OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Sarasota City Commission Workshop on Parking Program and Future Funding - August 31, 2026

City CommissionMonday, August 31, 2026
BodySarasota, Florida
SessionCity Commission
DateMonday, August 31, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:00:32

Transcript — Verbatim
27:50

Okay.

27:51

Good morning and welcome to our special August thirty first City Commission workshop meeting.

28:02

Um we only have one item on the agenda.

28:06

Um, and I want to mention that City Auditor and Clerk Griggs is unable to join us today.

28:16

So deputy city auditor and clerks Laurie Rivers is with us on the dais today.

28:22

Um before we get started, I would like to exercise personal privilege to make a brief statement about what has been going on the past week.

28:50

And the misinformation was that the media was stating that public comment was not accepted at last Monday's open house.

29:11

And it was an advantage that it was written because many, many pages of those public comments that were submitted appeared as part of the permanent record for this meeting as background information.

29:30

So the commissioners have had a chance to review all of the public comment that was made last Monday.

29:37

And in addition, I believe that will also be addressed, and there will be some summary and feedback about it during today's presentation.

29:49

So to correct the record, there was public comment last Monday, and we have received it.

30:00

The other thing that I wanted to say is public notice of today's workshop clearly stated the regular rules of city workshops.

30:11

That we do not accept public comment at the workshop, and that it's for discussion purposes among the commissioners, because Robert's rules does not allow us to discuss at meetings unless there's a motion on the floor.

30:31

We need more information, which is what we're asking for today, before we'd even be in a position to make a reasonable motion.

30:42

So no motions, no voting on motions today, and the notice says no public comment.

30:52

Now I do have a concern that allowing public comment today would open the city to legal action regarding inadequate public notice.

31:06

Our public notice said no public comment at today's workshop.

31:12

So if we change that today, will there be people in the public who said, oh, well, your public notice said I would not be able to make a comment, so I didn't bother to come.

31:27

So you were unfair to me in your public comment by changing the rules on the fly.

31:34

That's just my statement.

31:36

So with that, I believe the city manager, did you want to make a statement?

31:42

Or later.

31:44

Yeah, if you're ready to get into the workshop.

31:46

Yeah, as soon as your statement, I was going to move forward with the agenda.

31:51

I have I would like to make a motion.

31:53

I think we're going to be able to do that.

31:54

Well, we haven't really opened the meeting yet.

31:57

Okay, yeah.

31:57

I think we need to um have either the city manager or you or somebody read this um proposed procedure should we decide to wave all the time.

32:09

Well, if if we choose to have that procedure, that's still up in the air.

32:14

So let's hear from city manager.

32:17

Well, I actually have some opening remarks to start with.

32:21

But um which okay, so should we so you should go through the procedural issues first for ministering today's workshop.

32:29

Okay.

32:29

And I will defer to attorney um Paul Zach if you have any additional questions.

32:33

I did provide an outline to the commission in the event that you chose to amend your own rules.

32:39

Um and that is just for your education purposes of this books.

32:44

Yeah.

32:44

So I believe you would um you wanted to make a motion.

32:48

I did.

32:48

Okay.

32:49

Uh if this is the appropriate time, I would move to suspend the commission's rules of procedure for this workshop for the limited purposes of allowing public comment following the staff presentation and initial commission questions, with each speaker limited to three minutes and a total public comment period limited to 30 minutes, which can also be extended.

33:09

Okay, and I will I will turn to um uh deputy city auditor and clerk rivers for the Roberts rules things in terms of um I believe there's no debate allowed.

33:25

That's correct.

33:26

And is it um it requires four affirmative votes to pass?

33:30

Four affirmative.

33:31

I'm sorry, was it Commissioner Albert who seconded it?

33:34

Yeah, I was I was waiting until we so it was moved by Commissioner A.

33:39

Heron Kotch seconded by Commissioner Alpert.

33:41

So I will do a roll call vote.

33:44

But let's just confirm there's no debate.

33:47

Right.

33:48

And we need requires four affirmative votes.

