OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

South San Francisco Planning Commission Regular Meeting - June 16, 2022

Planning CommissionThursday, June 16, 2022
BodySouth San Francisco, California
SessionPlanning Commission
DateThursday, June 16, 2022
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:15

All right.

0:15

We've got everyone.

0:21

I know.

0:22

Commissioner DePaz Fernandez will be joining.

0:25

Um, but we can go ahead and get started if you want, Chair Shahade.

0:33

Ready?

0:36

Okay.

0:37

Ready.

0:39

Welcome to the Thursday, June 16, 2022, regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission.

0:48

This meeting is being held in accordance with the Brown Act as currently in effect under the provisions of Assembly Bill 361, which allows attendance by members of the Planning Commission, city staff, and the public to participate and conduct the meeting by teleconference.

1:10

Teleconference locations are not open to the public.

1:15

To provide a comment during the meeting, please use raise hand function indicating you would like to speak, and you will be unmuted in order during the times reserved for public comments.

1:30

You will have three minutes to make your comments.

1:48

And we will read into the record emails or message comments that you can provide us.

1:55

Please note that all commission time limits and rules of the decorum will apply public comments.

2:12

Will you please stand and join me for the pledge of allegiance?

2:19

I pledge allegiance to the flag to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands.

2:37

May we please have roll call?

2:40

Chair Shahade.

2:43

Here.

2:46

Commissioner Funis.

2:48

Here.

2:49

Commissioner Evans.

2:51

Here.

2:52

Commissioner Murphy.

2:54

Here.

2:54

And I see Commissioner Depaz Fernandez has joined us.

2:59

Thank you.

3:04

Are there any changes to the agenda?

3:07

I'm here.

3:08

Oh Commissioner Faria.

3:13

Here.

3:14

In spirit and in body.

3:16

Thank you.

3:22

Are there any changes to the agenda?

3:25

No changes proposed, Chair.

3:30

At this time, does any member of the public wish to address the commission on an item that is not on the agenda tonight?

3:38

At this time, please use the raise hand feature to indicate that you would like to provide a comment.

3:45

At this time, I will ask the clerk if there are any members of the public who would like to provide comments, or if there are any comments received by email or voicemail.

3:57

To the chair, I'm frantically scrolling and I don't see any emails received up to this moment, and no hands are raised among our attendees.

4:22

Did any site or project visits, had interactions with third parties, or has any conflict regarding any items on the agenda?

4:32

You may disclose them at this time.

4:35

If you would like to review yourself for an item, you can also do that at this time.

4:45

Hearing none, we will move on to the next item.

4:55

Next on the agenda is a consent calendar.

5:00

May we have a listing of the consent calendar item?

5:01

Absolutely, Chair.

5:03

Uh consent calendar item one is a report regarding a resolution finding that the proposed fiscal year 2022-23 capital improvement program is consistent with the city's general plan in accordance with government code section 65401.

5:22

Matt Rubel, Principal Engineer and Eugene Kim, Public Works Director, City Engineer.

5:27

Uh, item one A is the companion resolution, and we're looking for a motion on this unless the um commission is interested in pulling the item for questions.

5:46

Does any commissioner wish to pull an item from consent calendar?

5:58

Do we need to make a motion to accept?

6:12

Does any member of the public wish to address the commission on an item on the consent calendar at this time?

6:18

Please use raise hand feature to indicate that you would like to provide a comment.

6:25

At this time, I will ask the clerk if there are any members of the public who would like to provide comments, or if there are any comments received by email or voicemail.

6:37

I see no hands raised at the moment, no emails received or voicemails on this on any of the consent items.

6:48

Hearing no speakers, I would entertain a motion on the consent calendar.

6:55

I make the motion we approve the consent calendar.

6:59

Second, okay.

7:07

Commissioner Fria.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Planning██████████████████████████████30%
Design Review██████████████████18%
Procedural███████████11%
Community Benefits███████7%
Housing██████6%
Environmental Protection██████6%
Affordable Housing██████6%
Engineering And Infrastructure█████5%
Parking Management██2%
Summary of Proceedings

South San Francisco Planning Commission Regular Meeting - June 16, 2022

The South San Francisco Planning Commission met on Thursday, June 16, 2022, at 7:00 PM via teleconference. The meeting covered three main agenda items: a consent calendar item for the Capital Improvement Program, a public hearing for a new amenity building at 466 Forbes Boulevard, a public hearing for a major residential development at 40 Airport Boulevard, and an administrative report on the Zoning Ordinance Update. All items were approved or recommended for approval, with the Zoning Ordinance Update scheduled for further discussion.

Consent Calendar

  • Item 1: The Commission unanimously approved a resolution finding that the proposed Fiscal Year 2022-23 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the City’s General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65401. The motion passed without discussion or public comment.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No members of the public provided oral or written comments during the meeting on any agenda items.

