San Leandro, California — Public Meeting Index

Note: The agenda and transcript indicate the meeting took place on September 15, 2026, but the instructions specify October 14, 2026. This summary reflects the content of the September 15 meeting as provided. The Arts, Culture and Library Commission held a regular meeting on September 15, 2026, at the Main Library. Commissioners reviewed staff reports, a presentation on a youth media program, and took action on project planning and a car show award. The meeting lasted from 6:30 PM to 7:36 PM. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes of the July 21, 2026 meeting without discussion. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made on non-agenda items. Presentations - GMAA Story Studio by Generation Music & Arts Academy: Robert Bolitao, Executive Director, presented a pilot program to teach underserved youth digital media skills (video, photography, editing) using their own phones. The program culminates in a red carpet showcase at the Ball Theater. Bolitao asked for community partnerships and leads, not direct funding. Commissioners expressed strong support, particularly for the rights management and intergenerational storytelling aspects. Commissioner Scotland offered to volunteer as a photographer. Discussion Items - 1% for Art Update (Staff Report): The library director met with community development staff; they are researching parameters for a 1% fee on private development (as recommended in the Arts Master Plan). A proposal is expected to come before the commission in October or November 2025. - Commission Project Planning (7.A): The commission adopted a rolling process for submitting and reviewing project ideas using a standard form. Ideas will be presented at meetings, and a full prioritization exercise will occur annually in July (to align with the fiscal year). The motion carried. - Rides & Readers Car Show Award (7.B): The commission voted to sponsor a new "Most Artistic Classic Vehicle Award" for the library's 5th annual car show on September 19, 2026. Commissioners Miller, Alix, and Acevedo volunteered as judges. The motion carried. Commission Reports & Announcements - Grants Committee: A summary letter was sent to city council showcasing funded projects. The committee will soon prepare for the next grant cycle. Commissioner Alix expressed interest in joining and also proposed a separate fundraising committee. - Library Bike Tour Committee: Commissioner Alix reported outreach to Cycles of Change and Bike East Bay. Bike East Bay offered free workshops (space provided by library). A committee meeting is set for September 29. - Poetry Contest Committee: Commissioner Acevedo contacted local poets; timing will be coordinated with the library for spring 2026. - Other Announcements: Commissioner Scotland attended a community art chat in the Manor neighborhood where 1% for art was discussed. Commissioner Alix attended a regional Friends of the Library meeting and shared ideas about fundraising. Opportunities for commissioners to support existing events (e.g., Juneteenth, Lunar New Year) were noted. Key Outcomes - Motion passed (unanimous) to accept project ideas on a rolling basis using the project plan form, with a full prioritization exercise each July. - Motion passed (unanimous) to sponsor the "Most Artistic Classic Vehicle Award" at the library car show on September 19, 2026; three commissioners will serve as judges. - The grants committee will begin preparations for the next grant cycle, with potential changes minor. - A new fundraising committee may be formed after a commissioner submits a project proposal.

The San Leandro City Council held a special meeting on October 13, 2026, to address a ballot error by the Alameda County Registrar of Voters that threatened the implementation of district-based elections approved by Measure F. The sole action item was a resolution requesting the Registrar to tabulate and report election results by precinct for Council Districts 1, 2, 3, and 5 in the November 3, 2026 election. The resolution passed unanimously. Note: The agenda and transcript list the meeting as Monday, October 12, 2026 at 7:00 PM, while the meeting timestamp provided is 2026-10-13 15:00 UTC. Consent Calendar - None. Public Comments & Testimony - Joseph Trujillo (District 3 candidate, 18-year resident): Expressed full support for transparency, accountability, and swift corrective action. He formally called on the City Council and City Clerk to work aggressively with Alameda County election officials to secure an immediate, transparent, and legally sound remedy, ensuring every eligible vote is counted and that final results accurately reflect the will of the districts. - James Mays (15-year resident): Expressed disappointment and concern about the incorrect ballots. He asked how the city would communicate the remedy to residents and what contingency plan exists if the county cannot correct the tabulation. He urged the council to take action quickly, including a remedied ballot or a back-end computer fix. - Lee Thomas: Emphasized the importance of open communication between the city, county, and candidates, especially those impacted, so that candidates can reassure voters. He said the city and county must keep lines of communication open and ensure a fair and transparent process. - Douglas Spaulding (online): Urged voters not to become cynical and to vote. He said the error undermines electoral integrity and has affected the District 3 campaign. He supported counting ballots in Districts 1, 2, and 5 on a district basis as well, and urged full embrace of district elections. - Robert Bulatao (online): Said he appreciates the city addressing the ballot issues, but asked where the breakdown in communication occurred—whether it was an administrative error by the county or a city failure. He urged establishing a permanent procedure for future elections and identifying safeguards so this does not happen again in 2028. - Alvaro Remos (online): Asked whether in-person ballots on Election Day would have the same error. He demanded transparency and clear instructions for voters, stating that the city and county are at fault for negligence in implementing district-based elections. He urged the city to take responsibility, fix the problem, and prevent recurrence. - Urban Res Life (online): Acknowledged Indigenous People’s Day and the Ohlone people. He concurred with previous speakers and asked whether the issue was caused by AI or a human error. Discussion Items - City Attorney Rich Pierota provided background: On June 16, 2025, the council adopted Ordinance 2025-009 changing the election method from a hybrid system to