Finance Committee Reviews FY 26-27 Proposed Biennial Budget - May 5, 2025
Finance Committee Reviews FY 26-27 Proposed Biennial Budget - May 5, 2025
On May 5, 2025, the San Leandro Finance Committee met to review the proposed Fiscal Year 2026-27 biennial budget. The meeting focused on the city's persistent structural deficit, with Finance Director Nicole Gonzales presenting a 10-year forecast showing expenditures outpacing revenues. The committee directed staff to align General Fund operating expenditures with revenue estimates and to achieve a balanced budget within three years, while also incorporating previously mandated programs such as the Alternative Response Unit (ARU), rent registry, and encampment cleanup.
Note: The agenda and minutes for this meeting are dated April 23, 2025, but the user has specified the meeting date as May 5, 2025.
Discussion Items
- Budget Overview and Structural Deficit: Finance Director Gonzales presented the budget strategies, including reductions in discretionary spending (training, travel, office supplies, fixed assets) and aligning personnel costs with actual needs. The general fund forecast before the proposed budget projected a use of reserves: $7.8 million in FY26 and $10.8 million in FY27. After the proposed budget, the use of reserves increased to $9.8 million in FY26 (including $1.5 million for a fire engine) and $10.2 million in FY27. The 10-year forecast showed the city depleting its fund balance by FY30, with a negative $4.3 million, and failing to meet the 20% reserve policy by FY28.
- Fund Balance Policy: The city's current policy requires $5 million for major emergencies and 20% of expenditures for economic uncertainties. The committee discussed that the available unassigned fund balance of $31.9 million is sufficient to meet the 20% target ($30.6 million) but not both categories. A proposal to temporarily suspend the PULL policy (which directs 50% of surplus to pension trusts) for FY25-26 was discussed to allow unspent funds to strengthen the general fund balance.
- Capital and Infrastructure Needs: The budget includes $7.4 million in transfers for capital and other needs, including $3.6 million for road overlay, $600,000 for city building maintenance, $475,000 for park maintenance, $150,000 for ADA transition, and $1.5 million for fleet (fire vehicle). The committee questioned the classification of some items (e.g., Link shuttle, parking fund subsidy) as capital.
- ARPA-Funded Projects: Several programs currently funded with one-time ARPA dollars ($18.6 million total) would require $1.0 million in FY26 and $1.7 million in FY27 from the general fund if continued. These include the Alternative Response Unit (ARU), encampment cleanup, and small business technical assistance.
- Pension and OPEB: The city's pension trust (115 trust) helps manage unfunded liabilities, with the miscellaneous plan 73.5% funded and the safety plan 70.9% funded. OPEB is nearly 94% funded. The committee discussed the unpredictability of CalPERS rates and the need to prepare for economic uncertainty.
- Committee Priorities: Councilmember Viveros-Walton emphasized including ARU, rent registry, and encampment cleanup in the budget. Councilmember Aguilar supported fiscal prudence and balancing the budget. Mayor Gonzalez stressed the need to address the spending problem and bring expenditures in line with revenues, suggesting a three-year target for eliminating the structural deficit.
Key Outcomes
- Direction to Staff: The committee directed staff to align General Fund operating expenditures with revenue estimates and to achieve total expenditures (including transfers) equal to total revenue within three years (by FY28).
- Inclusion of Programs: Staff was directed to include the Alternative Response Unit, rent registry program (estimated at $650,000 per year), and encampment cleanup in the budget.
- Temporary Suspension of PULL Policy: The committee supported temporarily suspending the Prioritizing Unfunded Liability Liquidation (PULL) policy for FY25 and FY26, allowing all unspent funds at year-end to be retained in the general fund balance.
- Next Steps: Staff will return to the Finance Committee with a revised budget proposal before forwarding to the City Council. A city council work session is scheduled for May 12, 2025, to review departmental budgets, and a public hearing and adoption are planned for June 2, 2025. The committee also requested a preview of potential service-level impacts from the required cuts.
