Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Spearfish City Council held a study session on February 11, 2026, from 4:20 p.m. to 6:19 p.m. in City Council Chambers. Mayor Senden presided, with council members Hafner, Klarenbeek, Myers, and Rath present; Hourigan and Jacobs absent. Staff included Finance Officer DeNeui, Public Works Director McMahon, and Community Development Director Wysocki. The agenda was amended to move the City Grant Policy discussion before the TIF presentation. The council reviewed the upcoming regular meeting agenda for February 17, 2026, and discussed four major items: grant management, tax increment finance districts, snow removal subscription service, and the D.C. Booth Society agreement.
Finance Officer DeNeui introduced a proposal to have the South Dakota Community Foundation (SDCF) manage the city’s community partner grants (excluding hospitality tax grants to Western Hills Humane Society, Matthews Opera House, and D.C. Booth). Beth Massa from SDCF explained that their affiliate fund coordinator would handle application collection, financial verification, and payment processing, providing administrative relief to city staff. The council would still make funding decisions. Massa noted that SDCF has 1,300 funds and facilitated $267 million in charitable giving in 2025. Council asked about 501(c)(4) eligibility (rejected), and confirmed that the local decision-making process would remain. No formal decision was made, but council expressed interest.
DeNeui presented an overview of Spearfish’s eight TIF districts, historical and current:
Council members (particularly Doug Markworth) questioned the real property tax revenue versus inflated valuation numbers, and noted that upsize costs and ongoing service costs are often omitted. Ryan Wordeman clarified that school districts are made whole by the state for TIFs on affordable housing or industrial projects. DeNeui emphasized that the city has been conservative, only writing TIFs for amounts the increment can actually pay back.
Public Works Director McMahon proposed a trial subscription service for removing windrows from driveways, starting spring 2026 at no charge, to collect data on participation and operational feasibility. The service would target residents who are elderly, disabled, or have low income, with self-certification. Qualifying individuals would receive free service; others might pay an annual fee in the future. The city would continue current urgent-needs calls (medical appointments, medication deliveries). McMahon noted that the trial would use Excel spreadsheets to track sign-ups and that the city would coordinate Parks and Rec and other departments to improve efficiency. He also mentioned updating the snow guide to match the pending ordinance revisions. Council members (Dean Myers, Larry Rath) strongly supported prioritizing medical and disability needs, and suggested using Toolcats with snow throwers. Liability waivers were discussed to cover placing snow on lawns. The trial would inform budgeting for winter 2026-27. Public comments raised concerns about capacity and past failures, but the council expressed willingness to try and reevaluate.
Council member Hafner reported meeting with Hatchery Superintendent Carlos Martinez and D.C. Booth Society Executive Director Carolyn Ferrell. They requested updating the annual agreement between the city and the Booth Society (expired for years) and a letter of support for the hatchery to drill a well for groundwater to ensure fish health and prevent impacts from aquatic invasive species. Martinez explained that the well would be used for a portion of operations, not the whole facility, and that the state Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources requires evidence of public interest. The agreement would include use of the Snappers Club event venue, which had been discontinued due to lost institutional knowledge. Staff saw no zoning issues since the hatchery is on federal land zoned as parks. Council indicated support, and staff will work on finalizing the agreement and letter. No formal vote was taken.
Sound good. Oh, okay. All right. Well, uh, good afternoon, everyone. Go ahead and call today's meeting to order. Sorry for a little bit of a delay while we had a little technical difficulty there. Uh, for our agenda today, we have it in front of us. Um, gonna just make a quick amendment to move item three B to the front ahead of three A. Is there a motion to approve the amendment, please? Move to amend. Second. All in favor. That motion carries. Is there a motion to approve the amended agenda? Move to approve. Second. All in favor. Okay, we have an amended agenda before us. So first of all, we'll start out with item two, uh, reviewing City Council agenda for next Tuesday. Remember, next Monday is a holiday, so don't show up at City Hall Monday night. But so the seventeenth is our next meeting. Michelle, uh, please roll through the uh agenda, please. Yep. So uh Tuesday evening, and we'll start off on the consent agenda minutes, and then we have some more volunteers to add for the recreation center. That's for insurance purposes. We had first reading at last city council meeting, and no changes have been made. That is a fundraiser for the DC booth society. Um, and that will allow Probe brewing to sell for that event. And then we do have a new retail on off sale wine and cider license and a retail malt beverage license for uh seven oh one North Fifth Street. This is for new uh establishment going in. The legal name is Six Goats Tavern LLC. I don't know if that's the name they'll put on the building, but very interesting new business coming in. And then planning and zoning. I'll turn that over to Peter. Good afternoon, Council members. Yeah, from community development, we have two items. Item number one is a resolution adopting the um safety action plan that was presented to you at the last uh study session. Uh we did make some uh final revisions based on uh comments received from council and from uh members of the public. Uh we are recommending that you hold a public hearing uh while considering that resolution. Uh so uh hopefully um I'll be adopted. Uh and then second item on the agenda is something that was uh raised and advised by um Lawrence County is we have a piece of property that's developed um within city limits that continues to receive a rural service uh exemption uh from four mill levies. Uh we were notified by uh Lawrence County that that needs to be transferred from rural service to an urban service area given that it's within city limits. So that is a uh an ordinance or a first reading of the ordinance basically transferring um that from rural to urban area and then subject to the city's mill levy for property tax.