OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Spearfish, South Dakota/Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Spearfish Planning Commission Regular Meeting – April 21, 2026

Planning Commission — Tuesday, April 21, 2026
BodySpearfish, South Dakota
SessionPlanning Commission
DateTuesday, April 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:43:10

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

8:52

Yeah.

8:53

Just no make

Unassigned speaker

8:54

it

Speaker 2

8:56

at least one of the two hours.

9:18

Yes, sir.

Speaker 1

9:19

Let's call the meeting to order.

9:20

First item.

9:21

Can we have a roll call, please?

Speaker 3

9:24

Yes.

9:24

Duncan.

9:31

Tisto.

9:35

Hiram.

9:38

Davidson.

9:39

Here.

Speaker 1

9:41

Changes to the agenda is printed.

Speaker 4

9:50

Second.

Speaker 1

9:51

Second discussion on the motion.

9:53

All in favor signify by saying aye.

Unassigned speaker

10:00

Minutes from the last meeting.

Speaker 1

10:01

Everybody receive them.

10:02

Any changes, corrections.

10:06

A motion to approve.

Speaker 5

10:07

Move to approve.

Speaker 1

10:08

Thank

Unassigned speaker

10:08

you.

Speaker 1

10:09

Second.

10:10

Discussion.

Unassigned speaker

10:11

All

Speaker 1

10:11

in favor of the motion signified by saying aye.

10:14

Aye.

10:14

Post same sign.

Unassigned speaker

10:17

Okay.

Speaker 1

10:18

Any conflicts of interest pertaining to the agenda.

10:21

I have none.

10:24

Okay.

10:26

First item is a public hearing.

10:29

And it's consideration of the tax increment financing district.

10:33

Please present this to us.

Speaker 6

10:43

Good afternoon.

10:44

Good afternoon, Planning Commission.

10:46

For the record, Peter Isaacy, community development director.

10:49

I'll be presenting this item for you tonight on the proposed tax increment financing application for a project named Pines at Elkhorn Ridge Development.

11:03

If you recall, we presented this item to you just as an informational presentation two weeks ago.

11:11

Some of the information is basically identical, but because it's a public hearing, I feel it's important to uh uh provide a complete uh complete presentation maybe nope.

11:36

Okay, we'll just go this

Unassigned speaker

11:38

way.

Speaker 6

11:40

So uh the project uh contains a 98 multifamily uh units.

11:47

It's basically an apartment complex.

11:49

Uh it has current zoning of DRD.

11:52

Uh the project itself is a use by right within that zoning district and a DRD um plan that was a previously approved by the city.

12:03

Uh the project's site is approximately seven acres, and that's I think being covered by the little there we go.

12:13

Yep, seven acres.

12:14

Uh it includes on-site parking, uh parking garages, as well as uncovered uh parking and a multi-use trail along St.

12:26

Arch Road.

12:29

Oh, it did work now.

12:32

Now it's working.

12:33

Uh this is just an illustration of the project itself.

12:37

Uh the project is under administrative review uh at staff level to address all the utility uh connections, parking landscaping, uh, so on so forth.

12:48

Obviously, the project review and approval is not under consideration by the planning commission as it is a use by right.

12:56

Uh, but these are just some uh illustrations of the project itself.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Water And Wastewater Management███████████████████████23%
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████17%
Tax Increment Financing███████████████15%
Affordable Housing███████████11%
Zoning Regulations█████████9%
Public Engagement████████8%
Procedural███████7%
Legal Procedures██████6%
Public Safety██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Spearfish Planning Commission Regular Meeting – April 21, 2026

The Spearfish Planning Commission met on April 21, 2026, at 4:00 PM in City Hall and via Zoom. The meeting included three main agenda items: a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district for the Pines at Elkhorn Ridge affordable housing development, a conditional use permit for New Covenant Presbyterian Church, and proposed revisions to City Code Chapter 154 (Subdivisions). The commission also discussed future TIF procedures and received an update on the Safety Action Plan open house.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the agenda as presented (4-0).
  • Approved the minutes from the April 7, 2026 regular meeting (4-0).
  • No conflicts of interest were declared.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Jeremy Smith (287 Evans Lane) spoke during the TIF public hearing, raising concerns about the project's consistency with state statutes (SDCL 11‑9‑5, 8) and city TIF policy guidelines. He argued that the TIF application lacked adequate “but‑for” justification and noted that the city’s TIF policy for affordable housing refers to owner‑occupied single‑family homes, not rentals. He warned that approving TIFs that only loosely meet criteria could risk losing the tool.
  • Brad Limbo (1955 Maitland Road) commented during the Chapter 154 public hearing, noting that the proposed ordinance revisions rely on an Engineering Design Standards (EDS) document that is not publicly available in its final form. He recommended removing the on‑site wastewater (septic) issue from the current ordinance to allow for a separate, focused public hearing.
  • Randy Diver (Professional Mapping and Surveying, 1715 Scott Avenue; identified as “Deibert” in the official minutes) provided detailed line‑by‑line suggestions on several sections of the proposed subdivision code. He supported pulling the eight‑acre septic requirement out of this ordinance and into a dedicated public hearing process, and emphasized that the EDS must be finalized before the subdivision code changes can be properly evaluated.

