Browse by city
Date range
Search help

Search titles, summaries, topics and stored transcripts together. Keywords may match separately; put the whole query in double quotes for a phrase. Matching follows word analysis, so punctuation is not exact. Both dates are included. Documents are not searched.

SHOWING 1–10 ENTRIES
01
NEWOCT 22, 2026 · SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA · PLANNING COMMISSION
Santa Rosa Planning Commission Meeting Summary - October 22, 2026

The Santa Rosa Planning Commission convened on October 22, 2026, at Santa Rosa City Hall. The primary action item was a public hearing regarding the appeal of a Massage Establishment Certificate denial for 88 Spa. Several other agenda items were continued to future meetings. Public Comments & Testimony - Shauna (Public Comment): Stated she was denied service at 88 Spa as a female while a male was accepted shortly after. She expressed strong concerns about the establishment's activities, citing personal experience and health hazards. - Richard Freeman (Appellant's Attorney): Represented business owner Juping Jiang. Argued that the city lacked direct evidence that the owner placed the advertisement on BunnyAgent.com, claiming the website pirated the listing. He strongly objected to the introduction of post-denial evidence from AMP Reviews and other establishments, arguing it violated due process and was procedurally improper. He urged the commission to overturn the denial. Discussion Items - 88 Spa Massage Establishment Certificate Denial Appeal: The commission heard from staff (Daniela Debaca), who presented evidence of an advertisement on an illicit website, a late application, and additional reviews found after the denial. The commission discussed the evidentiary standard. Commissioner Horton expressed reluctance to uphold the denial without direct evidence of the appellant placing the ad, while Commissioner Carter emphasized the establishment's compliance responsibility. Staff maintained that the evidence was sufficient and procedurally valid for an administrative hearing. - Continuances: The commission acknowledged the continuance of the City Hall Development Agreement Draft SEIR (Item 11.1) to November 12, 2026; the Quick Serve Drive-Through Restaurant (Item 11.2) to December 10, 2026; and the Lance Drive Phase 2 Time Extension (Item 11.4) to November 12, 2026. No action was taken on these items. Key Outcomes - Appeal Denied / Certificate Denial Upheld (4-1): Commissioner Sisko moved to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning and Economic Development Director's decision to deny the Massage Establishment Certificate for 88 Spa (1104 College Ave). The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Duggan and passed with Commissioners Carter, Sisko, Duggan, and Chair Weeks voting in favor. Commissioner Horton voted against. Commissioners Pardot and Sanders were absent. As a result, the business is required to immediately cease operations as a massage establishment.

MASSAGE REGULATION 61% · PROCEDURAL 22% · LEGAL AFFAIRS 10% · PLANNING AND ZONING 4%
02
OCT 13, 2026 · SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA · CITY COUNCIL
Public Safety Subcommittee Regular Meeting - October 13, 2026

The Public Safety Subcommittee of the Santa Rosa City Council met on October 13, 2026, at 9:01 AM in City Hall Council Chamber. The meeting covered proposed new ordinances and amendments related to recreational vehicles (RVs), panhandling, vehicle sideshows, and open flames in parks, along with departmental updates from police and fire. The subcommittee recommended all four proposals move to the full City Council for adoption. The meeting adjourned at 10:12 AM. Consent Calendar - Unanimously approved the July 28, 2026 regular meeting minutes as submitted. Public Comments & Testimony - Public Comment (Non-Agenda): A mother of three young children described a traumatic encounter in the Junior College neighborhood where a woman screamed at her and reached into her baby's stroller. She reported that a police officer later advised residents to carry pepper spray or tasers. She called for a city plan to address escalating aggression, better tracking of incidents, and evaluation of public safety impacts when service facilities are approved near schools. The subcommittee noted it could not respond directly due to the Brown Act but offered to have the police chief follow up. Discussion Items - Presentation on Proposed Ordinance and Ordinance Amendments: - RV Ordinance: Staff proposed prohibiting RV parking on residential streets, limiting parking in commercial areas to 7:30 AM–10 PM (except for loading/unloading with a 72-hour exemption and 24-hour emergency repairs), and banning parking within 30 feet of intersections, in parks, public squares, alleyways, and city-owned lots. Over 940 RV-related calls were logged in the past year. Many other California cities have similar ordinances. - Panhandling Ordinance Amendment: Staff proposed adding prohibitions on panhandling in center medians of roadways and at gas stations/fuel pumps. Existing ordinance already covers aggressive panhandling at ATMs, transit stops, building entrances, etc. Over 100 panhandling calls in the past year (underreported), with a noted correlation between panhandling locations and pedestrian-involved collisions. - Sideshow Ordinance Amendment: Proposed removing the prohibition on spectators due to Ninth Circuit case law protecting spectators' First Amendment rights. No major sideshows in Santa Rosa in recent years. - Open Flames in Parks Ordinance: Proposed defining permissible fires in parks (e.g., using fixed facilities, personal barbecues with charcoal/propane) and prohibiting fires during red flag warnings or when the fire chief determines a public safety threat. - Subcommittee Questions and Comments: Councilmembers asked about the RV definition (vehicles designed for human habitation, excluding utility trailers), enforcement reliance on officer discretion, education-first approaches, linking panhandlers to resources (resource pamphlets, co-response teams), and the need to address cruising/loud vehicles. Councilmember McDonald requested further review of panhandling in parking lots (existing ordinance covers private lots). Councilmember Fleming emphasized balancing quality of life with humane treatment and flagged illegal dumping from RVs. All three members supported moving the proposals to the full council. - Police Department Update (Chief Cregan): - Gun Buyback: 583 firearms collected (including 17 assault weapons, 15 ghost guns), funded by $50,000 from the Santa Rosa Police Foundation. No city funds used. - Truck-or-Treat: Scheduled for October 29, 4–8 PM at Sonoma County Fairgrounds, with city department competitions. - E-bike Education and Enforcement: Two community meetings announced (October 15 at Piner High, October 22 at Maria Carillo High) to address e-bike and e-moto safety, especially in Rincon Valley and Coffee Park. - Staffing Crisis: 10 police officer vacancies, 14 unstaffed beats, resulting in slower response times and reduced proactive patrols. Six specialty team positions unfilled. Recruitment efforts include considering lateral hiring bonuses (previously a $25,000 pilot). - Fire Department Update (Chief Westrope): - Facilities: Fire Station 8 (Roseland) weatherproofed, expected June 2027 completion. Fire Station 9 (Southeast) escrow closing October 26–27; temporary facilities being considered. Permanent Fire Station 11 funded via debt service transfer and development fees. - Fleet: All five Type 1 fire engines from FY22 in service; one ladder truck ordered (expected 2028); four more engines ordered. - Rescue Task Force: Since July 2026, Rescue 1 responded to 329 calls and squads to 573 calls. A new Special Operations Captain will build regional partnerships. The program fills a gap (no staffed heavy rescue between San Francisco/Oakland and the state line). Key Outcomes - The subcommittee unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt all four ordinance proposals (RV parking, panhandling amendments, sideshow amendment, and open flames in parks). - Staff will incorporate council feedback (e.g., on officer discretion, resource linkage, and possible environmental amendments for illegal dumping) before presenting to the full council. - The police chief will follow up with the public commenter on specific questions and data requests.