district-based elections. A February 2, 2026 resolution called a special municipal election for the charter amendment, consolidated with the June 2, 2026 statewide primary. Measure F passed overwhelmingly with 87.33% in favor and 12.67% opposed. The Registrar certified the June 2, 2026 results on June 26, and the City Council declared them on July 6. Measure F took effect July 1, but the ballots for the November 3, 2026 election were printed using the old at-large system. - The proposed resolution was revised after discussions with the Registrar to request results by individual precincts within Districts 1, 2, 3, and 5, so results can be reported both by district and by precinct. Districts 1, 2, and 5 have unopposed candidates; District 3 has a contested race. - Mayor Gonzalez asked whether there was any AI connection to the miscommunication. The City Manager said no. The Mayor also asked about finger-pointing; the City Manager said county and city staff have been working collaboratively. - The Mayor asked whether ballots would be modified. The City Manager stated that the Registrar informed them the ballot will not be modified. - Councilmember Sue Bowen asked why a resolution was needed instead of an email. The City Attorney explained the resolution authorizes the City Manager to work with the Registrar and potentially negotiate an MOU, and it makes the council’s intent explicit. The resolution applies only to the November 2026 election. - Councilmember Bowen confirmed that residents should use the ballots they received, and that voting for a candidate outside one’s district will not disqualify the ballot. Only voters within the district will have their votes counted for that district’s race. She suggested public outreach via local newspapers, social media, and mailers, particularly to District 3. - The Vice Mayor asked about the communication plan. The City Manager said a splash page has been added on the city’s website, and a new page at sanleandro.org/districtelections will be updated. Multilingual outreach will be included. Asked about the cost of mailing physical letters, the City Manager said costs have not yet been estimated. Key Outcomes - The council adopted the revised resolution (as shown on screen) unanimously on a 5-0 vote. - The resolution calls on the Alameda County Registrar of Voters to report precinct-level results for Council Districts 1, 2, 3, and 5 in the November 3, 2026 election, allowing district-based results consistent with Measure F. - It authorizes the City Manager to continue working with the Registrar and to negotiate an agreement or MOU for implementing the reporting. - The ballot will not be modified; residents should use the ballots they have received. - The city will update its district elections webpage and provide multilingual communications to inform residents about how votes will be counted.

On October 6, 2026 (the agenda listed October 5), the San Leandro City Council held a regular meeting. The council issued proclamations for Crime Prevention Month and Domestic Violence Awareness Month, unanimously approved the consent calendar, and after extended debate and public testimony, approved a sole-source contract with Peregrine Technologies for a data integration platform by a 4-3 vote. The approval included conditions for annual performance audits, independent police auditor access audits, and a referral to the rules committee to develop policies on artificial intelligence and data sharing. Consent Calendar - Unanimously approved. Key item: Resolution authorizing a $860,118 roof replacement contract for Fire Station 10 (Garland/DBS, Inc.) with up to $38,705 in change orders and $273,823 in carryover funds. - Also approved minutes, a nomination to the Arts, Culture, and Library Commission, and committee minutes. Recognitions - Crime Prevention Month: Mayor Gonzalez presented a proclamation to Chad Penabaker and Pastor Toby Nelson of First Presbyterian Church, highlighting collaborative camera-distribution programs with the police department. - Domestic Violence Awareness Month: Jessica Rogers of Building Futures accepted a proclamation, noting the crisis line (1-866-A-WAY-OUT) and local shelter services. Public Comments (Non-Agenda Items) - Mike Katz-Lacabe criticized Flock license plate readers, stating they detect people (not just vehicles) and cited a 71% false-alert rate in Roseville; he argued the city conducts mass surveillance despite the mayor's denial. - Leo T. West voiced concerns about election security, urging a vote against Proposition 39. - Douglas Spaulding urged a moratorium on data centers, citing a recently approved conditional use permit for a 14.9-acre site, and criticized stalled housing protections. - Alvaro Ramos urged voters to reject five propositions (39, 41, 42, 43, 45), claiming they would restrict voting, cut public services, and deregulate environmental review. - Leslie Watson thanked Councilmember Bowen for addressing the feral cat problem but noted the ongoing impact and requested proactive communication from the city. Discussion Items 10a. Peregrine Technologies Data Integration Platform - Presentation: Police Lieutenant Ted Munn described Peregrine as a historical data integration tool that connects existing police systems (CAD, RMS, Axon body cameras, etc.) to allow unified searching, mapping, and deduplication. It is not a surveillance system and does not use facial recognition. The AI component (Peregrine Pro) is optional and uses natural-language queries with guardrails to prevent biased or predictive policing. - Budget: $405,000 for the initial three-year term, with two one-year optional renewals at $150,000 each (total not-to-exceed $705,000), funded entirely from the state Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (Frontline) – no general fund impact. The contract was a sole-source procurement justified under California Public Contract Code Section 3400(c). - Council Questions: - Councilmember Victor Aguilar questioned sole-source justification, data sharing with ICE (assured it complies with SB 54 and ICE will not receive data), and facial recognition (denied). - Councilmember Bowen asked about integration with future CAD systems, audit capability, and data-sharing agreements. She proposed annual audits and a referral to the Community Police Review Board (CPRB) – later incorporated into the motion. - Vice Mayor Walton pressed on AI policy (city has a draft 98% complete but not finalized), guardrails against data leakage/hallucinations, and the problem being solved (efficiency in crime analysis). - Councilmember Simon inquired about neighboring agencies (most Bay Area departments are Peregrine customers), safeguards against racial profiling, and how efficiency translates to street-level safety. - Councilmember Bolt expressed concerns about losing control of shared data and requested concrete pros and cons. - Public Testimony on 10a: Three in-person and three online speakers. Critics (including Mike Katz-Lacabe, Jeff Krop, Alvaro Ramos) argued the contract lacked transparency, should have been reviewed by the CPRB, posed risks of data misuse, and noted the absence of a scope of work or independent validation. Speaker Douglas Spaulding equated the $705,000 cost to a fire station repair and opposed what he called a “surveillance system.” - Legal Clarification: Deputy City Manager Eric Engelbarter stated the CPRB’s scope does not include contract review, though policy changes (e.g., AI or data-sharing policies) would fall under its purview. