San Jose Rules and Open Government Committee Meeting - April 29, 2026
San Jose Rules and Open Government Committee Meeting - April 29, 2026
The San Jose Rules and Open Government Committee met on April 29, 2026, to review upcoming council meeting agendas, approve a consent calendar, and consider several action items including a revolving door waiver request, a proposal to expand ministerial approvals for housing, and alternative financing for affordable housing. The committee also received public comments on parks naming, encampment closures, and modular housing research. All votes were unanimous 5-0.
Meeting Agenda Reviews
- The committee reviewed the agenda for the next Tuesday’s council meeting (noticed for May 5, 2026), which includes a closed session at 9:30 a.m., regular session at 1:30 p.m., consent items, a library facilities and customer experience plan status report, approval of a park master plan and turnkey park land agreement for two city-chartered parks, and a public hearing on the annual action plan for HUD. The committee approved the agenda review 5-0.
- The committee also reviewed the agenda for the May 12, 2026 council meeting, which includes a public hearing on proposed budgets, an amendment to the airport master plan, republic services solid waste service rates, a 2026 major event status report, and a recommended deferral. No land use items. The committee approved the review 5-0.
Consent Calendar
- The committee approved three consent items unanimously (5-0). Prior to the vote, a public commenter (Brian) raised concerns about the closure of an encampment known as “the jungle,” stating that unhoused individuals report not feeling connected to services or receiving requested assistance, and that many lack transportation options. He urged the committee to look into the matter.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Brian (public comment on agenda review and consent) spoke in favor of naming parks after people rather than things, citing the need to avoid future renaming controversies. He referenced a letter from the Parks Commission that supported this approach.
- Brian (on consent) expressed concerns about the closing of “the jungle” encampment, noting that unhoused residents and daily visitors report a disconnect from services and a lack of transportation (e.g., no bus passes). He encouraged the committee to investigate further.
- Ryan (public comment on action item #3 – alternative financing for affordable housing) thanked the city and staff for their efforts and voiced support for the alternative financing work plan, offering to help offload some of the workload.
- Ryan (open forum) presented a seven-page report generated using AI that analyzed modular housing companies worldwide, ranking them A–D based on criteria relevant to California and San Jose. He stated he spent 25–30 hours verifying the information and offered the analysis to city staff to save them time.
Discussion Items
- Revolving Door Waiver Request (Diana Alanis): The committee considered a request from Diana Alanis, former community relations director for Councilmembers Duan and Davis, to waive the remaining 11 months of the city’s one-year revolving door policy. Ms. Alanis now works for Canyon Snow Consulting representing LS Power on energy and climate issues. She stated she did not work on LS Power matters while at the city. Staff explained the ordinance and the committee’s role in making a recommendation to the City Council. Councilmember Duan moved to grant the waiver, praising Ms. Alanis’s integrity. Vice Mayor Foley expressed concern about the frequent granting of exemptions, noting that two council members had waited 12 months before lobbying. She supported moving the waiver forward but called for a firmer policy. Councilmember Kamei agreed, questioning the purpose of a policy if exemptions are routinely granted. Chair Cohen noted that this request came only one month after separation, which is earlier than typical, and suggested a broader discussion on the policy’s purpose. The committee voted 5-0 to recommend the waiver to the City Council for final determination on May 5, 2026.
- Ministerial Approval for AB 130 Qualifying Projects: Councilmember Tordillos presented a memo co-authored with Councilmembers Kamei, Cohen, and Campos, proposing to expand the city’s ministerial approval process citywide, aligned with the eligibility criteria of AB 130. The memo highlighted a 10–30% reduction in development costs needed for feasibility and a demonstrated 50% reduction in permitting time from existing ministerial approvals. The committee approved a motion (5-0) to forward the memo for workload analysis, with the expectation of returning to the Rules Committee in one to two weeks before moving to the full City Council.
- Alternative Financing for Affordable Housing: Staff reported that a workload analysis had been completed and gave a green light; the item is part of the existing community and economic development work plan and is already underway. The committee voted 5-0 to approve moving forward.
Key Outcomes
- Approved agenda reviews for the May 5 and May 12, 2026 council meetings (5-0).
- Approved consent calendar (5-0).
- Recommended approval of revolving door waiver for Diana Alanis to the City Council; will be heard on May 5, 2026 (5-0).
- Approved ministerial approval memo for workload analysis, to return to Rules Committee in 1–2 weeks (5-0).
- Approved alternative financing for affordable housing as already underway (5-0).
Meeting Transcript
Okay, it's two o'clock, so we're going to call today's meeting of the rules and open government committee to order. Let's start with roll call, please. Candelas. Here. Foley. Here. Come here. Here. Cool. Here. Thank you. We have a core. Thank you. We're gonna going to start by reviewing the agenda for next Tuesday's council meeting. It's noticed for a 9 30 closed session and 1 30 regular open session. And consent starts on page five. Continues on page six and ends there. Section seven library facilities and customer experience plan status report and the approval of a park master plan and turnkey park land agreement for two city chartered parks. Section eight public hearing and approval of the annual action plan for HUD. And that is it. Do we have any public comment? Brian, please go ahead and make your way to the podium. Hello, everybody. Hope you're having a nice day. Thank you for letting me uh bring this to your attention. I'm here to discuss um I it's 7.2 on the agenda, and it's about parks naming. And I um just a little story. When um I was at uh I worked like folks know I worked at AgNews and they tore down Agnes, I think it was the East Side, and they built a bunch of schools and on the Ibeams. Um they let us sign. I consider it one of the best things I've ever had a chance to do in my life was to sign, but I didn't sign my name. Uh I signed two people, Lacey and Susan were both students I worked with, um, who were like a spectrum of the folks that went there anyways. I would recommend in your park naming that you think about naming it after people, because we've know that we've had to change a lot of names because something was found out about a particular individual. And um the even the parks commission, I think mentioned that in uh the letter they wrote to you. So we'd like you to think about that. There's I I gonna send an email. I think I already sent it, and this uh covers that. Um I just think it would be nice because parks are for everybody. I know we want to name stuff after people that inspire us. Well, uh to be honest with you, the nice guy, the 711 inspires me a lot too, if that makes any sense. Thank you. I appreciate your time. Back to the committee. Okay, do we have uh motion or any comments or questions? Second. Right. Seeing no discussion, let's vote. And that motion carries five zero, and we are going to review the agenda for May 12th, noticed for 9 30 closed session, 1 30 regular session. Consent is on page five. Section three, we have public hearing on the proposed budgets. Section five, an amendment to the airport master plan, section six republic services solid waste service rates, section eight, twenty twenty-six major event status report, and eight point two recommended deferral.
openpublica.com