OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Sparks, Nevada/City Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Sparks City Council Meeting – September 14, 2026

City Council & Boards — Monday, September 14, 2026
BodySparks, Nevada
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateMonday, September 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:15:29

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
5:10

Order the Spark City Council meeting for September 14th with a roll call.

5:15

Mayor Lawson here.

5:16

Council members Abbott.

5:17

Here.

5:17

Vanderwell.

5:18

Here.

5:18

Anderson.

5:19

Here.

5:19

Bibee.

5:20

Here.

5:20

Rodriguez.

5:21

City Attorney Duncan.

5:22

City Manager Lausin.

5:24

Here.

5:24

We have a quorum.

5:25

Thank you.

5:26

Okay.

5:26

Our invocation will be done by Pastor Barb West.

5:42

Good afternoon.

5:43

Bow your heads with me and let's pray.

5:47

Father in heaven, how thankful we are that we can begin this great council with prayer.

5:53

Thank you, Lord, for Mayor Blassen and for the fine council that you put together.

6:00

Pray that you would be with them and give them your wisdom today as they execute the business of Sparks, Nevada.

6:08

And Lord, we pray over our firefighters and our police force and our first responders and ask you to keep them all safe.

6:17

Thank you for them and their dedication.

6:21

Be with our school children and our teachers as well, Lord.

6:25

And Lord, all of the things that are on the agenda for today.

6:41

And we thank and praise you in Jesus' name.

6:44

Amen.

6:46

Uh Ms.

6:47

Vanderwill, will you lead us in the place?

6:49

Yes.

6:58

One nation under problem.

7:01

With liberty and justice for all.

7:04

Okay.

7:07

All right, we'll move into public comment.

7:10

We have Joan Bowman.

7:21

It's on.

7:21

Do I need to do that?

7:22

Green lightning, it's on, yes, perfect.

7:24

Good afternoon.

7:25

Thank you for this opportunity to speak to you.

7:28

I am speaking today in opposition to Flock and Exxon cameras, of which there are 86 in the city of Sparks at the cost of 225,000 a year.

7:40

The data here are maintained for 30 days, and I believe this is excessive.

7:45

In the state of Washington, at least eight cities now have turned off their cameras and definitely ended their contracts or cut ties with Flock in response to public backlash.

8:48

Police officers have repeatedly abused the system for personal stalking.

8:54

According to Newsweek, Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin.

9:05

All have had police officers with allegations of misusing this data.

9:10

You're fooling yourself if you think we're any better.

9:13

USA Today reports that it wasn't looked into by law enforcement until journalists started questioning.

9:51

And eventually it's gonna be misused here, and you guys will be liable for violating our civil rights.

9:57

Thank you for this time.

10:00

Walt Rosenberg.

10:08

Mr.

10:08

Mayor, Council members, our attorney, and our city manager and our wonderful clerks.

10:15

Um I drive home from Vista Boulevard up Los Altos, and then I go up Belmore.

10:23

And between Vista and Belmore, there are a lot of leaks from the sprinkler systems in the street.

10:31

And I think it's unfortunate that water's being wasted and that the streets are wet.

10:38

So I just hope something gets done about it.

10:46

Oh, great.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Planning███████████████████████████████31%
Procedural███████████████15%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████████14%
Affordable Housing█████████9%
Public Engagement████████8%
Public Safety██████6%
Business Licensing██████6%
Fiscal Sustainability█████5%
Homelessness████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Sparks City Council Meeting – September 14, 2026

The Sparks City Council met on September 14, 2026, at 20:55 UTC for a regular meeting. The council unanimously approved consent items, several development agreements, ordinance updates, and land-use changes. Key decisions included a forensic services contract with the Washoe County Sheriff’s Office, an impact fee credit for flood control, adoption of a business license ordinance rewrite, and three related approvals for a mini-warehouse project at 3940 Pyramid Way. A previously appealed conditional use permit was withdrawn, requiring no action.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved agenda items 8.1 through 8.6 as submitted.
  • Approved the minutes of the August 24, 2026 meeting.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Joan Bowman spoke in opposition to Flock and ALPR cameras, citing 86 cameras in Sparks at a cost of $225,000 per year. She argued data retention of 30 days is excessive and noted misuse by police in other states.
  • Walt Rosenberg reported water leaks from sprinkler systems on Belmore Street between Vista Boulevard and Los Altos, urging the city to address the waste.