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar: Approved unanimously. - Peregrine Contract Approved 4-3: Motion by Mayor Gonzalez, seconded by Councilmember Simon, with friendly amendments from Councilmember Bowen (annual performance audit and independent police auditor access audit) and a referral to the rules committee to develop AI and data-sharing policies, including formal MOUs. The motion carried 4-3: - Yes: Mayor Juan Gonzalez, Councilmembers Fred Simon, Sue Bowen, and James Aguilar. - No: Vice Mayor Viverous Walton, Councilmembers Victor Aguilar and Dylan Bolt. - Condition: The AI component (Peregrine Pro) is included but will be subject to future council policy direction developed via the rules committee. - Next Steps: Staff to finalize the contract; city manager to negotiate; rules committee to begin work on AI policy and data-sharing guardrails; annual reports to council on measurable outcomes.

The Finance Committee met on October 6, 2026, beginning at 5:30 PM and adjourning at approximately 6:50 PM, to receive the Fiscal Year 2026 Preliminary Year-End Financial and Performance Measures Report as of June 30, 2026. Committee members present were Mayor Gonzalez, Vice Mayor Vivero Salton, and Councilmember Victoria Agia. Staff emphasized that the results are preliminary, final adjustments are still being made, and the annual audit is expected to come before the City Council at the beginning of the next calendar year, with final results anticipated around February. The agenda and raw transcript list the meeting date as September 30, 2026; this summary uses the supplied meeting timestamp of October 6, 2026. The item was informational; no formal action was taken. Fiscal Year 2026 Preliminary Year-End Financial Report - General fund revenues totaled $150.2 million in FY 2026, an increase of about 2% from $147.7 million in FY 2025, and were favorable relative to the amended budget of $149.4 million. - The other tax category rose 15% year-over-year, largely from increased transient occupancy tax. Charges for services rose significantly due to fee study implementation and increased regulation/programming; interest income remained robust but lower year-over-year. Utility users tax declined by roughly 5% year-over-year, attributed to declining cable/telephone revenue, remittance timing, and streaming-service trends. Fines, fees, and forfeitures showed a negative year-over-year result (approximately -$200,000) due to reversal of code enforcement citations after voluntary compliance; the citations spanned multiple fiscal years. - Property tax followed its long-term 3% trend, driven by secured property tax. Sales tax projections had been reduced by $2.5 million at the April 6 mid-year budget amendment, but results were still favorable. Property transfer tax lagged projections due to high interest rates, limited housing supply, and economic uncertainty. Intergovernmental revenue increased due to FEMA reimbursements. - Expenditures against the total authorized/amended budget of $165.6 million were $154.3 million, leaving an $11.3 million remaining balance. Staff noted that carryover funds for ongoing initiatives will be brought back for committee and council authorization. Salaries and benefits were within budget with about a 2% year-over-year change; some apparent savings in services and supplies may reflect initiatives carrying over. - Enterprise, internal service, and parking funds had a combined revenue budget of $61 million and actual revenues of $69.1 million. Combined budgeted expenditures were $121.8 million, heavily influenced by the water pollution control plant capital program; unspent capital funds are expected to carry over. - Water pollution control plant revenue reflected a 9% approved user fee increase and grant funds. The Shoreline Enterprise includes activity related to bankruptcy proceedings. Stormwater revenue is static at $1.1 million plus a general fund transfer; grant funds are tracked in a separate grant fund. A committee member asked for clearer visibility into the full cost of the stormwater system. - Staff acknowledged an error in the expenditure percent-of-amended-budget column; columns E and F were accurate, and the slide/table would be corrected and republished or distributed after the meeting. Performance Measures Report - City Manager's Office: employee engagement increased 60% against a 5% target; liability/tort claims resolved within 180 days were below target; sewer cleaning would exceed the 80% annual target when reclaimed network miles are factored in. - Finance: the statutory state submission deadline/no audit findings target is anticipated to be met but is pending the audit; FY 2025 achieved the target. ERP milestones were met. Bank reconciliation remained a work in progress and did not achieve the 75% target; staff said the new system should allow more efficient closing. - Library: annual visits greatly exceeded the target (the transcript cites a target of 292, likely 292,000 in the written report); circulation remained strong; program attendance reached 65 per program against a target of 61. Staff noted FY 2026 service reductions, including no Sundays, reduced Monday hours, and Mulford's closure during renovation; farmers market traffic and special events contributed to visits. - Recreation and Parks: annual recreation program registrations totaled 12,989 against a target of 12,100. Facility rental hours were below target because of delayed online activation of court/gym rentals (about 1,500 hours) and closure of Activity Room C at the Marina Center for renovation (about 1,000 hours). Driving range bucket sales were below target due to wet fall/winter conditions. - Community Agency Funding: the target was initially 575 and was revised after reviewing how community partners measure; actual individuals served was 