The South San Francisco Planning Commission held a special meeting on Thursday, January 24, 2019, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Manager's Conference Room at 400 Grand Avenue. With the Chair position vacant and Vice Chair JulieAnn Murphy absent, the commission selected ad hoc officers. The commission reordered the agenda to consider the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement for city-owned properties first, followed by a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a cannabis distribution operation. Both items were approved. No members of the public spoke during oral communications or the public hearings.
The commission adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Third Amendment, including the one-year extension. The motion passed unanimously (Commissioners Shihadeh, Tzang, Evans, Wong, and Faria in favor; Commissioner Murphy absent).
Commissioner Zhang to introduce a motion to appoint or let the uh an ad hoc chair and vice chair since both our chair and vice chair are not here tonight. I would like to just to my comments. Yes, I would like to uh motion to um uh elect and uh chair first then and the chance uh the candidate being uh commissioner uh commissioner is there a second second like to make a motion to appoint that off for the vice chair for this meeting. Do that with the column normally Mr. Wong Okay, I will call to order the meeting of the South Subscope Planning Commission for the January 24th. We'll maybe still for the Pledge of Allegiance Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and the calling for which it says one nation under God. Commissioner Zhang? Here commissioner Shahade? Here Commissioner Evans here. Complained Chair Wong? Here Chair Faria here and Vice Chair Murphy is absent this evening. Agenda review uh Chair Faria um one request uh for for the planning commission to consider uh we have an item item uh three and three eight uh perhaps considering uh taking that item first and then uh taking the second item after that. Okay, with that we have any oral communications from the audience okay with that we'll move on to the consent calendar and approve the minutes from uh the November 15th and the December 20th meetings. We'll do them both at once or things. Okay. I'd like to go ahead. Meeting minutes of November 15, 2018, and meeting minutes of December 20th, 2018. We're the second second. Okay. Commissioner Zhang. Yes. Commissioner Shahade? Yes. Commissioner Evans, yes. Chair Faria? Yes. And Commissioner Evans is absent this evening. I mean Commissioner Rick V. Okay. With that, Madam Clerk, we will move on to item three for our agenda adjustment. So maybe we have it reading of item three. Report regarding a third amendment to the development agreement for the sale of city-owned properties at 418 Linden Avenue and 201 to 219 Grand Avenue. Okay, with that I'll open up public hearing. Take it away, just take it back. Yeah. Yes, for the county. Commissioners, uh my name's Michael Appen and I'm going to be able to do that. The mic's not amplifying your voice, it's just the cabin as for speaking. Uh good evening, Commissioners. My name's Mike Lappman. I'm with I'm uh economic development coordinator with the economic development department, and I work with Julie Bernard, who's also my is the interim deputy director of the housing and the housing and economic development division of the ECD department. Well we're also uh tonight uh the executive president vice president of Rome is with us. So there are questions that are uh uh directed towards Rome. That could certainly certainly answer those questions. Um the uh uh item in front of you is a an item that is only for the DA. This is not for entitlement. Uh this is uh a uh third amendment to uh development agreement that was approved initially back in uh 2017 uh with the uh the approval of the project uh through Rome. So it's basically it does not include any changes to the development itself. There are no changes to parking standards, there are no changes to the number of units, there's no changes to the design, there's no changes to the building itself or the configuration. What we're looking at are changes to the development agreement in terms of the length of time, where it's uh which would be the expand uh the extension of the one year and the ability to allow the department developer to go ahead and demo the property.