NewFri, Mar 6, 2026·San Jose, California·Planning Commission

Planning Director's Hearing: Japantown Retail-to-Residential Conversion Approval on March 4, 2026

Discussion Breakdown

Land Use69%
Procedural19%
Economic Development9%
Affordable Housing3%

Summary

Planning Director's Hearing: Consideration of Plan Development Permit Amendment for 620 North 6th Street

A single public hearing was held to consider a plan development permit amendment to convert vacant ground-floor retail space into 11 residential units at 620 North 6th Street in Japantown. After presentations, public comment, and deliberation, the hearing officer approved the amendment, finding it consistent with the city's general plan and zoning.

Consent Calendar

  • The single agenda item, a plan development permit amendment (File PDA 15-055-02), was initially placed on the consent calendar but was moved to the public hearing portion upon a request to speak.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Jordan, a resident of an adjacent Japantown apartment complex, expressed appreciation for the developer's previous work but disappointment at the proposed reduction of commercial space. The speaker noted that while housing is needed, 11 units represent a small addition compared to the significant loss of commercial opportunity, which is limited in Japantown. Jordan suggested that the retail market might improve and that building out the space could make it more attractive to tenants.

Discussion Items

  • Staff Presentation (Laura Miners, Planning Project Manager): Outlined the request to convert approximately 14,500 sq ft of ground-floor retail into 11 residential units at an existing six-story building. The amendment includes minor exterior modifications and extended Saturday construction hours for interior work. The project is consistent with the Transit Residential general plan designation and Plan Development zoning, requires a finding for a design guideline exception related to unit access, and is covered by an addendum to a prior Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
  • Applicant's Remarks (Sean M., representing Shea Properties): Stated that converting a portion of the retail to residential was the "last option" after nearly five years of unsuccessful efforts to lease the space for various uses (food hall, performing arts center, medical office, childcare). The applicant expressed that mixed-use projects are difficult and that this conversion was the best remaining way to activate the street level while retaining three corner retail suites.
  • Hearing Officer's Questions: The officer inquired about preserving transparent, street-active storefronts and the unit design. The applicant explained that due to flood zone requirements, operable residential windows would mimic the retail storefront appearance, but unit entrances would be from the interior parking garage. The units were designed to be larger (~1,100 sq ft) to add variety for families or couples and have upgraded finishes. The applicant also noted one of the three retained retail suites is leased to a pet grooming business soon to begin build-out.
  • Staff Clarification: In response to public comment, staff clarified that the original development agreement for the block specified 16,000-24,000 sq ft of commercial space, and the lost square footage from this conversion would be offset by more commercial space in a forthcoming project (Tyco project) on the block.

Key Outcomes

  • The hearing officer approved the plan development permit amendment and the associated CEQA addendum, finding the project consistent with the Transit Residential general plan, Plan Development zoning, and relevant policies. The approval adds 11 residential units (bringing the total to 230) and reduces ground-floor retail to approximately 3,500 sq ft.
  • Vote Tally: Not applicable, as this was a hearing officer's decision.
  • Next Steps: The planning director's action is final unless appealed per municipal code requirements.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning. We are calling to order the Planning Director hearing of March 4th, 2026. My name is Sylvia Doe and I am the hearing officer for today's agenda on behalf of and delegated by the Director of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement, Christopher Burton. This meeting is being held via Zoom conference call. Members of the public may participate by following the instructions listed on page two of the agenda. If you would like to provide public comment, you have two methods to do so. For participants who joined electronically and have audio input available on their computer or smartphone, they can use the raised hand feature in Zoom during the agenda item they would like to speak to or click star 9 on their phone. Remember to keep your raised hand feature on until planning support staff identify your turn to speak. During the meeting, you can also call 408-535-8517 or email planning support staff at San Jose CA.gov and identify your name that's listed on Zoom, the phone number that you'll call into Zoom with, and what item or items you would like to comment on. All members of the public will remain on mute until the individual identifies they would like to speak and they are unmuted. Planning support staff will identify you by name when it is your turn to speak. At that time, you will be unmuted and can provide comment for the allotted time. If you exceed your allotted time, you may be muted so we can move on to the next speaker. Please note the following. The hearing procedure and order of input will be as follows. I will first identify each project as listed on the agenda. For those items on the consent calendar, I will ask if anyone wishes to speak on the item. If a separate discussion is warranted, I will move the item to the public hearing portion of the agenda. If a separate discussion is not needed, the item will remain on the consent calendar for approval. For those items listed under public hearing, I will ask staff to provide a brief report. The applicant or the representative who wishes to speak on the item will have up to five minutes to speak and should identify themselves by stating their name for the record. After the applicant or their representative has spoken, any member of the public who wishes to speak on the item may provide testimony up to two minutes per speaker, either for or against the project. All members of the public should identify their name for the record, although it is not required. Following comments from the public, the applicant may make additional remarks for up to five minutes. I will then close the public hearing and I may ask staff to answer questions, respond to comments made by the applicant or the public, or further discuss the item. I will then take action on the item. If you challenge these land use decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at this public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. The planning director's actions on agenda items will be final when the permit is signed and mailed, unless the permit or the environmental clearance determination is appealed. The planning director's actions on the permits are appealable in accordance with the requirements of Title 20 of the Municipal Code. The planning director's actions on the environmental review for the permits under the California Environmental Quality Act are separately appealable in accordance with the requirements of Title 21 of the Municipal Code. Before we begin, I want to remind members of the public to follow our code of conduct at meetings. This includes commenting on the specific agenda item only. Public speakers will not engage in a conversation with the hearing officer or staff. The hearing officer, staff, and the public are expected to refrain from abusive language. Repeated failure to comply with the code of conduct, which will disturb, disrupt, or impede the orderly conduct of this meeting may result in the removal from the meeting. The meeting of the director's hearing will now come to order. On to the next portion of the agenda number two, which is deferrals. Any item scheduled for hearing this morning for which deferral to a future meeting date is being requested will be moved to this portion of the agenda and considered on the matter of deferral. I will identify any items to be deferred and ask for comments from the public. If you want to change any of the deferral dates or speak to the question of deferring these or any other items, please use the raised hand feature in Zoom or click star 9 to raise your hand to speak. I will now open the public hearing. And as of this morning, there are no items proposed for deferral. Are there any members of the public or staff who has updates to the deferrals portion of the agenda? If so, please raise your hand in Zoom or click star nine. Okay. Seeing none, the matter of deferrals is now closed, and we will move on to the next portion of the agenda, which is the consent calendar. There will be no separate discussion of individual consent calendar items as they are considered to be routine and will be considered in one action unless an item is moved to the public hearing calendar for separate discussion by the hearing officer. The public may comment on the entire consent calendar and any items removed from the consent calendar by the hearing officer. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please use the raised hand feature in Zoom or click star 9 to raise your hand to speak. This morning we have one item on the consent calendar, which is the only item agendized for this morning's director's hearing, which is item number 3A.