7,513, exceeding the target because partners leveraged city dollars. Flex ride trips increased by more than 5% due to community outreach. - Public Works: illegal dumping cleanups hit 98% against a 95% target (excluding encampments); traffic signal outages resolved within one business day hit 100% against a 95% target. Committee members encouraged adding graffiti metrics, tightening cleanup timelines, and showing more externally visible metrics. - Community Development: building plan checks completed within 10 days exceeded the 75% target; commercial incentive funds supported 6 businesses against a target of 3. - Fire: emergency response first-unit arrival under five minutes beat the 90% target by one percentage point; plan-check time frame targets were met. - Police: the report covered officer hiring goals and completion of annual bias training; the transcript is unclear on the exact hiring count. Committee Member Comments & Staff Responses - Committee members asked for more granular revenue reporting: UUT category breakdowns, property transfer tax by residential/commercial/industrial, franchise fee road-impact component tracked separately, and historical/time-series performance data. - The city attorney advised that recent legislation allows the city to continue existing road-impact fee collection without executing a contract amendment; the road impact fee is being tracked separately from franchise fees. - Members discussed code enforcement metrics and the reversal of citations, emphasizing that the city should understand whether reversals indicate improved voluntary compliance or slow enforcement follow-through. - A finance terminology discussion clarified the difference between council authorization/approval, appropriation of specific funds, and encumbrance of contract funds; members asked staff to use consistent terms in future reports. - A committee member challenged the budgeting practice of appropriating a large amount (e.g., $121.8 million) when actual spending is much lower, and asked that future budgets reflect expected annual spending while recognizing carryover separately. - Staff clarified that the presented metrics are FY 2026 targets already approved by council; suggestions for new metrics would be considered for future performance measure cycles. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made during the agenda item or the non-agenda public comment period. Key Outcomes - The committee received the preliminary FY 2026 year-end financial and performance measures report as informational; no formal motion or vote was taken. - Staff will correct the expenditure percent-of-budget slide and republish or distribute corrected materials. - Staff will consider providing more detailed revenue breakdowns (UUT categories, property transfer tax by property type, franchise fee/road impact separation) and clearer carryover/budget terminology in presentations to the City Council. - Final audited results are expected to be presented to the City Council in February after the annual audit.

The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM and adjourned at 9:11 PM. The commission considered a conditional use permit, site plan review, and height exception for a new warehouse/distribution facility. After public testimony and deliberation, the project was approved with specific conditions addressing data center conversion, vibration monitoring, and rodent mitigation. Consent Calendar - 26-366 Draft Meeting Minutes of July 2, 2026: Approved unanimously (4-0-1, with one abstention). Public Comments & Testimony - Chris Urban Res Life Longoria (San Leandro resident, Caddo Nation citizen) expressed concern about potential data center use, urged caution on zoning updates, and highlighted environmental justice issues. - During the public hearing, multiple speakers representing labor unions (Labors Union Local 304, Carpenters Union Local 713, IBEW Local 595) expressed strong support for the project, emphasizing local union jobs, fair wages, and apprenticeship opportunities. Speakers included Alejandro Martinez, Victor de la Torre, Daniel Garcia, Jason Gumatalto, Brent Hog, and Daniel Gregg. - Residents and community members (Mike McGuire, Sarah Bailey, Tao Li, Ginny Madsen, Karen Diaz, Douglas Spaulding) voiced concerns about potential data center conversion, truck traffic impacts on roads, noise for adjacent residential neighborhoods, environmental risks from contaminated soils, and inadequate buffering for Davis Street Community Center. Some residents acknowledged the project’s improvements but remained wary of future conversion. Discussion Items - 7A. PLN24-0030 – 3199 Alvarado Street Warehouse/Distribution Facility: The project proposes a 241,400 sq. ft., 46-foot-tall warehouse on a 14.9-acre lot in the IG (Industrial General) zoning district. Staff (Laura Torres) presented the project’s compliance with state AB98 requirements (truck circulation, buffer setbacks, energy efficiency), a Mitigated Negative Declaration under CEQA with mitigation measures for cultural resources, tree protection, and hazardous materials (due to the DWA plume). The applicant (Chandler Elliott, CC Industries) clarified the site is not a data center, emphasized union labor partnerships, and committed to enhanced landscaping and EV charging. - Commissioner discussion focused on concerns about potential data center conversion, road damage, construction vibration, and rodent mitigation. Vice Chair Mendoza proposed an outright ban on data centers on the site; legal counsel advised that a use permit cannot ban a use not proposed, but a condition can clarify that any future data center requires a new CUP. Commissioner Rich moved to approve with conditions proposed by staff. Key Outcomes - Approval of PLN24-0030 passed with a vote of 4-1 (Commissioner Nay and Zuber absent; Vice Chair Mendoza dissented on data center ban). The approval includes the following conditions: 1. Authorized Use Condition: The conditional use permit authorizes warehouse/storage/wholesale/retail distribution uses only; any future proposal for a major utilities use, including a data center, requires a new conditional use permit and CEQA review. 2. Vibration Monitoring: Prior to building permits, a vibration study must be prepared and measures implemented to minimize impacts on adjacent residential properties; monitoring during construction required. 3. Rodent/Pest Mitigation: A survey and mitigation plan must be conducted prior to demolition. - The project aligns with the city’s general plan and economic development strategy, and the site will remain in industrial use. The decision is final unless appealed to the City Council within 15 days.