33:50

Four, and in addition to the roll call, should we be no, we're just gonna do roll call.

33:55

Okay.

33:56

Just yes or no.

33:57

Okay.

33:57

Okay.

33:58

Um did you want to weigh in?

34:03

I have plenty to say, but I don't know if now I'm not sure.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Parking Management█████████████████████████████████████████████62%
Public Engagement███████████15%
Public Meetings Law█████7%
Procedural██3%
Technology and Innovation██3%
Public Comment2%
Fiscal Sustainability2%
Public Perception2%
Public Safety2%
Summary of Proceedings

Sarasota City Commission Workshop on Parking Program and Future Funding - August 31, 2026

The Sarasota City Commission held a workshop on August 31, 2026, from 10:00 a.m. to approximately 1:34 p.m. to discuss the city's parking program, its financial challenges, and potential funding strategies. After initially stating that no public comment would be taken due to public notice rules, the commission voted 4-1 (Mayor Trice dissenting) to suspend its rules and allow up to 30 minutes of public comment, with each speaker limited to three minutes. The workshop focused on data regarding parking inventory, usage, revenue, costs, and options for sustainable funding.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • John Harshman (city resident) suggested creating a task force of 10 citizens and 3 staff members to develop recommendations within 45 days, emphasizing the need for collaboration.
  • Nicholas Dielsi (business owner) advocated for a 50-cent across-the-board increase, free Sundays, and ending enforcement from 8 p.m. to midnight, stating the current rules hurt businesses.
  • Rachel Burns (Executive Director, St. Armands Circle Association) expressed that city staff did not engage with her organization before changes were made, called for consistent signage and better app functionality, and urged the commission to meet with impacted parties.
  • Katherine Hermes (resident and business owner) focused on parking tickets, noting a 624% increase in citation payments (from 748 to 5,256 transactions) and called for three-hour time limits instead of two, and questioned the efficiency of in-house operations versus outsourcing.
  • Flo Entler (37-year resident) proposed selling or leasing parking garages to private operators, citing the St. Armands garage bond becoming callable in 2027, and suggested hiring a management company similar to Bobby Jones Golf Course.
  • Darci Jacob (small business owner) requested suspension of meters until a collaborative solution is reached and called for an audit and improved signage.
  • Brian Mattison (restaurant owner) echoed support for a task force and questioned whether expenses had been adequately reviewed for potential cuts.
  • Casey Gonzmart (former St. Armands Circle Association president and business owner) emphasized the need to restore free Sundays and limit paid parking to reasonable hours, noting ongoing recovery from hurricanes.
  • Leane Bugo (city resident) recommended a third-party audit of parking operations, noted that presented data covered only peak season, and advocated for a hybrid approach with incremental improvements.
  • Martin Hyde (city resident) argued for privatizing parking with contractual rate controls, claimed a 50-cent increase on current hours would have avoided the crisis, and criticized the $900,000 trolley subsidy as unrelated to parking.
  • Jonathan Van Dyke (resident) requested full-year data analysis, a color-coded zone system, and stakeholder engagement through direct dialogue rather than written comments.

Discussion Items

  • Staff (led by Steve Cover, Director of Planning, and Philip Deveau, Interim General Manager of Parking) presented detailed data: there are 9,527 total parking spaces, with 36% on-street, 44% in lots, and 20% in garages. Nearly 23,000 people visit Main Street daily; 86% of garage users are non-residents. The parking enterprise fund faces deficits of $2 million to $2.6 million annually over the next five years, driven by capital needs like elevator replacements and pay station upgrades.
  • Options presented included raising user fees (25 to 75 cents per hour), using general fund revenues (requiring a millage increase of 0.5111), creating a special district (business assessments of $3,600 to $6,079 per year), or hybrid approaches.
  • Commissioners questioned staff on cost reduction measures: Vice Mayor Ohlrich asked if an audit had been conducted (staff confirmed no recent audit but noted efforts like self-performing sign changes to save $15,000). Commissioner Alpert discussed loan financing for elevator replacements and the distinction between parking management and revenue recovery. Commissioner Battie favored a 50-cent increase (to $2) to simplify rates. Commissioner Ahearn-Koch raised concerns about format of the prior open house and requested analysis of eliminating meters in downtown.
  • Mayor Trice noted bank card fees of $626,000 annually and questioned the mission of the parking division, suggesting expanded wayfinding and last-mile connectivity.
  • City Manager Karie Friling outlined challenges including hurricane recovery, infrastructure, and the impending Amendment 3 referendum on November 3rd, which could significantly affect city revenues.

