City of Sheridan Study Session - May 11, 2026: GPET Ballot Question, Ola's Market Liquor License, and Wastewater Plant Bid
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
City of Sheridan Study Session - May 11, 2026
This study session of the Sheridan City Council covered five main agenda items: discussion of a resolution to place the 1-cent General Purpose Excise Tax (GPET) on the November 2026 ballot, a new restaurant liquor license for Ola's Market, a bid award for the Shared Wastewater Treatment Plant Rehabilitation Project, a discussion of the FY27 budget format, and general items for future agendas. No formal votes were taken; decisions are expected at the next regular meeting.
Discussion Items
1. Resolution 08-2-6: GPET Ballot Question
City Attorney Brad Timish presented the resolution to approve submitting the 1% GPET continuation to Sheridan County voters in the November 2026 general election. The tax funds are allocated to categories including facilities/infrastructure, public safety, water quality, open space, parks/pathways, community development, public health/community projects, heritage/arts, and seniors/family. Council members discussed the broad applicability of these categories, with one member noting that the city has become dependent on this optional tax for general operations and that citizens may not fully understand that. Another member emphasized the importance of GPET for infrastructure projects. The city administrator noted the county is waiting for at least two municipalities to vote before scheduling its own vote; the council plans to vote on the resolution next week. Members agreed on the need to better educate the public on GPET spending without advocating for a particular vote.
- Key Statistics: The GPET has been in effect since the late 1980s, voted every four years. The city receives approximately 66% of the 1% tax collected in the county.
2. New Restaurant Liquor License for Ola's Market
City Clerk Ashley Foster presented the application for a standard restaurant liquor license for Ola's Market, located at 1841 South Sheridan Avenue. The establishment now serves food (burgers, etc.) and wants to offer beer/wine. The application includes a fenced patio for alcohol service. No public concerns have been received. The state approval is pending, and the assistant city clerk will present the item for council approval next week.
3. Bid Award: Shared Wastewater Treatment Plant Rehabilitation Project
Utility Director Dan Roberts presented the bid award recommendation for the remaining priority improvements at the wastewater treatment plant. The project includes electrical upgrades (transformer/switchgear replacement), belt press replacement, raw sewage pump station rework, and headworks expansion (adding a second rotamat). The project was bid on April 28, 2026, receiving five bids. Prospect Construction submitted the low bid of $8,171,540, which is under the engineer’s estimate of approximately $9 million. The project is funded by a $14 million zero-interest, 30-year loan, which also covered the earlier North Clarifier replacement. The available budget for this remaining work is $9.5 million. Council members asked about Prospect Construction’s qualifications; staff confirmed they are a qualified, responsive bidder with an office in Sheridan and positive prior experience. Construction is expected to begin summer 2026 and last one year.
- Key Statistics: Bid amount: $8,171,540. Total loan: $14,050,000. North Clarifier replacement cost: approximately $2.85 million. Remaining project budget: $9.5 million.
4. FY27 Budget Discussion
The council reviewed the draft FY27 budget format. Members asked about the organizational structure of the budget document, specifically how departments are grouped and whether color-coded tabs (as used in the prior year) will be included. Staff indicated they are working to add similar navigation aids, but confirmed that if not available, members may need to use highlighters. Council also asked about the cigarette tax line item and whether it includes vaping products; staff will research and confirm.
5. General Discussion of Future Agenda Items
City Administrator Stuart provided updates: several police officers are attending National Police Week in Washington, D.C.; the chamber’s governmental update meeting is scheduled for May 13; public restrooms are now functional with a rigorous cleaning schedule; candidate filing for municipal elections begins May 14 and runs through May 29; and the administrator will attend a WAM board meeting. Council also noted public interest in a presentation from the hospital on critical care, and a request for an update on Dragon Wall’s alcohol license (the business has renewed but not yet opened).
Key Outcomes
- GPET Ballot Resolution: Council will vote at the next regular meeting. The county is awaiting city action before scheduling its vote.
- Ola’s Market Liquor License: Approval is expected at the next meeting, pending state confirmation.
- Wastewater Plant Bid Award: The council is expected to award the bid to Prospect Construction at the next meeting. Staff will also explore using remaining project funds for additional eligible work.
- FY27 Budget: No decisions made; format clarifications will be addressed before final adoption.