PUBLIC SAFETY 18% · CANNABIS REGULATION 14% · RV PARKING REGULATION 12% · RV PARKING MANAGEMENT 10%
03
OCT 13, 2026 · SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA · CITY COUNCIL
Santa Rosa City Council Meeting - October 13, 2026: Bond Training, Housing Funds, Del Valle Drive-Thru Appeal, and Flock Camera Debate

The Santa Rosa City Council met on October 13, 2026, starting at 3:00 p.m. with a study session on municipal bond issuance and federal securities law responsibilities. The regular session began at 4:00 p.m. and included proclamations, presentations, a consent agenda, public comment on non-agenda matters, and two public hearings. Key actions included approval of an application for up to $3,046,056 in Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funds, and a 6-1 vote (with one abstention) to grant an appeal and approve a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through at Del Valle Mexican Restaurant, reversing the Planning Commission's denial. Several members of the public spoke in opposition to the city's use of Flock cameras, and Councilmember Alvarez moved to agenda a study session on automatic license plate readers before any contract renewal. Consent Calendar - 13.1: Approved Third Amendment to Purchase Order 170609 with PlanetBids, Inc., extending the term one year and adding $24,122 for a total not to exceed $110,303.46. (Unanimous) - 13.2: Adopted Resolution RES-2026-113 authorizing purchase of six 2019 Gillig hybrid transit buses from the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, with a federal interest not exceeding $1,894,566 and appropriation of $381,102 from the Transit Capital Fund. (Unanimous) - 13.3: Adopted Resolution RES-2026-114 authorizing a request for $471,417 in Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funds for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Cycles A and B to support the UR Free youth fare program. (Unanimous) - 13.4: Adopted Resolution RES-2026-115 authorizing application for $1,467,000 in One Bay Area Grant Cycle 4 funding for the Zero-Emission Bus Rollout Plan Implementation: Bus Fleet Resiliency Project, with required nonfederal match from Transit Development Act Article IV funds. (Unanimous) - 13.5: Adopted Resolution RES-2026-116 authorizing applications for Federal Transit Administration Formula and Surface Transportation Program funds for Federal Fiscal Years 2027–2031, committing approximately $12,701,317 in local matching funds. (Unanimous) Public Comments & Testimony - Study Session (4.1): Duane De Witt suggested board and commission members receive similar training on bond disclosure. - Recology Presentation (7.2): Michael Hilber raised concerns about fines for overfilled cans, noting that homeless individuals may add trash without permission. Duane De Witt advocated for textile recycling and praised the reuse bazaar (41,000 pounds diverted in 2026). - Economic Development Update (8.1): Duane De Witt urged the council to look beyond downtown and include Roseland businesses; Michael Hilber criticized the proposed sales tax increase to 10.5%; Fred Allebach urged consideration of a triple bottom line (economy, environment, society). - Community Empowerment Plan (8.2): Duane De Witt promoted the upcoming Make a Difference Day on October 24 and highlighted a new Roseland Rotary Club. - Public Comment on Non-Agenda Matters (14): A dozen speakers—including members of the North Bay Organizing Project—spoke in opposition to Flock cameras, citing privacy violations, civil liberties, and a federal judge's ruling on warrantless location data searches. Speaker Camille noted a community event where a Flock representative evaded a question from a Black and Latina former official, which she called anti-black. Duane De Witt suggested the council place the issue on a future agenda. - Public Hearing 16.2 (Del Valle Drive-Thru): - Opponents: Colleen O'Neal (44-year Kenmore Lane resident) cited lack of sidewalks and safety; Kathy Pooler (47-year resident) argued the studies ignored Kenmore Lane impacts; Scott Robinson noted dangerous U-turns and inadequate street lighting; Howard Leyton described hazardous left turns onto Sebastopol Road; Ken Davis argued the project violates zoning codes (sections 20-52F and 20-20.10) and would dump hundreds of cars onto a narrow residential street; Samantha Chance Colton (owner of three Kenmore Lane properties) stated her disabled veteran father would be directly affected by headlights, noise, and exhaust. - Supporters: Nahom, Ana Diaz, Hector Velasquez, Raul Barragan (President, Roseland Business Association), Jesus Martinez, Alan Martinez, Diana Martinez, Roy Cabrera, Anthony, and an unidentified speaker expressed support for the locally owned family business, citing job creation, tax revenue, and the opportunity for a small business to compete with nearby corporate chains. Roy Cabrera asked the council to find a way to approve the project. Jim Fain (civil engineer) clarified Kenmore Lane would only be used for egress, not ingress. - Final Public Comment (18): Betty Andrews spoke about flood risk from aging downtown culverts, citing FEMA studies; Jacob Gill urged approval of the ALPR study session, quoting a federal judge's opinion against dragnet surveillance; Jason Newman (author of "Deflock the Country") stated the song had over 10,000 streams and asserted community opposition to mass surveillance. Discussion Items - 4.1 Study Session – Municipal Bond Issuance and Disclosure: Scott Wagner (CFO), Chris Lynch (Jones Hall), and Craig Hill (NHA Advisors) presented training on federal securities laws, disclosure obligations, and the city's debt policy. Council Members Fleming, Bañuelos, and MacDonald discussed timing, interest rates (approx. 4% for general obligation), and the city's upgraded Moody's rating. Fleming asked why bonds were not issued sooner; MacDonald queried about capacity for additional debt. The session was informational with no action taken. - 7.1 Proclamation – Domestic Violence Awareness Month: Council Member Bañuelos read the proclamation. Madeline Keegan O'Connell (CEO, YWCA Sonoma County) noted the organization operates the county's only confidential safe house and 24/7 crisis hotline, receiving over 3,000 calls last year; 80% of clients are female, over 50% Hispanic/Latinx, 13% children, 7% seniors. Police Chief John Cregan reported a five-year average of 724 domestic violence incidents per year reported to SRPD. - 7.2 Recology 2026 Update: Andy Fulton (Interim GM) and Celia Furber (Community Relations Manager) presented operational improvements, including a bike lane sweeper and new recycling/compost routes. Furber reported 1,300 accounts worked with, 847 site visits, 2,500 audits, 125 presentations, and a 99% SB 1383 compliance rate. The reuse bazaar in September 2026 collected 41,000 pounds of material with 84% landfill diversion. Their Trash Art program and children's museum exhibit were highlighted. Santa Rosa's landfill tons decreased from 90,000 in 2019 to 81,000 in 2025 (10% reduction). - 8.1 Economic Development Update: Scott Adair (Chief Economic Officer) listed numerous completed initiatives, including gap analyses, broker forums, a new economic dashboard, and a one-stop shop business portal. Dr. Robert Eyler (Sonoma State) presented on national and local economic conditions: national real GDP growth forecast modulated, unemployment near 4-5%, inflation at 3.3% (core PCE) in 2026 with recession probability at 15-20%. Santa Rosa's hotel occupancy was around 62% (12-month moving average through July 2026). Key growth sectors: healthcare, hospitality, construction; agriculture and manufacturing forecasted to fall. Dr. Eyler noted lower to middle income households face persistent pressure from inflation. - 8.2 Community Empowerment Plan Update: Ana Horta (Community Engagement Manager) highlighted upcoming events: October 14 municipal election education meeting, October 15 and 22 e-bike safety meetings, and October 29 trunk-or-treat. - 11.2.1 Council Reports: Council Member Rogers suggested including a Roseland School Board representative on the Violence Prevention Partnership. Council Member Alvarez moved to agenda a study session on automatic license plate readers (ALPR) before any contract renewal, seconded by Council Member Fleming; the motion will be voted on at the next meeting (October 27). Council Member MacDonald requested a future item reviewing the city's farm animal ordinance; staff will review. Council Member Okrepkie reported on community town hall and subcommittee meetings. Mayor Stapp reported on a gun buyback that brought in nearly 600 firearms, a joint city council-school board meeting (first since 2019), and the fifth annual Faith and Blue outreach reaching 5,000 people across 36 congregations. - Appointment to Zero Waste Sonoma: Council voted unanimously to appoint Council Member MacDonald as the primary representative to the Zero Waste Sonoma Agency Board of Directors. Key Outcomes - Consent Items (13.1–13.5): All approved unanimously. - Public Hearing 16.1 – PLHA Funds: Council adopted Resolution RES-2026-117 authorizing submittal of an application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for formula allocations of $487,369 (2024) and $522,044 (2025), as part of a potential five-year allocation of up to $3,046,056, and adopting the 2024–2028 PLHA Plan. The motion carried 7-0. - Public Hearing 16.2 – Del Valle Drive-Thru Appeal: Council adopted Resolution RES-2026-118 granting the appeal, reversing the Planning Commission's denial, and approving a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through at 2000 Sebastopol Road. The vote was 6-1 (Council Member Fleming abstained). The resolution includes condition 10 for operating hours 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and requires a queue management plan that keeps queuing off public streets; the CUP can be revoked if conditions are not met. - Flock Camera Study Session: Councilmember Alvarez's motion to schedule a study session on ALPR will be voted on at the October 27, 2026 meeting. - Farm Animal Ordinance: Council directed staff to review the existing ordinance. - Minutes of September 29, 2026: Approved as submitted, with Council Member Rogers abstaining. - Next Meeting: The next regular meeting is scheduled for October 27, 2026.

