Cultural Heritage Board Meeting Summary - May 18, 2022
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Cultural Heritage Board Meeting Summary - May 18, 2022
The Santa Rosa Cultural Heritage Board met virtually on May 18, 2022, at 4:30 PM to discuss several landmark alteration permits and concept reviews. The meeting was chaired by Brian Meuser, with members Bonnie Boren, Cappie Garrett, Henry Huang, and Maria Praetzellis present; Laura Fennell was absent. Notably, Board Member Huang recused himself from items 8.2 and 8.3 due to proximity to the properties. The board approved one landmark alteration and provided direction on several concept reviews.
Consent Calendar
- No consent items were on the agenda.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Carol Case (property owner at 807 Cherry Street) expressed concerns about the Living Roots project (8.2), including noise from church activities, construction hours, contractor licensing, the five-foot setback and fire access, privacy for her tenants, the health of an oak tree, and whether the steeple would contain bells.
- John DeLillo spoke in support of the Living Roots project, calling it an enhancement and an asset to the community.
- Alison Dykstra and Andrew Schulman (owners at 703 7th Street, Cherry Street Historic District) submitted an email in strong support of the Living Roots application, urging approval and noting the need for restoration.
- Moses Geller (722-726 Cherry Street) spoke in support, citing the long wait (12-14 years) for the burned structure to be restored.
Discussion Items
8.1 Fremont Park - Scope for Future Discussion (844 4th Street)
- Staff Liaison Susie Murray presented a three-step process for considering landmark designation. Chair Meuser explained the process, noting that a board resolution would only be a recommendation to City Council.
- Deputy Director of Parks Jen Santos confirmed that no historical evaluation has started yet and the park project is on hold pending board direction.
- Chair Meuser made a motion to consider landmark designation of Fremont Park or its historically significant elements at a future meeting. Board Member Garrett seconded. Vice Chair Praetzellis raised the need for a full historic evaluation prior to any designation. The motion carried 5-0.
8.2 Public Hearing: Living Roots Fire Rehab and Church Restoration (610 Orchard St) - LMA20-008
- Staff Liaison Susie Murray presented on behalf of Project Planner Monet Sheikhali. The project includes rehabilitating a fire-damaged two-story parsonage and restoring the steeple on the church, with an increase in height.
- Public comments: Carol Case (above) raised concerns; John DeLillo and Moses Geller spoke in support; Alison Dykstra and Andrew Schulman emailed support.
- Applicant representatives, including Architect Micah Andrecich and historic consultant Mark Perry, addressed concerns: no heavy bell planned; digital bell possible; insulation for soundproofing; existing stair and setback encroachment; contractor oversight.
- Board members praised the project. A friendly amendment allowed the applicant to fully enclose the upper railing if desired.
- Vote: Resolution CHB-2022-002 approved 4-0 (Huang recused).
8.3 Public Hearing: Front Yard Landscape and Hardscape (1122 McDonald Ave) - LMA21-018
- Project Planner Kristinae Toomians presented the proposal, which includes brick steps, walkways, a brick skirt, driveway replacement, a fountain, and a new fence.
- The applicant, Dr. Bean, confirmed that some work (brick hardscape) was already done; shutters were added without approval. Staff recommended either approving with conditions to remove shutters or continuing the item.
- Board Member Garrett expressed concerns about unpermitted work and historic guidelines. She voted no. Chair Meuser voted yes, noting the work is already done.
- Vote: Resolution CHB-2022-003 approved 3-1 (Garrett no, Huang recused).
8.4 Williams Residential Garage and ADU - Concept Review (212 Benton St) - LMA22-003
- Presented by Conor McKay (on behalf of Monet Sheikhali). The proposal includes a 400 sq ft garage with ADU above at the front of the property.