Meeting Transcript
What days today? It's four o'clock. That's the important part. So it's four o'clock on Wednesday for calling order of the finance committee meeting selling city council. The 26th and 27th proposed by annual budget. Councilmember Vieiros Walton is not currently here. I have Councilmember Aguilar. Mayor Gonzalez. And then Clark, would you please talk to your answer? After each agenda item is presented, the mayor will ask for committee member comments and then take public comment. You will have two minutes for your comment. Account down timer will appear for the convenience of the speaker and attendees. So with that, we will move to our discussion item. Our single discussion item will involve a lot of discussion today, I am sure. It's our proposed by annual budget, and we've got finance directory and global solid specifically. Thank you, Mayor. Good evening, mayor and committee members. The item before this evening is to discuss the city's proposed fiscal years 26-27 biannual budget presentation. Just to kind of go over a quick agenda of today's item. Some budget strategies that helped us develop that budget, general fund forecast update, budget overview. We'll do a view of general fund reductions and savings, review of capital funding needs, an overview of the city's pension and op trust, and then some uh discussion around KERT, ARPA funded projects that if continuation would be augmentation from the general fund for continuation. Okay, and just for our record, because it is recorded. I didn't want to say that while you were speaking, we could have our last council member come in. So thank you for joining us. Thank you. Um so um as we we began developing the proposed fiscal year 26-27 by annual budget, several key driving factors were considered as they do impact uh the decision uh potential as we prepare for the upcoming two fiscal years. So the first and foremost was a focus on um working towards fiscal stability. So it's a major focus for the city for the council, um, and so that was our primary focus, um, and we wanted to identify things that were attributing to uh the city's ability to um work towards that fiscal sustainability goal. Um, some of those factors are that we are looking to align our budget to actual needs and costs, so being very mindful about um what is going into the budget based on our actual needs and the costs that we're seeing in the market. Um also driving factors in hacking this budget are increased employee costs, that includes the cost of uh personnel, as well as uh benefits including including rising costs as it relates to uh medical intentional and some of the other benefits that we offer to employees. Um we did look at uh reducing discretionary budgets, but still um wanted to ensure that we're preserving service levels. So some of the discretionary uh costs that we looked at were things that did not impact service levels, such as uh training and travel, office supplies, fixed assets, and etc. Um, also contributing to our ability to uh forecast a fiscal stability scenario was the rising cost of pension and OPEC costs, um balancing the city's needs uh for both capital and internal service needs due to aging facilities and aging infrastructure. And then last but not least, the economic uncertainties that we have seen over the last several months are also impacting our uh preparation for the explanation for two years. So again, some of the budget strategies that we we looked at that we um implemented during this budget process was first looking at discretionary costs. So again, looking at reductions in areas of services and supplies, but also ensuring that we are preserving those service levels. We wanted to make sure that those doctors that we were making were having the least at all no impact on the service levels to the community. Um additional um uh strategies included looking at the city's internal service fund and uh looking to prioritize our fleet uh replacement schedule and needs, uh also looking to defer uh technology enhancements throughout the uh organization throughout the city, um, but also aligning our budget with our actual needs. Also looking to defer technology enhancements throughout the organization throughout the city, but also aligning our budget with our actual needs. The other thing that we looked at was at fixed assets, which often are related to the replacement of office furniture, purchase of equipment as it relates to maintenance services. We did temporarily suspend or reduce those budgets for the next two fiscal years. And then last, we did look at personnel costs, establishing realistic onboarding of vacant positions, so including anticipation of attrition through retirements, making sure that we are trying to line up as closely as possible with known factors of our current vacancies, as well as anticipated vacancies and how long it takes for those positions to actually be filled with these. So we're gonna jump into a little bit more detail about the city's uh general fund forecast, and before we do so, I wanted to make sure that we talked a little bit about some key things that help us understand and why it's important to focus on a 10-year forecast. And so, first, what is a what is a fund balance? So a fund balance represents the difference between the city's total assets and its current and future liabilities. It essentially shows the net available resources in a particular fund at any given time. Some of those categories that we see, and you'll see them in the model itself, are uh non-spendable, which are resources that cannot be spent, restricted resources that are external restrictions, those are often like tied to specific funds related to grants and grant obligations, uh, committed, which is set aside for a specific purpose by a formal government action. Assigned is intended for specific purposes but not legally restricted. So those are some of the things that you might see in that area are encumbrances. So services and supplies that are currently encumbered are assigned and unassigned are available for any purpose at the discretion of the city council.
openpublica.com