The South San Francisco Planning Commission met on January 17, 2020, to consider several items including amendments to a development agreement for the Gateway Business Park, a digital billboard project at 345 Shaw Road, a master sign program for the Genesis campus, and the annual reorganization of the commission. All items were approved unanimously.
Item number two. Report regarding a resolution making findings and determining that the disposition of the city of South San Francisco owned property located at 323 Miller Avenue in the residential core district is in conformity with the South San Francisco adopted general plan in accordance with provisions of state planning law govern code Section 65402 with the company resolution Thank you. Before I move on, is it okay that we're on our screens are not showing tonight's meeting? Oh, there we are. Okay. Is there anyone on the commission who would wish to um move any of the items on the consent calendar off of the consent calendar? No. Anything from staff on these items? No. Um with that, do I have a motion on the consent calendar? I'll make a motion. On items one and two. Do I need to read out each motion individually or so for the whole consultation? It could just be to approve the items on there on the motion to approve the items on the consent calendar. I'll second. Can I have a roll call, please? Commissioner Evans? Yes. Commissioner Ferrara? Yes. Commissioner Zhang? Yes. Commissioner Shahade? Yes. Commissioner Bernardo? Yes. Vice Chair Wong? Yes. Chairperson Murphy. Yes. Motion passes. Thank you. Can we move on to item number three and have a reading of the item, please, for public hearing? Report regarding consideration of a first amendment to the second amended and reinstated development agreement to the Gateway Business Plan Park Master Plan Project between the City of South San Francisco and BMR 700 Gateway LP, BMR 750, 800, 850 Gateway LP, BMR 900 Gateway LP, and BR BMR 1000 Gateway LP to make minor modifications to the previously adopted development agreement and determining that no subquential environmental document is necessary pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines with an accompanying resolution. Thank you. With that, I'll turn it over to staff for staff report. Yeah, good evening, Chair Murphy, Vice Chair Wong, and fellow commissioners. So the project that we are talking about you all are fairly familiar with. We're uh looking at the gateway master plan. Um this shows the general location with the overall master plan boundaries highlighted in red. Um a master plan and phase one precise plan were approved back in 2013. Um phase one as it was originally approved. As anybody who's driven by knows, uh it is now basically up and looks like that image. The shell was recently completed and tenant improvements are currently being worked on. Most recently, phases two and three of uh the precise plans for phases two and three were reviewed by the planning commission. Construction has begun on phase two uh with vertical construction now apparent. Um as you can see the the site is progressing quickly as part of all of them, the master plan project. The city did enter into a development agreement with the applicants. Uh the planning commission has reviewed a couple of amendments to the development agreements. Most recently was the second amended and restated DA, uh, which was in 2018.