Discussion Items

  • Item 2: 466 Forbes Boulevard – Design Review for Amenity Building

    • Staff presented a proposal for a 40,000-square-foot, two-story amenity building (50 feet tall) on a 3-acre site in the Business Technology Park zone. The building would include food service, entertainment, fitness facilities, and meeting spaces, with public access to some amenities. The existing 60,000 sq ft warehouse would be demolished, and 180 service parking spaces added. The Design Review Board (DRB) recommended approval on March 15, 2022. An Environmental Consistency Analysis (ECA) found no new significant impacts. The applicant team (FLAD Architects and Fletcher Studio) presented the design, emphasizing wind mitigation and connection to the Rails-to-Trails path. Commissioners praised the design, landscaping, and public-access elements. A motion to approve the project with CEQA findings passed unanimously (7-0).
  • Item 3: 40 Airport Boulevard – 292-Unit Residential Development

    • Staff presented a comprehensive application including a General Plan Amendment, Downtown Station Area Specific Plan Amendment, Rezoning to a Planned Development District, Design Review, Transportation Demand Management Plan, and Affordable Housing Agreement. The project would demolish an existing 35,000 sq ft industrial building and construct an 8-story building with 292 units (15% affordable: 15 very-low-income units, 29 low-income units), 308 vehicle parking spaces (1.05 spaces/unit, unbundled for market-rate units), 135 bicycle parking spaces, and all-electric design. The site is 1.63 acres, bounded by Caltrain tracks, San Mateo Avenue, Airport Boulevard, and Highway 101. The DRB reviewed the project on March 16, 2021, and recommended approval. A Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) was prepared, receiving three comment letters with no substantive concerns. The applicant (Blake Griggs Properties) highlighted community benefits, including $100,000 for bike lane improvements, $630,000 contribution to a Community Facilities District, intersection safety improvements (removal of slip lane), and a TDM plan to reduce vehicle trips by 20%. Commissioner discussion raised concerns about construction traffic, parking, and access constraints. The Commission added a condition requiring a construction coordination committee to manage traffic during peak hours. Two motions were made: (1) to adopt a resolution recommending City Council adopt the SCEA (passed 7-0), and (2) to adopt a resolution recommending City Council approve the entitlements with conditions (passed 7-0).
  • Item 4: Zoning Ordinance Update (Administrative Business)

    • Principal Planner Billy Gross presented an overview of the draft Zoning Ordinance Update, which follows the recently updated General Plan. Key changes include: new form-based districts for change areas (e.g., El Camino corridor, Lindenville, South Airport), updated parking and TDM requirements, a community benefits program for non-residential projects (fee-based density bonuses), and objective design standards to comply with state law. The Commission received the presentation and agreed to schedule a future meeting for in-depth discussion, requesting additional materials such as a summary of major changes and metrics for community benefits. No action was taken.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Calendar Approved: Unanimous approval of the FY 2022-23 CIP consistency resolution.
  • 466 Forbes Boulevard Amenity Building Approved: Design Review and CEQA findings approved (7-0).
  • 40 Airport Boulevard Residential Project Recommended for Approval: Two resolutions passed unanimously (7-0) recommending City Council adopt the SCEA and approve the entitlements, with an added condition for construction traffic management.
  • Zoning Ordinance Update: Commission will continue review at a future meeting; no vote taken.
  • All meetings were conducted virtually under AB 361, with no public comments received.

Meeting Transcript

All right. We've got everyone. I know. Commissioner DePaz Fernandez will be joining. Um, but we can go ahead and get started if you want, Chair Shahade. Ready? Okay. Ready. Welcome to the Thursday, June 16, 2022, regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission. This meeting is being held in accordance with the Brown Act as currently in effect under the provisions of Assembly Bill 361, which allows attendance by members of the Planning Commission, city staff, and the public to participate and conduct the meeting by teleconference. Teleconference locations are not open to the public. To provide a comment during the meeting, please use raise hand function indicating you would like to speak, and you will be unmuted in order during the times reserved for public comments. You will have three minutes to make your comments. And we will read into the record emails or message comments that you can provide us. Please note that all commission time limits and rules of the decorum will apply public comments. Will you please stand and join me for the pledge of allegiance? I pledge allegiance to the flag to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. May we please have roll call? Chair Shahade. Here. Commissioner Funis. Here. Commissioner Evans. Here. Commissioner Murphy. Here. And I see Commissioner Depaz Fernandez has joined us. Thank you. Are there any changes to the agenda? I'm here. Oh Commissioner Faria. Here. In spirit and in body. Thank you. Are there any changes to the agenda? No changes proposed, Chair. At this time, does any member of the public wish to address the commission on an item that is not on the agenda tonight? At this time, please use the raise hand feature to indicate that you would like to provide a comment. At this time, I will ask the clerk if there are any members of the public who would like to provide comments, or if there are any comments received by email or voicemail. To the chair, I'm frantically scrolling and I don't see any emails received up to this moment, and no hands are raised among our attendees. Did any site or project visits, had interactions with third parties, or has any conflict regarding any items on the agenda? You may disclose them at this time. If you would like to review yourself for an item, you can also do that at this time. Hearing none, we will move on to the next item. Next on the agenda is a consent calendar. May we have a listing of the consent calendar item? Absolutely, Chair. Uh consent calendar item one is a report regarding a resolution finding that the proposed fiscal year 2022-23 capital improvement program is consistent with the city's general plan in accordance with government code section 65401. Matt Rubel, Principal Engineer and Eugene Kim, Public Works Director, City Engineer. Uh, item one A is the companion resolution, and we're looking for a motion on this unless the um commission is interested in pulling the item for questions.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com