PLANNING AND ZONING 15% · PUBLIC COMMENT 12% · ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 11% · TRANSPORTATION SAFETY 9%
04
OCT 8, 2026 · SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA · PLANNING COMMISSION
Santa Rosa Planning Commission Denies Tree Removal Permit for Heritage Redwood on October 8, 2026

The Santa Rosa Planning Commission held a regular meeting on October 8, 2026. The central action was a public hearing and vote on an appeal contesting the director's approval of a tree removal permit for a heritage Coast Redwood at 721 Spring Street, known to supporters as "Rosie the Redwood." The vote on the motion to grant the appeal resulted in a tie (2-2), but the Chair declared the motion passed, overturning the director's decision. An item regarding the Santa Rosa City Hall Development Agreement Draft Supplemental EIR was continued to the October 22, 2026 meeting without public testimony or deliberation. Consent Calendar - Approved the draft minutes from the September 10, 2026 meeting as submitted. Public Comments on Non-Agenda Matters - Dwayne DeWitt (Roseland resident) expressed frustration that the city focuses on expansion while neglecting existing infrastructure. He cited a 15-year delay in building a promised bike path along Roseland Creek, a lack of historical surveys for a nearby 1860s cemetery and Native American sites, and urged the commission to direct city leadership to address issues in underserved areas before approving new growth. Public Hearing: Appeal of Tree Removal Permit – 721 Spring Street (Item 11.2) This item considered an appeal filed by Tom Murphy ("Friends of Rosie the Redwood") challenging the Planning and Economic Development Director's approval of a permit to remove one Coast Redwood, a heritage tree approximately 70 feet tall and 53 inches in diameter. Staff Presentation: Staff recommended denying the appeal and upholding the permit. The property received code enforcement notices since 2021 regarding sidewalk damage from the tree roots. The current owners, Shelby and Andrew Milenez, applied for removal in April 2026, which the director approved in June 2026. Staff argued the applicant's arborist report showed root damage to infrastructure, and cutting roots for a sidewalk repair could destabilize the tree. Staff stated the city code does not require the director to evaluate alternative sidewalk designs, and public opposition is not a standalone criterion for denial. Applicant Presentation (Property Owners): Shelby and Andrew Milenez stated they value trees but inherited a public safety and property damage problem. They argued a proposed sidewalk bulbout does not resolve the driveway damage, proximity to overhead PG&E utility lines (which they said PG&E would not relocate), drainage concerns, or long-term liability given the tree could grow to 120 feet. They requested the commission deny the appeal to allow them to address the hazards responsibly. Appellant Presentation (Tom Murphy / Tree Supporters): Tom Murphy argued the permit was based on a flawed arborist report containing false claims about overhead wires (stating PG&E confirmed no risk) and root damage. He presented photos showing a void under the concrete slab with no roots, arguing the sidewalk was poured too close to the tree. He proposed a simple, low-cost (under $10,000) sidewalk realignment or bulbout. He noted the city had offered to build a bulbout for the previous owner, proving its feasibility. Murphy argued the removal was "unnecessary" under the tree ordinance, which bars unnecessary removal of heritage trees. He reported over 400 petition signatures and over 140 written comments favoring preservation, running 28 to 2 in favor of saving the tree. Public Testimony (Over 25 speakers): - Supporting the Appeal (Preserving the Tree): Robin Van Patten (attorney/neighbor) argued the cement is the problem, not the roots. Pam McLean (neighbor) stated PG&E confirmed no electrical hazard. Ethan Foote (retired CalFire assistant chief) testified the tree posed no significant fire hazard. Numerous other residents and experts (Robert Nygard, Christmas Stewart, Tim Beatley, Rick Coates, Michael Apelda) emphasized the tree's irreplaceable ecological, aesthetic, and historic value. Michael Apelda stated the tree has sequestered approximately 26,000 pounds of carbon. The arborist who wrote the applicant's report clarified that his report did not claim the tree was a vertical hazard to overhead lines. - Opposing the Appeal (Supporting Removal): John Prouty argued the property owners should not bear the cost and liability for a neighborhood amenity and questioned why no appeals were filed for similar removals in the area. Erica Cameron shared a story of being severely injured by a heritage tree limb and urged prioritizing safety. Sarah Wellman defended the property owners against what she called a "smear campaign." Commission Deliberation: Commissioners questioned staff on the process for evaluating alternatives. Deputy Director Cleve Gurney confirmed no engineered design for a bulbout had been submitted, and the code does not require the Director to evaluate alternatives. Commissioners Sisko, Pardo, and Carter stated they could not make the required findings to support the director's decision, citing the tree's health and the insufficient record regarding alternatives. Commissioners Horton and Weeks stated they could make the findings to deny the appeal. Key Outcomes - Motion to Deny Appeal (Uphold Permit): Moved by Commissioner Horton, seconded by Commissioner Pardo. Failed due to lack of majority support. - Motion to Grant Appeal (Deny Permit): Moved by Commissioner Sisko, seconded by Commissioner Pardo. The roll call vote resulted in a tie: Commissioners Sisko and Pardo voted in favor; Commissioners Horton and Weeks voted in opposition; Commissioner Sanders recused; Vice Chair Dugan was absent. Despite the tie vote, Chair Weeks declared the motion passed. This represents a discrepancy in the recorded meeting proceedings. - Result: The appeal was declared upheld by the chair. The Director's approval of the Tree Removal Permit for 721 Spring Street was overturned. The tree will not be removed per this decision. - Next Steps: Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 20-62, the property owners have 10 calendar days from the decision to appeal the Planning Commission's decision to the Santa Rosa City Council.