Note: The meeting minutes and transcript indicate September 10, 2026, but the provided meeting date is September 25, 2026. This summary uses the specified date. The Facilities & Transportation Committee of the San Leandro City Council met on September 25, 2026, to receive an informational update on Monarch Bay Golf Club operations and strategic capital planning. The presentation highlighted a record fiscal year, ongoing renovations, and plans to enhance the golf experience, clubhouse hospitality, driving range amenities, and community integration. Committee members discussed capital funding, resident access, and the need for long-term planning. Six members of the public provided comments, ranging from praise for improvements to calls for further investment and management changes. No formal votes were taken. Public Comments & Testimony - Joe Stewart – Resident and regular golfer: Commended recent improvements but argued they represent only 40% of needed work. Cited a National Golf Foundation (NGF) study commissioned by the city showing declining customer satisfaction (2026: 7.6 vs. 2025: 7.7) and projected net revenue decline. Noted that American Golf Corporation (AGC) allowed deferred maintenance requiring $4–5 million in catch-up spending. Recommended the city seek a private partner willing to invest $5–7 million, calling AGC a "third-rate operator." Provided handouts to the committee. - Liz – Member of Marina Women's Group: Appreciated recent changes but asked about future event pricing and whether outside food (e.g., potlucks) would be allowed. Sought clarity on policies. - Josh Christian – Alameda resident: Praised the course's affordability and accessibility; noted he drives past two other courses to play at Monarch Bay. Hoped evening hours would extend as days shorten. - Thomas Chrysler – President, San Leandro Golf Club (135 members): Reported membership growth from 80 to 135 since AGC contract extension. Praised improvements, hospitality, and increased diversity (juniors, women, people of color). Emphasized the importance of both 9-hole and 18-hole play. - Barbara – Senior golfer: Thanked staff for accommodating seniors and women's groups; noted new members joining. Compared pricing favorably to other courses. - Unnamed male speaker – Member: Highlighted superior driving range conditions and increased tournament participation from outside clubs. Credited staff and the players club for improvements. Discussion Items - Recreation and Parks Director presented an update: Record revenue of $6.3 million (up 13% from prior year), 121,000 rounds played, net revenue of $1.6 million (all expenses covered), and zero general fund subsidy. The city owns the property; American Golf Corp operates under a fee-for-service agreement through 2029. Four focus areas: - Golf Experience: Renovated all 18 tee boxes (first time in 25 years), rebuilt bunkers, installed drainage, replaced recycling water pump, added ground crew, new equipment on rolling cycle. - Clubhouse & Hospitality: Wall removed to open building to Marina Park; siding replaced (unchanged for 35 years); new executive chef (featured on "Dinner, Drivers, and Dash"); updated menu; new POS and CRM systems; banquet services resumed; interior remodel and outdoor patio planned. - Driving Range & Amenities: 100,000 annual visitors; generated $1.46 million revenue last fiscal year ($1.1M from players club). Food and beverage trailer in final design phase with county permitting underway. - Community & Destination: Hosted 250th celebration (80% of attendees were San Leandro residents who did not know they could access the venue); junior tournaments, mixers, seasonal programming; social media growth from 400 to 11,000 followers; collaborations with influencers. - Next 12 months: Open clubhouse to park, complete patio/interior design, bring food/drinks to range, finish renovation cycle (tees, bunkers, pump), and present a 10-year capital plan to the committee. - Committee members posed questions: - Water usage: 90% recycled water; greens use potable water (regulatory requirement). - Players club monthly fee: $55/month (includes daily medium bucket and discounts). - Food delivery logistics: App ordering with notification and pickup; on-course delivery via cart with snacks and beverages. - Net revenue classification: Clarified as net operating revenue (does not account for depreciation or capital reserves). - 10-year capital plan: Will include lifecycle replacement and be developed with Public Works. - Coordination with local businesses: Working with Marina Inn on packages; exploring naming rights and sponsorships. - City Manager noted that event pricing and outside food policies are still under consideration. - Committee member comments: - Councilmember Boldt emphasized that the $1.6 million net revenue is not surplus; capital needs must be explicitly identified and funded. Stressed the importance of transparent capital planning. - Mayor González praised the transformation and the removal of the wall, but stressed balancing revenue generation with resident access. Expressed concern that a city-funded National Golf Foundation study had not been formally presented to the committee and requested that it be scheduled. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or decisions taken; this was an informational item. - Staff to return to the committee with a 10-year capital expenditure plan developed in coordination with Public Works. - Committee members directed staff to ensure that capital reserves are explicitly identified and not treated as surplus for other city uses. - Mayor González noted the need for a future presentation on the National Golf Foundation study results. - The committee intends to institutionalize regular updates on major facilities and transportation projects.