- Board comments included: use differentiated siding to distinguish from the historic house, consider a single-story design to better fit the predominantly single-story neighborhood, possibly relocate the structure closer to the existing house to reduce street presence, and ensure architectural details (garage door, windows, roof pitch) complement bungalow style.
- The applicant, Ben Williams, acknowledged the comments and expressed desire to fit in with the neighborhood.
- No formal vote was taken; comments will be provided to the zoning administrator.
8.5 Campbell Roof Replacement - Concept Review (408 Benton St) - LMA22-005
- Staff Liaison Susie Murray presented two options: asphalt shingles or metal standing seam, both with the existing roof pitch.
- Board members unanimously preferred asphalt shingles over metal, noting metal would be out of character for the historic district. They recommended a color similar to the existing tar-and-gravel roof, and advised regarding underlayment and flashing details.
- The applicant, Lacey Campbell, appreciated the guidance and confirmed the roofer said the existing gutters and downspouts could be preserved.
- No formal vote; staff will use the board's direction in processing the permit.
Key Outcomes
- Fremont Park: Motion approved 5-0 to prepare a study session on landmark designation.
- Living Roots (LMA20-008): Resolution CHB-2022-002 approved 4-0 (Huang recused), with a friendly amendment to allow full enclosure of the upper railing.
- McDonald Ave (LMA21-018): Resolution CHB-2022-003 approved 3-1 (Garrett no, Huang recused). Chair Meuser advised the applicant to remove unapproved shutters.
- Williams (LMA22-003): No formal action; comments summarized for zoning administrator.
- Campbell (LMA22-005): No formal action; board recommended asphalt shingles and provided technical advice.
All actions are final unless appealed within 10 calendar days.
Meeting Transcript
Chair Muser, I did want to let you know that all board members that are attending this evening's meeting are on. So we'll be able to start at four thirty. Thank you very much. If we could go ahead and start the main and ask all board members to turn their video on. Okay, it's four thirty. And I'm calling this meeting of the City of Santa Rosa Cultural Heritage Board to order. Santos, if you we could have a roll call. I'm sorry, Miss Montoya. Absolutely. Let the record reflect that all board members are present with the exception of board member fennel. Okay, thank you. Looking at approval of previous minutes, we have none, so we will move on. Item number three public comment. We are now taking public comment for item four non-agenda matters. This is the time when any person may address the board on matters not listed on this agenda, but which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of this committee. Um and then recording secretary, do you have directions for the public? I do, thank you. Um if you'd like to make a public comment on non-agenda items, please raise your hand. And for our call and attendees, please please raise star nine to raise your hand and then star six to unmute. Thank you. And uh we'll give a minute, see if do if we have anybody who would like to make comment to the board. Okay, it looks like we do have one public comment. So let us pull the timer up and then I will give her her time. Okay. Do you have a name for the person? Yes, it will be Carol. Okay, perfect. Carol, you should have a prompt allowing you to unmute. And if you could please start by stating your full name for the record, please. Carol Case. And I I'm I'm new to Zoom, so uh forgive me if I am speaking out of turn because I I wanted to comment on the living roots project. Is this good or no? Yeah, wait we will give you time uh to comment on that. Uh right now it would be four items that are uh not uh on the agenda. Okay, I'm sorry, thank you. Oh, no worries, no worries. We'll look forward to hearing from you at that time. Okay, thank you. Okay, it looks like we have no other hands at this time. Okay, moving on then to board business. Um, I'd like to uh read our statement of purpose. Principal duties of the board include undertaking and updating historic inventories or surveys, recommending designation of landmarks and preservation districts, reviewing proposed alterations of historic buildings and promoting public awareness of preservation issues. Moving to 4.2 uh board member reports. Um, do any of the board members have anything they'd like to report at this time? So if you raise your hand. Okay, seeing no hands raised. We will move on then. Uh 4.3 other items. We have none at this time, so we'll move on to item five, department reports. And I believe um our staff liaison, Miss Murray, um, have a staff report for us.
openpublica.com