TREE PRESERVATION 64% · PUBLIC COMMENT 10% · PUBLIC SAFETY 9% · PUBLIC WORKS 9%
05
OCT 7, 2026 · SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA · CITY COUNCIL
Joint Meeting of Santa Rosa City Council and School Board on Youth Safety and Economy - October 7, 2026

The Santa Rosa City Council and the Santa Rosa City Schools Board held their first joint meeting in seven years on October 7, 2026. The meeting convened at 6:03 PM and adjourned at 8:29 PM, focusing on two critical pillars of collaboration: youth safety and the economic impact of education. Mayor Mark Stapp and School Board President Caston co-chaired, with presentations from Superintendent Dr. Monica Thomas, Police Chief John Cregan, economist Dr. Robert Eyler, SRJC President Dr. Angelica Garcia, and SSU President Dr. Michael Spagna. Public Comments & Testimony - Duane Dewitt (Roseland alumni): Called for authentic community engagement and for expanding vocational programs (shop classes, explorer programs) as alternatives to gang involvement. - Priscilla Cordero (via interpreter): Representing English learners and low-income students, she questioned the district's financial priorities and requested more resources for non-duplicated students. - Carlos Gonzalez & Johnnie Balmontes (TRIO Pre-Collegiate Program, SSU): Requested letters of support from the City and School District for their federal TRIO grant, emphasizing the program's four-decade history of helping first-gen and low-income students. - Janice Karrman: Supported widening occupational pathways, noted the burden of student debt, and urged stronger business-school partnerships. - Jen: Criticized the inaccessibility of public comment at SRCS board meetings (no virtual option) and advocated for equal data visibility and support for girls' flag football. Discussion: Youth Safety Update (Item 8.1) - Superintendent Thomas and Chief Cregan highlighted the strong SRCS-SRPD partnership. - Positive Data: Double-digit drops in controlled substances, weapons, and fights on campus. Suspension rates declining. Student perception of safety steadily increasing. No stabbings or loaded firearms on campus reported in 2025/2026 YTD, compared to four of each in 2022-2024. - Police Calls: SRPD responded to 6,000 calls at SRCS since 2022. Calls peaked in 2023 and are trending downward. - Strategies: Behavioral Threat Assessment Teams (BTATs), Violence Prevention Partnership (VPP), expanded use of the Stop It app. - Challenges: Off-campus conflicts spilling into schools, police staffing shortages (14 unfilled patrol beats), and a $14 million city budget shortfall preventing funded School Resource Officers (SROs) despite an approved 2025 MOU. - Council/Board Discussion: Councilmember Rogers asked about suspension disproportionality; Dr. Thomas acknowledged disparities for students of color and unhoused youth. Trustee De La Torre noted the MOU's positive framework. Trustee Medina expressed strong opposition to armed SROs, stating they do not feel safe for marginalized students. Trustee Caston proposed a youth involvement opportunities database. - Outcome: Item received and filed. The Mayor and Board President announced the reappointment of a school board member to the VPP. Discussion: Education's Role in Santa Rosa's Economy (Item 8.2) - Economic Context (Dr. Eyler): Schools act as critical infrastructure for economic development. Santa Rosa City Schools represents about 20% of the county's K-12 workforce, generating a 1.2x economic multiplier. He projected significant enrollment declines due to demographic shifts, creating major workforce headwinds. - Santa Rosa Junior College (Dr. Garcia): SRJC serves 33,000 students (43% Latino, 80% part-time). Its CCAP program providing free college credit to high schoolers grew from 275 to 1,000 students. She highlighted that impacted programs (nursing, dental hygiene) are constrained by facility space. - Sonoma State University (Dr. Spagna): SSU placed 71 teachers in SRCS since 2018. He proposed a "Santa Rosa Compact" to create a seamless K-12 to career pipeline. Stressed paid internships, career readiness, and the Seawolf Promise program. - Council/Board Discussion: Trustee Kirby confirmed CCAP is free and discussed program expansion. Trustee Medina asked about SB 1255 (HSI designation), which Dr. Garcia noted is currently unfunded. Councilmember Alvarez asked about education efficiency in the face of AI and technology. Trustee Du Fosee advocated for neurodivergent students. Trustee De La Torre raised the challenge of graduates finding local college-level jobs. - Outcome: Item received and filed. Strong support was expressed for developing the Santa Rosa Compact. Key Outcomes - Joint Meetings Restarted: The boards committed to making these joint meetings a regular occurrence. - VPP Appointment: A school board member will be appointed to the Violence Prevention Partnership. - Santa Rosa Compact: The City, School District, SRJC, SSU, and Chamber will explore a formal compact to align education with workforce needs. - Youth Safety Direction: Staff was directed to continue strengthening the SRPD-SRCS partnership and pursue funding for SROs and a youth opportunity database. - Economic Partnership Direction: Staff was directed to deepen ties with higher education to bolster the local talent pipeline and address workforce job placement.