- Future Agenda Items: The council requested scheduling a hospital presentation and seeking an update on Dragon Wall's opening.
Meeting Transcript
We stand for the pledge, please. And one nation under God. Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the City of Sheridan's May 11th, 2026 study session. It's 5 30, so we'll get going. We have a total of five items on the agenda for tonight. So we'll just get right into it. Our first one is discussion of resolution 08-2-6 confirming the placement of the ballot question for one cent slash GPET or general purpose excise tax on the vote about thank you, the ballot. And with this is our city attorney Brad Timish. Mayor, Council, thank you. As the mayor stated, I'm before you today, discussion of resolution 8-26 approving the submission of the ballot question for one cent GPET. On Wyoming Statute 39-15-204 AI allows a county to impose an excise tax at a rate of 0.5% up to 2% upon retail sales of tangible personal property, admissions, and services made within that county. To impose that tax, the commissioner and 50% of the governing bodies within that county have to consent to and then consent to the proposition being submitted to the voters for the general election every four years. Provides for the cover governing body's approval to the submission of the proposition to cover to continue GPET to the voters of Sheridan County in the November 2026 general election. Also provided in the resolution provide how the state will allocate those funds to facility infrastructure, public safety, water quality, open space, parks, pathways, and recreation, community development, public health and community projects, heritage history and arts, and seniors and family. And then again, if this submission is approved, approved by the governing body and 50% of the other municipalities within the county and the county commissioners, this question will be presented to the voters come November. Shall the Board of County Commissioners for should the Board of County Commissioners for Sheridan County, Wyoming continue to impose an excise tax of 1% upon retail sales of tangible personal property admissions and services made within the Sheridan County for the purpose of general revenue as set forth in Wyoming Statute 39-15-203A? And then again, the the questions will be or the answers are for the county sales tax or against the county sales tax. Any questions? Any questions on this? Pretty straightforward. Which of those bullets does general operating costs for the city fall under Mr. Mayor, I'll I'll take a stab at that. I I'm not sure if I fully understand the question, but facilities and infrastructure, public safety, water quality, uh, open spaces, parks, pathways. Um pretty much the the uh probably the top four ones directly uh address uh city operations of some sort. Um we obviously don't have a public health uh and we don't well we community programs could loosely with our parks uh and the city uh uh Sheridan Public Arts Committee would fall under the arts uh piece of the sixth bullet. Um so to some degree uh the top six seniors and family obviously is not a city uh function that we have internal to our operations. Okay, uh presuming thank you for that answer. Um presuming that we are still potentially multiple years away from uh the airport being self-sustaining, um where would our contributions to the airport fall into that? I think it's under uh yeah, probably facilities and infrastructure, it could be under a community programs to some degree. Okay. I guess the reason I'm asking these questions is because we've all been on one side or another of the fence of claiming that people either do or do not have any right to object to or have objection to the GPET spending because they were all told how we're gonna spend it. And I think if uh it's broad enough terminology that it can include anything that's within you know the purview of the city, that uh maybe it would be uh helpful to citizens to just know that some of this money will be spent on the general operating costs of the city to go along with the previous city attorney's um statement that the city would have to essentially take a pay cut if it didn't pass. So what that essentially means is that um our city at its current level of spending has become dependent upon the passing of an optional tax in order to maintain that level of spending, and I think that that's something that a lot of the citizens are not hearing when they're reading this list. Go ahead. Can we have some clarity on the statement we made about um being able to get as employees? What do you say about? I'm sorry, I don't mean to be the general operating costs of the city. It was stated previously that the that the city would have to quote unquote take a pay cut, in other words, uh reduce its planned expenditures if this didn't pass. Okay, so Clarity, I'm just I'm sorry, you should pay code years meant the city, not the employees. Okay, just for clarity, thank you. Go ahead. I mean, that's just a fact. If our income goes down, we're gonna have to adjust for it. That's all it is. It's not that we're overspending, it's that this has been voted in, and we're spending the money that we have. If we have to cut, it's gonna hurt. So something's gonna give. Go ahead, counselor. Well, one of the things that I really like about the um GPEP funding is how much that helps us in our public works projects. If you all remember last week when we had the presentation of all the infrastructure projects that we had going, they're all funded through GPET.
openpublica.com