Key Outcomes

  • The commission voted 4-1 to suspend rules for limited public comment (motion by Commissioner Ahearn-Koch, seconded by Commissioner Alpert; Mayor Trice opposed).
  • City Manager Friling recommended, and commissioners concurred, to keep the current suspension of extended parking enforcement hours in place through at least November (replacing signage to reflect pre-June enforcement hours), continue developing programs such as business validation and enhanced valet services, and return with further recommendations after the November 3rd referendum. No formal action or motions were adopted, as this was a workshop.

Meeting Transcript

Okay. Good morning and welcome to our special August thirty first City Commission workshop meeting. Um we only have one item on the agenda. Um, and I want to mention that City Auditor and Clerk Griggs is unable to join us today. So deputy city auditor and clerks Laurie Rivers is with us on the dais today. Um before we get started, I would like to exercise personal privilege to make a brief statement about what has been going on the past week. And the misinformation was that the media was stating that public comment was not accepted at last Monday's open house. And it was an advantage that it was written because many, many pages of those public comments that were submitted appeared as part of the permanent record for this meeting as background information. So the commissioners have had a chance to review all of the public comment that was made last Monday. And in addition, I believe that will also be addressed, and there will be some summary and feedback about it during today's presentation. So to correct the record, there was public comment last Monday, and we have received it. The other thing that I wanted to say is public notice of today's workshop clearly stated the regular rules of city workshops. That we do not accept public comment at the workshop, and that it's for discussion purposes among the commissioners, because Robert's rules does not allow us to discuss at meetings unless there's a motion on the floor. We need more information, which is what we're asking for today, before we'd even be in a position to make a reasonable motion. So no motions, no voting on motions today, and the notice says no public comment. Now I do have a concern that allowing public comment today would open the city to legal action regarding inadequate public notice. Our public notice said no public comment at today's workshop. So if we change that today, will there be people in the public who said, oh, well, your public notice said I would not be able to make a comment, so I didn't bother to come. So you were unfair to me in your public comment by changing the rules on the fly. That's just my statement. So with that, I believe the city manager, did you want to make a statement? Or later. Yeah, if you're ready to get into the workshop. Yeah, as soon as your statement, I was going to move forward with the agenda. I have I would like to make a motion. I think we're going to be able to do that. Well, we haven't really opened the meeting yet. Okay, yeah. I think we need to um have either the city manager or you or somebody read this um proposed procedure should we decide to wave all the time. Well, if if we choose to have that procedure, that's still up in the air. So let's hear from city manager. Well, I actually have some opening remarks to start with. But um which okay, so should we so you should go through the procedural issues first for ministering today's workshop. Okay. And I will defer to attorney um Paul Zach if you have any additional questions. I did provide an outline to the commission in the event that you chose to amend your own rules. Um and that is just for your education purposes of this books. Yeah. So I believe you would um you wanted to make a motion. I did. Okay. Uh if this is the appropriate time, I would move to suspend the commission's rules of procedure for this workshop for the limited purposes of allowing public comment following the staff presentation and initial commission questions, with each speaker limited to three minutes and a total public comment period limited to 30 minutes, which can also be extended. Okay, and I will I will turn to um uh deputy city auditor and clerk rivers for the Roberts rules things in terms of um I believe there's no debate allowed. That's correct. And is it um it requires four affirmative votes to pass? Four affirmative. I'm sorry, was it Commissioner Albert who seconded it? Yeah, I was I was waiting until we so it was moved by Commissioner A. Heron Kotch seconded by Commissioner Alpert. So I will do a roll call vote.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com