EDUCATION 33% · PUBLIC SAFETY 20% · YOUTH PROGRAMS 14% · WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT 10%
06
SEP 29, 2026 · SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA · CITY COUNCIL
Santa Rosa City Council Regular Meeting - September 29, 2026

The Santa Rosa City Council met on Tuesday, September 29, 2026, beginning at 2:30 p.m. with a closed session, followed by a study session at 3:30 p.m., and the regular session at 4:00 p.m. Councilmembers Stapp, Okrepkie, Alvarez, and Bañuelos were present for most of the meeting. Councilmember Fleming participated remotely for the study session but was absent for the regular session. Councilmembers MacDonald and Rogers were absent. The meeting covered downtown improvement projects, a public hearing for tax-exempt bond financing for senior housing, and featured extensive public testimony urging amendments to the city’s sanctuary ordinance regarding non-cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Consent Calendar - Parking Agreement (13.1): Approved a Parking Agreement with 425 Humboldt, LLC, allowing the purchase of up to 176 non-reserved residential parking permits in Garage 3 for the 425 Humboldt Street Apartment Project. Council discussed balancing permit parking with public parking demand to maintain an approximately 85% garage utilization target for commercial vibrancy. - Homeless Emergency Extension (13.2): Approved Resolution RES-2026-111, extending the local proclamation of a homeless emergency. - Classification and Compensation (13.3): Adopted Resolution RES-2026-112, approving classification and compensation changes and the updated Salary Plan and Schedule. Public Participation and Council Reports Councilmember Reports - Councilmember Alvarez requested a future agenda item to receive an update on the city’s immigration policy and community protocols, which sparked extensive public testimony. - Councilmember Bañuelos reported on the Homeless Coalition, noting challenges with federal grants, an increase in medically vulnerable and senior homelessness, and a lack of shelter beds heading into winter. She stressed the need for permanent supportive housing. - Mayor Stapp reported on the Flock camera community meeting and appointed Councilmember MacDonald to the Public Safety Subcommittee. Public Testimony on Immigration Policy (Sanctuary Ordinance) - Over twenty members of the public, many representing the Sonoma County Sanctuary Coalition and the North Bay Organizing Project, urged the City Council to amend the existing ordinance that prohibits ICE use of city property. They requested five specific amendments: 1) an explicit non-collaboration policy; 2) robust protocols for city employees to not collaborate with ICE; 3) mandatory employee training; 4) citywide signage regarding the non-collaboration policy; and 5) requiring city contractors to comply with the same standards. - Speakers expressed fear, urgency, and frustration with the pace of the city’s actions. Several speakers cited Petaluma’s recent ordinance approval as a model of effective community engagement. - City response: Mayor Stapp stated that much of what was requested is already in place in existing city ordinances. City Manager Nutt confirmed that staff are actively working on updating ordinance language and developing a staff training program, and will provide a detailed update to the Council at a future meeting. Councilmember Alvarez affirmed the need to address the community’s concerns. Other Public Comments - Duane De Witt spoke on the Downtown Improvement Plan, advocating for the use of “must and shall” language to ensure commitment to projects, and on the homeless emergency, urging the preservation of existing housing stock. - Mark Buchow criticized the Flock camera town hall, stating police leadership did not provide measurable goals and relied on a “trust me” message which he found insufficient. - Will Abrams (Utility Wildfire Survivor Coalition) urged the City to support AB 2700 to ensure full restitution for wildfire survivors. - Abigail Zoger (North Bay Transit Riders) asked councilmembers to participate in the National Week Without Driving campaign. - Ken Davis alerted the Council to an upcoming appeal of a drive-thru project near his neighborhood, asking the Council to uphold the Planning Commission’s prior denial. Discussion Items (Study Session) - Downtown Improvements Update (Item 4.1): Directors Dan Hennessey (Transportation & Public Works) and Gabe Osburn (Planning & Economic Development) presented updates on several downtown projects. Topics included the Ruth Asawa bronze panel installation in Courthouse Square, new interactive play elements, 4th Street lighting and bike rack standardization, Comstock Mall enhancements, plans to restore the Jeju Way fountain and improve sightlines, and new playground equipment at Julliard Park. The Council discussed the potential activation of a kiosk at Julliard Park for commercial use and the challenges of placing a larger play structure in Courthouse Square. Councilmembers expressed strong support for the beautification efforts. No action was taken. Public Hearing - TEFRA Bond Reissuance for Vigil Light Senior Apartments (Item 16.1): The Council held a public hearing and unanimously adopted Resolution RES-2026-110 authorizing the California Municipal Finance Authority to reissue tax-exempt revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $20 million. The bonds will finance the acquisition, rehabilitation, development, and equipping of Vigil Light Senior Apartments, a 49-unit affordable senior housing development located at 1945 Long Drive. No public comments were made, and the City confirmed there is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. Key Outcomes - Resolution RES-2026-110: Adopted 4-0 approving the reissuance of tax-exempt revenue bonds for the Vigil Light Senior Apartments. - Resolution RES-2026-111: Adopted extending the Local Homeless Emergency Proclamation. - Resolution RES-2026-112: Adopted approving updated Classification and Compensation Salary Plans. - Parking Agreement: Approved for the 425 Humboldt Street Apartment Project. - Meeting Minutes: The September 15, 2026 meeting minutes were approved as submitted. - Future Agenda Direction: Staff will return to the Council with a detailed update on the city’s immigration policy, employee protocols, and training. - Closed Session: No reportable action was taken regarding the real property negotiation for properties at 625 and 637 3rd Street (Garage 5).

IMMIGRATION POLICY 26% · PROCEDURAL 19% · DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION 9% · PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 9%
07
SEP 15, 2026 · SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA · CITY COUNCIL
Santa Rosa City Council Meeting - September 15, 2026