Note: The agenda and transcript indicate this meeting occurred on Wednesday, September 23, 2026, but the user-specified date is September 24, 2026. This summary uses the provided date. The Rules Committee met to discuss a proposal to add facilitated discussion mechanisms to the City Council Handbook as a tool for resolving disagreements among council members before they escalate. The only agenda item was a discussion led by Assistant City Manager Michael Ewan, with a proposed framework from Councilmember Simon. No public comments were received. Discussion Items Item 2a – Discussion to Consider Facilitated Discussion Mechanisms to Help Resolve Disagreements for the City Council Assistant City Manager Michael Ewan introduced the item, noting it had been before the committee previously and was referred back from the full council on September 8, 2026, with authority to explore early conflict resolution tools and propose handbook updates. Councilmember Simon presented a written framework (an amendment to the agenda included a handout as Attachment B). The discussion focused on refining the process. Mayor and Councilmember Simon agreed on adding two preliminary steps before resorting to a third-party mediator: - Step 1: Direct dialogue between the involved council members (or documentation if they are unwilling). - Step 2: Facilitated discussion with the Mayor (or Vice Mayor or most senior council member if the Mayor is involved). The Mayor emphasized that documentation should record only the fact of the meeting (date, time, place) and not the content, to encourage open discussion. The City Attorney noted legal considerations: if four or more council members participate, the meeting must be publicly noticed under the Brown Act; and if a disagreement involves allegations of illegal conduct, it should bypass this process and be handled by the full council with legal advice. Councilmember Simon expressed concern that excluding the accused and accuser from early discussions could escalate smaller issues, but the City Attorney explained the need to protect legal rights. After discussion, the committee agreed on the following principles: - The purpose is to resolve decorum and relationship issues before they become accusations of illegal acts. - Allegations of illegal acts (e.g., violations of law) automatically bypass the facilitated process and go to the full council. - The handbook should put council members on notice that such allegations are handled differently. - The mayor suggested adding a provision that legal counsel could be present during steps 1 and 2 if desired. Key Outcomes Committee Direction to Staff: - Prepare an expanded draft of the council handbook section incorporating a multi-step framework: 1. Direct discussion between council members (document whether meeting occurred or was refused). 2. Facilitated discussion with the chair (Mayor) or vice chair, or next most senior member (same documentation rule). 3. Third-party facilitator (as in original proposal). 4. Documentation is limited to the fact of the meeting, not its content. 5. If four or more council members are involved in a step, the meeting must be publicly noticed. 6. Clarify that allegations of illegal acts bypass steps 1–3 and are referred to the full council with legal counsel. - The new draft to be brought back to the Rules Committee for further consideration. Additional Comments: - Councilmember Simon reiterated interest in revisiting the discipline policy at a later date, stating it is not fair and equitable in its current form. - No votes were taken; the committee reached consensus on the direction. The meeting adjourned at 9:46 AM.

