Planning Commission Regular Meeting – August 14, 2025
Planning Commission Regular Meeting – August 14, 2025
The Santa Rosa Planning Commission convened on August 14, 2025, at 4:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber. The meeting included approval of the July 24, 2025, minutes, public comments on non‑agenda items, a department report, and two public hearings. One hearing (Del Valle Drive Thru) was continued to a date uncertain, and the other (Annexation Pre‑Zoning at 2299 Brush Creek Road) was approved unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Janice Karrman spoke on the importance of trees, noting the removal of 48 trees over 75 years old in her neighborhood, the related infrastructure damage (caved‑in street, floodplain issues), and urged greater education and care regarding tree preservation.
- Duane De Witt (Roseland resident) spoke about development in Roseland, citing a 28‑year‑old RUDAT plan and a county report on inadequate pedestrian safety along Burbank Avenue. He expressed concern about cumulative impacts from new housing (hundreds of units at Roseland Village Shopping Center and along Sebastopol Road) and requested a community forum and a traffic signal at Hearn Avenue and Burbank Avenue. He urged the commission to advocate for the underserved Roseland community.
- Janice Karrman (during department reports) asked for clarification on the date and time of the City Council hearing on the Elm Tree Station appeal, which staff confirmed as August 19 at or after 5 p.m.
Discussion Items
- Minutes Approval (July 24, 2025): Approved as submitted with no public comments or corrections.
- Department Report: Staff Liaison Jessica Jones reported that the commission’s prior denial of the Elm Tree Station gas station project was appealed to the City Council; the appeal hearing is scheduled for August 19, 2025.
- Public Hearing – Del Valle Drive Thru (CUP23‑041): Continued to a date uncertain. No discussion or action taken.
- Public Hearing – Annexation Pre‑Zoning at 2299 Brush Creek Road (ANX24‑001): Project Planner Sachnoor Bisla presented the request to pre‑zone a 0.57‑acre parcel (currently county‑zoned RR B6‑20) to RR‑20 (Rural Residential) to allow annexation into the city for future sewer and water connections and an eventual ADU. The project is CEQA‑exempt (Sections 15183 and 15319). Commissioners asked about the rationale for RR‑20, the timeline (Planning Commission → City Council → LAFCO), infrastructure capacity, costs (paid by property owner), and the risk of creating a patchwork of county islands. Staff noted that LAFCO’s sentiment survey found no other property owners in the island interested in annexation, and that the boundary is logical and on the edge of the island. Two public speakers testified: Jerry Comrata (neighbor) supported the project and recounted his own unsuccessful annexation attempt due to topography and neighbor opposition; the property owner (female) stated that their septic system has failed and they need city sewer service, and confirmed an easement for a neighbor (which the applicant’s engineer clarified is not on the subject parcel and would not be affected). The commission deliberated and voted unanimously to recommend approval.
Key Outcomes
- Approved the July 24, 2025, meeting minutes as submitted.
- Continued the Del Valle Drive Thru public hearing (CUP23‑041) to a date uncertain.
- Adopted Resolution No. PC-RES-2025-013 recommending to the City Council pre‑zoning of 2299 Brush Creek Road to the RR‑20 (Rural Residential) zoning district. Motion by Commissioner Cisco, seconded by Vice Chair Duggan. Vote: 7‑0 (all commissioners in favor).
Meeting Transcript
Okay, everyone. I'd like to call the August fourteenth, twenty twenty five meeting of the planning commission to order, and if we could have roll please. Commissioner Carter. Commissioner Sisko. Commissioner Horton. Commissioner Pardo. Commissioner Sanders. We have one set of minutes from July 24th. Are there any changes or corrections, additions? Okay. So none for that. If you are in the chambers and wish to make a comment on the minutes, please make your way to the podium. Seeing no one, I will go ahead and close the public comment period on the minutes, and then we go to public comment period on non-agenda items. And Ms. Carmen, do you want to go first? Yes, thank you. Good afternoon, uh Planning Commissioners, Janice Carmen. Um I just want to uh bring up the importance of trees in Santa Rosa and or Sonoma County too, um, including um the clear cutting. And you know probably what I've talked about before about the clear cutting that has happened in my neighborhood. And um I think that there should be uh greater education on uh trees and how our environment uh evolves, not just specific thing like uh about the creeks or cleaning up the creeks or the ocean and cleaning up the ocean, you know, things like that. I I think that it should be part of everyone's education. And I studied uh forestry in a different state, but um once the trees are gone, they're gone. And and it's very, very tragic. And uh there's also uh infrastructure with the trees that has just come to my attention recently about how the street has imploded and is caved in and cracked. And uh these were very old trees, over 75 years old, and uh there were about 48 to uh 48 trees, I believe, that were cut uh to the ground. And it's also a flood um floodplain. So there's underwater running beneath the trees, and it's a sustainable uniquely um applicable um plan with with the trees, and I feel like the trees get sort of uh short-shifted, uh, and we have a lot of them here, and we're very, very fortunate. And the trees are largely responsible for uh the air quality and uh also our mostly good water. And um, I think people need to really realize that they're a leave living breathing thing, and during COVID, uh someone said to me we're all in this together, and they were talking about COVID, but we're all in this together for the climate, whether we like it or not, whether you believe in science or you don't believe in science, it's all related. And that's just what I want to communicate today is that we get more efficient and motivated to do more education around trees, and that we're also very careful when we cut and allow uh public building or any kind of building. Thank you. I'd like to check you down there. Okay, Mr. DeWitt, when you're ready and when the overhead's ready. Hello, my name is Dwayne DeWitt. I'm from Roseland. I brought this document from 28 years ago when the City of Santa Rosa was part of what was called a RUDAT, American Institute of Architects came to the town, talked with us about how they were gonna make things better. And I do believe we need to have a root at right now over for Roseland. Basically, planning is politics, and the politics right now is that housing gets to go in anywhere it wants to, especially in Roseland, and they're not paying attention to the larger uh issues at hand. One of those issues is that the infrastructure hasn't kept pace with what's going on. I have a document here from the uh county permit and resource management department. It's only uh 18 years old, but basically it pointed out that back in the day that the uh Roseland School District in the city had not adequately prepared to take care of the walkways along Burbank Avenue as it was improved that the risk to pedestrians by a new school that was being put in was high. And what's happened now is two housing developments have gone in along Burbank Avenue also, and they're not preparing the entire street for the needs of the community. With this in mind, there's been uh a rumor that we may be able to get um what's known as a traffic signal at the corner of um Hearn Avenue and Burbank Avenue. We've been asking for that for 20 years. They're saying it might happen this year. One of the things to keep in mind is the people who live in the community the longest do pay attention to what happens, and they're very concerned that the city allows numerous things to happen without catching up on the cumulative impacts that those things will have on the neighborhoods. It's really, really important that you folks be those advocates for the community. You may see them yourselves and the district uh elected official that appointed you as all you're answering to. But it's really important that you, as this planning commission, take on the advanced planning and not just rely upon staff, but you yourselves talk with the community.
openpublica.com