The City Council of Santa Rosa convened at 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, in Council Chamber at 100 Santa Rosa Avenue. Mayor Mark Stapp presided. Six members were present (Mayor Stapp, Council Members Alvarez, Bañuelos, Fleming, MacDonald, Rogers); Vice Mayor Jeff Okrepkie was absent. Council Member MacDonald participated via teleconference from Maui, Hawaii. The meeting adjourned at 5:19 p.m. The agenda included proclamations, staff briefings, reports, consent items, and public comment on non-agenda matters. Proclamations & Presentations - National Transit Month (September 2026) – Council Member Fleming read the proclamation and presented it to Rachel Eid (Deputy Director Transit) and Luis Rivera (City Bus operator). Public comments from Peter Edwards (MV Transportation) and a speaker named Steven praised transit services and connectivity with Sonoma-Marin Area Rapid Transit. - Creek Week 2026 (September 19–25) – Council Member Rogers read the proclamation. Michael Santarini (Environmental Specialist I) highlighted events including a tour of culverts beneath City Hall and a bilingual birding event. No public comments. Staff Briefings - Community Empowerment Plan Update (Item 8.1) – Ana Horta (Community Engagement Manager) presented upcoming events: Firefighter Story Hour (Sept. 19), Measure L and election info session (Sept. 27), District 5&6 community meeting (Oct. 1), gun buyback event (Oct. 3), boards/commissions recruitment workshop (Oct. 6), Pumpkins in the Parks scavenger hunt (Oct. 1–30), and Faith & Blue event (Oct. 11). Council received and filed the update; no public comments. City Manager’s & City Attorney’s Reports City Manager Jason Nutt reported: - Sept. 17 community meeting on Flock automated license plate readers (ALPR) hosted by Santa Rosa Police Department. - City awarded 2026 Bike Infrastructure Project of the Year by Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition for the Highway 101 / Hearn Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing. - 44th Annual Merit Awards Ceremony on Sept. 21 at Finley Community Center. - Bennett Valley Golf Course named best in Sonoma County by Press Democrat Readers’ Choice Awards. City Attorney Ashle Crocker had no report. Public comments during City Manager/Attorney reports: - Cynthia spoke in opposition to Flock cameras, asking if visual representation would be provided at the Thursday meeting; City Manager Nutt confirmed images would be shown. - Jennie Gilpin (North Bay Organizing Project) spoke in opposition to Flock cameras, citing privacy concerns and citing that Boston had canceled its Flock contract. She urged the Council to cancel the contract. Mayor’s & Council Members’ Reports Council members provided brief reports on subcommittee liaisons, district meetings, and community events. Council Member Rogers highlighted that SCTCA awarded $25 million in grant awards, including five Santa Rosa projects. She also shared heroic acts by Parks Maintenance employees Jared Gardner, Edward Wandre, and Moses Jacinto Ramirez in saving lives; they were commended. Council Member Alvarez reported on RUP/RCP high school integration. Council Member MacDonald thanked a park board representative and noted pickleball courts opened at Howard Park. Council Member Bañuelos announced a Violence Prevention Policy Team meeting. Mayor Stapp reported on state legislative fixes for goat herder wages, the Santa Rosa Marathon, former mayors luncheon, district town halls, the city being named most business friendly in Sonoma County (second consecutive year), Russian River Watershed consolidation efforts, and several ribbon cuttings. He also noted a prayer vigil for Nepal and Vince Harper Day. Public comment on council reports: Michael Hilber urged council members to tour the area around Sam Jones Hall, citing vagrancy, trash, and fires in the ditch. Approval of Minutes - August 18, 2026 Special Meeting Minutes – Approved as submitted. - August 18, 2026 Regular Meeting Minutes – Approved as submitted. Consent Calendar (Items 13.1–13.10) All consent items were approved by a 6-0 vote (Vice Mayor Okrepkie absent). The following actions were taken: - 13.1 – Approved First Amendment with Best Best & Krieger LLP for legal representation, increasing compensation by $400,000 to a total not to exceed $500,000. - 13.2 – Approved General Services Agreement with Air Applied Mulch LLC for engineered wood fiber mulch, total not to exceed $600,000 over potential five-year term. - 13.3 – Approved Fifth Amendment with CalMat Co. (Vulcan Materials), increasing compensation by $150,000 for total $729,615.45. - 13.4 – Approved First Amendment to Zero Waste Sonoma JPA, clarifying authority to accept loans from member agencies. - 13.5 – Adopted Resolution RES-2026-103 for purchase of four replacement paratransit cutaway vehicles from Model1 Commercial Vehicles Inc. for $744,450. - 13.6 – Adopted Resolution RES-2026-104 appropriating $2,683,593 from State Water Resources Control Board expedited drinking water grant for Park Royal Water Consolidation Project. - 13.7 – Adopted three resolutions (RES-2026-105, 106, 107) authorizing Clean Water State Revolving Fund and Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act loan applications for Fulton Road Sewer Lift Station Relocation Project. - 13.8 – Adopted Resolution RES-2026-108 approving Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement of Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Sustainability Agency. - 13.9 – Adopted Resolution RES-2026-109 acknowledging receipt of Fire Department’s SB 1205 annual inspection report for calendar year 2025. - 13.10 – Adopted on second reading Ordinance ORD-2026-014 amending Water Waste Regulations (Chapter 14-21) to prohibit irrigation of nonfunctional turf with potable water, with compliance deadlines and enforcement provisions. Originally introduced on August 18, 2026 (passed 7-0). Public comment on consent items: Michael Hilber spoke in opposition to Item 13.8 (Groundwater Sustainability Agency JPA), arguing it would impose fees on well users and was wasteful. Public Comments on Non-Agenda Matters (Items 14 & 18) More than ten speakers addressed the Council between 5:00 p.m. and 5:19 p.m. Key positions: - Flock cameras / surveillance: Multiple speakers (including Ronnie, Jason Newman, June Brashares, Bruce Dabanian, Stephanie, and others not present) opposed the Flock ALPR system, citing privacy violations, Fourth Amendment concerns, discrepancies in audit logs, and lack of transparency. They urged the Council to cancel the contract. - Housing equity: Cynthia Birdy Frease (SafeCannabis 707) requested policy changes to allow renters to consume medicinal cannabis, noting current code poses equity gaps and could generate revenue. - Downtown parking: A business owner (Ken) requested free parking to support downtown businesses. - Cannery affordable housing: Michael Hilber described the building as a “drug den” after a narcotics bust and called for action. Written Communications - Legislative update included support letters for SB 692 (vehicles: homelessness) and AB 2296 (housing element). Received and filed. - Notice of Final Map – Meadowood Ranch. Received and filed. Key Outcomes - Consent items (13.1–13.10) approved 6-0 (motion by Alvarez, second by Rogers). - Minutes approved as submitted. - Proclamations presented and received. - No report items or public hearings. - Meeting adjourned at 5:19 p.m.; next regular meeting tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, September 29, 2026.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 16% · PUBLIC COMMENT 15% · PUBLIC SAFETY 15% · PROCEDURAL 14%
08
SEP 10, 2026 · SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA · PLANNING COMMISSION
Santa Rosa Planning Commission Meeting - September 10, 2026

