Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Spearfish City Council convened for its regular session on Monday, March 16, 2026, at 5:37 PM. Mayor Senden led the meeting, which featured significant public testimony regarding city transparency, approval of the fire training tower bid, and a detailed debate over solid waste fees leading to the denial of a proposed fee elimination. The meeting adjourned at 6:50 PM.
The council unanimously approved the consent agenda, which included the minutes from the February 25 study session and the March 2 regular session, temporary and permanent construction easements for the Mason Street Project (#2414), and the February 28 Treasurer's Report.
Okay. Um we have an agenda to approve. I don't have any changes to the agenda. Is there a motion to approve? Second. We have a motion and a second. All in favor. Aye. Opposed. Motion carries. And then just to note from council, any conflicts of interest with tonight's agenda. But there might be need to be acknowledged. I see none. With that, we're going to have uh we have public comment. And I did uh introduce some items uh regarding public comment in our study session. Um that we're gonna make some changes for public comment and uh not only public comment but how we address items on the agenda. So I guess go ahead and touch on a few of those items that I brought factually. Uh there was obviously a lighter attendance at that meeting. So I just want to make sure that uh people will get some clarity on this as we as we move forward. Uh our uh in our study session, which is held on Wednesday nights before council, we post an agenda by 12 o'clock on Tuesday. Study sessions are at 4 15. The council agenda is part of that. It's reviewed in that meeting, the council agenda for uh tonight was reviewed then. So that's about six days, a little over six days in advance of that. And then on Friday, the final council agenda is posted by 12. So there's three full days uh in a little bit of time in an afternoon to review that agenda. So um, with the agenda out early, most the public's questions can be addressed with a call to any member of council, the mayor or one of the department heads. There's been some um strong interest by citizens that the city is not as transparent as we could be, especially on items regarding spending taxpayer money. So I would like to lay this groundwork for a few months to see if we can resolve those concerns as follows. If a citizen has a strong opinion or wants a question asked in public by their council person, mayor for full disclosure, that would be an option if that person doesn't want to speak in public. If a person would rather ask the question themselves at city council, they can send an email to our executive assistant or the mayor. Um, and we we haven't set any time frame on that, but I'm looking at we would probably would want to do that by say 12 or one o'clock. So either a department head or uh uh public official would be ready to address that item. Um let's see, this was asked. I I know that Sierra had asked some questions for an article, and I I don't know if she's got that published yet, but there were good questions. She one of her questions was citizens ask questions in open session to give their neighbors a chance to hear some the same answers. Does this method help serve that purpose? And I responded yes. We want to make sure the questions of financial impact definitely get out into the public, even if the person asking the question does not want to stand up at the podium.