Wed, May 20, 2026·San Jose, California·City Council

Rules and Open Government Committee Meeting Summary – May 20, 2026

Discussion Breakdown

Transportation Safety52%
Procedural48%

Summary

Rules and Open Government Committee Meeting Summary – May 20, 2026

The Rules and Open Government Committee met in joint session on May 20, 2026, at 2:00 PM. The meeting covered agenda approvals, consent calendar items, a deferral, and public comments on meeting decorum and traffic safety. Members present: Candelas, Foley, Come; Cohen absent.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of the draft agenda for June 2, 2026, including cancellation of the May 26 meeting
  • Consent calendar items (three items) approved unanimously without public comment

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Brian (public commenter) urged the committee to add a reciprocal expectation to the public meeting decorum policy, stating that while the current policy outlines public behavior (including potential arrest), it should also acknowledge that public letters and phone calls are documented and responded to. He asked for a written statement reflecting the city's commitment to acknowledging public input.

Discussion Items

  • Item C – Policy analysis of vacant commercial storefront activation tools: Deferred by committee motion. No public comment. Deferral approved unanimously.

Open Forum

  • Brian (public commenter) highlighted Memorial Day and the sacrifices of Medal of Honor recipients. He then addressed traffic safety, stating that 3,800 to 4,500 people are killed each year on California roads, with 200,000 to 250,000 injured, costing at least $6 billion in direct costs and tens of billions when social and medical factors are included. He argued that traffic safety is directly controlled by state and local authorities, unlike some divestment issues, and urged the committee to ask at every meeting what is being done to address dangerous driving (running red lights, failure to stop for school buses). He expressed concern that his previous complaints have not been acknowledged.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved the June 2, 2026 draft agenda (with consent calendar items through page 11) and cancellation of the May 26 meeting
  • Unanimously approved consent calendar items
  • Approved deferral of the vacant commercial storefront activation tools analysis
  • Meeting adjourned at 2:07 PM

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon. It's two o'clock, and I'd like to open the joint meeting for the rules and open government committee. Um roll call, please. Candelas here. Foley here. Come here. Cohen absent. We have a quorum. Thank you very much. Moving on to item A in our agenda. We uh have a cancellation of the May 26th meeting, and we have a draft agenda for June 2nd. Let's take a look at that. We have uh 9 30 a.m. closed session and uh regular session at 1 30. Uh we have consent starting on page five, going on to six, seven, eight, nine, ten, ending on page eleven, moving on to strategic support. We have uh reinstatement remote participation and amendments to council policy zero thirty-seven. We have public hearing on liens um on page 12. We have uh transportation aviation services on uh page 13, environmental services on 13 starting there, moving on to public hearing for residential garbage and recycling, uh public hearing for municipal water system on page 14. Going on to page 15, 6.4, public hearing for approving the Muni water system shortage contingency plan. Um we don't have anything in neighborhood services, community economic development starts on page 15, 8.1, 8.2, on page 16, 8.3, page 16, and then we have uh one item for the redevelopment successor agency on page 17. We have land use starting on page 17, going on to 18, and that's it. Is there any uh public comment? Yes, Brian. Thank you very much. This is the last part of the agenda, and it's on every agenda. It is the public meeting decorum, and all I would suggest is all this is understandable, but it's sort of an agreement between the people who participate on that side of the diet. It would be nice if something was written right on the same page, that our letters are lit red, our phone calls are answered, or at least documented in some way, and that that agreement between us sharing with you and you sharing with us is at least taking place as the same expectation that we have when we come here because at the end of this it says we can be arrested. Now, granted, that's an extreme example, and people aren't hauled out of here every day. Thank goodness. But if it makes sense, it does to me, maybe it doesn't to other people. It should be both ways that there's an agreement on that side of the dias that there is this. What we do does have an impact when we talk, when we write, when we make phone calls that it's it's numbered, it's tabulated. I know you can't give away with your methods of how you deal with your own internal communications with the public, but just something even generic because it does make a difference. Thank you. Thank you. Back to the committee, thank you. Move approval, second. There's a motion and a second. Any other questions? Listen, no, list vote. Motion passes. Thank you. Moving on to um item B consent calendar. We have one, two, three items on consent. Is there any questions on consent? Second. Okay. Public comment? No public comment. Okay, uh, seeing no question.