Chair Karen Weeks called the meeting to order at 4:32 p.m. All seven commissioners were present. The meeting included approval of minutes, two public hearings, and unanimous decisions on both agenda items. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The draft minutes from August 13, 2026, were approved as submitted without changes. Public Comments & Testimony - Non-agenda items: No public comments were made. - Highway 12 Massage Appeal: The appellant's representative, attorney Richard Freeman, argued that business owner Weihong Hu did not control or know about illicit advertisements placed by a third-party marketer, and that she took over operations only in September 2025, not earlier. Staff maintained that Hu was responsible for the actions of her hired marketer and that the business had been linked to the property since 2023. - Emerald Isle CCRC: Three members of the public spoke: - Mike Lopez expressed support, stating the project addresses a critical need for senior housing and should not be blocked by NIMBYism. - Brian Minoin opposed, citing evacuation concerns from the 2017 Tubbs fire and questioning whether cumulative traffic and density increases in the Fountain Grove area had been fully assessed. - Dianna Segall opposed, raising concerns about parking adequacy, emergency access roads crossing the golf course, and the need for a detailed evacuation plan rather than general descriptions. - Gary Sol expressed concern about evacuation safety, noting traffic congestion on Thomas Lake Harris Drive and the risk of being trapped. Discussion Items 11.1 - Highway 12 Massage Establishment Certificate Denial Appeal - Staff presented evidence that illicit advertisements for the business appeared on websites such as Adultlook.com and Skipthegames.com between 2024 and 2026. The denial was based on gross violations of the city's Massage Ordinance (Section 20-62). - The appellant (Weihong Hu, owner of Hongyuan LLC and co-owner of the property with husband Louis Lacaban) argued she did not place the ads and only assumed operation in September 2025. She stated she hired a third-party marketer without knowledge of the websites used. - Commissioners asked clarifying questions about the timeline of ownership, the definition of "cause to occur" in the ordinance, and the consequences of denial (immediate closure, two-year property restriction, permanent prohibition on Hu operating in Santa Rosa). - No public comments were made during the hearing. - After deliberation, all commissioners agreed that the evidence supported staff's findings and that ignorance or lack of intent was not a valid defense. 11.2 - Emerald Isle Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) at 2021 Gullane Drive and 0 Thomas Lake Harris Drive - Staff and applicant (Gallher Companies) presented a proposed 82-unit CCRC on a 12.57-acre hillside site. The project includes a three-story main building (63 independent living units, underground parking), 18 single-story casitas, and a single-story assisted living/memory care building (9 beds). - Key features: 47.75-foot main building height, 258 parking spaces, two emergency access routes (primary on Gullane Drive, secondary apparatus road to Thomas Lake Harris Drive), and an emergency preparedness and evacuation plan coordinated with Santa Rosa Fire Department. - The project requires a CEQA Addendum to the 2019 Mitigated Negative Declaration, a Minor Use Permit (for the CCRC use and building height), and a Major Hillside Development Permit (due to slopes averaging 21.81%). A separate Major Design Review will be handled by the Design Review and Preservation Board. - The traffic study estimated 308 daily trips, with studied intersections operating at acceptable levels. Parking was calculated based on industry experience, not the minimum .5 spaces per unit allowed under state density bonus law. - The applicant emphasized the project's compliance with the Housing Accountability Act and state density bonus law, and noted that it is not requesting additional density beyond the 82 units allowed by a 2016 density transfer. - Commissioner questions focused on parking counts, employee staffing levels (daytime 10–30, nighttime 7–10, not 250 as suggested by a commenter), emergency generator coverage for casitas, and the secondary access road's design (improved roadway, not across fairways). - The fire marshal confirmed that the secondary access meets city requirements and can be used for evacuation when safe, and that the evacuation plan incorporates lessons from the 2017 fires, including early notification, contracted buses, and shelter-in-place options. - All commissioners expressed support, noting the project is well-designed, superior to the prior 2019 approval, and meets all required findings for the three resolutions. Key Outcomes - Resolution PC-RES-2026-022 (Highway 12 Massage): Unanimous vote (7-0) to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Director's denial of the Massage Establishment Certificate. The business must cease operations immediately; the property cannot be used for massage for two years; and Weihong Hu is permanently barred from operating a massage business in Santa Rosa. - Resolution PC-RES-2026-023 (CEQA Addendum): Unanimous vote (7-0) to adopt the Addendum to the 2019 Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. - Resolution PC-RES-2026-024 (Minor Use Permit): Unanimous vote (7-0) to approve the Minor Use Permit for the Emerald Isle CCRC, including the proposed main-building height. - Resolution PC-RES-2026-025 (Major Hillside Development Permit): Unanimous vote (7-0) to approve the Major Hillside Development Permit. - All decisions are final unless appealed to the City Clerk within 10 calendar days.

PLANNING AND ZONING 20% · MASSAGE REGULATION 14% · WILDFIRE MANAGEMENT 13% · PUBLIC HEARING 9%
09
AUG 18, 2026 · SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA · CITY COUNCIL
Santa Rosa City Council Regular Meeting - August 18, 2026