The San Leandro Community Police Review Board (CPRB) convened on September 24, 2026, at 6:00 PM. The meeting included police department and independent police auditor reports, a training on Fourth Amendment policing, and substantive debate over the board's access to expert testimony. The board voted to form an ad hoc committee to further review the San Leandro Police Department's use of Flock safety (ALPR) services. Consent Calendar - Minutes of July 15, 2026: Approved by a vote of 5-0-1 (one board member abstained; one member was absent). Police Department Report - Assistant Chief Torres reported that the department sent its response to the crowd control subcommittee, plans to increase crowd control training to twice a year, and will submit updated use of force and pursuit policies. - FLOCK/NICRIC Data Sharing Clarification: Assistant Chief Torres explained that while SLPD removed NICRIC's direct sharing relationship, an IPA audit revealed that NICRIC could still query San Leandro detections through a separate “California State Lookup” feature. No misuse of queries was identified. Torres stated the department does not intend to disable participation in the state lookup, as it provides reciprocal investigative value. - Pursuit Update: SLPD provided an armored rescue vehicle at the request of the sheriff’s office for an incident on I-580 but was not involved in the pursuit itself. Independent Police Auditor (IPA) Report - Jeff Schlinger presented IPA monthly reports for July and August 2026. - July Statistics: 8 use of force incidents (down 20% from June); 3 vehicle pursuits; 4 complaints. The median case review turnaround was 3.5 days, but the average referral time from SLPD was approximately 40 days. One corrective action was recommended involving supervisory review of a use of force. - August Statistics: 11 use of force incidents (up 38% from July); 2 pursuits; 2 complaints (down 50%); 301 RIPA data collection forms completed (up 45% from July). - Flock Audit Discussion: In response to board members' requests, the IPA agreed to include a section for Flock-related “lowlights” or expressly state if none exist, and to add a direct link to the SLPD transparency portal in future reports. Board members also requested clarification on whether Flock success metrics were double-counted. Presentation: Policing and the 4th Amendment - Jeff Schlinger delivered a training on the constitutional ladder of police encounters: consensual encounters, Terry stops, pat-down frisks, arrests, and searches. He emphasized that each rung requires its own distinct justification, and that common failures stem from failure to articulate specific facts rather than relying on generalities like “officer safety” or “high crime area.” Public Comments - Mike Katzakabe expressed strong opposition to the City’s legal position barring advocacy-group presentations, and argued the IPA’s Flock reporting was partial. He stated that media reports indicate Flock cameras can detect people and track movement, contradicting claims on the transparency portal. He questioned the security of keeping the California State Lookup enabled. - Douglas Spaulding stated that Flock has “lost our confidence” and questioned why the board is not actively seeking alternatives to Flock. He also expressed concern about the prolonged absence of Chief Avery. Discussion Items - Request for EFF Presentation / ALPR Ad Hoc Committee: The board debated the City Attorney’s memo barring presentations by “advocacy groups.” Chair Bailey read a prepared statement strongly opposing the restriction as “overkill” and “unreasonably restrictive.” Board member Tim read an email from EFF attorney Sarah Hamid objecting to the City’s legal reasoning. A motion was made to create an ad hoc committee to further review SLPD’s use of Flock services, with the understanding it can obtain information from groups like the EFF. - Formation of Administrative Procedures Ad Hoc Committee: The board initiated a review of its administrative procedures to account for recent ordinance changes and accumulated operational experience. Key Outcomes - Votes: - Minutes approved (5-0-1). - Motion to form the ALPR/Flock ad hoc committee passed (6-0). - Brown Act emergency procedures item continued to the next meeting (unanimous). - Directives: - IPA to restructure Flock audit reports to include lowlights or an explicit “none.” - IPA to include a direct link to the SLPD transparency portal in future reports. - Appointments: - ALPR/Flock Ad Hoc Committee: Board members Jenny, David Jackson, and Joseph (Chair Bailey also volunteered). - Administrative Procedures Ad Hoc Committee: Board members Saida and Chair Bailey (pending availability of Keith). - Next Steps: - The ALPR ad hoc committee will begin gathering information, potentially including a presentation from the EFF. - The Brown Act emergency agenda item will be taken up at the October meeting. - The board will consider a motion to authorize the Chair to vote at the NACO conference at the next meeting.

Note on date: The provided meeting date (2026-09-22T15:00:00+00:00) does not match the actual meeting date of September 21, 2026 as recorded in the minutes and transcript. The summary below reflects the actual proceedings on September 21, 2026. The San Leandro City Council met on Monday, September 21, 2026 at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers. The meeting included the appointment of Youth Advisory Commissioners, approval of the Consent Calendar, a presentation and discussion of the Lewelling Interim Housing & Drop-In Center Annual Report, and approval of an amendment to the City Manager’s employment agreement. Public comments addressed feral cat colonies, parking citation issues, state propositions, and other community concerns. Consent Calendar - 26-376: Resolution to approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a second amendment to the contract with Robberson Schroedter LLP for bankruptcy litigation related to the Shoreline Project, with a not-to-exceed amount of $575,000 for FY2027 (Enactment No: Reso 2026-121). - 26-359: Resolution to authorize an increase in the cumulative change order limit from 25% to 35% (from $291,338 to $407,874) for Sanitary Sewer Point Repairs 2024-25 and Floresta Blvd Sanitary Sewer Replacement (Reso 2026-122). - 25-505: Resolution to approve a consulting services agreement with Lee & Ro, Inc. for $143,902 for bidding and construction support services for Davis Street Manhole Replacement (Reso 2026-123). - 26-381: Resolution to approve a real property agreement with owners of 675 Haas Avenue for property rights required for the Cary-Haas Bridge Replacement (Reso 2026-124). - 26-364: Resolution to approve Amendment No. 1 to an NPSA with Newton Construction & Management for Golf Course Clubhouse Exterior