Discussion Items

  • Proclamation: Council proclaimed September 23, 2026 as “Accentuate the Positive Day” in recognition of Truckee Meadows Tomorrow’s community engagement efforts.
  • Building Code Board of Appeals (9.1): Appointed Brett McElhaney as structural engineer representative and Matthew Myers as mechanical/plumbing contractor representative for two-year terms ending September 30, 2028.
  • Forensic Services Agreement (9.2): Approved a new contract (AC 6209) with the Washoe County Sheriff’s Office for FY26-27 at a not-to-exceed amount of $800,000, reflecting a $200,000 credit from prior overpayments. The new billing system allows the Sparks Police Department to select only needed tests, reducing costs.
  • Impact Fee Credit Agreement (9.3): Approved agreement number 31 with Five Ridges Development Company, providing $513,820 in flood control fee credits within Impact Fee Service Area One for oversized detention and sedimentation basins built by the developer.
  • Business License Ordinance (10.1): Adopted Bill 2860 amending Title V of the Sparks Municipal Code to modernize business license processes, clarify the chief license officer role, update appeal procedures, and add a tiered penalty review. No fee changes.
  • CDBG Annual Performance Report (10.2): Approved the CAPER for FY25-26, documenting $739,006 in new entitlement funding, expenditures on pedestrian improvements, homeless services (Eddy House), fair housing education (Silver State), and challenges with contractor availability for deferred loan programs.
  • Comprehensive Plan Amendment – 3940 Pyramid Way (11.1): Adopted Resolution 3502, changing the land use designation from Large Lot Residential to Commercial for a 1.88-acre parcel.
  • Rezoning – 3940 Pyramid Way (11.2): Adopted Bill 2859, rezoning the same parcel from SF-40 (Single-Family Residential) to C-2 (General Commercial).
  • Conditional Use Permit – Mini Warehouse (11.3): Approved CU23-0008 to allow a 108,900-square-foot, four-story climate-controlled mini warehouse on the site, subject to 11 conditions. The building will have access only from Disk Drive, use a septic tank, and feature architectural articulation.
  • Sparks Galleria Plan Amendment (11.4): Adopted Bill 2862, amending the development handbook to increase the Costco fuel station’s dispensing nozzles from 18 to 24, add canopy sign standards (one 20-square-foot sign per side), and clarify the definition of convenience store service stations.
  • Appeal Withdrawal – Recycling Center (11.5): The appeal of the planning commission’s approval of a recycling center CUP at 650 Vista Boulevard was withdrawn. A public hearing was held but no action taken.

Key Outcomes

  • All votes were unanimous (8-0) where recorded.
  • Council directed the city manager to prepare an agenda item for September 28, 2026, to consider sponsoring a regional plan amendment to remove parcels south of Clean Waterway from Sparks’ sphere of influence.
  • The forensic services agreement includes a $200,000 credit per year for two years; actual FY25-26 costs were $121,000 after credit.
  • The CDBG CAPER noted that $549,726 in pedestrian improvement funds will be carried forward to FY26-27.
  • The mini-warehouse conditional use permit is contingent on the comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning approvals above.

Meeting Transcript

Order the Spark City Council meeting for September 14th with a roll call. Mayor Lawson here. Council members Abbott. Here. Vanderwell. Here. Anderson. Here. Bibee. Here. Rodriguez. City Attorney Duncan. City Manager Lausin. Here. We have a quorum. Thank you. Okay. Our invocation will be done by Pastor Barb West. Good afternoon. Bow your heads with me and let's pray. Father in heaven, how thankful we are that we can begin this great council with prayer. Thank you, Lord, for Mayor Blassen and for the fine council that you put together. Pray that you would be with them and give them your wisdom today as they execute the business of Sparks, Nevada. And Lord, we pray over our firefighters and our police force and our first responders and ask you to keep them all safe. Thank you for them and their dedication. Be with our school children and our teachers as well, Lord. And Lord, all of the things that are on the agenda for today. And we thank and praise you in Jesus' name. Amen. Uh Ms. Vanderwill, will you lead us in the place? Yes. One nation under problem. With liberty and justice for all. Okay. All right, we'll move into public comment. We have Joan Bowman. It's on. Do I need to do that? Green lightning, it's on, yes, perfect. Good afternoon. Thank you for this opportunity to speak to you. I am speaking today in opposition to Flock and Exxon cameras, of which there are 86 in the city of Sparks at the cost of 225,000 a year. The data here are maintained for 30 days, and I believe this is excessive. In the state of Washington, at least eight cities now have turned off their cameras and definitely ended their contracts or cut ties with Flock in response to public backlash. Police officers have repeatedly abused the system for personal stalking. According to Newsweek, Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin. All have had police officers with allegations of misusing this data. You're fooling yourself if you think we're any better. USA Today reports that it wasn't looked into by law enforcement until journalists started questioning.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com