The Santa Rosa City Council met on August 18, 2026, for a regular meeting beginning with a closed session at 2:03 PM, followed by a study session at 3:00 PM, and the regular session at 4:00 PM. The meeting adjourned at 6:57 PM. Key actions included a study session on the South Santa Rosa Specific Plan, unanimous approval of a real property exchange for the City Hall campus, introduction of an ordinance banning irrigation of nonfunctional turf with potable water, and approval to place stormwater charges on the property tax roll. The Council also approved consent items including contracts, grants, and a conflict of interest code. Consent Calendar - 13.1 Approved Third Amendment to Blanket Purchase Order with KONE Inc. for elevator and wheelchair lift maintenance, extending term by three years and adding $160,000 for a total of $421,000. - 13.2 Awarded Contract C02129 to GCCI, Inc. for Transit Mall kiosk alterations in the amount of $552,200 (including 10% contingency). - 13.3 Awarded Contract C02456 to Team Ghilotti, Inc. for Downtown Connectivity to Support Housing Density in the amount of $4,157,055.10 (including 10% contingency). - 13.4 Adopted Resolution RES-2026-097 appropriating $22,534,460 in Expedited Drinking Water Grant funding from the State Water Resources Control Board for the Santa Rosa Water Consolidation Project. - 13.5 Adopted Resolution RES-2026-098 accepting a $358,323.06 grant from the California Highway Patrol Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program FY26/27. - 13.6 Adopted Resolution RES-2026-099 adopting an amended Conflict of Interest Code for designated city positions. Closed Session Report - The Council gave unanimous direction to legal counsel to initiate litigation against Pierce Manufacturing et al. regarding anticipated litigation (Item 3.1). No reportable action on the existing litigation (Item 3.2, Merlin Davis v. City of Santa Rosa). City Manager’s Report - City Manager Jason Nutt announced that Moody’s Ratings upgraded the City of Santa Rosa’s credit rating to Aa1, the second highest, with a stable outlook. - The Santa Rosa Police Department will host a community meeting on Flock automated license plate reader technology on September 17, 2026. - Seven SRPD officers were honored by Mothers Against Drunk Driving for making 614 DUI arrests in 2025; Officer Anthony Materi made over 100 DUI arrests, the third highest in Northern California. - The Ross Street activation is underway through October 31, 2026, featuring live music, food trucks, and family activities. - Registration opened for Fall Into Fitness, a free class demo day on September 19, 2026, at Finley Community Center. Public Comments & Testimony - Study Session (South Santa Rosa Specific Plan): Numerous speakers opposed the plan without stronger anti-displacement measures. Lina Blanco (North Bay Organizing Project), Caitlin Vejby (Legal Aid of Sonoma County), Norma Fernandez, Marina Nunes, Angel Portillo, Alex Pallais, Delfino Fioriano, and others expressed concerns about potential displacement and rent increases, particularly targeting Harmony Communities (corporate owner of mobile home parks). Abby Arnold (Santa Rosa YIMBY) expressed conditional support, emphasizing density near downtown and multimodal improvements. Fred Allebach urged inclusion of anti-displacement strategies. - Real Property Exchange (Item 15.1): Several speakers supported the exchange, with conditions on daylighting Santa Rosa Creek: Abby Arnold (Santa Rosa YIMBY), Richard Carlile, Derek Stephan, Evan Wiig, Joey Smith, Kevin Anderson (Chop’s Teen Club), Ellen Van Allen. Betty Andrews opposed due to insufficient creek land retained for flood management. Duane De Witt opposed, questioning fiscal prudence. Fred Allebach expressed general support but echoed creek concerns. - Non-Agenda Matters: Fred Allebach spoke on equity; Abby Arnold invited council to participate in “Week Without Driving” (Oct 1-8, 2026); Connie Jenkins requested naming a trail in Howarth Park after Rick Farella; Duane De Witt requested posting posters for Prisoners of War/Missing in Action Day; Daniel Pablo praised work on Hopper Avenue and suggested an innovative policies committee. Discussion Items - South Santa Rosa Specific Plan Draft Preferred Alternative (Study Session): Senior Planner Conor McKay and Supervising Planner Amy Nicholson presented the Draft Preferred Alternative, which combines elements of prior alternatives: a mixed-use corridor on Santa Rosa Avenue, higher density around Costco, and a network of parks and multimodal paths. The plan projects 6,300 new residential units and nearly 3 million square feet of non-residential construction at full build-out. No redesignation of 17 mobile home parks is proposed. Council members raised concerns about displacement, affordable housing, mobile home park protections, and infrastructure costs. Staff confirmed ongoing coordination with the county and that anti-displacement policies will be developed in the next phase. Council gave direction to proceed with the preferred alternative and continue policy development. - Real Property Exchange for City Hall Campus (Item 15.1): Real Property Manager Jill Scott, TPW Director Dan Hennessey, and CFO Scott Wagner presented a proposal to exchange the deteriorated City Hall campus (100, 90 Santa Rosa Avenue, 631 and 655 1st Street) for 520 3rd Street, owned by Museum on the Square, LLC (MOTS). The city will retain 1.61 acres containing Santa Rosa Creek and Matanzas Creek culverts. The exchange eliminates more than $100 million in deferred maintenance liability. The net purchase price differential of $4,546,868 will be funded from existing reserves ($4.5M previously assigned, $46,868 from available General Fund reserves). The city will lease back portions of the current campus for $2 for up to two years during renovation. Total implementation costs estimated at $17-20 million, with ongoing annual costs less than $1 million (versus $6 million to band-aid the existing campus). Developer Hugh Futrell (MOTS) spoke in support, emphasizing his track record and commitment to community engagement. After public comment, the Council unanimously adopted two resolutions: RES-2026-100 declaring the property exempt surplus land, and RES-2026-101 approving the exchange agreement. - Ordinance Introduction: Water Waste Regulations (Item 16.1): Water Use Efficiency Coordinator Lisa Cuellar presented an ordinance to comply with California AB 1572, prohibiting irrigation of nonfunctional turf with potable water on commercial, industrial, institutional properties, and HOA common areas, with staggered compliance deadlines starting January 1, 2027. The Council held a public hearing with no public comments and unanimously approved the first reading (7-0). The second reading is scheduled for September 15, 2026. - Stormwater Enterprise Charges on Tax Roll (Item 16.2): Research and Program Coordinator Nick Lynn presented the annual resolution to place Storm Water Enterprise charges on the Sonoma County Property Tax Roll. The current ERU fee is $43.52. Parcels below the county’s $10 minimum or with incorrect owner contacts are excluded. The Council held a public hearing with no comments and unanimously adopted Resolution RES-2026-102 (7-0). Key Outcomes - South Santa Rosa Specific Plan: Council received the study session and gave direction to staff to proceed with the Draft Preferred Alternative and develop anti-displacement policies in coordination with the county. - City Hall Exchange: Approved unanimously (7-0) via two resolutions, authorizing the exchange with MOTS LLC and declaring the property exempt surplus land. - Water Waste Ordinance: Introduced on first reading unanimously (7-0); second reading set for September 15, 2026. - Stormwater Charges: Resolution RES-2026-102 adopted unanimously (7-0) to place charges on the tax roll. - Closed Session Litigation: Council directed legal counsel to initiate litigation against Pierce Manufacturing et al. - Consent Items: All six consent items approved unanimously. - Designation of Voting Delegates: Council Member Rogers designated as voting delegate, Council Members Alvarez and MacDonald as alternates for the League of California Cities Annual Conference. - Minutes: July 28, 2026 minutes approved as submitted; August 4, 2026 minutes approved with Council Member MacDonald abstaining.

PLANNING AND ZONING 14% · REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT 11% · AFFORDABLE HOUSING 9% · WATER AND WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 9%
10
AUG 18, 2026 · SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA · CITY COUNCIL
Santa Rosa City Council Special Meeting: Closed Session and Litigation Direction (August 18, 2026)

The Santa Rosa City Council held a special meeting on August 18, 2026, convening at 1:30 PM in the Council Chamber and via Zoom. The meeting included a closed session for anticipated litigation, followed by a brief open session to report on actions taken. All seven council members were present for the open session. Closed Session - The Council recessed to closed session at 1:32 PM to discuss Item 3.1: Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (initiation of one potential case under Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(4)). - The closed session concluded at approximately 1:53 PM, and the Council reconvened at 1:55 PM. Key Outcomes - Litigation Direction: On a motion by Council Member Victoria Fleming, seconded by Council Member Dianna MacDonald, the Council unanimously voted (7-0) to give the City Attorney direction to initiate litigation regarding one potential case. Further information will be disclosed once commenced, per Government Code Section 54957.1. - The meeting was adjourned at 1:57 PM.

PROCEDURAL 100%
0102
NEXT →
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING INDEXUPDATED DAILY · openpublica.com