked about reducing project costs (noting 40% soft costs for Public Works projects) and why critical repairs like the Alma Senior Center HVAC were delayed. Staff explained that soft costs include necessary project delivery and that prioritization often forces deferrals due to limited funding. The HVAC replacement is funded through CNC and park trust funds, but if insufficient, emergency funding may require general fund.
- Councilmember Vacancies (others) also discussed polling results for potential revenue measures. Assistant City Manager Lee Wilcox reported that a parks parcel tax and infrastructure bond are 15–16 points below the two-thirds threshold, making 2026 unviable; focus will shift to 2028 with enhanced community engagement.
Key Outcomes
- No formal votes were taken; the session was informational.
- Staff will bring forward a proposed budget in May 2026 containing initial funding for the City Hall water intrusion project and other critical items, with a potential financing strategy to follow.
- The city will continue developing a citywide stormwater property-based assessment fee and evaluate a general obligation bond for 2028.
- Council directed staff to incorporate asset sales and public-private partnerships as explicit strategies for addressing the backlog.
- Staff committed to improving DMIB reporting, including district-level breakdowns and more consistent data across departments.
Meeting Transcript
Good morning, everyone. It's 9 30, so let's get started. I'm filling in today for the mayor. So you got me. I'd like to call to order the study session on deferred maintenance and infrastructure backlog. Tony, will you take the roll, please? Cohen? Here. Ortiz? Present. Mulcahi. Here. Juan? Here. Candelas. Casey. Foley. Here. Mayhand. You have a corn. Great. Thank you. So as this is a study session, we start off with a presentation, then we go to council questions, and then if time permits, we go to opening to any comments from the general public. So I see we have Matt and Jim in the box. Let's get started. Well, welcome all. So we have about 20 slides to get through with a decent amount of content. If you made it through the report, uh you're probably better than most. It is sort of a beast, and it's not even all of the work that gets done around our infrastructure and our maintenance. So I'm here as a public works director, but I am by no means the only department that runs or does maintenance or deals with infrastructure. We have many people here, and many of our departments are represented to talk. If there's very specific questions that Jim or I can't cover, we'll bring in some folks from the audience to support the different areas. And so we'll work through of um what is deferred maintenance and infrastructure and why and what we want to talk through there. The key is and infrastructure, because we as we continue to study what is going on around our ecosystem here in San Jose, um, we find things that are short of what we expect. And our community tells us what's we're short and what they expect. And so we keep um cataloging and understanding it some more. We'll walk through the current DMIB, and that's uh we'll keep saying that over and over again, but that's the deferred maintenance and infrastructure backlog report. Um we'll talk about some critical near-term things that we would like to that we will be addressing. Um, and you'll see in front of you a different forums to make decisions that we'll be asking you for things. And then uh Jim will very specifically talk about some strategies to help with this because the backlog really is about money, and so if we had the money that's listed in this report, um, we would have a plans around it and we'd be in our capital program and or our maintenance opportunities with our operating budgets to maintain them. So we would these shortfalls that we'll be talking about. Um we wouldn't be here talking about them, you'd be seeing them in the different other reports, and then we'll have time for discussion and questions and so forth. Here we go. Um so what is the DMIB? It's the list of all the repairs and upgrades and replacements of all the different assets, and we're endeavoring to keep them in good condition and serviceable conditions, both and we obviously focus on safety as a primary thing, but we also functionality and uh ease of use and what our community wants. Um why it's deferred, it's either noted because it was never brought into our CIP in terms of capital as we study things through master planning and so forth, or there's just lack of resources for us to do the maintenance in the timely way, or we made decisions about maintenance and how we do repairs and so forth. Um then the infrastructure gaps is when we'll do studies. In particular, we'll keep saying this about storm. If you look just at the chart on the early couple pages of the report, the storm um DMIB number jumped quite a bit, and that's because we completed a master plan and identified um some very large um vulnerabilities that we have in our storm system. And so those numbers and so it's a gap that we would describe.
openpublica.com