Discussion Items

  • Tax Increment Financing District for Pines at Elkhorn Ridge: Community Development Director Peter Wysocki presented the project—98 affordable multifamily units on approximately seven acres, with rents capped at 80% of area median income for 10 years. The applicant is seeking reimbursement of up to $2.05 million in eligible costs (on‑site improvements, utility connections, and a multi‑use trail). The applicant, Quinn Rhymes (Collier Securities and Pier), stated that without the TIF the project would not be economically feasible due to high interest rates. Commissioners questioned the definition of “affordable” and the absence of long‑term job creation. Commissioner Bordewyk moved to recommend approval of the TIF district boundary and project plan to the City Council; the motion passed 4‑0. Commissioners also suggested that future TIF applications include the full text of relevant state statutes (SDCL 11‑9‑5, 8, 9, 10) and a staff response showing how each statutory criterion is met.
  • Conditional Use Permit for New Covenant Presbyterian Church: Assistant Planning Director Jaymia Ecker reported that the church, located at 1120 N 5th Street, has operated for over 50 years in a residential (R‑2) zone. The application simply brings the facility into compliance; no public comments were offered. The commission commended the church for its cooperation. A motion to approve the conditional use permit passed 4‑0.
  • Subdivision Code Revisions (Chapter 154): Staff presented version 2 of the ordinance changes, which remove the link between zoning district and the ability to use wells and septic systems, maintaining an eight‑acre minimum lot size for such systems. Assistant City Engineer Adam Spindler gave a technical presentation, describing the environmental risks of concentrated septic systems in the Black Hills aquifer recharge area and recommending larger lots (≥5 acres) for any future septic use. Commissioners debated whether the eight‑acre figure is appropriate and how the pending Engineering Design Standards (EDS) should be integrated. A motion to continue the public hearing to May 19, 2026, passed 4‑0, allowing time for an April 29 stakeholders’ meeting on the EDS and for commissioners to submit further comments.

Key Outcomes

  • TIF Recommendation: The Planning Commission voted 4‑0 to recommend that the City Council create the TIF district and adopt the project plan for Pines at Elkhorn Ridge.
  • Conditional Use Permit: Approved 4‑0 for New Covenant Presbyterian Church.
  • Subdivision Code Revisions: The public hearing was continued to May 19, 2026; staff will incorporate stakeholder feedback and finalize the EDS before the next hearing.
  • Future TIF Process: Commissioners formally requested that future TIF application packets include the full text of SDCL 11‑9‑5, 8, 9, and 10, along with a staff analysis of how each statutory requirement is satisfied.

Meeting Transcript

Yeah. Just no make it at least one of the two hours. Yes, sir. Let's call the meeting to order. First item. Can we have a roll call, please? Yes. Duncan. Tisto. Hiram. Davidson. Here. Changes to the agenda is printed. Second. Second discussion on the motion. All in favor signify by saying aye. Minutes from the last meeting. Everybody receive them. Any changes, corrections. A motion to approve. Move to approve. Thank you. Second. Discussion. All in favor of the motion signified by saying aye. Aye. Post same sign. Okay. Any conflicts of interest pertaining to the agenda. I have none. Okay. First item is a public hearing. And it's consideration of the tax increment financing district. Please present this to us. Good afternoon. Good afternoon, Planning Commission. For the record, Peter Isaacy, community development director. I'll be presenting this item for you tonight on the proposed tax increment financing application for a project named Pines at Elkhorn Ridge Development. If you recall, we presented this item to you just as an informational presentation two weeks ago. Some of the information is basically identical, but because it's a public hearing, I feel it's important to uh uh provide a complete uh complete presentation maybe nope. Okay, we'll just go this way. So uh the project uh contains a 98 multifamily uh units. It's basically an apartment complex. Uh it has current zoning of DRD. Uh the project itself is a use by right within that zoning district and a DRD um plan that was a previously approved by the city.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com