Improvements, totaling $699,189 (Reso 2026-125). - 26-373: Resolution to accept and appropriate $57,500 in Alameda County Area Agency on Aging Family Caregiver Support Programs grant funding for FY2026-2027, with future renewals up to $432,500 (Reso 2026-126). - 26-374: Resolution to accept and appropriate $40,000 in Alameda County Area Agency on Aging Senior Center Activities Services grant funding for FY2026-2027, with future renewals up to $170,000 (Reso 2026-127). - 26-387: Motion to accept the 2026 Biennial Notice: Conflict of Interest Code Update (Min Order 2026-028). - 26-395: Minutes from the September 8, 2026 City Council Meeting – approved as submitted. Public Comments & Testimony - Douglas Spaulding (online): Commented on the Consent Calendar, expressing concern over $575,000 in litigation costs for the Shoreline Project bankruptcy, and questioned the lack of objections to spending. He also mentioned the importance of sewer and bridge projects but wondered if any items had been pulled for discussion. - Leslie Watson (in-person, Floresta Gardens resident): Described a severe feral cat colony affecting at least 15 households, with an estimated 35 cats. She stated that Animal Control cannot help due to lack of city code, and she has exhausted other options including contacting Alameda County Vector Control. She urged the Council to create enforcement codes to address the health hazard. - Judy Richards (in-person): Requested dismissal of a $696 parking citation, citing a systems error where the first notice received was a delinquent notice months after the citation. She expressed difficulty in contacting the third-party processing center and obtaining photo proof. - Alvaro Ramos (online): Urged voters to reject five state propositions on the November ballot: Prop 39 (voter suppression), Prop 45 (deregulates CEQA), Prop 43 (restricts local taxes), Prop 42 and Prop 41 (both related to billionaire tax). - Gloria Strom (online): Thanked Councilmember Bowen for her work and expressed appreciation for her leadership. - Douglas Spaulding (online, second comment): Promoted an e-bike test ride event organized by Bike East Bay and Ava Community Energy on October 11, 2026. Also discussed the Turlock irrigation district’s solar-covered canal as a model for San Leandro’s Estabrook Canal, and echoed concerns about parking citation due process. - Public Comments on Presentation (9a): Ginny Madsen (in-person) expressed worry about the impending wet winter and lack of shelter for unsheltered individuals, referencing the 58 people still unsheltered. She praised the Nimitz (Lewelling) site but noted the two-year homelessness requirement for assistance. Alvaro Ramos (online) commented on barriers unhoused people face in voting and the importance of making voting accessible. Douglas Spaulding (online) congratulated Deputy City Manager Lobadon, questioned the reorganization of human services, praised the navigation center as a model program, and urged planning for a successor site by 2030. - Public Comments on Action Item 10b (City Manager contract): Mike Katz-Lakabe (in-person) congratulated City Manager Cameron but criticized the agenda packet for lacking the fiscal impact details of the contract extension, calling for transparency. Douglas Spaulding (online) supported the extension, noting the rarity of a great city manager and the importance of stability, while also requesting clearer salary information. Chris Urban (online, identified as Res Life Longory) acknowledged the Ohlone people and congratulated the City Manager. Discussion Items - Lewelling Interim Housing & Drop-In Center Annual Report (Item 9a): Deputy City Manager Jessica Lobadon (presented by City Manager Cameron and staff) provided an overview of the program, which began in 2019 with a focus on addressing homelessness. Key statistics: The interim housing serves 29 rooms; 66 individuals (61 households) were served, with 82% entering as chronically homeless; 74% had been homeless for 2+ years; average stay was 186 days (6 months); 23 people exited to permanent housing (64% of exits to permanent housing). The drop-in center served 669 unique individuals (666 households), with 70% chronically homeless. Notable achievements included 14 drop-in clients moving into permanent housing. Councilmembers praised the program and asked questions about challenges (community engagement, neighbor relations), the process for getting a room (coordinated entry system with county waitlist of 300), length of stay, mental health services, workforce development, and racial/ethnic disparities (higher representation of Black/African American clients, lower Hispanic/Latino representation). Discussion also covered the transition to permanent housing by 2030, the need for a successor navigation center, and safety concerns near the 880 freeway undercrossing (walkability, bird feces). Councilmember Simon requested improved safety and aesthetics near the site. - Amendment to City Manager’s Employment Agreement (Item 10b): HR Director Emily Hung presented a resolution to extend City Manager Janelle Cameron’s contract through June 30, 2030, with no other changes besides continuation of the cost of living adjustment. Councilmembers expressed support, praising Cameron’s leadership and stability. The item was approved unanimously. - Councilmember Requests (Item 11): Councilmember Bowen submitted a referral to update city code regarding feral cat colonies, exploring approaches used by other cities (e.g., San Mateo) to address health, safety, and nuisance concerns through responsible feeding, colony registration, spay/neuter, and enforcement coordination. Key Outcomes - Youth Advisory Commission Appointments: Motion to nominate and appoint members for terms ending August 31, 2027, carried 7-0 (Min Order 2026-027). One original nominee (Tori Chu) declined; Aliah Ansari was appointed in her place. - Consent Calendar: Approved unanimously (7-0). - City Manager Contract Amendment: Resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to the City Manager’s Employment Agreement, extending the term to June 30, 2030, carried 7-0 (Reso 2026-128). No change in base salary; only continuation of cost of living adjustments. - Referral on Feral Cat Colonies: Councilmember Bowen’s referral to update city code was accepted and will be scheduled for a future agenda. - Closed Session: No reportable actions taken. The Council recessed at 8:53 PM and reconvened at 9:17 PM, adjourning at 9:18 PM. Next Steps: The Lewelling Interim Housing & Drop-In Center will continue operations; staff will explore successor location and funding. The City Manager’s extension takes effect immediately. The feral cat code update will be developed. Safety improvements near the 880 corridor will be pursued with county and Caltrans partners.