The South San Francisco Planning Commission held its regular meeting on Thursday, June 20, 2019, at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Services Building. The commission approved the consent calendar, recommended approval of a commercial condominium conversion, recommended approval of a major mixed-use development near the Caltrain station, and found the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Capital Improvement Program consistent with the General Plan. Key actions included modifying a community benefits condition to ensure payment even if a proposed CFD is not formed, and removing the parking reduction request for the 200 Airport Boulevard project while retaining the TDM plan.
Planning commission, could you please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance? Thank you. Madam Clerk, can we have roll call, please? Commissioner Zhang. Here. Commissioner Shahade? Here. Commissioner Evans? Here. Commissioner Bernardo? Here. Commissioner Furrier. Here. Vice Chair Wong? Here. Chair Murphy. Here. All are present. Thank you. Um agenda review. Do we have any changes to tonight's agenda? Thank you, Chair. Uh, if it so pleases you, we would uh like to request that we move administrative business four and four A to the beginning of the agenda tonight. Uh that is okay with me. It's okay with the rest of the Commission. Uh do we have any speaker cards for an item that is not on tonight's agenda? No, we do not. Is there anyone in the audience who'd like to speak on the item that is not on tonight's agenda? Okay. With that, can we have a reading of um item administrative business item number four, please? Report regarding a resolution finding that the proposed fiscal year 2019-20 capital improvement program is consistent with the city's general plan in accordance with government code section 65401. Good evening, uh Chair Murphy, Vice Chair Wong, and Commissioners. My name is Matt Rubel, your principal engineer. Uh so state law requires that the planning commission review uh the proposed physical year 1920 capital improvement program uh to find it it conforms with the city's adopted general plan. As you're aware, the CIP outlines the large capital expenditures and infrastructure improvements throughout the city. Uh this year's total fiscal year 1920 CIP budget is proposed to be 101.2 million dollars with 53.8 million of newly appropriations and an estimated 47.4 million remaining appropriations from last year's projects. The city CIP adoption process has been streamlined into the planning commission meeting to include both presentation of the new projects for this year and uh have you guys find if it's uh consistent with the city's general plan. The uh proposed projects included in the CIP are classified um into street resurfacing, sewer rehabilitation, um capital improvements uh throughout the city. Um so just kind of want to go through and highlight some five of the new projects that we have for this year. Um so we have two public facilities improvements. One is to the removing of unnecessary ground underground fuel tanks at the oyster point marina. We have the improving oyster point peninsula to reduce flooding, which is uh mitigation required by the state water resources control board. We have two storm drain projects. There's a uh Hillside Camaritas slide repair, which repairs and stabilizes the valley gutter and hillside at Hickey Boulevard and Camaritas Avenue to prevent future erosion, and then we have South Linden Storm Drain Repair, which repairs and lines a storm drain pipe at South Linden Avenue and San Mateo Avenue. And lastly, there's the West Orange Avenue and Hillside Boulevard pedestrian crossing improvement, which provides pedestrian improvements such as flashing beacons or high visibility crosswalks at various intersections. Um so that's my very brief staff report. Um I'm happy to uh answer any questions you have, and I hope that um planning commission adopts a resolution finding that the CIP for fiscal year 1920 is consistent with the city's general plan. And with that, I'd be happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Is there anything from the commissioners for the presenter?